The Biden government is set to announce a $1.25 billion military aid package for Ukraine, according to U.S. officials. The announcement is expected on Monday as the Biden regime aims to blow more cash on a losing war before the transition of power on January 20. The aid package is expected to include munitions for the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems, the HAWK air defense system, Stinger missiles, and artillery rounds.
This fresh funding comes amid new Russian assaults on Ukraine’s power infrastructure. Despite recent missile and drone attacks, Ukrainian forces reported successful interception efforts. Meanwhile, intense combat continues near the Russian border region of Kursk.
The aid package uses the presidential drawdown authority, enabling another swift transfer of weapons to Ukraine. With the new package, approximately $4.35 billion remains in the Pentagon’s allocation for Ukraine, which previously Congress approved.
Additionally, there is $1.2 billion in funding under the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, intended for longer-term weapons contracts. The current regime plans to release these funds by year-end. If completed, total U.S. security assistance to Ukraine would exceed $64 billion since the onset of the conflict in February 2022.
show less
The Biden government is set to announce a $1.25 billion military aid package for Ukraine, according to U.S. officials. The announcement is expected on Monday as the Biden regime aims to blow more cash on a losing war before the transition of power on January 20. The aid package is expected to include munitions for the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems, the HAWK air defense system, Stinger missiles, and artillery rounds.
show more
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was reportedly refused the opportunity to brief President Joe Biden on evidence suggesting a lab leak as the origin of COVID-19, according to allegations made on Thursday. Jason Bannan, a former senior FBI scientist, claimed the agency expected an invitation to the National Intelligence Council (NIC) briefing due to its assessment that a laboratory origin was more probable. Bannan expressed surprise at the exclusion, noting the FBI had the highest confidence in its analysis regarding the pandemic’s source.
In response, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence stated that the intelligence community had presented diverse perspectives to the President, including the NIC’s view that COVID-19 likely originated from animal-to-human transmission. This assessment, however, was made with low confidence. The agency’s spokesman said it is against standard practice to invite representatives from individual agencies to presidential briefings.
President Biden initiated an investigation into the virus’s origin in May 2021, including various intelligence bodies and national laboratories. The FBI’s findings, which indicated a lab leak was the probable cause, were given moderate confidence. Despite this, the differing viewpoint from the NIC, favoring natural transmission, was communicated to the President.
Bannan, now retired, advocates for a re-analysis of the lab leak evidence, suggesting that crucial data was possibly overlooked.
The joint U.S. review completed in August 2021 concluded that fully understanding the virus’s origin would be challenging without greater cooperation from China. To date, China has participated in a joint study with the World Health Organization, which suggested the virus most likely transferred from bats to humans via another animal.
show less
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was reportedly refused the opportunity to brief President Joe Biden on evidence suggesting a lab leak as the origin of COVID-19, according to allegations made on Thursday. Jason Bannan, a former senior FBI scientist, claimed the agency expected an invitation to the National Intelligence Council (NIC) briefing due to its assessment that a laboratory origin was more probable. Bannan expressed surprise at the exclusion, noting the FBI had the highest confidence in its analysis regarding the pandemic's source.
show more
The U.S. Marshals Service has ceased a government-funded security detail for Anthony Fauci, marking the end of a $15 million arrangement in place over the past two years. The security detail was funded by taxpayers, coinciding with Fauci’s retirement, during which he received an annual pension approaching $500,000. This decision follows Fauci’s public acknowledgment in a book tour that he harbors concerns about potential threats to his life.
Fauci, who became a figure of intense mockery due to his lies during the COVID-19 pandemic, has transitioned to self-funded security measures. He has been frequently accompanied by security, with protection visible outside his residence–a move never needed by public servants who have served the taxpayer well.
U.S. Marshals declined to disclose specific threat information but confirmed that Fauci had assumed responsibility for his security expenses.
The cessation of Fauci’s security detail comes amid broader government efforts to reduce expenditures. Initiatives such as the DOGE program, introduced under President Trump’s administration, aim to address perceived inefficiencies in government spending. Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama has emphasized the need to review security allocations, labeling the previous arrangement for Fauci as disproportionate. Similarly, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, a noted critic of Fauci, has questioned the allocation of resources for his security, pointing to his own experiences with threats without comparable protection.
show less
The U.S. Marshals Service has ceased a government-funded security detail for Anthony Fauci, marking the end of a $15 million arrangement in place over the past two years. The security detail was funded by taxpayers, coinciding with Fauci's retirement, during which he received an annual pension approaching $500,000. This decision follows Fauci's public acknowledgment in a book tour that he harbors concerns about potential threats to his life.
show more
Incoming FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, tapped by President Trump, has blasted ABC News and its parent company, Disney, following a humiliating $15 million defamation settlement related to the network’s coverage of Trump. In a scathing letter to Disney CEO Robert Iger, Carr criticized the network’s conduct as emblematic of the national media’s cratering trustworthiness, with public confidence in mass media hitting a historic low of 31 percent, according to Gallup.
Carr’s remarks spotlight ABC’s lack of credibility, particularly in light of its recent legal loss to Trump, where the network admitted regret over statements made by George Stephanopoulos during a high-profile interview. The debacle, Carr argues, epitomizes the arrogance of national media organizations that have eroded public trust while treating accountability as optional.
But Carr’s criticism extends beyond past missteps. He lambasts ABC’s ongoing negotiations with local affiliate stations, accusing the network of leveraging its power to impose harsh financial demands that harm local broadcasters—outlets still widely trusted by Americans across the political spectrum. The Commissioner also highlighted reports that ABC is using these negotiations to redirect local revenue toward propping up its direct-to-consumer streaming platforms like Disney+ and Hulu.
“This isn’t how Congress envisioned the system working,” Carr warned, calling ABC’s tactics a betrayal of the public interest. He pledged that the FCC would intervene if national networks like ABC continue exploiting their affiliates at the expense of local communities.
Carr’s strong rebuke sets the stage for a showdown between Trump’s FCC and media conglomerates that have long dominated the news landscape. As ABC reels from the fallout of its Trump settlement, the network now faces a potential reckoning not only in public perception but also in regulatory oversight.
READ IN FULL:
show less
Incoming FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, tapped by President Trump, has blasted ABC News and its parent company, Disney, following a humiliating $15 million defamation settlement related to the network’s coverage of Trump. In a scathing letter to Disney CEO Robert Iger, Carr criticized the network’s conduct as emblematic of the national media’s cratering trustworthiness, with public confidence in mass media hitting a historic low of 31 percent, according to Gallup.
show more
Former Assistant Attorney General Jeff Clark has obtained documents linking the Arizona Attorney General’s office with the States United Democracy Center—a far-left non-profit lawfare group associated with attorney Norm Eisen, a key figure in President Donald J. Trump’s first sham impeachment. The documents appear to be a retainer agreement from States United to advise the Arizona Attorney General’s office on lawfare aimed to suppress critics of how the state conducts its elections and those who might question the results.
“This letter explains and confirms the terms and conditions under which States United Democracy Center (‘States United’) will undertake to advise the Arizona Attorney General’s Office (‘you’, ‘your’) in connection with developing legal strategies to ensure the integrity and security of elections,” the letter of understanding reads. Although the primary attorneys assigned to coordinate with the attorney general’s office are redacted, the States United letter notes other attorneys or non-attorney staff with the lawfare non-profit “may handle various portions of this matter pro bono or otherwise…”
The letter confirming the partnership was sent just nine days before Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes (D) secured a sprawling series of indictments against 18 individuals associated with President Trump over allegations they attempted to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Notably, the grand jury empaneled by Mayes went much further than the Democrat attorney general intended, indicting both Trump campaign attorney Christina Bobb and Jenna Ellis—both of whom were told by Mayes’s office that they were not under investigation.
Meanwhile, Eisen—the executive chair of States United—has a long record of anti-Trump actions. In April 2024, The National Pulse reported that Eisen hosted a weekly conference call of globalist leaders and Deep State apparachiks to strategize on how to expand the lawfare campaign against Trump.
READ:
I’ve come into the possession of documents showing that the Arizona AG Office is working on its election lawfare with the group founded by JournoLawfare™️ and color revolution leader Norm Eisen. https://t.co/K7DvUUlnp0pic.twitter.com/8pTlgk9gkN
Former Assistant Attorney General Jeff Clark has obtained documents linking the Arizona Attorney General's office with the States United Democracy Center—a far-left non-profit lawfare group associated with attorney Norm Eisen, a key figure in President Donald J. Trump’s first sham impeachment. The documents appear to be a retainer agreement from States United to advise the Arizona Attorney General's office on lawfare aimed to suppress critics of how the state conducts its elections and those who might question the results.
show more
Two moderate Republicans on the House Ethics Committee are believed to have colluded with their Democrat colleagues in a secret vote to release the committee’s report on former Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-FL). Representatives Dave Joyce (R-OH) and Andrew Garbarino (R-NY)—both close allies of ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and named by him to the Ethics Committee in January of 2023—backed the report’s release, according to Axios.
The two Republican Congressmen were among a series of McCarthy lieutenants placed in key committees and tasked with imposing the then-Speaker’s will on the Republican-controlled House. However, it appears their charge changed after Rep. Gaetz toppled McCarthy’s speakership in October of 2023, using a motion to vacate against the California Republican. While both Joyce and Garbarino initially appear to have voted against releasing the ethics report—likely because current House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) weighed in against making the document public—their about-face suggests potential pressure from either McCarthy himself or his allies.
In November, several ex-McCarthy staffers and lawmakers aligned with the former Speaker celebrated when Gaetz was forced to withdraw from consideration for U.S. Attorney General. Rep. Michale Lawler (R-NY) declared in a post on X (formerly Twitter), “Justice has been served.” This was echoed by former McCarthy aide Brittany Martinez.
Meanwhile, Rep. Joyce appears to have serious ethical issues himself. The Ohio Republican is accused of 136 violations of the STOCK Act, which aims to prevent lawmakers from engaging in insider trading. While the House Ethics Committee has jurisdiction to take action against these violations, it appears Joyce has enjoyed an explicit lack of investigation into his stock trading. Even more troubling, Joyce was the lone member of the Ohio Republican Congressional delegation to vote against holding Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress.
Two moderate Republicans on the House Ethics Committee are believed to have colluded with their Democrat colleagues in a secret vote to release the committee's report on former Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-FL). Representatives Dave Joyce (R-OH) and Andrew Garbarino (R-NY)—both close allies of ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and named by him to the Ethics Committee in January of 2023—backed the report's release, according to Axios.
show more
A Florida businessman who is a key figure in the sex and drug allegations against former Congressman Matt Gaetz has called the House Ethics Committee’s biased investigation report “reckless,” demanding the retraction of multiple “demonstrably false statements,” The National Pulse can reveal.
Lawyers representing Christopher Dorworth note that former Congressman Gaetz is not even under the Committee’s jurisdiction before explaining in a letter sent just hours after the committee’s report was leaked to the corporate media that it contains at least three falsehoods.
The first involves an allegation that Gaetz invited people to Dorworth’s home on July 15, 2017. Dorworth states that Gaetz did not invite anyone to his home and that the Committee’s evidence that he did is “a gate log that doesn’t include Gaetz’s name on it” and references to “an affidavit and deposition transcripts that say nothing about Gaetz inviting anyone to [Dorworth’s] home.”
Another claim is that Dorworth was confronted with cell phone records during his deposition, but Dorthworth denies this occurred. The records, lawyers claim, were deemed “Attorneys eyes only” and were not reviewed by Dorworth or experts.
Finally, Dorworth’s lawyers note that the Committee claims it “requested, through counsel, that Mr. Dorworth clarify his testimony regarding his whereabouts on the evening of July 15, 2017; his counsel did not respond.” They say they did, in fact, send an email to Committee staff that included exculpatory documents supporting both Dorworth and Gaetz’s public statements regarding the accusations.
The letter concludes by noting disappointment, but not surprise, at “the haphazard and careless manner in which [the Committee’s] was drafted and now published,” branding it “sloppy.”
The report on the Committee investigation into Gaetz was leaked to the media over the weekend, with several outlets publishing claims that Gaetz paid for sex from women and purchased illegal drugs. Gaetz denies the allegations and notes that the Biden-Harris Justice Department (DOJ) declined to charge him with anything.
On Monday, December 23, Gaetz filed a lawsuit against the Committee to prevent the publication of the report, arguing that the Committee not only does not have jurisdiction over him but that he would suffer reputational and professional damage from the report.
A Florida businessman who is a key figure in the sex and drug allegations against former Congressman Matt Gaetz has called the House Ethics Committee's biased investigation report "reckless," demanding the retraction of multiple "demonstrably false statements," The National Pulse can reveal.
show more
Luigi Mangione pleaded “not guilty” in a Manhattan court on Monday, where he faces state murder and terrorism charges in the shooting death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. The arraignment follows formal charges filed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg accusing Mangione of multiple forms of murder, including murder as an act of terrorism.
The state case is set to proceed alongside a separate federal prosecution—with the latter potentially resulting in Mangione receiving the death penalty. However, Mangione only faces life imprisonment without parole in the state prosecution as New York abolished its death penalty in 2004.
Mangione allegedly executed Thompson in midtown Manhattan on December 4, as the CEO was en route to an investor conference. Following a five-day search, law enforcement apprehended Mangione at a McDonald’s in Pennsylvania. He possessed a gun matching the weapon used in the shooting, along with a fake ID and a notebook detailing grievances against the health insurance industry.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg highlighted the murder’s intent to cause fear and garner attention to justify the use of terrorism charges. Meanwhile, Mangione’s lawyer, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, criticized the differing legal approaches by federal and state prosecutors, describing them as “confusing” and “highly unusual.”
Mangione, held at a Brooklyn federal jail, was extradited from Pennsylvania and brought to New York City with heavy security. Additionally, New York Mayor Eric Adams personally confronted Mangione, emphasizing the impact of his actions on the city.
An Ivy League graduate from Maryland, Mangione reportedly became isolated from his family and friends over the last year. Online posts attributed to him suggest personal struggles, particularly with back pain. There is no record of him being a UnitedHealthcare client.
show less
Luigi Mangione pleaded "not guilty" in a Manhattan court on Monday, where he faces state murder and terrorism charges in the shooting death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. The arraignment follows formal charges filed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg accusing Mangione of multiple forms of murder, including murder as an act of terrorism.
show more
Former Congressman Matt Gaetz has filed a lawsuit against the House Ethics Committee to prevent the public release of their investigation into discredited sexual and drug misconduct allegations. However, some news outlets have already published details of the investigation.
Gaetz filed a temporary restraining order on Monday, December 23, in a 40-page filing, warning that the report could contain “potentially defamatory allegations” and arguing that the release goes against the Ethics Commission’s own rules. He also stressed that he was not subject to the committee’s jurisdiction as a private citizen.
The former congressman also notes that the committee refused to inform him ahead of time that the investigation would be made public and stated that the media coverage would be “immediate and widespread” and could damage Gaetz’s reputation and professional standing.
CBS News claims to have access to the investigation report and that the commission found Gaetz had paid several women for sex and purchased illegal narcotics. One of the women involved is said to have been 17 at the time.
However, POLITICO has stated that the report did not find sufficient evidence to show Gaetz violated federal sex trafficking laws. Notably, even the Biden-Harris Justice Department declined to press charges against Gaetz, finding the evidence for the allegations “unreliable.”
The highly biased report, instigated by former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, was blasted by Gaetz on X. “There is a reason they did this to me in a Christmas Eve-Eve report and not in a courtroom of any kind where I could present evidence and challenge witnesses,” he said.
DOUBLE STANDARDS.
The release of Gaetz’s ethics report is highly irregular. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) has suggested that if the former Florida lawmaker is to have his report released by the committee, it should “put it ALL out there for the American people to see.”
“Yes… all the ethics reports and claims including the one I filed,” she added, alluding to “sexual harassment and assault claims that were secretly settled paying off victims with tax payer money.”
Giving funds to someone you are dating – that they didn’t ask for – and that isn’t “charged” for sex is now prostitution?!?
There is a reason they did this to me in a Christmas Eve-Eve report and not in a courtroom of any kind where I could present evidence and challenge… pic.twitter.com/HzWODpBBB9
Former Congressman Matt Gaetz has filed a lawsuit against the House Ethics Committee to prevent the public release of their investigation into discredited sexual and drug misconduct allegations. However, some news outlets have already published details of the investigation.
show more
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is set to distribute approximately $2.4 billion to around one million taxpayerswho did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. Eligible individuals can expect to receive payments up to $1,400, which will either be directly deposited into bank accounts or sent as paper checks in the coming weeks.
This disbursement addresses those who missed out on one of the COVID-19 stimulus payments or received less than the intended amount but did not claim the rebate on their tax filing. According to IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel, a review of internal records revealed numerous eligible taxpayers had not claimed this credit despite qualifying for it.
To be eligible for these payments, individuals must have filed a 2021 tax return but neglected to complete or left the Recovery Rebate Credit field blank. Eligible taxpayers are not required to take additional action as the IRS will automatically distribute the payments. Deposits or checks should arrive by late January 2025, either to the bank account linked to the most recent tax return or the address on file.
For those who have yet to file their 2021 tax return, there remains an opportunity to qualify for the payment by submitting a return and claiming the Recovery Rebate Credit by the April 15, 2025, deadline.
During the pandemic, there were three phases of federal stimulus payments amounting to $814 billion. The federal government’s cumbersome technology made the distribution of the stimulus payments difficult, with thousands of Americans never receiving the payments they were due. It is unclear why the IRS is only now addressing the missing payments, nearly five years since the CARES Act was passed.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is set to distribute approximately $2.4 billion to around one million taxpayers who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. Eligible individuals can expect to receive payments up to $1,400, which will either be directly deposited into bank accounts or sent as paper checks in the coming weeks.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
