Wednesday, July 15, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

TIME BOMB: Gen Z is Godless, Unpatriotic, and They Don’t Want Kids.

Over the last several generations, Americans have undergone a stark and profound transformation in their beliefs and values. According to a recent poll, Gen Z — those currently aged 18-26 — are significantly less patriotic, less religious, and less likely to want children than the Baby Boomers who came three generations before them. This historic shift carries significant implications for the future.

The poll, by Public Opinion Strategies on behalf of NBC News, found that just 32 percent of Gen Z think patriotism is very important compared to 76 percent of Baby Boomers, ages 59-76. Only thirty-three percent of Gen Z agree that America is the best place to live, compared to 66 percent of Baby Boomers.

Gen Z is even less religious than it is patriotic. According to the survey, 26 percent of Gen Z say that a belief in God/religion is very important, compared to 65 percent of Baby Boomers. In 2000, just 14 percent of those ages 18-34 never attended a religious service. Today, that number has more than tripled, with 45 percent of those ages 18-34 never attending a religious service.

Similarly, just 23 percent of Gen Z think having children is very important, compared to 52 percent of Baby Boomers.

The poll shows that this seismic shift in core social values has come hand-in-hand with a change in political beliefs. The poll found that whereas just 51 percent of those over the age of 65 favor gay marriage, 84 percent of those ages 18-34 are in favor of it. More than half of those ages 18-34 — 55 percent — think society hasn’t gone far enough to end “gender discrimination,” compared to just 24 percent of those over 65. While 81 percent of those over 65 think America should address immigration with increased border security funding, just 54 percent of those 18-34 think so.

CHANGING VALUES. CHANGING PEOPLE.

Several developments can explain this profound shift in values. Much of America’s transformation into a less traditional, less conservative, and more liberal society began with the Baby Boomers in the 1960s. Three generations on, Gen Z’s beliefs are arguably the natural and inevitable consequence of decades of feminism, the sexual revolution, and anti-Americanism.

Demographic change is also a key factor in explaining these shifts. The Baby Boomer generation was born into an America that was still largely White Ango-Saxon Protestant, both in terms of values and ethnic makeup. But now, Americans’ values may be changing because Americans are changing.

According to a 2020 Pew survey, 22 percent of Gen Z have at least one immigrant parent, compared to 14 percent of Millennials. In both the West and the South, fewer than 50 percent of Gen Z are non-Hispanic white, and according to Census Bureau projections, Gen Z will be majority non-white by 2026.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ICE Detains Canadian for Assaulting Teen Girl Over Pro-Trump Clothes.

A Canadian national is facing deportation after allegedly assaulting a teenager wearing pro-Trump clothing on a New Jersey boardwalk.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A 33-year-old Canadian is facing criminal charges and possible deportation after authorities say she assaulted a teenager at Point Pleasant Beach on July 3 during a confrontationover pro-Trump and ICE-themed clothing.
📺 DETAIL: According to police, Kaitlyn Tracey approached a group of four girls, filmed the encounter, and allegedly struck one of the teenagers across the face and body after confronting them about sweatpants displaying the words “Trump” and “ICE.” Security footage helped identify Tracey, who was subsequently charged with endangering the welfare of a child, assault, harassment, and obstruction. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) later took Tracey into custody, and she is being held at the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark while her immigration status is reviewed. Her husband, Matthew Geroni, sought support for her legal defense on social media, though a GoFundMe campaign he promoted was later removed. The incident has renewed attention on politically motivated attacks targeting supporters of President Donald J. Trump. Tracey is scheduled to appear in court on August 4, although deportation proceedings could affect that timeline.
🎯 IMPACT: The incident has reignited concerns over politically motivated violence in the U.S., particularly targeting conservatives. Tracey’s legal troubles could result in her deportation.
📺 FLASHBACK: This is one of several recent incidents of violence against individuals displaying conservative symbols. In one case, a 69-year-old Army veteran died after being beaten outside his “Trump House” in Escondido, California. The most extreme cases include the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, three assassination attempts against President Trump, and a sniper ambush targeting ICE agents, the last of which resulted in first-of-a-kind domestic terror convictions against Antifa members.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A Canadian national is facing deportation after allegedly assaulting a teenager wearing pro-Trump clothing on a New Jersey boardwalk.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Eight Migration Background Men Charged in Another Grooming Gang Case.

Authorities have charged eight migration background men with a total of 41 offenses related to child sexual abuse and exploitation in Wales, spanning over a decade of alleged crimes.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Eight men have been charged with a total of 41 offenses, including rape and child sexual abuse, following an investigation into a grooming gang that operated in South Wales during the 1980s and 1990s. Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) authorized the charges after a long-running investigation by Gwent Police, known as Operation Oak.
📺 DETAIL: The men, Shafaq Mohammed, 58, Syed Mohammed Ashan Taqvi, 65, Mohammed Sheikh Abdul Hannan, 54, Kevin Lawrence, 54, Sheikh Mohammed Tahir Ullah, 73, Aminur Rahman Chowdhury, 58, Shakeel Babur, 58, and Murad Ali, 57, are accused of abusing children in Newport, Abergavenny, and Swansea between 1985 and 1996. Shafaq Mohammed faces 11 charges, while the others face between one and eight counts each, including multiple counts of rape. The Crown Prosecution Service authorized the charges following a long-running inquiry and confirmed there is sufficient evidence to prosecute in the public interest. The eight men are due to appear at Newport Magistrates’ Court on July 24. CPS Chief Crown Prosecutor Jenny Hopkins urged the public to avoid making any online comments that could prejudice the active proceedings, while police stressed their focus on supporting victims. Detective Chief Superintendent Andrew Tuck appealed for anyone with information about child sexual exploitation to come forward, promising a serious response and specialist support.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We have decided to prosecute eight men with rape and child sexual abuse charges for alleged offending… following a Gwent Police investigation into organised grooming gang activity in South Wales.” – Jenny Hopkins, Chief Crown Prosecutor

Image by David Pearson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Authorities have charged eight migration background men with a total of 41 offenses related to child sexual abuse and exploitation in Wales, spanning over a decade of alleged crimes.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Walz Defends Pardon for Deported Pedophile.

Governor Tim Walz (D-MN) has defended his decision to pardon a convicted pedophile in an attempt to thwart his deportation.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) granted a pardon to Tou Lue Vang, a Laotian national and convicted child predator, in an attempt to prevent his deportation. Vang, who was convicted of repeatedly sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl, was ultimately deported by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) regardless following an intervention by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
📺 DETAIL: Vang, who entered the United States illegally in 1994 but later obtained legal status, was ordered removed after being convicted in 2006 of repeatedly sexually assaulting a young girl between 2002 and 2004. Walz claimed Vang’s deportation did not make communities safer and argued it unfairly separated him from his U.S.-citizen children. Secretary of State Marco Rubio revoked Vang’s legal status last week, allowing ICE to deport him to Laos after the country began informally accepting deportees despite lacking a formal repatriation agreement with the U.S. under pressure from the Trump administration. The pardon was unanimously approved by Walz, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D), and Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Natalie Hudson.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Because of our action, this foreign criminal will never pose a threat to any American ever again.” – Secretary of State Marco Rubio
🎯 IMPACT: The pardon drew sharp criticism from Republicans, including Minnesota House Speaker Lisa Demuth, who emphasized the need to deport rather than pardon child predators. Secretary Rubio’s decision to revoke Vang’s legal status and enforce his deportation was praised as a victory for public safety and justice.
📺 FLASHBACK: Under the Trump administration, ICE has targeted illegal immigrants convicted of crimes, with nearly 70 percent of arrests involving aliens subject to criminal charges. Trump administration pressure on Laos has resulted in the country informally accepting deportees, with over 100 Laotians returned.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Governor Tim Walz (D-MN) has defended his decision to pardon a convicted pedophile in an attempt to thwart his deportation.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DATA: Vance Outpacing Kamala Harris and AOC in Favorability Ratings.

Vice President J.D. Vance has a higher net favorability rating than Democrats Kamala Harris and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, with similarly strong showings from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr., according to a new poll.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A new poll has revealed that Vice President J.D. Vance (R) has a higher net approval rating than both former Vice President Kamala Harris (D) and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).
📺 DETAIL: A Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll has revealed that Vice President Vance’s net favorability sits at -3 percent (40 percent favorable vs 43 percent unfavorable). This means the Vice President is more popular than Harris at -7 percent (41 percent favorable vs 48 percent unfavorable) and Ocasio-Cortez on -6 percent (30 percent favorable vs 36 percent unfavorable). The poll surveyed 1,776 registered voters and was conducted between July 11 and 12. Vance’s favorability is driven by strong support among Republicans and neutral support among independents. In contrast, support for both Harris and Ocasio-Cortez is driven overwhelmingly by Democrats. Similarly, Vice President Vance polls well with conservatives, while Harris and Ocasio-Cortez are favored by liberals. Notably, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. both had net positive approval ratings of one percent (36 percent favorable vs. 35 percent unfavorable and 41 percent favorable vs 40 percent unfavorable, respectively). Democrat Governor of California Gavin Newsom fared even worse with the public than Harris and Ocasio-Cortez, with a net favourability rating of -8 percent.
🎯 IMPACT: The poll’s findings suggest that Vice President Vance is in a strong position to run for President against leading Democrats when President Donald J. Trump completes his second term. However, the polling also shows that Secretary of State Marco Rubio is in a similar position. As such, this poll reaffirms the widespread perception that the next race for the Republican nomination for President will be between the Vice President and the Secretary of State, assuming they do not announce a joint ticket.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Vice President J.D. Vance has a higher net favorability rating than Democrats Kamala Harris and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, with similarly strong showings from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr., according to a new poll.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘Activist Judge’ Frees Cuban Hijacker Despite Deportation Order.

A Florida judge’s ruling to release a convicted Cuban hijacker after his prison term has drawn sharp criticism from DHS, citing risks to public safety and immigration enforcement efforts.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge in Florida ordered the release of Maikel Guerra Morales, a Cuban national convicted of hijacking a commuter aircraft in 2003, after he completed a 22-year federal prison sentence. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) criticized the decision, stating it forced Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to release a dangerous foreign criminal into an American community.
📺 DETAIL: U.S. District Judge John E. Steele, appointed by former President Bill Clinton, ruled on July 8 that Morales could not continue to be held in ICE custody and ordered his release within 24 hours, while allowing him to contact his attorney and family. Morales was convicted after participating in the March 19, 2003 hijacking of a commuter flight from Nueva Gerona, Cuba, during which prosecutors said he assaulted crew members and forced the pilot to divert to Key West, Florida, where he was arrested. Following his release from federal prison, ICE detained Morales in December 2025 to execute a final order of removal issued by an immigration judge in 2023. Court filings indicated ICE had sought to deport Morales, with Mexico reportedly considered as a possible destination if Cuba refused to accept him. Judge Steele claimed that continued immigration detention was not legally justified under the circumstances and ordered Morales released under supervision. DHS said it complied with the court’s order but vowed to continue pursuing Morales’ removal from the United States.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This activist judge forced ICE to release a criminal illegal alien who was convicted and sentenced to 22 years for hijacking a plane back into American communities.” – Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis.
🎯 IMPACT: DHS accuses the court of undermining efforts to remove criminal illegal aliens. ICE stated it is continuing to pursue Morales’s removal, with Mexico still being considered as a potential destination if Cuba will not accept him.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A Florida judge's ruling to release a convicted Cuban hijacker after his prison term has drawn sharp criticism from DHS, citing risks to public safety and immigration enforcement efforts.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Pushes ICE to Continue Traffic Stops After DHS Freeze.

President Donald J. Trump has defended Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) traffic stops after they were temporarily suspended by the Department of Homeland Security following ICE-related shootings.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has voiced his support for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) continuing to conduct traffic stops, contradicting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which has largely suspended them following two recent shootings.
📺 DETAIL: On Wednesday, President Trump defended ICE’s use of traffic stops as a critical tool for catching and removing foreign criminals. The President’s support for traffic stops follows a decision by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to temporarily suspend most traffic stops following backlash over two recent fatal shootings involving ICE in Texas and Maine. The President warned that suspending traffic stops would embolden criminals. “Once we do, we are playing right into the criminal’s hands,” Trump warned on Truth Social. ICE has defended its recent actions, citing resistance from migrants under deportation orders, including weaponizing their vehicles against officers. DHS has also defended traffic stops despite the announcement of a temporary suspension. The President called on ICE agents to resume their duties as normal, saying, “I.C.E., be judicious, fair and smart, and go back and do your very important job.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We must be strong, tough, and smart, and we CANNOT give up one of ICE’s most important and effective Crime Fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!” – President Trump
🎯 IMPACT: Trump’s comments contradict the decision by DHS to temporarily suspend traffic stops in response to the recent shootings. This story shows that despite mounting public pressure, the President is prepared to stand by ICE.
📺 FLASHBACK: Earlier this week, a fatal shooting in Biddeford, Maine, involving ICE was reported. The man killed was 26-year-old Joan Sebastian Guerrero, a Colombian national. Earlier this month, another ICE-related shooting was reported in Houston, Texas. The man was identified as 52-year-old Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, an immigrant from Mexico. “From information we are receiving, he rammed an ICE law enforcement vehicle, refused to follow multiple verbal commands, and weaponized his vehicle,” read a statement from DHS.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Donald J. Trump has defended Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) traffic stops after they were temporarily suspended by the Department of Homeland Security following ICE-related shootings.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

FCC Chairman Targets Elimination of TV Station Ownership Cap to Restore Balance to Media Landscape.

The FCC plans to vote to eliminate the 39 percent national ownership cap on television stations, arguing that the reform will restore balance between local broadcasters and national media conglomerates.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed eliminating the national ownership cap, which currently prevents any single entity from controlling TV stations that reach more than 39 percent of U.S. households. The new plan would replace this blanket restriction with a case-by-case review process to ensure local broadcasters can better compete with national media conglomerates.
📺 DETAIL: The national ownership cap was originally introduced to prevent national media companies from dominating local markets. However, the FCC believes that changes in the media landscape, including the rise of streaming platforms and virtual cable providers, have rendered the cap ineffective at limiting the reach of national programmers. Instead, the cap now restricts local broadcasters from scaling up to compete with national entities. “Cable channels like MSNOW can reach 100 percent of the country. Social media sites from Bluesky to X can reach 100 percent of the country. Netflix can reach 100 percent too. Same with podcasts and all other forms of digital content,” FCC Chairman Brendan Carr argued in an article published Wednesday, arguing: “[T]he 39 percent cap continues to apply uniquely to the owners of local broadcast TV stations—forcing the market out of balance.”
🎯 IMPACT: If adopted, the FCC’s proposal could empower local broadcasters to attract more investment, improve advertising revenue, and produce trusted, locally relevant programming. Without this reform, local broadcasters risk further decline, potentially mirroring the collapse of local newspapers, which suffered under similarly outdated regulations until 2017.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “When it comes to broadcast news, our country could do with a little less Hollywood and a little more local reporting from communities across the country.” – Brendan Carr, FCC Chairman
📺 FLASHBACK: The FCC’s original ownership cap was designed to prevent national media monopolies and protect local broadcasters’ ability to serve their communities. However, the rise of digital platforms has allowed national programmers to bypass these restrictions entirely, leaving local broadcasters at a competitive disadvantage.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The FCC plans to vote to eliminate the 39 percent national ownership cap on television stations, arguing that the reform will restore balance between local broadcasters and national media conglomerates.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

WATCH: Uniparty Love-In at Starmer’s Last Prime Minister’s Questions Ends With Telling Public Their Vote Belongs in the Bin.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Opposition leader Olukemi “Kemi” Badenoch have thrown their support behind “Count Binface,” the alter ego of a BBC contractor, in an election contest against Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has endorsed “Count Binface,” played by longtime BBC contractor Jonathan David Harvey, in a parliamentary by-election (special election) called by Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage. Following months of insinuations of financial wrongdoing, Farage preempted his opponents by standing down from his seat in the House of Commons in order to recontest it in a by-election and allow voters to render a verdict on his conduct. However, Starmer’s Labour Party, the notionally center-right Conservatives, and the other major political parties have all stood aside, allowing “Binface”—a perennial novelty candidate in prominent parliamentary elections—to become the establishment’s de facto anti-Farage unity candidate.
📰 DETAIL: Starmer endorsed Binface during Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, urging the public to “put your vote in the bin.” He was set up by Conservative Party leader Olukemi Olufunto “Kemi” Adegoke Badenoch, who used one of her questions at PMQs—intended to be an opportunity for lawmakers to hold the Prime Minister to account—to ask Starmer if he “agree[s] that what the country deserves is a televised debate between Nigel Farage and Count Binface,” earning peals of laughter from her nominal rivals on the Labour benches.
🎯 IMPACT: Labour and the Conservatives using PMQs, where they are supposed to be adversaries, to team up against Farage strengthens the perception that they comprise a “uniparty” with few meaningful differences. Their refusal to make a direct pitch to voters in Farage’s Clacton constituency by suggesting they should put their ballots “in the bin” has earned criticism online, with many social media users saying they are treating the democratic process with contempt.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Nothing is more apt when describing our so-called ‘liberal democracy’ than the Tories, Labour and Lib Dems uniting to tell voters that their vote belongs in the bin.” – ‘The Mercian’ on X (formerly Twitter)

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Opposition leader Olukemi "Kemi" Badenoch have thrown their support behind "Count Binface," the alter ego of a BBC contractor, in an election contest against Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Man Who Threatened to Shoot Nigel Farage in the Head Finally Arrested Following Murder of Ann Widdecombe.

A man who threatened to shoot and kill Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage weeks ago has finally been arrested following the suspected politically motivated murder of Reform spokeswoman Ann Widdecombe.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A man was arrested on Tuesday by London’s Metropolitan Police for threatening to kill Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage in a tweet dated May 8, stating, “I am going to shoot you in the head if you win.” The arrest—after a long delay—follows the murder of Reform’s Ann Widdecombe in her home last week, which is suspected to have been politically motivated.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This is the first time the police have ever proactively acted on a social media post and I hope they are looking at the other three or four hundred similar posts from this year alone.” – Nigel Farage
🎯 IMPACT: The arrest could signal a shift in how law enforcement handles the hundreds of threats against Farage and other populist figures in Britain, following the murder of 78-year-old Reform immigration and justice spokeswoman Ann Widdecombe in her home in a suspected act of terrorism.
📰 DETAIL: Farage said multiple reports of threats have been made to the police over the years, but that he is “always… told that these social media posts don’t meet the threshold, which is extraordinary.” Notably, the British authorities arrested many people over social media posts following the Southport mass stabbings, with one woman being imprisoned merely for saying she would not care if hotels housing asylum seekers were burned down. In October, an Afghan illegal immigrant who posted a video of himself on TikTok vowing to shoot Farage while preparing to board a boat to Britain was sentenced to five years in prison.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A man who threatened to shoot and kill Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage weeks ago has finally been arrested following the suspected politically motivated murder of Reform spokeswoman Ann Widdecombe.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK Govt Plans Social Media ‘Curfew’ for 16- and 17-Year-Olds.

The British government’s proposed curfew for 16- and 17-year-olds has faced criticism for its perceived ineffectiveness and ease of circumvention.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Outgoing British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is set to announce a midnight social media curfew for 16- and 17-year-olds.
📰 DETAIL: Prime Minister Starmer intends to declare a midnight social media curfew aimed at 16- and 17-year-olds. The curfew will constitute one of Prime Minister Starmer’s final acts in office before he is replaced by Labour Member of Parliament for Makerfield Andy Burnham, who has secured enough support from the Parliamentary Labour Party to become Prime Minister and Labour leader uncontested. The upcoming curfew will be “on by default” but can be turned off by users, leading to criticism of its effectiveness. The government is expected to unveil a package of measures to regulate social media access on Wednesday. The measures aim to address addictive features such as infinite scrolling. The decision follows the release of a government study which concluded that a midnight social media curfew would be “the most straightforward intervention to implement and integrate into existing household routines.”
🎯 IMPACT: The fact that the curfew can simply be turned off has seen critics dismiss it as “completely useless” and “ludicrous.” The curfew has also been widely criticized as being inconsistent with other policies of the Starmer government, which lowered the voting age to 16 last year. Despite running in the Makerfield by-election on a pledge to change the Labour Party, Burnham supports digital ID and the social media ban, which may constitute outgoing Prime Minister Starmer’s most significant policy while in office.
📺 FLASHBACK: Last month, the British Government announced a ban on social media access for children under 16. Critically, the ban requires adults to upload ID to use social media to prove that they are aged 16 or over, ending online privacy. The European Union (EU) is seeking to announce a similar measure later in the year. The government pushed forward with digital ID despite significant opposition from the public and civil liberties organizations.

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The British government's proposed curfew for 16- and 17-year-olds has faced criticism for its perceived ineffectiveness and ease of circumvention.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.