Wednesday, October 1, 2025

UK Prime Minister Approved Associating Nigel Farage With Notorious Pedophile to Defend Censorship Law.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: Reports suggest that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s office approved of comments linking Reform Party leader Nigel Farage to notorious pedophile Jimmy Savile due to his opposition to the censorship-enabling Online Safety Act.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, British Science Secretary Peter Kyle.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Science Secretary Kyle made the initial comments on July 29.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he would be perpetrating his crimes online, and Nigel Farage is saying that he is on their side, not the side of children.” – Peter Kyle

🎯IMPACT: The reports reveal the desperation of the Labour government, which is becoming increasingly unpopular, to smear Farage—whose party is eight points ahead of Labour—and defend its censorship apparatus.

IN FULL

The office of the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, reportedly approved comments made by Science Secretary Peter Kyle linking Reform Party leader Nigel Farage to child predators over Farage’s opposition to the Online Safety Act. Multiple government sources report that Kyle consulted No. 10 Downing Street, the Prime Minister’s official residence, before an appearance on Sky News on July 29, where he sparked controversy by claiming Mr Farage was “on the side” of pedophiles and extreme pornographers.

“Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he would be perpetrating his crimes online, and Nigel Farage is saying that he is on their side, not the side of children,” Kyle said in reference to Farage’s pledge to repeal the Online Safety Act, which contains some child protection provisions but has a broader purpose as a tool of mass censorship, already being used to suppress even content showing parliamentary debates on Muslim grooming gangs.

X (formerly Twitter) users in Britain have seen their posts censored for including footage of anti-mass migration protests—content that has nothing to do with the exploitation of children.

Jimmy Savile, a former BBC radio and television personality, was one of the United Kingdom’s most prolific and notorious pedophiles, with it being widely accepted that his abuse was an open secret ignored by the national broadcaster, National Health Service (NHS) hospitals where he abused patients under the guise of performing charity work, and other establishment institutions.

Attempting to link Farage to Savile could backfire on Prime Minister Starmer, however, as he was Director of Public Prosecutions when the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to charge him.

On Wednesday, Starmer’s Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander, echoed Kyle’s smears in another Sky News interview, saying, “Nigel Farage is, in effect, saying that he is [on pedophiles’] side, because he’s saying he’s wanting to repeal the Online Safety Act. In effect, what Nigel Farage is saying is that he’s totally happy for there to be a free-for-all on the Internet.”

“That’s not the position of the Labour Government. It’s not the position of me. It’s not the position of Keir Starmer or Peter Kyle, and that is the point that the Technology Secretary was rightly making yesterday,” she stressed.

Farage has called for an apology, branding the remarks “disgusting” and accusing Mr Kyle of becoming the “Minister for Political Slander.”

Notably, Reform is currently polling eight points ahead of Labour and has launched a summer campaign on crime that challenges Starmer’s record on law and order.

Labour is clearly rattled by its collapse in support alongside Reform’s rise, and has begun targeting Farage personally, with campaign materials featuring messages such as “Don’t gamble on Farage.”

Image via No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Boat Migrants Cause ‘Chaos’ at Sea After Trump’s Warning to Europe.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: More than 500 migrants attempted to cross the English Channel from France to the United Kingdom in small boats, leading to chaotic scenes at sea and a large-scale rescue response.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Britain’s Border Force, French border patrol vessels, and boat migrants.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The English Channel, with incidents reported throughout the past week, culminating in a significant surge today.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “It’s clear yet again, Border Force just can’t cope with the numbers attempting to cross today. They’ve had to call on very significant resources from the lifeboat service.” — a senior maritime security source

🎯IMPACT: If these crossings are successful, the total number of illegal migrants crossing this year will surpass 25,000, presenting a significant challenge to UK authorities.

IN FULL

British Border Force vessels were reportedly overwhelmed on July 30 by the sheer number of migrant boats attempting to cross the English Channel from France. Multiple lifeboats from Dover, Ramsgate, Walmer, and Dungeness were called to assist Border Force vessels. This follows President Donald J. Trump’s warning on a trip to Scotland that Europe must “get [its] act together” on illegal immigration or be irrevocably transformed.

French border patrol vessels and lifeboats were observed escorting several migrant dinghies towards Britain—instead of towing them back—despite changeable weather conditions in the Channel over the past week, with choppy waters that have caused drowning in the past.

A senior maritime security source described the current situation as “complete chaos.” Reports indicate that approximately 1,000 migrants have made the illegal journey over the past seven days, with today marking a significant spike due to improved weather conditions overnight.

The total number of illegal crossings this year is now approaching over 25,000, despite Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer recently assuring President Trump that the British authorities were making progress against smuggling gangs.

Starmer had promised to “smash the gangs” when entering office in mid-2024, but the number of illegal entries has only increased. Many migrants end up in taxpayer-funded hotels once they arrive, which has also been a significant source of controversy in recent weeks. In Epping, protests erupted following the arrest of an illegal immigrant from Africa accused of multiple sexual assaults of children. The man had been in Britain for less than a month before his arrest.

“Europe is a much different place than it was just five years ago, 10 years ago,” President Trump said of the “horrible invasion” across the continent on Monday. “They’ve got to get their act together. If they don’t, you’re not going to have Europe anymore, as you know it.”

Image by Acabashi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

King Charles ‘Very Concerned’ Trump Will Criticize Mass Migration During State Visit: Report.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. President Donald Trump criticized Europe’s handling of immigration on a visit to Scotland, calling it a “horrible invasion.” King Charles III is reportedly wary that the President could make similar comments when he hosts him for a state visit in September.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, King Charles, Nigel Farage, and unnamed royal sources.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump made the remarks on Friday during a visit to Scotland, ahead of a planned state visit to the United Kingdom in September.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “You better get your act together or you’re not going to have Europe anymore.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Concerns have been raised by royal sources about potential political remarks during a state banquet.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump’s criticism of Europe’s lax immigration policies during his recent visit to Scotland is reportedly sparking concerns about his upcoming state visit to the United Kingdom in September, where he is expected to attend a banquet at Windsor Castle. The source, a civil servant described as close to the Royal Family, stated that “[King] Charles has spent his entire life promoting tolerance and compassion.”

“He will be appalled by what Trump said on Friday, which seems to be entirely driven by his domestic agenda, and will be very concerned about the possibility of a repeat of Trump’s outburst in September,” the royal source claimed in a recent media interview.

“If Trump starts sounding off about the evils of immigration to the cameras while the King is standing next to him, the King would find that hard to take,” said a source described as a “friend of the King.”

During his trip to Scotland last week, President Trump blasted European leaders for failing to stop a “horrible invasion” of illegal immigrants, arguing that the influx of foreign nationals is “killing Europe.” The America First leader issued a stern warning, saying, “You better get your act together or you’re not going to have Europe anymore.”

Immigration has been a contentious issue in the United Kingdom, with record numbers of small boats carrying illegal immigrants across the English Channel this year. Reform Party leader Nigel Farage has warned that the country is nearing “civil disobedience on a vast scale” over the crisis.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

UK PM Defends Crackdown on Internet Freedoms.

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: The United Kingdom implemented the Online Safety Act (OSA) last week, granting extensive censorship powers to the unelected regulator Ofcom and targeting online speech deemed “harmful.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Ofcom, Nigel Farage’s Reform Party, and social media companies operating in Britain.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The legislation came into effect on Friday across the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The OSA plunges this country into a borderline dystopian state.” – Zia Yusuf, Reform Party

🎯IMPACT: The act imposes significant fines on companies failing to comply, restricts free speech, and could set a dangerous precedent for online censorship.

IN FULL

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has defended the censorious Online Safety Act and insisted Britain “had free speech for a very, very long time” and will continue to do so. Critics argue the legislation marks the end of that tradition, which is already ineffective due to laws allowing people to be prosecuted for “grossly offensive” communications and other forms of expression by enabling widespread censorship under the guise of “online safety.”

The Online Safety Act, passed by the formerly governing Conservative (Tory) Party government but only effective from Friday, grants the unelected regulator Ofcom the power to enforce a “duty of care” on websites. Under this framework, social media companies must remove content Ofcom deems harmful or face fines of up to $24 million or 10 percent of global revenue, whichever is higher.

Ofcom’s definition of “harmful content” is broad, encompassing criticisms of government policies, including immigration and COVID-19 measures—not just sexually explicit content, as its defenders imply. Zia Yusuf, of Nigel Farage’s Reform Party, described the act as plunging Britain into a “borderline dystopian state.” Farage himself has pledged to repeal the legislation if Reform takes over the government.

Social media platforms are now required to verify users’ ages and adjust algorithms to block inappropriate content for children. Critics argue this effectively censors conservative viewpoints and dissenting opinions, as the rules apply extraterritorially, potentially impacting American users. Notably, it has already restricted not only minors’ access to pornography, but also parliamentary debates on Muslim grooming gangs.

Some British Internet users have tried to bypass the legislation using Virtual Private Networks (VPN), which allow users to get around geographic-based restrictions online. Figures from within Stamrer’s Labour Party are mulling banning the use of VPNs in response.

The Trump administration has been urged to act against this legislation, with concerns that the Starmer government could collaborate with U.S. Democrats to bypass First Amendment protections for social media users.

Picture by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

UK Grooming Gangs Scandal Widens: Police Officers Accused of Joining Abuse.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Five women, previously exploited by grooming gangs in Rotherham, England, allege they were also abused by police officers.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The allegations involve former officers of South Yorkshire Police (SYP) and victims of Muslim rape gangs.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The alleged incidents occurred in Rotherham between the mid-1990s and early 2000s.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “There has been no accountability in the town—and without accountability, there will continue to be a distrust of South Yorkshire Police.” – Amy Clowrey, Switalskis Solicitors

🎯IMPACT: A new investigation led by SYP’s major crime unit is underway, with oversight from the Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC).

IN FULL

In Rotherham, England, five women who were victims of Muslim grooming gangs as children have come forward with allegations of abuse by police officers as well. One woman recounts being raped by a South Yorkshire Police officer in a marked vehicle, under the threat of being handed back to her abusers if she resisted.

The Jay Report of 2014 previously identified that over 1,400 mostly white girls were abused by gangs comprised mostly of Pakistani-heritage Muslim men in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. The new investigation by SYP’s major crime unit seeks to address the involvement of police officers in these heinous acts. However, Professor Alexis Jay, who led the initial inquiry, expressed her shock at SYP’s self-investigation, and suggested that an independent body should handle it.

The BBC reports it has seen testimony from 30 women, with allegations of police officers’ misconduct during the same period they were targeted by grooming gangs. These accounts have been collected by Switalskis Solicitors, who are also pursuing a civil claim against the police force. “There has been no accountability in the town—and without accountability, there will continue to be a distrust of South Yorkshire Police,” Amy Clowrey of the Switalskis Solicitors stated.

“I’m sure that the full truth in terms of the level of corruption and the extent of it in Rotherham has yet to come out,” said another member of the law firm.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

UK Threatens to Recognize Palestinian State Unless Israel Meets Aid Demands.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state in September if Israel does not take steps to alleviate the crisis in Gaza.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Donald J. Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, and other members of the British cabinet.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Starmer’s announcement followed an emergency virtual Cabinet meeting over the weekend and discussions with international leaders.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “The Palestinian people have endured terrible suffering now in Gaza because of a catastrophic failure of aid. We see starving babies, children too weak to stand, images that will stay with us for a lifetime. The suffering must end.” – Keir Starmer

🎯IMPACT: Starmer’s decision puts pressure on Israel to act and has sparked debate within the British Cabinet and internationally.

IN FULL

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has warned that his government will formally recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September unless Israel takes “substantive steps” to ease the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Britain’s recognition is being positioned as conditional, hinging on actions including ending “starvation tactics,” agreement to a ceasefire, and a commitment to a comprehensive peace process.

“The Palestinian people have endured terrible suffering now in Gaza because of a catastrophic failure of aid,” Starmer said. “We see starving babies, children too weak to stand, images that will stay with us for a lifetime. The suffering must end.”

The issue of recognizing Palestinian statehood has sparked debate within Starmer’s Cabinet. Senior Labour figures, including Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Foreign Secretary David Lammy, back the recognition, while others, such as Chancellor Rachel Reeves, have expressed concern, warning that the move could potentially “reward Hamas.”

In recent days, Starmer met with President Donald J. Trump in Scotland to discuss the crisis. Trump has said he and Starmer “never discussed” the issue, but that his position is that recognizing Palestinian statehood is indeed “rewarding Hamas,” and he is “not about to do that.”

However, the America First leader has been at odds with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in recent weeks, disagreeing with him, for instance, that children in Gaza are not starving, and—like Starmer—pressuring for more food aid. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Tuesday, the President noted that First Lady Melania Trump has been gripped by the “terrible” images from Gaza, explaining, “She sees the same pictures that you see. And that we all see… [T]hose are kids that are starving. They are starving.”

European leaders, such as French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, are also signaling support for the recognition of Palestinian statehood.

Picture by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Tommy Robinson Leaves Britain After Railway Station Clash.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson left the United Kingdom following an altercation at St Pancras Station in London.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tommy Robinson, British Transport Police, and an unidentified man involved in the altercation.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Monday night at St Pancras Station, London; Robinson departed the country early Tuesday morning.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “He f*****g came at me, bruv.” – Tommy Robinson

🎯IMPACT: British Transport Police continues to investigate the incident, seeking to question Robinson.

IN FULL

Independent journalist and anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson has fled the United Kingdom after an altercation at St Pancras Station in London. The British Transport Police (BTP) confirmed that Robinson left the country on a flight early Tuesday morning following a reported assault on Monday night.

The BTP stated, “Following a report of an assault… officers have confirmed that the suspect, a 42-year-old man from Bedfordshire, boarded a flight out of the country in the early hours of this morning. Detectives are continuing to work closely to progress the investigation and bring him into custody for questioning.”

Social media footage shows Robinson pacing as a man lies face down on the ground. In the video, Robinson says, “He f*****g came at me, bruv,” while a bystander calls out, “Get someone here quick.” Robinson had reportedly been distributing flyers for a forthcoming free speech protest before the incident.

He has not commented directly on the situation, but has shared a post by an X (formerly Twitter) user stating, “If you cross a line and attack someone physically, or threaten to attack them physically, then you can’t expect any response other than a strong one,” and “A pre-emptive strike is totally legal.”

The repost adds: “To me it looks pretty clear. Tommy Robinson—controversial or not—was going about his business. Someone tried to attack him, and they came off worse.”

Robinson’s exit from Britain follows his release from prison in October. He had received a draconian 18-month sentence for contempt after defending allegations he made against a Syrian refugee, previously deemed libellous in a civil case. The activist has been the subject of a sustained lawfare campaign by the British state, being prosecuted—sometimes unsuccessfully—for such supposed crimes as making people uncomfortable simply by being present at a march against anti-Semitism, and questioning accused grooming gang members on their way to court.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Warns ‘You’re Not Going to Have Europe Anymore’ Due to Mass Migration.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump doubled down on his comments on European migration policies, warning that Europe may irrevocably change if current policies remain in place.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, British Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, and Scottish Secretary Ian Murray.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump arrived in Scotland on Friday evening for a four-day visit to his golf clubs in Aberdeen and Ayrshire.

💬KEY QUOTE: “They’ve got to get their act together. If they don’t, you’re not going to have Europe anymore, as you know it.” – President Donald J. Trump

🎯IMPACT: Trump’s remarks have reignited debates over immigration policies in Europe, with Nigel Farage’s Reform Party calling for the number of migrants to be slashed.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has doubled down on his comments Friday regarding Europe’s immigration policies, when he described the situation as a “horrible invasion.” Speaking to reporters on July 28, Trump remarked, “Europe is a much different place than it was just five years ago, 10 years ago. They’ve got to get their act together. If they don’t, you’re not going to have Europe anymore, as you know it,” he said on Monday.

Trump emphasized illegal immigration, saying, “You cannot let people come in here illegally. And what happens is, there’ll be murderers, there’ll be drug dealers, there’ll be all sorts of things that other countries don’t want, and they send them to you, [like] they send them to us, and you’ve got to stop them.” His comments come amid a surge in migrant boats crossing the English Channel, with more than 40,000 people having landed in Britain since Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party took power last July.

When questioned about Trump’s choice of words, particularly his use of the term “invasion” on Friday, Starmer’s Business Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, pushed back. “No, I wouldn’t [use the term]… I don’t know whether [Trump is] talking about other European countries there, or the wider context,” he said.

Net immigration to Britain in the year to December 2024 is currently estimated at 431,000, although provisional figures in recent years have all been revised upwards substantially. The total is down from the “Boriswave” peak of close to a million under former prime ministers Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, but still one of the highest figures in British history by hundreds of thousands.

 

Photo by Rasande Tyskar.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

London’s ‘Nasty’ Mayor Khan Clashes With Trump: ‘Diversity Makes Us Stronger.’

PULSE POINTS

âť“WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump is clashing with London Mayor Sadiq Khan on his trip to the United Kingdom, with Trump criticizing Khan’s performance as Mayor of London and Khan defending mass migration.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Sadiq Khan, and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The exchange took place on July 28, 2025, in the United Kingdom.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “I’m not a fan of your mayor… He’s a nasty person.” – President Trump

🎯IMPACT: The exchange extends President Trump’s yearslong feud with Khan, who has publicly denounced the America First leader as “racist, sexist, homophobic, and Islamophobic” and rooted for Hillary Clinton and his other election opponents.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump criticized London Mayor Sadiq Khan during a meeting with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer—a Labour Party colleague of Khan’s—describing him as a “nasty person” who has done “a terrible job” running the British capital. “I’m not a fan of your mayor,” Trump told the press, with Starmer laughing nervously and interjecting “He’s a friend of mine, actually” after the American leader remarked on Khan’s poor performance.

Unmoved by the Prime Minister’s intervention, Trump continued, “No, I think he’s done a terrible job,” while expressing willingness to visit London.

Khan, who has attacked Trump as “racist, sexist, homophobic, and Islamophobic” and accused him of “defending white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and anti-Semites” for close to a decade, responded via a spokesman, who said, “Sadiq is delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world. He’d see how our diversity makes us stronger not weaker; richer, not poorer.”

However, contrary to Khan’s claims, recent official statistics and studies suggest that mass migration is, overall, a significant net drain on Britain in general and London in particular. For instance, low-wage migrant workers—who comprise a majority of migrant workers—are estimated to drain the equivalent of nearly $200,000, net, by the time they reach retirement age, rising to over $650,000 each if they live to 80 and well over $1 million if they live to 100.

Notably, migrants who arrive on work visas are a minority of the migrants arriving in Britain annually, with a combination of jobless dependents, asylum seekers, and others who are an even larger drain on the public finances, making up the bulk of the yearly influx.

Many migrants are also a significantly greater threat to public safety than the British-born, too, with Afghans, for instance, being over 22 times more likely to be over 22 times more likely to be convicted of sex crimes.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Government Job Site Posts Ad for ‘Sharia Law Administrator.’

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A government job website in the United Kingdom advertised for an Islamic law administrator, sparking backlash.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Britain’s Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), Reform Party leader Nigel Farage.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The advertisement was posted on July 24 but taken down on July 28.

đź’¬KEY QUOTE: “Our country and its values are being destroyed.” — Nigel Farage

🎯IMPACT: The DWP claimed the advertisement was for a third party and not a government entity, but the backlash led to them taking it down just days after posting it.

IN FULL

A job advertisement for an administrative position at a Sharia court in Britain has sparked political backlash after being posted on the British government’s official jobs website. Listed on the Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP) Find a Job site, the $31,500-a-year role is based at Manchester Community Centre in Didsbury, England.

The position, advertised by an independent charity, requires applicants to hold a degree in Sharia law and have prior experience working within Islamic courts abroad. Duties include administrative and secretarial responsibilities for the Manchester Sharia Council and coordinating social and religious services.

Outrage quickly followed, with Reform Party leader Nigel Farage commenting, “Our country and its values are being destroyed.”

Zia Yusuf, who heads Reform’s British DOGE initiative, echoed the party leader, warning: “There is only one legal system in the UK. Any attempt to upend or replace it should be illegal.”

The uproar follows increasing scrutiny over the presence of Sharia courts across Britain. Reports indicate there are approximately 85 such bodies in the country, often handling religious rulings related to family matters, particularly Islamic divorces.

Usually comprised of male Islamic scholars, they offer “guidance” and decisions that hold significance for those married under Islamic law, particularly women seeking religious divorces, which often require Sharia court approval even if a civil divorce has been granted. Though many Muslim-majority countries have reformed elements of Sharia in family law, traditional interpretations still heavily influence rulings in these Britain-based councils.

The DWP, under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party, has tried to distance itself from the advertisement, insisting that “Find A Job is a free platform to help jobseekers find vacancies with employers from various sectors.”

Regardless, the listing was removed on July 28 amid public outrage.

Image by Don Sniegowski.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more