Tuesday, December 16, 2025
Newsom Abortion Tourism

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DEAD BABIES INC: Newsom Rushes to Boost CA’s Abortion Tourism Industry.

Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom will propose legislation designed to boost abortion tourism from neighboring Arizona. The proposed bill would provide Arizona abortionists expedited licenses in California in order to provide abortions for the influx of Arizonans expected to travel to California for the procedures.

“Arizona AG Kris Mayes identified a need to expedite the ability for Arizona abortion providers to continue to provide care to Arizonans as a way to support patients in their state seeking abortion care in California,” Brandon Richards, a spokesman for Newsom, said in a statement. If the bill passes, Arizona abortionists may be able to get approval to work in California in as little as five days.

Newsom’s move follows the Arizona Supreme Court’s upholding of an 1864 law that effectively bans all abortions in the state. The ruling has proved highly controversial, and the Biden campaign has seized on it in an effort to link former President Donald Trump to local state efforts to implement abortion restrictions.

Trump, however, has made it clear that he does not wish to enact a nationwide federal ban on abortions, arguing that the matter is one on which individual states should decide. He also cautioned Republicans on the unpopularity of total bans with voters and the risk such bans pose to Republicans’ electoral prospects.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Job Growth Stalls with Unemployment Hitting Four-Year High.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Employers added 64,000 jobs in November, exceeding forecasts, but October saw a loss of 105,000 jobs, according to new government data.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. employers, the Labor Department, Federal Reserve economists, and private firms such as ADP.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Data covers October and November 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Job growth has been anemic,” said Federal Reserve Bank of New York president John C. Williams.

🎯IMPACT: The labor market remains under pressure, with rising unemployment and economic uncertainty slowing job growth.

IN FULL

The U.S. economy added 64,000 jobs in November, surpassing economists’ forecasts, according to new government data. However, the unemployment rate rose to 4.6 percent, marking the highest level since September 2021. Meanwhile, October’s figures revealed a loss of 105,000 jobs, signaling ongoing challenges in the labor market.

Notably, economists had predicted a gain of 40,000 jobs in November. The Labor Department also revised job growth figures for August and September, lowering them by a combined 33,000. Analysts attributed October’s weak performance partly to federal deferred resignation buyout offers.

The release of October and November employment data was delayed due to the 43-day government shutdown by Senate Democrats. During the blackout, economists turned to alternative sources, such as ADP, which reported private-sector job cuts of 32,000 in November.

Federal Reserve Bank of New York president John C. Williams noted the gradual cooling of the labor market. “I should emphasize that this has been an ongoing, gradual process, without signs of a sharp rise in layoffs or other indications of rapid deterioration,” Williams said. Still, he acknowledged, “Job growth has been anemic.”

Image by Tony Webster.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Lawmaker Pushes to Legalize Euthanasia for Pregnant Women.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A lawmaker for Britain’s governing Labour Party has stated that pregnancy should not prevent a woman from accessing “assisted dying” under proposed euthanasia legislation.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Lord Charles Falconer and members of the House of Lords.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The debate occurred during the committee stage of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in the House of Lords earlier this month.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It is clear from the choice that I am supporting that we take the view that pregnancy should not be a bar to [euthanasia].” – Lord Falconer

🎯IMPACT: The debate highlights significant ethical and legal concerns regarding euthanasia, particularly in cases involving pregnancy.

IN FULL

A lawmaker for Britain’s governing Labour Party is arguing that pregnancy should not prevent a woman from being euthanized by the state, despite her child also being killed by the process. Lord Charles Falconer, a former Secretary of State for Justice under close personal friend Tony Blair, told the House of Lords that pregnancy should not automatically prevent a woman from accessing so-called “assisted dying” under Britain‘s proposed euthanasia legislation, as peers continue detailed scrutiny of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.

Speaking during committee stage debates on amendments, Lord Falconer responded to concerns raised by another peer about how assisted suicide laws deal with pregnancy in other countries. Oregon was cited as requiring efforts to keep the mother alive if the unborn child is “viable,” while the Netherlands allows for aborting babies before euthanizing their mothers. Lord Falconer made clear that the approach he supports would not treat pregnancy as an exclusion. “It is clear from the choice that I am supporting that we take the view that pregnancy should not be a bar to it,” he said.

Euthanasia remains illegal throughout the United Kingdom under the Suicide Act 1961, which carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years. However, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, introduced as a Private Members’ Bill, has passed key votes in 2024 and 2025. If it becomes law, it would permit assisted suicide in England and Wales for terminally ill adults expected to live six months or less, subject to court approval.

The debate has drawn attention to international experiences with assisted suicide. In Canada, so-called medical assistance in dying (MAiD) has expanded significantly since its introduction in 2016. Government data indicate that by the end of 2025, the cumulative number of Canadians who have been killed through MAiD could approach 100,000, with the practice accounting for roughly five percent of all deaths nationwide. Eligibility has broadened over time, and critics argue that the rapid growth endangers vulnerable people, particularly those with disabilities or limited access to care.

Canada’s program has also been linked to organ harvesting. Reports indicate that hundreds of MAiD patients have donated organs following euthanization, with a small but notable share of deceased-donor transplants now involving individuals who died under the program. Supporters see this as a benefit to transplant recipients, while opponents warn of ethical risks.

Image by Mp3juicecon.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Peace Talks Point to Ukraine Joining the EU Rather Than NATO.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: American and Ukrainian negotiators met in Berlin, Germany, to discuss a 20-point agreement aimed at ending the conflict in Ukraine.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: American and Ukrainian officials, including President Volodymyr Zelensky, and, reportedly, Russian representatives.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Monday, December 15, 2025, in Berlin, Germany.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Europe and Russia can finally have an arrangement and understanding that can lead to a more peaceful and prosperous future for everyone.” – U.S. official

🎯IMPACT: The proposed deal could end the nearly four-year-long conflict and reshape Ukraine’s security arrangements.

IN FULL

American and Ukrainian officials have held talks in Berlin, Germany, focused on what negotiators described as a “very strong security package” for Kiev, aimed at ending the nearly four-year-long war with Russia. One official indicated that Russia may now be open to Ukraine joining the European Union (EU). Notably, the EU includes a mutual defense clause similar to NATO’s Article 5—but it covers only EU members, not the United States.

According to officials familiar with the discussions, the current proposals center on a 20-point agreement that would provide Ukraine with “Article Five-like security guarantees” from the United States and allied nations, offering NATO-style protections without Ukraine formally joining the alliance. “Europe and Russia can finally have an arrangement and understanding that can lead to a more peaceful and prosperous future for everyone,” a U.S. official said.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has publicly suggested he is willing to set aside Ukraine’s bid for NATO membership in favor of bilateral security guarantees from the United States and European partners. While NATO officials have previously said Ukraine will eventually join the alliance after the war ends, Zelensky’s recent statements point to a more flexible negotiating position focused on alternative security assurances rather than formal alliance membership.

The European Union dimension remains complicated. Ukraine is officially a candidate for EU membership; however, accession requires the unanimous approval of all member states. Hungary, a NATO member, recently held a national consultation in which voters rejected Ukraine’s EU entry, with Prime Minister Viktor Orbán arguing that admitting Ukraine would effectively import the war into the bloc. That opposition underscores the political hurdles Kiev faces even as negotiations advance.

A U.S. official involved in the Berlin talks said that President Donald J. Trump is prepared to submit the agreement to the U.S. Senate for ratification if it is finalized.

Image: European Union 2023– Source: EP.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

India Sees Sharp Rise in Anti-Christian Attacks, Weak Government Response: Report.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A report by the United Christian Forum indicates a significant rise in anti-Christian violence in India, with a 500 percent increase over the last decade.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The United Christian Forum nonprofit, the Christian minority in India, and India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Anti-Christian attacks are ongoing, primarily in five Indian states, including Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh.

🎯IMPACT: The rise in violence has led to protests and increased scrutiny of India’s human rights record, affecting its international image.

IN FULL

A recent report issued by the United Christian Forum notes a concerning rise in anti-Christian violence in India, with a 500 percent increase in incidents over the last decade. In 2025 alone, there have been 549 recorded attacks, yet only 39 resulted in police investigations, indicating a 93 percent impunity rate.

Since 2014, under Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) rule, the growth of Hindutva ideology—effectively Hindu nationalism—has led to a political climate where violence against Christians is often overlooked. The BJP’s governance has seen the enactment of anti-conversion laws in several states, which critics argue are used to harass religious minorities.

The report notes that 77 percent of these attacks are concentrated in five states, including Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, affecting communities largely composed of Dalits—historically considered “untouchables” at the bottom of India’s caste system—who have converted to Christianity. These groups face significant persecution, including beatings, church burnings, and social exclusion.

In response to the ongoing violence, a large protest took place in New Delhi on November 29, 2025, organized by Christian groups to demand the protection of their rights and freedoms, supposedly guaranteed by the Indian Constitution. Around 2,000 Christians marched in protest against the increasing violence against their community and highlighted the exclusion of Christian Dalits from social programs.

India is currently seeking to be added as a permanent seat on the United Nations (UN) Security Council.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

U.S. Air Force Tanker Narrowly Misses Passenger Jet Near Venezuela.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A U.S. Air Force refueling tanker failed to communicate its position, narrowly avoiding a collision with a commercial JetBlue flight.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: JetBlue Flight 1112, the U.S. Air Force, Curaçao air traffic control, U.S. Southern Command, and Venezuelan authorities.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Friday, approximately 20 minutes after JetBlue Flight 1112 departed from Curaçao, about 40 miles off Venezuela’s coast.

💬KEY QUOTE: “They don’t have their transponder turned on, it’s outrageous. We almost had a midair collision up here.” – JetBlue pilot

🎯IMPACT: Federal authorities have been alerted, and investigations are underway into the U.S. military’s actions in Caribbean airspace.

IN FULL

A U.S. Air Force refueling tanker narrowly avoided colliding with a JetBlue passenger jet after the military aircraft failed to properly communicate its position, forcing the commercial pilot to take evasive action shortly after takeoff from Curaçao. JetBlue Flight 1112 was en route to New York when the encounter occurred roughly 20 minutes into the flight. The JetBlue pilot immediately reported the incident to air traffic control, expressing alarm over the tanker’s apparent lack of visibility on radar. “They don’t have their transponder turned on, it’s outrageous. We almost had a midair collision up here,” the pilot said.

Air traffic controllers confirmed they were unable to see the tanker on their radar systems and noted that similar issues involving unidentified military aircraft had recently been reported in the area. Curaçao air traffic control subsequently warned other pilots operating in the region about the aircraft.

U.S. Southern Command acknowledged the reports and said it is reviewing what happened. “Safety remains a top priority, and we are working through the appropriate channels to assess the facts surrounding the situation,” Colonel Manny Ortiz said.

JetBlue confirmed that it has reported the incident to federal authorities and said it will cooperate fully with any investigation.

The near miss occurred amid increased U.S. military activity in the Caribbean, linked to efforts targeting drug traffickers and possibly Venezuela‘s Marxist dictator, Nicolás Maduro. Recent operations have included the seizure of a stateless oil tanker, which Maduro described as an “act of piracy.” U.S. military operations in the region have also included strikes on drug-smuggling vessels, which have reportedly resulted in more than 80 deaths.

The incident adds to a growing list of recent aviation safety concerns involving both military and commercial aircraft. Earlier this year, an Army Black Hawk helicopter collided with a passenger jet near Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C., killing 67 people. Investigators later determined that the helicopter pilot ignored critical flight instructions in the moments before the crash.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Bessent Replaces Biden-Era DEI Coins for America’s 250th Birthday.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Mint revealed new coin designs for America’s 250th anniversary, featuring eagles, pilgrims, and George Washington, while dropping diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) themes selected by the former Biden government.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the U.S. Mint, the Trump administration, and the former Biden government.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced December 2025 by the U.S. Mint.

💬KEY QUOTE: The Trump administration noted the Biden-era designs “did not feature a single Founding Father but instead emphasized diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) themes.”

🎯IMPACT: The redesign shifts focus back to America’s Founding Fathers and traditional symbols, moving away from DEI-centric themes.

IN FULL

The U.S. Mint has dropped diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) themes selected by the former Biden government to adorn coins commemorating America’s 250th anniversary. Instead, new designs have been chosen that feature traditional American symbols, such as eagles, pilgrims, and President George Washington.

Notably, the Biden-era coin designs—which were never publicly released—focused heavily on DEI-related imagery and omitted the Founding Fathers entirely. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reportedly scrapped those plans under the guidance of the Trump White House.

The U.S. Mint has not officially commented on or released images of the Biden-era concepts. However, the Trump White House has criticized the previous designs for sidelining America’s historical figures and traditional values in favor of a DEI-oriented narrative. The new designs appear to reflect a return to celebrating the country’s founding and heritage.

The National Pulse reported in early October that the U.S. Mint was considering a $1 commemorative coin celebrating the United States of America’s 250th birthday that will feature an image of President Donald J. Trump. The U.S. Treasurer, Brandon Beach, revealed the proposed design, stating, “No fake news here. These first drafts honoring America’s 250th Birthday and [President Trump] are real.”

The front of the coin features President Trump in profile, like other presidents appearing on U.S. currency. On the back of the coin is an engraving of Trump standing in front of an American flag, raising his fist into the air—a reference to him raising his fist after being shot in the ear by a would-be assassin during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Notably, U.S. law technically prohibits living presidents from appearing on the country’s currency. However, commemorative coins struck by the U.S. Mint are allowed to feature living presidents while also retaining their denominated value.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump to Declare Fentanyl a Weapon of Mass Destruction.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced plans to classify fentanyl as a “weapon of mass destruction” to intensify his fight against drug smuggling.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, U.S. troops, and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Monday, in the Oval Office, Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There’s no doubt that America’s adversaries are trafficking fentanyl into the United States in part because they want to kill Americans. If this were a war, that would be one of the worst wars.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The classification could lead to harsher penalties for traffickers and increase efforts to curb fentanyl smuggling.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump announced on Monday that he will move to designate fentanyl as a “weapon of mass destruction” as part of his intensified campaign against drug smuggling. Speaking from the Oval Office, where he was presenting medals to U.S. troops patrolling the U.S.-Mexico border, Trump emphasized the deadly impact of fentanyl and its role in harming Americans.

“There’s no doubt that America’s adversaries are trafficking fentanyl into the United States in part because they want to kill Americans. If this were a war, that would be one of the worst wars,” Trump said. He compared the current crisis to the Opium Wars of the 19th century, when China suffered from widespread drug addiction and foreign exploitation.

Fentanyl, despite having legitimate medical uses, is lethal in small doses and is often smuggled across the U.S.-Mexico border or through international mail systems. Nearly 330,000 Americans died from fentanyl overdoses in the five-year period ending in April, highlighting the scale of the crisis.

Trump noted that China is the primary source of illegal fentanyl. He previously met with Chinese President Xi Jinping, who pledged to work on limiting fentanyl trafficking. The President did not specify the immediate effects of the new classification but indicated that it could result in tougher criminal charges for traffickers and bolster efforts to combat the influx of the deadly drug.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DOJ Accuses Democratic Campaign Arm of Obstruction in California Redistricting Case.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) accused the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) of withholding key redistricting documents related to California’s Proposition 50.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The DOJ, the DCCC, consultant Paul Mitchell, and California Governor Gavin Newsom (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The allegations surfaced ahead of a three-day federal court hearing beginning Monday in California.

💬KEY QUOTE: A source familiar with the DOJ’s thinking described the redistricting effort as a “brazen power grab” and accused the Newsom administration of “covering up the racially driven design” of the map.

🎯IMPACT: The DOJ claims the map prioritizes racial considerations, potentially violating constitutional protections, and has asked the court to block Proposition 50.

IN FULL

In a new federal court filing, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) contends the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)—the House Democrats’ official campaign arm—worked to actively obstruct and interfere with the discovery process in a lawsuit concerning California’s Proposition 50. The DOJ alleges that the DCCC, along with consultant Paul Mitchell, withheld key documents and provided a massive data dump of files just days before a federal court hearing began—in an apparent attempt to prevent DOJ attorneys from having enough time to review the evidence.

According to the DOJ, Mitchell’s records included evidence that racial considerations were prioritized in the redistricting process. One slide deck reportedly promoted how the map would increase voting opportunities for Latino residents. The DOJ further stated that the DCCC misled the court by claiming it lacked control over Mitchell’s records, despite having a contractual right to access them.

The lawsuit, which the DOJ joined alongside the California Republican Party, alleges that Proposition 50 constitutes unconstitutional racial gerrymandering. The ballot measure, passed in November, allows for a new congressional map to be drawn in time for the 2026 midterms. The DOJ argues that the map was designed to favor Democrats and cancel out likely Republican gains from redistricting efforts in Texas.

A source familiar with the DOJ’s position criticized Governor Gavin Newsom‘s (D-CA) administration, telling media it appeared to be “covering up the racially driven design” of the map. The source described the plan as a “brazen power grab” that divides voters based on race and undermines the electoral process.

The DCCC has denied the allegations, claiming the DOJ is overstating its access to Mitchell’s files and attempting to “slam square pegs into round holes” to bolster its case. The DOJ has requested that the court find race to have been a significant factor in the drawing of the map, which would support the broader claim that Proposition 50 violates constitutional protections.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Obama Judge Faces Backlash for Praising Convicted Illegal Immigrant Rapist.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An illegal immigrant convicted of raping a woman with cerebral palsy could walk free sooner than expected after a judge reduced his sentence.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Honduran illegal immigrant Edys Renan Membreño Díaz and U.S. District Court Judge Judith Levy.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Sentencing occurred in August, with appeals filed in October, in Michigan.

💬KEY QUOTE: “You’ve taken responsibility for that, expressed remorse for that, and you are serving a lengthy state sentence as punishment for that conduct.” – Judge Judith Levy

🎯IMPACT: Federal prosecutors are appealing the judge’s decision to reduce the sentence, citing its leniency and lack of weight on the violent crime.

IN FULL

U.S. District Court Judge Judith Levy, appointed to the bench by former President Barack Obama, is facing significant backlash over an inexplicable decision granting a light sentence to illegal immigrant Edys Renan Membreño Díaz, a 30-year-old Honduran national, convicted of raping a woman with cerebral palsy and cognitive delays. Membreño Díaz has faced multiple deportations and illegally re-entered the United States at least seven times.

Appointed as the first openly lesbian U.S. district judge in the Eastern District of Michigan by Barack Obama, Levy reduced Membreño Díaz’s sentence by two years, sparing him additional time in prison. During his sentencing in August, Levy praised the illegal immigrant, calling him an “ambassador for living up to our immigration restrictions.” Membreño Díaz was convicted of dragging his cognitively impaired victim into the laundry room of her apartment building before committing the sexual assault.

Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin criticized the decision, describing it as “unspeakable depravity” and “truly wicked.” Federal prosecutors have since appealed the ruling, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Meghan Sweeney Bean arguing that the sentence was “substantively unreasonable” and failed to address the severity of the crime adequately.

Membreño Díaz, who pleaded guilty to three sex crimes in Michigan in 2022, claimed during his sentencing. “I was drunk, and I apologize to everybody, to all the American citizens. I wish to go back to my country and not to come back to the United States.” He also claimed he would discourage others in Honduras from entering the U.S. illegally.

Judge Levy defended her decision, commending Membreño Díaz for supposedly taking responsibility for his family and for his work in the United States. “I commend you for supporting your family, for expressing your devotion to them, and for working here in the United States in jobs that Americans apparently do not want to work in,” Levy stated. Prosecutors say that the ruling downplays the gravity of his crimes.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

White House Strongly Rebukes Israel for Breaking Gaza Ceasefire.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The White House reprimanded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for allegedly breaking a ceasefire with Hamas after the killing of a senior Hamas military commander, Raed Saad, on Saturday.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and White House officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ceasefire breach occurred on Saturday, December 13, 2025, following the killing of Raed Saad, with reactions unfolding in the U.S. and Israel.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If you want to ruin your reputation and show that you don’t abide by agreements, be our guest, but we won’t allow you to ruin President Trump’s reputation after he brokered the deal in Gaza,” the White House message reportedly stated.

🎯IMPACT: Concerns have been raised about the potential harm to U.S.-brokered peace efforts, including the Abraham Accords, and the perception of Israel’s actions in the Arab world.

IN FULL

The White House has reportedly expressed frustration with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after Israel killed Hamas military commander Raed Saad. According to reports, the U.S. views the action as a breach of the ceasefire agreement negotiated by President Donald J. Trump in August.

White House envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Trump adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner have reportedly grown increasingly frustrated with Netanyahu over issues related to Gaza. One U.S. official, speaking with the media, stated that Witkoff and Kushner are “pissed by Israeli inflexibility around several Gaza-related issues.”

A senior U.S. official reportedly conveyed a strong message to Netanyahu, saying, “If you want to ruin your reputation and show that you don’t abide by agreements, be our guest, but we won’t allow you to ruin President Trump’s reputation after he brokered the deal in Gaza.”

An Israeli official, however, pushed back on the claims, arguing that the killing of Raed Saad was a response to Hamas violations of the ceasefire, including attacks on soldiers and weapons smuggling. “The killing of Raed Saad, an arch-terrorist who worked day in and day out to violate the agreement and renew the fighting, was carried out in response to these violations and was intended to ensure the continuation of the ceasefire,” the Israeli official said.

The White House is also reportedly concerned about Israeli settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank, which it believes could hinder efforts to expand the Abraham Accords to countries like Saudi Arabia. A U.S. official emphasized the importance of de-escalation, stating, “The Trump administration is doing a lot of hard work to fix it. But if Netanyahu doesn’t want to take the steps that are needed to de-escalate, we are not going to waste our time trying to expand the Abraham Accords.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.