TIME magazine has had to issue a humiliating correction after asserting that Kamala Harris does not support taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries for illegalalien prisoners. In its initial coverage of Harris’s debate with Donald Trump on ABC News, the magazine had asserted that Trump “falsely claimed that Harris “wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.'”
Trump’s claim was not false. In 2019, Harris really did tell the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) that she would use “executive authority to ensure that transgender and non-binary people who rely on the state for medical care—including those in prison and immigration detention—will have access to comprehensive treatment associated with gender transition, including all necessary surgical care.”
“It is important that transgender individuals who rely on the state for care receive the treatment they need, which includes access to treatment associated with gender transition,” Harris explained. “That’s why, as [California’s] Attorney General, I pushed the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide gender transition surgery to state inmates.”
Harris also told the ACLU she supports decriminalizing illegal drug abuse and huge cuts to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) funding and operations, including an “end” to all immigration detention.
“The original version of this story mischaracterized as false Donald Trump’s statement accusing Kamala Harris of supporting ‘transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison,'” TIME wrote in its correction.
“As a presidential candidate in 2019, Harris filled out a questionnaire saying she supported taxpayer-funded gender transition treatment for detained immigrants,” the magazine admitted.
TIME magazine has had to issue a humiliating correction after asserting that Kamala Harris does not support taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries for illegal alien prisoners. In its initial coverage of Harris's debate with Donald Trump on ABC News, the magazine had asserted that Trump "falsely claimed that Harris "wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.'"
show more
Foreign media outlets are spinning hard for Kamala Harris following her debate against Donald Trump on Tuesday, feeding a narrative that she “got under his skin” and rubbishing his remarks about Haitian migrants killing pets in Ohio—an emphasis that could come back to haunt them if the allegations are substantiated. However, many conceded ABC News skewed the debate and that Harris did not outline a clear vision. There are also signs her pro-Israel remarks alienated Muslim voters key to winning swing states such as Michigan.
MOTHER COUNTRY.
Britain’s Telegraph, a notionally right-wing broadsheet, damned Harris with faint praise, with U.S. editor Tony Diver claiming she “made [Trump] look ridiculous” but “gave woolly and unclear answers on questions about the economy, and could not convincingly shrug off accusations from both Trump and the moderator that she has abandoned many of her beliefs in favour of the pursuit of power.”
Telegraph columnist Tim Stanley, who has long advocated for censoring Trump online, described the debate as a case of “he was crazy and she was insufferable,” giving a “narrow win” to the former president overall.
Telegraph readers gave Harris a slight edge, at 56 percent, but—like Stanley—suggested the ABC moderators tipped the scales in favor of the Vice President. “[T]he moderators were doing the debating for Harris,” said one.
The Daily Mail commissioned a poll of 800 independents, with 49 percent saying Harris won the debate against 43 percent who gave the nod to Trump. However, Harris only gained two points in terms of voting intention, rising from 36 percent to 38 percent. Trump also rose, from 44 percent to 45 percent.
‘SUPPORTING GENOCIDE.’
Qatar-owned Al Jazeera interviewed a number of “experts” post-debate. Predictably, none of the mostly left-leaning observers gave a clear advantage to Trump, but support for Harris was not effusive. Barbara Perry of the University of Virginia merely said, “At the very least, she didn’t put [undecided, moderate] voters off or make any disqualifying gaffes.”
However, in a sign of trouble for Harris in swing states, she received criticism for her stance on the Israel-Hamas war. “Vice President Harris has been pretty clear in previous statements, as she was tonight, that she will continue Biden’s policy of unconditional military and financial support for Israel’s war on Gaza,” said Reem Abuelhaj, of the No Ceasefire No Vote organization, referencing voters who feel “unable to cast their ballot for a candidate who is actively supporting genocide.”
Oh man they’re gonna pump Michigan with that clip of her saying she loves Israel 4eva https://t.co/QSEA78VLP1
SBS News, owned by the Australian state, said Harris won the debate—citing a CNN poll—and insisted, like many media outlets, that the Vice President got “under Trump’s skin.” However, the state media organ could not help but betray its clear bias, asserting Trump has “spent weeks insulting [Harris] with racist and sexist attacks.”
Sky News Australia, which leans right, stressed the bias of the ABC moderators. “I didn’t know whether I was watching Trump versus Kamala Harris or if I was watching Trump versus the ABC and Kamala Harris,” said one host. “Every single time they could, they gave her an assist.”
DO-OVER.
While many foreign media outlets claim the Harris camp expressing its willingness to do a second debate in October shows they are confident she won on Tuesday, Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes it shows they want a do-over.
Previously, ABC—which has a 100 percent positive spin score for Harris—was the only venue the Vice President’s team was willing to accept for a debate, with Fox News and even NBC rejected.
show less
Foreign media outlets are spinning hard for Kamala Harris following her debate against Donald Trump on Tuesday, feeding a narrative that she "got under his skin" and rubbishing his remarks about Haitian migrants killing pets in Ohio—an emphasis that could come back to haunt them if the allegations are substantiated. However, many conceded ABC News skewed the debate and that Harris did not outline a clear vision. There are also signs her pro-Israel remarks alienated Muslim voters key to winning swing states such as Michigan.
show more
The BBC breached its editorial guidelines on more than 1,500 occasions at the peak of the Israel-Hamas conflict, more frequently associating genocide and war crimes with Israel compared to Hamas. British lawyer Trevor Asserson headed a report that identified a significant bias against Israel in the BBC coverage over four months.
The report documents 1,553 breaches of editorial guidelines, including impartiality, accuracy, and adherence to editorial values and public interest. Specifically, it highlights that Israel was more frequently associated with genocide and war crimes compared to Hamas, with a marked disparity in terminology. Notably, Israel was linked to genocide 14 times more often than Hamas.
Former BBC executive Danny Cohen has characterized the situation as an “institutional crisis” and called for an independent inquiry into the state broadcaster’s coverage of the conflict along with Jewish groups. The report alleges that some BBC journalists have shown sympathy for Hamas and engaged in biased reporting. Specific individuals such as Jeremy Bowen, the BBC’s international editor, and Lyse Doucet, its chief international correspondent, are cited for excusing Hamas’s actions and downplaying the October 7 attacks on Israel.
In response to these findings, the BBC criticized the report’s use of AI for impartiality analysis and its interpretation of the BBC’s editorial guidelines.
The BBC has been criticized for months over its bias against Israel during the conflict with Hamas, with six BBC staff in the Middle East being removed from the air after their pro-Hamas social media posts emerged last October.
The broadcaster was also forced to apologize in November of last year for mistakenly claiming that Israel was deliberately targeting medical staff in Gaza’s Al Shifa Hospital.
show less
The BBC breached its editorial guidelines on more than 1,500 occasions at the peak of the Israel-Hamas conflict, more frequently associating genocide and war crimes with Israel compared to Hamas. British lawyer Trevor Asserson headed a report that identified a significant bias against Israel in the BBC coverage over four months.
show more
A Media Research Center (MRC) analysis reveals that ABC, set to host the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris on Tuesday, is more pro-Harris than any comparable evening newscast and overwhelmingly negative towards Trump. Analysts reviewed 100 World News Tonight campaign reports aired from July 21, when Harris declared her candidacy, to September 6, finding Harris received 25 distinctly positive comments and no negative remarks from ABC’s reporters, anchors, or non-partisan sources—a 100 percent positive spin rate.
Trump’s ABC coverage included only five positive comments against 66 negative statements, giving him a 7 percent positive and 93 percent negative spin score. CBS and NBC also strongly favored Harris, with CBS’s coverage being 94 percent positive and NBC’s 71 percent. Trump’s coverage at CBS and NBC was 77 percent and 86 percent negative, respectively. Still, neither was as uniformly positive for Harris as ABC.
ABC did not label Harris as “liberal” or “progressive” even once. This is despite the fact she once rated as the most liberal senator in Congress, ahead of even Bernie Sanders, and has backed far-left policies such as decriminalizing illegal border crossings.
ABC consistently highlighted Trump’s controversies but downplayed negative stories related to Harris. For example, it did not report on an adulteryincident involving Harris’s husband that was mentioned, albeit briefly, by CBS and NBC.
David Muir, a moderator of the Trump-Harris debate, is the managing editor of World News Tonight.
Trump describes ABC as “by far the nastiest and most unfair newscaster in the business.” However, it is the only network Harris has agreed to debate on, refusing Fox News and, so far, even NBC.
ABC executive Dana Walden and her husband are close personal friends of Harris and her husband. Harris has previously said the Waldens, who have been donating to her since 2003, are “In many ways… responsible for my marriage.”
A Media Research Center (MRC) analysis reveals that ABC, set to host the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris on Tuesday, is more pro-Harris than any comparable evening newscast and overwhelmingly negative towards Trump. Analysts reviewed 100 World News Tonight campaign reports aired from July 21, when Harris declared her candidacy, to September 6, finding Harris received 25 distinctly positive comments and no negative remarks from ABC’s reporters, anchors, or non-partisan sources—a 100 percent positive spin rate.
show more
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes the Biden-Harris Department of Justice (DOJ) probe into an alleged Russian influence operation targeting right-leaning influencers appears “confected” to distract from Chinese influence scandals on the left and pay-for-play in the corporate media.
Appearing on the Charlie Kirk Show, Kassam noted that the alleged Russian influence operation centers on a Canadian personality, Laren Chen, who has appeared “quite anti-Trump in her rhetoric” in recent years. Other influencers referenced in connection with the scheme, such as Tim Pool and Benny Johnson, seem to have been “unwitting, unwilling participants,” even according to the DOJ.
“It smacks of 2016… the smoking gun doesn’t appear to be anywhere near MAGA world,” Kassam said.
The National Pulse chief said the DOJ announcement, which comes just weeks before the November election, feeds into a “confected narrative” about Russian influence on the right that distracts from leftists’ involvement in high-profile Democratic scandals, such as Senator Bob Menendez taking money, gold bars, and other bribes from foreign governments, and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) influence on the left.
“China is far and away more influential with things like this than Russia [or] Iran, and we never, ever seem to talk about that,” Kassam said, citing “Marxist journalist training programs” and operations that “peddle propaganda” down to the level of public schools, such as the Confucius Institutes.
WATCH:
The Biden-Harris Justice Department’s latest Russia probe looks like a 2016-style distraction from Chinese influence scandals and Foreign Agent violations on the left, explains @RaheemKassam. pic.twitter.com/g4uLq7CLWU
Kassam also stressed that foreign influence is out in the open in the corporate media: “Think of the likes of News Corp, CNN, Bloomberg, all of these guys,” he said, noting they have “vast, vast international operations, [and] they also vast, vast amounts of foreign cash sloshing around, foreign board members that sit at the tops of their companies [and] have an influence over what the news looks like.”
“[W]hen you look at these huge media conglomerates, it’s all pay for play… They’re laundering information, they’re laundering falsehoods a lot of the time,” he said, contrasting this with the National Pulse being “100 percent member-funded.”
WATCH:
As the Biden-Harris Justice Department tries to focus everyone’s attention on alleged Russian influence over a few social media personalities, @RaheemKassam reminds everyone of the huge influence of foreign money (and foreign executives) in the corporate media: pic.twitter.com/YPnOveCr9q
Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, believes the Biden-Harris Department of Justice (DOJ) probe into an alleged Russian influence operation targeting right-leaning influencers appears "confected" to distract from Chinese influence scandals on the left and pay-for-play in the corporate media.
show more
The far-left ‘Independent’ newspaper, which consistently intervenes in favor of Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party in the United States, is embroiled in a ChineseCommunist Party (CCP) propaganda relationship that sees masses of pro-China “puff pieces” published on its website, furthering the interests of the CCP in the U.S., UK, and Europe.
“China Watch” – a series of articles by CCP-state-run newspaper China Daily, provides content for the Independent without any editorial oversight nor scrutiny from the UK-based paper, which in turn is owned by globalist oligarchy Evgeny Lebedev, as well as Saudi businessman Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel.
Articles published by the Independent take the form of “soft-PR” for the Chinese government, often “reporting” on business opportunities for foreign firms, cultural issues, and trade with China.
As the Independent takes money from the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda newspaper, it has also sought to interfere in the 2024 presidential race, regularly publishing articles clearly biased toward the Kamala Harris campaign.
Articles on former president Donald J. Trump bear headlines such as “Trump says convicted criminals should spend time behind bars. What about him?” or “Trump tried to explain how he plans to make childcare more affordable. It was a word salad.”
Vice President Kamala Harrisreceived a much more favorable set of headlines, such as, “Optimism in the country perked up after Harris entered race, with poll reaching highest peak since 2021.”
The Independent’s collusion with China follows the plethora of mainstream outlets that have been taking CCP-sponsored trips to China in exchange for favorable coverage for years as part of groups like the China-United States Exchange Foundation.
In 2021, a member of President Joe Biden’s China team even stated she was “fine” with China spreading influence and propaganda in America.
show less
The far-left 'Independent' newspaper, which consistently intervenes in favor of Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party in the United States, is embroiled in a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda relationship that sees masses of pro-China "puff pieces" published on its website, furthering the interests of the CCP in the U.S., UK, and Europe.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
The Associated Press (AP) has deleted a disingenuous article claiming former President Donald J. Trump‘s running mate, Senator J.D. Vance, described school shootings as “a fact of life.” The supposedly impartial news wire service had taken the Ohio lawmaker grossly out of context, with his full quote on the subject of a recent shooting in Georgia being, “I don’t like this. I don’t like to admit this. I don’t like that this is a fact of life, but if you are a psycho and you want to make headlines, you’ve realized that our schools are soft targets, and we have got to bolster security at our schools.”
Vance also said, “If these psychos are going to go after our kids, we’ve got to be prepared for it,” stressing: “We don’t have to like the reality that we live in, but it is the reality we live in. We’ve got to deal with it.”
AP acknowledges it provided only a “partial quote”—eagerly seizedupon by the Kamala Harris campaign—in a social mediapost sharing its replacement article. However, it has stopped short of issuing an apology.
REPUTATIONAL DAMAGE.
The news agency received heavy criticism for its misleading reporting. The scandal follows X (formerly Twitter) owner and tech mogul Elon Musk stating, “AP stands for Associated Propaganda,” in response to another questionable report on “Right-wing influencers [being] duped to work for [a] covert Russian influence operation.” This was illustrated with a photograph of Donald Trump, despite the fact that most of the influencers were not Trump supporters.
The “fact of life” article is not the first article on Vance that AP has had to delete. In July, a gratuitous “fact check” centered on a false claim about the vice presidential hopeful having “sex with a couch” was taken down, with the new agency admitting the article “didn’t go through our standard editing process.”
NEW: The Associated Press (@AP) has deleted a tweet which claimed GOP VP candidate @JDVance said school shootings are “a fact of life.”
Vance actually said: “I don’t like that this is a fact of life, but if you are a psycho and you want to make headlines, you realize that our… pic.twitter.com/JfHuHDF3P0
“This is yet another case of the fake news media brazenly lying about a Republican politician,” Vance’s spokesman William Martin told The National Pulse.
”Senator Vance said exactly the opposite of what the Associated Press claimed. It should come as no surprise that the AP lost any and all credibility it had years ago, because they will lie about literally anything in order prop up the Democrats. Meanwhile, Kamala Harris has called for all police officers to be removed from schools, putting children all over America at risk. It’s yet another example of how Kamala Harris’s weak, failed, and dangerously liberal agenda makes her unfit for office.”
show less
The Associated Press (AP) has deleted a disingenuous article claiming former President Donald J. Trump's running mate, Senator J.D. Vance, described school shootings as "a fact of life." The supposedly impartial news wire service had taken the Ohio lawmaker grossly out of context, with his full quote on the subject of a recent shooting in Georgia being, “I don’t like this. I don’t like to admit this. I don’t like that this is a fact of life, but if you are a psycho and you want to make headlines, you’ve realized that our schools are soft targets, and we have got to bolster security at our schools.”
show more
While much is being made of the Biden Department of Justice’s (DOJ) indictment of two Russian nationals for allegedly enlisting a U.S. company and social media influencers to push pro-Russia propaganda on YouTube, corporate media has remained silent on far more complex and concerning foreign influence operations. The National Pulse’s Editor-in-Chief, Raheem Kassam, revealed five years ago in a video for Prager University that one of the most far-reaching foreigninfluenceschemes has operated openly as a social media endeavor in the U.S. and continues to do so.
Owned by the Al Jazeera news network, AJ+ is funded by the Persian Gulf state of Qatar. Despite its deep foreign connections, the organization has received minimal scrutiny from the DOJ. However, multiple Members of Congress— including former Representative Lee Zeldin (R-NY)—have raised the issue over the years.
TERRORIST TIES.
“AJ+ is bankrolled by the government of Qatar,” Kassam explains, continuing: “[Qatar] is a tiny Persian Gulf state with lots of oil money, billions of dollars they’re not afraid to spend causes they believe in. Causes like the terror group Hamas, which runs the Gaza Strip.”
Kassam goes on to note that aside from Hamas, Qatar also funds the Muslim Brotherhood, al Qaeda, and Hezbollah. The Persian Gulf state promotes the interests of its terror clients through its funding of the Arab news network Al Jazeera. The network rolled out AJ+ following its failed 2013 attempt to launch a U.S. news network after purchasing a media company from former Vice President Al Gore.
FOREIGN INFLUENCE.
Under the AJ+ banner, Al Jazeera and Qatar target American youth, pushing far-left messaging in an effort to sow division and influence U.S. politics and elections. “The young and hip presenters at AJ+ depict America as racist through-and-through, past-and-present,” Kassas states, adding: “Black Lives Matter has no greater media ally than AJ+. Nor do avowed socialists, like Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.”
While Qatar has primarily operated its foreign influence scheme through AJ+, the Persian Gulf state has also used other intermediaries, including former MSNBC host Mehdi Hassan, who now works for Al Jazeera. Additionally, Qatar has reportedly made a large investment in Newsmax through a member of its royal family.
The National Pulse reported in April this year that Joe Biden‘s brother, Jim Biden, also has concerning ties to Qatar—partnering with business interests controlled by the Persian Gulf state.
WATCH:
show less
While much is being made of the Biden Department of Justice's (DOJ) indictment of two Russian nationals for allegedly enlisting a U.S. company and social media influencers to push pro-Russia propaganda on YouTube, corporate media has remained silent on far more complex and concerning foreign influence operations. The National Pulse's Editor-in-Chief, Raheem Kassam, revealed five years ago in a video for Prager University that one of the most far-reaching foreigninfluenceschemes has operated openly as a social media endeavor in the U.S. and continues to do so.
show more
A sprawling federal investigation into an alleged Russian foreign influence operation in the United States has resulted in a lengthy indictment that names several prominent conservatives and right-leaning influencers as unwitting participants in the scheme. Released yesterday by the Department of Justice (DOJ), the 32-page indictment alleges two Russian nationals spearheaded an influence operation targeting an American audience to subtly push pro-Russia propaganda.
The DOJ claims that Kostiantyn Kalashnikov and Elena Afanasyeva—both employees of Russia Today—are at the center of a money laundering operation that spent nearly $10 million using a network of shell companies in the U.S. and Europe to influence and sow division among Americans. Russia Today—recently rebranded as RT—is a Russian state-controlled media outlet forced to register as a foreign agent in the United States in 2017 under former President Donald J. Trump.
RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA.
According to the indictment, the Russian operatives approached a Tennesee-based media company—widely understood to be Tenet Media—offering to finance a social media operation primarily centered on YouTube videos addressing hot-button American political issues. However, as part of the financial agreement, Kalashnikov and Afanasyeva would have a high degree of control over the content published. The two would use false identities in their interactions with content creators, directing them to unwittingly push Russian interests among more standard social media political commentary.
Tenet Media is owned by Canadian national and right-wing social media personality Lauren Chen and her husband, Liam Donovan. The DOJ indictment does not mention either by name, nor does it level criminal charges—as of now—against the couple. However, the charging document does allege that both Chen and Donovan were aware that they were working with and taking money from Russian operatives and appear to be complicit in pushing Russian propaganda.
UNWITTING PARTICIPANTS.
The indictment notes that while Tenet Media’s leadership appeared willing to participate in the Russian influence scheme, the company’s clients were unaware of the foreign connections. Tenet Media had relationships with a roster of conservative and right-leaning influencers, including Benny Johnson, Tim Pool, and Dave Rubin.
“A year ago, a media startup pitched my company to provide content as an independent contractor. Our lawyers negotiated a standard, arms length deal, which was later terminated,” Johnson wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter) responding to the indictment. He adds: “We are disturbed by the allegations in today’s indictment, which make clear that myself and other influencers were victims in this alleged scheme.”
Also, responding to the indictment, Dave Rubin wrote on X: “These allegations clearly show that I and other commentators were the victims of this scheme. I knew absolutely nothing about any of this fraudulent activity. Period.”
Rubin stresses that the DOJ has never contacted him regarding its investigation and subsequent indictment.
show less
A sprawling federal investigation into an alleged Russian foreign influence operation in the United States has resulted in a lengthy indictment that names several prominent conservatives and right-leaning influencers as unwitting participants in the scheme. Released yesterday by the Department of Justice (DOJ), the 32-page indictment alleges two Russian nationals spearheaded an influence operation targeting an American audience to subtly push pro-Russia propaganda.
show more
President Donald Trump criticized ABC and its executives during a Fox News town hall with Sean Hannity last night, asserting that Kamala Harris and network chief Dana Walden have a 30-year-long friendship and whose spouses are also best friends. The New York Times confirmed the allegation last month, reporting:
The executive, Dana Walden, first met Kamala Harris in 1994. Their husbands, Matt Walden and Doug Emhoff have known each other since the 1980s. The Waldens — “extraordinary friends,” per the vice president — have donated money to Ms. Harris’s political campaigns since at least 2003, when she ran for district attorney in San Francisco.
Trump’s remarks come ahead of a debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, which ABC News will host on September 10.
The National Pulse can reveal the Waldens have donated millions to Democrats over the past several election cycles in the United States, giving to Kamala Harris, as well as Gavin Newsom, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden, and many more.
“Her husband’s best friend is married to the head of the network, and they’re going to get the questions I’ve already heard,” he said, adding, “They’re going to get the questions in advance.”
“In many ways, Dana and Matt are responsible for my marriage,” Harris told a group of donors in 2022.
In July, establishment news outlet Puck even ran the headline ‘Harris-Walden ’24’ – claiming, “if there’s a Hollywood winner in her ascension it’s probably Dana Walden, the Disney TV chief. Walden and her husband, Matt, go back years with Harris. Along with producer Reggie Hudlin and his wife Chrisette, they’re maybe the closest to Harris and her L.A. entertainment lawyer husband, Doug Emhoff, according to a couple Dem insiders I polled.”
Such a glaring conflict of interest would usually have repercussions in a hotly-contested presidential election, but ABC has swept away the claims, asserting Walden simply has nothing to do with editorial decisions around news. This is despite a press release from 2022, when she took the role, which states:
The Walt Disney Company has named Dana Walden as Chairman, Disney General Entertainment Content, it was announced today by Bob Chapek, Chief Executive Officer, The Walt Disney Company. In this role, Walden will lead the company’s general entertainment content engine that creates original entertainment and news programming for Disney’s streaming platforms and its cable and broadcast networks. She will have oversight of ABC Entertainment, ABC News, Disney Branded Television, Disney Television Studios, Freeform, FX, Hulu Originals, National Geographic Content, and Onyx Collective. Walden previously served as Chairman, Entertainment, Walt Disney Television and succeeds Peter Rice, who is leaving the Company.
show less
President Donald Trump criticized ABC and its executives during a Fox News town hall with Sean Hannity last night, asserting that Kamala Harris and network chief Dana Walden have a 30-year-long friendship and whose spouses are also best friends. The New York Times confirmed the allegation last month, reporting:
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
