Wednesday, August 5, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Radical Biden Judge Blocks Trump Deportations, Says Policy Motivated by ‘Great Replacement’ Theory.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration’s plans to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for immigrants from Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua—bizarrely claiming, without evidence, that the administration’s policy change is motivated by racial animosity and fear of the white population’s replacement.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Court Judge Trina L. Thompson, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, and plaintiffs representing TPS immigrants from the affected nations.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on Thursday, with the case continuing as protections remain in place. A hearing is set for November 18.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood.” – Judge Trina L. Thompson

🎯IMPACT: TPS protections for the affected groups will remain in place while the case proceeds, miring the Trump administration’s mass deportation efforts in further legal battles.

IN FULL

On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Trina L. Thompson ruled against the Trump administration’s decision to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 60,000 immigrants from Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua. The judge stated that the administration’s decision was influenced by discriminatory beliefs, including the notion that non-white immigrant groups could replace white Americans.

“The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood,” Judge Thompson wrote in her order, arguing without evidence that the decision to end TPS for certain immigrants is motivated by a “discriminatory belief that certain immigrant populations will replace the white population.”

Judge Thompson, appointed by former President Joe Biden to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, further pontificated: “Color is neither a poison nor a crime.”

TPS allows immigrants to live and work for a brief period in the United States if their home countries are deemed unsafe. However, the former Obama and Biden governments abused the TPS designation, extending the deportation protection far past its intended expiration and well after the crisis impacting the migrants’ nations of origin ended.

The Trump administration had already ended protections for immigrants from countries including Venezuela, Haiti, and Afghanistan. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem argued that conditions in Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua no longer warranted protections, but the court disagreed.

Judge Thompson argued that the administration failed to conduct an “objective review of the country conditions,” claiming political violence in Honduras and the aftermath of hurricanes in Nicaragua were grounds to extend the TPS designation. She also editorialized that, in her opinion, the decision seemed tied to broader campaign rhetoric rather than legitimate policy analysis.

The protections for the affected immigrants will remain in place as the case continues, with the next hearing scheduled for November 18.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Ukraine Fails to Stop a Single Russian Missile in Overnight Barrage as Interceptors Run Low.

A massive Russian missile and drone attack against Kiev resulted in significant casualties, highlighting Ukraine’s critical shortage of missile interceptors.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: At least 17 people were killed and 44 injured after Russia launched one of its deadliest attacks on Kiev this year, firing 28 ballistic and hypersonic missiles along with 115 drones overnight, according to the Ukrainian air force, which said it failed to intercept any of the missiles. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said the deaths could have been prevented with additional Patriot missile interceptors, urging Western allies to speed up deliveries of air defense systems.
📰 DETAIL: Russia said it targeted military logistics hubs, supply centers, drone production facilities, and cargo vessels transporting weapons near the Black Sea port of Odessa, while Ukrainian officials said civilian infrastructure was struck, including warehouses, a train depot, and commercial facilities. Open-source analysts suggested some of the missiles may have been Iskander-M ballistic missiles equipped with cluster munitions, though this has not been independently confirmed. The attack was the third large-scale bombardment of Kiev in a week and came as Ukraine faces a critical shortage of Patriot interceptors, the only Western-supplied system capable of reliably defeating ballistic missiles. Ukrainian officials also warned that North Korea is expanding its military support for Russia, alleging Pyongyang has deployed a missile unit equipped with ballistic missiles and launchers to western Russia.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Ballistic missile interceptors could have saved the lives of those killed today.” – Volodymyr Zelensky
🎯 IMPACT: The attack underscores Ukraine’s urgent need for more missile interceptors. President Zelensky emphasized the dire consequences of delays in receiving anti-ballistic systems from Western allies. However, the demand comes amid reports that U.S. missile stockpiles, including Patriot systems, are dangerously low.

Image via kh.dsns.gov.ua.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A massive Russian missile and drone attack against Kiev resulted in significant casualties, highlighting Ukraine's critical shortage of missile interceptors.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Declassified Memos Reveal FBI Covertly Investigated Trump as Russian Asset After Comey Firing.

Newly declassified documents show the Federal Bureau of Investigation launched a 2017 investigation into President Donald J. Trump based on discredited allegations of collusion with Russia, despite warnings from their own agents.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigated President Donald J. Trump on false allegations after the firing of former FBI Director James Comey.
📺 DETAIL: In May 2017, the FBI opened a criminal investigation, codenamed “Oxferd Comma,” which investigated President Trump on allegations that he was a Russian asset. The investigation was launched after the President dismissed former FBI Director James Comey. The investigation was launched despite no evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russia. According to declassified records, the claims that launched the FBI’s investigation into the President originated from the Steele Dossier, a political opposition report funded by the Clinton for President campaign, released earlier that same year. The dossier contained claims that had already been disproven and dismissed, even by the FBI’s own agents. Despite this, the investigation was approved by senior FBI officials. The probe led to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, whose two-year investigation failed to substantiate any claims of collusion. It was later revealed that FBI agents Peter Strzok and William Barnett expressed doubts at the time regarding the validity of the claims before the investigation began. In 2023, Special Counsel John Durham’s report concluded that the FBI’s Russia collusion probe was unfounded and criticized the FBI for bias. 
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.” – Peter Strzok, FBI Deputy Assistant Director, in a 2017 text message regarding the investigation
🎯 IMPACT: These declassified records suggest that the FBI was determined to conclude that President Trump was a Russian asset despite a lack of evidence and pushback from agency personnel. Significantly, the investigation into claims of collusion between the President and Russia heavily disrupted the early years of the first Trump administration. The investigation heightened partisan divisions and deepened distrust of the Intelligence Community. They show that perceptions of the Intelligence Community as excessively scrutinizing President Trump without a solid foundation to do so were warranted, raising concerns about the weaponization of the federal government and its agencies.
📺 FLASHBACK: In April this year, Comey was indicted for a social media post featuring seashells arranged to form the numbers ‘86 47.’ ‘86’ is slang for remove or kill, while ‘47’ almost certainly refers to President Trump, the 47th U.S. President.

Image by Dave Newman.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Newly declassified documents show the Federal Bureau of Investigation launched a 2017 investigation into President Donald J. Trump based on discredited allegations of collusion with Russia, despite warnings from their own agents.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

London Stabbing Spree: Woman Arrested After Multiple Victims Wounded, Police Request ‘Sensitive Reporting.’

A violent stabbing spree in central London has left four men hospitalized, while a woman has been arrested on suspicion of assault and weapon possession.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Four men, aged 34, 39, 42, and 52, were stabbed in broad daylight on Endell Street in central London on Wednesday. All four victims were rushed to a major trauma center for treatment; their conditions remain unknown as of the time of publication. Police have stated that they suspect the stabbings stemmed from a “mental health related incident” and have asked for “sensitive reporting.”
👤 WHO WAS INVOLVED: A suspect described only as a 47-year-old woman has been arrested on suspicion of assault and possession of an offensive weapon. She remains in police custody.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on Endell Street, Covent Garden, at approximately 12:27 PM on August 5.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “At around 12:27hrs on Wednesday, 5 August, police were called to reports of stabbing on Endell Street, Covent Garden. Officers attended alongside the London Ambulance Service and London’s Air Ambulance. Four men – aged 34, 39, 42 and 52 – were found with stab wounds and assessed at the scene by paramedics. They have since been taken to hospital and we await an update on their injuries. A 47-year-old woman was arrested on suspicion of possession of an offensive weapon and assault. She was taken to custody where she remains. While at an early stage of the investigation, this is believed to be a mental health related incident and [we] encourage sensitive reporting in this case. Officers seized a pair of scissors at the scene.” – Metropolitan Police statement
🎯 IMPACT: The stabbing spree has raised concerns about public safety in London. A significant police presence and cordons have been established in the vicinity of the attacks. Authorities are continuing their investigation.

Image by Kidfly182.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A violent stabbing spree in central London has left four men hospitalized, while a woman has been arrested on suspicion of assault and weapon possession.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Explosive-Laden Drone Found at European Airport.

A drone carrying an explosive device caused flight suspensions at Leipzig/Halle Airport in Germany, with authorities investigating a possible connection to Ukrainian aircraft.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: German police discovered a drone carrying an explosive device at Leipzig/Halle Airport, leading to temporary flight suspensions. A robot was deployed to secure the device, which was found in the cargo operation area.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred overnight at Leipzig/Halle Airport in Saxony, Germany.
📺 DETAIL: In addition to the explosive-carrying drone, a second unidentified object reportedly collided with a cargo plane after takeoff, causing minor damage. The plane was diverted to Hanover for inspection. Some reports suggest the explosive-laden drone may have been near a Ukrainian aircraft, though details remain unclear. Significantly, these incidents come after a Chinese woman was convicted last year for informing a man spying for the Chinese government on cargo movements and flight schedules at Leipzig-Halle Airport.
🎯 IMPACT: While one runway has since been reopened, the incident highlights potential security vulnerabilities at major European airports and raises concerns about the safety of cargo operations, especially amid ongoing geopolitical tensions with Russia over Ukraine. There have been several incidents in recent years in which Russia has been accused of planting incendiary bombs in packages intended to travel by air.

Image by Aagnverglaser.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A drone carrying an explosive device caused flight suspensions at Leipzig/Halle Airport in Germany, with authorities investigating a possible connection to Ukrainian aircraft.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Left Push to Ban Germany’s Populist AfD.

A left-leaning legal group in Germany is calling for the ban of Alternative for Germany (AfD), the country’s most popular party.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: More than 1,000 German lawyers, judges, prosecutors, legal scholars, and other jurists have signed an open letter urging the federal government and parliament to initiate proceedings before Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court to ban the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.
📰 DETAIL: The campaign argues that a recent legal opinion commissioned by the Society for Civil Liberties, based on millions of publicly available data points and thousands of pieces of evidence, provides sufficient grounds to examine whether the anti-mass migration AfD’s politics make it unconstitutional. Supporters of a ban argue that further delays could endanger Germany’s democratic order by allowing German voters to democratically elect more AfD representatives. The appeal marks a significant increase from the roughly 600 legal professionals who made a similar request in early 2025, with organizers continuing to gather signatures. The AfD, Germany’s largest opposition party, has consistently rejected accusations that it is unconstitutional and argues that efforts to ban it are politically motivated attempts to silence opposition voices. International attention has also focused on the party, with Vice President JD Vance previously urging German leaders to respect the AfD and the millions of voters who support it rather than isolating them politically. The debate over a potential ban comes as the AfD has continued to gain electoral momentum, recently topping several national opinion polls
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It is the duty of lawyers to resolutely fight the AfD,”  said Angela Furmaniak, head of the Republican Lawyers’ Association (RAV), urging politicians to “act before it is too late.”
🎯 IMPACT: Opponents of banning the AfD, including senior figures in the U.S. government, argue this move represents an attempt by the left to use lawfare to suppress the most popular political party in the country because they dislike its anti-mass migration politics, with particular criticism of leftists wanting to ban the party in the name of “democracy.”

Image by Olaf Kosinsky.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A left-leaning legal group in Germany is calling for the ban of Alternative for Germany (AfD), the country's most popular party.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Afghan Posed as Teen to Rape 13-Year-Old Girl.

A 28-year-old asylum seeker is on trial for allegedly posing as a teenager on Snapchat to groom and rape a 13-year-old schoolgirl, with DNA evidence reportedly linking him to the crime.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Abdul Khan, 28, is standing trial at Nottingham Crown Court facing nine charges, including rape, sexual communication with a child, and meeting a child following grooming, all of which he denies. Prosecutors say the asylum seeker posed as a 14-year-old named “Abs” on Snapchat and befriended a 13-year-old Nottingham schoolgirl who told him she was also 14.
📺 DETAIL: After exchanging messages, they met at a tram stop on May 14 last year, with the girl surprised that the Afghan’s appearance did not match the photos she had seen. Khan allegedly took her to Scout Wood Nature Reserve in Clifton and raped her. The teenager later disclosed the assault to her father, and forensic tests found DNA matching Khan on her school trousers. He was later arrested on a separate admitted charge of sexual communication with a child, and phone messages linking him to the victim were recovered. Khan told police he entered Britain in a lorry in 2015 and gave a false 2004 date of birth in his asylum claim. He denied the rape, and is being assisted in court by a Pashto interpreter at taxpayers’ expense.
🎯 IMPACT: The trial is just the latest to involve migrants taking advantage of and raping children in Western countries. While the British Labour government has announced plans to ban children under 16 from using social media under a curfew system, it remains to be seen whether that ban will be effective or easily bypassed.

Image by David Pearson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A 28-year-old asylum seeker is on trial for allegedly posing as a teenager on Snapchat to groom and rape a 13-year-old schoolgirl, with DNA evidence reportedly linking him to the crime.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

EU Pressures Spain to Accept ‘Special Measures’ Amid Migrant Crisis.

The European Union has urged Spain to accept special measures after tens of thousands of illegal migrants overwhelmed its borders, sparking disputes among EU member states.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The European Union (EU) has urged Spain to accept enhanced monitoring measures following the migrant crisis in Ceuta, where roughly 70,000 illegal migrants crossed into the Spanish exclave on the coast of North Africa last week. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has also been asked to provide verified figures on how many migrants have been returned to Morocco.
📺 DETAIL: Spanish officials have offered differing estimates of how many migrants remain in Ceuta, with Government delegate Miguel Ángel Pérez placing the figure at about 2,500 while regional leader Juan Jesús Vivas said it could be as high as 5,000. EU member states have requested independent verification of Spain’s reported return numbers and a review of lessons learned to prevent similar incidents, according to diplomatic sources. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, formerly a German government minister under Angela Merkel, praised Spain’s response and offered additional EU Border Agency support and funding. Sánchez criticized some European partners for what he described as “selfish, polarising and unlawful” reactions to the crisis, likely caused in part by his decision to offer a mass amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegals earlier in the year, accusing them of exploiting the crisis for political purposes.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The images coming from Ceuta are striking and demonstrate, once again, that uncontrolled illegal immigration poses a concrete threat to the security of Europe’s borders.” – Giorgia Meloni, Italian Prime Minister
🎯 IMPACT: The crisis has highlighted deep divisions within the EU over migration policy. Italy and France have pushed for stronger border controls in response to the Ceuta incident and for improved coordination to protect the EU’s common borders.
📺 FLASHBACK: Ceuta, a Spanish exclave on the coast of North Africa, just eight miles from the Spanish mainland, has long been a focal point for illegal migration into the European Union due to its border with Morocco. The city has been Spanish since the 1500s, and is one of two Spanish exclaves on the North African coast, along with Melilla. Illegal migrants also reach Spanish territory by sailing directly for the mainland, and for the Canary Islands off the coast of West Africa.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The European Union has urged Spain to accept special measures after tens of thousands of illegal migrants overwhelmed its borders, sparking disputes among EU member states.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK Govt ‘Deportation’ Deal Has Brought in More Migrants Than It Has Removed.

The so-called “one in, one out” deportation agreement between the United Kingdom and France has led to more migrants being admitted to Britain than being removed.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: More illegal immigrants have arrived in the United Kingdom under the Labour government’s “one in, one out” deal with France than have been removed from the country.
📺 DETAIL: In July last year, under former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, in collaboration with French President Emmanuel Macron, the United Kingdom and France agreed a deal to tackle the rising number of small boats carrying illegal migrants launched from northern France. This deal states that for every migrant the United Kingdom returns to France after an illegal Channel crossing, the United Kingdom agrees to admit one different migrant from France through a legal, approved route. However, it has been revealed that, under this supposedly equitable deal, 1,117 migrants have been admitted to Britain while only 1,087 illegals have been removed. This means that Britain has accepted more arrivals than it has returned. The new data follows new Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s defense of the government’s current approach to the Channel crisis.
🎯 IMPACT: These new figures are likely to cast doubt on the government’s border control strategy. This new data suggests that the British government is not deporting illegal immigrants fast enough or in particularly high numbers. This is potentially down to the fact that illegal Channel crossings have spiked under new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham. This is likely to create pressure on the new Prime Minister, especially in light of the crisis in Ceuta, Spain, in which approximately 70,000 illegal migrants rushed the exclave’s border with Morocco. If the Labour government cannot fulfill the objective of its own deal, voters may look to parties offering more thorough measures, such as Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, which recently unveiled “Operation Fortress” on Monday. This program would use the Royal Navy to deter small boats carrying illegal migrants across the English Channel.
📺 FLASHBACK: This is not the first time that the deal with France has come under scrutiny. Back in October 2025, a boat migrant deported to France under the deal simply returned to Britain on another small boat. “If I had felt that France was safe for me, I would never have returned to the UK,” said the migrant at the time.

Image by Pedro Gontijo/Senado Federal.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The so-called "one in, one out" deportation agreement between the United Kingdom and France has led to more migrants being admitted to Britain than being removed.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK PM Burnham, Spanish PM Sanchez Going on Vacation Amid Twin Migrant Crises.

The British and Spanish prime ministers have decided to go on vacation as their respective countries grapple with ongoing illegal immigration crises, raising concerns that Andy Burnham and Pedro Sánchez are neglecting their duties.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Far-left Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has gone on holiday amid a migrant surge into the Spanish city of Ceuta, and new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has decided to take a break just two weeks into the role despite a growing influx of boat migrants.
📺 DETAIL: Pedro Sánchez traveled to the Canary Islands off the west coast of Africa just days after the crisis at Ceuta, a Spanish enclave bordering Morocco in north Africa. The European Union (EU) has since called an emergency meeting to address the ongoing crisis and EU border security more broadly. Around the same time, new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced that he was going on vacation as well. Having only been in office for 15 days, Burnham has taken a holiday earlier in his tenure than any modern British Prime Minister. Similar to the Spanish Prime Minister, Burnham opted to go on vacation shortly after he finally publicly addressed the illegal migration crisis in the United Kingdom. Burnham invited criticism from the public and Members of Parliament (MPs) after suggesting that the government’s border strategy was working despite a spike in illegal arrivals throughout his first few weeks in office.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Two weeks into the job and Andy Burnham has already had enough. After dropping a number of unfunded commitments and overseeing over 2,000 illegal migrants breaking into our country he’s bunked off for a jolly abroad. This isn’t a prime minister that’s serious about leading.” – Lee Anderson, Chairman of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party
🎯 IMPACT: The decision by both leaders to take breaks amid growing concerns about border security will likely be perceived by the public as an attempt to avoid accountability and to cast doubt on their commitment to addressing illegal immigration.
📺 FLASHBACK: Last week, it was reported that roughly 70,000 migrants had rushed the Spanish border with Morocco. In response, Italy suspended its EU free movement agreement with Spain, and other EU countries called for Spain’s participation in the EU’s free movement area to be suspended. Thousands of migrants continue to remain in Ceuta, overwhelming public services and occupying public spaces. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The British and Spanish prime ministers have decided to go on vacation as their respective countries grapple with ongoing illegal immigration crises, raising concerns that Andy Burnham and Pedro Sánchez are neglecting their duties.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Colombia’s Outgoing Marxist Prez Warns of ‘Civil War’ as Trump-Backed Successor Prepares to Take Office.

Outgoing Colombian President Gustavo Petro claims the country’s defeated leftist presidential candidate actually won the election, warning of potential violence as Trump-backed President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella prepares for inauguration.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Outgoing far-left President of Colombia Gustavo Petro has threatened “civil war” if Trump-backed President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella is allowed to take power.
📺 DETAIL: Abelardo De la Espriella, a conservative lawyer, decisively won the Colombian presidential run-off election against his leftist rival, Iván Cepeda, back in June. In response to Espriella’s victory, Petro, the country’s first leftist president, accused “moneyed Israeli” interests of interfering with Colombian democracy and suggested that Espriella’s victory was a triumph of so-called “narcofascism.” Petro suggested that Cepeda had actually won the election. “We are before a fraud and an institutional problem that is undoubtedly profound, and that is the possession of an illegitimate president because he who won is named Iván Cepeda,” said the outgoing President. “This causes not just the judicial discussion that needs to happen, etc, but a major political problem,” Petro added. He concluded that the “electoral regime in Colombia must change substantially if we don’t want more violence.” Petro previously conceded the left had been defeated in June, but has since reversed his position. Espriella called Petro’s comments an “affront to the sovereign decision of the Colombian people.” The President-elect declared, “So-called ‘civil disobedience’ is a euphemism to try to destabilize democracy.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It is very clear that what can happen is a civil war in Colombia… The policies of sweeping away social reforms of the people will only augment the people’s resistance that can reach unimaginable levels.” – President Gustavo Petro.
🎯 IMPACT: Petro’s comments risk destabilizing the country ahead of Espriella’s inauguration. It also represents a reversal of his initial concession of defeat when Cepeda, a member of his party, lost to Espriella during the run-off election. Petro’s rhetoric accusing Espriella of being a fascist echoes similar attacks on President Donald J. Trump, especially during and after the 2024 Presidential election.
📺 FLASHBACK: Espriella’s victory represents a continuing trend of South American countries shifting rightwards. Back in June, right-wing presidential candidate Keiko Fujimori was narrowly elected as Peru’s first female president. These followed right-wing victories in Argentina, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Chile, Ecuador, and Paraguay.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Outgoing Colombian President Gustavo Petro claims the country's defeated leftist presidential candidate actually won the election, warning of potential violence as Trump-backed President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella prepares for inauguration.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.