Monday, August 10, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DOGE Appears to Have Slashed Its Savings Target by 92%.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Elon Musk initially claimed he could reduce the federal budget by $2 trillion during Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign. Once appointed to front the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk revised his target to $1 trillion, but recent statements have scaled back the expected savings further to $150 billion for fiscal year 2026.

👥 Who’s Involved: Elon Musk, President Donald J. Trump, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

📍 Where & When: White House cabinet meeting on April 10, Washington, D.C., addressing fiscal year 2026 (October 2025 – September 2026).

💬 Key Quote: “I’m excited to announce that we anticipate savings in ’26 from reduction of waste and fraud by $150 billion,” Musk said.

⚠️ Impact: Musk’s revised savings projection is prompting skepticism, with critics doubting the feasibility of ever cutting $1 trillion. DOGE’s method of accounting for savings has also been criticized due to errors and inaccuracies.

IN FULL:

Details from an April 10 White House cabinet meeting indicate Elon Musk moderated his ambitious budget reduction goals. Musk had promised substantial cuts to the federal budget, initially aiming for a reduction of $2 trillion. Subsequent revisions saw expectations reduced to $1 trillion upon Musk’s appointment to front the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

However, at the April cabinet meeting, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO further reduced his expectations, citing $150 billion in anticipated savings from cutting waste and fraud for fiscal year 2026. In perspective, this represents a 92 percent reduction from the originally promised cuts to the budget spanning from October 2025 to September 2026.

“I’m excited to announce that we anticipate savings in ’26 from reduction of waste and fraud by $150 billion,” Musk said.

Musk’s newest budget cut target reflects data from the DOGE website, which currently amounts to the cited $150 billion in savings—though it is unclear whether the number is a hard ceiling for Musk and his team. The Trump White House maintains that the original $1 trillion in cuts remains the administration’s goal.

Notably, Musk’s cabinet meeting presentation was unusually brief, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth instead commencing the session—suggesting a possible shift to national security concerns as the administration’s top priority. Musk did insist that the federal government is a “target-rich environment” with inefficiencies being identified across agencies.

Despite its efforts, DOGE’s online platform has faced claims that its data is inaccurate and either miscounts or incorrectly attributes savings. These allegations have increased skepticism among both DOGE’s supporters and critics regarding the feasibility of the ambitious budget cuts.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Afghan Migrant Who Raped a Child After Falsely Claiming to Be a Minor Sentenced.

An Afghan man who posed as a 14-year-old boy on Snapchat to groom and rape a 13-year-old girl in Nottingham, England, has been jailed.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Abdul Khan, an Afghan asylum seeker believed to be 28, was sentenced to nine and a half years in prison at Nottingham Crown Court after being convicted of grooming and twice raping a 13-year-old girl. He will theoretically be subject to automatic deportation to Afghanistan after serving two-thirds of his term, but the British government does not currently return Afghans to their homeland, even if they are subject to deportation orders.
📺 DETAIL: Khan arrived in Britain hidden in the back of a truck in 2015 and claimed a false date of birth in his asylum application. Using the name “Abs” on Snapchat, he pretended to be a 14-year-old boy and exchanged sexual messages with the victim. He arranged to meet her after school on May 14, 2025, took her to a nature reserve, and raped her twice. He was already serving a 23-month sentence for sexual communication with another child in Derbyshire. A jury convicted him after a four-day trial of two counts of rape, sexual activity with a child, sexual communication with a child, meeting a child following grooming, and perverting the course of justice. DNA evidence linked him to the crime. When the girl realized he was older, he claimed to be 16. The victim’s personal impact statement described her as feeling “numb,” “scared of the world,” and suffering flashbacks of his face, and unable to trust anyone.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “You deliberately concealed your true identity. She thought she was communicating with a child of her own age. It was a lie you have persisted with throughout these proceedings… She has on any view been profoundly affected, as her parents must also have been. Your sentence will mean automatic deportation.” – Judge Mark Watson.
🎯 IMPACT: The case highlights the risk posed to the public by illegal migrants, who often arrive without papers, falsely claim to be minors, and lodge bogus asylum claims, after which they are provided with taxpayer-funded accommodation and left at large while those claims are processed. Khan’s victim has been left with lasting psychological trauma.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

An Afghan man who posed as a 14-year-old boy on Snapchat to groom and rape a 13-year-old girl in Nottingham, England, has been jailed.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Migrant ‘Mega Dinghy’ Transports Record 230 Migrants to Britain.

A record-breaking mega dinghy carrying 230 illegal migrants reached Britain overnight as weekend Channel crossings topped 950, prompting Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage to warn that daily arrivals could soon reach into the thousands.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A single mega dinghy carrying a record 230 illegal migrants crossed the English Channel to Britain overnight. More than 950 boat migrants reached Dover over the weekend overall.
📺 DETAIL: The vessel broke the previous single-boat record of 165 and is large enough to hold roughly the same number of people as a Boeing 737. Calmer seas after a recent pause in arrivals allowed people smugglers to recommence launching boats from the French coast. Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage described the crossing as further evidence of an illegal invasion that constitutes a national security emergency. In response, Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s Labour Party government pointed to a new payment-by-results deal with France that will put 40 percent more officers on French beaches, but hundreds of millions of pounds have been paid to the French authorities over several years, and the country’s police are still regularly caught standing by while migrant boats are launched without intervening.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This is a record number in a single vessel. It’s yet more proof that this illegal invasion is a national security emergency,” said Nigel Farage, adding: “I have to say, I just find the sheer levels of inaction from both this and the previous Government… they confront these huge issues and they appear to be incapable of doing anything to solve the problems.”
🎯 IMPACT: The new single-vessel record and the surge of more than 950 arrivals in a single weekend underscore the government’s continued failure to deter crossings despite claims of progress. Farage’s warning that Britain could soon see thousands of illegal migrants arriving daily highlights the scale of the challenge if current trends continue. The Home Office’s emphasis on cooperation with France and reduced overall numbers this year has done little to quell criticism that the underlying pull factors remain unaddressed, leaving coastal communities and national security exposed to ever-larger vessels operated by criminal gangs.

Image by Acabashi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A record-breaking mega dinghy carrying 230 illegal migrants reached Britain overnight as weekend Channel crossings topped 950, prompting Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage to warn that daily arrivals could soon reach into the thousands.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Police Arrest Local People for Protesting Illegal Immigrants Being Housed Among Them.

The British government’s unannounced placement of migrants in Thetford, England, sparked protests, resulting in a police response and arrests.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Protests have erupted in Thetford, a market town in Norfolk, England, after migrant men were placed in free housing without prior notice to the local residents.
📺 DETAIL: The protests spanned several nights and resulted in property damage, clashes with police, and the arrest of five people. The charges included public order offenses and suspicion of racial hatred. The protests began on Tuesday after it was revealed that a property on a family estate near a primary school had been converted into a house of multiple occupancy (HMO) for illegal migrants. An HMO is a house occupied by at least three people who are not from the same family or household but share basic facilities. This coincided with news that the British government intended to use a nearby military base to house 3,750 migrants. In response to the protests, the police escorted five hooded males out of the property. The police’s response was criticized as heavy-handed while police officials rejected the characterization, stating their response was necessary to maintain order. “There were some skirmishes, it was a spirited protest but I didn’t see any violence… We fully support their right to protest. I’d encourage people to protest peacefully and most of what I saw yesterday was peaceful,” said local Reform UK councillor Scott Hussey.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I don’t know what people in the government actually expect. If you put these illegal immigrants into houses in the middle of housing estates, close to schools, next door to people, into communities who have absolutely no say in it, then I think it’s a pretty reasonable expectation that the people there will not be happy about it and will want to make a fuss. The fact is we’re getting about a thousand-a-week of these people coming in on small boats and we’re running out of places to put them.” – Colin Sutton, Norfolk Police and Crime Commissioner.
🎯 IMPACT: The recent unrest highlights growing public frustrations over the British government’s migrant placement policies. This is just one of several protests of its kind to take place across the country. The fact that the migrants had to be escorted out of the building underscores the scale of public anger. The revelation that the decision was unannounced suggests that the government is aware that its placement policies are unpopular but cannot or will not change them. This further shows the extent of immigration the country has received in recent years.
📺 FLASHBACK: Back in July, Sutton was elected as Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk in the first election victory of its kind for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party.

Image by Bob Bob.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The British government's unannounced placement of migrants in Thetford, England, sparked protests, resulting in a police response and arrests.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Islamic Society Files Lawsuit Against City for Blocking Mosque Construction.

The Islamic Society of Tulsa has filed a federal lawsuit against Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, alleging religious discrimination after the city council denied its request to build a mosque and community center.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Islamic Society of Tulsa has filed a federal lawsuit against the City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, and four city council members after officials denied its request to build a mosque and Islamic community center, alleging the decision violated the U.S. Constitution, the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, and Oklahoma law by allegedly discriminating against Muslims. The city declined to comment on the lawsuit but confirmed the U.S. Department of Justice has opened an investigation into whether the denial violated federal religious land-use protections.
📺 DETAIL: According to the complaint, the Islamic Society purchased about 15 acres in Broken Arrow in 2014 to build a mosque, a community center, and a commercial development, with both city planning staff and the Planning Commission recommending approval. Despite those recommendations, the City Council voted 4–1 in January to reject the rezoning request and conditional use permit. The lawsuit alleges the council’s decision followed opposition from residents and local politicians and claims the city approved comparable rezoning requests for Christian churches and commercial developments while allowing those applicants to resolve traffic and engineering issues after approval. The Islamic Society is seeking a court order allowing the project to proceed, a declaration that the city’s actions were unlawful, and monetary damages, including attorneys’ fees. Meanwhile, Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond has urged the Trump administration to halt the DOJ investigation, calling it federal overreach and arguing that land-use decisions should remain under state and local control.
🎯 IMPACT: The lawsuit seeks a court order to allow the project to proceed, a declaration of the city’s actions as unlawful, and monetary damages, including attorneys’ fees. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice has reportedly launched a civil rights investigation into whether Broken Arrow violated federal religious land-use protections.

Image by Don Sniegowski.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Islamic Society of Tulsa has filed a federal lawsuit against Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, alleging religious discrimination after the city council denied its request to build a mosque and community center.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Documents Reveal Details of FBI’s Secret ‘Oxferd Comma’ Probe Trying to Tie Trump to Russia.

More details are emerging on how the FBI investigated whether President Trump acted under Russian influence following his dismissal of former FBI Director James Comey in 2017.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The White House has released documents showing the FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation, codenamed Oxferd Comma [sic], after President Donald J. Trump fired FBI Director James Comey in May 2017, to determine whether the America First leader was acting on behalf of or under the influence of Russia or had obstructed an ongoing investigation. According to an FBI memo dated May 16, 2017, investigators examined whether Trump was directed, controlled, or coordinated by the Russian government in a manner that threatened U.S. national security or violated federal law.
📺 DETAIL: The memo cited information from the discredited Crossfire Hurricane investigation, Trump’s interactions with Comey, discussions about the Republican Party’s 2016 platform on Ukraine, and alleged business ties to Russia as factors supporting the inquiry. While the FBI said the circumstances surrounding Comey’s firing could support an inference that the Russia investigation influenced Trump’s decision, the opening of the case did not mean the allegations had been substantiated. Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s 2019 investigation ultimately found no established coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, while declining to reach a prosecutorial decision on obstruction. A 2023 report by Special Counsel John Durham concluded the FBI was biased and lacked sufficient evidentiary support to open the full Crossfire Hurricane investigation, and a separate 2019 Justice Department inspector general review found significant errors in surveillance applications targeting former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The White House release identifies the investigation’s codename as “Oxferd Comma,” a misspelling of “Oxford Comma,” and former acting Assistant Attorney General Jeff Clark said a document expert believed a character in “Comma” was the number zero rather than the letter “o,” speculating the spelling may have been intended to make the records more difficult to locate through Freedom of Information Act searches.
📺 FLASHBACK: Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI’s 2016 investigation into Trump campaign ties to Russia, was criticized in 2023 by Special Counsel John Durham, who concluded it lacked sufficient evidence to justify its launch.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

More details are emerging on how the FBI investigated whether President Trump acted under Russian influence following his dismissal of former FBI Director James Comey in 2017.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DOJ Finds Duke Law Kept Discriminating Against White Applicants Despite SCOTUS Ruling.

The Department of Justice has concluded that Duke University School of Law violated federal law by using race-based admissions practices, even after the Supreme Court struck down such policies.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has concluded that Duke University School of Law intentionally discriminated against white and Asian applicants based on race.
📺 DETAIL: The DOJ announced on Thursday that Duke University School of Law had given preferential treatment to black and Hispanic candidates during the admissions process. This violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which barred race-conscious college admissions. The discrimination took place between 2023 and 2025. According to internal documents and admissions data uncovered by the DOJ, Duke showed an intent “to discriminate against all racial groups except black and Hispanic applicants, to accept more black and Hispanic applicants.” The university used various mechanisms, such as “diversity” essay questions and other proxies for race to advance its diversity goals, which were consciously disguised as race-neutral measures according to internal communications. “As a result of these practices, highly qualified white, Asian, and other students were denied admission on the basis of their race,” the DOJ said. The investigation also uncovered disparities in LSAT scores, with admitted black applicants that scored significantly lower than rejected white and Asian applicants. In 2025, the median score of an admitted black applicant was 166, while the median score for both white and Asian applicants was 173. The DOJ’s investigation found that a black applicant was roughly 3.5 times more likely to be admitted than an Asian applicant with similar credentials.
💬 KEY QUOTE:Duke Law School doesn’t get a free pass to discriminate against white and Asian students simply because it thinks it has good intentions… Using ‘diversity’ essay questions to identify preferred races for admission is still illegal discrimination based on race, and this Department is committed to eliminating it everywhere we find it, including in our nation’s law schools.” – Harmeet K. Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General
🎯 IMPACT: The DOJ is seeking a voluntary resolution agreement with Duke to bring its admissions practices into compliance with federal law. The DOJ may pursue enforcement through the courts if the university refuses to comply. This represents another front in President Donald J. Trump’s crackdown on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies.

Image by Billy Wilson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Justice has concluded that Duke University School of Law violated federal law by using race-based admissions practices, even after the Supreme Court struck down such policies.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Mother and Two Transgenders Charged in Murder of Mentally Handicapped Boy.

The mother of a seven-year-old boy and two transgenders face murder charges he was found dead following months of alleged abuse.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A mother and two transgenders have been charged with murder and child endangerment in the death of seven-year-old William Evans in Hamilton County, Ohio, after prosecutors alleged the boy endured months of severe abuse. The defendants, identified as the boy’s mother, Kaitlin Evans, 39, along with Nessa Keaney, 23, and Kirby Rankin, 33, appeared in court Friday, where prosecutors said the child was found bound with duct tape inside a closet. He had suffered extensive injuries, including blunt-force trauma, burns, and evidence of “water torture.”
📺 DETAIL: A detective called the case one of the most disturbing examples of child abuse” he had encountered in over 20 years of law enforcement. Prosecutors alleged the three adults were co-parenting the child, who was described as mentally disabled, and said Rankin admitted involvement in the abuse while implicating Evans and Keaney as active participants. Rankin’s attorneys requested a competency evaluation, citing documented mental health issues, and a judge scheduled a hearing on the evaluation for September 4. Bond was set at $1 million on the murder charge and $100,000 on the child endangerment charge for each defendant, with the case scheduled to be presented to a grand jury on August 17.
🎯 IMPACT: The case has raised questions about the oversight of vulnerable children in the care of transgenders, and is just the latest case of children seriously abused by people claiming to be the opposite sex. Legal proceedings are ongoing, with further details are expected to emerge at trial.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The mother of a seven-year-old boy and two transgenders face murder charges he was found dead following months of alleged abuse.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Migrants Heading for Britain Swarm French Trains to Reach New Coastal Launch Sites.

Migrant crossings to Britain are expected to rise as smugglers adapt their tactics, and favorable weather conditions persist in the English Channel.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Hundreds of migrants have reportedly been seen traveling by trains and buses from Calais and Dunkirk along France’s northern coastline, where people-smuggling gangs have increasingly launched small boats towards Britain from further and further away to avoid heightened enforcement along traditional crossing routes.
📺 DETAIL: Migrants are reportedly able to travel in large groups without ticket checks or intervention from French authorities frequently, and favorable weather conditions could lead to another wave of Channel crossings in the coming days. Smuggling networks have also expanded their operations by using larger inflatable boats capable of carrying more than 150 migrants. The developments come as the British Labour government’s “one-in, one-out” migrant return agreement with France faces scrutiny after reports that nearly 50 migrants returned under the scheme have since re-entered Britain. Home Office figures show that 1,087 migrants were returned across the English Channel between August 4 last year and June 30, representing four percent of the 27,920 people who crossed the Channel illegally during the same period. A larger number were sent to Britain from France, for an overall net increase in migrants.
🎯 IMPACT: The ongoing crossings strain is straining border resources, highlighting the limitations of the Labour government’s current policies. New Prime Minister Andy Burnham insists there has been a decrease in crossings compared to previous years, but he has had to acknowledge the need for more action, as over 2,000 migrants crossed in just two weeks after he took office.
📺 FLASHBACK: The “one-in, one-out” deportation deal was introduced to deter illegal crossings, but appears to have comprehensively failed, as it only covers a small number of migrants, more migrants are being sent across the Channel than are returned, and dozens of returnees have simply come back to Britain on another boat.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Migrant crossings to Britain are expected to rise as smugglers adapt their tactics, and favorable weather conditions persist in the English Channel.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

State Fines Meta Over $560 Million for Impact on Children’s Mental Health.

A New Mexico judge has fined Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, $567 million for damaging children’s mental health with new mandates designed to regulate children’s access to social media.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A New Mexico state judge has ordered Meta to pay a $567 million fine for harm caused to children’s mental health by the company’s social media platforms.
📺 DETAIL: Judge Bryan Biedscheid’s 68-page ruling directed Meta to pay $420 million for treatment services for children, with the rest allocated to prevention and awareness initiatives. “The Court finds that the weight of the evidence presented demonstrates that Meta’s platforms are a cause of and substantial contributing factor to the youth mental health crisis in New Mexico,” wrote Judge Biedscheid. The court ordered Meta to delete the accounts of users under 13 and to disable push notifications for minors between 8 AM and 3 PM during the academic year and between 10 PM and 7 AM on normal days. The ruling requires that like counts remain hidden unless authorized by a parent. This follows a $375 million fine imposed on the company earlier this year for violations of New Mexico’s Unfair Practices Act, which prohibits deceptive business practices. “This case has always been about protecting children, standing up for families, and making sure that one of the world’s largest technology companies cannot profit from practices that endanger young people without consequence,” New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez (D) said in a statement. Meta is the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We remain confident in our record of protecting teens online and will continue to defend ourselves against claims that misrepresent the facts,” said Meta spokesman Andy Stone.
🎯 IMPACT: Meta plans to appeal the decision. Specifically, Meta maintains that it has already implemented measures to protect minors from harmful content. The ruling could set a precedent for holding tech companies accountable for their platforms’ effects on children’s mental health. This represents a wider push by governments across the West, such as the United Kingdom and the European Union, to regulate access to social media, allegedly to protect children.
📺 FLASHBACK: Back in June, Meta filed for a federal court contempt order against Israeli spyware firm NSO Group. Meta alleged that the Israeli spyware firm had violated a permanent injunction by targeting users on WhatsApp.

Image by Anthony Quintano.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A New Mexico judge has fined Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, $567 million for damaging children's mental health with new mandates designed to regulate children's access to social media.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Four Out of Five Cities With the Fastest Income Gains in America Are in Trump Country.

A new study has revealed that among the top five cities for rising median household income, four are in states that voted for President Donald J. Trump.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Four out of the five cities with the fastest rising incomes in America are in states that voted for President Donald J. Trump in 2024.
📺 DETAIL: According to a new study published on Thursday by SmartAsset, a personal finance site, the top five U.S. cities with the fastest rising incomes are in Nevada, California, and Florida. The top fives cities are Enterprise in Nevada, Anaheim in California, Henderson in Nevada, Tampa in Florida, and Port St. Lucie in Florida. Nevada and Florida voted for President Trump in 2024. Enterprise topped the survey. The city experienced an 18.3 percent increase in median household income in 2024. Anaheim experienced a 15.8 percent increase, Henderson experienced a 12.4 percent increase, Tampa experienced a 12.2 percent increase, and Port St. Lucie experienced an 11.8 percent increase. Enterprise, Nevada, saw its median household income increase from $93,905 in 2023 to $111,128 in 2024. The growth of all five cities exceeded the national wage growth average of four to five percent in 2024, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. “In many U.S. cities, median household income has outpaced inflation by a wide margin, offsetting the impact of rising costs… In others, however, residents are falling far enough behind to intensify the squeeze on household budgets,” noted the study, which focused on cities with a population of 250,000 or higher.
🎯 IMPACT: The surge in Nevada’s wages is attributed to the diversification of its economy. The state’s economy has historically relied on gambling. New high-paying jobs span software engineering, supply-chain management, and healthcare. While Anaheim, California, features in the top five, the state’s major cities collectively continue to grapple with significant affordability problems. The state’s affordability crisis has caused a collapse in its fertility rate. Meanwhile, on Monday, it was revealed that U.S. manufacturing had reached a four-year high, largely due to domestic production incentives, such as tariffs and tax reforms.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new study has revealed that among the top five cities for rising median household income, four are in states that voted for President Donald J. Trump.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.