Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Migrant Restaurant Owner Charged in Terror Plot To Kill Jews.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A restaurant owner in England is accused of planning a gun attack targeting Jews.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Walid Saadaoui, a 38-year-old Tunisian national, co-defendant Amar Hussain, 52, and Saadaoui’s brother, Bilel Saadaoui, 36.

📍WHEN & WHERE: An attack was allegedly plotted between December 2023 and May 2024. Saadaoui owned a restaurant in Great Yarmouth before moving to Wigan.

🎯IMPACT: Police intervention reportedly prevented a potential mass casualty event. All defendants are denying the charges.

IN FULL

A Tunisian immigrant restaurant owner, Walid Saadaoui, is on trial at Preston Crown Court in England, accused of plotting a mass shooting targeting Jews. Prosecutors claim he intended to cause “untold harm.” Saadaoui, who denies preparing acts of terrorism, told jurors he arrived in the United Kingdom in 2012, worked in Clacton-on-Sea, and later bought the Albatross restaurant in Great Yarmouth in 2018. “I wanted to progress in life. I wanted to be my own boss,” he said, describing the restaurant as a thriving venue that hosted weddings and birthday parties.

Prosecutors allege that Saadaoui, his brother Bilel, and co-defendant Amar Hussain unknowingly disclosed details of their planned attack to an undercover officer. Saadaoui and Hussain both deny preparing acts of terrorism, while Bilel is accused of failing to disclose information about the alleged plot. Saadaoui is scheduled to give further evidence later this week.

The trial unfolds amid intensifying concerns about the safety and security of Jews in Britain. Jewish organisations have reported rising levels of anti-Semitic incidents in recent years, with community surveys showing that a growing number of British Jews feel less safe in public spaces. Tensions have been especially high following the fatal attack on the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue in Manchester, carried out by a Syrian migrant, Jihad al-Shamie, during Yom Kippur. Two worshippers were killed in that attack. Authorities later confirmed that al-Shamie had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State. It also emerged that al-Shamie had been on bail in a rape investigation at the time of the attack, raising further questions about risk assessment and monitoring.

Concerns have been further heightened by recent policing decisions, including restrictions placed on Israeli Jewish soccer fans attending certain matches in areas with large numbers of Muslims due to security fears. National and local officials have warned that no British city should become a “no-go area” for Jews.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

‘Tourist Tax’ Set to Make Visiting Khan’s London Even More Expensive.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A “tourist tax” is set to be introduced in London, England, allowing the mayor to impose a levy on overnight stays in hotels and short-term accommodations.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Chancellor (Treasury Secretary) Rachel Reeves, Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, UKHospitality, and other business groups.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The powers could be introduced through the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill currently before Parliament; Chancellor Reeves is expected to announce this in her Budget on November 26.

💬KEY QUOTE: “[M]any of us visit [European Union cities] and don’t really mind paying the extra few euros, in relation to a tourism levy.” – Mayor Khan on other cities that have implemented tourist taxes.

🎯IMPACT: The proposed levy could raise £250 million (~$342m) annually, but industry groups warn it could drive up prices, potentially impacting tourism and local businesses.

IN FULL

London, England, is preparing for a major policy change, as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Chancellor of the Exchequer (Treasury Secretary) Rachel Reeves is expected to unveil a new tourist tax during the November 26 Budget. The plan would allow the Mayor of London, Labour’s Sir Sadiq Khan, and other local officials to impose charges on overnight stays in hotels, Airbnbs, and other short-term rentals. The measure is likely to be delivered through the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, which is currently before Parliament.

Mayor Khan has been a strong supporter of the idea, noting that cities such as Paris, New York, and Tokyo already impose similar fees. “The thing about those cities is, many of us visit them, and don’t really mind paying the extra few euros, in relation to a tourism levy,” he claimed earlier this year.

Supporters say the levy could generate roughly £250 million (~$342m) a year. Industry groups, however, warn that it could push up prices for travelers, who are already contributing to the local economy by spending money there, and discourage them from visiting. UKHospitality called the proposal “shocking.”

Other parts of Britain are already moving ahead with similar measures. Edinburgh and Glasgow, in Scotland, are planning a five percent tax on short stays beginning next year. Wales has approved a national tourist levy, set to take effect in 2027.

Reeves, who had previously voiced doubts about tourist taxes, now appears convinced they could provide a valuable new revenue stream. Her upcoming budget is expected to include several other tax changes, including a gambling tax and a new road fee for electric vehicles.

The debate over London’s visitor economy comes at a moment when the city is facing broader concerns about migration and pressure on hotels. Recent controversies include hotels removing guests or firing staff so they can house newly arrived boat migrants, some of whom have become embroiled in high-profile criminal cases.

Image by Steve Eason.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

UK Labour Party Labels Farage ‘Today’s Enoch Powell’… As If That’s A Bad Thing?

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: British Business Secretary Peter Kyle compared Reform Party leader Nigel Farage to former Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) Enoch Powell, who warned in the 1960s of the disastrous consequences of mass migration, describing him as “today’s incarnation” of Powell’s politics.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Peter Kyle, Nigel Farage, and other speakers at the Co-operative Party conference, including Communities Secretary Steve Reed.

📍WHEN & WHERE: November 15, at the Co-operative Party conference.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Lack of economic growth is the cause. Nigel Farage, today’s incarnation of the politics of Enoch Powell, is the effect” – Peter Kyle

🎯IMPACT: The remarks drew attention to the ongoing influence of Powell, who passed away in 1998, over the immigration debate and British politics legacy.

IN FULL

Britain’s Business Secretary Peter Kyle attempted to smear Reform UK leader Nigel Farage at the Co-operative Party conference on November 15, describing him as “today’s incarnation of the politics of Enoch Powell.” Enoch Powell, who passed away in 1998, is well-known for a host of achievements, including being the youngest professor in the British Empire in 1937 at only 25 years old, and a highly decorated war veteran, signing up for the army in October of 1939 as a private and ending the Second World War as a brigadier, the equivalent of a brigadier general, the youngest in the British army. However, he is best remembered for his so-called “Rivers of Blood” speech in 1968, where he warned that mass migration was causing social disintegration.

Kyle, a member of the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s leftist Labour Party government, argued that Britain’s stalled economic growth is eroding confidence in democratic institutions and creating space for “the parties of the far right,” whose “dogma of disruption, division and despair” has become “alluring.”

He said the political approach of Nigel Farage’s Reform Party resembles that of the quasi-fascist National Front and the British National Party in previous decades. He added, “Lack of economic growth is the cause. Nigel Farage, today’s incarnation of the politics of Enoch Powell, is the effect.”

In his “Rivers of Blood” speech, Powell warned, “Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.” Powell’s intervention received broad public support, but a furious reaction from the political class, with the Conservatives’ then-leader, Edward “Ted” Heath, expelling him from the Shadow Cabinet.

Notably, gross immigration to Britain in 2024 stood at around 950,000 a year.

Kyle’s remarks reflect an ongoing tension between Kyle and Farage. Earlier this year, they clashed during debates over the Online Safety Act, with Kyle accusing Farage of siding with harmful influences by opposing the legislation, which empowers the authorities to further censor the Internet and prosecute online speech. Farage rejected the accusation and condemned the Act as a threat to free expression, even testifying about the legislation to the U.S. Congress earlier this year.

Immigration to Britain reached historic highs under Conservative former prime ministers Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, and remains high under Starmer, putting pressure on public services, limiting integration, and undermining social cohesion. Rising illegal immigration and high levels of crime among migrants, particularly sex crimes, have intensified public concerns.

The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam, a former adviser to Nigel Farage, revisited Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech in his book Enoch Was Right: “Rivers of Blood” 50 Years On in 2018. Kassam argues that many of Powell’s warnings about migration, demographics, and social cohesion have proved prescient, and asserts that political leaders have avoided serious engagement with Powell’s arguments by dismissing them as racist rather than debating them directly.

Enoch Was Right: “Rivers of Blood” 50 Years On can be purchased here.

Image by Allan Warren.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

The British Govt is FINALLY Proposing Asylum Reforms. Here’s Their Plan…

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The United Kingdom’s Labour government has unveiled plans to overhaul the country’s asylum laws, supposedly to make it more difficult to seek asylum and attain permanent residence in Britain.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Labour Party, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Reform Party leader Nigel Farage, and asylum seekers.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood in Parliament this weekend.

💬KEY QUOTE: “These reforms will block endless appeals, stop last-minute claims and scale up removals of those with no right to be here.” — Keir Starmer

🎯IMPACT: While parts of Labour’s far-left political base are already working to stop Starmer’s proposed reforms, skeptics suggest that the creation of new “safe and legal” routes for migrants to claim asylum could see the number of migrants overall remain the same or even rise, even if arrivals by sea and other clandestine means decrease. 

IN FULL

The United Kingdom’s Labour government has unveiled plans to overhaul the country’s asylum laws, ostensibly to make it more difficult to seek asylum and attain permanent residence in Britain. The changes were unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood in Parliament this weekend, with Starmer stating: “These reforms will block endless appeals, stop last-minute claims and scale up removals of those with no right to be here.”

Labour’s leadership is billing the changes as the most comprehensive and sweeping in the history of modern Britain. Asylum seekers, under the new policies, will face a quadrupled length of time before they can receive permanent settlement in the United Kingdom. Additionally, refugee status will now only be temporary.

According to Starmer and Mahmood, the current system allows so-called refugees to abuse Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to essentially delay indefinitely their removal from the United Kingdom. The Labour government is seeking to enact new laws that clarify the meaning of a “family connection” which will legally limit the term to only a direct family member, such as a parent or child. In addition, the United Kingdom is seeking a multi-country review of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ definition of torture, arguing it is too expansive and is being used to claim asylum status where it truly isn’t applicable.

While parts of Labour’s far-left political base are already working to stop Starmer’s proposed reforms, skeptics note that they include the creation of new “safe and legal” routes for asylum seekers, and could result in the number of migrants overall remaining the same or even rising, even if the number of illegal boat migrants falls.

Election polls consistently show Brexit-leader Nigel Farage‘s Reform Party outpacing Labour for a majority in Parliament, putting Farage himself on pace to be the United Kingdom’s next prime minister.

Notably, Farage’s popularity has soared in most part because of his outspoken stance on immigration and the need for drastic changes to the United Kingdom’s asylum laws. The data also backs Farage, with immigration and asylum reform consistently being the top issues for Britons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Recently Fired UK Ambassador Caught P*ssing In the Street.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Former British Ambassador to the United States Lord Peter Mandelson was photographed urinating against a wall in Notting Hill, London, after an evening at former Chancellor George Osborne’s home.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Lord Mandelson,  George Osborne, and property owner James Reed.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on Wednesday evening in Notting Hill, central London.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There is no disguising my embarrassment.” – Lord Mandelson

🎯IMPACT: The incident adds to the controversies surrounding Lord Mandelson, who was ousted from his ambassadorship following revelations concerning his friendship with deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

IN FULL

Lord Peter Mandelson, the recently-ousted British Ambassador to the United States, was photographed urinating on a wall in Notting Hill, London, after leaving the home of former Chancellor of the Exchequer (Treasury Secretary) George Osborne on Wednesday evening. The wall reportedly belongs to James Reed, of Reed Recruitment, who expressed surprise that a neighbor did not offer Lord Mandelson a restroom. “It doesn’t seem very diplomatic,” Reed quipped.

An anonymous witness criticized Mandelson’s behavior, describing the Labour Party grandee’s behavior as “revolting” and more suitable for the crime-ridden Notting Hill Carnival.

Lord Mandelson apologized for the incident, citing a lengthy wait for a taxi as the reason for his actions. “I was stood up by two Uber drivers and kept waiting in the street for half an hour, and was bursting,” he claimed.

Lord Mandelson, a former European Commissioner and member of the Tony Blair and Gordon Brown Cabinets, has long been dogged by scandals and faced renewed scrutiny ahead of his ouster over his longstanding friendship with deceased child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, which he maintained long after his initial conviction for soliciting minors.

This has resulted in the loss of several honorary titles, in addition to his ambassadorship, including his removal from the list of honorary fellows at St Catherine’s College, Oxford.

Image by World Economic Forum swiss-image.ch/Photo by Remy Steinegger.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Poll: Britons Think Their Country Has Gone Down the Drain.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A global Ipsos poll revealed that Britons are among the most dissatisfied with the progress of the past 50 years, with many believing life was happier and safer decades ago.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ipsos pollsters and respondents from the United Kingdom and other nations worldwide.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The poll was conducted recently and included participants from various countries, with a focus on the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “These results reflect a widespread dissatisfaction with the current direction of our country … when we ask people to compare present times with the past, they perceive a nation that was happier and more secure.” – Ipsos UK Managing Director Trinh Tu.

🎯IMPACT: The findings highlight a growing sense of unease and dissatisfaction among Britons, with implications for societal cohesion.

IN FULL

A new international survey by Ipsos indicates that Britons are among the most dissatisfied populations when comparing life today with life 50 years ago. The research asked adults in 30 countries whether their nation was happier and safer in 1975 or in 2025.

In the United Kingdom, 63 percent of respondents said the country was happier in 1975, while only 12 percent believe life is better in 2025. The figure places Britain well above the global average for dissatisfaction, as 55 percent of respondents overall said their nations were happier half a century ago. France recorded the highest level of unhappiness, with about 70 percent of respondents saying life was better in the 1970s.

Feelings about safety followed a similar pattern. Sixty percent of Britons said the country was safer in 1975, compared with 17 percent who said it is safer today. On the question of global conflict, 44 percent of British respondents said the world was less at risk of war in 1975, while only 16 percent said the world is safer now.

Notably, Ipsos reported that most British respondents expressing these views were not alive in 1975, suggesting the sentiment reflects broad public unease rather than direct personal memory. Commenting on the findings, Ipsos UK Managing Director Trinh Tu said: “These results reflect a widespread dissatisfaction with the current direction of our country … when we ask people to compare present times with the past, they perceive a nation that was happier and more secure.”

Reform Party leader Nigel Farage reacted by saying: “The centre is moving very rapidly … all of this indicates the public have just had enough.”

The poll comes at a time when wider public anxieties about crime, migration, and social change continue to dominate national debate. Several recent reports have raised concerns about migrant-related crime. Certain migrant nationalities show much higher incarceration rates than average. A recent whistleblower even warned that some migrants with serious criminal histories, like sex offenses, have been granted asylum by the British government despite their dangerous past.

Hundreds of migrants living in taxpayer-funded hotels have been charged with serious offences, and migrants are as much as 70 percent more likely to be arrested for sex crimes compared to native Britons.

Notably, these findings follow a viral moment ahead of Remembrance Sunday, when 100-year-old Second World War veteran Alec Penstone lamented on national television that his slain comrades’ sacrifice was not worth it for “the country of today.”

Image by Alisdare Hickson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Board Member at ‘Impartial’ BBC Branded Trump a ‘Howling Idiot.’

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A BBC board member, Muriel Gray, described President Donald J. Trump as a “howling idiot” in social media posts before her appointment.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Muriel Gray, President Donald J. Trump, BBC board members, and other political figures.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Posts made prior to Gray’s appointment in January 2022; the BBC has been under scrutiny in recent days over manipulative coverage of President Trump.

💬KEY QUOTE: Muriel Gray described President Trump as “just a howling idiot shouting into the abyss.”

🎯IMPACT: The remarks have drawn further attention to political bias on the BBC board following its handling of a scandal involved a doctored Trump speech.

IN FULL

Muriel Gray, a member of the BBC Board and a former television presenter, is facing scrutiny over a series of social media posts she made about President Donald J. Trump before joining the corporation’s governing body in January 2022. In one message posted after Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory, Gray described Trump as “just a howling idiot shouting into the abyss.” Other posts from the same period referred to him as “useless” and included remarks mocking then–First Lady Melania Trump. Gray has not commented publicly since the resurfacing of the messages.

The de facto state broadcaster, funded by a compulsory television license fee, is under intense scrutiny after it emerged that an edited version of Trump’s January 6, 2021 speech, aired in a BBC Panorama programme, stitched together lines from different parts of the address in a way that gave the impression he urged supporters toward violence.

A whistleblower revealed that the clip had been manipulated, sparking a series of reports on BBC bias. Because televsion owners are forced to fund the broadcaster, it is required to be impartial and nonpartisan—although it is widely believed to suffer systemic left-wing bias, with successive governments doing little to rein it in.

The BBC has apologised for the doctored clip, and its India-born chairman, Samir Shah, issued a personal apology to the White House as Trump announced plans to pursue legal action, accusing the corporation of defamation. However, a second doctored Trump clip has since surfaced, intensifying criticism of the broadcaster’s editorial processes.

The fallout has been sweeping. Director General Tim Davie and CEO of News Deborah Turness have both resigned, acknowledging the serious damage caused by the incident. Left-wing Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s government has signalled that political appointments to the board may be reviewed as part of an upcoming charter renewal.

A BBC spokesman said all board members are bound by the organization’s governance rules and emphasised that the corporation is committed to addressing the failures that led to the misleading Panorama broadcast.

Image by Sebastiandoe5.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Zucker-Linked $658 Million Telegraph Purchase Deal Falls Through.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: RedBird Capital has withdrawn its £500 million (~$658 million) bid for the Telegraph Media Group, ending a two-year takeover process.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: RedBird Capital Partners, IMI, Telegraph Media Group, and its employees, including editor Chris Evans and CEO Anna Jones.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made this week, following a process that began in 2021 in the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The Telegraph deserves owners who care about journalism and who will invest.” – Chris Evans

🎯IMPACT: The future ownership of the Telegraph Media Group remains uncertain, with efforts now shifting to find a new buyer.

IN FULL

RedBird Capital Partners has withdrawn its £500 million (~$658 million) bid to acquire Britain’s Telegraph Media Group, ending a takeover saga that has lasted more than two years. A spokesman for RedBird said, “We remain fully confident that the Telegraph and its world-class team have a bright future ahead of them and will work hard to secure a solution which is in the best interests of employees and readers.”

The decision follows internal resistance from senior staff as well as scrutiny triggered by the bid’s structure. Chris Evans, editor of The Telegraph newspaper, acknowledged the widespread concerns across the newsroom, saying, “It’s no secret that all senior editors and many writers had concerns about the bid. On the other hand, it’s also obvious that this process has gone on far, far too long. The Telegraph deserves owners who care about journalism and who will invest.”

Telegraph Media Group CEO Anna Jones thanked employees for enduring the prolonged period of uncertainty, saying, “I will now work with the board of independent directors on next steps and what this means for the future ownership of the business. This process has been challenging and unpredictable but your hard work and continued patience is a credit to you all.”

RedBird’s withdrawal marks the second failed attempt to bring the Telegraph under the influence of its partnership, led by former CNN president Jeff Zucker and Abu Dhabi–backed International Media Investments (IMI). Zucker was previously linked to attempts to take over both the Telegraph and The Spectator in 2023, raising questions about foreign influence over British media. Those plans stalled after the British government introduced legislation preventing foreign governments from owning British newspapers. Zucker’s involvement again drew scrutiny in 2024 and 2025, with critics pointing to IMI’s close ties to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Zucker insisted he would resign if any interference occurred.

The collapse of the latest deal leaves The Telegraph back on the market as its board searches for a buyer who can satisfy political, regulatory, and editorial expectations at a time when the broader British media industry faces an escalating crisis of confidence. The BBC, for instance, is confronting significant turmoil over a purposely falsified speech by President Donald J. Trump on January 6, 2021, to make it appear he had incited violence. The fallout triggered the resignation of senior BBC executives, including Director-General Tim Davie, and has intensified public scrutiny of journalistic standards across major British outlets.

Image by Robert Scoble.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Police Investigating Only a Fraction of Identified Child Sex Abuse Cases in Khan’s London.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Metropolitan Police is investigating only “tens of cases” related to child sex abuse gangs in London, despite identifying 9,000 historic cases weeks ago.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, and London Assembly members, including Susan Hall.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The update was provided during a London Assembly meeting on Thursday in London.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It is important for us to use precise language and consider its impact on victims and public understanding,” said Sir Mark Rowley.

🎯IMPACT: The investigation faces challenges due to the scale of cases, resource limitations, and the need for clarity in public discourse.

IN FULL

The Metropolitan Police in London, England, say they are currently pursuing only “tens of cases” in their large-scale review of historic child sex abuse, even though nearly 9,000 were initially flagged for potential reinvestigation. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley told officials, including London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, that after examining 2,200 of those cases in detail, just 1,200 still fell within the parameters of the inquiry. However, he added that once all preliminary checks are completed, an estimated 2,000 to 3,000 cases may ultimately qualify for renewed investigation.

Rowley urged caution in describing the review as a probe into “grooming gangs,” explaining that the national audit had used an expansive definition that included familial abuse, institutional failures, peer-on-peer exploitation, and online offending. Because of this wide scope, he warned that the public perception of grooming gangs does not necessarily align with the types of cases being examined. He stressed that the offenders reflect “the diversity of London’s population,” which is around two-thirds non-white.

“We do not see the typology reported elsewhere where there have been cases of offending committed by groups of Pakistani men on white British children being the sole or majority case,” he claimed.

Mayor Sadiq Khan also faced criticism over accusations that he downplayed grooming gang concerns and mocked victims by Conservative Susan Hall. “In January, I asked if we had grooming gangs in London. You dismissed my question by pretending you didn’t know what I meant,” Hall said.

Other investigations have described police and social services repeatedly missing opportunities to intervene, particularly in cases involving vulnerable white girls targeted by older South Asian men working in coordinated groups. Police and local officials feared being accused of racism, or damaging so-called “community relations.”

Police forces outside London have recently announced new arrests linked to historic grooming gang abuse, including a case in West Yorkshire in which 19 men were detained on suspicion of offences such as rape, sexual assault, and trafficking.

Image by Jon Clempner.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Rubio Denies Report of UK Halting Intel Sharing Due to Cartel Boat Strikes.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio denied claims that Britain has stopped sharing intelligence on drug-trafficking vessels due to concerns about U.S. military actions in the Caribbean.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, British intelligence services, and Group of Seven foreign ministers.

📍WHEN & WHERE: November 12, 2025, at the John C. Munro Hamilton International Airport, Ontario, Canada.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is a false story,” said Rubio, referring to the claims of suspended intelligence sharing.

🎯IMPACT: Rubio reaffirmed the strong U.S.-UK partnership and dismissed concerns about disrupted intelligence cooperation.

IN FULL

Speaking to journalists at the John C. Munro Hamilton International Airport in Ontario, Canada, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio denied claims that Britain had ceased intelligence sharing on drug-trafficking vessels. Rubio called the reports a “false story,” stating that the United States and the United Kingdom continue to maintain a strong partnership.

“I did see a CNN report yesterday—I’m not going to go into great detail other than to say that it’s a false story. It’s a fake story,” the U.S Secretary of State said, continuing: “And what’s happening now is people with a business card that has a government email on it become sources because they don’t know—they’re not even in the know, so they either have an agenda or they want to make themselves important, and it’s been a plague of story after story that’s either inaccurate or misleading, and that falls in the category of both, that story does.”

Rubio was responding to a CNN report suggesting that Britain had suspended intelligence sharing due to concerns over U.S. military actions against narco-terrorists in the Caribbean. He went on to emphasize, “We have very strong partnerships with the UK and other countries. Again, nothing has changed or happened that has impeded in any way our ability to do what we’re doing, nor are we asking anyone to help us with what we’re doing at any—in any realm, and that includes military.”

The comments came after a meeting of Group of Seven (G7) foreign ministers in Canada. Rubio noted that the operations near Venezuela were not raised during the discussions and that Britain had not expressed any concerns directly to him.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more