Friday, September 19, 2025

Trump Uses Presidential Authority to Send Weapons to Ukraine for the First Time.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump is set to send weapons directly to Ukraine from Pentagon reserves under the Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) for the first time since his reelection.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Pentagon officials, and Ukrainian forces.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The decision was announced this week, following a temporary halt in shipments, amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and Russian advances.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We get a lot of bulls**t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The move could provide Ukraine with up to $300 million in military aid, including Patriot missiles.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump is poised to exercise his authority to deliver weapons directly to Ukraine from Pentagon stockpiles for the first time, according to Reuters, citing two sources. Previously, the Trump administration had only supplied arms approved during former President Joe Biden’s term.

Trump is expected to utilize the Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA), which enables presidents to provide military assistance in urgent situations swiftly. This decision comes despite ongoing concerns about the depletion of U.S. military equipment in general and missile interceptors in particular ahead of a possible direct confrontation with a major power like Russia or China.

On Tuesday, Trump signaled that additional weapons would be sent to Ukraine as Russian advances and airstrikes escalate. The aid package, reportedly valued at up to $300 million, will likely include Patriot air defense missiles and medium-range rockets.

President Trump had appeared reluctant to arm Ukraine to the same extent as Biden before now, indicating this was encouraging the Ukrainian government to refuse a compromise peace. However, he has expressed frustration at Russia also appearing disinterested in peace in recent weeks, telling the press, “We get a lot of bulls**t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.”

The U.S. military reportedly only has about 25 percent of the Patriot missile interceptors it needs. Some have already been sent to Ukraine over recent years, and others have been depleted defending Israel against Iranian missile strikes. U.S. defense manufacturers are reportedly capable of producing only about 500 Patriot missiles annually, raising questions about the long-term viability of sustaining current aid levels to Ukraine.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump, Hegseth Move to Establish Drone War Dominance.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Pentagon is implementing a new program aimed at equipping most U.S. Army squads with small attack drones by the end of next year, reversing several Biden-era directives restricting the production and use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS).

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, the U.S. military, and the former Biden government.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The program was outlined in a memo issued by Hegseth on Thursday, July 10, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The U.S. military has the Nation’s best and brightest in its ranks. Our adversaries have a head start in small UAS, but we will perform a technological leapfrog and establish small UAS domain dominance by the end of 2027. We will accomplish this urgent goal by combining the Nation’s best qualities, including risk-taking.” — Secretary Hegseth

🎯IMPACT: The initiative is part of a broader Pentagon effort to adjust and update military tactics in response to the evolution of drone warfare, and will prioritize equipping units under the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. Notably, small drones have become key weapons in Ukraine and the Middle East in recent years.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump‘s Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, is eyeing a significant overhaul of how the United States Army utilizes drone technology. A new directive issued by Secretary Hegseth could see most U.S. Army squads issued small attack drones for use in combat by the end of next year.

The initiative is part of a broader Pentagon effort to adjust and update military tactics in response to the evolution of drone warfare seen in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, as well as the utilization of small drones by the Islamic Republic of Iran and its terror group proxies in the Middle East.

“While global military drone production skyrocketed over the last three years, the previous administration deployed red tape. U.S. units are not outfitted with the lethal small drones the modern battlefield requires,” Hegseth wrote in a memo issued on Thursday. He continued: “I am rescinding restrictive policies that hindered production and limited access to these vital technologies, unleashing the combined potential of American manufacturing and warfighter ingenuity.”

“The U.S. military has the Nation’s best and brightest in its ranks. Our adversaries have a head start in small UAS, but we will perform a technological leapfrog and establish small UAS domain dominance by the end of 2027. We will accomplish this urgent goal by combining the Nation’s best qualities, including risk-taking,” the Defense Secretary added.

Notably, the program’s initial phase will prioritize equipping units under the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command with small attack drones. This appears to reflect the Pentagon’s concern over increasing Chinese aggression in the Pacific and the communist country’s own utilization of unmanned aerial systems (UAS).

In June, President Trump signed an Executive Order aimed at boosting U.S. production of UAS weapons and other drone technology. Trump’s order effectively clears the way for Secretary Hegseth to scrap a series of restrictions established by the former Biden government on the production, acquisition, and use of small drone systems for military purposes.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Tells Republican Lawmakers to Defund PBS and NPR or Lose His Support.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump issued a statement urging Republicans to support his Recissions Bill.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The statement was made on Truth Social.

💬KEY QUOTE: “DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR), which is worse than CNN & MSDNC put together.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Trump warned that Republicans supporting the continued funding of PBS and NPR would lose his endorsement.

IN FULL

In a recent post on Truth Social, President Donald J. Trump urged Republicans to back cut funding to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which encompasses PBS and NPR, in an administration-backed Recissions Bill. Defunding federally funded media outlets with a partisan bias has been an early priority for the America First leader, with Kari Lake spearheading budget and staffing cuts at the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM).

“It is very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill and, in particular, DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR), which is worse than CNN & MSDNC put together. Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” he wrote.

President Trump previously signed an executive order aimed at restricting funding to NPR and PBS, describing them as “entities that receive tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds each year to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as ‘news.’”

“No media outlet has a constitutional right to taxpayer subsidies, and the Government is entitled to determine which categories of activities to subsidize,” he added.

Both outlets have been embroiled in anti-Trump controversies, with NPR’s CEO admitting it failed to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story adequately ahead of the 2020 election, and PBS alleging Trump planned to “purge” LGBT Americans in 2024, for instance.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

T-Mobile Axes DEI as It Seeks Merger Permission from Trump FCC.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: T-Mobile announced it will eliminate its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, citing legal and internal restructuring reasons.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: T-Mobile, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the Trump administration.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made public on Wednesday, July 10, through a letter sent to the FCC.

💬KEY QUOTE: “T-Mobile will no longer have any individual roles or teams focused on DEI,” the company stated in a memo.

🎯IMPACT: The move aligns with the Trump administration’s broad pressure against corporate DEI policies and coincides with T-Mobile’s pursuit of federal approval for two major business transactions.

IN FULL

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has scored another major win for the Trump administration with T-Mobile, the second-largest wireless carrier in the United States, announcing it has ended its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. T-Mobile states the decision to scrap its DEI initiatives stems from legal and restructuring reasons, but the move is widely seen as an effort to comply with President Donald J. Trump’s directives ending federal government contracts with companies that promote discriminatory DEI policies.

T-Mobile’s decision was made public on Wednesday in a letter sent to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr. The FCC has aggressively enforced President Trump’s rollback of DEI, using its regulatory power to encourage major U.S. telecommunications and technology companies to ditch the discriminatory policy.

The company claims it is ending DEI-related policies “not just in name, but in substance.” Employees previously assigned to DEI-specific roles will be reassigned within the Human Resources department to focus more broadly on employee culture and engagement. T-Mobile clarified that it will no longer maintain any positions or teams focused solely on DEI initiatives.

“First, the handful of T-Mobile employees who focused on diversity and inclusion will be redirected within Human Resources to focus on employee culture and engagement. As a result, T-Mobile will no longer have any individual roles or teams focused on ‘DEI.’ T-Mobile is also removing any language, logos, or other references to DEI on its websites, and will ensure that company websites and future communications do not have any references to DEI or diversity, equity, and inclusion, and are consistent with T-Mobile’s commitment to promote nondiscrimination and equal employment opportunity,” the company said in its memo.

T-Mobile is currently seeking approval from federal regulators to conduct two major business transactions. The company is pursuing a $4 billion deal to acquire nearly all of US Cellular’s regional carrier wireless operations, including customers, stores, and other assets. Additionally, T-Mobile is working on a joint venture with KKR to acquire Internet provider Metronet.

Image by Phil Dolby.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

EXPLAINED: Judge Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order Despite SCOTUS Ruling.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge has issued a nationwide injunction blocking President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Order ending birthright citizenship, despite a Supreme Court ruling last month barring lower courts from granting such relief beyond their jurisdiction.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Normand Laplante, the United States Supreme Court, President Donald J. Trump, and the children of immigrants born on or after January 20, 2025.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The injunction was issued on Thursday, July 10, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The court hereby finds that Class Petitioners have demonstrated likelihood of success on the merits of their claims; that Class Petitioners are likely to suffer irreparable harm if the order is not granted,” wrote Judge Laplante.

🎯IMPACT: Despite the Supreme Court ruling limiting nationwide injunctions, Judge Laplante utilized the “wiggle room” in the ruling, which allows for nationwide injunctive relief to be granted in class action lawsuits where a viable class is established and certified by the court.

IN FULL

U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Normand Laplante has issued a nationwide injunction blocking President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Order ending birthright citizenship. While the U.S. Supreme Court ruled late last month that lower courts cannot—under most circumstances—grant injunctive relief beyond their jurisdiction, the high court left a degree of what Justice Samuel Alito called “wiggle room” for issuing nationwide injunctions as part of a class action lawsuit. This latter exception is how Judge Laplante, a George W. Bush appointee, made his ruling blocking the birthright citizenship order.

“After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions, the supporting declarations, the applicable law, and the filings and record in this case, the court GRANTS Petitioners’ Motion for a Classwide Preliminary Injunction,” Judge Laplante wrote in his ruling. He continued: “The court hereby finds that Class Petitioners have demonstrated likelihood of success on the merits of their claims; that Class Petitioners are likely to suffer irreparable harm if the order is not granted; that the potential harm to the class petitioners if the order is not granted outweighs the potential harm to Respondents if the order is granted; and that the issuance of this order is in the public interest.”

Notably, the injunction only provides relief from President Trump’s directive ending birthright citizenship for the class established by the court, which Judge Laplante defines as the children of immigrants born after the January 20, 2025, Executive Order went into effect. The federal judge, based in New Hampshire, also issued a seven-day stay on his injunction to allow time for the Trump administration to appeal the decision.

While Judge Laplante appears to have circumvented the constraints placed on nationwide injunctions by the Supreme Court, the expediency with which he recognized a viable class for the purposes of class action could be seen as dubious. Typically, establishing and certifying a viable class can take a relatively long period of time, with most class action lawsuits in the United States taking, on average, two to three years to conclude.

The Trump administration is expected to appeal the injunction.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

TikTok Is Being Investigated for Storing Western User Data in China, AGAIN.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The European Union’s top data privacy regulator announced it is launching its second investigation this year into whether TikTok is storing European user data on servers located in China, in violation of EU laws.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The EU, the Data Protection Commission (DPC), TikTok, ByteDance, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and U.S. President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The DPC investigation was announced on Thursday, July 10, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: The EU regulator expressed “deep concern” about the integrity of its prior investigation after discovering that “TikTok had submitted inaccurate information.”

🎯IMPACT: TikTok could face new financial sanctions after being fined €530 million ($620 million) in May over violating EU data privacy laws.

IN FULL

The Chinese-owned social media company TikTok is facing a second European Union (EU) investigation over allegations that it illegally transferred European user data to company servers in China. In May of this year, the EU’s Data Protection Commission (DPC) fined TikTok a total of €530 million ($620 million) over the same allegations—though the social media giant insists that EU user data was only accessed in China remotely and not directly stored on servers in the country.

On Thursday, the DPC announced it had opened a second investigation into TikTok’s data practices. The DPC also confirmed that earlier this year, TikTok admitted to the EU regulator that “limited EEA user data had in fact been stored on servers in China,” referring to the European Economic Area (EEA)—which includes EU member states as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway. The EU regulator stated it has “deep concern” about the integrity of the prior investigation after it was discovered that “TikTok had submitted inaccurate information.”

TikTok and its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, have been subject to increasing scrutiny in the EU and the United States over their data practices and allegations that they are under the direction of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). While the social media giant has made significant investments, to the tune of tens of billions of dollars, in building data services in Europe and the United States, either by its own admission or by evidence from whistleblowers, TikTok has been shown to have continued storing European and American data in China.

The latest EU investigation aims to determine if TikTok has, subsequent to the May DPC findings, brought itself into compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—the EU’s extensive data privacy law.

Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald J. Trump has continued to push for a non-Chinese company to purchase TikTok’s American operations from ByteDance. Trump has delayed a potential U.S. ban of the social media app several times as discussions over ByteDance’s divestment from it remain ongoing.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Would-Be Trump Assassin Ryan Routh Fires Lawyer, Wants to Represent Himself.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Ryan Wesley Routh, who attempted to assassinate President Donald J. Trump late last year, informed a federal court that he has fired his attorney and is requesting to represent himself.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ryan Routh, federal prosecutors, a U.S. federal court, and President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The court was informed of Routh’s decision on Thursday, July 10, 2025.

🎯IMPACT: It remains to be seen whether the court will deem Routh competent enough to represent himself. The 59-year-old faces serious consequences should he be found guilty, as attempting to assassinate a president can carry a sentence of life in prison or even the death penalty.

IN FULL

Would-be presidential assassin Ryan Wesley Routh announced in court on Thursday that he has fired his attorney and is requesting that he be allowed to represent himself. Routh is currently facing five federal charges, to which he has pleaded not guilty, stemming from a September 2024 attempt on President Donald J. Trump’s life. The federal trial is currently slated to begin on September 8, 2025, with Routh facing state charges as well.

Last year, Routh was discovered by the United States Secret Service (USSS) hiding with a SKS-style rifle amidst shrubbery on the edge of the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida. At the time, Trump was just several hundred yards away playing a round of golf. After spotting Routh positioned in cover with a rifle, a Secret Service agent performing an advance sweep, several holes ahead of Trump, fired four shots at the would-be assassin, causing him to flee the scene. Subsequently, Routh was pursued by law enforcement in a high-speed chase in which a six-year-old girl was nearly killed. He was apprehended some time later in Marin County, Florida, after causing a multi-car crash on a highway, which nearly resulted in the death of the young girl.

The 59-year-old Routh’s attempt to assassinate Trump appears to have been inspired by the former’s obsession with supporting Ukraine. The would-be assassin appears to have been deeply involved with efforts to send Afghanistan military veterans to Ukraine to assist in the country’s defense against Russia Additionally, federal prosecutors have produced a letter authored by Routh in which he pledges a six-figure cash bounty on President Trump, with the text also suggesting that he was likely inspired by the anti-Trump rhetoric pushed by the Democratic Party.

A separate November 2024 letter authored by Routh and sent to the media indicates that President Trump’s firm stance against Iran’s nuclear weapons program and sponsorship of terrorism was a secondary motivation for the assassination attempt. Notably, Iran has repeatedly threatened the life of Trump and other government officials in retaliation for a January 3, 2020, drone strike, which killed Iranian Quds Forces commander Qasem Soleimani.

It remains to be seen whether the court will deem Routh competent enough to represent himself. The 59-year-old faces serious consequences should he be found guilty of the federal charges. Attempting to assassinate a president can carry a sentence of life in prison or even the death penalty.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

John Kerry Admits ‘Trump Was Right’ on Strong Borders.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry acknowledged that “Trump was right” on immigration during an interview, criticizing Democrats for neglecting border issues.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: John Kerry, President Donald J. Trump, former President Joe Biden, and Trump White House advisor Stephen Miller, along with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Kerry’s comments were made during a BBC interview.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The first thing any President should say—or anybody in public life—is without a border protected, you don’t have a nation.” – John Kerry

🎯IMPACT: The remarks highlight growing bipartisan concerns over immigration policies and border security, with Republicans emphasizing enforcement and Democrats facing internal criticism.

IN FULL

Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has admitted that President Donald J. Trump was correct on border and immigration issues, stating, “Trump was right,” during an interview. He criticized Democrats for failing to address border security adequately, admitting the U.S.-Mexico border was “under siege” during Joe Biden’s presidency.

Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004, remarked, “The first thing any President should say—or anybody in public life—is without a border protected, you don’t have a nation.” He added, “I wish President Biden had been heard more often saying, I’m going to enforce the law.”

Illegal crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border have dropped to near-record lows during Trump’s second term. Trump has since prioritized deportations, particularly in Democrat-run cities such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, where large populations of illegal immigrants reside.

Stephen Miller, White House Deputy Chief of Staff and a key architect of Trump’s immigration policies, initially gave U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) a target of at least 3,000 arrests a day. However, with ICE funding significantly increased with the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Border Czar Tom Homan now hopes to hit 7,000 arrests a day.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
Purchased by The National Pulse

Secret Service Suspends Six Agents Over Trump Shooting.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Six Secret Service agents were suspended without pay following critical security failures during an assassination attempt on President Donald J. Trump.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, six Secret Service agents, shooter Thomas Crooks, and Deputy Director Matt Quinn.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The assassination attempt occurred at a 2024 campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Secret Service is totally accountable for Butler,” said Deputy Director Matt Quinn, adding: “Butler was an operational failure and we are focused today on ensuring that it never happens again.”

🎯IMPACT: The suspensions are part of broader reforms, including deploying military-grade drones and new mobile command units, to prevent similar incidents.

IN FULL

The Secret Service suspended six agents without pay on Wednesday in response to critical security failures during last year’s assassination attempt on President Donald Trump at a 2024 campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

The decision, confirmed by Deputy Director Matt Quinn in an interview with CBS News, comes nearly a year after a gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Crooks, opened fire as Trump spoke, striking the America First leader’s ear and seriously wounding two attendees, one of whom died.

Quinn described the suspensions, which range from 10 to 42 days, as part of a broader effort to address systemic issues. However, he defended the decision not to punish anybody in the immediate aftermath of the assassination attempt, insisting, “We aren’t going to fire our way out of this.”

“We’re going to focus on the root cause and fix the deficiencies that put us in that situation,” he added.

Following their suspensions, each of the six agents will be reassigned to less critical roles. Quinn also noted that the agency has implemented significant reforms, including the deployment of military-grade drones and new mobile command units to ensure better coordination with local law enforcement.

The Butler incident, along with another foiled attempt weeks later in Florida, led to the resignation of then-Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, despite the fact she initially insisted she would stay in post. A December congressional report labeled the attack “tragic and preventable,” citing a catalogue of errors, including leadership and training deficiencies, as key factors.

“Secret Service is totally accountable for Butler,” Quinn admitted. “Butler was an operational failure.”

Image by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Tariffs Target Another Seven Nations.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump issued tariff letters to seven countries on Wednesday. This follows his announcement on Monday of the imposition of trade duties on a number of countries, including Japan and South Korea.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Countries targeted were the Philippines, Brunei, Moldova, Algeria, Libya, Iraq, and Sri Lanka.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Letters were sent on Wednesday, with tariffs set to begin August 1. Meanwhile, discussions with the European Union (EU) bloc and a number of individual nations remain ongoing.

💬KEY QUOTE: “You guys are going to fight, we’re not going to trade. And we seem to be quite successful in doing that.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The tariffs aim to address trade imbalances and boost American manufacturing.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has announced new tariffs targeting seven smaller U.S. trading partners, including the Philippines, Brunei, Moldova, Algeria, Libya, Iraq, and Sri Lanka. The tariffs, ranging from 20 percent to 30 percent, will take effect on August 1. Notably, the move follows the America First leader’s imposition of trade duties on Japan and South Korea this past Monday, along with a number of other nations.

The Trump administration has consistently contended that tariffs are a tool to address long-standing trade imbalances and bolster the U.S. economy. During a meeting with African leaders on Wednesday afternoon, Trump emphasized how his trade policies are also serving a key diplomatic purpose, highlighting his administration’s successful facilitation of peace deals between India and Pakistan, as well as Rwanda and Congo. According to Trump, trade “seems to be a foundation” for his success in settling foreign disputes, adding: “You guys are going to fight, we’re not going to trade. And we seem to be quite successful in doing that.”

The letters, posted on Truth Social, followed a 90-day negotiation period that saw the imposition of a 10 percent global tariff. Trump indicated there would be no extensions for the targeted countries. The tariffs are part of a broader strategy that includes recent import taxes of 25 percent on Japan and South Korea. The European Union (EU), a frequent focus of Trump’s trade grievances, has not yet received similar tariff letters.

Critics argue that the tariffs could worsen inflation and slow economic growth, though economic data has yet to show the traded duties producing any inflationary pressure. In fact, as The National Pulse noted in past reporting, tariffs have historically generated a degree of deflationary pressure.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration asserts that the measures will reduce trade deficits and encourage the return of manufacturing jobs to the United States.

America often finds itself at an unfair disadvantage competing against foreign countries where pay and conditions are poor, governments subsidise their producers, or American goods are themselves subject to punitive tariff and non-tariff barriers, if not a combination of all three.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more