Wednesday, September 23, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

John Thune is The New Senate Leader — Here Are His Biggest Corporate Donors.

Senator John Thune (R-SD) will be the new Senate Majority Leader after winning a closely contested election that was forced to a second ballot. A political moderate and protégé of the former Republican Leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Thune was widely considered the favorite to win—despite an insurgent campaign by Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL).

Despite McConnell’s tutelage, the South Dakota Senator is not seen as nearly as effective a floor leader or as ruthless a political operator. Thune’s more reserved personality could present opportunities for President-elect Donald J. Trump‘s allies in the Senate to advance his America First agenda—especially by leveraging what the new Majority Leader cares about most: his donors.

Among Thune’s top donors are interests representing the finance, insurance, and real estate industries. The South Dakota Republican also draws contributions from Big Tech and the energy sector. One of Thune’s most consistent and largest corporate donors is New York Life Insurance. Since 2016, the insurance company has donated over $150,000—between individual and PAC contributions—directly to Thune’s campaign committee. Prudential Financial and Guardian Life Insurance are also major donors to Thune, though their total contributions are far lower than those from New York Life Insurance.

In addition to the insurance industry, Thune is backed by several technology and communications titans, including Google, Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, and the Sinclair Broadcast Group. However, by and large, the new Senate Majority Leader’s largest corporate donor is NextEra Energy. Since 2016, the company has donated nearly $300,000 to Thune’s campaign committee.

Other major Thune donors include the Blackstone Group, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, CGCN Group, Norfolk Southern, Arizona Tile, Capital Group Companies, Sanford Health, and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Image by Gage Skidmore.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin Cracks Down on Chinese Birth Tourism as Xi Visits.

The State Department is targeting individuals and networks facilitating commercial birth tourism.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a new visa restriction policy targeting networks and individuals engaged in commercial birth tourism. The policy, implemented under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, aims to prevent exploitation of U.S. immigration rules for foreign-born children to obtain citizenship.
📺 DETAIL: Birth tourism involves foreign nationals traveling to the U.S. primarily to give birth, so their children automatically obtain American citizenship. The Trump administration attempted to restrict this “birthright citizenship” to fewer foreign nationals, but the Supreme Court ruled the restrictions unconstitutional. new policy targets those who facilitate this practice, including birth-tourism businesses, visa fixers, and certain medical providers. This builds on previous measures, such as the 2020 State Department guidance allowing consular officers to deny visas for suspected birth tourism purposes.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “American citizenship is not for sale,” Rubio stated, denouncing birth tourism networks “coaching foreigners to defraud the U.S. visa system, arranging travel and housing, and even forging documents.”
🎯 IMPACT: The policy underscores the broader effort by the U.S. government to tighten immigration enforcement and address loopholes exploited by foreign nationals. While the announcement does not single out any specific nationality, it coincides with ongoing U.S.-China friction, with birth tourism by wealthy Chinese nationals having been a recurring issue.
📺 FLASHBACK: In January 2020, the State Department introduced guidance allowing officers to deny B visas if they believed the applicant’s primary purpose was birth tourism. This new policy builds on that foundation by targeting facilitators and organizations involved in the practice.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The State Department is targeting individuals and networks facilitating commercial birth tourism.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin Reportedly Considering Diesel Export Ban, After Energy Sec Warned It Would Make Things Worse.

The Trump administration is reportedly weighing a 90-day ban on diesel exports, a move that has sparked internal debate and warnings of potential negative consequences for fuel prices.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to implement a 90-day ban on diesel exports in response to record-high diesel prices, which have surged by 76 percent over the past year, according to AAA. This is despite Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s recent warning that such bans are counterproductive.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The blunt tool ​of banning diesel exports definitely doesn’t work… If you can’t ⁠export the diesel that comes out of our refineries, you run out of places to store it, and you have to reduce U.S. refining, which would ​put upward pressure on gasoline prices and jet fuel prices.” – Energy Secretary Chris Wright
🎯 IMPACT: Critics, including members of the administration and the oil industry, warn that the ban could lead to reduced refining capacity, potentially increasing gasoline and jet fuel prices in the long term, despite any short-term relief it might bring to diesel costs.
📺 DETAIL: The legal process for the ban is still under discussion. This would mark the first restriction on U.S. energy exports since a decades-old ban on oil exports was lifted in 2015. Significantly, the lifting of the ban resulted in fuel prices falling rather than rising, as it increased global supply and cut costs across the wider international market.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump administration is reportedly weighing a 90-day ban on diesel exports, a move that has sparked internal debate and warnings of potential negative consequences for fuel prices.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

RNC Sues State Election Officials for Withholding Voter Rolls.

The Republican National Committee has filed a lawsuit against New Jersey election officials, demanding transparency after discovering noncitizens on the voter rolls.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Republican National Committee (RNC) and New Jersey GOP leaders filed a lawsuit against state election officials and five counties, alleging they failed to release federally mandated voter roll maintenance records. The lawsuit follows the discovery of noncitizens on the state’s voter rolls and aims to compel transparency.
📺 DETAIL: The RNC alleges that New Jersey election officials and county authorities in Bergen, Hudson, Middlesex, Somerset, and Union counties have withheld key records required by federal law. This follows revelations of over 6,600 noncitizens being registered to vote, some of whom had participated in past elections. The RNC has previously sued the state over similar issues, with this lawsuit serving as part of a broader campaign to ensure election integrity nationwide.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The RNC exposed noncitizens on New Jersey’s voter rolls. Now, election officials are hiding the records that would tell voters how it happened. The RNC won’t stand for it.” – RNC Chairman Joe Gruters
💬 SECONDARY QUOTE: “New Jerseyans deserve complete transparency following Gov. Sherrill’s admission that over 6,600 noncitizens were added to our voter rolls… Election officials must immediately release these records, so voters get the complete truth.” ” – Rep. Tom Kean Jr. (R-NJ)
🎯 IMPACT: The lawsuit seeks to uncover how noncitizens were added to voter rolls and whether they were removed following discovery. Congressional investigators are also probing these issues, raising broader concerns about election integrity and transparency ahead of the 2026 midterms.
📺 FLASHBACK: In June, reports revealed that some noncitizens self-attested their status while seeking naturalization, yet were found to have voted in prior elections. Academic research shows that, despite it being illegal for noncitizens to vote, they do so in sufficient numbers to alter election outcomes, and tend to favor the Democrats.

Image by Famartin.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Republican National Committee has filed a lawsuit against New Jersey election officials, demanding transparency after discovering noncitizens on the voter rolls.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Harvey Weinstein Receives 15-Year Sentence for Assaulting Production Assistant.

Disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein received a 15-year sentence for sexually assaulting a production assistant in 2006.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Harvey Weinstein was sentenced to 15 years in prison on Wednesday for sexually assaulting television production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006. This marks the second sentencing in the case, following the overturning of a prior conviction and a new jury’s finding him guilty in June 2025.
📺 DETAIL: Miriam Haley described the lasting trauma Weinstein caused in a victim impact statement, calling it a “life sentence” for her. Weinstein, who has denied all allegations of rape and sexual assault from multiple women, expressed remorse for Haley’s pain but maintained his innocence. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg commended Haley and other survivors for their courage throughout the legal process, saying, “I’m moved, as we should all be moved, by their courage and their steadfastness through what has obviously been a challenging process.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Having been sexually assaulted by Harvey Weinstein has had a devastating effect on my life and sense of security that may never go away,” said Miriam Haley during her statement to the court. “It’s a life sentence for me.”
🎯 IMPACT: Weinstein has already served over six years in prison as his case moved through the legal system, and he is expected to appeal this latest sentence. The accusations against Weinstein became a catalyst for and a focal point in the #MeToo movement, particularly when it was more focused on abuses of power in Hollywood rather than the actions of men generally.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein received a 15-year sentence for sexually assaulting a production assistant in 2006.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Mexican Illegal Deported After Publicly Complaining About Son’s Arrest for Obstructing ICE.

A Mexican illegal alien was deported after complaining about her U.S. citizen son being detained for obstructing an ICE operation.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Teresa De Jesus Ochoa Briseno, a Mexican illegal alien living in Texas, was deported to her home country on September 21 after her son, a U.S. citizen, was detained during a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation. Her son, 17-year-old Luis Ochoa, was arrested in Alamo, Texas, after reportedly attempting to obstruct an ICE operation and resisting officers.
📺 DETAIL: Ochoa and a friend allegedly stopped to record an ICE raid and were accused of interfering with the operation. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stated that Ochoa became “verbally and physically combative” during his arrest. “Officers relied on their training to control the situation, and the agitators were placed under arrest. Deportation officers sustained minor injuries and were treated at a local clinic,” the department explained. Briseno complained in the media about her son’s detention, despite having a final deportation order pending, and was detained shortly afterward.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “He’s a minor. It’s traumatic enough for an adult, for something like this to happen to him is really tough. It was eight hours without hearing from him. They wouldn’t give me any information; they behaved very badly,” Briseno said of her son’s arrest in comments to local media.
🎯 IMPACT: Briseno’s deportation underlines the Trump administration’s determination not to allow illegal immigrants to live in the open, flouting deportation orders without consequences. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A Mexican illegal alien was deported after complaining about her U.S. citizen son being detained for obstructing an ICE operation.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump DOJ Forces Six Major Hospitals to Stop Child Sex-Change Procedures.

The Trump administration has brokered agreements with six major hospital systems to end childhood gender transition procedures.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration, through the Department of Justice (DOJ), has forced six major hospital systems, including New York University (NYU) Langone Hospitals and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, to agree to cease providing puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries to minors. These agreements also include financial settlements, such as NYU paying $8.5 million and UPMC $950,000, to resolve investigations into their potential violations of federal laws.
📺 DETAIL: The DOJ’s investigation, launched on President Donald J. Trump’s orders in 2025, examines potential violations of federal health laws, including the False Claims Act and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Allegations include misuse of diagnosis codes to obtain payments for gender transition procedures. While some hospitals had already ceased such treatments due to state laws or prior pressure, the DOJ agreements formalize these commitments and include provisions for restorative care for people harmed by prior treatments.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Hospitals that target children in these practices and then fraudulently obtain payment for the procedures will be held to account.” – Attorney General Todd Blanche
🎯 IMPACT: These agreements mark a significant step in the Trump administration’s effort to curtail childhood gender transitions nationwide, with ongoing investigations signaling further actions against other providers.
📺 FLASHBACK: Since May, similar agreements have been reached with Mount Sinai Health System, Texas Children’s Hospital, Cleveland Clinic, and Connecticut Children’s Hospital. Notably, Texas Children’s Hospital had already ceased such treatments prior to its settlement, which also included a $10 million payment and the establishment of a restorative care clinic.
🎯 CAVEAT: The hospitals involved generally deny wrongdoing, with the settlements resolving allegations rather than proven liabilities.

Image by Silar.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump administration has brokered agreements with six major hospital systems to end childhood gender transition procedures.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Manchester United Muslim Group Founder Attacking Club Chairman is NHS Policymaker With Anti-British Social Media History.

Ghulam Haydar, co-founder of the Manchester United Muslim Supporters Club which has been attacking club chairman Sir Jim Ratcliffe, is a National Health Service policymaker with a history of anti-British and anti-white social media posts.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Ghulam Haydar, co-founder of the Manchester United Muslim Supporters Club (MUMSC), which has been attacking Manchester United Chairman Sir Jim Ratcliffe, is a National Senior Policy Lead at National Health Service (NHS) England and has a history of social media posts expressing anti-British and anti-white sentiments, The National Pulse can reveal.
📰 DETAIL: MUMSC, which is recognized by Manchester United and has collaborated with it on building prayer facilities and organizing Islamic iftar events, has called for Ratcliffe to step down, citing his remarks that Britain has been “colonised” by immigrants and is “on the slide.” Speaking for MUMSC, Haydar told local media Ratcliffe’s remarks were “inflammatory” and “divisive.” However, Haydar himself has a history of running down Britain and describing the British people as “colonisers” even in their own home islands. Posting on X (formerly Twitter) in 2023, he said, “Britain… ransacked, pillaged & destroyed India who had the world’s biggest GDP! They shouldn’t have begged the Indians to come to the UK to rebuild it after the world wars. We’re not going anywhere.” In 2019, he wrote: “I’m astonished at how heritage Muslims have internalised these issues & can not (or will not) understand matters of race. Your experience although subjective are widespread. To deny it isn’t as a result of internalised love for white / superior is ludicrous.” In 2018, he criticized British counter-terrorism police for posting an Eid greeting that also asked people to report suspicious activity, arguing it linked Muslims and Islam to terrorism “when no such stats linking the 2 exists” and suggesting they should be concerned with England supporters beating their wives and girlfriends after football matches. In a 2017 post on Facebook, he bizarrely denigrated British people living in Britain as “colonisers,” telling fellow Muslims: “In years to come, future generations of Muslims living in Britain will look through the annals of history and examine previous generations… Be the resilient decolonised change maker. Do not internalise and perpetuate the narrative of the coloniser.” He also objected to British drone strikes targeting Islamic State fighters in 2015, complaining, “Rule of law? Due process? Extrajudicial killings? British Values?” One of the jihadists targeted was Cardiff-born Reyaad Khan, who had been directing terror plots against Britain.
🎯 IMPACT: Haydar’s past comments and his current role in the NHS, Britain’s government-run socialized health service, raise questions about the compatibility of his views with his professional responsibilities and MUSC’s official partnership with Manchester United.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Ghulam Haydar, co-founder of the Manchester United Muslim Supporters Club which has been attacking club chairman Sir Jim Ratcliffe, is a National Health Service policymaker with a history of anti-British and anti-white social media posts.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

USPS Worker Indicted for Discarding Over 300 Mail-In Ballots.

A former USPS worker faces federal charges for allegedly discarding over 300 mail-in ballots, raising concerns about election integrity.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A former U.S. Postal Service (USPS) worker in Utah has been indicted for allegedly setting aside more than 300 mail-in ballots and discarding them rather than delivering them to voters, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ). Damon Matai Seei, 34, of Payson, Utah, was indicted by a federal grand jury on September 16 on a charge involving the unlawful secretion, destruction, and delay of mail and was arrested Tuesday before making his initial appearance in federal court in Salt Lake City.
📺 DETAIL: Prosecutors allege Seei was working as a letter carrier on June 3 when he was entrusted with delivering mail to more than 300 residents in Eagle Mountain ahead of Utah’s June 23 primary election. The case came to light after complaints prompted the county clerk to review voter participation data and identify unusually low turnout in the area where the complaints originated. It is unclear whether the affected voters received replacement ballots or were otherwise able to cast their votes, with federal investigators expected to contact them as the investigation continues. Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter said the alleged disposal of hundreds of ballots was a serious federal crime, adding that election integrity is not a partisan issue. The investigation was conducted jointly by the USPS Office of Inspector General and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and Seei is scheduled to appear in court again on November 30.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “When American voters lawfully cast their vote, they should feel confident that it is counted.” – Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter
🎯 IMPACT: The case underlines concerns about the handling and security of mail-in ballots, particularly when large numbers of ballots are entrusted to individual postal workers. With investigators still determining whether affected voters were able to cast replacement ballots, the incident could fuel broader scrutiny of election-related mail procedures and ballot safeguards ahead of future elections.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A former USPS worker faces federal charges for allegedly discarding over 300 mail-in ballots, raising concerns about election integrity.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump DOJ Hits Back at Corporate Media Lawsuit Against White House Bans: ‘Access is a Privilege, Not a Right.’

The Trump administration has stated that access to the White House is a privilege, not a right, in response to corporate media outlets suing the administration over their loss of White House access.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has defended the administration’s decision to bar CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), and POLITICO from the White House, calling corporate media access to the complex a privilege rather than a constitutional right. In a late-night filing Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., four DOJ attorneys, including Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate, argued that Trump acted after determining the outlets had failed to meet expected standards of professionalism and decorum.
📺 DETAIL: The filing accuses the three news organizations of publishing verifiably false claims about national security and other matters, as well as sensitive or classified information. The DOJ argues that Trump has therefore preliminarily revoked their access in response to these issues, while emphasizing that their right to report on the administration generally remains unaffected. The filing also cited Trump’s heated exchange with CNN correspondent Kaitlan Collins at the United Nations on Tuesday as evidence that the President remains willing to interact with the three outlets outside the White House. CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO have sued over the restrictions, claiming that the ban violates the First Amendment. Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly is scheduled to hear arguments Wednesday afternoon.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The President concluded that [the banned outlets] have failed to maintain basic minimum ‘standards of professionalism and decorum expected of those given access to the White House Complex, including’ by ‘publishing sensitive or classified information… In response, the President has preliminarily revoked their continued access to White House grounds… After all, access to the White House is a privilege—not a right.” – DOJ filing
🎯 IMPACT: The dispute could have broader implications for the relationship between the Trump administration and corporate media organizations, with Fox News joining liberal networks in a television pool boycott in support of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO. The administration has launched “Trump TV” in response, providing Americans with direct coverage of the presidency.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump administration has stated that access to the White House is a privilege, not a right, in response to corporate media outlets suing the administration over their loss of White House access.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK PM Burnham Refuses to Meet Mother of Woman Murdered by Migrant.

The mother of a woman murdered by a boat migrant has condemned Prime Minister Andy Burnham after he refused to meet with her.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The mother of a 27-year-old British woman murdered by a Sudanese asylum seeker has criticized British Prime Minister Andy Burnham for refusing to meet with her family nearly two years after her daughter’s killing. Siobhan Whyte’s daughter, Rhiannon Whyte, was killed at a railway station in Walsall, England, in October 2024 after leaving work at a nearby hotel where her attacker, Deng Chol Majek, had been staying at the taxpayers’ expense.
📺 DETAIL: Majek was convicted of murder and possessing a screwdriver as an offensive weapon after prosecutors presented CCTV footage showing him attacking Rhiannon on a railway platform. The court heard that Rhiannon suffered 19 wounds to her head, including a fatal brain stem injury, and died in a hospital three days later after being found by a train driver and guard. In a letter sent via Labour Party lawmaker Matt Western, Burnham described the killing as “an awful tragedy” and claimed he shared Siobhan’s anger over the killer’s lack of remorse, but essentially dismissed her by noting a previous meeting with a junior Home Office minister. Siobhan accused the Prime Minister of sending “half arsed condolences” on Wednesday, saying she would never stop seeking answers for her daughter. The case raises questions about Britain’s asylum system, with the court hearing that Majek had told British authorities he was a teenager, despite German authorities recording him as 27 during a failed asylum claim.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Where were Rhiannon’s human rights that she wasn’t able to come home that night?” – Siobhan Whyte
🎯 IMPACT: The case is likely to intensify debate in Britain over the vetting, monitoring, and detention of illegal immigrants, as Rhiannon Whyte’s family continues to press the government for answers. Siobhan Whyte’s campaign for “Rhiannon’s Law,” which calls for asylum seekers to be detained instead of being left at large among the public while their claims are processed, could add pressure on officials to consider tighter safeguards.
📺 FLASHBACK: Majek had been flagged for concerning behavior at the hotel where he lived, including staring at female staff. Despite these warnings, no preventive action was taken before the attack on Rhiannon.

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The mother of a woman murdered by a boat migrant has condemned Prime Minister Andy Burnham after he refused to meet with her.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.