GET THE APP
Tuesday, November 11, 2025
28 minutes ago
Health

FDA to Remove ‘Black Box’ Warnings from Hormone Replacement Therapy.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the removal of “black box” warnings from over 20 hormone replacement therapy products used for menopause symptoms.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, and the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made Monday, with updates to drug labels now underway in the United States.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We are returning to evidence-based medicine and giving women control over their health again.” – Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

🎯IMPACT: Women seeking hormone replacement therapy will have more informed choices, with updated labels reflecting a nuanced understanding of risks and benefits.

IN FULL

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it would remove “black box” warnings from over 20 hormone replacement therapy (HRT) products used to treat menopause symptoms, such as hot flashes and bone loss. The warnings previously highlighted risks of cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, and probable dementia. They will remain on products with a risk of endometrial cancer for systemic estrogen-alone treatments.

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. emphasized the importance of the decision, stating, “Today, we are standing up for every woman who has symptoms of menopause and is looking to know her options and receive potentially life-changing treatment.” He criticized the outdated warnings as a result of “bad science and bureaucratic inertia” and praised the move as a return to evidence-based medicine.

The FDA’s decision followed an expert literature review conducted in July, which concluded that the risks of HRT had been overstated for women in their fifties. The agency also announced the approval of two new drugs, including a generic version of Premarin and a non-hormonal medication for treating menopausal symptoms.

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary noted that the warnings had deterred many women from seeking treatment. “Tragically, tens of millions of women have been denied the life-changing and long-term health benefits of hormone replacement therapy because of a medical dogma rooted in a distortion of risk,” he said.

The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists welcomed the updated labels, with its president, Dr. Steven J. Fleischman, stating, “The updated labels will better allow patients and clinicians to engage in a shared decision-making process, without an unnecessary barrier, when it comes to treatment of menopausal symptoms.” He also cautioned that systemic estrogen products still carry different risks compared to low-dose vaginal estrogen.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
58 minutes ago
Lawfare

State AG Probes JPMorgan Chase for Colluding With ‘Arctic Frost’ Witch Hunt.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) subpoenaed JPMorgan Chase (JPMC) for “any and all records of TMTG,” as part of an operation codenamed ‘Arctic Frost,’ prompting an investigation by Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (R).

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, JPMorgan Chase, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), and the Biden DOJ.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The investigation stems from events surrounding a TMTG merger in March 2024; the subpoena activity was recently revealed in Florida.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The timing of this activity and JPMC’s termination of its business relationships with TMTG raise obvious, troubling questions.” – James Uthmeier

🎯IMPACT: Florida’s attorney general has launched an investigation into potential violations of state laws, including anti-fraud and de-banking prohibitions.

IN FULL

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (R) is investigating JPMorgan Chase (JPMC) over its involvement with the former Biden government’s ‘Arctic Frost‘ scandal. This investigation follows revelations that the former Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) subpoenaed JPMC for “any and all records of TMTG,” [Trump Media & Technology Group] including records predating the company’s formation.

In a letter to JPMC, Uthmeier expressed “grave concerns” about the Biden government’s actions, which he described as targeting political adversaries. He highlighted that JPMC began questioning TMTG officials about past transactions shortly after the Biden DOJ’s subpoena, under the guise of “due diligence.” The letter also noted that JPMC subsequently terminated its banking relationship with TMTG immediately after the company closed a merger in March 2024.

Uthmeier remarked, “The timing of this activity and JPMC’s termination of its business relationships with TMTG raise obvious, troubling questions. This activity may implicate numerous Florida criminal and civil anti-fraud laws and de-banking prohibitions, as well as a breach of the basic, fundamental duties owed to your banking customers.”

The Florida attorney general has directed the Office of Statewide Prosecution and Enforcement Division to investigate the matter further. JPMC has been asked to preserve all records related to its interactions with TMTG. JPMC recently informed shareholders it is “responding to requests from government authorities and other external parties” about its policies and customer services, which appears to reference debanking concerns.

JPMC has previously supported an executive order signed by President Donald J. Trump, which called for regulators to investigate politicized or unlawful debanking practices by financial institutions.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
Footer Ad
Footer Ad
1 hour ago
Immigration
News

Anti-ICE Sexual Deviants Stage ‘Degenerates Against Fascism’ Protest.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A rally titled “Degenerates Against Fascism” took place outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Portland, Oregon, featuring partially nude participants, people in bondage gear, and others engaging in provocative displays.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Protesters, including known Antifa associates Alissa Azar and Michael “Michelle” Backes, and others in the rally.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Sunday, outside Portland’s ICE facility.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We are strong, we are proud, we are degenerates against fascism.” – Protest leader.

🎯IMPACT: Authorities deployed pepper balls to disperse agitators, with protesters mocking their efforts.

IN FULL

A protest dubbed “Degenerates Against Fascism” unfolded Sunday outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Portland, Oregon, drawing a crowd in fetish gear, “furry” costumes, and partial nudity to decry President Donald J. Trump‘s policies and federal immigration enforcement.

Participants marched through streets, chanting anti-Trump and anti-ICE slogans amid a spectacle of “kink-inspired” theatrics. One topless woman torched an American flag, kicked its ashes toward the federal facility, and brandished a sign reading, “tear gas makes me horny.” A group in dog masks, evoking the so-called “puppy play” subculture, howled in unison at federal personnel.

Elsewhere, a wheelchair user in a furry mask blew bubbles for a crawling protester in a pup hood. The throng roared, “No Trump, no ICE, no fascist USA,” with a leader proclaiming, “We are strong, we are proud, we are degenerates against fascism.”

Journalist Andy Ngo, who has covered Antifa for years, identified known Antifa figures Alissa Azar and Michael “Michelle” Backes among the demonstrators. As agitators surged toward the gates, authorities fired pepper balls to disperse them.

The rally follows months of turmoil at the ICE center, besieged nearly nightly by domestic terrorist Antifa militants since June, hurling threats, ramming barricades, and clashing violently with officers, yielding over 20 arrests, 100 citations, and 27 federal indictments for arson and assaults on officers.

Local Democrats have amplified the opposition. In September, Mayor Keith Wilson issued a violation notice citing over two dozen supposed breaches of a 2011 permit, based on detention exceedances tracked by progressive advocates. City Councilor Angelita Morillo, who uses they/them pronouns, posted a guide urging the use of “burner phones,” Signal encryption, Faraday bags, and PIN locks to frustrate law enforcement.

Early October saw brawls between Antifa and pro-ICE counter-demonstrators, including an unpunished attack on journalist Nick Sortor. Sortor was arrested for disorderly conduct but was released the next day amid allegations of bias.

President Donald J. Trump’s bid to deploy the National Guard to Portland to protect federal buildings and personnel has been blocked twice by U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, who ruled it exceeded federal authority and violated states’ rights.

Image via Andy Ngo.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
2 hours ago
News
UK

Doctor Let Off With a Warning for ‘Holohoax’ Jokes.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A British junior doctor received a formal warning after posting grossly offensive comments on social media, including jokes about Jews being gassed.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Dr. Martin Whyte, the General Medical Council (GMC), and the British Medical Association (BMA).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The offensive posts date back to 2018. Dr. Whyte is employed by Northumbria Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This conduct does not meet the standards required of a doctor. It risks bringing the profession into disrepute and must not be repeated.” – GMC Warning

🎯IMPACT: The warning will remain on Dr. Whyte’s record for two years, and he has been barred from representing the BMA in any capacity.

IN FULL

Dr. Martin Whyte, a British junior doctor and former executive member of the British Medical Association (BMA), has been formally warned by the General Medical Council (GMC) after making a series of grossly offensive social media posts, including jokes about Jews being gassed and comments questioning the Holocaust.

The GMC investigation described the posts as “grossly offensive” but said they “fell just short of that which would be considered serious enough to pose a risk to public protection.” Dr. Whyte, who currently works for Northumbria Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust as a specialist trainee in paediatrics, has received a formal warning that will remain on his record for two years. The notice states: “This conduct does not meet the standards required of a doctor. It risks bringing the profession into disrepute and must not be repeated.”

Among the posts reviewed by regulators were remarks referring to the “decomposing carcass of the Queen,” and a post describing Conservatives as “b******” and complaining that they should not be allowed to work in medicine. In one particularly shocking message following the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue massacre, which killed 11 people, Dr. Whyte wrote: “hahaha zeig hail hahaha gas the jews hahaha just kidding but have you seen these YouTube videos about the holohoax they’re pretty convincing imo [in my opinion].”

The BMA called Dr. Whyte’s comments “totally unacceptable” and confirmed that he had been removed from all association activities as soon as the material came to light. A spokesman said: “Dr. Whyte was immediately removed from any and all BMA business when the social media material came to light. This was followed by our own internal investigation, which made this permanent. The BMA stands opposed to all forms of discrimination.”

The Campaign Against Antisemitism criticised the GMC’s response, arguing that the warning was inadequate. A spokesman said, “Every week, there is some new outrage from the medical regulatory system. Is there any level of racism against Jewish people that the GMC would consider worthy of actual disciplinary action? Antisemitism is at record highs in our society and regulators are totally asleep at the wheel. Another spectacular failure by the medical regulator.”

In the United States, the Trump administration recently froze more than $500 million in federal grants to Brown University over anti-Semitism concerns, and rapper Kanye “Ye” West has apologised to a rabbi for his previous anti-Semitic remarks, blaming them on bipolar disorder.

Meanwhile, reports have highlighted Jewish families leaving supposedly “tolerant” countries like Canada for the United States due to fears over rising hostility.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
2 hours ago
News
UK

Far-Left UK Lawmaker Zarah Sultana Under Fire Over $1 Million Donations Standoff.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: British Labour Party Member of Parliament (MP) turned independent lawmaker Zarah Sultana is embroiled in a dispute over £800,000 (~$1.1 million) in donations to Your Party, which she co-founded with far-left former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zarah Sultana, Jeremy Corbyn, former Labour MP Beth Winter, former Labour mayor Jamie Driscoll, and former South African politician Andrew Feinstein.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The conflict has been ongoing since Your Party’s registration on September 30, 2025, in the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Zarah did not choose to become the sole director of MOU Operations Limited, but was prepared to take on this responsibility to ensure funds are transferred as quickly as possible.” – Spokesman for Zarah Sultana

🎯IMPACT: The internal dispute over funds has created a “low trust environment” and is affecting preparations for Your Party’s founding conference.

IN FULL

Zarah Sultana, a former Member of Parliament (MP) for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party who now sits in the House of Commons as an independent, is at the center of a controversy involving £800,000 (~$1.1 million) in donations for Your Party, a political group she co-founded with far-left former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Sultana currently manages these funds through a company, MOU Operations, following the resignation of its previous directors.

The funds, intended for Your Party—comprised chiefly of far-left Labour outcasts like Corbyn and pro-Gaza Muslim politicians dissatisfied with Starmer’s Middle East policy—have not been fully transferred, leading to tensions within the party. Sultana has agreed to transfer £600,000 (~$790,000) in three installments, starting with £200,000 (~$263,000), but party sources are demanding the entire amount be paid immediately.

The dispute follows the party’s registration with the Electoral Commission on September 30. Sultana stepped in as the sole director of MOU Operations after the previous directors, including former Labour MP Beth Winter, resigned, citing concerns about governance.

Sultana’s spokesman claims she is conducting “due diligence” before transferring the funds, which are also tied up with MOU’s costs and liabilities. However, some within Your Party accuse her of using the funds for political leverage.

The controversy has affected the party’s preparations for its founding conference, with organizers expressing frustration over limited resources.

Image by ReelNews.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
3 hours ago
William Upton
Politics

Supreme Court Upholds Same-Sex Marriage Precedent, For Now.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The United States Supreme Court has declined to take up a case that could have resulted in a potential challenge to same-sex marriage.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Supreme Court, former Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis, and her attorney Mat Staver.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Monday, November 10, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Like the abortion decision in Roe v. Wade, Obergefell was egregiously wrong from the start. We will continue to work to overturn Obergefell. It is not a matter of if, but when the Supreme Court will overturn Obergefell.” — Mat Staver

🎯IMPACT: While Staver remains confident that a challenge to overturn same-sex marriage will occur, the high court appears disinclined towards such a case.

IN FULL

The United States Supreme Court has declined to take up a case that could have resulted in a potential challenge to same-sex marriage. Notably, Democrat lawmakers—in their criticism of the high court—have consistently claimed the justices would not pass on the chance to overturn the Obergefell decision and effectively undo gay marriage.

On Monday, the court denied out of hand an appeal filed by former Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis, seeking to mitigate the hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and damages stemming from her refusal to issue same-sex marriage licenses. By rejecting the appeal request, the Supreme Court ended one of several avenues by which it could take up a challenge to Obergefell. 

Far-left activists and Democrat lawmakers have consistently held that Davis’s appeal would likely serve as the vehicle by which the Supreme Court majority would look to undo Obergefell, much like Roe v. Wade. The evidence pointed to was a short line in a concurring opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which Justice Clarence Thomas insinuated that same-sex marriage should also be revisited by the court. However, none of the other justices expressed a similar opinion nor suggested revisiting Obergefell was an aim.

Despite the setback, Mat Staver—founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, the legal group that represented Davis—expressed his confidence that the right case will come along that will result in the reversal of the federal requirement to allow same-sex marriage. “Like the abortion decision in Roe v. Wade, Obergefell was egregiously wrong from the start. We will continue to work to overturn Obergefell. It is not a matter of if, but when the Supreme Court will overturn Obergefell,” Staver said following the court’s decision not to take up Davis’s case.

Image by Photo Phiend.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
Footer Ad
Footer Ad
4 hours ago
Crime
News

Trump Admin Takes Out Two Narco-Terrorist Boats in the Pacific.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. military executed two lethal strikes on drug-smuggling vessels in the Pacific Ocean, killing six narco-terrorists.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, U.S. military forces, and six alleged narco-terrorists.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Strikes occurred on November 9 in the Eastern Pacific; announcement made Monday morning.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Yesterday, at the direction of President Trump, two lethal kinetic strikes were conducted on two vessels operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations.” – Pete Hegseth

🎯IMPACT: The operation marks the 18th lethal strike on drug-smuggling vessels in recent months, with approximately 75 individuals killed.

IN FULL

The U.S. military carried out two deadly strikes on November 9 against vessels in the eastern Pacific Ocean operated by narco-terrorist organizations. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced the operation Monday morning, saying the strikes were conducted under the direction of President Donald J. Trump.

“Yesterday, at the direction of President Trump, two lethal kinetic strikes were conducted on two vessels operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations,” Hegseth said in a statement. He added that U.S. intelligence linked the vessels to illicit narcotics trafficking.

According to Hegseth, both vessels were in international waters, each carrying three male narco-terrorists. All six were killed, and no U.S. forces were harmed. The Pentagon said the action marks the 18th lethal strike against drug-smuggling vessels in recent months, bringing the total number killed to roughly 75.

The Trump administration has sharply increased military action against Latin American drug cartels, with the President designating several as terrorist organizations and accusing Venezuela’s government of facilitating drug trafficking into the United States. “Under President Trump, we are protecting the homeland and killing these cartel terrorists who wish to harm our country and its people,” Hegseth said.

The two latest strikes follow a series of operations that have expanded U.S. military activity into the Pacific. In late October, 14 alleged narco-terrorists were killed in multiple strikes in the eastern Pacific, part of a growing campaign to target maritime smuggling routes. Earlier operations in October included attacks off the coast of Colombia, where U.S. forces struck boats linked to the ELN guerrilla group, and others targeting suspected cartel vessels operating beyond national waters.

Critics like the globalist United Nations have questioned the legality of the strikes, calling them extrajudicial killings that could violate international law. Senate Democrats have demanded to see the legal justifications behind the operations and for a list of organizations deemed targetable by the administration. The White House has defended the campaign, insisting that President Trump has a mandate from the American people to take strong action against cartels and that the operations are consistent with U.S. national security interests.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
4 hours ago
Politics

Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter Is Campaigning for Office.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Christine Pelosi announced her candidacy for the California State Senate.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Christine Pelosi, daughter of Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), and current State Senator Scott Wiener (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on Monday on X (formerly Twitter), regarding a California State Senate race.

💬KEY QUOTE: “In courtrooms, campaigns and corridors of power, I’ve fought to build Power For The People. And that’s why I’m running for California Senate.” – Christine Pelosi

🎯IMPACT: The Pelosis are seeking to perpetuate a political dynasty.

IN FULL

Christine Pelosi, the daughter of retiring Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), announced on Monday her intention to run for the California State Senate. The announcement was made via a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), marking her entry into the political race.

In the video, Christine Pelosi declared, “In courtrooms, campaigns and corridors of power, I’ve fought to build Power For The People. And that’s why I’m running for California Senate.”

The seat Pelosi is vying for is currently held by Scott Wiener (D), who has announced his candidacy to replace former Speaker Nancy Pelosi in the U.S. House of Representatives. Wiener, a far-left progressive who is an outspoken supporter of gender transitions for children and opponent of parents’ rights, likely headed off a potential direct challenge from the younger Pelosi by launching his campaign before the former Speaker’s retirement was announced.

A fight between Weiner, 54, and Christine Pelosi, 58, to succeed the latter’s mother would likely have pitted national Democrats against the California Democratic Party, where Weiner has built a robust base of support. The younger Pelosi, meanwhile, is a longtime party operative with deep ties to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), where she has served as Vice Chairman for Campaigns and Elections.

Weiner has been building a shadow campaign for several years in anticipation of Nancy Pelosi‘s retirement. In 2023, the progressive state senator announced he had amassed a $1 million war chest to fund his congressional run. The 84-year-old Pelosi’s decision to run for another term in office derailed Weiner’s plans at the time.

Image by Nancy Pelosi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
5 hours ago
Election Integrity

Supreme Court to Rule on Legality of Late Mail-In Ballots.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case concerning the legality of accepting mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The case, Watson v. Republican National Committee, challenges Mississippi’s mail-in ballot law, with arguments from state election officials and the Republican National Committee (RNC).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The case arises from Mississippi and will be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court following a reversal by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The election has then occurred, even if election officials do not receive all ballots by that day.” – State of Mississippi’s petition to the Supreme Court

🎯IMPACT: The court’s decision could set a national precedent on how mail-in ballots are handled and affect voting policies in several states.

IN FULL

The U.S. Supreme Court has announced it will hear Watson v. Republican National Committee, a case challenging Mississippi‘s law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted if they are received within five business days after Election Day, provided they were postmarked by Election Day.

Mississippi election officials argue that a vote is cast when a ballot is postmarked, regardless of when it is received. “The election has then occurred, even if election officials do not receive all ballots by that day,” the state said in its petition. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal law mandates elections occur on a single day, and allowing late-arriving ballots undermines this principle.

Sixteen states, along with Washington, D.C., Guam, and Puerto Rico, currently allow mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted even if they arrive after Election Day. This policy aims to accommodate voters affected by slow mail delivery. A federal judge initially upheld Mississippi’s law, but the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision.

Another case, Bost v. Illinois, is also under consideration by the court. It challenges Illinois‘ practice of counting ballots received up to two weeks after Election Day. Mississippi has requested that the court delay its ruling on Watson until the Illinois case is decided.

Additionally, the Supreme Court is hearing a challenge to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which could limit the scope of the landmark law.

Image by Billy Wilson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
5 hours ago
Economy

Trump Economy: New Data Shows Decrease in Prices, Increase in Wages.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: New data from DoorDash’s State of Local Commerce report highlights significant economic improvements, including lower inflation and rising wages.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump’s economic policies, DoorDash, and American consumers and businesses.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The data covers the past year, with an emphasis on trends from March to September across various U.S. cities.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Consumers are buying more from businesses in their communities.” – DoorDash Report

🎯IMPACT: Families are seeing lower prices on essentials, wage growth is outpacing costs, and fewer businesses are closing nationwide.

IN FULL

New data suggests the overall consumer economy continues to remain robust despite disruptions in some sectors over the last few months. The latest DoorDash State of Local Commerce report confirms that inflation has largely been brought under control and that consumer prices are beginning to recede from their highs under the former Biden government. Additionally, the report suggests that as prices fall, wages are also increasing, a positive sign for American workers, as it should lead to increased purchasing power.

The Breakfast Basics Index—which measures the price of three eggs, a glass of milk, a bagel, and an avocado—shows a decrease of 14 percent since March, and a 1.7 percent decline over the past 12 months. The Everyday Essentials Index—which measures home essentials like toothpaste, shampoo, toilet paper, laundry detergent, analgesic medication, and diapers—also shows a price decline over the last year.

According to the data, prices for other items, including cheese, cereals, fresh fruits, frozen meals, packaged meals, condiments, batteries, electronics, toys, and vitamins, have also fallen.

Importantly, the decline in prices comes hand in hand with a surge in national wage growth. This is especially notable when compared to restaurant prices, which have also decreased, making dining out once again increasingly affordable for American families.

The data also reveals that 56 percent of consumers report seeing fewer local businesses shutter over the last 12 months. DoorDash notes that the overall food spend has jumped by about five percent since last year—faster than prices have risen, suggesting “consumers are buying more from businesses in their communities.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
Footer Ad
Footer Ad