President-elect Donald J. Trump won the support of 43 percent of Eminem fans in the 2024 presidential election, against 39 percent for Vice President Kamala Harris—despite the rapper’s endorsement of the Democratic candidate and hard stance against Trump. Meanwhile, only two-thirds of Taylor Swift fans supported Harris, according to the data produced by J.L. Partners, while Trump managed to win over 29 percent of ‘Swifties’ despite her endorsement of the Democrat.
Similarly, Beyoncé’s endorsement of the Democratic presidential ticket only won over 53 percent of her fanbase, with 28 percent deciding to cast their ballot for Trump and J.D. Vance.
Fans of other popular music acts were more mixed in their support. The fanbases of Miley Cyrus and Justin Bieber tended towards Trump, with Cyrus’s fans supporting Trump by 43 percent to 39 percent for Harris. Bieber’s fans favored Trump by 42 percent to 41 percent.
The survey notes significant leads for Trump among fans of certain musicians, including Morgan Wallen, Kanye West, and DaBaby. Wallen’s fans favored Trump by a notable 43-point margin over Harris. The former President also led by 20 points among Kanye West fans and 17 points among DaBaby fans.
Harris found her most substantial support among Taylor Swift, Barbra Streisand, and Cher fans.
Regarding television preferences, Trump gained notable support from viewers of Selling Sunset and Young Sheldon. Harris was the favored candidate among fans of Love Island USA and The Bachelorette.
The National Pulse previously reported that Swift’s Instagram post endorsing Harris pushed over 300,000 individuals to a government voter registration website in its immediate aftermath.
President-elect Donald J. Trump won the support of 43 percent of Eminem fans in the 2024 presidential election, against 39 percent for Vice President Kamala Harris—despite the rapper's endorsement of the Democratic candidate and hard stance against Trump. Meanwhile, only two-thirds of Taylor Swift fans supported Harris, according to the data produced by J.L. Partners, while Trump managed to win over 29 percent of 'Swifties' despite her endorsement of the Democrat.
show more
The Democratic Party’s dark money lawfare guru, Marc Elias, fears being targeted by President-elect Donald J. Trump and Kash Patel, his nominee to lead the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In a recent column, Elias—who most recently pushed election denial claims by both Vice President Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign and now-defeated Senator Bob Casey Jr.—laments many of the media voices that have platformed him have gone silent following Trump’s landslide election victory.
“I understand it. I feel it. Like others, I fear the threat of government retribution, political vengeance, and an angry right-wing mob,” Elias says. He continues: “But I know that giving into it will only strengthen Trump and undermine the future of our democracy. Trump wants us to be scared. He wants us to give up—gradually and then suddenly.”
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Elias also noted that Kash Patel brands him as “the enemy of the Republican Party because he always finds a way to win…” However, Elias leaves out that Patel—speaking with Stephen K. Bannon on War Room, argued the real victory would be convincing Elias to switch sides because of his expertise in lawfare.
The National Pulse has reported extensively on Elias’s activities. In August, the lawfare guru was added to the Harris campaign’s vast legal team to challenge state election laws and tilt the rules in their favor. Additionally, Elias—who was a participant in the Russia collusion hoax—is working to carve out a new avenue for backing candidates through dark money-funded websites presenting as media outlets. Elias’s law firm is representing a liberal political website that claims to be a legitimate news outlet despite its primary content and activities more closely resembling a Super PAC.
show less
The Democratic Party's dark money lawfare guru, Marc Elias, fears being targeted by President-elect Donald J. Trump and Kash Patel, his nominee to lead the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In a recent column, Elias—who most recently pushed election denial claims by both Vice President Kamala Harris's 2024 presidential campaign and now-defeated Senator Bob Casey Jr.—laments many of the media voices that have platformed him have gone silent following Trump's landslide election victory.
show more
Governor Tim Walz (D-MN), the 2024 Democratic Party’s vice presidential nominee, says he is surprised American voters did not embrace Kamala Harris’s disjointed and campy presidential campaign. Walz’s remarks came in his first interview since President-elect Donald J. Trump’s landslide election victory in November.
“It felt like at the rallies, at the things I was going to, the shops I was going in, that the momentum was going our way, and it obviously wasn’t at the end,” Governor Walz told Minnesota’s KSTP-TV. He continued: “So yeah, I was a little surprised. I thought we had a positive message, and I thought the country was ready for that.”
Speaking with another local Minnesota outlet, Walz added: “To have Donald Trump seen as a champion of the middle class, I fully don’t see how that would happen, but I recognize that’s where people voted.” The Minnesota Democrat demurred when asked if there were any specific things he would have changed about the campaign, instead insisting he did the best he could.
LIES & EMBELLISHMENTS.
Walz’s long history of lies and embellishments regarding his military and political career came to light shortly after being tapped as Kamala Harris’s running mate. The National Pulse extensively covered the allegations against Walz by former colleagues and comrades in the Minnesota National Guard.
During the campaign, veterans who served with Walz accused him of being a “habitual liar,” a “coward,” and a “deserter.” Additionally, the Democratic Party vice presidential nominee drew online ridicule for his bizarre and campy behavior at campaign rallies, often waving his hands over-enthusiastically in a clownish manner. In an especially embarrassing moment, many of Walz’s relatives endorsed Donald Trump for president.
These missteps resulted in a last-minute shake-up of Walz’s campaign staff, with more experienced and professional aides brought on to tone down his behavior. However, none of these aides evidently informed Walz that the campaign never led Trump in any of their internal polls.
Governor Tim Walz (D-MN), the 2024 Democratic Party's vice presidential nominee, says he is surprised American voters did not embrace Kamala Harris's disjointed and campy presidential campaign. Walz's remarks came in his first interview since President-elect Donald J. Trump's landslide election victory in November.
show more
Jared Isaacman, the nominee to serve as administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), has a concerning history of being a significant donor to Democratic Party candidates, as well as Democrat-aligned SuperPACs and campaign committees. Additionally, two companies founded by Isaacman heavily promote diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives (DEI) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) programs—both of which push a radical progressive political agenda.
Technology and space exploration billionaire Elon Musk is likely pushing for Isaacman’s nomination. Isaacman served as the commander of Musk’s SpaceX’s Inspiration4 private space flight mission, as well as its Polaris Dawn mission launched in 2024. He was the first private citizen to perform an EVA spacewalk.
DEMOCRAT DONOR.
Since 2010, Isaacman has given nearly $300,000 to candidates and political committees—with almost all of the money going to Democratic Party entities and lawmakers. According to Federal Election Commission (FEC) data, Isaacman—during the 2024 election cycle—gave $3,300 to Senate Jon Tester’s (D-MT) failed election bid. Meanwhile, he contributed $6,600 to Representative Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), who narrowly defeated former Congressman Mike Rogers (R-MI) for Michigan’s open Senate seat.
Additionally, the technology entrepreneur invested heavily in Democratic Party efforts in Pennsylvania—giving the state party $10,000 in July of this year, contributing $3,3000 directly to Senator Bob Casey Jr. (D-PA), and giving another $15,400 to Casey’s joint fundraising committee. Casey would go on to lose re-election to his Republican challenger, Dave McCormick.
The NASA administrator nominee was also active on behalf of Democrats during the 2022 mid-term election cycle. Isaacman contributed nearly $60,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC). Additionally, he gave $100,000 to the Senate Majority PAC controlled by Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY). Notably, Schumer himself also received $5,800 from Isaacman.
Other Democrats receiving contributions include $2,900.00 for Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ), $5,800 for Rep. Susan Wild (D-PA), $2,900 for Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), $2,900 for Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), and $2,900 for both Sens. Tester and Casey.
Between 2010 and 2016, Isaacman gave less than $10,000 to Republican candidates.
DEI AND ESG PROMOTOR.
In addition to his significant support for Democratic politicians, Isaacman founded companies Shift4 Payments (a payment processing firm) and Draken International (an aerospace and defense contractor), which are major promoters of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) programs. Shift4 Payments provides investors with an ESG factsheet that touts the company’s net-zero water usage, net-zero carbon emissions, and its use of renewable energy.
In addition, the Shift4 Payments investor fact sheet notes the company’s commitment to DEI. It states that 35 percent of the company’s workforce is female, while 41 percent is black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC). Shift4 Payments also maintains two DEI workforce networks: ‘Women @ Shift4’ and ‘Pride @ Shift4.’
Meanwhile, Draken International similarly promotes a DEI agenda in the workplace. The company sponsored the 2024 Inclusivity in Aviation Reception, which was hosted at the Houses of Parliament in the United Kingdom. Draken announced its sponsorship in a LinkedIn post: “We were thrilled to sponsor this event once again, following the inaugural ‘Women in Aviation’ event in 2022. We did so not because we consider Draken as a paragon of virtue when it comes to inclusivity. Quite the opposite. Like our fellow sponsors Lockheed Martin, we are on a path—and that path will see companies such as ours broaden the appeal of a career in aviation to sectors of society that, to date, have been excluded.”
WHITE GUYS IN SPACE.
Perhaps the most concerning aspect of Isaacman’s background is his comments regarding the need for greater diversity in space exploration. Before the Inspiration4 mission in 2021, Isaacman, speaking with the Unleash Your Greatness Within podcast host TJ Hoisington, lamented that private space flight is dominated by “rich white guys.”
“I did not want four rich white guys that are going up into space,” Isaacman told Hoisington, stressing the importance of having a diverse mission crew for Inspiration4.
Isaacman repeated a similar line during a 2021 interview with the New York Times, stating he deliberately set up the selection of the passengers on the Inspiration4 mission to ensure diversity. “Is it going to represent all of the people of Earth and not just rich white guys?” he told the NYT at the time.
Jared Isaacman, the nominee to serve as administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), has a concerning history of being a significant donor to Democratic Party candidates, as well as Democrat-aligned SuperPACs and campaign committees. Additionally, two companies founded by Isaacman heavily promote diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives (DEI) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) programs—both of which push a radical progressive political agenda.
show more
Exit polls show that one of the Democrats’ strongest demographics over the last three presidential elections has been unmarried women. While Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris all carried women overall in 2016, 2020, and 2024, they did not carry all categories of women—married women broke for President-elect Donald J. Trump by five points in November, up from a four-point advantage in 2020 and a two-point deficit in 2016.
However, without the influence of a husband, women have broken decisively for Democratic candidates. Vice President Harris did not carry unmarried women as strongly as Clinton, at +31 points, or Biden, at +31 points, but her lead was still decisive, at +23 points, according to RealClearPolling.
Single status also seems to have a political impact on men, but it is less pronounced: bachelors were tied in the Trump-Harris election contest, breaking for Biden by seven points in 2020 and for Clinton by just two points in 2016. Meanwhile, married men broke for Trump by 22 points in 2024, 11 points in 2020, and 19 points in 2016.
Overall, men broke for Trump by 12 points, and women broke for Harris by eight points this past election, for a “gender gap” of 20 points.
CHILDLESS CAT LADIES.
In 2021, President-elect Trump’s future running mate, Senator J.D. Vance, warned of the impact of childless singletons on American politics, saying, “We’re effectively run in this country, via the Democrats, be it via our corporate oligarchs, by a bunch of childless cat ladies, who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too… You look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, [Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]—the entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children.”
Notably, Vice President Harris suggested in a sex-focused podcast in October that she did not have children of her own because she did not want to be “humble.”
Vance defended the comments on the 2024 campaign trail, telling Megyn Kelly: “The substance of what I said, Megyn. This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming anti-family and anti-children. The simple point that I made is that having children, becoming a father, becoming a mother, I really do think it changes your perspective in a pretty profound way.”
The stark difference in the voting habits of married and unmarried women strongly suggests Vice President-elect Vance is correct.
Exit polls show that one of the Democrats' strongest demographics over the last three presidential elections has been unmarried women. While Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris all carried women overall in 2016, 2020, and 2024, they did not carry all categories of women—married women broke for President-elect Donald J. Trump by five points in November, up from a four-point advantage in 2020 and a two-point deficit in 2016.
show more
Former State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus is believed to be attempting to wriggle her way back into President-elect Donald J. Trump’s next administration in January. While Ortagus held a communications role at the top U.S. diplomatic agency from 2019 until 2021 under Trump, colleagues at State and other departments viewed her as less than aligned with Trump’s America First foreign policy.
FAILED CONGRESSIONAL BID.
Following the 2020 election, Ortagus’s true colors were revealed, especially after she was blocked in 2022 from running for Congress in Tennessee after the state legislature passed a law requiring candidates to live in the district they wish to represent. She was largely backed by the Republican Party establishment, with fundraisers hosted by a who’s who of anti-Trump donors.
Having failed to even make the ballot in the Tennessee congressional race, Ortagus—who previously served within the entrenched, neoconservative foreign policy establishment at USAID and the Treasury Department under both President George W. Bush and Barack Obama—ramped up her appearances on corporate media, especially Fox News, where she routinely attacked Trump.
ANTI-AMERICA FIRST.
In May of 2023, just as the Republican presidential primary was kicking off in earnest, Ortagus slammed Trump’s major foreign policy speech. During an appearance on Fox Business, she told host Charles Payne that she hadn’t “drank the juice yet.” Orgatus smeared the now President-elect, stating: “Where I fundamentally disagree with [Trump’s] foreign policy, where I think it is very Rand Paul-esque, is the seeds of isolationism. In his gut, he does not think that America should be a ‘policeman of the world.'”
Despite Orgatus’s insistence that Trump’s America First foreign policy views are ‘isolationist,’ the American people have resoundingly agreed with Trump—sending him back to the White House with a landslide 2024 election victory.
BACKED POMPEO, PENCE, & HALEY.
Even more concerning is Ortagus’s decision to back several of Trump’s opponents during the 2024 Republican presidential primary. The former State Department spokeswoman was an early backer of her former boss and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo as he considered a presidential run. Notably, Pompeo legitimized the Biden Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawfare campaign against Trump when the President-elect was indicted by special counsel Jack Smith for allegedly mishandling classified documents.
However, after Pompeo abandoned his nascent presidential bid, Ortagus would go on to back the likes of neoconservatives Mike Pence and Nikki Haley against President Trump.
ORIGINAL NEVER TRUMPER.
While Orgatus’s most recent anti-Trump statements and actions are concerning to many inside the Trump transition, her comments in 2016 are as equally troubling. Ortagus falsely claimed that Trump made fun of disabled people and likened his temperament to a “middle school pubescent boy.” She also described the future President as “disgusting.”
Concerns are also being raised regarding Ortagus’s relationship with Samantha Vinograd, an aggressive anti-Trump activist and political operative. Vinograd has routinely compared Trump to Hitler, accused him of espousing “white nationalist” talking points, and perpetuated the Democrat-pushed Russa collusion hoax.
DEEP STATE FLUNKEY.
Even during her short tenure in the first Trump administration, Ortagus was viewed as being too aligned with Deep State actors, especially employees at the State Department. In one incident, Ortagus and others in then-Secretary of State Pompeo’s inner circle allowed anti-Trump employees to express their opposition to the President of the United States on their personal social media accounts—something that in any other administration would be considered taboo at the least.
Another point of contention is Ortagus’s consulting firm, Polaris National Security, which is widely believed to be backed by anti-Trump, Deep State billionaire Paul Singer. In 2016, it was Singer who is suspected—at least in part—of funding the debunked Steele Dossier, which helped kick off the Democratic Party’s Russia collusion hoax attacks against Trump.
In the final days of the first Trump administration, Ortagus’s mercenary, pro-Deep State attitude may have gotten the best of her. The former State Department spokeswoman pledged to support the Biden government in an email to staff that was viewed by many as an attempt to retain her job after the 2020 election.
show less
Former State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus is believed to be attempting to wriggle her way back into President-elect Donald J. Trump's next administration in January. While Ortagus held a communications role at the top U.S. diplomatic agency from 2019 until 2021 under Trump, colleagues at State and other departments viewed her as less than aligned with Trump's America First foreign policy.
show more
Nearly a dozenindividualsselected for cabinetpositions and key roles within President-elect Donald J. Trump’s incoming administration received threats on Tuesday evening. The threats, described as “violent” and “unAmerican,” included bomb threats and ‘swatting’ incidents, according to a statement from the Trump-Vance transition team.
Karoline Leavitt—the transition team’s spokeswoman and the incoming White House press secretary—confirmed the incidents, noting that law enforcement agencies acted promptly to safeguard those targeted. “Last night and this morning, several of President Trump’s Cabinet nominees and administration appointees were targeted in violent threats to their lives and those who live with them. In response, law enforcement acted quickly to ensure the safety of those who were targeted,” Leavitt said.
Local law enforcement visited the residences of some of the nominees and appointees as part of their response strategy. A bomb squad was dispatched to the residence of former Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-FL) after he received a pipebomb threat. Gaetz had been nominated for U.S. Attorney General but withdrew his name from consideration last week.
These threats emerge in the wake of two assassination attempts on Trump earlier this year. In July, during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, Trump was shot at, sustaining a wound to his right ear. The assailant, Thomas Matthew Crooks, was killed during the incident.
In another incident in September, a man was apprehended with a Soviet-style rifle at Trump International Golf Course in West Palm Beach, Florida. The alleged would-be-assassin, Ryan Wesley Routh, had positioned the firearm through a fence, aiming at Trump, who was swiftly moved to safety by the Secret Service.
Leavitt stated that the transition team remains committed to its tasks despite attempts at intimidation. “With President Trump as our example, dangerous acts of intimidation and violence will not deter us,” she asserted.
show less
Nearly a dozenindividualsselected for cabinetpositions and key roles within President-elect Donald J. Trump's incoming administration received threats on Tuesday evening. The threats, described as "violent" and "unAmerican," included bomb threats and 'swatting' incidents, according to a statement from the Trump-Vance transition team.
show more
MSNBC’s viewership continues to plummet following President-elect Donald J. Trump’s landslide victory in the 2024 presidential election. According to data from Nielsen, the network has now seen nearly 50 percent of its audience tune out. Even more concerning for the left-wing corporate news channel is that its audience among the advertiser-coveted 25-54 age demographic has entirely collapsed, standing at just 63,000 viewers.
In comparison, Fox News strengthened its position as the leading cable news network, reporting growth during the same period. While MSNBC attracted 644,000 viewers during primetime, Fox News’s viewership soared to 3.2 million, marking an 86 percent increase from the previous year. In the 25-54 demographic, Fox recorded a 147 percent rise, resulting in an average of 476,000 viewers.
MSNBC’s challenges extended to total-day ratings, where the network garnered 497,000 viewers and just 49,000 in the key demographic. This reflects ongoing issues for programming like Morning Joe, which experienced a 37 percent decline in viewership after co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski met with President-elect Trump.
Several of MSNBC’s major programs, including The ReidOut and 11th Hour with Stephanie Ruhle, have reached low points in their viewership, particularly in the 25-54 category. In comparison, Fox News captured 62 percent of the cable news audience for total-day ratings throughout November.
CNN also experienced a decline, losing 33 percent of its audience; however, MSNBC’s downturn was more pronounced. MSNBC reported only 14 broadcasts exceeding two million viewers for the month, significantly lower than Fox News’s 248 telecasts reaching the same threshold.
Notably, billionaire technology and space exploration mogul Elon Musk has expressed interest in buying the failing MSNBC network from its parent company, Comcast. The National Pulse reported late last week that Musk indicated in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that he was seriously considering the move.
show less
MSNBC's viewership continues to plummet following President-elect Donald J. Trump's landslide victory in the 2024 presidential election. According to data from Nielsen, the network has now seen nearly 50 percent of its audience tune out. Even more concerning for the left-wing corporate news channel is that its audience among the advertiser-coveted 25-54 age demographic has entirely collapsed, standing at just 63,000 viewers.
show more
For the third straight election cycle, public opinion polling once again underestimated support for President-elect Donald J. Trump, resulting in a significant polling error. The left-wing Guardian newspaper, based in the United Kingdom, saw their U.S. national polling average err by three points with 99 percent of the vote in the presidential election counted. This error is fairly consistent with the polling misrepresentation of Trump in the past two presidential election cycles.
The Guardian‘s polling average appears to have been thrown off by the inclusion of several polls viewed as outliers by other websites that aggregate public polling. According to their aggregate, the polls predicted a slim lead for Kamala Harris, with 48 percent of the vote to Trump’s 47 percent. However, as the election results stand now, Trump has won a majority of the popular vote at 50 percent, with Harris coming in at 48 percent.
Regarding key swing states, the polling inaccuracies varied. In states such as Georgia, polls aligned closely with results, whereas in places like Arizona, a discrepancy of four percentage points was noted. Interestingly, when looking at individual pollsters regarding the national popular vote, Richard Baris and Big Data Poll were the most accurate pollster of the cycle. They saw only a 0.1 percent error from the final popular vote results. The Wall Street Journal‘s error was only 0.4 percent, while AtlasIntel—the most accurate pollster of the 2020 cycle—was only off by 0.5 percent. The New York Times/Siena poll’s miss was just 0.6 percent, and Rassmussen Reports was off by just. 0.8 percent.
Conversely, pollsters like Marist, Morning Consult, and Quinnipiac saw significant polling errors, and their inclusion in some aggregates likely resulted in the third straight miss on support for President-elect Trump.
For the third straight election cycle, public opinion polling once again underestimated support for President-elect Donald J. Trump, resulting in a significant polling error. The left-wing Guardian newspaper, based in the United Kingdom, saw their U.S. national polling average err by three points with 99 percent of the vote in the presidential election counted. This error is fairly consistent with the polling misrepresentation of Trump in the past two presidential election cycles.
show more
Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is calling Vice President Kamala Harris’s decision to embrace the backing of former Republican Vice President Dick Cheney—reviled as the architect of the 2003 Iraq War—and his daughter, former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), a significant error. Omar, a member of the progressive Congressional faction known as “The Squad,” said Harris’s late attempt to win over Republicans was “a huge misstep.”
The Somali-born Congresswoman contends that by openly campaigning with the Cheneys, Harris and her running mate, Governor Tim Walz (D-MN), only further alienated the pro-Palestinian Uncommitted Movement. This, Omar says, likely cost the 2024 Democratic Party presidential nominee the state of Michigan—where the Uncommitted Movement held considerable influence.
The Uncommitted Movement chose to withhold its backing from Harris due to dissatisfaction with the Biden-Harris government’s approach to the Gaza conflict. Michigan’s substantial Arab and Muslim communities voiced concerns over the perceived lack of accountability placed on Israel for the ongoing violence and destruction in Gaza. Omar highlighted Cheney’s name as being “synonymous with war” for younger generations, suggesting it misrepresented the campaign’s priorities.
As part of their efforts to appeal to disenchanted Republican voters, the Harris-Walz campaign prominently featured Liz Cheney’s endorsement, even organizing an event in Wisconsin with Cheney and Harris. However, Omar critiqued the campaign’s performance in Dearborn, Michigan, an area with a significant Arab population, noting Harris and Walz’s preference to send staff instead of visiting personally. She emphasized that the personal engagement demonstrated by President-elect Donald J. Trump, who met with Dearborn‘s Democratic mayor, influenced the outcome there.
While Omar maintains a critical stance toward Trump, she expressed a willingness to work with the new administration, albeit with a commitment to resist any policies she perceives as detrimental to her constituents.
show less
Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is calling Vice President Kamala Harris's decision to embrace the backing of former Republican Vice President Dick Cheney—reviled as the architect of the 2003 Iraq War—and his daughter, former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), a significant error. Omar, a member of the progressive Congressional faction known as "The Squad," said Harris's late attempt to win over Republicans was "a huge misstep."
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
