Monday, June 16, 2025
Trump Border Mass Deportations

Finally, the U.S. Is About to Go After Foreign Workers Sending Dollars Overseas.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: A tax provision in the House Republicans’ budget reconciliation bill would enact a five percent tax of foreign remittances, which causes a drain on the U.S. economy and enriches foreign nations at the expense of Americans.

👥 Who’s Involved: House Republicans, President Donald J. Trump, foreign workers, and American workers.

📍 Where & When: The tax provisions for the budget reconciliation bill were revealed on Monday, May 12, in the form of an amendment to the broader legislation. The amendment is currently undergoing mark-up in the House Ways and Means Committee.

💬 Key Quote: “We should take fees on the remittances sent [to] other countries around the world when people come to our country illegally and wire money back home, we should tax those remittances. Take that money and use it to pay for the wall, to pay for ICE agents, to pay for Border Patrol,” Representative Chip Roy (R-TX) said in a floor speech late last year.

⚠️ Impact:

IN FULL:

Buried in the House Republicans’ budget reconciliation bill is a tax provision long sought by immigration hawks in the U.S. Under the plan, foreign workers who send portions of their income back to their home countries will pay a five percent tax on the transfer. Notably, U.S. citizens who make foreign transfers can recoup the five percent tax through a credit when filing annually or quarterly.

President Donald J. Trump attempted to institute a tax on remittances, the act of foreign workers making non-commercial transfers of money or goods to their families in their country of origin, during his first term in office. However, the measure was sidelined by the COVID-19 pandemic. Under the House Republican plan, remittances will be taxed at a modest five percent, on top of existing income and payroll taxes foreign workers pay on their wages.

Remittances are the single largest form of financial inflow from one country to another worldwide, dwarfing foreign aid. In 2021, remittance payments accounted for $780 billion being sent to 800 million people, from one country to another. In the same year, foreign aid only accounted for a total cross-national flow of around $200 billion.

Notably, remittances from the United States comprise a significant portion of Mexico’s gross domestic product (GDP). In 2022, remittances made up about four percent of Mexican GDP. A similar percentage has been forecast for 2024. Remittances from the U.S. to Mexico constitute the latter’s largest foreign income source, even larger than foreign direct investment (FDI).

The remittance tax is reflective of President Trump’s broader America First agenda, which is focused on boosting domestic American industries and protecting American workers from foreign predatory actions. Additionally, the measure will effectively punish an economic behavior that removes dollars and consumption from the U.S. and transfers that economic activity to Mexico. Trump has repeatedly worked to end unearned benefits that Mexico enjoys from the U.S. unless it ramps up efforts to stymie the flow of fentanyl and other drugs into the U.S. and moves to end the influence and power of drug cartels.

Following Trump’s landslide presidential election victory last November, the idea of taxing remittances gained steam in the House of Representatives. During a floor speech shortly after the election, Representative Chip Roy (R-TX) stated: “We should take fees on the remittances sent there and other countries around the world when people come to our country illegally and wire money back home, we should tax those remittances. Take that money and use it to pay for the wall, to pay for ICE agents, to pay for Border Patrol.”

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

LGBT Groups Refuse to Allow Party Involvement Until Politicians Usurp Supreme Court.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Four major Pride events in Britain have banned political parties from participating officially, citing solidarity with the transgender community.

👥 Who’s Involved: Birmingham, Brighton, London, and Manchester Pride organizations; British political parties; transgenders; the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).

📍 Where & When: Britain, announcement made following a Supreme Court ruling that determined sex is determined by biology, not gender identity, for the purpose of equality law.

💬 Key Quote: “In this moment, we choose to stand firmer, louder, and prouder in demanding change that protects and uplifts trans lives,” said Pride organizers.

⚠️ Impact: Political parties are excluded from major Pride events unless they commit to returning transgender “women” to women’s single-sex spaces and sports, amidst ongoing debates over gender recognition laws.

IN FULL:

Four of the United Kingdom’s largest LGBT Pride organizations have announced a ban on political parties participating in their events in an official capacity, citing solidarity with transgenders. Birmingham, Brighton, London, and Manchester Pride groups issued a joint statement explaining the decision, which they said was driven by a lack of commitment to transgenderism among political parties.

The announcement follows a Supreme Court ruling that defined “woman” under the Equality Act as being based on biological sex. While this decision has been welcomed by many citizens and campaigners, particularly lesbian and gender-critical groups, it has been resisted by transgender activists.

The Pride groups stated that the ruling highlighted the need for urgent action and described their move as a refusal to “platform those who have not protected our rights.” They also called for reforms, including full “protections” under the Equality Act—likely meaning renewed access to women’s spaces—as well as improved access to transgender medical interventions and sustained funding for trans-led services.

“In this moment, we choose to stand firmer, louder, and prouder in demanding change that protects and uplifts trans lives,” the Pride groups said in a joint statement.

The Supreme Court ruling stems from a case involving the Scottish Parliament’s gender balance legislation, which included transgenders in quotas for women. The court clarified that the Equality Act’s definition of sex is based on biology, not gender identity, even for those holding a government Gender Recognition Certificate.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) subsequently issued guidance emphasizing that access to single-sex spaces must align with biological sex.

Some groups, such as Scottish Lesbians, welcomed the clarification, stating it protects women’s rights. They have criticized Pride organizers for excluding lesbians by prioritizing transgender issues.

The decision to exclude political parties affects events that collectively attract over a million attendees annually. Political figures, including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, have historically participated in Pride events.

Image by Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Democrat Lawfare Guru Marc Elias Sues State Over Law Preventing Noncitizen Voting.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Far-left Democrat election attorney Marc Elias is suing the State of Wyoming to make it easier for noncitizens to cast ballots in state and federal elections.

👥 Who’s Involved: The State of Wyoming, Marc Elias, the Equality State Policy Center, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray.

📍 Where & When: The lawsuit was filed on Friday, May 9, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “The far-left’s lawsuit is a meritless attempt to undermine the common-sense election integrity measures Wyomingites want. Proof of citizenship and proof of residency are common-sense measures pivotal to election integrity,” said Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray in response to the court filing.

⚠️ Impact: Wyoming’s proof of citizenship requirement was passed into law in March. If Elias’s lawsuit is successful, it would mean that noncitizens would only need to assert they are legally allowed to vote in order to cast a ballot in elections held in the state.

IN FULL:

Democrat lawfare operative and elections attorney Marc Elias has filed a lawsuit against the State of Wyoming to make it easier for noncitizens to vote in the state’s elections. Elias’s lawsuit targets a new state law that will soon take effect and requires those registering to vote to provide election officials with documented proof of citizenship. These documents can include a U.S. passport, naturalization papers, a birth certificate, and other official government forms of identification only available to citizens.

“When HB 156 becomes effective, it will impose new, burdensome, and entirely unnecessary requirements that will make it harder for eligible citizens to vote,” the lawsuit, filed by Elias, along with the Equality State Policy Center and American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), reads. “Women—as well as Hispanic, young, and low-income voters—are less likely to have acceptable documentation and, in many cases, face greater hurdles to obtaining it,” it claims.

Notably, the Elias lawsuit raises one of the Democratic Party’s newest anti-election integrity talking points, which claims Voter I.D. and measures ensuring only citizens vote discriminate against married women. The lawsuit contends that women who have taken their husbands’ last names are more likely to be turned away from polling places, despite little evidence of this actually occurring.

The lawsuit also contends that the new law is duplicative, as Wyoming and the U.S. federal government already require voters to attest to their eligibility to vote with a sworn statement. Proponents of the document requirements counter that the provision adds an extra layer of security by requiring evidence that a voter is a citizen beyond their mere word.

Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray has pledged to defend the document requirement in court. He blasted Elias and his co-filers, stating: “The far-left’s lawsuit is a meritless attempt to undermine the common-sense election integrity measures Wyomingites want. Proof of citizenship and proof of residency are common-sense measures pivotal to election integrity.”

Image by Jewish Democratic Council of America.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Episcopal Church Refuses to Help Refugees Because They are White.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Episcopal Church is ending its partnership with the U.S. government on refugee resettlement, refusing to assist in resettling white South African refugees.

👥 Who’s Involved: The Episcopal Church, Presiding Bishop Sean Rowe, President Donald J. Trump, and 49 Afrikaner refugees.

📍 Where & When: United States, decision announced Monday, refugees arrived the same day.

💬 Key Quote: “In light of our church’s steadfast commitment to racial justice and reconciliation… we are not able to take this step,” said Bishop Sean Rowe.

⚠️ Impact: The move ends a decades-long collaboration and highlights the Episcopal Church’s political agenda.

IN FULL:

The Episcopal Church has announced its decision to cease collaborating with the U.S. government on refugee resettlement, specifically declining to help in resettling white South African refugees. The announcement, made by Presiding Bishop Sean Rowe on Monday, marks the end of a longstanding partnership between the church’s Episcopal Migration Ministries and federal agencies.

The decision coincided with the arrival of 49 Afrikaner refugees in the United States. These individuals were granted priority resettlement status under the Trump administration, allowing them to bypass the typically lengthy waiting periods other groups face.

“In light of our church’s steadfast commitment to racial justice and reconciliation and our historic ties with the Anglican Church of Southern Africa, we are not able to take this step,” Rowe stated. He added that the church would conclude its federal refugee resettlement grant agreements by the end of the fiscal year.

President Trump has prioritized resettling white South Africans, after the South African government passed laws allowing it to seize white-owned farmland without compensation, alongside brutal violence directed at Dutch-descended Afrikaners. “It’s a genocide that’s taking place. Farmers are being killed. They happen to be white,” Trump remarked on May 12.

The move by the Episcopal Church comes just months after the Trump administration ended federal funding for Roman Catholic groups who were aiding illegal migrants and asylum seekers. Catholic Migration Services (CMS) would have received nearly $300,000 for the resettling of migrants, but this was suspended in March.

Catholic Relief Services (CRS) announced in February that it would face major layoffs due to its reliance on money from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). President Trump halted USAID funding for a multitude of woke projects and organizations shortly after his inauguration.

Image by Diocese of Bethlehem.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump Inks $600 Billion Economic Partnership Deal with Saudi Arabia.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: U.S. President Donald J. Trump has signed an economic partnership agreement with Saudi Arabia early in his Middle East tour.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Trump and Mohammed Bin Salman, Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister.

📍 Where & When: The agreement was signed at the Royal Court in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on Tuesday, May 13, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “President Trump is the dealmaker in chief, and he has once again secured a historic deal that strengthens America’s economic dominance and global influence.” — White House statement.

⚠️ Impact: The agreement secures a $600 billion commitment from Saudi Arabia to invest in the United States.

IN FULL:

U.S. President Donald J. Trump initiated his four-day Middle East tour by signing an economic partnership agreement with Saudi Arabia on Tuesday. The signing ceremony took place at the Royal Court in Riyadh, where President Trump met with Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed Bin Salman.

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) underscores a commitment to fostering closer economic ties between the United States and Saudi Arabia. According to the White House, the deal has secured $600 billion in investment commitments from the Saudis. Billions of dollars in U.S. exports have been secured, including Boeing 737-8 and gas turbines.

A “defense and security partnership” is a key feature of the deal, with “extensive training and support to build the capacity of the Saudi armed forces” provided alongside nearly $142 billion in “state-of-the-art warfighting equipment and services from over a dozen U.S. defense firms.”

The meeting marks the beginning of Trump’s Middle East tour, which aims to strengthen regional alliances and explore opportunities for cooperation, trade, and investments across various sectors.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump Scraps Biden Regulations, Saving Consumers $11BN+.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Trump administration announced the reversal of dozens of appliance energy regulations, saving consumers over $11 billion and removing 125,000 words from federal regulations.

👥 Who’s Involved: The Department of Energy, headed by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, under President Donald J. Trump’s leadership; former Joe Biden-era Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm.

📍 Where & When: The action was announced on Monday, with regulations impacting households and businesses across the United States.

💬 Key Quote: “It should not be the government’s place to decide what kind of appliances you or your restaurants or your businesses can buy,” said Energy Secretary Chris Wright.

⚠️ Impact: The move prioritizes consumer choice and free markets over Biden-era climate-driven appliance restrictions, reversing rules on gas stoves, dishwashers, shower heads, and more.

IN FULL:

The Trump administration has rolled back a series of Joe Biden-era energy regulations targeting household appliances, in a move announced Monday that will save consumers over $11 billion and eliminate more than 125,000 words from federal regulations.

The Department of Energy (DOE) confirmed the reversal of rules restricting sales of certain gas stoves, ovens, dishwashers, faucets, and other appliances. The Biden government implemented these regulations as part of its broader climate change agenda, pushing consumers toward electrification and away from natural gas reliance.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright emphasized the importance of consumer freedom, stating, “It should not be the government’s place to decide what kind of appliances you or your restaurants or your businesses can buy.” Wright added that the Trump administration is working to “bring back common sense” and reduce regulatory burdens that he described as elitist and counterproductive.

The action also includes streamlining regulations related to natural gas imports and exports, approvals for electric energy exports, and procedures for purchasing Strategic Petroleum Reserve oil stocks.

“Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, we are bringing back common sense—slashing regulations meant to appease Green New Deal fantasies, restrict consumer choice, and increase costs for the American people,” Wright said.

The move comes after President Trump ended Biden’s anti-coal policies to boost American energy production and dismantle the woke Green agenda of the former Democratic administration.

Image by Ivan Radic. 

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

MAGA Welcomes South African Refugees – VIDEO.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: Dozens of white South Africans, specifically Afrikaners, arrived in the U.S. on May 11 as refugees under a program initiated by the Trump administration.

👥 Who’s Involved: 49 Afrikaners, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, U.S. President Donald Trump, and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.

📍 Where & When: The group departed South Africa on May 11, arriving in Washington, D.C., and is heading to Texas.

💬 Key Quote: “Refugees from South Africa. Notice these are actual families. Men, women and children who will easily assimilate and appreciate the United States. Stark contrast between the hordes of single men who were coming to abuse our system.”

⚠️ Impact: This marks the first relocation of Afrikaner refugees to the U.S. under a program addressing race-based persecution in South Africa.

IN FULL:

A group of 49 Afrikaners, members of South Africa’s white ethnic minority, arrived in the United States on May 11 after being granted refugee status under a program initiated by President Donald J. Trump. The group departed South Africa on a chartered flight bound for Washington, D.C., before continuing to Texas, according to South African Transport Department spokesman Collen Msibi.

This marks the first relocation of Afrikaners under a refugee admissions program established by Trump’s February 7 executive order. The order allows for the resettlement of Afrikaner refugees fleeing what the president described as “government-sponsored race-based discrimination.”

The program was introduced following South African President Cyril Ramaphosa’s signing of the Expropriation Act in January. The legislation permits the redistribution of certain unused lands, a move aimed at addressing racial disparities in land ownership rooted in the apartheid era. The South African government has emphasized that specific conditions must be met before expropriating land, such as where land has been abandoned or is being held for speculation.

“Refugees from South Africa. Notice these are actual families. Men, women and children who will easily assimilate and appreciate the United States. Stark contrast between the hordes of single men who were coming to abuse our system,” wrote Geiger Capital on X.

Trump has been vocal about the situation, describing it as a “genocide” and highlighting the violence faced by white farmers. “White farmers are being brutally killed and their land is being confiscated. And the media doesn’t even talk about it,” he said in March.

The South African government has falsely dismissed these claims, labeling the U.S. refugee program as “politically motivated.” It stated, “Allegations of discrimination are unfounded… these do not meet the threshold of persecution required under domestic and international refugee law.” In reality, white farmers in South Africa have been exposed to major racial violence for decades.

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller defended the program, asserting that the Afrikaners’ situation constitutes “race-based persecution.” He said, “What was happening in South Africa fits the textbook definition of why the refugee program was created.”

In March, Trump also announced plans to cut federal funding to South Africa over its expropriation policies. The White House warned that aid would cease if South Africa “continues to support bad actors on the world stage and allows violent attacks on innocent disfavored minority farmers.”

show less
PULSE POINTS: show more

WATCH: Leftists Clash With Cops Outside Major U.S. Migrant Facility.

🧭 PULSE POINTS:

WHAT HAPPENED: Far-left agitators clashed with police at the Delaney Hall ICE detention center Monday afternoon in Newark, blocking emergency vehicles and forcing their way toward the facility’s outer gates.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The agitators confronted Newark police and other law enforcement officers stationed at the site.

⚠️FALLOUT: Protesters barricaded entrances, impeded ambulance access, and shoved through barriers in a series of confrontations with officers.

📌SIGNIFICANCE: The unrest follows last week’s high-profile incident involving Democratic Reps. Watson Coleman, Menendez Jr., and McIver—who entered the facility as Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested outside. Tensions surrounding the GEO Group-run ICE center continue to escalate.

📰 IN FULL:

Tensions erupted again at the Delaney Hall ICE detention facility in Newark on Monday as far-left agitators clashed with police during a fresh wave of protests.

In the early afternoon, demonstrators barricaded entrances to the facility and blocked access for emergency vehicles, including ambulances. Video from the scene shows activists shoving through outer gates and confronting law enforcement officers attempting to maintain order.

The incident marks a sharp continuation of unrest surrounding Delaney Hall, which reopened May 1 under a federal contract with the private prison firm GEO Group. Just days ago, three Democratic members of Congress—Bonnie Watson Coleman, Robert Menendez Jr., and LaMonica McIver—entered the facility. At the same time, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested after being denied entry. The confrontation sparked legal threats from the Department of Homeland Security and widespread national attention.

Today’s clashes further underline the breakdown between federal immigration enforcement and local resistance in sanctuary jurisdictions like Newark. Delaney Hall’s reopening has faced staunch opposition from city officials and far-left activist groups, who have sought to disrupt its operations physically.

No official arrest figures or statements from Newark police had been released at the time of this report.

show less

🧭 PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump Administration Revokes Deportation Protections for Additional Refugees.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Trump administration has officially ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Afghan refugees, opening the door to deportations.

👥 Who’s Involved: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced the decision; tens of thousands of Afghans are affected.

📍 Where & When: The announcement was made on Monday, May 12, 2025, in the United States, with deportation protections expiring in 60 days.

💬 Key Quote: “This administration is returning TPS to its original temporary intent,” said Secretary Noem, adding: “Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilizing economy no longer prevents them from returning to their home country.”

⚠️ Impact: Deportation protections for Afghans will lapse, affecting tens of thousands of migrants, many of whom were resettled in Texas, California, and Virginia.

IN FULL:

The Trump administration has ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Afghan refugees, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced Monday. The move sets the stage for the potential deportation of tens of thousands of Afghans currently residing in the United States. Deportation protections will expire in 60 days, the minimum period allowed by law after such a notice is issued.

“This administration is returning TPS to its original temporary intent,” Sec. Noem stated, adding: “We’ve reviewed the conditions in Afghanistan with our interagency partners, and they do not meet the requirements for a TPS designation. Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilizing economy no longer prevents them from returning to their home country.”

The Biden government had brought approximately 76,000 Afghan nationals to the United States following the chaotic U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, a move ordered by President Joe Biden. Many of these individuals were resettled in states like Texas, California, and Virginia. Between 2010 and 2022, the Afghan population in the U.S. grew from 54,000 to 195,000, though it remains unclear how many of these individuals have obtained legal permanent residency or citizenship.

However, Noem’s analysis pointed to signs of recovery, such as Chinese tourism returning to the region, and a decline in the number of people requiring humanitarian assistance—from over 29 million last year to 23.7 million this year.

The Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program, created in 2006 and expanded in 2009, was initially designed to assist Afghan and Iraqi translators working with U.S. forces. Many of the Afghans currently in the U.S. fled during Joe Biden’s botched 2021 withdrawal, supposedly seeking refuge from Taliban reprisals.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

US Cancels Mexican Governor’s Visa as Trump-Sheinbaum Tensions Escalate.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The U.S. revoked tourist visas for Mexico’s Baja California Governor Marina del Pilar Avila and her husband, Carlos Torres.

👥 Who’s Involved: Governor Marina del Pilar Avila, her husband Carlos Torres, and the U.S. State Department.

📍 Where & When: Baja California, Mexico; announcement made on Sunday, May 11, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “I make this information public with responsibility and transparency, not only to avoid speculation but also to limit political opponents’ misuse of this situation,” Carlos Torres said.

⚠️ Impact: The visa revocation raises questions about U.S.-Mexico relations, though the issue may stem from Avila and Torres’s abuse of temporary tourism visas to conduct Mexican government business in the United States.

IN FULL:

The United States has revoked tourist visas for Marina del Pilar Avila, the governor of Mexico’s Baja California state, and her husband, Carlos Torres, who also serves as the state’s coordinator of special projects. Governor Avila announced the development on Sunday through a post to X (formerly Twitter).

Avila stated that no formal accusations, investigations, or incidents had been raised against her or her husband in either Mexico or the United States. Meanwhile, Torres claims the revocations are part of a broader pattern of administrative actions by the U.S. State Department against Mexican officials. “Currently, the application of these administrative criteria has become increasingly common and, like so many others, I am included in that universe,” Torres said.

The couple’s visas were reportedly revoked shortly after a visit to San Diego, where they promoted tourism in Baja California. While the U.S. State Department has not given an official reason for the revocation, it could stem from the couple engaging in cross-border tourism as Mexican government officials while in the United States on tourism visas.

Notably, if Avila and Torres only held B1/B2 temporary visas—used for short business trips and tourism—they would be barred from engaging in official Mexican government business while in the country. Diplomats and foreign government officials undertaking official business are required to obtain an A1/A2 visa.

Some reports suggest 2019 pictures of Avila with Emmanuel ‘El Botas’ Serrano, allegedly linked to Sinaloa Cartel boss Ismael ‘El Mayo’ Zambada, could also be a factor, although these have been public knowledge since 2022.

Torres has retained an international immigration attorney to explore legal options, including reopening or reconsidering the decision, or applying for a new visa.

Torres emphasized transparency in addressing the situation, stating, “I make this information public with responsibility and transparency, not only to avoid speculation, but also to limit political opponents’ misuse of this situation.” He also criticized political adversaries, claiming they are “willing to turn any fact into slander if they think it will give them an advantage.”

Governor Avila expressed her support for her husband, describing him as a man of integrity and dedication. “My support for him isn’t just personal, it’s moral and political,” she wrote, adding that the situation requires “composure and prudence” given the complex binational context.

The visa issue follows broader tensions between the U.S. and Mexico, including a recent dispute involving Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and her refusal to allow American military intervention in combating drug cartels. Both Avila and Torres are members of Sheinbaum’s Morena party, which has faced criticism from U.S. President Donald J. Trump.

Image by Jads28bc28.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more