Wednesday, September 10, 2025
bbc

Presenter Tells Biden to ‘Hurry Up and Have Trump Murdered’ After SCOTUS Immunity Ruling.

David Aaronovitch, a BBC presenter and columnist for The Times of London, is calling on Joe Biden to “hurry up and have Trump murdered on the basis that he is a threat to America’s security” following the Supreme Court’s ruling that Presidents cannot be prosecuted for “official acts.”

“The President… may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts,” Chief Justice John Roberts explained in the ruling, which has major implications for the Biden regime’s lawfare prosecutions of Trump over January 6.

Aaronovitch, who hosts The Briefing Room news show on BBC Radio 4, is adopting the hysterical interpretation of the ruling by dissenting liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor. She claims it empowers Presidents to “[order] the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival” or “Organize a military coup to hold onto power.”

However, this is clearly inaccurate, as the ruling only immunizes the President against prosecution for “exercising his core constitutional powers.” These do not include powers to assassinate U.S. citizens at will or overthrow other branches of government in a military coup.

Moreover, the ruling clearly states that Congress can still remove the President’s immunity through the constitutional impeachment process. This is standard practice in the European Parliament and many European legislatures, where even low-level lawmakers often enjoy immunity unless there is a vote to remove it.

show less
David Aaronovitch, a BBC presenter and columnist for The Times of London, is calling on Joe Biden to "hurry up and have Trump murdered on the basis that he is a threat to America's security" following the Supreme Court's ruling that Presidents cannot be prosecuted for "official acts." show more

FACT CHECK: Did Farage Say Le Pen Will Be a ‘Disaster’ for France? No…

Brexit leader Nigel Farage was quoted on Monday as having called France’s Rassemblement National leader a “disaster” for France. The National Pulse checked the veracity of the comments first published by the neoliberal ‘UnHerd’ website, which has since altered its reporting.

On Monday, UnHerd claimed Farage said, “Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National (RN) will be a ‘disaster’ if elected in France.” Farage, however, pushed back against the framing of his comments, telling The National Pulse: “I am very unhappy with the UnHerd headline. Whilst I do not agree with the Le Pen economics, I have said for ten years that she will become the French president.”

“On matters of sovereignty, border controls, and defending national culture, she stands up for people who have been treated with contempt by the elites,” he continued, predicting National Rally “will do very well on Sunday.”

The original UnHerd headline.

At the time of publication, UnHerd had altered its headline and first paragraph to reflect the change, though the falsely framed story also had a knock-on effect, with the Telegraph and Express newspapers also claiming Farage had slammed Le Pen ahead of her second round of voting on Sunday.

The edited UnHerd copy.

National Rally won the first round of the French elections on June 30, with President Emmanuel Macron‘s Ensemble bloc falling to third place behind a far-left coalition. Macron and the far-left are mulling a joint “republican front” to block the populists in the second round, but the establishment right Les Republicains (Republicans) are, for the first time, declining to support an anti-populist alliance.

The Telegraph’s original headline, before edits occurred late Monday.

Farage hopes to make his own political breakthrough in the British snap election on July 4.

show less
Brexit leader Nigel Farage was quoted on Monday as having called France's Rassemblement National leader a "disaster" for France. The National Pulse checked the veracity of the comments first published by the neoliberal 'UnHerd' website, which has since altered its reporting. show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
The incident is reflective of the uphill media battle most populist leaders across the Western world face
The incident is reflective of the uphill media battle most populist leaders across the Western world face show more
for exclusive members-only insights

FLASHBACK: MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Calls ‘This Version of Biden, Intellectually, the Best Biden Ever.’

As recently as March, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough declared Joe Biden not just “cogent” but “better than he’s ever been, intellectually [and] analytically.” His Pravda-like praise of the Dear Leader, criticized at the time, appears even less credible after a disastrous debate performance.

“I’ve said it for years now, [Biden] is cogent—but I undersold it when I said he was cogent. He’s far beyond cogent,” Scarborough said in March.

“Start your tape right now because I’m about to tell you the truth, and eff you if you can’t handle the truth. This version of Biden, intellectually, analytically, is the best Biden ever, not a close second, and I’ve known him for years,” he insisted.

Scarborough made the remarks shortly after a Justice Department report by special counsel Robert Hur recommended against charging Biden for mishandling classified materials in part because he is “an elderly man with a poor memory.”

Post-debate, however, Scarborough is pushing for Biden to step aside, asking, “If he were CEO, and he turned in a performance like that, would any corporation in America keep him on as CEO?”

“I fear Donald Trump will be the next president of the United States unless things change,” the MSNBC host mourned.

Scarborough paints a second Trump administration in hysterical terms, claiming the America First leader will exile, imprison, or execute his opponents if he returns to the White House.

show less
As recently as March, MSNBC host Joe Scarborough declared Joe Biden not just "cogent" but "better than he’s ever been, intellectually [and] analytically." His Pravda-like praise of the Dear Leader, criticized at the time, appears even less credible after a disastrous debate performance. show more

AOC Says She’ll IMPEACH Supreme Court Justices Over Trump Immunity Ruling.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is threatening to impeach members of the Supreme Court after they ruled six to three that former President Donald J. Trump cannot be prosecuted for his official acts while in office. The far-left progressive congresswoman stated Monday in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that she intends to file articles of impeachment against the justices once Congress returns from the July 4 holiday.

“The Supreme Court has become consumed by a corruption crisis beyond its control,” Rep. Ocasio-Cortez wrote. She added: “Today’s ruling represents an assault on American democracy. It is up to Congress to defend our nation from this authoritarian capture. I intend on filing articles of impeachment upon our return.” It is unclear if Ocasio-Cortez intends to impeach the entire Supreme Court or just the six justices who ruled against Joe Biden‘s Department of Justice (DOJ) and its special counsel, Jack Smith, on the immunity claim.

Earlier on Monday, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for the high court’s majority, stating: “The President therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts.” According to the justices, the burden of proof that former President Trump did not act in an official capacity when challenging the 2020 presidential election results rests on the Biden DOJ and Jack Smith.

Associate Justice Samuel Chase became the only member of the Supreme Court to have ever been impeached by the House of Representatives in 1804. However, the Senate acquitted Chase of the charges just a year later.

show less
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is threatening to impeach members of the Supreme Court after they ruled six to three that former President Donald J. Trump cannot be prosecuted for his official acts while in office. The far-left progressive congresswoman stated Monday in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that she intends to file articles of impeachment against the justices once Congress returns from the July 4 holiday. show more

Is Boeing Getting Special Treatment?

Boeing is nearing an agreement with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to plead guilty to criminal charges stemming from two fatal 737 Max crashes that occurred in 2018 and 2019, according to attorneys representing the victims’ families.

The aerospace manufacturer is accused of violating a previous settlement related to these tragedies, which resulted in the deaths of 346 people. The crashes took place in Indonesia in October 2018 and Ethiopia in 2019.

In January 2021, the DOJ charged Boeing with conspiracy to defraud the United States, alleging that the company misled the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) during the evaluation of the 737 MAX aircraft.

Boeing agreed to a deferred prosecution agreement, committing to pay fines totaling $243.7 million, $1.77 billion in compensation to airline customers, and $500 million to the beneficiaries of the crash victims. Boeing also agreed to cooperate with the government and avoid committing any felony offenses, with the DOJ deferring criminal prosecution for three years.

In May, the DOJ asserted that Boeing had violated its obligations under the 2021 settlement. Now, the DOJ is proposing a new agreement, which would necessitate Boeing pleading guilty to conspiracy charges, paying a fine of approximately $200 million, agreeing to the appointment of an external corporate monitor, and remaining on probation for three years. This deal would prevent the need for a criminal trial.

The families of the crash victims have expressed dissatisfaction with the proposed plea deal, criticizing it for lacking accountability and an admission of conspiracy causing the deaths of 346 people.

Several whistleblowers have come forward warning of safety issues with Boeing aircraft, including John Barnett, who was found shot to death earlier this year. Barnett had warned, “If anything happens to me, it’s not suicide,” although his death was ruled as self-inflicted.

show less
Boeing is nearing an agreement with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to plead guilty to criminal charges stemming from two fatal 737 Max crashes that occurred in 2018 and 2019, according to attorneys representing the victims' families. show more

Biden Regime Bringing Back Migrants Deported by Trump.

The Joe Biden regime is actively reimporting illegal aliens deported to Cameroon by Donald Trump. Discovered through interviews with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel and an examination of internal documents, the move remains unannounced to the public.

Memos reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon reveal ICE collaborating with nonprofits to bring back the migrants. An internal email from 2023 shows Fatma Marouf, director of the Immigrant Rights Clinic at Texas A&M University, informing ICE of an arriving migrant at Washington-Dulles Airport.

Former ICE chief of staff Tom Blank suggests activist groups influencing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) decisions compromises the legal process. ICE’s collaboration with the Immigrant Rights Clinic is unusual. Such returns typically follow strict judicial orders after recognized prosecution errors.

Documents suggest the Biden regime aims to avoid litigation related to alleged abuses of Cameroonian migrants. A pending lawsuit in New York concerning related documents is noted—but no court has mandated their return.

The decision seems tied to a February 2022 Human Rights Watch report alleging mistreatment of Cameroonians deported between 2019 and 2021. Current and former ICE officials say reversing deportations for individuals previously deemed ineligible for asylum is unprecedented.

On his first day in office, Biden halted border wall construction. He also ended the policy of requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for court hearings. Most Americans believe he is “encouraging” illegal aliens to enter the U.S. to “create a permanent majority” for the Democrats.

Projections suggest that, by the end of his term, he will have overseen an illegal immigrant influx on par with all legal immigration from 1892 to 1954.

show less
The Joe Biden regime is actively reimporting illegal aliens deported to Cameroon by Donald Trump. Discovered through interviews with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel and an examination of internal documents, the move remains unannounced to the public. show more

Sotomayor Melts Down in Immunity Dissent, Says SCOTUS Has Authorized POTUS to Assassinate Rivals.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued an apoplectic dissent against the Supreme Court‘s majority opinion, holding former President Donald J. Trump cannot be prosecuted for official acts he ordered while in office. The far-left justice baselessly claimed that Monday’s ruling would allow the sitting president to assassinate political opponents or even overthrow the federal government.

“When he uses his official powers in any way, under the majority’s reasoning, he will now be insulated from criminal prosecution,” Justice Sotomayor claimed, alleging the ruling dangerously expands presidential power. She continued, hyperbolically stating: “Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organize a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Take a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.”

According to the far-left justice, the high court’s decision “creates a law-free zone around the President.” She goes further, insisting the ruling now allows the President to legally “…place his own interests, his own political survival, or his own financial gain, above the interests of the Nation.”

Despite Sotomayor’s over-the-top dissent, the Supreme Court‘s ruling does not radically alter executive power, nor does it mean the President can murder his political opposition. The majority opinion provides legal immunity for a President’s official acts but not those proven to be ordered in an unofficial capacity. Additionally, the ruling contends that Congress can remove said immunity through the impeachment and removal of a President.

Moreover, the majority of the court asserted that their ruling only intended to set out guidelines for the appeals court to follow, with the case remanded back to the D.C. Circuit for additional proceedings. They noted that the burden of proof is on prosecutors, not the President, to demonstrate that an act is made in an unofficial capacity.

READ: 

Image

show less
Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued an apoplectic dissent against the Supreme Court's majority opinion, holding former President Donald J. Trump cannot be prosecuted for official acts he ordered while in office. The far-left justice baselessly claimed that Monday's ruling would allow the sitting president to assassinate political opponents or even overthrow the federal government. show more
jack smith

Justice Thomas Says Jack Smith’s Appointment as Special Counsel May Be Unconstitutional.

In Monday’s landmark Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, Justice Clarence Thomas raised the secondary issue regarding the constitutionality of Jack Smith‘s appointment as a special prosecutor for Joe Biden’s Department of Justice (DOJ). Smith is currently overseeing two separate prosecutions targeting former President Donald J. Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee and currently favored to defeat Biden in November’s election.

“In this case, the Attorney General purported to appoint a private citizen as Special Counsel to prosecute a former President on behalf of the United States,” Justice Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion. He continued: “But, I am not sure that any office for the Special Counsel has been ‘established by Law,’ as the Constitution requires.”

At the heart of Justice Thomas‘s argument is that Article II of the U.S. Constitution specifically grants the power to create inferior offices in the executive branch not to the President but to Congress. He contends that without legislative authorization, Attorney General Merrick Garland‘s appointment of a Special Counsel is unconstitutional.

“By requiring that Congress create federal offices ‘by Law,’ the Constitution imposes an important check against the President—he cannot create offices at his pleasure,” the justice wrote, adding: ” If there is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies, then he cannot proceed with this prosecution. A private citizen cannot criminally prosecute anyone, let alone a former President.”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh has raised a similar contention as Thomas in the past while also noting that the appointment of a private citizen to the Office of Special Counsel without Senate confirmation likely violates Article II of the U.S. Constitution’s Appointments Clause. Jack Smith did not hold a Senate-confirmed position prior to his appointment by Garland.

show less
In Monday's landmark Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, Justice Clarence Thomas raised the secondary issue regarding the constitutionality of Jack Smith's appointment as a special prosecutor for Joe Biden's Department of Justice (DOJ). Smith is currently overseeing two separate prosecutions targeting former President Donald J. Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee and currently favored to defeat Biden in November's election. show more
bannon image by Gage Skidmore

Bannon Imprisoned: ‘I’m Far from Dead, Baby!’

War Room host Stephen K. Bannon has reported to federal prison to begin his four-month sentence for defying the corrupt January 6 Committee. In a final War Room broadcast, the former chief strategist to Donald Trump said Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Attorney General Merrick Garland have made him a martyr—”but martyrs die, and I’m far from dead, baby!”

“What the ruling class in this country has to understand is there’s nobody they can imprison, there’s nobody they can assassinate, there’s nobody they can bankrupt, there’s nobody they can deplatform, to stop the MAGA movement,” Bannon warned.

Globally, he cited Nationally Rally’s victory in the first round of the French legislative elections, the rise of populism in Germany, and Nigel Farage’s Trump-style rallies in England as proof the populist-nationalist movement is in the ascendant.

“The message of President Trump is very simple: fight on! If we don’t stop, if President Trump continues to fight, victory is going to be ours; we’re going to win in a landslide,” he declared.

Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, argued that “Biden’s DOJ and their cronies” moved to incarcerate Bannon for most of the remaining election period because Bannon “actually gets people up off their couches, up off their seats; helps them to register for precinct strategy; helps them to register for canvassing and campaigning.”

Bannon says he is “proud of going to prison.”

“If this is what it takes to stand up to tyranny; if this is what it takes to stand up to the Garland, corrupt criminal DOJ; if this is what it takes to stand up to Nancy Pelosi; if this is what it takes to stand up to Joe Biden, I’m proud to do it,” he said.

show less
War Room host Stephen K. Bannon has reported to federal prison to begin his four-month sentence for defying the corrupt January 6 Committee. In a final War Room broadcast, the former chief strategist to Donald Trump said Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Attorney General Merrick Garland have made him a martyr—"but martyrs die, and I'm far from dead, baby!" show more

BREAKING – Supreme Court Says Trump CANNOT Be Prosecuted For Official Acts.

The United States Supreme Court ruled Monday that former President Donald J. Trump cannot be prosecuted for official acts he ordered while in office. “The President therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is  entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority in a six to three decision.

According to the majority opinion, the Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit’s prior ruling that Trump is not protected by presidential immunity is vacated. Chief Justice Roberts ordered the case remanded back to the lower court for additional proceedings instructed by the ruling.

“In dividing official from unofficial conduct, courts may not inquire into the President’s motives,” Roberts wrote. He continued: “Such an inquiry would risk exposing even the most obvious instances of official conduct to judicial examination on the mere allegation of improper purpose, thereby intruding on the Article II interests that immunity seeks to protect.”

The Chief Justice added further instruction for the appeals court: “Nor may courts deem an action unofficial merely because it allegedly violates a generally applicable law.”

The ruling now places the burden on Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Jack Smith to prove that former President Trump‘s challenge to the 2020 presidential election results was outside his official capacity as the nation’s chief executive. Further, the Supreme Court ruled that Trump’s alleged personal motivations do not determine whether he acted in an official capacity or not.

show less
The United States Supreme Court ruled Monday that former President Donald J. Trump cannot be prosecuted for official acts he ordered while in office. "The President therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is  entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority in a six to three decision. show more