GET THE APP
Monday, June 29, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

51 minutes ago
News

Scottish World Cup Fan Begging for U.S. Visa Has Decade+ of Anti-Trump Tweets.

A Scottish vlogger’s attempt to stay in the U.S. after the World Cup may be complicated by his history of anti-Trump tweets.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Shaun Alexander, a Scottish vlogger and World Cup fan, is seeking to extend his stay in the U.S. by crowdfunding for an O-1 visa, despite a history of anti-Trump tweets.
📰 DETAIL: Alexander expressed his newfound love for America in a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Sunday, linking a GoFundMe page to cover visa-related expenses. However, past tweets uncovered by The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam reveal a decade of spiteful attacks against President Donald J. Trump, including calling for him to be “buried” in 2015. The following year, Alexander described Trump as “evil” and “a joke,” as well as “sick,” and in 2017, he called the President a “bawbag” (slang for scrotum). As recently as 2025, he was posting that the America First leader is “pathetic.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I’ve seen enough. Not even on the plane home yet and have already decided: I MUST find a way to come back and experience the 4th of July in this very special year…” – Shaun Alexander, June 2026
🎯 IMPACT: O-1A visas are for individuals with extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business, or athletics, while O-1B visas are for individuals with extraordinary ability in the arts or extraordinary achievement in motion picture or television. Alexander, with a relatively modest X following of a little over 60,000 as of the time of publication, and few obvious accolades beyond some viral vlogs of his time in the U.S. during the World Cup, may struggle to obtain one, especially given his long history of smearing the incumbent President. 

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
Immigration
News
Politics

Labour Scraps Ban on Illegal Immigrants Getting Citizenship.

The British government’s decision to reverse a ban on illegal immigrants claiming British citizenship raises concerns over the legal system’s role in indirectly encouraging and facilitating human trafficking.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Britain’s Labour Party government has quietly reversed a ban on asylum seekers applying for British citizenship.
📺 DETAIL: The reversal has been approved by Shabana Mahmood, the Pakistani-heritage Home Secretary, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Homeland Security Secretary. The ban was reversed following a lawfare campaign by two pro-immigration groups, representing five migrants. The groups claimed that the policy violated human rights laws and international treaties. Subsequently, the Home Office conceded and paid their legal costs. The reversal of the ban means that migrants who entered Britain illegally can apply for citizenship. Updated guidelines now include exceptions for individuals who argue their illegal entry was “outside their control.” The guidelines say that it is “normally appropriate to disregard overstaying, illegal entry, or arrival without a required entry clearance or electronic travel authorisation having made a dangerous journey, where it was outside the person’s control.” The new guidelines were produced by then-Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who now serves as Foreign Secretary, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Secretary of State. The reversal of the ban was announced on Sunday.
🎯 IMPACT: The policy reversal highlights Labour’s soft stance on illegal immigration, despite Home Secretary Mahmood’s cultivated reputation as a hardliner on the issue. The story also underscores the role of human rights groups in preventing the deportation of illegal immigrants and watering down immigration reforms. The revelation that the government reversed the ban on illegal immigrants obtaining British citizenship comes days before the Labour government’s Immigration and Asylum Bill is set to be put before Parliament. Andy Burnham, Labour Member of Parliament for Makerfield and the presumptive incoming Prime Minister, is reportedly considering ditching key provisions of the legislation to make it weaker and appease Labour backbenchers as he seeks their nominations for leader, which begin in early July.
📺 FLASHBACK: Illegal immigrants are continuously blocked from deportation in Britain due to human rights laws and asylum claims. Earlier this month, it was reported that roughly half of all illegal immigrants in Britain cannot be deported due to asylum and human rights claims. Specifically, in August 2024, Immigration Enforcement in Britain identified 412,191 migrants with “no status in the UK.” Out of these individuals, 201,926 were deemed “not removable” due to pending legal challenges related to asylum and human rights.

Image by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The British government's decision to reverse a ban on illegal immigrants claiming British citizenship raises concerns over the legal system's role in indirectly encouraging and facilitating human trafficking.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
Immigration
News
UK

One Year’s Intake of Asylum Seekers to Cost $6.7 Billion.

Nigel Farage has raised concerns over the financial burden of asylum seekers granted residency under human rights laws, citing Home Office figures estimating a ~$6.7 billion lifetime cost from just one year’s intake.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage has warned that Britain‘s border crisis is “bankrupting” the country after Home Office data revealed that 34,400 migrants granted residency in Britain last year under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the so-called right to “private and family life” often used to shield migrants with relations in Britain from deportation, is projected to cost British taxpayers the equivalent of about $6.7 billion over their lifetimes.
📺 DETAIL:  The report estimated an average lifetime net fiscal cost of roughly $193,000 per migrant. The projection includes spending on healthcare, education, welfare, and pensions, while accounting for future tax contributions, but excludes the costs associated with dependants, meaning the overall fiscal impact could be higher. Farage said the figures demonstrate the long-term financial burden of current immigration policies and argued that continued small-boat crossings across the English Channel are placing unsustainable pressure on public finances. Home Office analysis also found that more than 77,000 people were granted permission to remain on Article 8 grounds in 2025, representing more than half of all successful family-related immigration applications. Reform UK figures, including Robert Jenrick, said the findings strengthen the case for tougher immigration controls and limiting the role of the ECHR in removal decisions.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Allowing those boats to cross the Channel is bankrupting Britain.” – Nigel Farage
🎯 IMPACT: The $6.7 billion cost is nearly equivalent to the $6.8 billion welfare budget cut proposed last year and highlights the strain on public finances caused by immigration. The findings have intensified calls for reform, with Reform calling for Britain to leave the ECHR and implement stricter deportation rules.
📺 FLASHBACK: The ECHR has long been a contentious issue in UK politics, with Brexit advocates and others arguing that foreign courts and conventions should not dictate domestic immigration policies.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Nigel Farage has raised concerns over the financial burden of asylum seekers granted residency under human rights laws, citing Home Office figures estimating a ~$6.7 billion lifetime cost from just one year's intake.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
Crime
News

DOJ Probes China-Based Marxist Mogul Singham for Fraud, Money Laundering.

The Department of Justice is investigating Neville Roy Singham for alleged financial crimes tied to his funding of left-wing and Marxist organizations in the U.S.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has launched a grand jury investigation into Neville Roy Singham, a China-based tech mogul, over allegations of wire fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, and other financial crimes. Singham is accused of funneling $285 million to left-wing and Marxist groups in the U.S. through a network of shell companies and a Goldman Sachs philanthropic fund.
📺 DETAIL: Prosecutors in the Southern District of New York have reportedly issued subpoenas seeking bank records and other documents related to Singham’s financial network as part of an investigation authorized by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and led by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also reportedly met with Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon, warning the firm it could face scrutiny if it failed to cooperate with investigators. Singham, who lives in China, has publicly expressed support for China’s communist political system and has criticized the United States in public remarks. News of the investigation comes after political commentator Hasan Piker, who has acknowledged Singham helped fund his trip to Cuba, said after receiving a subpoena that he believes federal investigators are primarily focused on Singham and organizations he has supported. No charges have been announced against Singham as of the time of publication, and the investigation remains ongoing
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I think that ultimately the target is probably Singham and his operation, from PSL to Answer Coalition to Code Pink, like, anything that he has ever financed,” said far-left streamer Hasan Piker, who is also under investigation for a Cuba-related trip linked to Singham, in late May.
🎯 IMPACT: The investigation could have far-reaching consequences for left-wing organizations funded by Singham, as well as for Goldman Sachs if it is found complicit in facilitating his financial transactions. The case highlights growing concerns over foreign influence and financial misconduct tied to political advocacy in the U.S.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Department of Justice is investigating Neville Roy Singham for alleged financial crimes tied to his funding of left-wing and Marxist organizations in the U.S.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

4 hours ago
News
War

Trump Announces Iran Talks, Iranian Official Denies They Are Scheduled After Weekend Strikes.

President Donald J. Trump announced upcoming peace talks with Iran, but Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister has denied any such meeting amid escalating tensions and violence.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump claimed on Truth Social that Iran has requested peace talks, set to occur in Doha, Qatar, on June 30. However, while some Iranian sources have told Reuters that technical talks are set for Tuesday, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi has publicly denied the claim, stating, “No technical meetings of the working groups are planned for this week.”
📺 DETAIL: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Special Envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner would lead the U.S. delegation if talks proceed. The conflicting statements came after both countries exchanged military strikes over the weekend, escalating tensions and raising concerns about the future of nuclear negotiations. According to the White House, the latest violence followed Iranian attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz using drones, prompting U.S. strikes on Iranian missile, drone, and radar sites along the Persian Gulf. Leavitt said the United States would respond forcefully to attacks on commercial vessels and reiterated the administration’s commitment to protecting international shipping. Oil prices rose amid the unrest, with Brent crude trading around $72 per barrel and West Texas Intermediate near $70. U.S. negotiators are reportedly seeking an agreement that would require Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions and surrender its stockpile of enriched uranium, while Iran has called for joint control of the Strait of Hormuz and the release of billions of dollars in frozen assets. Iranian state-linked media and outlets affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) have argued that the country should pursue a nuclear deterrent.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Violence will be met with violence… there were attacks on commercial vessels that the United States of America, directed by the President, responded to,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
🎯 IMPACT: The conflicting narratives from the U.S. and Iran cast doubt on the potential for meaningful progress in resolving tensions.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Donald J. Trump announced upcoming peace talks with Iran, but Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister has denied any such meeting amid escalating tensions and violence.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

5 hours ago
Immigration
News
UK

Labour Plans to Let Members of the Public Decide Asylum Appeals and Import Migrants via ‘Sponsorship’ Scheme.

Britain’s Labour Party government has proposed a new public-led tribunal system to expedite asylum appeals, and a scheme for private entities and individuals to sponsor the importation of migrants.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The British government’s Home Secretary has proposed plans to create public panels to oversee asylum decisions, and a “sponsorship” scheme to let private entities and persons pay to import migrants.
📺 DETAIL: British Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Homeland Security Secretary, has announced plans to create the Independent Immigration Appeals Authority (IIAA). The IIAA will include a new public-led tribunal system to oversee asylum appeals. Following a magistrate-style training process, “professionally trained and independently appointed” members of the public, selected from a wide array of backgrounds, will adjudicate appeals against rejected asylum claims. The creation of the IIAA is included in the Immigration and Asylum Bill, and its implementation could potentially begin in late 2027.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The ‘members of the public’ will be just like the BBC Question Time audience, stacked with the usual hand-picked open borders activists and even men who broke in illegally. Who then nod through every claim. Reform UK will NOT recognise any decisions made by these ‘adjudicators’. Nobody who broke into Britain illegally, will be allowed to stay. Even if granted leave to remain by Tories or Labour, they will stripped of that status deported. The British people have had enough.” – Zia Yusuf
🎯 IMPACT: According to a leaked government report last week, the British government cannot deport half of the illegal immigrants known to be in Britain due to asylum and human rights claims. Out of the 412,191 migrants with “no status in the UK,” 201,926 were deemed “not removable” due to pending legal challenges related to asylum claims. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage singled out the decision to implement the migrant sponsorship scheme, which he described as a “Homes for Ukraine-style migrant scheme,” which will reportedly allow migrants from African countries like Sudan and Eritrea to enter Britain. As noted by Farage, the nationalities are significantly overrepresented in violent and sexual crime in Britain, and are the home countries of several high-profile criminals, such as “Deng Majek, the illegal migrant who murdered Rhiannon Whyte” and Mohamed Harun, a refugee who shouted “f**k England” after being sentenced for raping a woman. “Labour have no mandate whatsoever for this. If Burnham wants one, he must call a general election… When it comes to so-called ‘asylum seekers’ from nations very different to our own, we are long past full. A Reform government will reverse this ridiculous scheme. Or, better yet, the whole thing should be cancelled now,” said Farage on X.

Image via Home Office.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Britain's Labour Party government has proposed a new public-led tribunal system to expedite asylum appeals, and a scheme for private entities and individuals to sponsor the importation of migrants.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

5 hours ago
News
Politics
UK

Farage Blasts ‘Open Borders Andy’ Burnham’s 10-Year Plan for Britain.

Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform UK party, has criticized “Open Borders Andy” Burnham, the likely next Prime Minister, following a flagship speech on Monday.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform UK party, criticized presumptive Prime Minister Andy Burnham for his plans to increase devolution, arguing it won’t solve key national issues. Burnham outlined his ten-year plan for Britain in a speech on Monday, ahead of his expected rise to replace the outgoing Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “What the country wants is immediate action. And I tell you what, they’re not going to get it from Mr. Burnham or, should I say, Open Borders Andy.” – Nigel Farage
📰 DETAIL: Farage questioned the effectiveness of devolution, that is, devolving more decision-making powers from the central government to regional bodies. Specifically, Farage questioned whether devolution to London, Wales, and Scotland had helped in addressing concerns such as safety, healthcare, and political corruption. “Has devolution in London, with Mayor Sadiq Khan, made London’s streets safer? No. Has devolution in Wales given a better [National Health Service] or education? No… Has devolution in Scotland cleaned up Scottish politics… no,” argued Farage on Monday, ciiting the recent imprisonment of former  Chief Executive of the Scottish National Party Peter Murrell for embezzling funds. Farage further criticized Burnham’s plan as lacking urgency and failing to address Britain’s current challenges, such as illegal immigration and the national debt. “He [Burnham] says it will take ten years to lift Britain back up to where it needs to be… Those of us that believe that Britain is broken would say we haven’t got ten years, the country will be totally unrecognizable in ten years,” said Farage.
🎯 IMPACT: This represents another line of attack in Reform’s critique of Burnham. Reform Shadow Home Secretary Zia Yusuf has already criticized Burnham’s immigration plans. Specifically, Yusuf warned that Burnham intends to relocate over 10,000 asylum seekers from African countries like Sudan and Eritrea, whose nationals are disproportionately convicted of severe crimes such as violent and sexual assault, to Britain. “Labour has no mandate for this. It was not in their manifesto. The British people voted repeatedly for less immigration, yet keep being subjected to more,” said Yusuf on Sunday.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform UK party, has criticized "Open Borders Andy" Burnham, the likely next Prime Minister, following a flagship speech on Monday.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

6 hours ago
News
SCOTUS

Supreme Court ALLOWS Counting of Mail-In Ballots Arriving After Election Day.

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of so-called grace periods for mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received up to five days later. The 5-4 decision, authored by Amy Coney Barrett, is a loss for the Republican Party, which had challenged the law, arguing it violates the Constitution.
📺 DETAIL: Mississippi is one of 18 states and territories with grace periods for mail-in ballots, most of which are Democrat-led. Republicans, led by President Donald J. Trump and the Republican National Committee (RNC), oppose such laws, arguing they undermine election integrity by extending the election timeline beyond what Congress sets. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals previously ruled in favor of the Republicans, leading to this Supreme Court case.
🎯 IMPACT: The ruling solidifies mail-in ballot grace periods ahead of the 2026 midterms elections. President Trump and his allies maintain that such rules facilitate electoral fraud. Following the ruling, President Trump wrote on Truth Social that it is now more important than ever for Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, which includes election integrity rules related to voter ID and voter registration.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “[T]he election-day statutes require the electorate’s choice to be made on election day. That occurs so long as election day is the deadline for individuals to vote—as it is in Mississippi.” – Amy Coney Barrett
💬 SECONDARY QUOTE: “Two centuries of historical practice reinforce the proposition that holding an ‘election’ on a particular day means that poll workers had to receive the ballots by that date. From this country’s founding until the late 20th century, election-day ballot collection was the near-uniform practice, with only a few, late-arriving exceptions.” – Justice Samuel Alito, dissenting
📺 FLASHBACK: Trump previously signed an executive order requiring all federal election ballots to be received by Election Day, but it was swiftly blocked by lower courts.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of so-called grace periods for mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

6 hours ago
Crime
News
UK

Official Police Watchdog Investigating Officer Bias in Henry Nowak’s Arrest.

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is investigating whether Hampshire Police’s wrongful arrest of white murder victim Henry Nowak was influenced by nearby anti-immigration protests.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The official police watchdog in the United Kingdom has announced an investigation into whether officers involved in the wrongful arrest of white murder victim Henry Nowak, 18, were influenced by nearby anti-immigration protests.
📺 DETAIL: The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) has expanded its investigation into Hampshire Police after Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old white student stabbed to death by 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa with a Sikh religious dagger, was wrongfully handcuffed in December last year by officers who refused to believe he had been stabbed, after Digwa and his relatives falsely accused him of racism. The IOPC announced its expanded investigation this week following six months of prior investigation into Nowak’s arrest. The investigation will assess whether officers were influenced by anti-immigration protests occurring near the crime scene. Specifically, Nowak’s wrongful arrest and murder occurred a short distance away from Highfield House Hotel. Locals and anti-immigration activists have been demonstrating outside the hotel, which is hosting migrants at taxpayers’ expense, since May 2025. There have been clashes between activists and migrants, resulting in five arrests and five dispersal orders since the protests began. One of the orders was issued just days before Nowak’s arrest. The IOPC will also look into the use of handcuffs on Nowak—Digwa, notably, was never handcuffed, even after his belated arrest for attempted murder—and the provision of first aid to Nowak, but has decided not to pursue misconduct charges against the individual officers involved in the teenager’s wrongful arrest.
🎯 IMPACT: The investigation raises questions about police conduct and impartiality in the context of immigration, with officers seemingly willing to believe an unsubstantiated allegation of racism against a white person with little investigation, and treating it more seriously than an allegation of stabbing against an ethnic minority. The outcome of the investigation is likely to influence the push by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage to end two-tier policing and institutional anti-white racism in the United Kingdom. Officers may have failed to assist Nowak and believed the Digwa family’s false claim that Nowak had racially abused them to avoid accusations of racism from migrant and ethnic minority groups.
📺 FLASHBACK: This represents another branch of the investigation into Henry Nowak’s murder and wrongful arrest. Last week, new bodycam footage revealed that the police treated Nowak and Digwa very differently. Specifically, the footage revealed that Digwa was not handcuffed when he was arrested for attempted murder, with the sympathetic officer agreeing, “I know,” as Digwa falsely claimed that he had been “racistly [sic] attacked.” In contrast, police refused to believe Nowak had been stabbed when he told them he needed an ambulance. Nowak seemingly passed out and died almost immediately after being pinned down and handcuffed by officers, after having remained conscious for over an hour before they intervened.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We have been updating our terms of reference following recent discussions with Henry’s family. Once all concerned parties are notified we will be in a position to provide further information.” – IOPC spokesman

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is investigating whether Hampshire Police's wrongful arrest of white murder victim Henry Nowak was influenced by nearby anti-immigration protests.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

7 hours ago
News
SCOTUS

Supreme Court Restores Presidential Power to Fire Federal Officials, Overturning 90-Year Deep State Shield.

The Supreme Court has empowered the President to remove independent agency heads, reshaping federal bureaucracy.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that President Donald J. Trump can fire Federal Trade Commission (FTC) members and, by implication, other federal officials, at will, overturning the Humphrey’s Executor v. United States decision of 1935, which had protected independent agencies for 90 years. Notably, another Monday morning Supreme Court ruling places limits on the President’s power to fire Federal Reserve governors.
📰 DETAIL: The FTC case, Trump v. Slaughter, arose after Trump fired two Democrat FTC commissioners, Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, without cause, as their service no longer aligned with the Trump administration’s priorities. The Court’s decision emphasizes the President’s constitutional authority to remove executive officers.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The Constitution vests executive power in one president who must be able to remove the officers who wield that power on his behalf.” – Chief Justice John Roberts
💬 SECONDARY QUOTE: “BIG WIN just moments ago at the Supreme Court, in the Slaughter Case, confirming Presidential Power in our Country to remove Executive Branch Officers and Agency Appointees, or Representatives, under Article II. This Decision was long sought by United States Presidents, dating all the way back to the 1930s. It is such an Honor to be the sitting President who won this Historic and Unprecedented Ruling, one of the most important ever given with respect to Presidential Powers.” – President Trump, reacting to the ruling on Truth Social
🎯 IMPACT: This ruling reshapes the federal bureaucracy by allowing the President greater control over independent agencies, potentially preventing “unfireable” officials from undermining the agenda of elected officials.
👀 FLASHBACK: The decision contrasts with another ruling on the same day, Trump v. Cook, where the Court ruled the President could not remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors at will, highlighting a distinction between the central bank and other independent agencies.

Image by Billy Wilson.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses. 

show less

The Supreme Court has empowered the President to remove independent agency heads, reshaping federal bureaucracy.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

8 hours ago
News
SCOTUS

Supreme Court Declines Trump’s Appeal in E. Jean Carroll Lawsuit.

The Supreme Court has left intact a civil jury verdict holding President Donald J. Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court declined to hear President Donald J. Trump’s appeal of a civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll. The Monday morning decision upholds a $5 million judgment awarded to Carroll following a civil trial in 2023.
📺 DETAIL: The case centers on Carroll’s claim that Trump sexually abused her in a New York City department store in the mid-1990s, a claim he has consistently denied. Trump did not attend the trial, and his legal team called no witnesses. He argued in his appeal that the allegations were implausible, that the alleged incident had occurred around three decades ago in changing rooms that are usually locked and staffed, and that the trial judge erred in allowing certain evidence, such as the unsubstantiated allegations of two other women. Bizarrely, jurors found Trump not liable for rape, which was the main accusation against him, despite finding him liable for sexual abuse.
🎯 IMPACT: The Supreme Court’s decision may mark the end of Trump’s legal avenues to overturn the $5m judgment. Carroll has also won a separate defamation case against Trump, with an $83 million judgment, which he is also appealing.
📺 FLASHBACK: Carroll first made her allegations public in 2019, prompting Trump to deny the claims and accuse her of fabricating the story. She claims to have been attacked by a large number of men and boys over the years in separate incidents, including a childhood playmate, a babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed former boss, and former CBS chief executive Les Moonves.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Supreme Court has left intact a civil jury verdict holding President Donald J. Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad