Monday, September 8, 2025

FCC Commissioner Says Facebook is Censoring Factually Accurate Critiques of Kamala Harris.

U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Brendan Carr is criticizing Facebook, owned by Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta conglomerate, for censoring factually accurate content critical of the Biden-Harris regime. Carr took to X (formerly Twitter) to expose a case where Facebook flagged a post that accurately pointed out the failure of a Harris-led rural broadband expansion initiative, labeling it as “false information” despite the post being truthful.

The censored post highlighted that the Biden-Harris government promised to spend $42 billion to expand Internet coverage across the U.S., yet to date, no households or businesses have actually been connected under the plan. According to Carr, the post was flagged by one of Facebook’s so-called “fact-checkers,” who are often criticized for biased assessments. While the post wasn’t removed outright, Facebook’s algorithms significantly reduced its visibility, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitting that flagged posts receive 95 percent fewer clicks and up to 47 percent fewer shares.

Carr noted the irony of the “fact-checkers” citing officials from the very government being criticized to issue their “false information” rating. He stressed that the censorship is taking place despite the fact that “Zuckerberg promised Congress that it had stopped censoring posts at the behest of the Biden-Harris Administration.”

Carr has long accused Big Tech of political and ideological bias, asserting that platforms like Meta and Google are “building in” bias into their algorithms, which control everything from search results to artificial intelligence (AI) outputs. He has called this trend a significant threat to freedom of expression and an “existential crisis for democracy.”

show less
U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Brendan Carr is criticizing Facebook, owned by Mark Zuckerberg's Meta conglomerate, for censoring factually accurate content critical of the Biden-Harris regime. Carr took to X (formerly Twitter) to expose a case where Facebook flagged a post that accurately pointed out the failure of a Harris-led rural broadband expansion initiative, labeling it as “false information” despite the post being truthful. show more
musk

Elon Musk’s Firms Face Massive Lawfare by The Biden-Harris Govt.

The companies owned and run by tech billionaire Elon Musk face investigations or regulatory battles from nearly every facet of the Biden-Harris regime in what appears tantamount to a massive lawfare campaign. Federal agencies controlled by the Biden-Harris White House—including Labor, Transportation, Justice, Interior, and Agriculture—all have either federal investigations or regulatory issues with X (formerly Twitter), SpaceX, Tesla, or Neuralink.

Besides cabinet-level departments, several other federal agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), are also engaged in battles against Musk and his companies.

The investigations include probes into the safety of Tesla vehicles, while others concern issues like the environmental impact of SpaceX rockets. Musk stated on X that if the FCC had not revoked a grant awarded to SpaceX, North Carolina would have had over 19,000 Starlink kits, which Musk argues could have saved lives following Hurricane Helene.

After announcing his support for former President Donald J. Trump’s campaign, Musk has stated that he expects to be imprisoned by the federal government should Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris win in November.

“If he loses, I’m f****d,” Musk told Tucker Carlson earlier this month. “How long do you think my prison sentence is going to be? Will I see my children? I don’t know.”

Musk, who is projected to be the world’s first trillionaire, has also been criticized by several foreign governments in recent months.

The European Union (EU) has threatened him over alleged “hate speech” and misinformation on X. At the same time, Brazil’s Supreme Court temporarily banned X from the country over similar allegations, forcing the company to pay a $5 million fine.

show less
The companies owned and run by tech billionaire Elon Musk face investigations or regulatory battles from nearly every facet of the Biden-Harris regime in what appears tantamount to a massive lawfare campaign. Federal agencies controlled by the Biden-Harris White House—including Labor, Transportation, Justice, Interior, and Agriculture—all have either federal investigations or regulatory issues with X (formerly Twitter), SpaceX, Tesla, or Neuralink. show more

WATCH: Zuckerberg Engineer Admits Shadowbanning Kamala’s Critics.

A senior engineer at Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, has revealed it has an “Integrity Team” targeting social media posts critical of Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the U.S. presidential election. In hidden camera footage shot by an undercover journalist, Meta Senior Software Engineer Jeevan Gyawali discloses, “Say your uncle in Ohio said something about Kamala Harris is unfit to be a president because she doesn’t have a child, that kind of s**t is automatically demoted.”

Gyawali confirms that users posting such content are told their content is being suppressed, a method of cutting engagement and reach known as “shadowbanning.”

Gyawali explains that Meta’s Integrity Team uses “civic classifiers” to control content. He also reveals the existence of a so-called Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team, created to monitor and address the platform, which has been active since April.

When asked about Meta’s influence over election outcomes, Gyawali confirms that the company has the ability to sway political results and that its moderation decisions favor the Democratic Party. He adds that Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, supports the platform’s role in shaping political discourse and outcomes “100 percent.”

WATCH:

show less
A senior engineer at Mark Zuckerberg's Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, has revealed it has an "Integrity Team" targeting social media posts critical of Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the U.S. presidential election. In hidden camera footage shot by an undercover journalist, Meta Senior Software Engineer Jeevan Gyawali discloses, "Say your uncle in Ohio said something about Kamala Harris is unfit to be a president because she doesn't have a child, that kind of s**t is automatically demoted." show more

‘Spice Girl’ Campaigns for Bizarre New Emoji.

Melanie ‘Mel B’ Brown, a former Spice Girls member, is advocating for the introduction of Afro-hair emojis on digital devices worldwide. The call comes from a campaign led by Rise 365, a youth-driven organization, which complains that out of nearly 4,000 existing emojis, none depict hairstyles commonly worn by black or mixed-race individuals. The group is urging the Unicode Consortium, the entity responsible for deciding emoji distribution globally, to expand its range of symbols.

On social media, Bown is encouraging the public to search for “Afro Hair” online to raise awareness for the campaign. “The proposed emojis we’re hoping to get on our phones soon: Afro, Locs, Waves & Braids,” she explained, adding: “You can help by searching ‘Afro Hair’ on Google as manyyyyyy times as possible before [the] end of the month so we can bring change to our phones.”

The initiative coincides with Black History Month in the United Kingdom.

Joyclen Brodie-Mends Buffong, founder of Rise 365, claims Afro-hair emojis are required to address so-called “texturism,” which refers to prejudice against kinkier, tightly curled hair. The campaign seeks to initiate broader discussions about alleged Afro-hair discrimination and catalyze change, starting with emojis.

The Unicode Consortium had recently announced the addition of new emojis, such as a tired face and a leafless tree, but none included Afro hair. Designs for four new Afro hair emojis, created by Rise 365, are set to be submitted for consideration in April.

Image by Eva Rinaldi.

show less
Melanie 'Mel B' Brown, a former Spice Girls member, is advocating for the introduction of Afro-hair emojis on digital devices worldwide. The call comes from a campaign led by Rise 365, a youth-driven organization, which complains that out of nearly 4,000 existing emojis, none depict hairstyles commonly worn by black or mixed-race individuals. The group is urging the Unicode Consortium, the entity responsible for deciding emoji distribution globally, to expand its range of symbols. show more

Zuckerberg Hires RINO Republican to Help Mend his Right Wing PR Problem.

Tech billionaire Mark Zuckerberg—chairman and CEO of Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram—is taking on the services of establishment Republican money man Brian Baker to help smooth relations with GOP lawmakers and center-right think tankers in Washington, D.C. Baker is no stranger to the Facebook co-founder and billionaire, having helped Zuckerberg’s so-called “election infrastructure” efforts during the 2022 midterm elections.

Baker has a long history in Republican establishment politics in Washington, D.C., serving as the political money man for the billionaire Ricketts family out of Nebraska for over a decade. Former Nebraska Governor Pete Ricketts (R) currently sits in the U.S. Senate as one of the state’s two Republican senators. The family also owns the Chicago Cubs professional baseball franchise.

Additionally, Baker—a Chicago, Illinois native—heads Ending Spending, Inc., a nonprofit group that engages in electioneering. In 2017, Ending Spending, Inc. paid Baker $3 million.

The GOP establishment money man is a fixture—alongside lobbyists for companies like Apple, Comcast, and Microsoft—at political fundraisers around the nation’s capital, with many center-right think tanks and candidates hoping to gain access to the Ricketts family wealth. His longstanding ties on Capitol Hill and history as a conduit for wealthy GOP donor money will undoubtedly make Baker an effective force of influence for Zuckerberg and Meta.

Prior to the 2016 election, Baker was a staunch opponent of Donald J. Trump. Though following the America First leader’s Republican primary victory, Baker eventually formed a SuperPAC focused on funding anti-Hillary Clinton campaign advertisements.

ZUCKBUCKS & ELECTION INTERFERENCE. 

Zuckerberg’s relationship with America’s political right has deteriorated drastically since the 2020 presidential election. The Meta CEO has been accused by many on the right of using his vast wealth and companies to interfere in American elections.

He admitted that his social media platform, Facebook, was pressured by the Biden-Harris government to censor Americans who posted about the COVID-19 pandemic on his website. Additionally, the tech billionaire acknowledges that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had warned them about potential Russian disinformation regarding Burisma and the Biden family, which directly resulted in the New York Post‘s Hunter Biden laptop story being suppressed on Facebook.

Meanwhile, the Facebook founder’s Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) pours vast sums of ‘Zuckerbucks’ into what are supposed to be improved voter access initiatives, such as new absentee ballot drop boxes. However, the schemes overwhelmingly benefit Democratic-leaning areas, with election integrity groups arguing they grant leftists greater voting access than conservatives and are, therefore, unlawful.

 

show less
Tech billionaire Mark Zuckerberg—chairman and CEO of Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram—is taking on the services of establishment Republican money man Brian Baker to help smooth relations with GOP lawmakers and center-right think tankers in Washington, D.C. Baker is no stranger to the Facebook co-founder and billionaire, having helped Zuckerberg's so-called "election infrastructure" efforts during the 2022 midterm elections. show more

TikTok Banned Political Ads, But is Allowing This Infamous Left-Wing Group to Continue.

Despite explicitly banning political advertisements on their platform since 2019, the Chinese-owned media giant TikTok still shows alleged paid political ads, including several linked to Democrat activist groups. Recent findings indicate that this prohibition has not entirely prevented the circulation of paid political messages.

At least 52 videos labeled with “Paid Partnership,” #ad, or #sponsored, some receiving significant views, have appeared to contravene TikTok’s policy. Some videos appear to be sponsored by the Democratic activist groups ActBlue, TogetherSF Action, and NextGen America. These videos promote issues like climate change and voter registration.

TikTok has reiterated its stance against political ads, stating that it disallows political content through all monetization channels, including paid advertisements, branded political content, and other promotional avenues. TikTok claims it adheres to a stringent no-political-ads policy, unlike other tech giants such as Facebook, Instagram, X, and Google.

Owned by ByteDance, a Chinese company linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), TikTok faces additional scrutiny over national security concerns. U.S. lawmakers have been particularly vigilant due to worries about potential foreign influence via the platform, which is currently contesting a possible ban in court unless sold to a U.S.-approved entity.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) noted the absence of specific regulations regarding social media influencer activities.

According to the Pew Research Center, TikTok has become a key news source for young American adults. The Center notes that 39 percent of adults aged 18 to 29 use the platform for news. While the BidenHarris regime has sought to curry favor with influencers on ToikTok over the years, including inviting some to film short videos at the White House, the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza has turned some against the regime.

show less
Despite explicitly banning political advertisements on their platform since 2019, the Chinese-owned media giant TikTok still shows alleged paid political ads, including several linked to Democrat activist groups. Recent findings indicate that this prohibition has not entirely prevented the circulation of paid political messages. show more

Kamala’s Wiki Page Increased ‘Black’ Mentions by 1000%.

The Wikipedia page for Kamala Harris has undergone many changes in the last decade, including mentions of her background, which has slowly become more black over the years.

In 2012, Wikipedia listed Harris, then the San Francisco District Attorney, as African-American, Tamil-American, and Asian-American—though neither of her parents is African-American; her mother is Indian and her father is a Jamaican of African and European heritage. One of Harris’s ancestors, Hamilton Brown, was an infamous slave owner.

Harris’s 2012 Wikipedia page, saved on the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine website, only mentions the word “black” three times. In 2019, however, when Harris served as a Senator, mentions of “black” on her Wikipedia page increased to ten. References to her attending a black Baptist church alongside a Hindu temple growing up also appear.

This year, the number of mentions of “black” significantly increased to 34 overall, with long screeds discussing the “African-American intellectuals and rights advocates” Harris was allegedly surrounded by in her youth.

While mentions of her Indian background on her mother’s side remain on the page, much of the description of Harris’s life is focused on her black background and issues related to African-Americans.

Harris’s background and identity have become a focal point of her campaign, as she has been less than forthcoming on real policy proposals. Even the New York Times says Harris’s “Blackness” will do no more to improve the country than former President Barack Obama‘s did during his presidency.

Harris, despite being a descendant of slave owners, has compared police officers to slavers, resulting in demands she apologize. Donald Trump is the only living president, including Obama, whose ancestors never owned slaves.

WATCH:

Image by Gage Skidmore.

show less
The Wikipedia page for Kamala Harris has undergone many changes in the last decade, including mentions of her background, which has slowly become more black over the years. show more

France Charges Telegram CEO With 12 Counts: Complicity To Child Porn, Drugs, Fraud, & More.

French prosecutors have charged Telegram CEO Pavel Durov with 12 criminal counts, including complicity in the possession and distribution of child pornography, fraud, and the sale and distribution of illegal narcotics. Prosecutor Laure Beccuau released a statement Monday outlining the charges against Durov, who was arrested upon entering France on Saturday, August 24.

The statement claims French authorities began an investigation into an unnamed person in early July on the 12 counts, including refusing to allow French authorities to see user data or information requested.

Another charge involves Durov providing cryptology services without certified declaration and laundering proceeds derived from an organized group’s offenses and crimes. Prosecutor Beccuau also accuses the Telegram CEO of web-mastering a platform to enable illegal transactions in an organized group. Durov’s lawyers have dismissed the allegations, saying they are like car manufacturers being blamed and charged when their products are used for criminal activity.

Many critics of the French prosecutors have pointed to the arrest and prosecution as an issue of freedom of speech, including Durov’s native Russia. Former spy and current Russian MP Maria Butina called the arrest a witch hunt and declared free speech dead in Europe.

MUSK & TECH CEOs SLAM  FRANCE.

Elon Musk, the owner of X (formerly Twitter), has also spoken out on the arrest, posting an interview between Durov and Tucker Carlson with the hashtag #freePavel.

Musk has come under considerable pressure from the European Union to censor his platform after being accused of allowing “illegal” hate speech and other illegal activity. European Commissioner Thierry Breton even threatened Musk, demanding he censor an interview with former President Donald J. Trump earlier this month.

Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski also weighed in, claiming he had also been threatened by French authorities and said the arrest was crossing a red line, calling for Durov’s immediate release. Pavlovski added that his company has now “departed Europe” entirely after the video platform had already left France and been banned in China and Russia.


🚨 In a world where publishers are increasingly threatened for speaking the truth, please consider supporting The National Pulse to help us ward off such attacks and keep our radically independent news online.

show less
French prosecutors have charged Telegram CEO Pavel Durov with 12 criminal counts, including complicity in the possession and distribution of child pornography, fraud, and the sale and distribution of illegal narcotics. Prosecutor Laure Beccuau released a statement Monday outlining the charges against Durov, who was arrested upon entering France on Saturday, August 24. show more

Could Google Really Be Broken Up?

Google could soon be broken up into smaller companies after the Internet search giant was found to be in violation of U.S. antitrust law last week. The Justice Department (DOJ) is weighing a range of potential remedies to Google‘s search monopoly for consideration by a federal judge. One option would be to force the company to spin off parts of its business, like the Chrome browser and Android smartphone.

While breaking up Google is a distinct possibility, other options under consideration include forcing the tech giant to adopt data interoperability—meaning they’d be required to share data with competitors. Additionally, the court could nullify deals that make Google’s search engine the default setting on various devices, including Apple‘s iPhone.

The DOJ is reportedly consulting with technology industry experts and companies impacted by Google‘s monopoly regarding potential remedies. According to individuals close to the discussions, the deliberations are currently in preliminary stages.

Judge Amit P. Mehta of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, overseeing the case, has directed both the DOJ and Google to establish a procedural framework by September 4. A subsequent hearing to outline the next steps is set for September 6.

Last week’s judgment against Google represents a significant milestone in antitrust enforcement. The ruling will likely intensify the scrutiny of technology conglomerates such as Apple, Amazon, and Meta, which are also facing antitrust investigations. Google is scheduled for another antitrust trial focused on ad technology next month.

The implications for the tech giant are substantial, given the company’s evolution into a $2 trillion enterprise driven by a robust online advertising apparatus and other ventures tied to its search engine. Last year, Google‘s search engine and associated businesses generated $175 billion in revenue.

show less
Google could soon be broken up into smaller companies after the Internet search giant was found to be in violation of U.S. antitrust law last week. The Justice Department (DOJ) is weighing a range of potential remedies to Google's search monopoly for consideration by a federal judge. One option would be to force the company to spin off parts of its business, like the Chrome browser and Android smartphone. show more

Google Monopoly Ruling in U.S. Raises Questions for Search Engine’s Future.

In a landmark decision, a U.S. District Court judge has found that Google illegally used its market dominance to suppress competition. The case, which has significant implications for the tech industry, was initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) under then-President Donald Trump in 2020. Subsequently, the agency charged Google with abusing its monopoly in online search and advertising, leading to inflated prices for advertisers and limited options for consumers.

During the trial, DOJ attorneys argued that Google’s control over the search engine market allowed it to maintain high advertising prices. They also claimed that Google‘s financial position enabled the company to invest extensively in its search engine, further entrenching its dominance. Google countered these allegations by asserting that users have historically switched search engines if they were not satisfied with the results, citing Yahoo’s prior dominance in the 1990s.

After months of consideration, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google had violated antitrust laws. In his written opinion, Mehta described Google as a “monopolist” and asserted that the company acted in an anti-competitive manner.

The decision paves the way for a new legal phase in which the court will determine the penalties and changes required to mitigate Google‘s anti-competitive behavior. Potential outcomes range from significant measures, such as dismantling parts of its business, to more moderate actions aimed at promoting competition and consumer choice.

Google is expected to appeal the ruling, possibly taking the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

show less
In a landmark decision, a U.S. District Court judge has found that Google illegally used its market dominance to suppress competition. The case, which has significant implications for the tech industry, was initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) under then-President Donald Trump in 2020. Subsequently, the agency charged Google with abusing its monopoly in online search and advertising, leading to inflated prices for advertisers and limited options for consumers. show more