Friday, June 26, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

This Bill Would Deport Green Card Migrants for Drunk Driving.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act seeks to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make noncitizens convicted of or admitting to driving under the influence offenses deportable.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The bill was introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) and has Senate sponsorship from Senator Bill Hagerty (R-TN), with support from multiple Republican senators.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Initially introduced in January, the bill passed the House in June and is now under Senate consideration.

💬KEY QUOTE: “A DUI could get green card holders deported, even from ten years ago! If it becomes law, anyone who is not a U.S. citizen—be they green card holders, international students, or H-1B workers—could become inadmissible [for citizenship] and deportable for having a DUI on record,” complained immigration attorney Joseph Tsang.

🎯IMPACT: The bill could affect green card holders, foreign students, and visa holders with past DUI records, potentially making them inadmissible for citizenship and deportable.

IN FULL

The Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act could revise the Immigration and Nationality Act to classify noncitizens, regardless of immigration status, as potentially deportable if they are convicted of or admit to driving under the influence (DUI)-related offenses. This provision would apply to illegal immigrants, lawful permanent residents, and green card holders.

Initially introduced in the House in January by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) as H.R.6976, the legislation now awaits consideration in the Senate after passing the House in June. Senator Bill Hagerty (R-TN) introduced a companion version in the Senate, with backing from several Republican senators, including Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Katie Britt (R-AL), and Tom Cotton (R-AR). Its sponsors frame the bill as a public safety initiative to deter DUI offenses among noncitizens and enhance immigration enforcement.

Supporters argue the measure strengthens the standards of moral character required for U.S. citizenship. Immigration advocates disagree, with immigration attorney Joseph Tsang complaining, “A DUI could get green card holders deported, even from ten years ago! If it becomes law, anyone who is not a U.S. citizen—be they green card holders, international students, or H-1B workers—could become inadmissible and deportable for having a DUI on record.”

The proposed law would broaden the grounds for inadmissibility to include not only convictions but also admissions to DUI-related conduct. Additionally, it would apply regardless of whether the DUI is considered a misdemeanor or felony under state, federal, or local laws.

The legislation has received support from the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which cited U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) data showing more than 43,000 noncitizens were arrested on DUI charges between 2018 and 2023.

The new act comes amid a case of an Indian truck driver who killed three people in Florida this month when trying to make a U-turn on a busy highway. It was later revealed that the Indian was allowed to remain in the United States by the former Biden regime and was granted a commercial driving license by Governor Gavin Newsom‘s California government despite being an illegal alien.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Labour Moves to Free Thousands of Killers, Rapists, and Other Dangerous Prisoners Early.

The British government plans to release thousands of prisoners early, including serious offenders, to combat prison overcrowding, sparking public outrage and widespread safety concerns.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Labour government of the United Kingdom is set to release up to 6,000 serious offenders from prison, including murderers and rapists, to tackle overcrowding.
📰 DETAIL: The first batch of criminals will be released in September. Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary David Lammy is implementing legal changes allowing these offenders to be released halfway through their sentences, rather than the current two-thirds, provided they have behaved well in prison. The prisoners being released include those convicted of rape, manslaughter, grievous bodily harm (GBH), rape, and other sex offenses. In addition, those convicted of crimes such as assault, burglary, theft, and shoplifting are set to be released after completing just one-third of their sentences, down from 40 percent. The Ministry of Justice (MOJ), roughly equivalent to the Department of Justice (DOJ), declined to provide an exact number, although recent estimates suggest between 5,000 and 7,000 will be released.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Once the MoJ starts writing to victims and saying this is what is happening, there will inevitably be individual victims who have suffered at the hands of an offender who will become very upset… They will have been expecting the person to be in prison for a much longer period, but now they are going to be out in weeks. It is not like the various previous early release schemes, where there were exclusions for particular types of offenders. This is a statutory change, so it doesn’t matter what you have been sentenced for,” said Tom Wheatley, President of the Prison Governors’ Association, a body representing high-ranking officials in Britain’s prison service.
🎯 IMPACT: The early release scheme has sparked concerns about public safety, with critics viewing it as an insult to victims and a sign that the governing Labour Party is soft on crime. The decision to release serious criminals early, combined with the Labour government’s decision to scrap many jury trials, represents another widely unpopular justice policy to define the premiership of outgoing Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Given the United Kingdom’s international reputation for arresting people for online speech, this decision paints a picture in which those who commit serious crimes are released early while those arrested for expressing strong opinions are jailed, further increasing overcrowding in the prison system.
👀 FLASHBACK: In September last year, Graham Linehan, co-creator of the comedy series Father Ted, was arrested at London’s Heathrow Airport for posts shared on the X (formerly Twitter). Earlier that same year, Vice President J.D. Vance declared that the United States would not subsidize the defense of countries where people are arrested for “mean tweets.”

Image by JV.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The British government plans to release thousands of prisoners early, including serious offenders, to combat prison overcrowding, sparking public outrage and widespread safety concerns.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

State AG Pushes to Impeach Judge for Acquitting Woman Who Drowned a Child, Because She Had COVID.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier is seeking the impeachment of Judge Miguel de la O after his controversial acquittal of a mother who drowned her child and stabbed her husband, citing temporary insanity supposedly caused by COVID-19.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has announced plans to draft articles of impeachment against Judge Miguel de la O, who acquitted Precious Bland, a mother accused of drowning her 15-month-old daughter, on grounds of temporary insanity caused by COVID-19. Bland also stabbed her husband and 16-year-old daughter. The judge’s ruling has sparked outrage, with Uthmeier and Governor Ron DeSantis (R) calling for accountability.
📺 DETAIL: Precious Bland reportedly drowned her daughter Emii in a bathtub, claiming COVID-19 and religious fears were driving her actions. She stabbed her husband when he tried to intervene and also injured her 16-year-old daughter before they escaped. Bland waived her right to a jury trial, leaving the decision solely in the hands of Judge de la O, who accepted the defense’s claim of a psychotic episode triggered by COVID-19. This case marks what Bland’s attorney believes to be the first successful COVID-related insanity defense in the U.S.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This was a bench trial. It’s time to impeach this judge. My office will be drafting articles of impeachment, and we look forward to working with all legislators who will support.” – Attorney General James Uthmeier
🎯 IMPACT: The case has ignited debate over judicial accountability and the use of COVID-19 as a defense in criminal cases. Governor DeSantis has urged the Florida House to act, signaling potential political ramifications for Judge de la O and broader implications for how similar defenses may be treated in future cases.
📺 FLASHBACK: In past cases, insanity defenses have been highly scrutinized, with courts often requiring institutionalization. However, Bland’s attorney argued against institutionalization, claiming the psychosis was temporary.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier is seeking the impeachment of Judge Miguel de la O after his controversial acquittal of a mother who drowned her child and stabbed her husband, citing temporary insanity supposedly caused by COVID-19.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ICE Pursues First of a Kind $250k Fine Against Attorney for Filing Fraudulent Asylum Claims.

The Department of Homeland Security has launched a crackdown on fraudulent asylum filings, with an attorney facing a $250,000 fine for the first time.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has initiated its first-ever financial penalty against an immigration attorney, proposing a $250,000 fine for Vinod Doddamani, who is accused of filing 64 fraudulent asylum applications in 32 cases.
📺 DETAIL: Federal investigators allege that Doddamani’s filings contained nearly identical narratives, descriptions, and supporting details, raising suspicions of systemic abuse of the asylum process. The action follows a directive from Department of Homeland Security (DHS) leadership to target legal professionals suspected of exploiting the system, which officials say exacerbates immigration court backlogs and delays the removal of criminal aliens.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Fraudulent asylum claims threaten the safety of Americans by overwhelming our burdened immigration system and delaying the removal of dangerous criminal aliens,” said DHS General Counsel James Percival.
🎯 IMPACT: This enforcement action signals a broader crackdown on immigration attorneys accused of fraud, with DHS aiming to deter similar abuses nationwide. “By holding [Doddamani] accountable, we are sending a message to other immigration attorneys who engage in fraud across the country: your days of abusing and defrauding our immigration system are over,” said DHS General Counsel James Percival. Such efforts could improve the efficiency of processing legitimate asylum claims, while addressing public concerns about the integrity of the immigration system.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Homeland Security has launched a crackdown on fraudulent asylum filings, with an attorney facing a $250,000 fine for the first time.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DHS Marks Arrest of Over 10K Gang Members Since Trump Returned to Office.

The Department of Homeland Security announced a milestone of 10,000 gang member arrests by ICE since President Trump’s second term began, underscoring the administration’s efforts to combat violent criminals and illegal immigration.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has arrested over 10,000 gang members since President Donald J. Trump began his second term in January 2025. The milestone arrest was of Javier Hernandez Rosas, an MS-13 gang member from Mexico with a criminal record that includes possession of cocaine, abduction, and weapons charges.
📺 DETAIL: ICE detailed the arrests of gang members involved in crimes such as murder, drug trafficking, extortion, and robbery. Among those apprehended were MS-13 and Tren de Aragua (TDA) gang members, many of whom are wanted in their home countries for violent offenses, including aggravated murder and racketeering. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin credited the Secure America Act for enhancing ICE’s ability to remove dangerous criminals from American communities.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Thanks to the Secure America Act, ICE is turbocharged to arrest even more gang members and criminals from American neighborhoods.” – DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin
🎯 IMPACT: The arrests are a significant step in reducing gang violence and protecting American communities from the crimes committed by illegal alien gang members. This effort underscores the Trump administration’s commitment to enforcing immigration laws and ensuring public safety in neighborhoods across the nation.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Homeland Security announced a milestone of 10,000 gang member arrests by ICE since President Trump’s second term began, underscoring the administration's efforts to combat violent criminals and illegal immigration.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Alleged Palisades Fire Arsonist Wanted to Punish ‘The Wealthy’ for ‘Destroying the World.’

The trial of Jonathan Rinderknecht, who has been accused of igniting the Lachman Fire, which erupted into the deadly Palisades Fire on New Year’s Day 2025, could result in a 45-year prison sentence. However, the jury is reportedly deadlocked.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Prosecutors have claimed that Jonathan Rinderknecht, who allegedly started the Lachman Fire, which burned down much of the Pacific Palisades in Los Angeles County, California, was motivated by his hatred of “the wealthy.” As of the time of writing, reports indicate the jury in the case is deadlocked.
📺 DETAIL: Jury deliberations began on Wednesday. The prosecution portrayed Rinderknecht as embittered by personal failures and societal grievances. According to witnesses, the accused was “a troubled, angry man, increasingly bitter about failed relationships, low finances, the current administration, and a dystopian society he believed was divided by cruel corporate overseers who had built a wall between the wealthy and everyone else.” Specifically, the prosecution alleged that Rinderknecht’s actions were motivated by a hatred of the wealthy. According to Assistant United States Attorney Danbee Kim, Rinderknecht had a “deeply entrenched belief that the wealthy were destroying the world,” and he viewed the Palisades neighborhood in California as symbolic of the wealthy elite. The Palisades Fire erupted in January 2025 after firefighters failed to extinguish the Lachman Fire, which was started on New Year’s Eve. Firefighters falsely believed that they had extinguished the fire, which smoldered for six days. The fire killed 12 people and destroyed large areas of Pacific Palisades and Malibu. The fire burned roughly 24,000 acres and caused $150 billion in damages.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The Pacific Palisades neighborhood represented all of that [corporate wealth and worldly destruction],” – Assistant U.S. Attorney Danbee Kim, summarizing Rinderknecht’s alleged justification and view of the Pacific Palisades
🎯 IMPACT: If convicted on all three arson charges, Rinderknecht could face up to 45 years in prison. In a summary of Rinderknecht’s answers during questioning, investigators wrote: “[Rinderknecht] responded that it would be out of resentment of the rich enjoying their money as ‘we’re basically being enslaved by them.'” This case could potentially represent another instance of far-left terrorism, comparable to the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, allegedly carried out by Luigi Mangione.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The trial of Jonathan Rinderknecht, who has been accused of igniting the Lachman Fire, which erupted into the deadly Palisades Fire on New Year's Day 2025, could result in a 45-year prison sentence. However, the jury is reportedly deadlocked.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Apple Announces Huge Price Hikes, Citing Soaring Chip Costs.

Apple has announced price increases on several products, citing rising memory chip costs and supply chain challenges, with industry experts predicting similar moves by other brands.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Apple has raised prices on several products, including the MacBook Pro with one terabyte of storage, which increased from $1,699 to $1,999 in the U.S., and the entry-level Neo laptop in the United Kingdom, which rose from £599 to £699 (~$790 to ~$920). The company attributed the increases to rising costs of key components, particularly memory chips.
📺 DETAIL: Industry analysts said the move highlights how the artificial intelligence (AI) boom is affecting consumer electronics, with even Apple unable to avoid rising component costs. Chipmaker TSMC has also warned that inflation and higher production expenses could lead to further increases across the sector. Analysts expect other PC and tablet manufacturers to follow suit through price rises, reduced discounts, or a greater focus on premium products. Apple believes its loyal customer base will largely absorb the increases, while outgoing chief executive Tim Cook recently described current memory chip pricing as “unsustainable” and said higher prices were unavoidable.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Even Apple, with its scale and buying power, is no longer immune to the rising cost of key components,” said tech analyst Paolo Pescatore.
🎯 IMPACT: The price increases could set a precedent for other PC and tablet manufacturers. While Apple’s loyal customer base is expected to absorb the hikes without significant backlash, the broader tech industry may face challenges in maintaining affordability.

Image by relux.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Apple has announced price increases on several products, citing rising memory chip costs and supply chain challenges, with industry experts predicting similar moves by other brands.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Iran Attacks Ship in Strait of Hormuz, Defying U.S. Deal.

An attack on a commercial vessel by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in the Strait of Hormuz has raised tensions and cast doubt on a recent memorandum of understanding between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has attacked a Singapore-flagged commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, despite the memorandum of understanding with the United States.
📺 DETAIL: The attack occurred on Thursday off the coast of Dahit, Oman, at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping chokepoint. Approximately 20 percent of oil exports pass through the Strait of Hormuz. The attack follows a memorandum between the United States and Iran to end the conflict between the two countries, which began in late February, and facilitate safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz for 60 days. The ship’s bridge was reportedly damaged by an “unknown projectile.” No casualties were reported, according to the United Kingdom’s Maritime Trade Operations Centre. The incident has disrupted shipping operations in the region. Following the attack, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), an agency of the United Nations (UN) that regulates international shipping, temporarily paused an evacuation plan for stranded vessels in the Persian Gulf “to reconfirm that the necessary safety guarantees continue to be in place.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The safety of the seafarers remains paramount… Therefore, to ensure a coordinated approach and navigational safety, the evacuation plan will be paused until further clarity is obtained,” – Arsenio Dominguez, Secretary-General of the IMO.
🎯 IMPACT: The attacks follow a warning from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. “If ships are moving as they should be moving, then that’s what we’re going to judge, and that’s what we’re going to react to… If, on the other hand, this rhetoric is backed up by actual ships being threatened and ships are not moving, that’s a violation of the agreement, and we’re going to have a problem with it,” said Secretary Rubio earlier on Thursday. The attack casts further uncertainty on the stability of the recent agreement between the U.S. and Iran, which is aimed at ending the conflict. Specifically, the attack is likely to complicate the ongoing dispute over shipping routes. The U.S. wants to allow vessels to sail freely along the Omani coastline, while Iran is opposed, arguing that all vessels should seek permission before entering the Strait of Hormuz.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

An attack on a commercial vessel by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in the Strait of Hormuz has raised tensions and cast doubt on a recent memorandum of understanding between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Wants $88 Billion for Iran War, Ebola, and Farm Support.

President Donald J. Trump has submitted a significant emergency funding request to Congress, aimed at addressing military, agricultural, and global health priorities following Operation Epic Fury.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has formally requested $87.6 billion in supplemental appropriations from Congress to cover expenses related to the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran, economic relief for American farmers, and the Ebola outbreak in Africa. The funding aims to replenish military stockpiles, assist farmers affected by economic and weather challenges, and support humanitarian efforts in Africa.
📺 DETAIL: The largest portion of the request, $67.1 billion, would go to the Pentagon to replenish munitions stockpiles, fund military operations, strengthen cybersecurity capabilities, and support classified programs following Operation Epic Fury, the joint U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran. The package also includes $11.1 billion for agricultural assistance, including aid for crop producers and Florida farmers affected by storms, and $1.4 billion for Ebola response efforts in Africa. Additional funding would support infrastructure projects, including $1 billion for the modernization of New York City’s Penn Station and $500 million for restoration projects in Washington, D.C. The administration said the request addresses urgent national security, economic, and public health priorities, while describing the Iran campaign as a strategic success. However, the proposal faces an uncertain path in Congress, where Democrats have largely opposed funding the conflict and some Republicans have questioned its costs and long-term benefits.
🎯 IMPACT: The funding request faces a challenging path in Congress, where bipartisan support is required. While many Republicans back military and farm aid, divisions remain over the war’s execution and costs. Democrats are expected to resist the proposal, citing concerns over the necessity and legality of the Iran campaign.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Donald J. Trump has submitted a significant emergency funding request to Congress, aimed at addressing military, agricultural, and global health priorities following Operation Epic Fury.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Under-Secretary Rogers Backs Britain: ‘Our Greatness Comes From You.’

Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy Sarah B. Rogers invoked shared British-American traditions and Brexit in a call for Britain to assert its national character and reject decline.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Sarah B. Rogers, U.S. Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, addressed the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC) Conference in London, England, on Thursday, urging Britain to embrace its national character and regain its greatness. She drew parallels between Brexit and the American Revolution, emphasizing shared British-American values and traditions.
📺 DETAIL: Drawing on her family’s roots in Yorkshire and her descent from Mayflower governor William Bradford, Rogers compared Brexit to the Pilgrims’ decision to leave Europe in order to preserve their identity. She said Brexit voters sought to overturn what she described as a “fake consensus” on issues including immigration, energy, and development, but argued that many of the changes they expected had not materialized. Referring to criticism of Britain as the “Yookay,” she acknowledged concerns over free speech while insisting the country’s national character remained resilient, citing George Orwell’s essay The English People. “Our language, our civic associational norms, our laws and our intuitions about greatness—about what has made our civilization great and about what it means to be great again—they come from you,” she said, adding: “Britain created the rights and freedoms it bequeathed to America through the greatness of her people alone. We share them with you, and we’ve got plenty to lend, if stocks run low.
💬 KEY QUOTE:Britain will be great again because her people already are,” Rogers declared.
🎯 IMPACT: Rogers’ remarks are likely to resonate with those advocating for a stronger post-Brexit Britain, while also serving as a critique of the country’s current leadership, and policies that have failed to deliver on Brexit’s potential. Her comments echo those of President Donald J. Trump during King Charles III’s recent state visit to America, where he also emphasized the shared heritage of Britain and America.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy Sarah B. Rogers invoked shared British-American traditions and Brexit in a call for Britain to assert its national character and reject decline.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK Govt Wants Cattle Farmers to Transition to Growing Oilseeds to Save the Climate.

Labour’s new farming roadmap calls for a shift away from cattle farming to plant-based agriculture, sparking backlash from farmers and rural campaigners.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Britain’s leftist Labour government has released a new Farming Roadmap calling for British farmers to reduce high-emission farming, such as cattle raising, and transition to producing plant-based products like oilseeds and pulses. The roadmap aims to align agriculture with government climate goals.
📺 DETAIL: The 71-page strategy, published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), also promotes migrant labor for fruit picking through the end of the decade. Ministers claim farmers can play a key role in meeting climate goals, but the plans have drawn criticism from cattle farmers. Berkshire cattle farmer Henry Graham argued in comments to the British press that much grazing land is unsuitable for growing crops such as lentils, while National Farmers Union (NFU) chief executive Tom Bradshaw said the roadmap lacks clear delivery mechanisms and places too much financial risk on farmers. Rural campaigner Clive Bailye added that uncertainty surrounding Labour’s inheritance tax changes targeting family farms continues to undermine confidence and investment across the sector. Environment Secretary Emma Reynolds defended the strategy, claiming it was developed through extensive consultation with farmers, growers, and land managers.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The idea of somebody plowing up pasture to grow lentils is ludicrous.” – Henry Graham, Berkshire farmer
📈 DATA: Chicken consumption has increased by 3.6 percent since 2024, while beef consumption has only declined by one percent in the past year, underscoring the continued demand for meat in the United Kingdom.

Image by Philip Halling.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Labour's new farming roadmap calls for a shift away from cattle farming to plant-based agriculture, sparking backlash from farmers and rural campaigners.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.