After extensive pressure from Democratic lawmakers, the Republican-controlled House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic has published the full two-part transcribed interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci. The release comes one business day before the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director is set to testify before the subcommittee. It reveals that Fauci did not personally read grant applications he approved — including the application of EcoHealth Alliance, whose activities may very well be the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The interview, which initially in fragments surfaced in January, includes Fauci’s acknowledgment that the lab leak theory pertaining to the origins of COVID-19 is not a conspiracy theory and he lacks evidence for the six-foot social distancing mandate.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
Key revelations from the interviews include Fauci’s admission that he never personally read a research grant application before signing off on it. This includes the EcoHealth Alliance’s application with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has raised concerns regarding gain-of-function research potentially linked to the origins of COVID-19. Fauci also revealed his lack of knowledge about whether NIAID verifies the biosafety of foreign labs or if such grants undergo national security review.
An unnamed Biden regime official obstructed Fauci from answering whether he recommended travel restrictions during the pandemic, though Fauci stated he supported every travel restriction implemented under the Trump administration. This, according to the GOP majority, contradicts public portrayals of the restrictions as xenophobic.
Fauci, in support of COVID-19 vaccine mandates, suggested making life “difficult” for those refusing vaccination. However, he noted the necessity for social studies to ascertain if such mandates have counterproductive effects.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has lifted its total ban on reviewing asylum applications, though restrictions remain for around 40 countries.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: DHS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The pause was implemented in November 2025 following a deadly attack on the National Guard in Washington, D.C., by an Afghan national.
💬KEY QUOTE: “USCIS has lifted the adjudicative hold for thoroughly screened asylum seekers from non-high-risk countries.” – DHS spokesman.
🎯IMPACT: The move reallocates resources to focus on national security and public safety vetting for higher-risk cases.
IN FULL
The Trump administration has moved to lift the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) hold on reviewing asylum applications, though the department stresses that restrictions continue to remain in place for around 40 countries of particular national security concern. In November last year, President Donald J. Trump directed DHS to impose a pause on processing asylum claims after an Afghan national shot two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C., killing one.
At the time, then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem indicated the pause in reviews would be indefinite as the department worked through a backlog of nearly four million asylum cases. Importantly, the hold on reviews continues to apply to countries deemed “high risk,” including Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, and multiple African nations.
“USCIS has lifted the adjudicative hold for thoroughly screened asylum seekers from non-high-risk countries,” a DHS spokesman said on Monday, adding, “This move allows resources to focus on continued rigorous national security and public safety vetting for higher-risk cases.”
Importantly, other restrictions remain in effect, such as the pause on issuing immigrant visas to 75 countries and the halt of immigration applications from nations covered by President Trump’s travel ban. Late last year, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began a re-review of foreign nationals granted refugee status by the former Biden government, applying more rigorous scrutiny to the applicants. A number of these individuals have subsequently been referred to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for deportation.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The March 12 ramming attack by a Lebanese-American man targeting Michigan’s largest Jewish Reform synagogue was orchestrated by the Iran-backed Hezbollah terrorist group, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ayman Mohamad Ghazali, a 41-year-old Lebanese national and naturalized U.S. citizen; Ghazali’s brother, an alleged Hezbollah commander; and the Lebanese Islamist terrorist group Hezbollah.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The FBI revealed Ghazali’s ties to Hezbollah on Monday, March 30, 2026, following the March 12 attack.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This is the largest gathering place for Israelis in the State of Michigan in the United States. I have booby-trapped the car. I will forcefully enter and start shooting them. God willing, I will kill as many of them as I possibly can.” — Ayman Mohamad Ghazali in an alleged video taking credit for the attack
🎯IMPACT: Ghazali had lost several family members just days earlier in an Israeli airstrike in Lebanon, including his brother, who appears to have been a commander in Hezbollah.
IN FULL
The man who targeted the largest Jewish Reform synagogue in Michigan earlier this month was directed by the Iranian-backed Lebanese terror group Hezbollah, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Ayman Mohamad Ghazali, a 41-year-old Lebanese national and naturalized U.S. citizen, purposefully targeted the Jewish community when he drove his vehicle into Michigan’s largest synagogue and opened fire on March 12.
During a press conference, the FBI stated that Ghazali’s attack was motivated and directed by Hezbollah’s “militant ideology.” Jennifer Runyan, the FBI’s special agent in charge in Detroit, revealed that Ghazali recorded a video just before the attack in which he stated, “This is the largest gathering place for Israelis in the State of Michigan in the United States. I have booby-trapped the car. I will forcefully enter and start shooting them. God willing, I will kill as many of them as I possibly can.”
Ghazali, a resident of Dearborn Heights—which boasts a population of around 60,000 people, with 25 percent being of Arabic extraction—drove his Ford F-150 through the doors of the synagogue, the vehicle laden with commercial fireworks and gasoline. He subsequently exchanged gunfire with a security guard before fatally shooting himself.
The National Pulse previously reported that Ghazali had lost several family members just days earlier in an Israeli airstrike in Lebanon, including his brother, who appears to have been a commander in Hezbollah. In addition, the FBI noted that Ghazali had also watched footage of an Iranian fatwa calling for “total jihad against the U.S. military” shortly before carrying out the attack.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Legislation was introduced to ban illegalmigrants from accessing the American banking system.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) and U.S. financial institutions.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Introduced in 2025, targeting U.S. banking system.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Access to the American banking system is a privilege that should only be reserved for those who respect our laws and sovereignty.” – Senator Tom Cotton
🎯IMPACT: Aims to prevent illegal migrants from using financial institutions to remain in the U.S.
IN FULL
Senator Tom Cotton, representing Arkansas, has put forth the Know Your American Customer Act, a legislative proposal aimed at barring illegal migrants from participating in the American banking system.
The proposed act mandates that U.S. financial institutions verify the legal status of new customers, ensuring that American banks do not facilitate illegal migrants in violating U.S. laws.
In a letter addressed to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in 2025, Senator Cotton requested a review of the existing rules concerning illegal immigrant access to the U.S. banking system.
The act requires banks and credit unions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to confirm that anyone opening a new account is either a U.S. citizen, a permanent resident, or legally present with a valid visa, using identification such as a driver’s license or passport.
While the legislation would grandfather in existing clients, allowing them to maintain or open new accounts if they have an established relationship with their financial institution, it also criminalizes the act of illegal migrants opening or maintaining accounts, placing legal responsibility on individuals unless institutions fail to verify documentation in good faith.
The logic behind grandfathering in old accounts revolves around getting buy-in from the banking industry, which has objected to fronting the cost of finding existing illegal migrants in their systems.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Boston-based Black Lives Matter (BLM) activist Monica Cannon-Grant has been ordered to forfeit $224,063 by a federal judge to cover taxpayer dollars she stole through diverting donations from her nonprofit, collecting fraudulent pandemic unemployment benefits, and pocketing rental assistance.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Monica Cannon-Grant, U.S. District Court Judge Angel Kelley, and federal prosecutors.
📍WHEN & WHERE: March 2026, in Boston, Massachusetts.
🎯IMPACT: The forfeiture ruling, issued last week, is in addition to the $106,000 restitution payment ordered when Cannon-Grant was sentenced this past January to probation, home detention, and community service, with no prison time.
IN FULL
Boston-based Black Lives Matter (BLM) activist Monica Cannon-Grant has been ordered to forfeit $224,063 by U.S. District Court Judge Angel Kelley—a Joe Biden appointee—to cover taxpayer dollars she stole through diverting donations from her nonprofit, collecting fraudulent pandemic unemployment benefits, and pocketing rental assistance. The forfeiture ruling, issued last week, is in addition to the $106,000 restitution payment ordered when Cannon-Grant was sentenced this past January.
According to the federal court filing, the forfeiture amount includes approximately $181,000 in diverted donations from Violence in Boston Inc., the nonprofit she founded, over $33,000 in fraudulent pandemic unemployment benefits, and about $12,600 in rental assistance benefits. Federal prosecutors initially charged Cannon-Grant, along with her late husband Clark Grant, in March 2022 and detailed how the couple used the nonprofit’s funds and government assistance payments to finance expensive vacations and pay for extravagant dinners.
The federal charges against Clark Grant were dropped following his death in a motorcycle accident in May 2023. Meanwhile, Cannon-Grant pleaded guilty to the 18-count federal indictment in September 2025. Judge Kelley initially sentenced the BLM activist to probation, home detention, and community service, with no prison time.
Cannon-Grant, who founded the nonprofit Violence in Boston Inc. in 2017, expanded the organization by 2020 and became a well-known figure in Boston‘s progressive circles. She was recognized as Bostonian of the Year by The Boston Globe and as the city’s best social justice advocate by Boston Magazine. The BLM activist was the organizer behind a several-thousand-person protest in Boston after the death of George Floyd.
The National Pulse previously reported that now-former far-left Boston City Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson, a former illegal immigrant hailing from Cape Verde, was arrested in December 2024 on five counts of aiding and abetting wire fraud and theft from federally funded programs. Fernandes Anderson was found guilty and, in 2025, sentenced to one month in prison, three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay $13,000 in restitution.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Stephen K. Bannon called for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s son to be drafted into a possible invasion of Kharg Island.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Stephen K. Bannon, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Arab leaders.
📍WHEN & WHERE: March 30, 2026, during Bannon’s WarRoom show.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Let’s have him in the first wave.” – Stephen K. Bannon
🎯IMPACT: Bannon’s comments come as President Donald J. Trump has hinted at a possible amphibious invasion of Kharg Island, which has been pushed by neoconservatives like Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC).
IN FULL
Stephen K. Bannon, host of the WarRoom show and former White House Chief Strategist during President Donald J. Trump’s first administration, has called for the drafting of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s son and various Arab princes in the event of an amphibious invasion of Iran’s Kharg Island.
Kharg is Iran’s main oil export hub in the Persian Gulf, and Trump recently hinted at the possibility of seizing it to The Financial Times, saying, “Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” adding: “It would also mean we had to be [on Kharg] for a while.”
Neoconservatives have been pushing hard for such an invasion, with Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) recently saying, “We did Iwo Jima, we can do this,” in reference to the World War II battle for the Japanese island of the same name, which saw over 25,000 American casualties.
Bannon argues it should not be left to Americans to handle the task, telling his audience, “I want Arabs, I want the UAE, MBZ [Prince Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, President of the United Arab Emirates], who’s the best they’ve got over there… He’s got a real army; it’s not huge, but they actually know how to fight… Kharg Island, there’s your objective, go.”
BANNON: Netanyahu’s kid down in Miami, turf him out tomorrow! Where’s DHS when you need them? Get him back there! Put a uniform on him; let’s have him in the first wave! pic.twitter.com/qmyeH393hx
“And throw in a couple of Qatar princes, throw the Saudi princes in there, too. Get ’em out of London, get ’em out of the casinos and whore houses in London, and get ’em back to the Gulf,” Bannon continued, adding: “[Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu’s kid down in Miami, turf him out tomorrow. Where’s DHS? Throw him out, get him back there, put a uniform on him. Let’s have him in the first wave.”
Israel is currently reported to be lobbying against a ceasefire in the Iran war, arguing it needs “several more weeks” to achieve “full strategic victory,” which now includes seizing southern Lebanon.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. planes have been banned from using Spanish airspace in connection with the war in Iran.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Spanish Defense Minister Margarita Robles and the United States military.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on Monday in Spain.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Neither the bases are authorized, nor, of course, is the use of Spanish airspace authorized for any actions related to the war in Iran.” – Margarita Robles
🎯IMPACT: The decision underscores Spain’s opposition to the war and limits U.S. military options in the region.
IN FULL
Spain’s Defense Minister has announced that the country will no longer allow U.S. military planes to traverse its airspace to conduct operations against the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Spanish Socialist Party government made the announcement on Monday and stressed that the country has made its opposition to U.S.-Israeli military actions against Iran clear from the beginning.
“Neither the bases are authorized, nor, of course, is the use of Spanish airspace authorized for any actions related to the war in Iran,” Defense Minister Margarita Robles stated, adding, “This was made perfectly clear to the American military and forces from the very beginning.” She reiterated that Spain views the war in Iran as “profoundly illegal and profoundly unjust.”
The decision follows an earlier move to deny the United States the use of jointly operated military bases in the country for activities tied to the conflict. Notably, the denial of airspace and base access could create a minor complication for U.S. military logistics in moving additional resources, munitions, and equipment to the Middle East. However, other European nations have opened their airspace, allowing some flexibility.
The National Pulse reported at the beginning of March that, anticipating the lack of cooperation from Spain‘s socialist government, the U.S. military moved at least 15 aircraft from the Rota and Morón air bases in southern Spain. According to tracking data, at least seven aircraft were redeployed to Ramstein Air Base in Germany.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Most Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees affected by the Senate Democrats’ shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) received at least two paychecks covering back pay for the two prior pay periods on Monday.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: TSA employees, DHS, Senate Democrats, and President Donald J. Trump.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The paychecks were issued on Monday, March 30, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “American travelers are paying the price for Democrats’ partisan games. The president worked with his legal team and the Office of Management and Budget to find a solution to take care of the emergency we were seeing in air travel across the country, and because of the president, TSA agents are being paid.” — White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt
🎯IMPACT: Last week, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order directing the Secretary of Homeland Security, along with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to utilize funds with a “reasonable logical nexus” to TSA operations to pay the over 60,000 TSA employees, including approximately 50,000 transportation security officers.
IN FULL
Most Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees affected by the Senate Democrats’ shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) received at least two paychecks covering back pay for the two prior pay periods on Monday. The National Pulse reported last week that President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order directing the Secretary of Homeland Security, along with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to utilize funds with a “reasonable logical nexus” to TSA operations to pay the over 60,000 TSA employees, including approximately 50,000 transportation security officers.
As of Monday, DHS says almost all TSA employees should have received payments, but noted that some checks may be delayed. “A small population might see a slight delay due to a variety of reasons, including financial institution processing times or issues with their direct deposit,” DHS Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis stated, adding, “We are working aggressively with USDA’s National Finance Center to complete processing for the half paycheck they are owed from pay period 3 as soon as possible.”
Speaking at Monday’s press briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt emphasized that the air travel crisis is a direct result of congressional Democrats’ intransigence on funding DHS. “American travelers are paying the price for Democrats’ partisan games. The president worked with his legal team and the Office of Management and Budget to find a solution to take care of the emergency we were seeing in air travel across the country, and because of the president, TSA agents are being paid,” Leavitt said.
Still, a number of House and Senate Democrats contend that President Trump‘s order to pay TSA agents violates federal law and infringes on Congress’s constitutional power over appropriations. Nearly 500 transportation security officers have resigned since the shutdown began, and many more have reported sick at unprecedented rates. This situation has led to excessive security wait times at airports, some reaching over many hours, causing chaos for travelers and increasing the risk of security issues amid the ongoing Iran war.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Labor proposed a regulation to expand retirement investment options for Americans, with the inclusion of alternative assets in 401(k) plans.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Department of Labor, Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The new rule was announced on Monday, March 30, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Americans’ ability to participate more fully in innovation and economic growth through well-diversified long-term investments is a vitally important priority for effective retirement planning.” – SEC Chairman Paul Atkins
🎯IMPACT: The new rule broadens access to alternative retirement investments for over 90 million Americans and could potentially increase 40(k) returns by roughly 50 basis points annually.
IN FULL
The Trump administration unveiled a new federal rule aimed at increasing retirement investment options for more than 90 million Americans, including opening 401(k) plans to investments in private equity, real estate, digital assets, and private credit. Under the new regulatory guidance issued on Monday by the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), the average American saving for retirement is expected to see better returns, improved diversification, and access to private-market opportunities typically restricted to wealthy investors.
Notably, the new guidance for 401(k) plan managers outlines steps for considering alternative assets and establishing safe harbors for plan fiduciaries when selecting investment alternatives. The proposal is a result of President Donald J. Trump’s August 7, 2025, Executive Order democratizing access to alternative assets for 401(k) investors.
“This proposed rule will show how plans can consider products that better reflect the investment landscape as it exists today. This greater diversity will drive innovation and result in a major win for American workers, retirees, and their families,” said Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer. Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hailed the regulatory change, emphasizing “the proposed rule is an initial step in implementing the President’s Executive Order in a safe and smart manner, broadening access to additional retirement plan options for millions of Americans while being mindful of the importance of protecting retirement assets.”
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins, addressing the rule change, stated, “Americans’ ability to participate more fully in innovation and economic growth through well-diversified long-term investments is a vitally important priority for effective retirement planning.”
The Department of Labor emphasized that the lack of regulatory clarity has long made managers of defined contribution plans wary of alternative investments, even though such investments are technically legal. “In 2022, the Biden Administration further stifled these investments through a rescinded compliance release that warned fiduciaries about including cryptocurrency options in 401(k) plans,” the agency stated. Importantly, some projections suggest the new rule could potentially increase 401(k) returns by roughly 50 basis points annually.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. has issued an advisory for all American citizens to leave Iraq due to escalating threats and attacks by Iran and allied militias, especially on universities with perceived ties to the American government.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and American citizens in Iraq.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The advisory was issued on Sunday, with threats targeting Baghdad, Sulaymaniyah, Dohuk, and other locations in Iraq.
💬KEY QUOTE: “From now on, all universities of the occupier regime and American universities in the West Asia region will be legitimate targets for us.” – Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
🎯IMPACT: U.S. citizens in Iraq face significant risks, including potential kidnappings, missile attacks, and targeted strikes on American-linked institutions.
IN FULL
The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad has warned American citizens to leave Iraq immediately due to escalating threats from the Islamic Republic of Iran and militias aligned with the Islamist regime. The advisory highlighted potential attacks on American-linked universities and other institutions in Baghdad, Sulaymaniyah, and Dohuk, as well as civilian sites around the Middle Eastern country.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has declared U.S.-linked universities in the region to be “legitimate targets.” On Sunday, a statement from the IRGC was published in Iraqi media informing “the unwise rulers of the White House” that “from now on, all universities of the occupier [Israeli] regime and American universities in the West Asia region will be legitimate targets for us.” Notably, the IRGC statement advised individuals near these universities to maintain a distance of at least half-a-mile, citing recent strikes on Iranian universities as justification for their threats.
The IRGC statement also claimed that Iran and its affiliated militias have conducted widespread attacks in Iraq, targeting airports, government institutions, energyinfrastructure, and hotels frequented by foreigners. Meanwhile, the U.S. government has warned that these groups may also attempt kidnappings of American citizens.
Likewise, the U.S. State Department continues to reiterate its Level 4 “Do Not Travel” warning for Iraq, urging Americans to leave immediately. Overland routes into Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey remain the primary options for departure, though each route has its own restrictions and potential delays. Jordan currently offers the most accessible exit, with commercial flights operating from Amman.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed avoided commenting on the assassination of Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, citing concerns about upsetting constituents in Dearborn, according to leaked audio.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Abdul El-Sayed, his campaign team, and the late Iranian Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: March 1, during a private campaign strategy call, following Khamenei’s death on February 28.
💬KEY QUOTE: “There are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad today. So, like, I just don’t want to comment on Khamenei at all.” – Abdul El-Sayed
🎯IMPACT: Dearborn, Michigan, home to the largest Muslim population per capita in the U.S., has become a focal point in El-Sayed’s campaign. The city, which recently became the nation’s first Arab-majority city, has a history of political divisions over Middle Eastern conflicts.
IN FULL
Michigan U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed (D) stated during a private campaign call on March 1 that he would avoid publicly commenting on the death of Iran’s now-former Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei. According to audio obtained by the Washington Free Beacon, El-Sayed expressed concern about upsetting constituents in Dearborn, saying, “There are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad today. So, like, I just don’t want to comment on Khamenei at all.”
Khamenei was killed in a joint U.S.-Israeli airstrike just days earlier, on February 28. El-Sayed said he would pivot to criticism of former President Donald J. Trump if pressed by reporters, stating, “I’m just gonna go straight to pedophilia, frankly.” He also proposed attacking Israel and pro-Israel lobbying groups like AIPAC during the call.
Dearborn, Michigan, home to the largest Muslim population per capita in the U.S., has become a focal point in El-Sayed’s campaign. The city, which recently became the nation’s first Arab-majority city, has a history of political divisions over Middle Eastern conflicts. Just hours after the deadly October 7, 2023, terror attacks against Israel by Hamas, Dearborn’s Democrat Muslim mayor, Abdullah Hammoud, defended the Islamist violence as an “inevitable” consequence of Israeli “occupation”. Subsequently, former President Joe Biden appointed Hammoud to the State Department’s Assembly of Local Leaders program.
Dearborn featured in the 2017 book No Go Zones: How Sharia Law Is Coming to a Neighborhood Near You by Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, as an example of an emerging, European-style Islamic enclave in the U.S. In recent years, police in Dearborn have been issued optional Arabic patches, and Mayor Hammoud warned a Christian resident he was “not welcome” in the city when he expressed opposition to street signs honoring an Arab publisher accused of supporting terror, indicating that the process of Islamization is accelerating.
Notably, El-Sayed’s remarks on Khamenei have drawn criticism from his own advisers, who expressed discomfort with his messaging on Israel. In the leaked call, El-Sayed defended his position, stating, “I got to take the whole shot, which means that I’m going to say, ‘Look, you’ve got AIPAC-backed congresspeople who now don’t want to empower Congress to step up and enforce its own prerogative.'” He also suggested that left-wing influencers like Jennifer Welch might “bait” him into discussing his views on Israel in future interviews.
On the campaign trail, El-Sayed has frequently criticized U.S. foreign policy and military actions in the Middle East. He has also made controversial statements in the past, including claiming that the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the U.S. war on terror were derived from the same “tribalistic grievance,” and refusing to stand for the national anthem as a college athlete.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.