The Trump administration has activated a long-dormant court to pursue the deportation of an Afghan woman accused of supporting Islamic State and radicalizing her family, marking the first-ever Alien Terrorist Removal Court case since it was created in 1996.
| PULSE POINTS |
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has activated the Alien Terrorist Removal Court for the first time. 📺 DETAIL: The court has been activated as part of an effort to deport Nazira Haji Zada, an Afghan woman accused of supporting ISIS. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has alleged that Haji Zada supported Islamic State (ISIS), pledged allegiance to it, and indoctrinated her son and son-in-law into ISIS ideology. Her son and son-in-law have since been convicted of plotting a terrorist attack on Election Day 2024. According to federal law, the government is allowed to deport non-citizens who have engaged in or supported terrorist activities. Haji Zada has been a lawful permanent resident in the U.S. since 2018, although she does not have citizenship. The court was created under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, but has never heard a case. Importantly, the court can consider classified evidence while shielding sensitive intelligence in working towards its decision. “The allegations in this case show the matriarch of an ISIS-sympathizing family aiding in a plot to launch a mass casualty attack on American voters on Election Day,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. 💬 KEY QUOTE: “Congress created the Alien Terrorist Removal Court three decades ago to remove from the United States alien terrorists who never should have been here in the first place.” – Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. 🎯 IMPACT: This is the first time that the court has been activated, having been dormant since its creation in 1996. The outcome of the case could determine whether the court becomes a regular device in deportation operations, particularly when dealing with foreign-born extremists who are permanent residents. The activation of the court means that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts must form a panel to assess Haji Zada’s case. Against the backdrop of author Salman Rushdie’s would-be assassin being found guilty of attempting to carry out a fatwa and supporting Hezbollah in federal court, this move represents a broader pivot towards tackling Islamic terrorism on U.S. soil. |
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.