Monday, November 17, 2025

Apparently the Word Homosexual’ is ‘Derogatory and Offensive’ Now.

In a revised Media Reference Guide, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) claims the term “homosexual” is “derogatory and offensive.”

The LGBTQ advocacy group described ‘homosexual’ as an “outdated clinical term,” claiming that its historical usage insinuates homosexuality is a disease or psychological disorder.

They further assert terms including “homosexual relations/relationship,” “homosexual couple,” and “homosexual sex” are leveraged by antagonists as tools to degrade LGBTQ people, their relationships, and their lifestyle.

In addition to ‘canceling’ the word “homosexual,” the group’s new guidelines also insinuate that terms like “gay” and “lesbian” are racist as they are “Eurocentric.” Instead, the new guidelines promote the term “same-gender loving.”

“Also known as SGL, this is a term used by some African American people as an Afrocentric alternative to what are considered Eurocentric, or white, identities like gay and lesbian. Coined by activist Cleo Manago in the 1990s, the term and its usage explicitly recognizes [sic] the histories and cultures of people of African descent,” the guidelines state.

The new guidelines received widespread criticism online, including from other homosexual groups. The homosexual group Gays Against Groomers (GAG) slammed the guidelines, stating: “An organization whose name literally stands for ‘Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation’ has now come out and declared the word homosexual to be outdated, derogatory, and offensive. They have replaced the term with ‘Same-Gender Loving,’ completely erasing biological sex, gay people and the decades of progress we fought to achieve in this country.”

show less
In a revised Media Reference Guide, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) claims the term “homosexual" is “derogatory and offensive.” show more

SCOTUS Reverses, Now WILL Allow Texas to Protect Border.

Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett ruled Tuesday to lift the administrative stay upheld on Monday by Justice Samuel Alito, which blocked Texas from enforcing SB4, a newly introduced immigration law. The law enables local law enforcement to detain migrants and empowers state judges to order deportations.

The two justices issued an order vacating the prior order by Justice Alito, noting that the legislative pause enacted on behalf of the Biden Department of Justice by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals was not a ‘stay pending appeal.’ Instead, the two justices concluded the stay was administrative in nature as the circuit court had cited its docket management authority.

President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice contends that the power to make and enforce immigration law is solely reserved in the Constitution to the federal government. Texas has countered that constitutional provisions afford state governments latitude on immigration law when the federal government is unable or refuses to enforce security at the border.

While a temporary freeze halted the law’s execution in early March, following a preemptive lawsuit from the Biden government, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it would go into effect on March 10 if the Supreme Court declined to intervene. Justice Alito ordered a second emergency stay request on Monday. Tuesday’s order from justices Kavanaugh and Barrett has vacated Alito’s order.

While the justices have lifted the stay, they have yet to rule on the actual merits of the case.

show less
Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett ruled Tuesday to lift the administrative stay upheld on Monday by Justice Samuel Alito, which blocked Texas from enforcing SB4, a newly introduced immigration law. The law enables local law enforcement to detain migrants and empowers state judges to order deportations. show more

Iraqi Migrant Plotted to Smuggle Assassins over Mexico Border to Kill Prior President.

Shihab Ahmed Shihab Shihab, an Iraqi migrant residing in Ohio, plotted to smuggle Islamic State sympathizers into the U.S. with an ambition to assassinate former president George W. Bush. He was sentenced to 14 years in prison following a guilty plea.

Court documents reveal Shihab deemed Bush guilty of mass murder in Iraq. The migrant plotted to smuggle two former Iraqi intelligence agents across the U.S.-Mexican border to carry out the former president’s assassination, not realizing he was dealing with a confidential Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) informant.

Shihab faces additional charges for involvement with al-Qaeda as a weapon supplier from Syria to Iraq during the war.

Bush has previously partnered with the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, founded by Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg, to push mass migration and amnesty for illegal aliens.

Officials working for the Joe Biden regime have admitted to a ninefold increase in terrorists attempting to cross the southern border over the course of 2023.

There appears to be some reluctance in terms of acknowledging the issue, however, with the U.S. Border Patrol having been known to delete press releases announcing terrorist apprehensions at the frontier.

show less
Shihab Ahmed Shihab Shihab, an Iraqi migrant residing in Ohio, plotted to smuggle Islamic State sympathizers into the U.S. with an ambition to assassinate former president George W. Bush. He was sentenced to 14 years in prison following a guilty plea. show more

Major London Train Station Displays ‘Hadiths of the Day’ Throughout Ramadan.

King’s Cross, one of the busiest and most important railway stations in Sadiq Khan’s London, has been displaying ‘Hadiths of the Day’ on its main display throughout the Islamic month of Ramadan.

A picture of a screen on the station’s main concourse, displaying a quote with the text “All the sons of Adam are sinners but the best of the sinners are those who repent often,” has gone viral on X (formerly Twitter).

It is the ninth in a series of similar quotes, however. A ‘Hadith of the Day’ reading, “When Ramadan enters, the gates of Paradise are Opened,” was celebrated by the Islam Channel, among others. This message also urged Muslims who “need support” with their fasting to speak to station staff.

Many X users expressed misgivings about the messages and voiced extreme skepticism that similar Christian messages would be displayed during holidays such as Lent, Easter, and Christmas.

In the most recent national census taken in 2021, the share of London’s population recorded as ‘White British’ had fallen to just 36.8 percent.

Mayor Khan’s office has previously issued guidance suggesting official materials should not feature images of white families, stating they do not represent “real Londoners.”

show less
King’s Cross, one of the busiest and most important railway stations in Sadiq Khan’s London, has been displaying ‘Hadiths of the Day’ on its main display throughout the Islamic month of Ramadan. show more

Judge Rules Illegals Can Carry Guns.

A federal judge recently ruled that an illegal alien was wrongly forbidden from carrying firearms per 18 U.S.C. § 922. Heriberto Carbajal-Flores, an illegal alien, was criminally charged in 2020 after he was found with a semi-automatic pistol in Chicago. Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman dismissed the case after she ruled that 18 U.S.C. § 922 violates the Second Amendment.

“The noncitizen possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5), violates the Second Amendment as applied to Carbajal-Flores,” Judge Coleman wrote. “Thus, the court grants Carbajal-Flores’ motion to dismiss.”

Coleman concurred with the defense’s argument that the government failed to show that the law in question matches the “historical tradition that delimits the outer bounds of the right to keep and bear arms.” In 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment presumptively protects conduct included in the amendment’s text. Per this ruling, any regulation must be “consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

Despite the government’s contention that the rule unilaterally does not apply to illegal immigrants, Judge Coleman sided with Carbajal-Flores.

“The government argues that Carbajal-Flores is a noncitizen who is unlawfully present in this country. The court notes, however, that Carbajal-Flores has never been convicted of a felony, a violent crime, or a crime involving the use of a weapon. Even in the present case, Carbajal-Flores contends that he received and used the handgun solely for self-protection and protection of property during a time of documented civil unrest in the Spring of 2020,”  Judge Coleman wrote.

show less
A federal judge recently ruled that an illegal alien was wrongly forbidden from carrying firearms per 18 U.S.C. § 922. Heriberto Carbajal-Flores, an illegal alien, was criminally charged in 2020 after he was found with a semi-automatic pistol in Chicago. Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman dismissed the case after she ruled that 18 U.S.C. § 922 violates the Second Amendment. show more

WATCH: NYT Produces Shocking North Korea-Style Propaganda Vid – ‘Deep State Is Awesome.’

The New York Times once claimed the Deep State “doesn’t exist.” Now, it admits it is real and says it “makes our lives better.”

In a brazen, North Korea-style propaganda video entitled ‘It Turns Out the “Deep State” Is Actually Kind of Awesome,’ the Times spoke to several bureaucrats, talking up their role as “everyday superheroes who wake up ready to dedicate their careers and their lives to serving us.”

“As we met the Americans who are being dismissed as public enemies, we discovered that they are … us,” waxed the newspaper of record.

“They like Taylor Swift. They dance bachata. They go to bed at night watching ‘Star Trek’ reruns. They go to work and do their jobs: saving us from Armageddon,” it continued, working hard to humanize its subjects.

However, the people interviewed by the NYT were not the bureaucrats generally associated with the Deep State. They appeared to be regular public servants tasked with apolitical work such as monitoring asteroids, removing lead piping, and investigating companies employing illegal alien children in dangerous occupations.

Nevertheless, these run-of-the-mill officials were used to attack Donald Trump’s proposed Schedule F reforms. These would make replacing entrenched bureaucrats advancing leftist ideology and interventionist foreign policy easier.

Agenda-driven actors within the Deep State disrupted several of the previous Trump administration’s policies, such as withdrawing troops from Syria.

show less
The New York Times once claimed the Deep State “doesn’t exist.” Now, it admits it is real and says it “makes our lives better.” show more

Ketanji Say: Censorship OK! 👌

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson suggested Monday that the government has a right to censor American citizens for their own good. In the Murthy v. Missouri case, the Supreme Court probed allegations that the Biden government had violated the First Amendment by colluding with social media platforms to suppress Americans’ freedom of speech. Justice Jackson expressed concern for scenarios wherein she believes the government has the right to limit speech.

“My biggest concern is that your view is that you have the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods,” she stated.

This assertion aligns with the Biden government’s stance that they can suppress online speech that contradicts their chosen narrative. The government’s attorney, Brian Fletcher, maintained that it has the legal flexibility to persuade private entities like social media companies to act in ways they perceive as lawful. Fletcher further equated the role of the government to that of a “bully pulpit” with the power to elevate or suppress ideas.

The legal representative for Missouri, Benjamin Aguiñaga, countered that the government intended to constrain speech, indirectly doing what it was constitutionally forbidden from doing directly. He highlighted the secretive nature of the government’s dealings with social media platforms, suggesting knowledge of censorship.

Missouri Attorney Andrew Bailey claimed that the litigation uncovered thorough censorship pushed by the Biden government in collaboration with social media platforms, leading to direct suppression of Americans online. This case has led to an injunction issued against the Biden government by a lower court, halting any communication with social media companies.

The Supreme Court, however, granted an emergency ruling against the injunction, and the case is now awaiting a final decision from the high court.

This isn’t the first time Justice Jackson has positioned herself far to the court’s political left. In her dissent from the majority opinion striking down US universities’ affirmative action policies, Jackson accused her colleagues of being akin to ostriches striking their heads in the sand. The liberal justice went on to claim that ending government racial discrimination would not end racism.

“The best that can be said of the majority’s perspective is that it proceeds (ostrich-like) from the hope that preventing consideration of race will end racism. But if that is its motivation, the majority proceeds in vain,” she wrote in her dissent.

Jackson was nominated to the court by Joe Biden in February 2022 and narrowly confirmed by the Senate in April 2022 by a margin of just six votes. Prior to her appointment to the Supreme Court, Jackson was noted for her extreme leniency towards child sex offenders.

show less
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson suggested Monday that the government has a right to censor American citizens for their own good. In the Murthy v. Missouri case, the Supreme Court probed allegations that the Biden government had violated the First Amendment by colluding with social media platforms to suppress Americans’ freedom of speech. Justice Jackson expressed concern for scenarios wherein she believes the government has the right to limit speech. show more

‘Appalled’ – RBG’s Family Demand Award Rebrand after Musk, Murdoch Receipt.

The family of the late Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg intends to withdraw her name from an award after SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and conservative media tycoon Rupert Murdoch were named two of this year’s awardees. The Ginsburg family’s decision is purportedly based on its disagreement with the recipients’ political beliefs.

“This year, the Opperman Foundation has strayed far from the original mission of the award and from what Justice Ginsburg stood for,” Jane Ginsburg, daughter of the Supreme Court justice, said in a statement.

The family is demanding Opperman remove Justice Ginsburg’s name from the award “unless the original award criteria, as accepted by Justice Ginsburg, are restored,” wrote Trevor Morrison, Ginsburg’s former law clerk, in a letter to the foundation’s chair on behalf of the Ginsburg family.

“Each of this year’s awardees has achieved notable success in their careers, and each may well deserve accolades of one form or another. But the decision to bestow upon them the particular honor of the RBG Award is a striking betrayal of the Justice’s legacy,” Morrison wrote.

“I think she’d be appalled,” said Ginsburg’s son, James Ginsburg, in an interview with CNN. “I think these are people who pretty much… stand against all the things that she stood for,” he said. “It so violates the purpose of what was intended here, and this is not what my mother signed on to when the award was first created,” he continued. “When you think about trying to create a more just society, which, of course, was mom’s ultimate goal, those are probably about the last names that would come to mind.”

show less
The family of the late Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg intends to withdraw her name from an award after SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and conservative media tycoon Rupert Murdoch were named two of this year’s awardees. The Ginsburg family’s decision is purportedly based on its disagreement with the recipients’ political beliefs. show more

Lindsey Graham Visits Kiev, Discusses Young Men.

During his visit to Ukraine, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) urged Ukrainian officials on Monday to rapidly adopt a bill that would increase the pool of eligible military draftees in the nation, suggesting there should be no exemptions for men under the age of 27.

“I would hope that those eligible to serve in the Ukrainian military would join. I can’t believe it’s at 27,” Graham told reporters. “You’re in a fight for your life, so you should be serving — not at 25 or 27,” he said, adding: “We need more people in the line,” he said.

During his first journey to Kiev following a sudden rebuff of a $60 billion aid package last month, Senator Graham said he was “more optimistic than I’ve ever been that something will get out of the House pretty soon.” The Senator’s visit to Ukraine also involved a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Ukraine is grappling with diminishing soldiers and ammunition as Russia capitalizes on significant battlefield victories. Ukraine’s discussions on a new mobilization law to decrease the draft age to 25 underline its lack of enough trained troops ready for combat.

Senator Graham has been a staunch advocate for further aid for Ukraine, visiting the country multiple times since 2022. Nevertheless, he surprisingly opposed an aid package last month, aligning with Donald Trump’s stance on negotiating aid as loan packages rather than outright grants.

During his meeting with President Zelensky, he stated that it was fair to expect Ukraine and other allies to repay the U.S. in the future, illustrating his belief that the loan idea would garner success not only among Republicans but Democrats as well.

Despite aid disagreements, Senator Graham assured the Ukrainian troops that the U.S. would supply more 155mm artillery shells, which they currently lack. He also expressed disappointment in the delay of U.S.-provided long-range missiles known as ATACMS, asserting their crucial need on the battleground.

show less
During his visit to Ukraine, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) urged Ukrainian officials on Monday to rapidly adopt a bill that would increase the pool of eligible military draftees in the nation, suggesting there should be no exemptions for men under the age of 27. show more

REVEALED: Epstein Island’s Reid Hoffman, Megadonor to E. Jean Carroll, Nikki Haley Funds MeidasTouch Group Behind ‘Bloodbath’ Hoax.

LinkedIn billionaire and Epstein island visitor Reid Hoffman, a megadonor to the Democrats, Nimarata ‘Nikki’ Haley, E. Jean Carroll, and the legal defense of Russia hoaxers FusionGPS, has also donated in large sums to the MeidasTouch Network. Founded by the three Meiselas brothers — Ben, Brett, and Jordy — the far-left media organization helped popularize the “bloodbath hoax” against Donald Trump over recent days.

MeidasTouch intentionally omitted that Trump was referring to an economic bloodbath for the auto industry in his speech in Ohio on Saturday. Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, alongside the corporate media, took up the theme, alleging the former president was threatening “political violence.”

The group has the support of many high-profile celebrities and political figures. The brothers Meisalas have employed a team of hardline ‘Never Trump’ activists to masquerade as journalists for their website, which began its life as a Democratic PAC.

Now, The National Pulse can reveal that one of the men who helped them get it off the ground was none other than Epstein-linked billionaire Hoffman, who also bankrolled the E. Jean Carroll case against Donald Trump, and threw cash at Nikki Haley prior to the abortion of her failed political campaign.

Hoffman has now been outed for visiting Epstein’s island in 2014 – long after Epstein’s conviction for procuring a girl below age 18 for prostitution – and even arranged to stay at the Manhattan townhouse where the financier abused many of his victims.

Hoffman admitted to The Wall Street Journal that “by lending my association, I helped [Epstein’s] reputation, and thus delayed justice for his survivors.” He claimed his last interaction with the convicted sex offender was in 2015.

Hoffman also “contributed more than $600,000 to the legal defense fund of Bean LLC — otherwise known as Fusion GPS, the company responsible for the creation of the Steele Dossier,” which spread various false accusations of links between Trump and Russia.


Support The National Pulse’s investigation work into MeidasTouch by joining today.

Jack Montgomery contributed to this report.

show less
LinkedIn billionaire and Epstein island visitor Reid Hoffman, a megadonor to the Democrats, Nimarata 'Nikki' Haley, E. Jean Carroll, and the legal defense of Russia hoaxers FusionGPS, has also donated in large sums to the MeidasTouch Network. Founded by the three Meiselas brothers — Ben, Brett, and Jordy — the far-left media organization helped popularize the “bloodbath hoax” against Donald Trump over recent days. show more