Saturday, April 25, 2026

Afghan Refugee, Not ‘White Supremacist’ Convicted in Muslim Community Murder.

Afghan refugee Muhammad Syed was convicted on Monday of first-degree murder in the shooting of 41-year-old Aftab Hussein in 2022 in New Mexico. This case marks one of three murders in Albuquerque’s Muslim community last summer. Syed is also due to stand trial for the other two alleged murders in the upcoming months.

During the trial, prosecutors unveiled cell phone data pinpointing Syed’s presence at the crime scene during the time of the shooting. A ballistics expert corroborated this, testifying that the bullet casings and projectiles from the crime scene matched a rifle found hidden under Syed’s bed.

While defense counsels disputed these claims, alleging a lack of concrete proof that Syed fired the weapon, the defense decided against calling witnesses. Syed declined to testify.

The prosecutions did not propose a motive for Syed’s actions nor talked about Syed’s interactions with Hussein before the murder. Amidst the sequence of three perplexing murders, the investigation initially suspected the perpetrator was a white supremacist who was motivated by religious or racial prejudice. After following the false white supremacist narrative – pushed by the corporate media – investigators eventually came to suspect a member of the area Muslim community.

Syed, alleged to have a history of violence, settled in the U.S. years before the murders occurred. His counsel previously argued against allowing the jury to hear allegations of domestic violence as they did not result in convictions. Syed has also been implicated in the murders of a city planner, Muhammad Afzaal Hussain, and Naeem Hussain, both of whom were shot dead in separate incidents.

show less
Afghan refugee Muhammad Syed was convicted on Monday of first-degree murder in the shooting of 41-year-old Aftab Hussein in 2022 in New Mexico. This case marks one of three murders in Albuquerque’s Muslim community last summer. Syed is also due to stand trial for the other two alleged murders in the upcoming months. show more

Trump Sues ABC News, George Stephanopoulos. Here’s Why…

Former President Donald Trump is taking digital broadcaster ABC News and its anchor, George Stephanopoulos, to court on defamation charges following an interview with Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC). During this interview, Stephanopoulos repeatedly said Trump was “found liable for rape” in the case of E. Jean Carroll, despite the official ruling characterizing the events as ‘sexual abuse.’

Trump’s lawsuit asserts that Stephanopoulos and ABC knowingly disseminated false information during the show, “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” mischaracterizing court verdicts and thereby damaging Trump’s public standing. The lawsuit focuses on the differentiation between legal definitions of ‘rape’ and ‘sexual abuse,’ challenging Stephanopoulos’s frequent usage of ‘rape’ to describe Trump’s alleged actions.

The discussion between Stephanopoulos and Mace became heated when the allegations against Trump were raised. Stephanopoulos repeatedly questioned Mace about her support for Trump, given her experience as a survivor of sexual assault. Stephanopoulos’s persistent characterization of the verdict as a ‘rape’ conviction, despite Mace’s reminders of its actual categorization as ‘sexual abuse,’ will now be scrutinized in court.

The lawsuit is part of an ongoing legal battle surrounding Trump’s interaction with Carroll, with the case being poised for appeal within the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. As it stands, Trump’s team vehemently refutes the charges of defamation, rendering this development the latest chapter in the controversy enveloping Trump’s alleged misconduct.

show less
Former President Donald Trump is taking digital broadcaster ABC News and its anchor, George Stephanopoulos, to court on defamation charges following an interview with Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC). During this interview, Stephanopoulos repeatedly said Trump was “found liable for rape” in the case of E. Jean Carroll, despite the official ruling characterizing the events as ‘sexual abuse.’ show more

‘Bloodbath’ Hoaxsters ‘MeidasTouch’ Used The Same Word Multiple Times in Past Social Posts.

MeidasTouch, the far-left news political action committee turned news organization that popularized the “bloodbath” hoax against Donald Trump, has used precisely the same term in the same way as the former president.

In a post by the official MeidasTouch X account from December 2023, the group described a debate between California Governor Gavin Newsom and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis as “a bloodbath” for DeSantis.

Brett Meiselas, one of the trio of brothers who founded MeidasTouch, also posted in December 2022 that a drop in Tesla stocks was an “absolute bloodbath.”

Donald Trump used the expression in the same way when talking about the consequences of Joe Biden allowing China to flood the U.S. with cars made in Mexico. Still, MeidasTouch, the corporate media, and the Biden campaign lied that he was threatening “political violence.”

The National Pulse has begun a wide-ranging investigation into MeidasTouch, which emerged in 2020 and rapidly established connections with big-money donors such as Reid Hoffman, a former guest of Jeffrey Epstein who has also funded the Nimarata ‘Nikki’ Haley, E. Jean Carroll, and FusionGPS.

https://twitter.com/BMeiselas/status/1605308845974097920

show less
MeidasTouch, the far-left news political action committee turned news organization that popularized the “bloodbath” hoax against Donald Trump, has used precisely the same term in the same way as the former president. show more

Lawyer Fighting Election Fraud Arrested After Passing Dominion Records to Law Enforcement.

Attorney Stefanie Lambert was arrested Monday in Washington, D.C., soon after a hearing into possible sanctions against her for disseminating confidential emails from Dominion Voting Systems. The United States Marshals Service stated that the arrest occurred due to “local charges.”

Lambert, who has been indicted for accessing Michigan voting machines following the 2020 election, failed to attend a prearranged hearing earlier in the month, leading to her arrest.

During the hearing, Lambert admitted to passing records from Dominion Voting Systems to law enforcement. Accompanying this, she included an affidavit from Dar Leaf, a county sheriff in northern Michigan known for investigating claims of election fraud.

She obtained the records through discovery while representing Patrick Byrne, whom Dominion was suing for defamation.

Byrne commented that Lambert “signed an NDA, but she found evidence of ongoing crime and reported it to law enforcement. If she found a severed head in [a] discovery box she had a duty to report it to law enforcement, too.”

show less
Attorney Stefanie Lambert was arrested Monday in Washington, D.C., soon after a hearing into possible sanctions against her for disseminating confidential emails from Dominion Voting Systems. The United States Marshals Service stated that the arrest occurred due to “local charges.” show more

Biometric Mass Surveillance Legalized in Europe.

The European Parliament (EP) has passed the AI Act, which critics warn enshrines biometric mass surveillance in law.

The EU announced the adoption of the act as a “landmark” event, touting it as a safeguard that “limit[s] the use of identification systems by law enforcement.” An official press release claims the act “aims to protect fundamental rights, democracy, the rule of law… from high-risk AI.”

The Act’s critics say the exact opposite is the case, asserting that the current legislation resulted from semi-secret negotiations between the EP, the European Commission, and the Council of the EU that lacked transparency and subverted the law’s original intent. MEP Patrick Beyer stated that the AI Act “effectively allows law enforcement the introduction of error-prone facial surveillance and facial recognition camera software in public spaces.”  The law, Beyer says, is poised to turn European nations into “high-tech surveillance states.”

Czech MEP Marcel Kolaja echoed Beyer’s concerns. He claimed that “national governments” inserted language laying the groundwork for legalized mass spying on citizens using cameras with AI biometric tech.

“Such cameras, equipped with artificial intelligence, are able to recognize people’s faces and thus keep track of who has been where, when, and with whom,” Kolaja said. “The AI Act should have banned such an Orwellian tool, but instead it explicitly legalizes it.”

show less
The European Parliament (EP) has passed the AI Act, which critics warn enshrines biometric mass surveillance in law. show more
Willis

Trump Files Motion to Disqualify Fani Willis from Georgia Case.

Donald Trump’s lawyers have put forward a motion to disqualify Democrat Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from an election interference case in Georgia.

Trump’s primary attorney in Georgia, Steve Sadow, wants a review of a court order allowing Willis to continue the case despite an “appearance of impropriety” arising from her undisclosed romantic entanglement with Nathan Wade, whom she hired as lead prosecutor.

“President Trump and seven defendants have jointly filed a motion requesting the court to grant a certificate of immediate review of its order denying dismissal of the case and disqualification of Fulton County DA Willis,” Sadow confirmed.

“The motion notes that the court found that Willis’ actions created an appearance of impropriety and an ‘odor of mendacity’ that lingers in this case, but it nonetheless refused to dismiss the case or disqualify her,” he added.

“The motion further notes that the court found Georgia case law lacks controlling precedent for the standard for disqualification of a prosecuting attorney for forensic misconduct. For these reasons, among others, the court’s order is ripe for pretrial appellate review.”

Judge Scott McAfee, who ruled Willis could remain on the case provided Wade was removed, previously donated to her.

show less
Donald Trump’s lawyers have put forward a motion to disqualify Democrat Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from an election interference case in Georgia. show more
comedy hate speech

Cops Target Comedy Under New Hate Crime Laws.

Scottish police are being instructed to target actors and comedians under new ‘hate crime’ laws. According to leaked police training documents, the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) law suggests that “threatening and abusive” material can be communicated “through public performance of a play.”

The new law consolidates several existing laws and creates a new offense — stirring up hatred against protected characteristics. These include age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, and transgender identity.

The leaked training documents focus on “how might threatening and or abusive material be communicated.” These are “by: displaying, publishing or distributing the material, for example on a sign, on the internet through websites, blogs, podcasts, social media etc, either directly, or by forwarding or repeating material that originates from a third party, through printed media such as magazine publications or leaflets.”

The document states that “giving, sending, showing or playing the material to another person” can be done “through online streaming, by email, playing a video, through public performance of a play.”

“If this is genuine Police Scotland training material, it appears to be at odds with the legislation which excludes plays from its scope,” said Scottish Conservative shadow justice secretary Russell Findlay. “This revelation adds to widespread concerns about Humza Yousaf’s hate crime law and needs to be explained.”
The UK has a reputation for stringent and controversial ‘hate crime’ laws. Last year, police arrested a politician for supporting the right to preach the bible. Females objecting to ‘trans female’ police officers strip-searching them face citations for ‘hate.’ The UK Labour Party is also pledging to make ‘misgendering’ transgenders an imprisonable offense.
show less
Scottish police are being instructed to target actors and comedians under new 'hate crime' laws. According to leaked police training documents, the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) law suggests that “threatening and abusive” material can be communicated “through public performance of a play.” show more

Trump Suggests He Could Deport Prince Harry For THIS Lie…

In an interview with Nigel Farage on GB News, President Donald Trump indicated that should the allegation of Prince Harry lying on his U.S. visa application prove true, the Duke of Sussex would not receive special treatment and would be deported. Prince Harry’s immigration status came under scrutiny following admissions of past drug use in his memoir, “Spare.”

The Heritage Foundation had previously challenged the prince’s immigration status, maintaining that confessed drug use makes an applicant ineligible under U.S. visa laws. Their request for an expedited release of Prince Harry’s immigration records via the Freedom of Information Act was, however, declined by the Department of Homeland Security, who perceived no sufficient public interest to override Prince Harry’s privacy interests.

In his interview with Farage, Trump further insinuated that Prince Harry “would be on his own” should he regain the presidency. He went on to suggest that the truth about Prince Harry’s past drug use should have been revealed long ago.

Amid these allegations, lawyers for the U.S. government noted that the drug claims in “Spare” do not constitute evidence of actual drug use. As of now, there is no evidence suggesting Prince Harry furnished false information on his visa application.

In February, Trump stated he “wouldn’t protect” the Duke of Sussex due to his decision to leave the Royal Family. Harry’s behavior since marrying Meghan Markle and his fall from the Royal Family’s grace has been watched closely by the public on both sides of the pond. Last year, Steve Bannon observed that Harry’s relationship with Meghan was a story of national decline.

show less
In an interview with Nigel Farage on GB News, President Donald Trump indicated that should the allegation of Prince Harry lying on his U.S. visa application prove true, the Duke of Sussex would not receive special treatment and would be deported. Prince Harry’s immigration status came under scrutiny following admissions of past drug use in his memoir, “Spare.” show more

Apparently the Word Homosexual’ is ‘Derogatory and Offensive’ Now.

In a revised Media Reference Guide, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) claims the term “homosexual” is “derogatory and offensive.”

The LGBTQ advocacy group described ‘homosexual’ as an “outdated clinical term,” claiming that its historical usage insinuates homosexuality is a disease or psychological disorder.

They further assert terms including “homosexual relations/relationship,” “homosexual couple,” and “homosexual sex” are leveraged by antagonists as tools to degrade LGBTQ people, their relationships, and their lifestyle.

In addition to ‘canceling’ the word “homosexual,” the group’s new guidelines also insinuate that terms like “gay” and “lesbian” are racist as they are “Eurocentric.” Instead, the new guidelines promote the term “same-gender loving.”

“Also known as SGL, this is a term used by some African American people as an Afrocentric alternative to what are considered Eurocentric, or white, identities like gay and lesbian. Coined by activist Cleo Manago in the 1990s, the term and its usage explicitly recognizes [sic] the histories and cultures of people of African descent,” the guidelines state.

The new guidelines received widespread criticism online, including from other homosexual groups. The homosexual group Gays Against Groomers (GAG) slammed the guidelines, stating: “An organization whose name literally stands for ‘Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation’ has now come out and declared the word homosexual to be outdated, derogatory, and offensive. They have replaced the term with ‘Same-Gender Loving,’ completely erasing biological sex, gay people and the decades of progress we fought to achieve in this country.”

show less
In a revised Media Reference Guide, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) claims the term “homosexual" is “derogatory and offensive.” show more