Friday, August 7, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Democrat Lawmakers Override Governor’s Veto to Establish Slavery Reparations Commission.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Maryland General Assembly voted to override Governor Wes Moore’s (D) veto of a bill creating a slavery reparations commission.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Maryland General Assembly, Gov. Wes Moore, and state Delegates Matthew Morgan (R) and Terri Hill (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The vote took place on Tuesday in Maryland.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This bill betrays the original intention, the unifying event of the civil rights movement. It’s immoral, and it’s fiscally ruinous to this state,” said Del. Matthew Morgan.

🎯IMPACT: SB 587 establishes a commission to study potential reparations and is set to deliver its final report by November 2027.

IN FULL

State lawmakers in Maryland overrode a veto from Governor Wes Moore (D) to adopt Senate Bill (SB) 587, legislation that establishes a government commission to study reparations for residents whose ancestors had been enslaved. Late Tuesday, the Maryland state Senate voted 31 to 14 to override the veto, while the state House of Delegates voted 93-35 to override. Both chambers surpassed the three-fifths threshold needed to circumvent the governor.

The Maryland Reparations Commission, established by the legislation, is now tasked with studying and making “recommendations relating to appropriate benefits to be made to individuals whose ancestors were enslaved in the State or were impacted by certain inequitable government policies.” A preliminary report to the Maryland General Assembly is required to be submitted by January 1, 2027, and a final report must be submitted to the governor and state legislature by November 1, 2027. The commission will explore potential reparations, including monetary compensation, property tax rebates, childcare support, debt forgiveness, and tuition waivers for higher education.

Gov. Moore had initially moved to veto the bill in May of this year, contending that the state already has engaged in multiple studies on slavery reparations and that the lawmakers pushing the issue would better serve their constituents by focusing on policies that directly address alleged racial disparities. In the veto letter sent to Senate President Bill Ferguson (D), Gov. Moore noted that the Maryland state government had established numerous commissions and panels over the last 25 years examining a myriad of related issues.

The legislation drew uniform opposition from Republican lawmakers. Speaking on the state House floor on Tuesday, Delegate Matthew Morgan (R) warned the bill was a move toward “race-bait handouts.” He stated, “This bill betrays the original intention, the unifying event of the civil rights movement. It’s immoral, and it’s fiscally ruinous to this state, and it sends a message to the generations out there now in Maryland that if you’re concerned about fairness, dignity, opportunity… flee Maryland.”

The Legislative Black Caucus of Maryland celebrated the override vote, declaring it a “landmark action” in a post on social media. Likewise, Del. Terri Hill (D) said the establishment of the commission is a move that she and fellow Democrat lawmakers “still feel is the right one.”

Image by Jimmy Emerson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DOJ Finds Duke Law Kept Discriminating Against White Applicants Despite SCOTUS Ruling.

The Department of Justice has concluded that Duke University School of Law violated federal law by using race-based admissions practices, even after the Supreme Court struck down such policies.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has concluded that Duke University School of Law intentionally discriminated against white and Asian applicants based on race.
📺 DETAIL: The DOJ announced on Thursday that Duke University School of Law had given preferential treatment to black and Hispanic candidates during the admissions process. This violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which barred race-conscious college admissions. The discrimination took place between 2023 and 2025. According to internal documents and admissions data uncovered by the DOJ, Duke showed an intent “to discriminate against all racial groups except black and Hispanic applicants, to accept more black and Hispanic applicants.” The university used various mechanisms, such as “diversity” essay questions and other proxies for race to advance its diversity goals, which were consciously disguised as race-neutral measures according to internal communications. “As a result of these practices, highly qualified white, Asian, and other students were denied admission on the basis of their race,” the DOJ said. The investigation also uncovered disparities in LSAT scores, with admitted black applicants that scored significantly lower than rejected white and Asian applicants. In 2025, the median score of an admitted black applicant was 166, while the median score for both white and Asian applicants was 173. The DOJ’s investigation found that a black applicant was roughly 3.5 times more likely to be admitted than an Asian applicant with similar credentials.
💬 KEY QUOTE:Duke Law School doesn’t get a free pass to discriminate against white and Asian students simply because it thinks it has good intentions… Using ‘diversity’ essay questions to identify preferred races for admission is still illegal discrimination based on race, and this Department is committed to eliminating it everywhere we find it, including in our nation’s law schools.” – Harmeet K. Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General
🎯 IMPACT: The DOJ is seeking a voluntary resolution agreement with Duke to bring its admissions practices into compliance with federal law. The DOJ may pursue enforcement through the courts if the university refuses to comply. This represents another front in President Donald J. Trump’s crackdown on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies.

Image by Billy Wilson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Justice has concluded that Duke University School of Law violated federal law by using race-based admissions practices, even after the Supreme Court struck down such policies.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Mother and Two Transgenders Charged in Murder of Mentally Handicapped Boy.

The mother of a seven-year-old boy and two transgenders face murder charges he was found dead following months of alleged abuse.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A mother and two transgenders have been charged with murder and child endangerment in the death of seven-year-old William Evans in Hamilton County, Ohio, after prosecutors alleged the boy endured months of severe abuse. The defendants, identified as the boy’s mother, Kaitlin Evans, 39, along with Nessa Keaney, 23, and Kirby Rankin, 33, appeared in court Friday, where prosecutors said the child was found bound with duct tape inside a closet. He had suffered extensive injuries, including blunt-force trauma, burns, and evidence of “water torture.”
📺 DETAIL: A detective called the case one of the most disturbing examples of child abuse” he had encountered in over 20 years of law enforcement. Prosecutors alleged the three adults were co-parenting the child, who was described as mentally disabled, and said Rankin admitted involvement in the abuse while implicating Evans and Keaney as active participants. Rankin’s attorneys requested a competency evaluation, citing documented mental health issues, and a judge scheduled a hearing on the evaluation for September 4. Bond was set at $1 million on the murder charge and $100,000 on the child endangerment charge for each defendant, with the case scheduled to be presented to a grand jury on August 17.
🎯 IMPACT: The case has raised questions about the oversight of vulnerable children in the care of transgenders, and is just the latest case of children seriously abused by people claiming to be the opposite sex. Legal proceedings are ongoing, with further details are expected to emerge at trial.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The mother of a seven-year-old boy and two transgenders face murder charges he was found dead following months of alleged abuse.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Migrants Heading for Britain Swarm French Trains to Reach New Coastal Launch Sites.

Migrant crossings to Britain are expected to rise as smugglers adapt their tactics, and favorable weather conditions persist in the English Channel.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Hundreds of migrants have reportedly been seen traveling by trains and buses from Calais and Dunkirk along France’s northern coastline, where people-smuggling gangs have increasingly launched small boats towards Britain from further and further away to avoid heightened enforcement along traditional crossing routes.
📺 DETAIL: Migrants are reportedly able to travel in large groups without ticket checks or intervention from French authorities frequently, and favorable weather conditions could lead to another wave of Channel crossings in the coming days. Smuggling networks have also expanded their operations by using larger inflatable boats capable of carrying more than 150 migrants. The developments come as the British Labour government’s “one-in, one-out” migrant return agreement with France faces scrutiny after reports that nearly 50 migrants returned under the scheme have since re-entered Britain. Home Office figures show that 1,087 migrants were returned across the English Channel between August 4 last year and June 30, representing four percent of the 27,920 people who crossed the Channel illegally during the same period. A larger number were sent to Britain from France, for an overall net increase in migrants.
🎯 IMPACT: The ongoing crossings strain is straining border resources, highlighting the limitations of the Labour government’s current policies. New Prime Minister Andy Burnham insists there has been a decrease in crossings compared to previous years, but he has had to acknowledge the need for more action, as over 2,000 migrants crossed in just two weeks after he took office.
📺 FLASHBACK: The “one-in, one-out” deportation deal was introduced to deter illegal crossings, but appears to have comprehensively failed, as it only covers a small number of migrants, more migrants are being sent across the Channel than are returned, and dozens of returnees have simply come back to Britain on another boat.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Migrant crossings to Britain are expected to rise as smugglers adapt their tactics, and favorable weather conditions persist in the English Channel.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

State Fines Meta Over $560 Million for Impact on Children’s Mental Health.

A New Mexico judge has fined Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, $567 million for damaging children’s mental health with new mandates designed to regulate children’s access to social media.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A New Mexico state judge has ordered Meta to pay a $567 million fine for harm caused to children’s mental health by the company’s social media platforms.
📺 DETAIL: Judge Bryan Biedscheid’s 68-page ruling directed Meta to pay $420 million for treatment services for children, with the rest allocated to prevention and awareness initiatives. “The Court finds that the weight of the evidence presented demonstrates that Meta’s platforms are a cause of and substantial contributing factor to the youth mental health crisis in New Mexico,” wrote Judge Biedscheid. The court ordered Meta to delete the accounts of users under 13 and to disable push notifications for minors between 8 AM and 3 PM during the academic year and between 10 PM and 7 AM on normal days. The ruling requires that like counts remain hidden unless authorized by a parent. This follows a $375 million fine imposed on the company earlier this year for violations of New Mexico’s Unfair Practices Act, which prohibits deceptive business practices. “This case has always been about protecting children, standing up for families, and making sure that one of the world’s largest technology companies cannot profit from practices that endanger young people without consequence,” New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez (D) said in a statement. Meta is the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We remain confident in our record of protecting teens online and will continue to defend ourselves against claims that misrepresent the facts,” said Meta spokesman Andy Stone.
🎯 IMPACT: Meta plans to appeal the decision. Specifically, Meta maintains that it has already implemented measures to protect minors from harmful content. The ruling could set a precedent for holding tech companies accountable for their platforms’ effects on children’s mental health. This represents a wider push by governments across the West, such as the United Kingdom and the European Union, to regulate access to social media, allegedly to protect children.
📺 FLASHBACK: Back in June, Meta filed for a federal court contempt order against Israeli spyware firm NSO Group. Meta alleged that the Israeli spyware firm had violated a permanent injunction by targeting users on WhatsApp.

Image by Anthony Quintano.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A New Mexico judge has fined Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, $567 million for damaging children's mental health with new mandates designed to regulate children's access to social media.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Four Out of Five Cities With the Fastest Income Gains in America Are in Trump Country.

A new study has revealed that among the top five cities for rising median household income, four are in states that voted for President Donald J. Trump.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Four out of the five cities with the fastest rising incomes in America are in states that voted for President Donald J. Trump in 2024.
📺 DETAIL: According to a new study published on Thursday by SmartAsset, a personal finance site, the top five U.S. cities with the fastest rising incomes are in Nevada, California, and Florida. The top fives cities are Enterprise in Nevada, Anaheim in California, Henderson in Nevada, Tampa in Florida, and Port St. Lucie in Florida. Nevada and Florida voted for President Trump in 2024. Enterprise topped the survey. The city experienced an 18.3 percent increase in median household income in 2024. Anaheim experienced a 15.8 percent increase, Henderson experienced a 12.4 percent increase, Tampa experienced a 12.2 percent increase, and Port St. Lucie experienced an 11.8 percent increase. Enterprise, Nevada, saw its median household income increase from $93,905 in 2023 to $111,128 in 2024. The growth of all five cities exceeded the national wage growth average of four to five percent in 2024, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. “In many U.S. cities, median household income has outpaced inflation by a wide margin, offsetting the impact of rising costs… In others, however, residents are falling far enough behind to intensify the squeeze on household budgets,” noted the study, which focused on cities with a population of 250,000 or higher.
🎯 IMPACT: The surge in Nevada’s wages is attributed to the diversification of its economy. The state’s economy has historically relied on gambling. New high-paying jobs span software engineering, supply-chain management, and healthcare. While Anaheim, California, features in the top five, the state’s major cities collectively continue to grapple with significant affordability problems. The state’s affordability crisis has caused a collapse in its fertility rate. Meanwhile, on Monday, it was revealed that U.S. manufacturing had reached a four-year high, largely due to domestic production incentives, such as tariffs and tax reforms.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new study has revealed that among the top five cities for rising median household income, four are in states that voted for President Donald J. Trump.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Wildfire Arson Suspect Confesses to Lighting 26 Fires Since 2025.

Newly released court documents have revealed that 37-year-old Aaron Farinacci has allegedly confessed to starting one of the three major wildfires in the Spokane, Washington, area.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Aaron Forrest Farinacci, who was arrested on suspicion of arson, has reportedly admitted to starting the Old Trails Fire in Spokane, Washington.
📺 DETAIL: Farinacci allegedly planned the blaze weeks in advance. Court documents revealed that Farinacci researched weather conditions, sought out high-risk scenarios, and constructed a delayed ignition device to start the fire. He also confessed to starting 25 other wildfires since summer last year, including the Aubrey White Fire in 2025, which forced evacuations and burned over 1,200 acres. Specifically, Farinacci allegedly said that he had the weather “planned out” to maximize the spread of the fire, which he described as “powerful” and “beautiful.” “He knew it was gonna get bad,” wrote investigators. Farinacci also allegedly planned to “feign innocence” if intercepted by the authorities. Farinacci allegedly kept cigarettes and marijuana on him while carrying out the crime to provide an alibi for having matches and a lighter. He allegedly described arson as “an easy crime to get away from if you have time.” It was further alleged that Farinacci knew Spokane County had a “PDS” (Particularly Dangerous Situation) warning immediately before the fire.
🎯 IMPACT: The Old Trails Fire has destroyed at least 900 buildings and displaced approximately 70,000 people. It is one of three major wildfires in the Spokane area. Farinacci’s confession undermines the narrative advanced by many politicians and media outlets that the Spokane Fire was the result of climate change. The revelation that the fire was man-made has caused some to backtrack, including former Washington Governor Jay Inslee (D), who now claims that climate change contributed to the fire rather than causing it.
📺 FLASHBACK: Farinacci was previously convicted of manslaughter in 2012 after fatally shooting his father in Arizona. He spent nearly a decade in prison.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Newly released court documents have revealed that 37-year-old Aaron Farinacci has allegedly confessed to starting one of the three major wildfires in the Spokane, Washington, area.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Enacts Orders to Halt Birth Tourism, Restrict Birthright Citizenship.

President Trump has issued two executive orders addressing birth tourism and attempting to narrow the scope of birthright citizenship, marking significant changes to U.S. immigration policy.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump signed two executive orders aimed at restricting birthright citizenship and ending birth tourism, despite the Supreme Court’s recent 5-4 ruling in Trump v. Barbara affirming birthright citizenship. Trump said the administration was making “adjustments” to address abuses of the immigration system, arguing that the original intent of the 14th Amendment was to protect the children of former slaves rather than foreigners traveling to the United States to give birth.
📺 DETAIL: According to the White House, one order identifies additional categories of children of noncitizens who are not entitled to birthright citizenship under historical exceptions recognized by the Supreme Court, while the second directs the Departments of State and Homeland Security to halt the practice of birth tourism. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said the administration is using its authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny visas to applicants seeking to enter the country solely to give birth and secure U.S. citizenship for their children. Miller also said the birthright citizenship order expands exclusions to include categories such as enemy aliens, members of foreign terrorist organizations, and certain individuals acting on behalf of foreign governments.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We had a very unfortunate decision in the Supreme Court concerning birthright. It was close, but a very, very unfortunate decision. So we’re making adjustments because it’s very unfair. This was done right after the Civil War… for the babies of slaves, and what’s happening now? People are building businesses around it.” – President Trump
🎯 IMPACT: It is hoped that the orders will reduce the number of foreign nationals exploiting U.S. laws for automatic citizenship and welfare benefits, while addressing national security concerns by limiting citizenship eligibility for individuals tied to foreign adversaries or terrorist organizations.
📺 FLASHBACK: The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Trump v. Barbara earlier this year upheld birthright citizenship under the Constitution, a ruling the Trump administration has sought to address through administrative action.
📈 DATA: Birth tourism reportedly accounts for thousands of births annually in the United States, with some estimates suggesting as many as 33,000 such cases each year.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Trump has issued two executive orders addressing birth tourism and attempting to narrow the scope of birthright citizenship, marking significant changes to U.S. immigration policy.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

One in Five Subsidized Student Loans Are Going to Foreign Nationals.

The rising share of foreign students taking out tuition and maintenance loans in the United Kingdom, many of whom do not repay them, has sparked concerns about waste, fraud, and abuse.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Non-British citizens account for one in five student loans in the United Kingdom, according to new research.
📺 DETAIL: The share of student loans going to non-citizens has risen from 10.2 percent to 19.3 percent. This means that the share of student loans going to non-citizens has roughly doubled over the past decade. Foreigners from the European Union (EU) represent a large portion of these non-citizens, especially Romanians, who account for one in 20. Foreign students were handed approximately £4 billion (~$5.4 billion) in tuition and maintenance loans overall. Foreign students are also 25 percent less likely to repay their loans compared to British students. This results in estimated annual losses for taxpayers ranging from £1.2 billion to £2.2 billion. Student Loans Company data shows that roughly 195,000 of the 239,000 foreign loan recipients hold settled status.
🎯 IMPACT: The growing financial burden on British taxpayers could reach billions annually, as the cost of unpaid loans continues to mount. The Department for Education has since pledged to crack down on abuse and improve enforcement measures for debt collection. This represents another case of immigration serving as a net drain on British taxpayers. If the figures lead to the exposure of widespread abuse, it is likely to damage the reputation of Britain’s higher education system further.
📺 FLASHBACK: This is not the only metric showing a rise in foreigners in Britain’s education system. Last month, it was revealed that White British students have become a minority at 27 universities across the country.

Image by David Iliff.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The rising share of foreign students taking out tuition and maintenance loans in the United Kingdom, many of whom do not repay them, has sparked concerns about waste, fraud, and abuse.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Donations to Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s Labour Party Collapse by 84 Percent.

The governing Labour Party’s latest financial report has revealed that donations fell drastically between in 2025, placing pressure on new Prime Minister and Labour Party leader Andy Burnham.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Funding for the United Kingdom’s governing Labour Party fell by over 80 percent in 2025.
📺 DETAIL: On Thursday, it was revealed that donations to the Labour Party fell by 84 percent in 2025 compared to the year prior. This represents the biggest drop-off among the three main parties. Donations to Olukemi “Kemi” Badenoch’s Conservative Party fell by 46 percent, while donations to the Liberal Democrats, a progressive liberal party that supports re-joining the European Union and open borders, fell by 65 percent. Donations to “Count Binface,” the novelty candidate currently contesting Reform UK leader Nigel Farage in the Clacton by-election, fell by 93 percent. These figures detailing the Labour Party’s financial collapse come just weeks into new Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s tenure. Despite experiencing a momentary “Burnham Bounce” in the polls, the party still trails Nigel Farage’s Reform UK, which experienced a 290 percent increase in funding between 2024 and 2025. Despite extensive media coverage, Zack Polanski’s far-left Green Party only increased donations by eight percent in the same period. The Labour Party secured £6.4m (~$8.6m) in donations. In contrast, Reform secured £22.8m (~$30.6m). The Conservatives received £15.2m (~$20.4m), the Greens received £2.7m (~$3.6m), and the Liberal Democrats received £2.6m (~$3.5m).
🎯 IMPACT: These findings likely reflect the widespread dissatisfaction with the current Labour-controlled British government. Since entering office in July 2024, under the leadership of former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, the party has declined in the polls due to unpopular economic policies, high-profile scandals, and the ongoing illegal immigration crisis. These figures also suggest a movement away from the two major parties: Labour and the Conservatives, the latter of which also experienced a significant drop in donations. By contrast, the figures show growing confidence in Nigel Farage’s Reform UK.

Image by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The governing Labour Party's latest financial report has revealed that donations fell drastically between in 2025, placing pressure on new Prime Minister and Labour Party leader Andy Burnham.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

RINO Governors Move to Counter Mass Deportations With State Work Permits for Migrants.

Two Republican governors are joining Democrats to advocate for state-issued work permits for migrants, undermining President Donald J. Trump’s federal immigration policy.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Two Republican-in-name-only (RINO) governors are working with the Democrats to issue work permits to migrants and bypass federal deportation orders.
📺 DETAIL: Governors Spencer Cox (R-UT) and Kevin Stitt (R-OK) have partnered with Governors Wes Moore (D-MD) and Matt Meyer (D-DE) to propose a plan allowing states to issue work permits to migrants, bypassing federal deportation processes. The proposal was introduced via the National Governors Association’s Task Force on Immigration Policy. “The reason I set this task force up is because I realized by talking to my colleagues that they’re having the same issues… Let’s actually have the governors issue workforce permits,” said Stitt. “We were really stunned that everybody had kind of the same opinions on what needed to be done,” added Cox. The governors’ proposal aims to address labor shortages in their respective states, especially in agriculture and construction.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We were together in February and having a conversation about immigration, and we were all shocked at the level of bipartisanship, cooperation, and agreement,” said Cox.
🎯 IMPACT: This shows how many prominent Republican politicians continue to prioritize cheap foreign labor over American workers. Cox’s comments in particular highlight how immigration liberalization unites the establishments of both parties, despite widespread support for lowering immigration among the American people. It is possible that this move by RINO governors to overtly align with Democrats will heighten tensions within the Republican coalition ahead of the midterms.
📺 FLASHBACK: This is not the first time that Republican governors have sought to undermine President Trump’s agenda. Last month, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine (R) voiced opposition to President Trump’s plan to deport Haitian illegal migrants by stripping them of Temporary Protected Status (TPS), a humanitarian immigration status that allows migrants to legally live and work in the United States. RINOs have also sought to undermine redistricting measures. For instance, the Republican-controlled South Carolina Senate voted against a new congressional map that sought to eliminate the state’s racially gerrymandered black-majority Democrat-voting district in May.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Two Republican governors are joining Democrats to advocate for state-issued work permits for migrants, undermining President Donald J. Trump's federal immigration policy.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.