Tuesday, October 7, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Kash Patel: Charlie Kirk Assassin Motivated by ‘Hatred for What Charlie Stood For.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel has said Charlie Kirk’s assassin was motivated by “hatred of what Charlie stood for,” and defended the agency’s handling of the investigation.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: FBI Director Kash Patel, Deputy Director Dan Bongino, Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, and alleged assassin Tyler Robinson.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The FBI investigation followed the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University last Wednesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: Patel said the evidence shows Robinson “claimed that he had an opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and he was going to do it, because of his hatred for what Charlie stood for.”

🎯IMPACT: The FBI captured Robinson within 33 hours, but there has been some criticism of the agency’s handling of the case.

IN FULL

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel has revealed that Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin, Tyler Robinson, “claimed that he had an opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and he was going to do it, because of his hatred for what Charlie stood for.” Patel also revealed that “[Robinson’s] family has collectively told investigators that he subscribed to left-wing ideology.”

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino also described the killing as “an ideologically motivated attack.” This follows Utah Governor Spencer Cox (R) disclosing that Robinson had a transgender partner and was immersed in “leftist ideology.”

Patel also defended his agency’s handling of the investigation into the assassination of Kirk, stressing that the suspect was apprehended within 33 hours of the incident. The FBI and Patel had faced criticism after the assassin was able to escape the scene of Kirk’s murder at Utah Valley University, and for an announcement that a “subject” was in custody shortly after the assassination, only for them to be released in short order.

“Could I have worded it a little better in the heat of the moment? Sure, but do I regret putting it out? Absolutely not. I was telling the world what the FBI was doing as we were doing it, and I’m continuing to do that,” Patel said of the “subject” announcement in an interview on Monday.

Patel reportedly pushed for the public release of surveillance video of the assassin on the Utah Valley University campus, which led to Robinson’s father turning him in to law enforcement.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Burger Chain Embraces Patriotism with MASSIVE American Flags at All Locations.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Steak ‘n Shake has started installing large American flags at its locations nationwide, aiming to display the tallest and largest flags permitted by local governments.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Steak ‘n Shake, President Donald J. Trump, former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) frontman Elon Musk, and Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced on October 5, 2025, with installations ongoing across the United States.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Every Steak n Shake is getting the tallest and biggest American flag that local governments will allow! Steak n Shake proudly supports American values and traditions.” – Steak ‘n Shake

🎯IMPACT: The move has ignited widespread support online, with notable figures like Elon Musk praising the effort, while reigniting debates over flag-related legislation.

IN FULL

Fast food chain Steak ‘n Shake has begun installing large American flags at its restaurants across the country, according to a company post on X. They stated, “Every Steak n Shake is getting the tallest and biggest American flag that local governments will allow! Steak n Shake proudly supports American values and traditions.”

The announcement quickly went viral, accumulating 6.4 million views and nearly 200,000 likes. High-profile figures, including billionaire Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, responded positively. “I’m ordering from there tomorrow!” Musk wrote.

Steak ‘n Shake, based in Indiana, operates 397 restaurants across 24 states and territories in the U.S., employing over 10,000 people. Notably, the move follows President Donald J. Trump‘s August 25 Executive Order, which directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute individuals caught burning or desecrating the American flag on related charges such as crimes against property and the peace, or incitement.

Trump emphasized the symbolic importance of the flag, calling it “the most sacred and cherished symbol of the United States of America,” and reiterated his administration’s commitment to prosecuting flag desecration, which he described as “the clearest possible expression of opposition to the political union that preserves our rights, liberty, and security.”

In Congress, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) introduced the Make American Flags in America Act of 2025, aimed at ensuring that all American flags procured by federal agencies are manufactured domestically. Cruz highlighted that loopholes have allowed foreign-made flags to be sold as American-made, urging Congress to pass his legislation to close these gaps.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Grassley Exposes Another FBI Plot Against Trump.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: New documents reveal further evidence of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s “weaponization” against Donald J. Trump and his allies.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Senator Charles “Chuck” Grassley (R-IA), Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI, and Trump aide Peter Navarro.

📍WHEN & WHERE: October 7, 2025; Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is the kind of conduct that shattered the American people’s faith in our government.” – Pam Bondi

🎯IMPACT: Increased scrutiny on the FBI’s actions and potential legal ramifications.

IN FULL

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has released fresh documents pointing to additional “weaponization” of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) against President Donald J. Trump under indicted former Director James Comey. Among them is a message from then-Supervisory Special Agent Tim Thibault dated March 2, 2017, shortly after President Trump’s first inauguration, where he boasts that the Squad CR-15/Federal Public Corruption & Government Fraud team was “Aggressively seeking out open-source information, HUMINT info that could predicate a case” against the America First leader.

The files also shed light on the FBI’s handling of Peter Navarro, a key Trump advisor convicted on contempt of Congress charges. Grassley, 92, took issue with the bureau’s choice to arrest Navarro in full view at an airport rather than discreetly at his residence, “which was literally right next to FBI Headquarters,” deeming it “unnecessary” and appearing to imply a political motive.

During her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Pam Bondi labeled the FBI’s conduct a “historic betrayal of public trust.” She highlighted how 92 Republican figures and organizations faced invasive FBI probes.

Grassley further unveiled a 2017 memo about an FBI investigation into payments linked to former President Bill Clinton. He raised doubts about whether the FBI chased this lead with the intensity it applied to its pursuit of Trump, asking, “Did the FBI throw its resources behind this matter just like it did against Trump and his associates? Or did they sweep it all under the rug?”

“Attorney General Bondi, I expect you to provide me with all records relating to these matters for further verification,” he added.

Image by Paul Morigi Photography.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Jaguar Sales Continue to Plummet, Production to Resume Following Shutdown.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) reported a 17.1 percent drop in vehicle sales for the July-September period, citing a cyber attack and higher U.S. tariffs as major challenges.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: JLR, its suppliers, and JLR’s CEO Adrian Mardell, with broader impacts on the automotive supply chain.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Sales figures cover July to September 2025; manufacturing operations are set to restart this Wednesday at various British and global sites.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It has been a challenging quarter for JLR. We know there is much more to do but our recovery is firmly under way.” – Adrian Mardell

🎯IMPACT: A cyber attack and halted production have disrupted JLR’s global operations and affected its suppliers, prompting new financing measures to stabilize the supply chain.

IN FULL

Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has reported a significant drop in sales, with figures showing a 17.1 percent decline in the July-September quarter compared to the same period last year. United Kingdom sales fell by nearly a third, and global wholesale volumes dropped by 24.2 percent year on year. The British carmaker attributed the downturn to a cyber attack that disrupted production since early September and the impact of higher U.S. tariffs. However, earlier this summer, JLR’s sales saw a catastrophic slump due to both a production shutdown and a woke rebrand, with these issues likely continuing to impact sales.

The National Pulse reported in June that JLR rolled out a rebrand that ditched the iconic “leaper” logo, used a lower-case monogram, and focused on electric vehicles. The rebrand received stiff backlash and mockery, with automobile enthusiasts accusing Jaguar of becoming more of a fashion or luxury brand rather than a car company after its widely-panned inaugural commercial, which featured a series of bizarrely dressed, androgynous models and zero cars.

JLR announced plans to restart production on Wednesday at multiple British sites, including its Wolverhampton engine plant, Coleshill battery assembly center, and stamping operations in Castle Bromwich, Halewood, and Solihull. Key areas of its Solihull vehicle production plant, such as the body shop and paint shop, will also resume operations. Additionally, its Nitra, Slovakia facility and Solihull’s Range Rover production lines are set to follow later in the week.

The company has unveiled a new financing scheme to support struggling suppliers affected by the cyber attack. The initiative aims to fast-track payments, with eligible suppliers receiving cash up to 120 days earlier than usual terms. JLR also committed to reimbursing financing costs for those participating in the scheme during the restart phase.

Adrian Mardell, JLR’s CEO, acknowledged the difficulties faced by the company, stating, “It has been a challenging quarter for JLR. In the first two months our performance was robust and in line with our expectations, against the backdrop of the planned wind down of legacy Jaguar models and the impact of incremental US tariffs. From the start of September, we have been responding to a cyber incident, which shut down our production. This morning we announced the phased restart of JLR’s manufacturing operations following the cyber incident. We know there is much more to do but our recovery is firmly under way.”

The British government recently announced a £1.5 billion loan guarantee to assist JLR in stabilizing its supply chain, which employs around 120,000 people. The company’s supply chain support package will initially prioritize production-critical suppliers before expanding to non-production suppliers also impacted by the disruption.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Police Union Calls on Jay Jones to Exit AG Race for Backing Cop Deaths.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Virginia Fraternal Order of Police (VFOP) has condemned Democrat Attorney General candidate Jay Jones for violent text messages—including fantasies about killing children and police—and called for his withdrawal from the race.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jay Jones, Virginia Fraternal Order of Police, former Virginia House Speaker Todd Gilbert, and Republican Delegate Carrie Coyner.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Text messages sent in 2022; with the messages resurfacing last week.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It is time you hold yourself accountable for these actions and withdraw from the Attorney General race immediately.” – Virginia Fraternal Order of Police

🎯IMPACT: Despite the condemnation, major Democrats have not withdrawn their endorsements of Jones.

IN FULL

The Virginia Fraternal Order of Police (VFOP) has publicly condemned Democrat Attorney General candidate Jay Jones after violent text messages sent by him in 2022 came to light. In the texts, Jones called for the death of former Virginia House Speaker Todd Gilbert, fantasized about killing Gilbert’s children, and wished death on law enforcement. The VFOP has called for Jones to withdraw from the race.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), the VFOP wrote, “The Virginia Fraternal Order of Police is aware of the recent text message scandal involving you, the Democrat candidate for Attorney General. While this incident may have occurred in 2022, this conduct has no place in our society or democracy, especially from an elected official who is running to be the top prosecutor in Virginia. The men and women of the Virginia Fraternal Order unequivocally condemn these violent text messages sent by you about a political opponent and his family.”

The controversy stems from texts sent by Jones to Republican Delegate Carrie Coyner in 2022, where he remarked, “Three people, two bullets. Gilbert, hitler and pol pot. Gilbert gets two bullets to the head.” Coyner reportedly responded, “Jay Please stop.” Jones later called Coyner and allegedly expressed a desire for Gilbert’s children to die to influence policy decisions.

In recounting the incident, Coyner detailed a heated discussion with Jones about qualified immunity for police officers: “I said, ‘I believe that people will get killed. Police officers will get killed.’ And he said, ‘Well, maybe if a few of them died, that they would move on, not shooting people, not killing people.’ And I said, ‘that’s insane.’ But he firmly believed that if you removed qualified immunity, that police officers would act differently, and I firmly believe that it would not result in good public policy, and it would put police officers and the public’s lives at risk if they have to second-guess themselves on a decision they’re making in a moment where someone is doing something violent.”

Despite the VFOP’s condemnation, other major Democratic candidates in the state, including gubernatorial nominee Abigail Spanberger, have continued to support Jones, with no significant withdrawals of endorsements.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

EU Begs Trump for Trade Duty Relief as It Doubles Steel Tariffs.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The European Commission proposed a 50 percent tariff on steel imports exceeding a reduced annual quota to protect its steel industry.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: European Commissioner for Industry Stéphane Séjourné, European Union (EU) trade chief Maroš Šefčovič, and trade association Eurofer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Proposal announced on Tuesday; measures set to take effect after June 2026 if approved.

💬KEY QUOTE: “To save our steelworks & our European jobs: we halve our quota of steel imported from abroad; we double the customs duties (from 25% to 50%),” wrote Stéphane Séjourné.

🎯IMPACT: Aims to protect the EU’s steel industry from global competition, including low-cost exports from China and India, while addressing job losses and production declines.

IN FULL

The European Commission has proposed a 50 percent tariff on steel imports exceeding a reduced annual quota, aiming to bolster the European Union’s (EU) struggling steel industry. The current quota of nearly 40 million tonnes faces a 25 percent duty on imports above the limit, but this would double under the new proposal.

European Commissioner for Industry Stéphane Séjourné announced the measures on X (formerly Twitter), stating, “To save our steelworks & our European jobs: we halve our quota of steel imported from abroad; we double the customs duties (from 25% to 50%). This is the reindustrialisation of Europe.”

The EU steel industry has faced significant challenges, including high energy costs and competition from low-cost exports from nations like China and India. The bloc’s share of global steel production has fallen from 9 percent to 7 percent since 2014, with 100,000 jobs lost in the sector over the past 15 years, according to Eurofer.

EU trade chief Maroš Šefčovič highlighted the decline, stating, “We are the only region in the world where [steel] production is actually decreasing.” The proposal also comes amid concerns over U.S. President Donald J.Trump’s imposition of a 50 percent tariff on U.S. steel imports, which risks redirecting Chinese and Indian steel exports toward Europe.

If approved, the measures would take effect after the bloc’s current steel sector safeguards expire in June 2026. Brussels is also seeking closer cooperation with the Trump White House to counteract overcapacity in Chinese steel exports, which are expected to reach a record 120 million tonnes this year.

Image: CC-BY-4.0: © European Union 2023– Source: EP.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Threatens Insurrection Act to Quell Chaos in Democrat-Run Cities.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump mentioned the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act to restore order in Democrat-run cities, especially if courts or local officials delay his plans.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, anti-ICE rioters in Chicago and Portland, and the National Guard.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The discussion took place on Monday in the Oval Office and during a televised interview.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If I had to enact it, I’d do that. If people were being killed and courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that.” – President Trump

🎯IMPACT: The invocation of the Insurrection Act could circumvent efforts by Democrat lawmakers and federal courts aimed at hampering the protection of federal property and agents targeted by violent far-left rioters.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has indicated he might consider invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807, a law that allows the military to engage in civilian law enforcement under specific conditions. The move comes in response to continued and unprecedented interference by federal courts and local officials aimed at hindering his deployment of the National Guard to protect federal property and immigration enforcement agents.

While speaking to reporters in the Oval Office late Monday, Trump stated, “I’d do it if it was necessary. So far it hasn’t been necessary. But we have an Insurrection Act for a reason.” The America First leader emphasized the need to ensure the safety of cities and prevent loss of life, saying, “If I had to enact it, I’d do that. If people were being killed and courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that. I mean, I want to make sure that people aren’t killed. We have to make sure that our cities are safe.”

Trump’s comments came amid his efforts to address crime in cities run by Democrats, with Portland, Oregon, being a current focal point. A federal judge recently blocked the deployment of federalized National Guard troops in Portland, though the Trump White House is moving to appeal the ruling.

Later on Monday, during a television interview, President Trump doubled down on the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act. “If we don’t have to use it, I wouldn’t use it,” he said, adding, “If you take a look at what’s been going on in Portland, it’s been going on for a long time, and that’s insurrection. I mean, that’s pure insurrection.”

The Insurrection Act was last utilized during the 1992 Los Angeles race riots.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

White House Memo Challenges Back Pay for Furloughed Workers.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A draft White House memo argues that federal workers furloughed during the current shutdown are not automatically entitled to back pay, citing a reinterpretation of the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The White House, federal workers, Senate Democrats, labor attorney Nekeisha Campbell, and Sam Berger from the Center for Policy and Budget Priorities.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Amid the ongoing federal government shutdown, as described in a memo reported by Axios.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Does this law cover all these furloughed employees automatically? The conventional wisdom is: Yes, it does. Our view is: No, it doesn’t.” – Senior White House official

🎯IMPACT: Up to 750,000 federal workers could be affected by this reinterpretation, with critics asserting the move is legally baseless and designed to pressure Senate Democrats.

IN FULL

A draft memo circulated by the Trump White House contends that federal workers furloughed during the current shutdown may not be automatically entitled to back pay. The administration claims that the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019 (GEFTA), amended in January 2019—which seemingly guarantees backpay even without a congressional appropriation—has been “misconstrued” or is “deficient.”

The draft memo challenges the conventional understanding of GEFTA, which has long been interpreted as guaranteeing back pay after shutdowns. According to a senior White House official, “Does this law cover all these furloughed employees automatically? The conventional wisdom is: Yes, it does. Our view is: No, it doesn’t.”

The argument hinges on amended language specifying that workers are compensated “subject to the enactment of appropriations Acts ending the lapse.” The administration interprets this as requiring explicit Congressional approval for back pay.

However, some have denounced this interpretation. Labor attorney Nekeisha Campbell stated, “There is no legal authority to support that interpretation of the statute.” Similarly, Sam Berger of the left-wing Center for Policy and Budget Priorities (CPBP) described the amendment as a recognition of the appropriations process, not a restriction on back pay.

With up to 750,000 federal workers affected, one senior official denied that the interpretation was simply a tactic to pressure Senate Democrats. Nearly a week ago, Democrat lawmakers in the Senate, along with Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), voted down a clean continuing resolution passed by the House of Representatives, kicking off the government shutdown.

Subsequently, Senate Democrats, along with Sen. Paul, have voted down four other attempts to reopen the government.

Image by Ted Eytan.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Twenty Conservative Politicians Defect to Farage’s Reform Party Amid Conservative Conference.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Twenty Conservative (Tory) Party councillors have defected to join Nigel Farage’s Reform Party, coinciding with the Conservative Party’s annual conference in Manchester, England.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Defectors from various municipal governments, Nigel Farage, the Reform Party, and Conservative leader Olukemi “Kemi” Badenoch.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The defections were announced on Tuesday, ahead of the Conservative conference finale in Manchester.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The Conservative Party is dead and can no longer serve as an effective Opposition.” – Nigel Farage

🎯IMPACT: The defections bolster Reform’s presence in local councils, while raising questions about the Conservative Party’s unity and viability ahead of the next general election, which must be held by 2029.

IN FULL

Twenty municipal government councillors have defected from the Conservative (Tory) Party to join Nigel Farage’s Reform Party, as the Conservatives are holding their annual conference in Manchester, England. The defections seriously undermine the Conservatives’ new leader, Nigeria-raised Olukemi “Kemi” Badenoch, ahead of the Conservative Party conference’s final day, where she is scheduled to give the closing speech.

Farage celebrated the move, declaring, “The Conservative Party is dead and can no longer serve as an effective Opposition.” The councillors who switched represent a broad spread of municipal governments, including South Kesteven, Hertsmere, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole, the East Riding of Yorkshire, and others.

In a Radio interview, Badenoch stated that the Conservatives’ success would be judged at the next general election. She said, “This conference is where we are showing the direction of travel: a stronger economy, stronger borders and that we’re the only party tough enough and competent enough to deliver both,” and characterized the defections as merely shedding “baggage.”

Brett Rosehill, one of the defectors, challenged Badenoch’s view, stating, “I don’t think it’s ‘shedding baggage.’ I think there’s a strong, growing movement of people who care about British values and safety.”

Notably, while the Conservatives have long positioned themselves as a party of “strong borders,” legalized mass migration remained near record levels throughout much of their time in office from 2010 to mid-2024, and exploded in their last several years in office during the so-called “Boriswave.” An illegal boat migrant crisis in the English Channel also took hold during their tenure.

Reform has been steadily gaining momentum since the 2024 general election, winning 677 municipal government seats in May’s local elections and taking control of several councils previously held by the Conservatives, as well as seizing Doncaster from the governing Labour Party. The Conservatives have collapsed to just 16 percent in the polls, with conference attendees noting the venue is largely empty.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Hispanic Gang Leader Arrested for Ordering Hit on Border Patrol Chief.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A suspected Latin Kings gang member was charged with allegedly placing a bounty on U.S. Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Juan Espinoza Martinez, a Mexican national, and U.S. Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Martinez was arrested on October 6, 2025, in Burr Ridge, Illinois.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Depraved individuals like Juan Espinoza Martinez—who do not value human life and threaten law enforcement—do NOT belong in this country.” – Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin

🎯IMPACT: Martinez faces federal charges for soliciting the murder of a senior law enforcement official, highlighting ongoing tensions over immigration enforcement.

IN FULL

A Latin Kings gang member, Juan Espinoza Martinez, has been charged with allegedly placing a bounty on U.S. Border Patrol commander-at-large Gregory Bovino, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ). Martinez, a Mexican national, was arrested on October 6, 2025, in Burr Ridge, Illinois, after a confidential source informed law enforcement that a “hit” had been placed on Bovino, who is overseeing the “Midway Blitz” immigration enforcement operation in Chicago, Illinois, where the violent criminal gang is based.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revealed that Martinez used Snapchat to offer a $2,000 bounty for information and a $10,000 reward “if you take him down.” A separate message reportedly referenced the Latin Kings gang. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin condemned Martinez’s actions, stating, “Depraved individuals like Juan Espinoza Martinez—who do not value human life and threaten law enforcement—do NOT belong in this country.”

Martinez has been charged in federal court with soliciting the murder of a senior law enforcement official. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche emphasized the seriousness of the case, stating, “Placing a bounty on the head of a federal officer is an attack on the rule of law and on every American who depends on law enforcement to keep them safe.”

Chicago has become a focal point for immigration enforcement efforts, with protests erupting against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids and federal deportation policies. Bovino, who leads operations in Chicago, has been a visible figure in implementing the Trump administration’s immigration policies, which have faced violent attacks perpetrated by far-left rioters and backed by state and local politicians like Governor J.B. Pritzker (D-IL) and Mayor Brandon Johnson (D).

Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Chicago Special Agent-in-Charge Matthew Scarpino described the arrest as a testament to law enforcement’s commitment to protecting those who uphold justice. “Targeting a senior federal officer is a cowardly and direct assault on the rule of law,” Scarpino said.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to State ‘Conversion Therapy’ Ban.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court is set to hear a challenge to Colorado’s law banning “conversion therapy” for minors, brought by a licensed counselor who claims it violates her free speech rights.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor, supported by the Alliance Defending Freedom, is challenging Colorado’s law. The State of Colorado and its licensing officials are defending the law.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The Supreme Court will hear arguments in October. The case originates from Colorado, where the law has been in effect since 2019.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s not the government’s role to peer into the counseling room and say some goals are permitted. Some goals are forbidden. Some speech is allowed. Some speech is forbidden.” – Jonathan Scruggs, Alliance Defending Freedom

🎯IMPACT: The case could have significant implications for free speech, professional conduct regulations, and state power over healthcare practices.

IN FULL

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments Tuesday in a case challenging Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy” for minors. The case was brought by licensed counselor Kaley Chiles, who claims the law violates her First Amendment rights by preventing her from speaking freely with clients who seek counseling on issues related to gender identity and sexual orientation.

Chiles, who offers faith-based counseling, says she is unable to provide the type of guidance some clients are looking for due to the restrictions in the 2019 law. “When I’m having to turn them away, they don’t get help that is helpful for any of those issues,” she said.

The Colorado law prohibits licensed mental health professionals from attempting to change a minor’s sexual orientation or gender identity through therapy. Violators can face fines up to $5,000 and may risk losing their professional licenses. State officials argue the law is necessary to protect minors from practices they describe as harmful and ineffective. They claim it regulates professional conduct, not speech.

Chiles is backed by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group that often takes on free speech and religious liberty cases. She argues that the law unfairly targets her counseling approach, which can involve helping young clients align their gender identity with their biological sex.

“It’s not the government’s role to peer into the counseling room and say some goals are permitted. Some goals are forbidden. Some speech is allowed. Some speech is forbidden,” said Jonathan Scruggs, senior counsel at the Alliance Defending Freedom.

The case has sparked national interest due to its broader implications. Legal scholars warn that a ruling in Chiles’s favor could reshape how states regulate healthcare and other professional services. Shannon Minter of the National Center for LGBTQ Rights complained, “If the court were to accept Chiles’ argument… it would be a very revolutionary, dramatic change in the current legal landscape.”

Both sides have referenced a 2018 Supreme Court decision that struck down a California law requiring crisis pregnancy centers to provide information about abortion. In that case, the Court emphasized that the government cannot compel speech or silence specific viewpoints in a professional setting.

The Trump administration filed a brief supporting Chiles, with then-Solicitor General D. John Sauer writing, “Colorado is muzzling one side of an ongoing debate in the mental-health community.”

When Colorado passed the law, lawmakers defined conversion therapy as any practice that seeks to change sexual orientation or gender identity. In other states like Michigan, similar laws have drawn criticism from opponents who say they could punish parents or counselors who choose not to affirm a child’s transgender identity.

A decision from the Court is expected by summer 2026.

Image by Silar.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.