Friday, March 6, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Trial Day 14: Michael Cohen, The MeidasTouchers, And a 14-Year-Old!?

The 14th day of former President Donald J. Trump‘s Manhattan-based trial was exclusively dedicated to the defense’s cross-examination of the disbarred serial perjurer Michael Cohen. On Wednesday, Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney, Robert Costello, testified before Congress that his old client had repeatedly claimed to him that he had no evidence against Donald Trump. With most of his Tuesday testimony now in question, Trump’s lead counsel, Todd Blanche, zeroed in on more of Cohen’s lies and hammered the prosecution’s star witness over the shifting details of the disgraced lawyer’s testimony.

COHEN GETS MEIDAS TOUCHED.

The morning started with a muddled exchange about when Cohen found out about Bragg’s indictment against former President Trump. Judge Juan Merchan later sidelined much of the questioning and testimony surrounding this as attorneys on both sides struggled to clarify the timeline of events.

Next, however, Blanche entered into the evidence record a recording of the serial perjurer’s Mea Culpa podcast hosted by the far-left website MeidasTouch. Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger objected to the move but was overruled by Judge Merchan.

Cohen can be heard on the podcast recording congratulating Bragg on the Trump indictment. Additionally, Cohen states that he spent countless hours with Bragg. “You never met Alvin Bragg, right?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“Correct,” responded the disgraced lawyer. Again, Blanche, with tightly controlled questioning, elicits another instance where Cohen lied—in this case, to his audience regarding his interactions with the Manhattan District Attorney.

MOTIVATED BY REVENGE. 

The next stage of the Trump defense team’s cross-examination of Michael Cohen focused on the serial perjurer’s possible motivations for testifying against his former boss. Blanche hammered Cohen on the latter’s public statements, celebrating the chance Trump could be sent to prison.

“I truly f**king hope that this man ends up in prison,” Cohen could be heard on a podcast recording played for the jury. The disgraced attorney went on to say: “But revenge is a dish best served cold, and you better believe I want this man to go down and rot inside for what he did to my family.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he had ever said his work with prosecutors had helped get the former President indicted. “I took some credit, yes,” he replied. Trump‘s lead counsel repeated his question. “Yes, that’s what I believe,” responded Cohen.

COHEN CAN’T HELP HIMSELF.

“You continued to call President Trump various names on your podcasts and when you’re even doing CNN interviews, correct?” Blanche asked next, and Cohen admitted he did. Cohen was then presented with his April 21, 2024, TikTok post just before the trial began. In the video, Cohen states he has “mental excitement about the fact that this trial was starting.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he knew a paralegal was monitoring his social media. “That didn’t stop you, did it?” Blanche pressed Cohen. “No, sir,” he replied.

Trump’s defense team hit Cohen hard on both Tuesday and Thursday for his lack of self-control and inability to follow instructions. Blanche’s strategy appears to be to illustrate to jurors that Cohen is motivated only by his own self-perception and selfish desires. Beyond his simply profiting from the trial, Blanche is underscoring that Cohen often acts on his own with disregard for how his actions affect others.

LIES, LIES, AND MORE LIES.

Again taking aim at Cohen’s credibility, Blanche walked the disbarred attorney through multiple past instances where he was proven to have lied before courts, lawyers, and Congress. “Was that oath that you took every single time, so going back to all the depositions, the same oath that you took Monday morning in this courtroom?” Blanche asked, with Cohen responding: “Yes, sir.”

“And each time you met with a federal agent you were told that if you made a false statement that that was a felony, a federal crime, correct?” Blanche continued. Again, Cohen responded: “Yes, sir.”

Blanche next focused on Cohen’s lies before the House Intelligence Committee in 2017. “There were a couple of different lies?” he asked Cohen, the latter responding: “That’s correct.”

Cohen admitted to Blanche that he had lied under oath to the Congressional committee and lied again when he met with the special counsel in April 2018.

WHOSE FAULT IS IT?

Trump’s lead defense counsel pressed further, again trapping Cohen into admitting that he lied because of what he perceived he should do. “You said you were accepting responsibility for those lies, for lying to Congress. But in fact, you repeatedly said — and even said this morning, and even this week — that the reason why you lied was because of your loyalty to President Trump,” Blanche asked.

“I worked with a joint defense agreement, and we crafted the two-page document in order to stay on message — the message we all knew Mr. Trump wanted, including Mr. Trump’s attorney at the time,” Cohen replied. Blanche followed up, asking the disgraced attorney: “So are you saying you’re accepting responsibility or blaming the joint defense agreement?”

Cohen begrudgingly admitted on the stand, “I accepted responsibility, I read it, and I submitted it to the committee.”

UNTRUE VERSUS A LIE.

Blanche grilled Cohen about whether federal prosecutors threatened him or tried to induce him to plead guilty to a series of 2018 tax evasion charges. “Nobody induced you or threatened you to plead guilty, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“As I stated previously, I was provided 48 hours within which to accept the plea, or the Southern District of New York was going to file an 80-page indictment that included my wife. And I elected to protect my family,” the disgraced lawyer responded. Blanche pressed Cohen again about his characterization of interactions with federal prosecutors.

Cohen responded the second time, “I never denied the underlying facts; I just did not believe that I should have been criminally charged for either of those six offenses.”

Blanche pushed back, asking Cohen if there was a difference between him saying something untrue and stating a lie. “I was using just different terminology,” Cohen replied.

“So it was a lie?” Blanche asked. Cohen responded: “Correct.”

WHAT ABOUT BOB?

Much of Blanche’s cross-examination of Cohen seems to be setting up Robert Costello as — possibly — the singular defense witness. Costello is Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney who has, in recent days, told both Congress and several media outlets that his former client is lying on the stand.

The questioning regarding Cohen’s interactions with federal prosecutors is especially pertinent as Costello testified before Congress directly on conversations he had with his client about the federal tax charges. On Wednesday, The National Pulse reported that Costello said: “I explained that if Cohen had truthful information that would implicate Donald Trump, I could get him out of his legal troubles by the end of the week.” He added: “I emphasized that any information Cohen could give would have to be truthful, otherwise it was useless.”

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,’” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

LYING TO A FEDERAL JUDGE.

Trump’s lead defense counsel next addressed Cohen and the fact that the disbarred lawyer had lied to a federal judge. “You testified under oath at a different trial that you did not commit the crimes that you pled guilty to before Judge Pauley, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen, referring to the latter’s perjury before the late U.S. District Court Judge William H. Pauley III.

“Correct,” answered Cohen.

Blanche, citing Cohen’s own words, asked the serial perjurer if it was true that he lied to Judge Pauley because “the stakes affected you personally?” Cohen confirmed to Blanche this was true. Pushing further, Blanche pressed Cohen as to why—during his 2019 testimony before Congress—the disgraced lawyer didn’t tell lawmakers he had lied to the federal judge.

“By not telling Congress or the Senate that you had lied under oath, do you believe that you were omitting important information?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen, and Judge Merchan again overruled the prosecution‘s objection.

“I don’t believe I was asked the question,” Cohen said.

BLAME GAME. 

As the morning’s cross-examination began its final stretch, Blanche focused on Cohen‘s refusal to take responsibility for his actions. “You blame a lot of people over the years for the conduct that you were convicted of,” Blanche told Cohen. The disgraced lawyer responded: “I blame people, yes.”

Blanche proceeded to rattle off a list of people and institutions that Cohen has pointed the finger at for his crimes over the years. These included Cohen’s accountant, bank, federal prosecutors, federal judges, and Donald Trump. Cohen admitted he had blamed each one.

Observers in the courtroom described Cohen as appearing angry and annoyed as Blanche pressed him on every person he’s blamed and his prior convictions for tax evasion and perjury.

A JILTED LAWYER.

Blanche shifted gears again, focusing on the 2016 presidential transition and Cohen’s disappointment at being left behind in New York City. Blanche asked Cohen if it was true that he wanted to serve as the White House chief of staff. “I would have liked to have been considered for ego purpose,” Cohen responded.

After former President Trump tapped Reince Priebus to serve as his chief of staff, Cohen admitted to Blanche that he was disappointed. Blanche then presented Cohen with texts between the latter and his daughter. In the text, Cohen told his daughter that he was with Trump at that very moment and that “he wants me to go, just not sure the position,” insinuating that he’d be joining the President in Washington, D.C.

This line of question is important because, as others have testified, Cohen was not seriously considered for any role in the White House or approached about a role. Blanche likely intended this inquiry to reinforce Cohen’s penchant for lying, even to his own daughter. Additionally, the moment further proved that Cohen has an almost delusional opinion of himself and his actions.

“Did you express disappointment to Pastor Scott repeatedly that President Trump hadn’t brought you into the administration?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen. The prosecution’s witness responded annoyedly: “Not into the administration — I knew the role I wanted… I may have expressed frustration.”

When Blanche pressed Cohen as to why he needed someone to put in a good word for a role in the White House when Cohen claimed he talked to Trump almost every day, the disgraced lawyer said, “It’s always good to have somebody else advocate.”

PRANKED BY A TEENAGER.

Just before the lunch break, Trump‘s defense team took aim at one of the prosecution and Cohen’s key claims. Blanche presented Cohen with a series of text and call logs that Cohen had claimed were him reaching out to Trump regarding the resolution of the Stormy Daniels hush money payment. Trump’s lead counsel contended that rather than reaching out to Trump, Cohen was actually calling Trump’s bodyguard, Keith Schiller, for help dealing with a series of harassing phone calls he was receiving from a 14-year-old prankster. The texts between Cohen and Schiller appear to indicate that the latter was indeed the case.

However, Cohen insisted to Blanche that the prankster wasn’t all that he discussed on the calls, stating: “I know that Keith was with Mr. Trump at the time and there was more potentially than this.” A skeptical Blanche, noting the short amount of time over which the texts and calls took place, asked Cohen if he really “had enough time to update Schiller about all the [harassment] problems you were having and also update President Trump about the status of the Stormy Daniels situation because you had to keep him informed?”

“I always ran everything by the boss immediately, and in this case, it would have been saying, ‘Everything has been taken care of — it’s been resolved,'” Cohen responded.

LAWYER OR PR GUY?

The post-lunch cross-examination continued with Blanche pressing Cohen on whether he frequently worked to drive positive stories for Donald Trump. Cohen testified that he would often work place positive stories and that Trump would “blow up” if he failed. At this point, former President Trump visibly shook his head “no” as Cohen spoke.

“It was my routine to always advise Mr. Trump because the story that I was going to put out is not the way he would want it. One, it would cause him to blow up at me, and two, it would probably be the end of my job,” Cohen told Blanche. Again, it appears Blanche’s strategy was to portray Cohen as someone who viewed their role as something more ‘connected‘ than it was.

A CAMPAIGN SURROGATE?

In the next series of questions, Cohen was pressed on whether he ever had a role in the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. Former Trump campaign aide Hope Hicks testified earlier in the trial that Cohen was not a part of the campaign but would often try and interfere with the campaign staff.

Cohen testified that while he wasn’t a campaign staff member, he was a “surrogate.” The serial perjurer, however, has not produced any documentation or evidence of this role being in any official capacity.

“Your testimony is the frustration toward you that didn’t come from President Trump; it came from the campaign staffers?” Blanche asked Cohen. He replied, “Correct.”

COHEN FALLS APART.

As the fourteenth day of trial testimony neared its end, Cohen inadvertently may have crushed District Attorney Alvin Bragg‘s case. Prosecutors have maintained that the hush money payments were campaign expenditures and not legal fees, as Trump’s only concern was about the Stormy Daniels story’s impact on the 2016 election.

However, when discussing the 2011 blog post marking the first public allegations regarding an affair with Stormy Daniels, Cohen admitted Trump was worried about the impact the story would have on his family. “Fair to say that the first time you heard about that and the story by Ms. Daniels, when you talked to President Trump about it, he said he was worried about what his family would think, correct?” Blanche asked.

“Yes, as well as, of course, for the brand,” Cohen admitted. Blanched continued to press Cohen, addressing his 2021 conversation with law enforcement: “The first thing that President Trump said to you was that his family wouldn’t like that very much?”

“That’s true,” Cohen replied.

After Blanche rehashed additional details of conversations Cohen allegedly had with Trump and other associates, the court adjourned at 4PM with Cohen’s cross-examination set to continue on Monday.

You can read The National Pulse’s Day Thirteen trial coverage here, and if you find our work worthwhile, consider joining as a supporter.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘Abdulkarim Farah’ Jailed for Trying to Bribe Juror in Minnesota Fraud Case.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Abdulkarim Farah of Minneapolis was sentenced to 57 months in prison for attempting to bribe a juror in a high-profile fraud case.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Abdulkarim Farah, his brothers, co-defendant Ladan Ali, and “Juror 52” were key figures in the case.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The bribery attempt occurred during a trial beginning April 22, 2024, in Minnesota.

🎯IMPACT: The case highlights the importance of safeguarding the integrity of the justice system and the role of impartial juries.

IN FULL

Abdulkarim Farah of Minneapolis, Minnesota, has been sentenced to 57 months in federal prison followed by one year of supervised release after attempting to bribe a juror during the first trial connected to the massive Feeding Our Future fraud case. The largely Somali-led nonprofit sat at the center of a pandemic-era scheme that prosecutors say stole more than $250 million in taxpayer funds intended to provide meals to children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

According to federal prosecutors, Farah worked with his brothers and other associates to influence the trial’s outcome by offering money to “Juror 52” in exchange for a not-guilty verdict. The bribery attempt occurred during a trial that began April 22, 2024, involving seven defendants, including two of Farah’s brothers, before U.S. District Judge Nancy E. Brasel.

Court filings state that Farah monitored Juror 52 and the juror’s home, shared logistical information with co-conspirators, and coordinated the delivery of the bribe with co-defendant Ladan Ali. On June 2, 2024, Farah drove Ali to the juror’s residence, where she delivered a gift bag containing cash to a relative of the juror and promised additional payments if the juror voted to acquit. Investigators later found that Farah deleted the Signal messaging app from his phone in an effort to destroy evidence.

U.S. District Judge Eric C. Tostrud sentenced Farah to the high end of the federal guidelines. During sentencing, the judge emphasized the importance of juries to the justice system, describing “properly functioning juries” as a cornerstone of criminal courts, and commended Juror 52 for refusing the large cash bribe.

The Feeding Our Future case has become one of the largest fraud scandals in the United States. Payments to the nonprofit surged during the pandemic as it claimed to be distributing millions of meals through dozens of affiliated sites across Minnesota.

Federal investigators have charged 98 people in connection with the scheme. According to congressional oversight findings cited in early 2026, 85 of those defendants are Somali.

The case has also prompted broader scrutiny of organized fraud networks tied to pandemic relief programs in Minnesota. Investigators and lawmakers have raised concerns about underground financial networks moving large sums of money through U.S. airports and allegations that proceeds from fraud operations have been connected to activist movements in Minneapolis.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Tariffs Working: China Sets Weakest Economic Growth Target in Decades.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: China announced its 2026 GDP growth target at 4.5-5 percent, the lowest benchmark since 1991, signaling a shift to slower economic growth.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced at the opening of the National People’s Congress on Thursday in Beijing’s Great Hall of the People.

🎯IMPACT: The lower target is a sign of structural issues in China’s export-heavy economy, which has been hit by President Trump’s efforts to disincentivise cheap imports in favor of products made by American workers.

IN FULL

China has set its lowest economic growth goal in decades, signaling a shift in strategy as the country confronts mounting domestic and international pressures. Speaking at the opening session of the National People’s Congress in Beijing, Chinese Premier Li Qiang announced a GDP growth target of 4.5 percent to five percent for the year. Delivered at the Great Hall of the People, the benchmark marks the first time since 1991 that China has set a national growth target below five percent.

China continues to grapple with a struggling property sector, persistent deflationary pressures, weak domestic consumption, and a cooling labor market. Urban youth unemployment remains elevated at roughly 16.5 percent, reflecting mismatches between job creation and workforce skills.

For decades, China’s rapid expansion was driven by exports and heavy infrastructure investment. That model is increasingly losing momentum. Although the country recorded net exports of about $1.2 trillion in 2025, economists say the returns from export- and investment-led growth are diminishing. Policymakers are now emphasizing longer-term strategies, including boosting household consumption and investing in advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics.

Li acknowledged the country faces a “grave and complex landscape” of internal and external challenges, while noting that the government officially met its five percent growth target in 2025. Notably, analysts have questioned the accuracy of those figures, suggesting actual economic expansion may have been closer to under three percent.

Chinese officials have acknowledged that tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald J. Trump to protect American workers from unfair competition have significantly damaged sectors of the communist country’s export-driven economy. Broader global supply-chain shifts and trade rebalancing have further challenged China’s manufacturing dominance.

Earlier this week, China called on the United States and Israel to halt military strikes on Iran, highlighting concerns about regional instability and its potential impact on global trade and energy markets. China imports a significant amount of oil and oil-related products from Iran.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

War Sec Hegseth Tells The National Pulse the Iran War is ‘Simplifying,’ Not ‘Expanding,’ as Tehran Alienates Neighbors.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: War Secretary Pete Hegseth asserted that the United States has ample munitions for operations against Iran, and said the war is “simplifying” rather than “expanding” as the Islamic Republic continues to strike its neighbors.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: War Secretary Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Admiral Bradley Cooper.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 5, 2026, at the Central Command (CENTCOM) headquarters in Tampa, Florida.

💬KEY QUOTE: “o this idea that it’s expanding, no, it’s actually simplifying in a number of ways, exactly what we need to achieve.” – Pete Hegseth

🎯IMPACT: The Iran war may be aligning the region more with the U.S. than previously, due to Iran’s erratic retaliatory strikes encompassing previously neutral states.

IN FULL

War Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed concerns about U.S. military stockpiles and the expansion of the Iran war on Thursday, stating unequivocally that the United States has “got no shortage of munitions” and that the war is actually “simplifying” rather than “expanding.”

Speaking at a press conference at Central Command (CENTCOM) headquarters in Tampa, Florida, Hegseth said, “Our stockpiles of defensive and offensive weapons allow us to sustain this campaign as long as we need,” appearing to contradict claims by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that the U.S. military needs Ukrainian interceptor drones, and that he is pressuring Washington to give him more Patriot missiles in exchange.

Questioned by The National Pulse’s Pentagon correspondent, Will Upton, about potentially coordinating attacks with Azerbaijan, a neighbor of Iran planning to join the war after a drone strike on one of its airports, Hegseth argued that Iran’s often erratic retaliatory actions across the region are inadvertently drawing more countries into alignment with the U.S.

“What Iran is doing by attacking allied countries that would otherwise want to stay out of this” is pulling them “into the American orbit,” Hegseth said. “So, now you’ve got UAE and Qatar and Bahrain and Saudi and Kuwait and others saying, ‘Hey, we’re with you, we’ll shoot with you, we’ll fly with you, we’ll defend you,” he explained, saying Iran’s actions were “actually firming up the unity of the resistance” to its regime.

“So this idea that [the war is] expanding, no, it’s actually simplifying in a number of ways, exactly what we need to achieve,” the War Secretary added.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Says ‘Cuba’s Going to Fall,’ Mulls ‘Friendly Takeover.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Trump predicted the imminent collapse of Cuba’s communist regime.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump, Cuban government, U.S. military, former Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 2026, interview with Politico, Cuba, Venezuela, U.S.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Cuba’s going to fall too.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: U.S. actions in Venezuela have intensified pressure on Cuba, leading to severe economic instability.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has expressed strong confidence that Cuba’s communist regime is approaching its end. He tied this prediction to recent U.S. military action in Iran and the forcible removal of Venezuela’s now-former president.

“People are loving what’s happening,” he insisted with respect to Operation Epic Fury in Iran, adding: “Cuba’s going to fall too.”

“We cut off all oil, all money or we cut off everything coming in from Venezuela, which was the sole source. And they want to make a deal,” he said, adding when asked if his administration was intentionally accelerating the Cuban regime’s demise, “Well, what do you think?”

Trump highlighted the U.S.’s previous intervention in Venezuela, where American forces captured the now-former Marxist narco-dictator, Nicolás Maduro. That move has cut off a major lifeline for Cuba, which has long depended heavily on Venezuelan oil and financial support.

Cuba is now facing serious fuel shortages and widespread power outages, made much worse by the sudden end of Venezuelan assistance. Trump noted that U.S. officials are currently in discussions with the Cuban leadership as the island nation seeks help.

President Trump suggested a peaceful path forward might still be possible, stating, “Maybe we’ll have a friendly takeover of Cuba.”

Image by Pierre Marshall. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Congressman Confirms Affair With Staffer Who Later Burned Herself to Death.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Texas Congressman Tony Gonzales (R) admitted to having an affair with a staffer who committed suicide last year.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Congressman Tony Gonzales, deceased staffer Regina Santos-Aviles, and the House Ethics Committee.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The admission was made during an interview released on March 4, 2026, on The Joe Pags Show.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There was a lack of faith, and I take full responsibility for those actions.” – Tony Gonzales

🎯IMPACT: Gonzales is under investigation by the House Ethics Committee and faces calls to step down, while continuing his campaign for re-election.

IN FULL

U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX) has admitted to having an affair with former congressional staffer Regina Santos-Aviles, who died by suicide in 2025. Gonzales made the admission during an interview on The Joe Pags Show, which aired on Wednesday. During the interview, Gonzales acknowledged the relationship and accepted responsibility for his actions, which could violate House rules prohibiting sexual relationships between members of Congress and staff under their supervision. Reflecting on the situation, he said, “There was a lack of faith, and I take full responsibility for those actions.”

Gonzales also said he has reconciled with his wife, Angel Gonzales, with whom he shares six children. He added that he believes God has forgiven him. The House Committee on Ethics is reviewing whether Gonzales violated the House Code of Official Conduct or other congressional standards.

Santos-Aviles, who served as a district director in Gonzales’s office, reportedly told another staffer in text messages that “I had affair with our boss.” Screenshots later published and additional messages released by her widower appeared to support the claim. In one exchange, Gonzales allegedly asked her for a “sexy pic,” which she declined. Ultimately, she attempted suicide by setting herself on fire, and died from her injuries.

Gonzales initially denied the accusations, describing the claims as “completely untruthful.” However, after the messages surfaced and scrutiny intensified, he publicly acknowledged the affair.

The controversy has emerged during a difficult reelection campaign. Gonzales is currently facing a Republican primary runoff against Brandon Herrera, scheduled for May 26. Despite calls from some lawmakers, including members of his own party, to resign, Gonzales has vowed to remain in the race.

The situation has also drawn comparisons to other recent controversies involving alleged workplace relationships in government. One example involves Democrat prosecutor Fani Willis, who faced scrutiny after allegations surfaced that she had an undisclosed relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Left Politician RESIGNS After Husband’s China Links Exposed.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Joani Reid, a Member of Parliament (MP) for British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, resigned the Labour whip after her husband was arrested on suspicion of spying for China.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Joani Reid, husband David Taylor, fellow accused Labour spies Matthew Aplin and Steve Jones, the Metropolitan Police, and China.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 5, 2026, in London and Wales.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This week has been the worst of my life.” – Joani Reid

🎯IMPACT: Reid will not sit as a Labour MP until investigations are concluded.

IN FULL

Joani Reid, a Member of Parliament (MP) for British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer‘s Labour Party, has resigned the Labour whip following the arrest of her husband, David Taylor, on suspicion of spying for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Taylor, along with fellow alleged Labour spies Matthew Aplin and Steve Jones, has been accused of assisting a foreign intelligence service.

Reid stated, “This week has been the worst of my life. The shock of recent days has been difficult for me and my family.” She insisted she is “not under investigation by the police” personally, adding: “I have done nothing wrong.”

“I understand that speculation and gossip is fevered at a time like this. I do not want the circumstances that I and my family find ourselves in to be a distraction for this government, of which I am proud and in whom I believe,” Reid said, claiming she has suspended herself from the Labour whip “voluntarily.”

Taylor, a former adviser to Welsh Labour politicians, was arrested in London. Aplin and Jones were arrested in Pontyclun and Powys in Wales. All three have been released on bail until May, with ongoing enquiries by the Metropolitan Police, supported by counter-terror police in Wales and Scotland.

Notably, Prime Minister Starmer has himself recently returned from a controversial trip to China, insisting it is important to build ties with the communist dictatorship. He is also in the process of attempting to surrender sovereignty over the Chagos Islands, which include the strategic British-American Diego Garcia military base, to China-allied Mauritius.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Zelensky Threatens to Give Orban’s Address to Ukrainian Military.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky issued a thinly veiled threat to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, saying he will give the populist leader’s address to the Ukrainian military if he blocks European Union (EU) funding for Ukraine.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban.

📍WHEN & WHERE: March 5, 2026; Kiev, Ukraine.

💬KEY QUOTE: “[W]e will simply give the address of that person to our Armed Forces—our guys can call him and speak to him in their own language.” – Volodymyr Zelensky

🎯IMPACT: The incident highlights the escalating tensions between Ukraine and Hungary, with Zelensky accused of imposing an “oil blockade” on Hungary and Orban threatening to block tens of billions of dollars in EU aid for Ukraine in return.

IN FULL

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has issued a veiled threat to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban over a stalled European Union (EU) aid package worth tens of billions of dollars, suggesting Ukraine’s military will be given his address if he blocks the funds. This comes as Zelensky is accused of imposing an “oil blockade” on Hungary and Slovakia, landlocked countries that depend on supply routes passing from Russia through Ukraine for crude oil.

The dispute centers on a proposed €90 billion (~$105bn) EU loan intended to help fund Ukraine’s military and economic needs as the war with Russia continues. Zelensky underscored the urgency of approving the aid, saying: “We hope that one person in the EU [Orban] will not block the 90 billion euros—or at least the first tranche of it —so that Ukrainian soldiers receive the weapons they need. Otherwise, we will give the address of this person to our Armed Forces, to our guys. Let them call him and speak with him in their own language.”

Ukraine and Hungary are already at odds over the Druzhba pipeline, a major route carrying Russian oil to Hungary and Slovakia. The pipeline has been shut by the Ukrainians, and Orbán has warned that Hungary will end the blockade “by force.”

Orbán has also expressed skepticism about continuing large-scale financial and military support for Ukraine. In one interview, he criticized Western spending on the war, stating: “We have burned already €185 billion, and… our intention is to burn even more. So we finance a country which has no chance to win the war.”

Budapest has also opposed Kiev’s bid to join the European Union. Orbán has argued that admitting Ukraine while it remains at war would risk drawing the EU directly into the conflict, warning: “The problem is the war; if we were to integrate Ukraine into the EU, we would integrate the war.”

Security tensions have added to the strain. Ukrainian authorities recently accused Hungary of running a spy network in the Transcarpathia region of western Ukraine, which has a sizable ethnic Hungarian minority. Hungary has rejected the allegations, while accusing the Ukrainian government of repressing the Hungarian minority and language.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

BREAKING: Trump Fires Kristi Noem on Truth Social. Here’s Who Will Replace Her…

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced a change in the position of United States Secretary of Homeland Security, effectively firing Kristi Noem via Truth Social.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kristi Noem, Markwayne Mullin, and Donald Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made via Truth Social, effective March 5, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Markwayne will make a spectacular Secretary of Homeland Security.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Markwayne Mullin will take over as Secretary of Homeland Security, while Kristi Noem transitions to a new role as Special Envoy for The Shield of the Americas.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump announced a significant leadership change in his administration. Markwayne Mullin, a United States Senator from Oklahoma, is set to become the new Secretary of Homeland Security, effective March 31, 2026.

The news comes after Kristi Noem, who will move into a new role as Special Envoy for The Shield of the Americas, became embroiled in a $220 million ad-buying campaign scandal, covered here by The National Pulse.

Trump praised Noem for her service, particularly her accomplishments on border security. He expressed gratitude for her contributions, stating, “I thank Kristi for her service at ‘Homeland.'”

Markwayne Mullin, who served 10 years in the House of Representatives and three in the Senate, has been recognized as a “MAGA Warrior.” Trump emphasized Mullin’s dedication to advancing the America First agenda and his commitment to securing the border.

When Sen. Markwayne Mullin joins President Trump’s cabinet, Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt will appoint a temporary replacement within 30 days.

The appointee must be a Republican who has been a registered Oklahoma voter in that party for at least the previous five years, and they must sign a written promise not to run for the seat in the upcoming election. This interim senator would serve until the winner of the regular November 2026 Senate election is sworn in early 2027. Since Mullin’s seat is already scheduled for the 2026 ballot (where he had been seeking his first full six-year term), no separate special election is needed.

Join Pulse+ to comment below and receive exclusive email analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Fraud: Judge Accuses Walz of Lying About Order to Fund Scandal-Hit ‘Feeding Our Future’ Org.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A new Congressional report examined why Minnesota resumed funding the scandal-ridden Feeding our Future organization despite fraud concerns.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D), Attorney General Keith Ellison (D), Judge John Guthmann, and Minnesota Department of Education officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The events occurred in Minnesota, with the timeline spanning from 2018 through 2022. The Congressional hearing took place on Wednesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The Department of Education voluntarily resumed payments and informed the court that [Feeding Our Future] resolved the ‘serious deficiencies’ that prompted it to suspend payments temporarily.” – Judge John Guthmann

🎯IMPACT: Over $250 million in taxpayer funds were allegedly stolen, with dozens charged in the fraud scheme.

IN FULL

A Congressional report has renewed scrutiny of Minnesota’s decision to resume funding for Feeding Our Future, the Somali-run nonprofit at the center of what prosecutors describe as one of the largest pandemic-era fraud schemes in the United States. The report was examined during a heated House Committee on Oversight hearing featuring testimony from Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) and Attorney General Keith Ellison (D). Lawmakers questioned why the state restarted payments to the organization despite years of warning signs.

According to the committee’s findings, the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) raised concerns about Feeding Our Future as early as 2018. In March 2021, the department temporarily halted payments after identifying what officials called “serious deficiencies.” Yet just a month later, in April 2021, the state resumed funding.

Governor Walz initially suggested a court ruling forced the state to continue paying the nonprofit. “I was speechless, unbelievable that this ruling could come down,” he said.

However, Judge John Guthmann publicly disputed that explanation, saying the court did not order the payments to resume. Guthmann clarified: “The Department of Education voluntarily resumed payments and informed the court that [Feeding Our Future] resolved the ‘serious deficiencies’ that prompted it to suspend payments temporarily.”

Federal prosecutors allege that the organization and its network of partners exploited the federal child nutrition program during the COVID-19 pandemic, submitting false meal claims and fabricated records. Authorities say more than $250 million in taxpayer funds were stolen, and dozens of people have been charged.

The report also revealed internal confusion within the Minnesota Department of Education about whether it had the authority to stop payments without backing from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. State officials said they had repeatedly raised concerns with federal authorities but received little guidance. Assistant Commissioner Daron Korte acknowledged that the state likely could have halted the payments independently but feared legal challenges.

The Feeding Our Future scandal is part of a broader pattern of alleged fraud involving public assistance programs in Minnesota and the Somali community. Investigators say that fraudulent schemes linked to networks operating in the state, including cases involving Medicaid and food stamp theft, could total billions of dollars.

Political pressure has also grown in the state following the cases. Some Minnesota Republicans have called for stricter oversight and stronger penalties, including proposals to denaturalize and deport non-citizens convicted of major fraud offenses.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

This Country Just Vowed to Join the Iran War.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Republic of Azerbaijan has vowed to retaliate against Iran after claiming four drones crossed its border and injured four people.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, the Azerbaijani Armed Forces, and Iran.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred in Azerbaijan’s Nakhchivan exclave on Thursday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We will not ​tolerate this unprovoked act of terror and aggression against Azerbaijan.” – Ilham Aliyev

🎯IMPACT: Azerbaijan is preparing retaliatory measures, raising concerns about further escalation of the Iran war.

IN FULL

Azerbaijan is preparing to enter the Iran war after four Iranian drones entered its airspace, causing injuries to four people in its Nakhchivan exclave. Iran has struck Israel and a number of its neighbors with missiles and drones since U.S.-Israeli strikes commenced against it on Saturday.

Azeri President Ilham Aliyev stated, “We will not ​tolerate this unprovoked act of terror and aggression against Azerbaijan.” The President has instructed the Armed Forces to prepare to retaliate. This marks a serious blunder by the Iranian regime, with Aliyev having visited his country’s Iranian embassy to personally pay his respects to Iran’s slain Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a matter of days ago, suggesting he was not previously hostile to Tehran.

Iran’s Azeri minority, comprising around 16 percent of the country’s population, adds a complex layer to the regional dynamics, especially given Azerbaijan’s close ties with Turkey, a NATO member. Azerbaijan is a fairly formidable power by regional standards, having recently crushed the Armenian Christian breakaway republic of Artsakh, or Nagorno-Karabakh.

Image via President.az.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.