GET THE APP
Tuesday, March 31, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

May 8, 2025
Economy

Stocks Climb as Trump Secures U.S.-U.K. Trade Deal.

PULSE POINTS:

❓What Happened: President Donald J. Trump announced a new trade agreement with the United Kingdom, leading to a rise in U.S. stock markets.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Donald J. Trump, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, investors, and the U.S. Stock Market.

📍 Where & When: The announcement of the U.S.-UK trade deal was made on Thursday morning, May 8, 2025, from the Oval Office.

💬 Key Quote: Trump stated the deal will provide “billions of dollars of increased market access for American exports, especially in agriculture.”

⚠️ Impact: U.S. stock indices rose, with the S&P 500, Dow Jones, and Nasdaq all gaining. The blue-chip Dow narrowly missed exit correction territory.

IN FULL:

U.S. stock markets experienced a boost on Thursday following President Donald J. Trump’s announcement of a trade agreement with the United Kingdom. At closing, the Dow Jones had gained 254 points, or 0.6 percent. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 also rose 0.6 percent, and the Nasdaq closed up 1 percent.

After weeks of what Trump critics tried to frame as a market decline, the blue-chip Dow Jones narrowly missed exit correction territory, strongly suggesting that the volatility has been driven by a much-needed market correction. Notably, the market gains are also throwing cold water on fears that the United States has entered a bear market.

In a statement from the Oval Office, President Trump highlighted the economic benefits of the new trade deal, which promises “billions of dollars of increased market access for American exports, especially in agriculture.” He noted that the United Kingdom will remove non-tariff barriers that have previously “unfairly discriminated against American products.”

Despite the new agreement, lower tariffs on imports from Britain will remain. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed that tariffs would continue to generate $6 billion in revenue for the United States.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent informed a House committee earlier this week that the U.S. is engaged in negotiations with 17 out of 18 key trading partners. While the U.S.-U.K. deal is seen as a positive step, larger traders like China may present more significant challenges. China has reiterated its demand for the U.S. to cancel tariffs, a point of contention ahead of talks between Secretary Bessent and a Chinese delegation this weekend.

President Trump has maintained his stance on not reducing the 145 percent tariffs on Chinese goods during negotiations. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve, citing trade policy uncertainties, decided to keep its benchmark interest rate steady at 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

30 minutes ago
William Upton
Immigration
Lawfare

The Supreme Court Will Hear Arguments on Birthright Citizenship TOMORROW.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on Wednesday in what could become a landmark case, with President Donald J. Trump’s administration challenging the current interpretation of America’s birthright citizenship law derived from the 14th Amendment.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Supreme Court, President Trump, the children of illegal immigrants, the children of legal immigrants, and the lower federal courts.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Oral arguments will be heard on Wednesday, April 1, 2026.

🎯IMPACT: A number of legal experts have suggested the high court could settle on a compromise ruling that would end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants but keep it in place for the offspring of legal immigrants, based on the controversial “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” clause found in the 14th Amendment.

IN FULL

The United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on Wednesday in what could become a landmark case with President Donald J. Trump‘s administration challenging the current interpretation of America’s birthright citizenship law derived from the 14th Amendment. Just days into his second term in the White House, President Trump issued an Executive Order ending birthright citizenship, the legal concept where anyone—no matter their immigration status—born on United States soil is granted American citizenship.

Shortly after being signed, Trump’s Executive Order was challenged in federal court, which resulted in a secondary case where the Supreme Court stepped in to limit the power of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions against executive branch policies. While not ruling on the merits of the birthright citizenship case at the time, the justices ruled that inferior federal courts could enjoin the executive branch—in most cases—only by establishing a class action lawsuit, not by issuing an injunction stemming from a single case.

In July, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Trump’s birthright citizenship order after a lower court upheld it. This ruling set the stage for the Supreme Court to give the issue some finality, announcing in December last year that it would hear the case at the start of April 2026.

At stake is a major loophole in U.S. immigration law, where even the children of illegal immigrants born on American soil become citizens—creating an anchor for the parents to dodge deportation and eventually become legal residents or citizens themselves. A number of legal experts have suggested the high court could settle on a compromise ruling that would end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants but keep it in place for the offspring of legal immigrants based on the controversial “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” clause found in the 14th Amendment.

Such a ruling would likely center on the idea that illegal immigrants—due to their unlawful entry status—are not “subject” to American “jurisdiction,” whereas legal immigrants—due to holding a visa or green card, etc.—are subject to American jurisdiction. This already comports with how the U.S. generally treats criminal illegal immigrants, preferring to deport them to their country of origin due to complications with legal jurisdictions and diplomatic agreements.

The National Pulse reported in early February that President Trump warned that a ruling against his Executive Order restricting birthright citizenship would only benefit China. His comments came after the Supreme Court struck down tariffs he authorized under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

Image by Billy Wilson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

1 hour ago
Health
UK
War

Britain’s Socialized Health Service Facing Shortages Within Days Due to Hormuz Blockade.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The United Kingdom is facing potential medicine shortages due to disruptions caused by Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz amid the ongoing U.S.-Israeli war on the country.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: National Health Service (NHS) England Chief Executive Sir Jim Mackey, Independent Pharmacies Association Chief Executive Dr. Leyla Hannbeck, National Pharmacy Association Chief Executive Henry Gregg, and British patients.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The situation has developed over the past 12 to 18 months, with current impacts being reported in the UK as of late March 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We are really worried about this. We’ve already had a couple of supply shocks in the last 12 to 18 months of key supplies.” – Sir Jim Mackey

🎯IMPACT: Britain could face medicine shortages within days, with wider implications for healthcare and economic stability.

IN FULL

Britain could soon face medicine shortages because of major disruptions to global shipping routes triggered by Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz amid the ongoing U.S.-Israeli war on the country. National Health Service (NHS) England chief executive Sir Jim Mackey has warned that certain medical supplies might run out within days. “We are really worried about this. We’ve already had a couple of supply shocks in the last 12 to 18 months of key supplies,” he said.

Britain imports roughly 75 percent of its medicines and is therefore heavily dependent on international supply chains. Mackey noted that the NHS cannot simply stockpile large quantities indefinitely because many products are perishable and storage is expensive. A dedicated team has been set up to track risks across supply chains and take steps to limit any potential interruptions.

Dr. Leyla Hannbeck, chief executive of the Independent Pharmacies Association, called the situation a “perfect storm” created by rising energy costs, limited raw materials, and geopolitical instability. “The UK pharmacy sector depends heavily on imports, particularly from India and China, and ongoing pressures are already disrupting supply and risk worsening shortages without decisive action,” Hannbeck said.

Henry Gregg, chief executive of the National Pharmacy Association, said that while no medicine shortages have yet been directly linked to the conflict, price increases are already appearing and could point to bigger problems ahead. “The NHS has driven down the price of medicines over many years, which leaves the UK vulnerable in a global market,” Gregg added.

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has also sparked concerns about potential fuel and food shortages, with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) stressing that the United Kingdom is particularly vulnerable to the wider economic fallout from the crisis. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s government has said there are currently no confirmed medicine shortages caused by the Iran war, but that it is keeping a close watch on the situation.

Image by Maggie Jones.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
1A
SCOTUS

Supreme Court Overturns Colorado’s Ban on Conversion Therapy.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Supreme Court struck down Colorado’s law banning conversion therapy for minors.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Supreme Court, Christian therapist Kaley Chiles, and Colorado state officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Tuesday and impacts Colorado and at least 20 other states with similar laws.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The First Amendment stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country.” – Justice Neil Gorsuch

🎯IMPACT: The ruling effectively overturns the Colorado ban and similar laws in over 20 states, asserting free speech protections for therapists.

IN FULL

The United States Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down Colorado‘s ban on conversion therapy for minors. In a surprising eight-to-one ruling in Chiles v. Salazar, the high court found in favor of Kaley Chiles, a Christian therapist who challenged the state’s ban. Attorneys for Chiles argued the Colorado law effectively infringed on her right to help young patients who sought to align their lives with their Christian faith.

“In cases like this, it censors speech based on viewpoint. Colorado may regard its policy as essential to public health and safety. Certainly, censorious governments throughout history have believed the same. But the First Amendment stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the majority, continuing, “It reflects instead a judgment that every American possesses an inalienable right to think and speak freely, and a faith in the free marketplace of ideas as the best means for discovering truth.”

“However well-intentioned, any law that suppresses speech based on viewpoint represents an ‘egregious’ assault on both of those commitments,” the majority concluded, ordering the circuit court decision upholding the Colorado law reversed and remanded (effectively overturning the ban).

The law, adopted in 2019, prohibits “any practice or treatment” aimed at changing a minor’s “gender expressions or to eliminate or reduce sexual or romantic attraction or feelings toward individuals of the same sex.” While the law has never been enforced, it includes fines of up to $5,000 per violation and potential suspension or revocation of a counselor’s license. Notably, it exempts religious ministry practices.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the lone dissenter, delivering a summary of her opposition from the bench. Notably, the ruling impacts over 20 other states with similar laws seeking to ban conversion therapy.

Image by Joe Ravi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
Samuel Martin
UK

UK Govt Suspends Elected Member Who Criticized the End of the Right to Jury Trials.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Karl Turner, a Member of Parliament (MP) for Britain’s governing Labour Party, was suspended after criticizing government plans to scrap jury trials.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Karl Turner, Labour Chief Whip Jonathan Reynolds, and Labour Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The suspension was communicated in recent days in the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I am being told that I have had the whip suspended but I have not had any notification from the whips about this.” – Karl Turner

🎯IMPACT: The suspension highlights internal tensions within Labour over its controversial plans to scrap most jury trials.

IN FULL

Karl Turner, a Member of Parliament (MP) for Britain’s governing Labour Party, critical of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to scrap most trials by jury, has had the party whip suspended. The lawmaker stated, “I am being told that I have had the whip suspended but I have not had any notification from the whips about this. It seems journalists have been told but I have not.”

The Labour MP has been a prominent critic of Starmer’s plans to restrict jury trials to the most serious offenses. Turner has attributed his opposition to scrapping jury trials to his own acquittal by a jury after being falsely accused of a crime.

Turner, a barrister, previously criticized the decision to scrap jury trials as “undemocratic”. He also suggested David Lammy, who serves as Starmer’s Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Justice, was being “untruthful” when the latter said the decision was about fixing Britain’s backlog of legal casework.

Turner has also raised questions regarding the theft of a cell phone belonging to Starmer’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney. The phone reportedly contained potentially sensitive messages to Lord Peter Mandelson, Starmer’s now-former ambassador to the U.S., who was appointed despite his known connections to deceased child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 

Mandelson has since been arrested following revelations in the Epstein Files suggesting he leaked confidential information to Epstein while serving in the Cabinet of former Prime Minister Gordon Brown. 

Image by Chris McAndrew.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
News

Tyler Robinson’s Attorneys Continue Delay Tactics in Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Attorneys for Tyler Robinson, charged with the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk, have requested a delay in the preliminary hearing, citing what they claim is inconclusive bullet analysis results from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tyler Robinson, 22, is charged with the murder of Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors and defense attorneys are disputing evidence in the case.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The assassination occurred in September 2025 at Utah Valley University. Robinson is due back in court on April 17 for a hearing on a defense motion.

🎯IMPACT: Despite the defense claims about the bullet fragments, prosecutors note that Robinson’s DNA has been found on the rifle’s trigger, on the spent cartridge casing, and on two unspent casings found at the scene.

IN FULL

Attorneys for Tyler Robinson, 22, the man charged with the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder and conservative organizer Charlie Kirk, are now requesting a delay in the May preliminary hearing. They cite what they call an inconclusive report from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) regarding the bullet recovered during Kirk’s autopsy and a rifle found near the scene.

Importantly, the ATF report—which has yet to be released to the public—appears to be inconclusive because the bullet itself shattered after striking Kirk in the neck and subsequently hitting materials behind the TPUSA founder. Currently, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is analyzing the lead composition of the bullet fragments, which will provide further clarity on the bullet’s origins.

Notably, prosecutors have already submitted evidence that shows DNA found on the trigger of the rifle used to assassinate Kirk matches Tyler Robinson, along with the DNA found on the spent cartridge casing, and two unfired cartridges. Still, the defense attorneys from Robinson—possibly hoping to confuse potential jurors ahead of jury selection—claim that the forensic analysis shows multiple sets of DNA on the rifle. This would be expected of a weapon that was used or handled by several individuals over time. However, the defense has not explained Robinson’s DNA being found on the spent and unspent cartridges.

The defense team for Robinson has been accused of employing a number of delay tactics to drag out the trial, while fomenting conspiracy theories. Despite their demands for further DNA and forensic analysis, much of the evidence points to Robinson—including text messages from Robinson to his transgender lover, Lance Twiggs, in which he admits to the killing and states he’d “had enough of [Kirk’s] hatred.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

4 hours ago
William Upton
Economy

The U.S. National Gas Price Hit Mid Biden-Era Levels Today.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. gas prices have hit their highest level since the middle of former President Joe Biden’s term. According to AAA’s national average gasoline price, the cost per gallon hit $4.018 on Tuesday, March 31, 2026.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Former President Joe Biden, President Donald J. Trump, American consumers, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Saudi Arabia.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The price per gallon of gasoline hit $4.018 on Tuesday, March 31, 2026.

🎯IMPACT: The last time the average price per gallon of gasoline crossed $4.00 was in August 2022, after reaching over $5.00 in June of that year.

IN FULL

U.S. gas prices have hit their highest level since the middle of former President Joe Biden‘s term. According to AAA’s national average gasoline price, the cost per gallon hit $4.018 on Tuesday, March 31, 2026.

The last time the average price per gallon of gasoline crossed $4.00 was in August 2022, after reaching over $5.00 in June of that year. Notably, the spike in prices at the time was due to the sidelining of refinery workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent surge in gasoline demand when pandemic restrictions were lifted—creating an environment of low supply and sustained high consumer demand.

In the current environment, the price spike is directly tied to the ongoing U.S. military operation against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Sporadic Iranian attacks on oil tankers and fears over the possible laying of sea mines in the Strait of Hormuz have resulted in Lloyd’s of London essentially suspending insurance for international shipping moving through the critical waterway. This has effectively closed off oil and gas shipments from Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and—in part—Saudi Arabia to the rest of the world.

Concerningly, the sudden drop in global oil output due to the closure of the strait has left Europe, Asia, and Australia facing a fuel and energy crisis, with emergency reserves quickly running out. The global nature of oil pricing also means the United States—a net oil exporter—is not unaffected by the price spike. For President Donald J. Trump, the price surge has played a significant part in his collapsing voter approval numbers.

America exports most of its high-value “light sweet crude,” which fetches top dollar on international markets, and imports heavier, less expensive “heavy sour crude.” It should be noted that American refineries are designed to handle heavy sour crude, and not light sweet crude, and that the exchange is ultimately more profitable for the United States.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

5 hours ago
War

Trump Says U.S. Will Abandon Efforts to Reopen Hormuz ‘At Some Point’ But ‘Not Quite Yet.’

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump stated he is not ready to abandon efforts to force Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, despite suggesting allies should take more responsibility.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, the U.S. military, Iran, and allied nations, including the U.K. and NATO members.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump’s remarks were made during an interview on March 31, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “At some point I will, not quite yet. But countries have to come in and take care of it.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: President Trump emphasized the need for allied nations to take a more active role, while reiterating the U.S. military’s progress in the region.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump said Tuesday morning that he is not ready “quite yet” to abandon U.S. military efforts to force the Islamic Republic of Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, despite a Truth Social post suggesting that allies need to take responsibility. He expressed frustration that other countries, including the United Kingdom and other NATO members, had not sent military assets to support the U.S. military operation against Iran.

“At some point I will, not quite yet,” President Trump said regarding the possibility of the U.S. removing its presence around the Strait of Hormuz. “But countries have to come in and take care of it. Iran has been decimated, but they’re going to have to come in and do their own work.”

The President again emphasized, “I’ll be there, but if they’re having a hard time getting oil, let them come and take it like they’re supposed to. Let them come up and take it. They didn’t want to give a hand to anybody. NATO is terrible, and they’re all terrible.”

When pressed on the U.S. timeline in Iran, Trump stated, “We are two weeks ahead of schedule.” However, the President initially laid out a four-to-eight-week operation, and we’re currently in week five of military strikes against the Islamic Republic. “Iran has no military might anymore. They are down on everything they had. They’re a mess,” Trump added.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

6 hours ago
News
UK
War

Trump Tells UK: ‘USA Won’t Help You Anymore’ After Iran War Rejection.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump urged America’s allies to reopen the Strait of Hormuz themselves amid soaring oil prices.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, the British government and other allied governments, War Secretary Pete Hegseth, and the Iranian regime.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 31, 2026, concerning events in the Strait of Hormuz.

💬KEY QUOTE: “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the USA won’t be there to help you any more, just like you weren’t there for us.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Global oil prices have soared as a result of Iran closing the strait; the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned the British economy is “especially exposed”.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has told the United Kingdom to “get your own oil” and called on America’s allies to step up and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the USA won’t be there to help you any more, just like you weren’t there for us. Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil!”

The President criticized Britain in particular for doing little while Iran’s closure of the vital shipping route has driven oil prices sharply higher. “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the USA won’t be there to help you any more, just like you weren’t there for us. Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil!”

The hostile message comes at an inopportune moment, as a state visit by King Charles III to the U.S. has just been confirmed, despite opposition from many Britons. Recent tracker polls show over 80 percent of Britons have an unfavorable opinion of the U.S. leader, and only eight percent of Britons support joining offensive operations against Iran.

Trump said Britain and other allies should now either buy oil from the United States or find the resolve to secure the strait themselves. “All of those countries that can’t get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, I have a suggestion for you,” he stated. “Number 1, buy from the US, we have plenty, and Number 2, build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT.”

War Secretary Pete Hegseth backed the President’s message, calling for broader international involvement to clear the waterway. “It’s not just the U.S. Navy, last time I checked there was meant to be a big, bad Royal Navy to help as well,” Hegseth told reporters.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

20 hours ago
Crime
Immigration

Trump Admin Charges Nine in $1.1 Million Massachusetts Benefit Fraud Scheme.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Nine individuals were charged in a federal crackdown on benefit fraud schemes exploiting stolen identities to steal from taxpayer-funded programs.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The defendants include both U.S. citizens and illegal aliens, with charges involving multiple federal and state agencies.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The charges were made over nine weeks in Massachusetts, and investigations into the fraud began in December 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The accused allegedly used stolen identities belonging to U.S. citizens from Puerto Rico to steal more than $1.1 million in taxpayer-funded programs.” – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

🎯IMPACT: The alleged fraud led to nearly $9 million in uncovered benefit fraud and significant financial losses to public assistance programs.

IN FULL

A coordinated federal crackdown in Massachusetts has resulted in charges against nine suspects for social welfare benefit fraud schemes exploiting stolen identities. The schemes targeted taxpayer-funded programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), MassHealth, and Social Security benefits. The investigation, ongoing since December 2025, uncovered nearly $9 million in fraudulent activity.

“We are working hand-in-hand with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts and our other partners to identify, investigate, and to bring to justice those who perpetrate fraud against our taxpayer-funded benefit programs,” said Michael J. Krol, Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) in New England, of the anti-fraud operation. He added, “We will continue every day in this fight until we bring those responsible to justice.”

Notably, the defendants, including illegal immigrants and U.S. citizens, used stolen identities primarily from U.S. citizens in Puerto Rico. These identities were utilized to obtain government-issued identification, including Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles-issued driver’s licenses and U.S. passports, which were then used to fraudulently access public benefits.

The charged individuals include Juan Felipe Chalas, Efrain Rivera, Danis Piron Lara, Erpawi Roque Collado, John Doe, a.k.a. Wilkin Emilio Pimental Pereyra, another unidentified John Doe, Mercedes Soto Capellan, Oscar Gonzalez Melo, and Cruz Augusta Pena Arias. Their charges range from aggravated identity theft to making false statements in passport applications.

According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the accused allegedly stole over $1.1 million in taxpayer-funded programs. The schemes resulted in approximately $943,197 in total losses to public assistance programs, including SNAP, MassHealth, and Social Security benefits.

The penalties for the charges include up to 20 years in prison for unlawfully obtaining SNAP benefits, mandatory consecutive sentences for aggravated identity theft, up to a five-year sentence for the misuse of a Social Security number, and 10 years for the theft of government property.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

20 hours ago
Data
News

Newsom and the California Democrats Are Killing Los Angeles.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Tens of thousands of residents are leaving Los Angeles County, with the region recording the largest population drop in the nation between July 2024 and July 2025, according to new U.S. Census Bureau data.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Residents of Los Angeles County, neighboring counties such as Riverside and San Bernardino, and demographers analyzing U.S. Census Bureau data.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Between July 2024 and July 2025, primarily in Los Angeles County and surrounding areas in California, with the data released in March 2026.

🎯IMPACT: The population decline could lead to worker shortages, rising costs, and slower economic growth, with ripple effects on California’s labor market and economy.

IN FULL

Los Angeles County, California, has seen a significant population decline, with roughly 54,000 residents leaving between July 2024 and July 2025, according to newly released U.S. Census Bureau data. Once home to over 10 million people in 2020, the county’s population has now dropped below 9.7 million.

Neighboring regions, including Riverside and San Bernardino counties, gained more than 21,000 residents during the same period, while the Las Vegas metro area attracted over 20,000 people. However, even more troubling for Los Angeles County is that the rate of outmigration is not being offset by new residents relocating to the area—a trend that, over the long term, could severely undermine the local tax base.

Notably, the uptick in the exodus of Los Angeles County residents came as the region was devastated by wildfires in early 2025. The lack of response from city, county, and state officials—including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) and Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA)—led to 12 people killed in Pacific Palisades and another 18 in Altadena. Over 6,000 homes and buildings were destroyed, including properties owned by high-profile figures such as Paris Hilton, Tom Hanks, and Mandy Moore. The National Pulse reported in October last year that 29-year-old Jonathan Rinderknecht was arrested for setting the Pacific Palisades fire.

Meanwhile, California as a whole is grappling with population declines, with 30 out of 58 counties losing residents in 2025. A sharp drop in foreign immigrants has been a major factor, with San Diego County alone experiencing a 65 percent year-over-year decrease in foreign arrivals. This drop coincides with President Donald J. Trump’s federal crackdown on illegal immigration and ramp-up of security at the U.S. southern border.

Since 2010, nearly ten million residents have left California, with many citing the state’s housing affordability crisis, violent crime, and declining quality of life issues like rampant drug use and homelessness. The state has also come under increasing federal scrutiny for social services fraud. State auditors previously identified billions of dollars in fraudulent unemployment insurance claims and improper pandemic relief payments.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad