GET THE APP
Monday, October 20, 2025

Category: News
September 5, 2025
News

Anna Paulina Luna Exposes Epstein’s Alleged Intelligence Links.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) highlighted a potential connection between intelligence agencies and deceased child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Anna Paulina Luna, Jeffrey Epstein, his victims, intelligence agencies, and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Thursday, on social media platform X (formerly Twitter).

💬KEY QUOTE: “In my opinion, there is definitely an intelligence connection.” – Anna Paulina Luna

🎯IMPACT: Luna’s comments will renew scrutiny of Epstein’s alleged ties to intelligence agencies and demands for transparency in the investigation into his activities and death.

IN FULL

U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), who leads the House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, has suggested a link between deceased child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and intelligence agencies. Her comments followed a private Capitol Hill meeting with Epstein’s victims.

On Thursday, Luna posted on X, “In my opinion, there is definitely an intelligence connection. Countries named by the lead attorney for the witnesses [Epstein’s victims] included Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Israel, as well as a former CIA director,” with the last of these “inferred to be the CIA director under the Bush administration, based on the attorney’s description of interactions while Epstein was in his work/arrest program.” Michael Hayden was the CIA Director when Epstein’s plea deal was finalized in June 2008 and during the early part of his sentence.

Luna stressed that the Task Force’s ultimate goal is criminal referrals, revealing that “thousands” of Department of Justice (DOJ) e-mails are currently under review. She also highlighted the ongoing impact of the Epstein scandal on victims, saying it is “important to understand how frightening this is for some of the women involved. In some cases, they were threatened.” Finally, she emphasized that “both the victims and others have stated to the press that President Trump was not involved.”

Epstein, known for his connections to powerful and wealthy figures such as the Clintons, has long faced accusations of ties to domestic and foreign intelligence agencies.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
September 5, 2025
News
UK

Another Rape Gang Conviction in English Grooming Hotspot.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A man has been found guilty of grooming and raping two young girls in Rotherham, England during the early 2000s.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Obaidullah Omari, 46, and two victims aged between 13 and 14 at the time of the abuse.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The abuse occurred in Rotherham between 2003 and 2004. Omari was convicted at Sheffield Crown Court.

💬KEY QUOTE: “What they have been through is unimaginable, yet they were still able to tell us their stories and give evidence.” – Alan Hastings, National Crime Agency (NCA)

🎯IMPACT: To date, 48 predators have been convicted through Operation Stovewood, which continues to investigate grooming gang abuse in Rotherham.

IN FULL

Obaidullah Omari, 46, has been found guilty of grooming and raping two young girls in Rotherham, England, during the early 2000s. The offences, which took place between 2003 and 2004, involved victims aged 13 and 14. A jury at Sheffield Crown Court convicted Omari of three counts of rape and two counts of indecent assault following a two-week trial. He was sentenced to 19 years on Thursday.

The case is part of Operation Stovewood, a major investigation led by the National Crime Agency (NCA) into child sexual exploitation by mostly Muslim, Pakistani-background groomers targeting mostly white, working-class girls in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. With Omari’s conviction, 48 predators have now been found guilty under the operation, making it the largest investigation of its kind.

Alan Hastings, a senior investigating officer with the NCA, praised the victims for their strength in coming forward: “What they have been through is unimaginable, yet they were still able to tell us their stories and give evidence.” He emphasized that the investigation remains active and continues to support survivors.

In Parliament, Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips confirmed that 1,273 closed grooming cases have been reopened for review, with 216 being prioritized “as a matter of urgency.” She also claimed there has been progress on organizing a national inquiry into rape gangs, stating: “The chair must have credibility and experience to command the confidence of victims and survivors as well as the wider public.” A dedicated panel of survivors will supposedly assist in the selection process.

Public trust in how the media and authorities have handled the grooming gang scandals remains low. A January 2025 poll revealed that a plurality of 43 percent of Britons believe the media downplayed the issue due to “political correctness,” compared to only 18 percent who disagreed. Journalist Andrew Norfolk, who helped expose the scandal, admitted, “I didn’t want the story to be true because it made me deeply uncomfortable.”

In July 2025, several women came forward claiming South Yorkshire Police officers abused them during the original Rotherham crisis. One survivor says she was raped in a marked police car and threatened with being returned to her abusers. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is now overseeing an investigation into these claims.

Reform Party leader Nigel Farage recently warned that the grooming scandal is only “getting worse,” highlighting a case involving a father arrested while trying to rescue his trafficked daughter. He accused police of systemic failure and called for the Rotherham case to be included in the national inquiry.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
September 4, 2025
News

Activists Rally in Support of Transgenderism at Catholic School Targeted by Shooter.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Pro-transgenderism activists gathered outside Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis to demonstrate against a visit by Vice President J.D. Vance after a shooting that left two children dead and 17 others injured. The shooter, a transgender, targeted the church during a back-to-school Mass.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The shooter, identified as 23-year-old Robin Westman, formerly Robert, along with victims, church attendees, and Vice President Vance, who visited the site to meet with families.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The shooting occurred at Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis during a back-to-school Mass. Demonstrations followed in the days after the tragedy.

🎯IMPACT: The incident has reignited debates on gun violence, mental health, and the role of transgender ideology in mass shootings.

IN FULL

Pro-transgenderism protestors gathered outside the Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, demonstrating against a visit by Vice President J.D. Vance following a mass shooting that claimed the lives of two children and left 17 others injured. The shooter, identified as 23-year-old Robin Westman, formerly Robert, fired through the church’s stained-glass windows during a back-to-school Mass.

Westman, who was a transgender, had a documented history of mental health struggles and fascination with mass killings. He died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound at the scene.

Pro-trans activists gathered outside the church on Wednesday as Vance and his wife, Usha, arrived to meet with victims’ families. The group’s actions, which included displaying a transgender flag near the site of the attack, were widely criticized as provocative and insensitive.

On Thursday, The National Pulse reported that the Trump administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) is considering imposing restrictions that would prevent those undergoing gender transition or diagnosed with gender dysphoria from purchasing firearms. Additionally, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is investigating the attack as an act of domestic terrorism and a hate crime targeting Catholics.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey (D) has called for avoiding the “villainization” of the transgender community.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
September 4, 2025
Lawfare

Biden Judge Orders Trump to Disburse Withheld Foreign Aid.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release $11.5 billion in foreign aid, ruling the administration’s decision to withhold the funds was likely illegal.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Court Judge Amir Ali, the Trump administration, and Congress.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued late Wednesday in Washington, D.C., with funds set to expire at the end of the month.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Defendants do not have any discretion as to whether to spend the funds.” – Judge Amir Ali

🎯IMPACT: The ruling could set a precedent on executive authority over congressionally approved funds, with the administration filing an appeal.

IN FULL

U.S. District Court Judge Amir Ali ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration’s withholding of $11.5 billion in congressionally approved foreign aid was likely illegal, issuing a preliminary injunction to release the funds before they expire at the end of the month.

“To be clear, no one disputes that Defendants have significant discretion in how to spend the funds at issue, and the Court is not directing Defendants to make payments to any particular recipients,” Judge Ali wrote. “But Defendants do not have any discretion as to whether to spend the funds.” Ali, a Biden appointee, insisted that Congress—not the executive branch—has the authority to rescind appropriated funds.

The ruling challenges the administration’s use of a “pocket rescission,” a tactic where a president submits a late request to Congress to not spend approved funds, effectively bypassing the legislative branch. President Donald J. Trump had previously informed House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) that he would not spend $4.9 billion of the aid, citing it as wasteful and misaligned with his foreign policy goals.

The administration filed an appeal following the ruling, and Ali acknowledged that his decision is unlikely to be the final word on the matter. “This case raises questions of immense legal and practical importance, including whether there is any avenue to test the executive branch’s decision not to spend congressionally appropriated funds,” Ali wrote.

The case also marks the first use of pocket rescission in nearly 50 years, a move that could set a significant precedent on the limits of executive authority. Ali stated that Congress would need to approve any rescission proposal for the funds to remain unspent, as outlined by existing law.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
September 4, 2025
Economy
Lawfare

Trump Takes Tariff Fight to the Supreme Court.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to swiftly review a lower court ruling that invalidated the President’s tariffs.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, the Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals, and attorney Jeffrey Schwab, representing the plaintiffs.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The appeals court ruling was issued last week, with the Supreme Court asked to hear the case as soon as November.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Few cases have so clearly called out for this Court’s swift resolution.” – Trump administration filing.

🎯IMPACT: If the ruling stands, President Trump’s tariffs would be rescinded, significantly affecting his trade policies and negotiations.

IN FULL

The Trump administration is petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to quickly review a lower court decision that found the President’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to enact certain tariffs was unconstitutional. According to the filing, the Trump White House is requesting that the high court hear arguments as soon as November. Notably, the lower court ruling is currently stayed from taking effect until October 14, 2025.

In the filing, the administration argues the U.S. Court of Appeals ruling “gravely undermines the President’s ability to conduct real-world diplomacy and his ability to protect the national security and economy of the United States.” The filing further states, “That decision casts a pall of uncertainty upon ongoing foreign negotiations that the President has been pursuing through tariffs over the past five months, jeopardizing both already-negotiated framework deals and ongoing negotiations.”

On August 29, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that President Trump exceeded his authority under the IEEPA to impose tariffs. The court stated, “Absent a valid delegation by Congress, the President has no authority to impose taxes. Given these considerations, we conclude Congress, in enacting IEEPA, did not give the President wide-ranging authority to impose tariffs of the nature of the Trafficking and Reciprocal Tariffs simply by the use of the term ‘regulate … importation.’”

Under the IEEPA—enacted in 1977—the President is empowered to impose tariffs after declaring a national emergency. Earlier this year, President Trump declared a national emergency over foreign trade practices, stating that reciprocal tariffs were necessary to protect American workers and strengthen the U.S. economy. Subsequently, the Trump White House has reached bilateral trade agreements with a number of U.S. trade partners, while the tariffs have brought in record revenue for the federal government.

Jeffrey Schwab, representing the plaintiffs, expressed confidence in the legal arguments against the tariffs, saying, “Both federal courts that considered the issue agreed that IEEPA does not give the President unchecked tariff authority.” Meanwhile, President Trump criticized the “Highly Partisan Appeals Court” and warned, “If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
September 4, 2025
Education
Lawfare

Harvard Wins Legal Battle Against Trump Administration… For Now.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Barack Obama-appointed federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reverse over $2.6 billion in funding cuts to Harvard University, citing retaliation for the university’s rejection of governance and policy demands.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, the Trump administration, and Harvard University.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Wednesday; the events involve federal funding cuts tied to Harvard’s campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

💬KEY QUOTE: “In fact, a review of the administrative record makes it difficult to conclude anything other than that [the government] used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country’s premier universities.” – Judge Burroughs

🎯IMPACT: The ruling restores funding to Harvard and bars further retaliatory actions.

IN FULL

U.S. District Court Judge Allison Burroughs, appointed to the bench by former President Barack Obama, has ordered that the Trump administration must reverse over $2.6 billion in funding cuts to Harvard University. According to Judge Burroughs, the funding freeze was an act of retaliation against Harvard for rejecting changes the administration sought in the university’s governance and policies.

Notably, Burroughs has made rulings on a number of cases involving the Trump White House and Harvard, including the issuance of a temporary restraining order in May blocking the administration from revoking Harvard University’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification, which would have barred them from enrolling foreign students. The judge’s latest determination follows a lawsuit filed by Harvard, which argued that the cuts violated its free speech rights under the First Amendment. Burroughs stated that the administration’s justification for the cuts, citing Harvard’s handling of anti-Semitism, was a “smokescreen” for an ideologically motivated attack.

The District Court Judge acknowledged that Harvard had been “plagued by antisemitism in recent years” and criticized the university for its slow response to the issue. However, she also insisted that Harvard has taken steps to address the problem and appears willing to continue improving its efforts.

Burroughs’s decision ensures that Harvard’s federal grants cannot be terminated for the time being, pending a possible appeal by the Trump administration. The ruling also bars President Donald J. Trump from withholding future funding in retaliation.

Image by Adam Fagen.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
September 4, 2025
Crime
NatSec

FBI Confiscated Phones, Computers in Raid on Bolton’s Residence.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Documents reveal the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) seized phones, computer equipment, and documents from John Bolton’s home during an investigation into potential mishandling of classified information.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: John Bolton, the neoconservative former White House national security adviser, and the FBI.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The search occurred last month at Bolton’s home in Bethesda, Maryland, and his office in Washington, D.C.

🎯IMPACT: The investigation highlights concerns over the mishandling of classified information by former officials with a grudge against President Trump, and has drawn public interest due to Bolton’s high-profile role during the first Trump administration.

IN FULL

Court records unsealed Thursday reveal that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) seized phones, computer equipment, and various documents from the home of John Bolton, a former White House national security adviser in the first Trump administration. The investigation, which surfaced publicly last month when federal law enforcement raided Bolton’s home and office, revolves around allegations of mishandling classified information.

The search took place at Bolton’s Bethesda, Maryland, residence and his office in Washington, D.C. Documents made public include a search warrant inventory detailing the confiscation of multiple phones, computer equipment, four boxes of daily printed activities, a white box labeled “statements and reflections to allied strikes,” and typed documents labeled “Trump I-IV.”

The court filings cite two criminal statutes related to the unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials, as well as the transmission or loss of defense information. Despite the investigation, no charges had been filed against Bolton as of the time of publication.

A coalition of news organizations successfully lobbied a judge to unseal the records, arguing that the public interest in the case outweighed the need for continued secrecy. However, the documents do remain partially redacted.

Bolton, who served as national security adviser in President Donald J. Trump‘s first administration for 17 months before being dismissed in 2019, has not commented publicly on the investigation. Known for his criticism of Trump’s foreign policy, the longtime war hawk detailed his disagreements with the America First leader in a book titled The Room Where It Happened.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
September 4, 2025
Crime

Governor Welcomes Trump’s Plan for Troops in Crime-Ridden Dem City.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Governor Jeff Landry (R) welcomed President Donald J. Trump’s suggestion of deploying the National Guard to Democrat-run New Orleans, Louisiana, to crush crime.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Governor Landry, the City of New Orleans, and the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump’s comments were made on Wednesday during a White House press conference, with responses from Landry and others following.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We will take President Donald Trump’s help from New Orleans to Shreveport!” – Governor Jeff Landry.

🎯IMPACT: A federal crackdown in New Orleans, similar to the one in Washington, D.C., could substantially reduce crime.

IN FULL

Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry (R) is expressing support for President Donald J. Trump’s proposal to send the National Guard to Democrat-run New Orleans to crush crime. “We will take President Donald Trump’s help from New Orleans to Shreveport!” Landry said in response to Trump’s comments during a White House press conference on Wednesday.

Trump mentioned New Orleans as one of the cities under consideration for federal assistance, saying, “We’re making a determination now. Do we go to Chicago or do we go to a place like New Orleans, where we have a great governor, Jeff Landry, who wants us to straighten out a very nice section of this country?”

New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell, a Democrat who was indicted by a federal grand jury on corruption charges last month, shared a muted statement from the city, which did not explicitly endorse or reject Trump’s suggestion but acknowledged that federal and state partnerships are important for ensuring public safety, particularly during major events.

While federal law enforcement assistance appears to face little resistance in New Orleans, the same cannot be said for other Democrat-controlled localities. Democrats in Chicago, Illinois, and Los Angeles, California, have vowed to oppose federal interventions in their cities. Meanwhile, the Portland Police Department in Oregon appears to have entirely abdicated its law enforcement duties in about a four-block radius around a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facility, failing to dispatch officers even in instances of assault by anti-ICE rioters in the area.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
September 4, 2025
William Upton
Crime
NatSec

Trump DOJ Considering Gun Restrictions for Transgenders: Report.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) is considering imposing restrictions that would prevent those undergoing gender transition or diagnosed with gender dysphoria from purchasing firearms.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The DOJ, gun owners, and transgenders.

📍WHEN & WHERE:  DOJ discussions were revealed on Thursday, September 4, 2025, after a mass shooting at a Catholic mass in Minnesota, carried out by a transgender gunman.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Individuals within the DOJ are reviewing ways to ensure that mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria are unable to obtain firearms while they are unstable and unwell.” — DOJ Official

🎯IMPACT: The DOJ could move to extend restrictions on gun ownership for the mentally ill to include those who identify as transgender or who are diagnosed with gender dysphoria.

IN FULL

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is considering imposing restrictions that would prevent those undergoing gender transition or diagnosed with gender dysphoria from purchasing firearms. Notably, the potential legal restrictions come in the wake of anti-Trump transgender Robin Westman’s deadly attack on a back-to-school Mass at Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, last week.

Reportedly, the DOJ is discussing internally whether to extend restrictions that bar certain mentally ill people from owning firearms to those with gender dysphoria, which is itself classified as a mental disorder. A DOJ source, speaking with the media, explained: “Individuals within the DOJ are reviewing ways to ensure that mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria are unable to obtain firearms while they are unstable and unwell.”

Officially, the DOJ is not commenting on the deliberations, with a spokesman only saying that the agency is considering a “range of options.” However, the deadly church shooting in Minnesota last week has sparked a public debate about new restrictions, especially in light of the fact that a number of recent mass shootings were perpetrated by individuals with gender dysphoria or who identified as transgender.

Meanwhile, the Trump White House is believed to be updating its national security strategy to include guidance regarding transgender violence. In January this year, A U.S. Border Patrol officer in Vermont was murdered by two people with ties to a militant transgender extremist group called the “Zizians.” In February, the leader of the “Zizians”— Jack LaSota, a 34-year-old man who identifies as a transgender woman under the alias Andrea Phelps—was arrested in Maryland’s western backcountry.

LaSota had been on the run since he skipped a December trial. Previously, he faked his death to duck prosecution and was even declared deceased in San Mateo County, California.

President Donald J. Trump’s Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was also the target of an assassination plot in January, with the suspect revealed to identify as transgender. Ryan Michael English, also known as Riley Jane, admitted to police that he wanted to kill Treasury Secretary Bessent.

The National Pulse reported last Thursday that Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had announced an investigation into whether psychiatric medication is contributing to the rise in mass shootings, especially those perpetrated by transgender individuals. “I certainly consider mass shootings a health crisis, and we are doing for the first time real studies to find out what the ideology of that is. And we’re looking for the first time at psychiatric drugs,” Kennedy stated.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
September 4, 2025
News

Conway and Comstock Are Funding Far-Left Campaign Targeting ICE Agents.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Corporate filings have uncovered a campaign by George Conway and Barbara Comstock funding anti-ICE posters urging agents to reveal their identities.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: George Conway, Barbara Comstock, Home of the Brave USA, Inc., U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, and The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Recent weeks, at locations including bus stops in Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It was just a couple of years ago, wasn’t it, that it was actually the political left screaming about putting masks on, and now there are signs saying take your masks off.” – Raheem Kassam

🎯IMPACT: The poster campaign increased safety concerns for ICE personnel, with potential for further violence against agents.

IN FULL

Corporate filings have revealed that George Conway and Barbara Comstock are key figures funding a far-left flyer campaign urging Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to “take off your masks” and face public scrutiny, despite the fact that this would open them to attacks.

The posters, funded by Home of the Brave USA, Inc., have appeared at bus stops and on buildings in Washington, D.C., with Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, noting in a recent video report, “It’s funny, it was just a couple of years ago, wasn’t it, that it was actually the political left screaming about putting masks on, and now there are signs saying take your masks off,” Kassam remarked, noting that ICE “have to remain masked a lot of the time for fear of reprisals simply for doing their jobs.”

Conway is a vocal critic of President Donald J. Trump and co-founded the Lincoln Project, alongside other Republicans-in-name-only (RINOs), such as predator John Weaver. Notably, Conway persuaded writer E. Jean Carroll to pursue President Trump over an alleged sexual assault decades ago, one of many attacks she claims to have been subjected to by at least eight men.

Comstock is a former Republican congresswoman and current Baker Donelson lobbyist, known for establishing the American Consumer & Investor Institute in 2023. The aforementioned filing highlights their involvement in the organization behind the anti-ICE poster campaign.

The effort to unmask ICE agents raises safety concerns, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) noting doxxing incidents in Portland, Oregon, where anarchist groups exposed ICE officers’ personal information. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has pledged to prosecute those involved, citing risks from gangs like MS-13 using such data to intimidate or even kill personnel involved in immigration enforcement efforts, as well as their families.

Notably, ICE and other federal law enforcement are already being targeted in increasingly violent attacks, with a sniper attack outside one ICE facility seeing a responding local police officer shot in the neck.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more