A parachute malfunction appears to have caused a humanitarian aid airdrop package to plummet to the earth, killing five Palestinians in Gaza — including two children. The incident occurred around 4:30 AM Eastern on Friday in the Al-Shati refugee camp in northern Gaza, where at least one parachute failed to deploy correctly. The Hamas-run Ministry of Health in Gaza confirmed the deaths to the Associated Press.
Video of the alleged incident shows at least one of the parachutes on an aid package becoming tangled, causing the large pallet of items to drop toward the earth much faster than the other parcels. At least eleven other people are believed to have been injured in the incident, ranging in age from 30 to 50 years old, in addition to the five fatalities. Various nations, including the US, Jordan, Egypt, France, the Netherlands, and Belgium, have dispatched aerial aid bundles in response to an escalating humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
The airdrop disaster comes amidst warnings from the United Nations about an impending famine in Gaza, home to approximately 2.3 million people. US officials have acknowledged that these airdrops fall short of tackling the full scale of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza but insisted the world would not stand idle as a famine unfolded in the war-torn region. This incident occurred a day after US President Biden announced plans for the military to establish a temporary seaport on the Mediterranean coast of Gaza to facilitate the importation of vital humanitarian aid.
🇵🇸🇮🇱 5 people in Gaza, including 2 children, died after parachutes malfunctioned on multiple aid packages.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Labour Party mayor obstructed a police raid to help her son hide a phone linked to the rape of a 15-year-old girl.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Naheed Ejaz, former Mayor of Bracknell, and her son, Diwan Khan.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on September 12, 2024, at their home in Bracknell, Berkshire, with Ejaz convicted of perverting the course of justice in February 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “A conspiracy of silence not to give the police the phone.” – Prosecutor Ed Wylde.
🎯IMPACT: Both Ejaz and Khan were found guilty of perverting the course of justice, with Khan also convicted of rape.
IN FULL
A Muslim former British Labour Party mayor has been found guilty of perverting the course of justice after helping her son conceal evidence related to his rape of a 15-year-old girl. Naheed Ejaz, 61, who served as mayor from 2023 to 2024, delayed police entry to her home for over 90 seconds on September 12, 2024, allowing her son, Diwan Khan, 41, to hide his mobile phone. The device reportedly contained video footage of the assault.
Khan was convicted at Winchester Crown Court of raping the teenager, which took place in June 2024. Prosecutors said he gave her vodka laced with the illicit drug, MDMA, causing her to black out. She awoke unclothed in the back of his car with no memory of the incident. Khan filmed the attack and later threatened to show the video to her mother and to “slit her throat” if she reported him.
During the police visit, Ejaz and Khan spoke in Urdu to avoid detection, and did not use the word “phone” as it is the same in both languages. Prosecutor Ed Wylde labelled the incident “A conspiracy of silence not to give the police the phone.”
Ejaz claimed the delay was only to wake her son so he could speak to officers. The court rejected this, ruling her actions were intentional obstruction.
Khan, who acted as his mother’s Mayor’s Consort during her term, admitted perverting the course of justice by hiding the phone but denied rape. He was convicted on the rape charge as well. Both Ejaz and Khan await sentencing following the trial.
The case comes amid broader concerns about child rape and child sexual exploitation in Britain involving Muslim asylum seekers and grooming gangs. Recent reviews have exposed police failures in handling grooming gang cases, including a National Crime Agency operation that led to reopening over 1,000 historic investigations due to overlooked evidence and improper closures.
Reports have noted disproportionate involvement of perpetrators from Pakistani backgrounds in some organized exploitation networks, alongside institutional reluctance to act over fears of racism accusations. In 2025, the police watchdog admitted senior officers failed to protect victims in Rotherham, while a government advisory panel for grooming gang inquiries was disbanded in early 2026, prompting criticism from survivors.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration repealed the 2009 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) endangerment finding, which linked greenhouse gases to climate change and served as the foundation for numerous federal climate regulations.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, environmental groups, and state leaders such as California Governor Gavin Newsom and Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on Thursday at a White House event.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This determination had no basis in fact, had none whatsoever, and it had no basis in law. On the contrary, over the generations, fossil fuels have saved millions of lives and lifted billions of people out of poverty and all over the world,” said President Donald Trump.
🎯IMPACT: The rollback eliminates key limits on greenhouse gas emissions, potentially increasing pollution and sparking legal challenges from environmental groups and state leaders.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump, alongside Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin, announced the repeal of the former Obama government’s onerous 2009 EPA endangerment finding, a regulation that tied greenhouse gases to climate change. The decision effectively dismantles the legal foundation for many federal climate policies, including vehicle emission standards and methane emission rules.
The National Pulse reported last July that the EPA revealed it intended to rescind the 2009 endangerment finding. At the time, Zeldin characterized the move as “basically drive a dagger into the heart of the climate change religion.”
Trump described the policy as “a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and massively drove up prices for American consumers.” He asserted the move would “eliminate over $1.3 trillion of regulatory cost and help bring car prices tumbling down dramatically.”
EPA Administrator Zeldin called the repeal “the single largest act of deregulation in the history of the United States.” He criticized the 2009 finding as an “ideological crusade” that led to “trillions of dollars in regulations” and “strangled entire sectors of the United States economy, including the American auto industry.”
The Trump White House is billing the policy move as part of its deregulation agenda, which aims to reduce government barriers faced by American manufacturers and lower consumer costs. However, radical environmentalist groups and Democrat lawmakers are condemning the repeal.
In a joint statement, Governors Gavin Newsom (D-CA) and Tony Evers (D-WI) wrote, “This action is unlawful, ignores basic science, and denies reality. We know greenhouse gases cause climate change and endanger our communities and our health — and we will not stop fighting to protect the American people from pollution.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction against Secretary of War Pete Hegseth in a lawsuit brought by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) over alleged retaliation for political speech stemming from Kelly’s appearance in a video alongside other Democrat lawmakers, where they encouraged military service members to reject “illegal orders.”
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sen. Mark Kelly, Sec. Pete Hegseth, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon, and federal prosecutors.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The injunction was issued on February 12, 2026, in Washington, D.C., following Kelly’s January lawsuit.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This Court has all it needs to conclude that Defendants have trampled on Senator Kelly’s First Amendment freedoms,” wrote Judge Richard Leon.
🎯IMPACT: The ruling prevents immediate action by the Department of War against Kelly while the case proceeds.
IN FULL
A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has granted a preliminary injunction against Secretary of War Pete Hegseth in a lawsuit filed by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ), who accused the Secretary of retaliating against him for political speech. Kelly, a former Navy Captain and current Arizona Democrat lawmaker, filed the lawsuit in January after Hegseth moved to censure him under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for appearing in a video encouraging U.S. service members to refuse “illegal orders.”
“Our rules are clear. You can refuse illegal orders,” Kelly stated in the video, which featured several Democratic lawmakers and was released amid U.S. military strikes against drug traffickers in the Caribbean. Hegseth called Kelly’s remarks “seditious” and initiated a review of his retirement grade, which could lead to a reduction in rank and retirement pay.
Kelly’s legal team argued that Hegseth’s actions were unconstitutional. “The First Amendment forbids the government and its officials from punishing disfavored expression or retaliating against protected speech,” the lawsuit stated. U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon, a Bush appointee, agreed, writing that the defendants had “trampled on Senator Kelly’s First Amendment freedoms and threatened the constitutional liberties of millions of military retirees.”
Notably, retired U.S. military service members are—in most cases—still subject to the UCMJ. The Department of War has consistently argued that Judge Leon lacks jurisdiction to hear the case, as Sen. Kelly has not exhausted his avenues of appeal within the military.
The video, released last November, drew sharp criticism from President Donald J. Trump, who labeled it “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” in a post on Truth Social. President Trump also called for the arrest and trial of the lawmakers involved, all of whom have military or intelligence backgrounds. The National Pulse reported on Wednesday that federal prosecutors sought to charge the lawmakers, but a grand jury in Washington, D.C., declined to indict them.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. authorities have seized over 134 acres in Texas used by the Gulf Cartel for smuggling activities.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the Gulf Cartel, and law enforcement officers.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Near Rio Grande City, Texas, as announced on February 10, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We took the land and everything on it. They thought they were untouchable. They were wrong.” – Customs and Border Protection
🎯IMPACT: The seizure disrupts cartel operations and sends a strong message about U.S. efforts to dismantle smuggling networks.
IN FULL
An estimated 134 acres of land in Texas, previously used by the Gulf Cartel for smuggling activities, have been seized by U.S. authorities. “We took the land and everything on it. They thought they were untouchable. They were wrong,” U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced earlier this week, sharing a video that showed law enforcement arresting individuals linked to the cartel.
The Gulf Cartel, a Mexican drug trafficking organization, has been involved in smuggling arms, illegal drugs, and illegal immigrants into the United States, as well as kidnapping and murdering American citizens. The cartel also exploits U.S. lands to grow marijuana, taking advantage of sanctuary state policies and tribal land sovereignty.
“You think this is just about arrests? It’s not. We are dismantling your operations from the ground up. We’re cutting out your safe houses, your staging areas, your corridors. This is your warning,” CBP said in a direct message to the cartels. Over the past year, authorities have seized multiple cartel-linked assets, including properties and financial resources.
🚨 CARTEL PROPERTY SEIZED 🚨
Over 134 acres near Rio Grande City, TX—used by a drug cartel for smuggling—is now out of their hands. We didn’t just make arrests; we took the land and everything on it.
Meanwhile, U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) has proposed the Cartel Marque and Reprisal Authorization Act, which would allow private U.S. operators to seize cartel assets under government-issued letters of marque. Lee stated, “The Constitution provides for Letters of Marque and Reprisal as a tool against the enemies of the United States. Cartels have replaced corsairs in the modern era, but we can still give private American citizens and their businesses a stake in the fight against these murderous foreign criminals.”
In January, President Trump emphasized plans to launch strikes targeting cartels in Mexico. Additionally, Mexico recently transferred 37 cartel members to U.S. authorities under pressure from the Trump administration. Notably, CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott testified on Capitol Hill on Tuesday that securing the border and enforcing immigration laws directly impacts cartels’ ability to profit from illegal activities, stating, “Breaking this cycle requires certainty of consequences and complete border security.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A new inspector general’s report accuses the former Biden government of bypassing federal procurement rules in awarding a $529 million no-bid contract to Family Endeavors Inc.—after it had hired a former Biden staffer—in 2021.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Administration of Children and Families (ACF), Family Endeavors Inc., and Andrew Lorenzen-Strait, a former Biden transition team advisor.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: March 2021, Pecos, Texas, for the establishment of an emergency intake site for unaccompanied minors.
💬KEY QUOTE: “ACF failed to reasonably conduct the necessary advanced planning to execute a contract for procurement of those beds and related services using full and open competition.” – Inspector General’s Report
🎯IMPACT: The contract’s value more than tripled after 15 modifications, raising concerns about federal oversight and fiscal responsibility.
IN FULL
The former Biden government is being accused of having circumvented federal procurement rules in awarding a $529 million no-bid contract to Family Endeavors Inc. in March 2021. According to a newly released inspector general’s report, the contract was intended to establish and manage a 2,000-bed emergency intake site in Pecos, Texas, for unaccompanied minors, but, concerningly, Family Endeavors Inc. had brought a former Biden government staffer on board to secure the contract just months before it was approved.
Just two months before the contract was issued by the Administration of Children and Families (ACF), part of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Family Endeavors Inc. hired Andrew Lorenzen-Strait, a former Biden transition team advisor. Concerningly, in an undercover video, Lorenzen-Strait referred to the Endeavors contract as a “corrupt bargain” and discussed brokering other deals.
In the undercover video, Lorenzen-Strait also jokes about being golf buddies with Hunter Biden. In addition, he explains how he secured federal contracts for a number of clients despite the companies and non-profit groups lacking adequate experience or capabilities to win bids in a truly competitive environment.
Despite the inspector general’s allegations, the ACF—at the time—cited the COVID-19 emergency as the reason for the no-bid contract. However, the inspector general’s report concluded that the lack of competitive bidding resulted from “insufficient planning” rather than the cited emergency. The contract price was more than double the agency’s initial cost estimate of $244 million, and subsequent modifications increased the value to over three times the original estimate.
“ACF failed to reasonably conduct the necessary advanced planning to execute a contract for procurement of those beds and related services using full and open competition,” the report stated, adding: “ACF knew well in advance of March 2021 that it was projected to need more shelter beds than existing sites could provide and should have begun contract planning at that time.”
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Gail Slater, the Assistant Attorney General for the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division, made the shock announcement on Thursday that she is stepping down from her role in the Trump administration.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Gail Slater and the U.S. Department of Justice.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Thursday, February 12, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “It is with great sadness and abiding hope that I leave my role as AAG for Antitrust today. It was indeed the honor of a lifetime to serve in this role.” — Gail Slater
🎯IMPACT: Slater, a key figure in the burgeoning populist antitrust legal movement, did not specify why she was leaving the DOJ.
IN FULL
Gail Slater, the Assistant Attorney General for the Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division, made the shock announcement on Thursday that she is stepping down from her role in the Trump administration. Slater, a key figure in the burgeoning populist antitrust legal movement, did not specify why she was leaving the DOJ.
“It is with great sadness and abiding hope that I leave my role as AAG for Antitrust today. It was indeed the honor of a lifetime to serve in this role,” Slater wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday. She added, “Huge thanks to all who supported me this past year, most especially the men and women of [the Department of Justice Antitrust Division].”
The National Pulse reported in June of last year that Slater’s Antitrust Division secured a historic antitrust jury verdict against a home healthcare executive over a wage-fixing scheme in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The case marked a significant legal landmark for the DOJ, affirming its legal authority to pursue criminal charges against figures accused of wage-fixing and labor market collusion.
Additionally, Slater oversaw Trump administration efforts in federal court to compel Google to divest from its Chrome web browser. While ultimately unsuccessful on the divestment question, the DOJ Antitrust Division secured a number of remedies against Google, including a prohibition on the company entering into any exclusive or otherwise anticompetitive contracts.
Still, Slater’s success at the DOJ was not without its detractors. The National Pulse reported last July that two of Slater’s top aides, Roger Alford and Bill Rinner, were fired in what appeared to be an effort by corporate interests to undermine Slater’s mission. “What if I told you this was happening because greedy, fake-MAGA world grifters and lobbyists are upset that the antitrust team was actually doing their job instead of taking cash from big corporates to turn a blind eye to monopolistic practices?” The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter) at the time.
Notably, these concerns were later echoed by Alford, who warned that while some DOJ officials like his former superior, Gail Slater, uphold MAGA values and the rule of law, there are also “MAGA-in-name-only lobbyists and… DOJ officials enabling them… pursuing a different agenda.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is blasting New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill (D) for proposing an online portal to track U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Governor Mikie Sherrill, DHS, and ICE.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Gov. Sherrill announced the portal on Wednesday, February 11, 2026.
🎯IMPACT: DHS warned that Sherrill’s approach endangers public safety and ICE officers, citing a rise in violence against agents.
IN FULL
New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill‘s (D) announcement that her administration has launched an online portal designed to track U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents is receiving strong pushback from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). On Wednesday, Sherrill stated, “We are going to be standing up a portal, so people can upload all their cell videos and alert people,” further adding, “If you see an ICE agent in the street, get your phone out, we want to know.”
The decision by the New Jersey governor to move forward with the anti-ICE portal has drawn condemnation from the DHS, which asserted, “This certainly looks like obstruction of justice.” A spokesman for the federal department added, “This action by the Governor encourages violence against our officers and obstruction of our operations.”
According to the DHS, ICE officers continue to be the subject of violent assaults by anti-ICE agitators and other radical leftists, having seen a 1,300 percent increase in attacks since the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement operations began. “ICE law enforcement would not have to be in the field in New Jersey if we had state and local cooperation. Governor Sherrill is not letting that happen, which puts New Jerseyans in danger,” a DHS spokesman said, while pointing to the recent arrests of illegal immigrants in New Jersey, including individuals convicted of crimes such as rape, homicide, and child molestation.
In defense of the ICE tracking portal, Gov. Sherrill repeated the unfounded claim that ICE agents are “disappearing” people—including American citizens—from the streets. “They will pick people up. They will not tell us who they are. They will not tell us if they’re here legally. They won’t check. They’ll pick up American citizens,” Sherrill said.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Federal immigration officers will begin drawing down their presence in Minnesota following a surge operation announced last month.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: White House Border Czar Tom Homan, President Donald J. Trump, Governor Tim Walz (D-MN), and federal law enforcement officials.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Minnesota, with the drawdown set to occur next week; announcement made on February 12, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I have proposed, and President Trump has concurred, that this surge operation conclude.” – Tom Homan
🎯IMPACT: Over 4,000 arrests connected to the operation have been reported, with a significant reduction in personnel planned.
IN FULL
White House Border Czar Tom Homan announced on Thursday that the surge of federal immigration officers in Minnesota is coming to an end, with a drawdown set to occur over the course of next week. Homan stated, “I have proposed, and President Trump has concurred, that this surge operation conclude.”
Late last month, Homan—who was dispatched by the Trump White House to take Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota—announced that he had reached an agreement with state officials who committed to ensuring that Minnesota county jails will now notify ICE agents as to the release dates for migrants deemed “criminal public safety risks.” The Border Czar stated that the Trump administration would begin drawing down the number of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Minnesota as a result.
Subsequently, on February 4, Homan announced that federal authorities would begin “drawing down” 700 law enforcement personnel in Minnesota, leaving approximately 2,000 agents in the state—still a significant increase from the 150 agents present before the surge. Homan emphasized that the full drawdown would depend on the cessation of illegal and threatening activities targeting ICE and its federal partners.
The National Pulse reported earlier this week that Governor Tim Walz (D-MN) stated he anticipated Operation Metro Surge would last “days, not weeks and months.” Meanwhile, White House officials have reported that at least 4,000 arrests in Minnesota have been connected to the federal operation.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Reform Party leader Nigel Farage has backed comments by Manchester United owner and industrial tycoon Sir Jim Ratcliffe about immigration and its impact on Britain.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage and Jim Ratcliffe.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Farage made his comments in a video statement published online on Thursday.
💬KEY QUOTE: “[L]ook at parts of London, for example, where the road names and underground signs aren’t just in English—they’re in a foreign language as well. One million people living in this country don’t speak any English at all. Four million people living in this country barely speak passable English. And that’s the point he was making: that big areas of our towns and cities have been changed into something completely different to what they were, and that it’s all making us poorer.” – Nigel Farage
🎯IMPACT: Ratcliffe’s comments and Farage’s endorsement of them showcase the growing importance of mass migration and its consequences in Britain’s political discourse.
IN FULL
Reform Party leader Nigel Farage has endorsed British billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s recent remarks on mass migration, insisting the INEOS founder and Manchester United co-owner is correct in highlighting the pressures on the country’s resources and identity. Sir Jim stated in a recent interview that Britain “has been colonized by immigrants,” arguing that the nation cannot sustain “an economy with nine million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in.”
In a video statement released on Thursday morning, Farage backed the Tycoon, saying, “What he said [is] that our population has gone up from 58 million to 70 million and that with nine million people of working age on benefits, we don’t need mass migration. He said much of the country had been colonized by immigrants.”
Addressing backlash from Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and other liberals over the use of the word “colonized,” Farage said, “Now, that word was a controversial word, and he said, ‘OK, if you don’t like the word, we’ll tone it down.’ But just think about this: You ask yourself why public services have diminished. You ask yourself why rents have gone through the roof. The population explosion has done that.”
Farage pointed to the many visible changes in Britain’s urban areas, noting “parts of London, for example, where the road names, the Underground signs aren’t just in English, they’re in a foreign language as well. One million people living in this country don’t speak any English at all. Four million people living in this country barely speak passable English.”
He argued these shifts have fundamentally altered communities, “that big areas of our towns and cities have been changed into something completely different to what they were. And that it’s all making us poorer.”
Farage rejected the criticism of Sir Jim from the Prime Minister and corporate media outlets, declaring: “I don’t really care if Number 10 is in uproar or if much of mainstream media find his comments too difficult. I believe firmly that Jim Ratcliffe is right.”
YouGov tracking shows 69 percent of Britons believe immigration levels over the last ten years have been too high, with a mere four percent saying they have been too low and just 17 percent viewing them as about right, indicating broad public alignment with concerns raised by Ratcliffe and Farage.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has confirmed the agency’s involvement in World Cup security.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons, Representative Nellie Pou (D-NJ), and FIFA officials.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The World Cup is scheduled across North America this summer.
💬KEY QUOTE: “ICE is dedicated to ensuring that everyone that visits the facilities will have a safe and secure event.” – Todd Lyons.
🎯IMPACT: ICE will not suspend immigration enforcement during the soccer tournament, as Democrats have requested.
IN FULL
Acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director Todd Lyons told lawmakers during a congressional hearing that the agency will play a visible role in security for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, stating that ICE is “a key part of the overall security apparatus for the World Cup.” His remarks came in response to questions about whether the agency would suspend enforcement operations during the tournament.
Lyons said ICE is committed to helping secure the tournament and ensuring the safety of those attending, saying, “ICE is dedicated to ensuring that everyone who visits the facilities will have a safe and secure event.” The United States will host 78 matches across 11 cities, while co-hosts Canada and Mexico will each stage 13 games.
The hearing followed controversy surrounding ICE operations in Minneapolis, in which anti-ICE activists Alex Pretti and Renee Good were shot and killed during confrontations with federal agents. The incidents, part of a broader immigration crackdown under President Donald J. Trump, prompted protests from coordinated leftist agitators and the deployment of approximately 3,000 agents to the city.
ICE’s role at major sporting events has been under scrutiny beyond the World Cup. In contrast to its planned participation in World Cup security, the agency previously indicated it would not conduct immigration enforcement operations at the Super Bowl, even as it supported broader security efforts coordinated by the Department of Homeland Security.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.