GET THE APP
Tuesday, June 30, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

December 23, 2023
William Upton
Immigration

Matt Gaetz Blasts Airlines for Mass Transport of Illegals, Demands Details as Migrants Flood U.S. Airports.

Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-FL) is calling on Ed Bastion, CEO of Delta Air Lines, to appear before Congress in order to answer questions regarding his company’s involvement with the transportation of illegal immigrants from the U.S. border into the interior of the country.

“The United States Congress has an interest in understanding pursuant to which arrangements with federal agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) non-resident aliens are able to book and travel on Delta Air Lines flights,” Gaetz wrote.

The Florida lawmaker expressed concerns over to what degree the illegal immigrants had been vetted and screened on both national security and public health grounds. Specifically, Gaetz is asking Bastion to provide to Congress the number of illegal immigrants the airline has “transported on behalf of the government or non-governmental organizations since January 20, 2021” as well as if Delta has received any benefits, funding, or credit from the federal government in exchange for providing transport for illegal immigrants.

Additionally, he pressed Bastion as to details regarding the process for which NGOs purchase transportation for illegal immigrants using Delta flights and if the TSA has dictated to the company what sorts of identification are necessary for illegal immigrants to clear airport security.

“I’m concerned the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) may be allowing non-resident aliens to board flights, including those operated by Delta Air Lines, with an alternative form of identification that meets a weaker standard than that used to verify the identities of American citizens when they fly,” Gaetz wrote.

U.S. airline passengers have reported seeing lines illegal immigrants at airports in the Southwestern United States, many of whom appear to be boarding flights – ostensibly paid for by the Biden regime – to other U.S. cities despite lacking identification documents.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

20 minutes ago
News
SCOTUS

Thomas Warns Supreme Court’s Birthright Ruling ‘Devalues’ American Citizenship in 91-Page Dissent.

Justice Clarence Thomas dissented strongly against the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to uphold birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants, arguing it misinterprets the 14th Amendment.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants in a 6-3 ruling on Tuesday, with Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberal justices being joined by Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh, despite the latter offering a partial dissent. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas dissented, with Justice Thomas criticizing the majority for misinterpreting the 14th Amendment in a 91-page dissent.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The Court says that the Citizenship Clause incorporated the English feudal principle that subjects owed lifetime servitude to the King who owned the soil on which they were born, but Americans—unsurprisingly—rejected this feudal principle.” – Justice Thomas
📰 DETAIL: Justice Thomas argued that the Citizenship Clause was intended to grant citizenship to those not subject to foreign powers, such as black Americans post-Civil War, and not to children of foreign visitors. “Blacks were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans. They had no other homeland, owed no allegiance to any foreign power, and were subject to no other authority. They ‘fought and bled in the same battles,’ ‘gained and gloried in the same victories,’ and were ‘liable to be called upon to defend [America] in time of war’ alongside every other citizen… The Citizenship Clause thus guaranteed them the ‘dignity and glory of American citizenship,’ so as to ensure that they would never be treated as second class under the law,” he wrote, adding: “The same could not be said for the children of foreign temporary visitors. Foreign temporary visitors were attached to their home country, lacked similar bonds to this country, and would not be called upon in time of war.”
🎯 IMPACT: Thomas wrote that he was not sure that the Court’s decision on Tuesday would “stand the test of time,” explaining, “The Citizenship Clause ‘added greatly to the dignity and glory of American citizenship.’ Today’s opinion devalues that citizenship.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Justice Clarence Thomas dissented strongly against the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision to uphold birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants, arguing it misinterprets the 14th Amendment.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

1 hour ago
News
SCOTUS

Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Limits on Campaign Spending.

The Supreme Court has ruled that federal limits on coordinated campaign spending by political parties violate the First Amendment.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) limits on coordinated expenditures by political parties violate the First Amendment. This decision overturns a 2001 precedent set by FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee, a.k.a. Colorado II, which upheld these limits.
📰 DETAIL: The case was brought by a group of candidates and political party committees challenging the constitutionality of FECA’s restrictions. The Court’s decision aligns with the argument that these limits infringe on free speech rights as protected by the First Amendment. The ruling emphasizes that political parties, like individuals and outside groups, can make unlimited independent expenditures.
🎯 IMPACT: This decision could significantly alter the landscape of campaign financing, allowing political parties greater freedom to coordinate spending with their candidates. It may lead to increased influence of party committees in elections, potentially reshaping campaign strategies and funding dynamics.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Held: FECA’s political-party coordinated-expenditure limits violate the First Amendment.” – Supreme Court Syllabus

This story is developing…

Image by Mathieu Landretti.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Supreme Court has ruled that federal limits on coordinated campaign spending by political parties violate the First Amendment.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
News
SCOTUS

BREAKING: Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship for Children of Illegal Aliens.

The Supreme Court’s decision on birthright citizenship overturns an executive order stating that the children of illegal immigrants born on U.S. soil should not receive U.S. citizenship automatically.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Supreme Court overturned an executive order rescinding birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants on Tuesday. The policy is rooted in the 14th Amendment, which grants U.S. citizenship to almost anyone born in the U.S. The ruling was 6-3, with Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Elena Kagan, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in the majority, plus Justice Brett Kavanaugh largely concurring but dissenting in part. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented.
📺 DETAIL: Birthright citizenship is based on the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, which affirms that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen, provided they are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the country. President Donald J. Trump has strongly criticized the policy, arguing that the amendment was intended to safeguard the rights of the children of freed slaves, not to grant citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, including the children of illegal aliens. Birthright citizenship is rare beyond the Americas, with China and much of Europe basing citizenship for children born on their territory on the parents’ nationality.
🎯 IMPACT: By ruling that anyone born on U.S. soil, short of a handful of narrow exceptions such as the children of diplomats, must be granted U.S. citizenship, the Supreme Court has incentivized illegal immigrants to have so-called “anchor babies” in order to hinder their removal. The Trump administration now has few avenues to alter the status quo beyond pushing for a constitutional amendment, which would be very difficult to pass, given strong Democrat resistance to denying the children of illegal aliens citizenship. Some legislative efforts are underway to pass bills reinterpreting the 14th Amendment as not applying to the children of illegal immigrants, but even if these were to pass both congressional chambers, they would likely end up back before the Supreme Court.
📺 FLASHBACK: The Supreme Court first affirmed birthright citizenship in the Wong Kim Ark case in 1898, concerning a child born in the U.S. to Chinese parents. The justices decided that, because they were “subjects of the Emperor of China” but “not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China,” the child should be deemed a U.S. citizen by right of his birth on U.S. soil. The executive order the justices ruled on today sought to remove that right from the children of foreign nationals not lawfully present in the U.S. Birthright citizenship is not typical globally, with most jurisdictions requiring that parents must be citizens of a country to pass citizenship to their children.

This story is developing…

Image by Joe Ravi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Supreme Court's decision on birthright citizenship overturns an executive order stating that the children of illegal immigrants born on U.S. soil should not receive U.S. citizenship automatically.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
News
SCOTUS

BREAKING: Supreme Court Backs States Protecting Women’s Sports From Male Competitors.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that states can legally restrict women’s sports to biological females, affirming the legality of laws in West Virginia and Idaho.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that Title IX permits states to maintain separate sports teams for women and girls based on biological sex, supporting laws in West Virginia and Idaho that bar biological males claiming to be transgender from female sports categories.
📰 DETAIL: The decision consolidates West Virginia et al. v. B. P. J. and Little v. Hecox, affirming that these state laws do not violate Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause. The Court emphasized that Title IX’s reference to “sex” pertains to biological sex, not gender identity, allowing for separate athletic opportunities based on biological differences.
🎯 IMPACT: This ruling is a significant victory for female athletes and advocates of women’s sports, reinforcing the ability of states to enact laws that ensure fair competition by restricting female sports categories to biological females. It also provides a legal precedent for the 27 states with similar laws.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex, and West Virginia has permissibly maintained female sports for biological females consistent with Title IX.” – Supreme Court ruling

This story is developing…

Image by Billy Wilson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that states can legally restrict women's sports to biological females, affirming the legality of laws in West Virginia and Idaho.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
Health
News

Silver Spring Company Unleashes 600,000 Infected Mosquitoes in DC.

A Silver Spring-based company is releasing diseased mosquitoes in the Washington, D.C. area, in hopes they will infect Asian Tiger Mosquitoes and reduce their numbers.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Bee Safe Mosquito Control, a Maryland-based company, has begun releasing male mosquitoes infected with the Wolbachia bacteria in the D.C. area, hoping they will spread the disease to aggressive Asian Tiger Mosquitoes and reduce their populations. These “ZAP males” make female mosquitoes infertile after mating, preventing them from producing offspring. Skeptics of insect programs warn that the potential risks to human health and to species that feed on mosquitoes are unclear.
📺 DETAIL: The Asian Tiger Mosquito is a common pest in the region and is capable of transmitting diseases such as Dengue Fever, Zika, and Yellow Fever. The ZAP males are sourced from MosquitoMate, a Kentucky-based company with EPA approval for this biopesticide technology, which has already shown success internationally, reducing Dengue cases by over 98 percent in parts of South America. Bee Safe began deploying the mosquitoes in June and plans to release 600,000 by the end of the season.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We’re definitely the first in the DMV to do this… It’s super cool that we’re at the forefront of it,” said Todd Montgomery, owner of Bee Safe Mosquito Control.
🎯 IMPACT: The release of the diseased mosquitoes is intended to significantly reduce the spread of mosquito-borne illnesses in the region, offering a safer alternative to chemical pesticides. However, campaigners have raised concerns that the insects could expose people to novel allergens, or inadvertently create dangerous hybrid mosquitoes that are not rendered infertile and enter the wild gene pool.
📺 FLASHBACK: Similar mosquito control efforts have been implemented in California and Florida by Alphabet’s Debug program, with plans to release millions of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes in those states.

Image by Stephen Ausmus.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A Silver Spring-based company is releasing diseased mosquitoes in the Washington, D.C. area, in hopes they will infect Asian Tiger Mosquitoes and reduce their numbers.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

4 hours ago
Bonkers Britain
Crime
News

Grooming Gang Ringleader Will Stay in Britain After Loophole Blocks Deportation.

A key figure in the grooming gangs scandal in the United Kingdom cannot be deported back to Pakistan despite losing his British citizenship, sparking public anger and calls for legislative change.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A Pakistani grooming gang ringleader in the United Kingdom cannot be deported from the country despite losing his British citizenship.
📰 DETAIL: Shabir Ahmed is a key figure in the Rochdale grooming gang, one of the most infamous cases in the broader grooming gang scandal in the United Kingdom. The scandal revolves around mostly Pakistani Muslim men preying on white working-class girls across the United Kingdom. The 73-year-old Ahmed was convicted of 30 child rape offenses and sentenced in 2012. Along with eight other men, he was found guilty of multiple sex offenses against children as young as 13. They groomed their victims across various takeaway restaurants in Rochdale in Greater Manchester. Ahmed is set to be released on Thursday, having only served a fraction of his sentence. While Ahmed has been stripped of his British citizenship, he cannot be deported from the country. According to a provision in the Immigration Act 1971, Commonwealth migrants who arrived in the United Kingdom before 1973 cannot be removed. As Ahmed arrived before 1973, he is exempt from deportation under the law. The Commonwealth is an association of 56 countries, most of which were colonies and dependencies of the British Empire. “Ahmed’s horrific crimes were at the heart of the grooming gangs scandal that represents one of the darkest moments in our country’s history. The most vulnerable people were abused and exploited at the hands of evil child rapists and must face the full force of the law,” said a Home Office spokesman. While Ahmed will not be deported, he will remain on the sex offenders register for life. Ahmed will be subject to curfews and exclusion zones, with an electronic tag to track his movements. He will also be barred from contacting any young person, required to live in supervised accommodation, and will be barred from re-entering the country if he leaves.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This depraved paedophile should have been deported to Pakistan years ago. The people of Rochdale want him booted out of the country and it’s simply unacceptable that the government of Pakistan are refusing to take him back. If the Citizenship Act needs to be amended to do that, ministers should look at doing just that.” – Paul Waugh, Member of Parliament (MP) for Rochdale.
🎯 IMPACT: The Ministry of Justice will impose exclusion zones and other measures on Ahmed, which is expected to cost the British taxpayer thousands. The inability to deport Ahmed has led to public frustration and calls for legislative changes. The government has also faced renewed pressure to negotiate the return of grooming gang members to their countries of origin. This story may complicate Labour MP for Makerfield and prospective Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s bid for the Labour leadership. Burnham previously served as Mayor of Greater Manchester, during which time he was criticized for his approach to the grooming gangs. Maggie Oliver, a former Greater Manchester Police (GMP) officer turned whistleblower, accused Burnham earlier in May of failing to engage with survivors and orchestrating a cover-up of the grooming gang scandal. “[It] was actually a cover-up… They did not speak to a single victim or a single survivor who had been caught in the last seven years… We missed a huge opportunity to bring changes that are needed,” said Oliver at the time.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A key figure in the grooming gangs scandal in the United Kingdom cannot be deported back to Pakistan despite losing his British citizenship, sparking public anger and calls for legislative change.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

5 hours ago
Bonkers Britain
News

Muslim-Only ‘Theme Park Experience’ Regnites Debate Over ‘Two-Tier’ Britain.

A theme park in England is under fire for hosting a community-organized event marketed as exclusive to Muslims, sparking debates over fairness and inclusivity.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Gulliver’s Land, a theme park in the English city of Milton Keynes, has been criticized for hosting an event marketed as a “Muslim Theme Park Experience,” featuring halal vendors, Islamic stalls, and exclusive access. Promotional materials described the event as primarily for the Muslim community, sparking accusations of exclusion and double standards.
📺 DETAIL: Promotional material described the event as being reserved for the Muslim community, prompting criticism on social media. In response, a local community hub said the event was independently organized to bring the Muslim community together, similar to other community-led gatherings, and claimed that people of all faiths and backgrounds were welcome to attend, provided they respected the event’s purpose. Critics questioned whether similar events marketed exclusively toward Christian or White English communities would receive the same acceptance, with some calling for a boycott of the theme park.
🎯 IMPACT: The incident has reignited debates over multiculturalism, inclusivity, and “two-tier” double standards in public spaces and public life. In the worst examples in Britain, these can take the form of the British state treating people differently on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, and especially race, with official police guidance explicitly stating that different groups should be treated differently in order to achieve “equality of policing outcomes.” Many believe that this ideology, which typically manifests as anti-white and anti-male discrimination, contributed to the wrongful arrest of white murder victim Henry Nowak, who was put in handcuffs as he died because police believed his Sikh killer’s claims that he had been racist without question, while dismissing his pleas that he had been stabbed.
📺 FLASHBACK: Similar controversies to the Muslim-only theme part experience have occurred in Britain, such as landlords advertising “Muslim-only” housing, which is supposed to be against the law. In Texas, a taxpayer-funded waterpark also faced backlash for a “Muslim-only” event in March.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A theme park in England is under fire for hosting a community-organized event marketed as exclusive to Muslims, sparking debates over fairness and inclusivity.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

6 hours ago
Immigration
News
World

Spain Faces 1.3 Million Migrant Amnesty Requests Ahead of Deadline.

Spain’s asylum system has been flooded with roughly 1.3 million applications ahead of the deadline later this month, following the far-left government’s plan to grant mass amnesty to illegal migrants in the country. It was claimed that only 500,000 would apply.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Approximately 1.3 million illegal migrants have applied for Spain’s mass amnesty program as the month-end deadline approaches.
📺 DETAIL: The Spanish government, led by far-left Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, began accepting amnesty applications in April. Applicants who qualify for asylum will receive legal residency and work permits, among other benefits. The program application deadline is June 30. Despite warnings earlier in the year that the number of applications could reach up to 1.3 million, the government insisted that only around 500,000 migrants would be considered. However, new data from Mercurio, the platform used to record and process the applications, suggests the number is well above one million and may include applications with forged documents. The final figures will reportedly be released the same week as the deadline, potentially as early as Tuesday. The government will also reportedly release a study on the “economic impact… resulting from the addition of many people who are now eligible for employment contracts” alongside the final figures.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The undocumented [sic] population is difficult to measure, but the police, who have better data, have already said it would exceed 1.3 million… These are the applicants; the criteria applied to accept or reject them will be another matter entirely.” – María Miyar, Director of Social Studies at Funcas, a non-profit, in an interview with El País, a Spanish-language newspaper.
🎯 IMPACT: The overwhelming number of applications poses challenges for Spanish authorities, who must resolve all applications within three months. The decision is likely to cause further strain on social services and ignite opposition from much of the electorate. This is likely to compound the unprecedented demographic change being caused by immigration in Spain. Earlier this month, it was reported that approximately 20 percent of Spain’s elementary and secondary pupils come from migrant families, according to recent data from the country’s Education Ministry.
📺 FLASHBACK: Earlier this month, it was reported that social services in Spain are on the verge of collapse following the decision to grant mass amnesty, after the number of applicants reached approximately one million, roughly double what was predicted.

Image via European Union.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Spain's asylum system has been flooded with roughly 1.3 million applications ahead of the deadline later this month, following the far-left government's plan to grant mass amnesty to illegal migrants in the country. It was claimed that only 500,000 would apply.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

15 hours ago
Data
News
Politics

Poll Reveals Just 8% of Democrats View America as the ‘Greatest’ Country.

A new poll highlights the stark differences in patriotism between Democrats and Republicans, with the former having a far more negative view of their country ahead of its 250th anniversary celebration.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A new poll has revealed that only eight percent of Democrats consider the United States of America the “greatest” country on Earth, compared to over half of Republicans.
📺 DETAIL: According to a poll carried out by YouGov, only eight percent of Democrats regard the United States as “the greatest” country on Earth. By contrast, 52 percent of Republicans regard it as the greatest country in the world. Twenty-five percent of Americans overall regard the United States as “the greatest” country in the world. Twenty percent of respondents said it is “among the greatest” and 12 percent said it was “better than average.” Meanwhile, compared to other countries, 23 percent of Democrats regard the United States as “worse than average” and 15 percent regard their country as “among the worst.” Four percent of Democrats believe that the United States of America is “the worst” country in the world. By contrast, 54 percent of Trump voters specifically called the United States “the greatest” country on Earth. Zero percent of Trump voters rated it as “the worst.” Roughly 1 in 5 people who voted for Kamala Harris in 2024 described the U.S. as “among the worst” countries in the world. In addition, 26 percent of liberals called the U.S. “worse than average,” while 53 percent of conservatives described their country as “the greatest.” The poll asked 1,679 people and was conducted between June 19 and June 22, 2026.
🎯 IMPACT: The survey underscores a stark and growing divide in how Americans perceive their country. Specifically, Democrats and self-described liberals are distinctly unpatriotic, even as the United States nears its 250th Anniversary on July 4, 2026. Such sentiment shows how patriotism has become a partisan and ideological issue, rather than something that cuts across partisan and ideological lines.
📺 FLASHBACK: Earlier this month, it was reported that at least five people had been arrested for allegedly vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington, D.C. Among those arrested was David Hearn, a 67-year-old former Olympic canoeist and avid donor to the Democrats. The donations were processed by ActBlue, a platform that has previously faced investigations over alleged foreign donor fraud. Hearn was arrested and charged with a misdemeanor. The vandalization of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool is seen by many as part of a growing trend of attacks on public memorials ahead of celebrations on July 4. Earlier this month, the National Mall in Washington, D.C. was the site of a similar act of vandalism.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new poll highlights the stark differences in patriotism between Democrats and Republicans, with the former having a far more negative view of their country ahead of its 250th anniversary celebration.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

16 hours ago
News
Science

China Secretly Launches Mysterious ‘Unidentified Object’ from Space Plane.

China’s secretive Reusable Experimental Spacecraft has released an unidentified object into orbit, prompting speculation about its purpose and potential implications for global space security.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: China‘s secretive reusable Shenlong, or “Divine Dragon,” space plane has reportedly released another unidentified object into low Earth orbit during its ongoing fourth mission, bringing the total number of payloads it has deployed since 2022 to at least nine. The detection occurred when radar equipment in New Zealand confirmed the release and identified the object as originating from the spacecraft.
📺 DETAIL: The Shenlong, which launches atop vertical rockets and lands horizontally like NASA‘s retired Space Shuttle, remains largely shrouded in secrecy, with no publicly available images or official details about its design, size, or mission objectives. Shenlong first flew on a two-day test mission in 2020 before completing extended missions lasting eight months in 2022-23 and nine months in 2023-24, during which it deployed eight unidentified objects, including six released simultaneously on its third flight. Its current mission began on February 7 with a launch aboard a Long March 2F rocket from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in the Gobi Desert, and Chinese officials have provided no updates on the spacecraft’s activities, fueling continued speculation about its purpose and capabilities.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “USSF has cataloged a new object (69673) released from the Chinese spaceplane CSSHQ4 (2026-024A), which has been in orbit since Feb 7. Previous missions of the spaceplane have also released such objects, which may be small subsatellites such as cubesats.” – Professor Jonathan McDowell, Durham University’s Space Research Center
🎯 IMPACT: The incident heightens growing global concerns about the militarization of space, with China, the United States, and Russia advancing technologies capable of disrupting or seizing satellites.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

China's secretive Reusable Experimental Spacecraft has released an unidentified object into orbit, prompting speculation about its purpose and potential implications for global space security.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad