Tuesday, July 21, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Trial Day 14: Michael Cohen, The MeidasTouchers, And a 14-Year-Old!?

The 14th day of former President Donald J. Trump‘s Manhattan-based trial was exclusively dedicated to the defense’s cross-examination of the disbarred serial perjurer Michael Cohen. On Wednesday, Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney, Robert Costello, testified before Congress that his old client had repeatedly claimed to him that he had no evidence against Donald Trump. With most of his Tuesday testimony now in question, Trump’s lead counsel, Todd Blanche, zeroed in on more of Cohen’s lies and hammered the prosecution’s star witness over the shifting details of the disgraced lawyer’s testimony.

COHEN GETS MEIDAS TOUCHED.

The morning started with a muddled exchange about when Cohen found out about Bragg’s indictment against former President Trump. Judge Juan Merchan later sidelined much of the questioning and testimony surrounding this as attorneys on both sides struggled to clarify the timeline of events.

Next, however, Blanche entered into the evidence record a recording of the serial perjurer’s Mea Culpa podcast hosted by the far-left website MeidasTouch. Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger objected to the move but was overruled by Judge Merchan.

Cohen can be heard on the podcast recording congratulating Bragg on the Trump indictment. Additionally, Cohen states that he spent countless hours with Bragg. “You never met Alvin Bragg, right?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“Correct,” responded the disgraced lawyer. Again, Blanche, with tightly controlled questioning, elicits another instance where Cohen lied—in this case, to his audience regarding his interactions with the Manhattan District Attorney.

MOTIVATED BY REVENGE. 

The next stage of the Trump defense team’s cross-examination of Michael Cohen focused on the serial perjurer’s possible motivations for testifying against his former boss. Blanche hammered Cohen on the latter’s public statements, celebrating the chance Trump could be sent to prison.

“I truly f**king hope that this man ends up in prison,” Cohen could be heard on a podcast recording played for the jury. The disgraced attorney went on to say: “But revenge is a dish best served cold, and you better believe I want this man to go down and rot inside for what he did to my family.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he had ever said his work with prosecutors had helped get the former President indicted. “I took some credit, yes,” he replied. Trump‘s lead counsel repeated his question. “Yes, that’s what I believe,” responded Cohen.

COHEN CAN’T HELP HIMSELF.

“You continued to call President Trump various names on your podcasts and when you’re even doing CNN interviews, correct?” Blanche asked next, and Cohen admitted he did. Cohen was then presented with his April 21, 2024, TikTok post just before the trial began. In the video, Cohen states he has “mental excitement about the fact that this trial was starting.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he knew a paralegal was monitoring his social media. “That didn’t stop you, did it?” Blanche pressed Cohen. “No, sir,” he replied.

Trump’s defense team hit Cohen hard on both Tuesday and Thursday for his lack of self-control and inability to follow instructions. Blanche’s strategy appears to be to illustrate to jurors that Cohen is motivated only by his own self-perception and selfish desires. Beyond his simply profiting from the trial, Blanche is underscoring that Cohen often acts on his own with disregard for how his actions affect others.

LIES, LIES, AND MORE LIES.

Again taking aim at Cohen’s credibility, Blanche walked the disbarred attorney through multiple past instances where he was proven to have lied before courts, lawyers, and Congress. “Was that oath that you took every single time, so going back to all the depositions, the same oath that you took Monday morning in this courtroom?” Blanche asked, with Cohen responding: “Yes, sir.”

“And each time you met with a federal agent you were told that if you made a false statement that that was a felony, a federal crime, correct?” Blanche continued. Again, Cohen responded: “Yes, sir.”

Blanche next focused on Cohen’s lies before the House Intelligence Committee in 2017. “There were a couple of different lies?” he asked Cohen, the latter responding: “That’s correct.”

Cohen admitted to Blanche that he had lied under oath to the Congressional committee and lied again when he met with the special counsel in April 2018.

WHOSE FAULT IS IT?

Trump’s lead defense counsel pressed further, again trapping Cohen into admitting that he lied because of what he perceived he should do. “You said you were accepting responsibility for those lies, for lying to Congress. But in fact, you repeatedly said — and even said this morning, and even this week — that the reason why you lied was because of your loyalty to President Trump,” Blanche asked.

“I worked with a joint defense agreement, and we crafted the two-page document in order to stay on message — the message we all knew Mr. Trump wanted, including Mr. Trump’s attorney at the time,” Cohen replied. Blanche followed up, asking the disgraced attorney: “So are you saying you’re accepting responsibility or blaming the joint defense agreement?”

Cohen begrudgingly admitted on the stand, “I accepted responsibility, I read it, and I submitted it to the committee.”

UNTRUE VERSUS A LIE.

Blanche grilled Cohen about whether federal prosecutors threatened him or tried to induce him to plead guilty to a series of 2018 tax evasion charges. “Nobody induced you or threatened you to plead guilty, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“As I stated previously, I was provided 48 hours within which to accept the plea, or the Southern District of New York was going to file an 80-page indictment that included my wife. And I elected to protect my family,” the disgraced lawyer responded. Blanche pressed Cohen again about his characterization of interactions with federal prosecutors.

Cohen responded the second time, “I never denied the underlying facts; I just did not believe that I should have been criminally charged for either of those six offenses.”

Blanche pushed back, asking Cohen if there was a difference between him saying something untrue and stating a lie. “I was using just different terminology,” Cohen replied.

“So it was a lie?” Blanche asked. Cohen responded: “Correct.”

WHAT ABOUT BOB?

Much of Blanche’s cross-examination of Cohen seems to be setting up Robert Costello as — possibly — the singular defense witness. Costello is Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney who has, in recent days, told both Congress and several media outlets that his former client is lying on the stand.

The questioning regarding Cohen’s interactions with federal prosecutors is especially pertinent as Costello testified before Congress directly on conversations he had with his client about the federal tax charges. On Wednesday, The National Pulse reported that Costello said: “I explained that if Cohen had truthful information that would implicate Donald Trump, I could get him out of his legal troubles by the end of the week.” He added: “I emphasized that any information Cohen could give would have to be truthful, otherwise it was useless.”

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,’” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

LYING TO A FEDERAL JUDGE.

Trump’s lead defense counsel next addressed Cohen and the fact that the disbarred lawyer had lied to a federal judge. “You testified under oath at a different trial that you did not commit the crimes that you pled guilty to before Judge Pauley, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen, referring to the latter’s perjury before the late U.S. District Court Judge William H. Pauley III.

“Correct,” answered Cohen.

Blanche, citing Cohen’s own words, asked the serial perjurer if it was true that he lied to Judge Pauley because “the stakes affected you personally?” Cohen confirmed to Blanche this was true. Pushing further, Blanche pressed Cohen as to why—during his 2019 testimony before Congress—the disgraced lawyer didn’t tell lawmakers he had lied to the federal judge.

“By not telling Congress or the Senate that you had lied under oath, do you believe that you were omitting important information?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen, and Judge Merchan again overruled the prosecution‘s objection.

“I don’t believe I was asked the question,” Cohen said.

BLAME GAME. 

As the morning’s cross-examination began its final stretch, Blanche focused on Cohen‘s refusal to take responsibility for his actions. “You blame a lot of people over the years for the conduct that you were convicted of,” Blanche told Cohen. The disgraced lawyer responded: “I blame people, yes.”

Blanche proceeded to rattle off a list of people and institutions that Cohen has pointed the finger at for his crimes over the years. These included Cohen’s accountant, bank, federal prosecutors, federal judges, and Donald Trump. Cohen admitted he had blamed each one.

Observers in the courtroom described Cohen as appearing angry and annoyed as Blanche pressed him on every person he’s blamed and his prior convictions for tax evasion and perjury.

A JILTED LAWYER.

Blanche shifted gears again, focusing on the 2016 presidential transition and Cohen’s disappointment at being left behind in New York City. Blanche asked Cohen if it was true that he wanted to serve as the White House chief of staff. “I would have liked to have been considered for ego purpose,” Cohen responded.

After former President Trump tapped Reince Priebus to serve as his chief of staff, Cohen admitted to Blanche that he was disappointed. Blanche then presented Cohen with texts between the latter and his daughter. In the text, Cohen told his daughter that he was with Trump at that very moment and that “he wants me to go, just not sure the position,” insinuating that he’d be joining the President in Washington, D.C.

This line of question is important because, as others have testified, Cohen was not seriously considered for any role in the White House or approached about a role. Blanche likely intended this inquiry to reinforce Cohen’s penchant for lying, even to his own daughter. Additionally, the moment further proved that Cohen has an almost delusional opinion of himself and his actions.

“Did you express disappointment to Pastor Scott repeatedly that President Trump hadn’t brought you into the administration?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen. The prosecution’s witness responded annoyedly: “Not into the administration — I knew the role I wanted… I may have expressed frustration.”

When Blanche pressed Cohen as to why he needed someone to put in a good word for a role in the White House when Cohen claimed he talked to Trump almost every day, the disgraced lawyer said, “It’s always good to have somebody else advocate.”

PRANKED BY A TEENAGER.

Just before the lunch break, Trump‘s defense team took aim at one of the prosecution and Cohen’s key claims. Blanche presented Cohen with a series of text and call logs that Cohen had claimed were him reaching out to Trump regarding the resolution of the Stormy Daniels hush money payment. Trump’s lead counsel contended that rather than reaching out to Trump, Cohen was actually calling Trump’s bodyguard, Keith Schiller, for help dealing with a series of harassing phone calls he was receiving from a 14-year-old prankster. The texts between Cohen and Schiller appear to indicate that the latter was indeed the case.

However, Cohen insisted to Blanche that the prankster wasn’t all that he discussed on the calls, stating: “I know that Keith was with Mr. Trump at the time and there was more potentially than this.” A skeptical Blanche, noting the short amount of time over which the texts and calls took place, asked Cohen if he really “had enough time to update Schiller about all the [harassment] problems you were having and also update President Trump about the status of the Stormy Daniels situation because you had to keep him informed?”

“I always ran everything by the boss immediately, and in this case, it would have been saying, ‘Everything has been taken care of — it’s been resolved,'” Cohen responded.

LAWYER OR PR GUY?

The post-lunch cross-examination continued with Blanche pressing Cohen on whether he frequently worked to drive positive stories for Donald Trump. Cohen testified that he would often work place positive stories and that Trump would “blow up” if he failed. At this point, former President Trump visibly shook his head “no” as Cohen spoke.

“It was my routine to always advise Mr. Trump because the story that I was going to put out is not the way he would want it. One, it would cause him to blow up at me, and two, it would probably be the end of my job,” Cohen told Blanche. Again, it appears Blanche’s strategy was to portray Cohen as someone who viewed their role as something more ‘connected‘ than it was.

A CAMPAIGN SURROGATE?

In the next series of questions, Cohen was pressed on whether he ever had a role in the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. Former Trump campaign aide Hope Hicks testified earlier in the trial that Cohen was not a part of the campaign but would often try and interfere with the campaign staff.

Cohen testified that while he wasn’t a campaign staff member, he was a “surrogate.” The serial perjurer, however, has not produced any documentation or evidence of this role being in any official capacity.

“Your testimony is the frustration toward you that didn’t come from President Trump; it came from the campaign staffers?” Blanche asked Cohen. He replied, “Correct.”

COHEN FALLS APART.

As the fourteenth day of trial testimony neared its end, Cohen inadvertently may have crushed District Attorney Alvin Bragg‘s case. Prosecutors have maintained that the hush money payments were campaign expenditures and not legal fees, as Trump’s only concern was about the Stormy Daniels story’s impact on the 2016 election.

However, when discussing the 2011 blog post marking the first public allegations regarding an affair with Stormy Daniels, Cohen admitted Trump was worried about the impact the story would have on his family. “Fair to say that the first time you heard about that and the story by Ms. Daniels, when you talked to President Trump about it, he said he was worried about what his family would think, correct?” Blanche asked.

“Yes, as well as, of course, for the brand,” Cohen admitted. Blanched continued to press Cohen, addressing his 2021 conversation with law enforcement: “The first thing that President Trump said to you was that his family wouldn’t like that very much?”

“That’s true,” Cohen replied.

After Blanche rehashed additional details of conversations Cohen allegedly had with Trump and other associates, the court adjourned at 4PM with Cohen’s cross-examination set to continue on Monday.

You can read The National Pulse’s Day Thirteen trial coverage here, and if you find our work worthwhile, consider joining as a supporter.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Mexican Cartel Leader ‘El Mayo’ Zambada Gets Life Sentence in U.S.

Drug lord Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, a key figure in the Sinaloa Cartel, has been sentenced to life in prison by a United States federal court amid the Trump administration’s ongoing crackdown on international drug trafficking.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, co-founder of the Sinaloa Cartel, a major Mexican drug cartel, has been sentenced to life in prison in the United States.
📺 DETAIL: On Monday, in Brooklyn federal court, United States District Judge Brian Cogan sentenced Zambada to life imprisonment after he pleaded guilty to charges spanning racketeering conspiracy, drug trafficking, and decades of cartel leadership. Zambada pleaded guilty last year as part of a deal to avoid the death penalty. The 76-year-old co-founded the Sinaloa Cartel, a violent drug cartel in Mexico. He was arrested in 2024 alongside Joaquin Guzman Lopez, the son of Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, another prominent Sinaloa Cartel leader who was given a life sentence in 2019. “The almost unimaginable amount of drugs attributable to him and the number of murders that we can document is enough to justify Congress’s decision to make this a ‌mandatory life sentence,” said Judge Cogan during the drug lord’s sentencing. Cogan suggested placing Zambada in a medical facility due to him suffering multiple severe health problems, although prosecutors have expressed security concerns. “To the ‌extent there’s doubt about what’s needed medically, give him the doubt,” Cogan added.
💬 KEY QUOTE:No one wins in a war like ​this. To the next generation, I say, choose ‌a different path,” said Zambada following his sentencing.
🎯 IMPACT: Zambada’s sentencing underscores the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to dismantle international drug cartels, especially those smuggling drugs into the U.S. across the southern border. Zambada’s sentencing is one of several high-profile prosecution cases as part of the Trump administration’s crackdown on Mexican drug cartels. Back in April, Department of Justice prosecutors unsealed an indictment against Rubén Rocha Moya, state governor of Sinaloa, one of Mexico’s federal states and the home of the Sinaloa Cartel. The charges include bribery, kidnapping, and cooperating with the cartel. Zambada’s imprisonment represents a major blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, which is designated as a terrorist organization in the U.S., and a major victory for the Trump administration.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Drug lord Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a key figure in the Sinaloa Cartel, has been sentenced to life in prison by a United States federal court amid the Trump administration's ongoing crackdown on international drug trafficking.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Imposes 50% Tariffs on Canadian Products, Ranging From Honey to Hockey Sticks.

President Trump has announced a 50 percent tariff on Canadian imports in response to discriminatory bans on U.S. exports.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has announced a 50 percent tariff on a wide range of Canadian imports.
📺 DETAIL: On Monday, President Trump announced tariffs on various Canadian imports in response to discriminatory trade practices targeting U.S. exports, mainly alcoholic beverages, but also cement, dairy products, electronics, hockey sticks, honey, vehicles, and other products. The tariffs will come into effect on August 19, 2026. Since last year, Canadian provinces, including Ontario and Quebec, have halted the purchase, distribution, and retailing of U.S. alcoholic beverages, resulting in an 81 percent drop in U.S. alcoholic beverage exports to Canada. The worth of U.S. alcoholic beverage exports to Canada shrank from $718 million to $137 million, while the country continues to import from other places, such as the European Union (EU) and South America. The Trump administration says that the tariffs will be imposed via Section 338 of the 1930 Trade Act. According to the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the section “empowers the President to, among other things, impose duties of up to 50 percent on imports of a foreign country to offset the burden or disadvantage from a foreign country’s unequal imposition on or discrimination against the commerce of the United States.” Only two out of Canada’s 10 provinces did not boycott U.S. alcoholic beverage exports: Alberta and Saskatchewan, neighboring provinces in Canada’s western prairie. The provinces border Montana and North Dakota.
🎯 IMPACT: The new tariffs aim to protect U.S. producers and jobs, as well as encourage Canadian provinces to reverse their discriminatory policies. These tariffs add to the pre-existing tariffs on Canadian exports, such as steel, aluminum, copper, and softwood lumber. As such, this represents an escalation as part of the broader trade dispute between the U.S. and Canada. This follows a threat from President Trump to impose additional tariffs on Canada for neglecting its forests and allowing wildfire smoke to impact U.S. cities. “We are holding Canada responsible for the fact that they are not properly maintaining their forests and brush,” announced the President on Truth Social last week.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Trump has announced a 50 percent tariff on Canadian imports in response to discriminatory bans on U.S. exports.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Suspected Anti-ICE Bomb Thrower Was Armed With Machete, Axes, Knives: Feds.

A suspected anti-ICE terrorist has been taken into custody after allegedly carrying out an attack on a federal facility in Lower Manhattan, New York City.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Andrew Arrabaca, a U.S. Army veteran, has been named as the suspect who allegedly attacked a federal building in Manhattan, New York City, with an improvised incendiary device.
📺 DETAIL: On Monday morning, a man started a fire by throwing a “makeshift incendiary device” made from fireworks and flammable liquid outside 26 Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan, New York City. No deaths were reported, although several people reportedly sustained minor injuries. The 43-year-old Arrabaca was taken into custody as a suspect later that day. Authorities claimed that he was armed with two axes, three knives, a hammer, a machete, and six incendiary devices, as well as a lighter and a liquid suspected to be gasoline, two pellet guns, and had a manifesto. In a press conference following the attack, Assistant Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) James Barnacle claimed that Arrabaca waslooking to injure people and harm people and described the incident as an “anti-government attack,” citing materials found on Arrabaca, including a sign that read “ICE Off Our Streets.” “An FPS Protective Security Officer swiftly tackled and detained the agitator, sustaining minor injuries during the incident. Officers quickly recovered the suspect’s bag, which contained what appeared to be two pellet guns and a manifesto,” said the Department of Homeland Security in a public statement following the attack.
🎯 IMPACT: The suspect is currently in custody, and an investigation is ongoing. The investigation is being conducted by the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force. The building houses agencies including ICE and the FBI. As such, this potentially represents another anti-ICE attack comparable to other incidents, such as the sniper ambush at the Prairieland Detention Center in Texas, a federal immigration facility.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A suspected anti-ICE terrorist has been taken into custody after allegedly carrying out an attack on a federal facility in Lower Manhattan, New York City.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Vows Iran Will Pay ‘Many Times Over’ as Slain U.S. Soldiers Named.

The deaths of multiple U.S. Army soldiers in an Iranian strike on a Jordanian base mark a significant escalation in hostilities following the collapse of a ceasefire agreement with Iran.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The War Department has identified two U.S. Army soldiers killed in last week’s Iranian attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan as 1st Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25, of Ewa Beach, Hawaii, and Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19, of Carrollton, Texas, marking the first American military deaths since hostilities resumed following Iran‘s violations of President Donald J. Trump‘s peace agreement.
📺 DETAIL: Officials said a third service member’s remains are still being identified, while another soldier was killed Saturday during a controlled detonation of unexploded ordnance in northern Iraq, according to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). The latest casualties bring the total number of U.S. service members killed since the conflict began to 17, with more than 420 wounded. Feehan and Gonzales were deployed to Jordan in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, the U.S.-led mission against the Islamic State, and both served in air defense artillery units based at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and Ansbach, Germany, respectively. The Army announced Feehan will be posthumously promoted to captain and awarded the Bronze Star, Purple Heart, and Combat Action Badge. Military leaders praised both soldiers for their service and sacrifice, while War Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote on X, “Godspeed, heroes. Their sacrifice only stiffens our resolve.” President Trump vowed a forceful response, writing on Truth Social that “Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over,” and said the directive had been passed to senior military leaders. Speaking Sunday night, Trump said recent U.S. strikes against Iranian military and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targets were carried out in honor of the fallen service members, as the United States continues an expanded military campaign following the collapse of the ceasefire agreement with Tehran.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over!” – President Donald J. Trump, via Truth Social.
📺 FLASHBACK: The ceasefire agreement brokered by Trump aimed to de-escalate tensions and ensure freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. Its collapse following Iranian attacks on commercial shipping has led to a sharp increase in military actions from both sides.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The deaths of multiple U.S. Army soldiers in an Iranian strike on a Jordanian base mark a significant escalation in hostilities following the collapse of a ceasefire agreement with Iran.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Nearly 100 U.S. Troops Have Been Wounded in Iranian Attacks This Month.

U.S. officials report nearly 100 service members injured in Iranian airstrikes on Middle East bases, with most returning to duty.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nearly 100 U.S. service members have been injured in multiple Iranian missile and drone attacks on American bases across the Middle East since July 7, according to U.S. officials, with Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell confirming that 96 percent of those affected have already returned to duty. Parnell said most of the injuries were minor concussions and praised the troops’ determination to quickly resume their missions
📺 DETAIL: The latest casualty figures come as fighting between the United States and Iran continues to intensify across the region, raising concerns about the potential for a broader conflict. Iran has also directed its Houthi allies in Yemen to block Red Sea shipping if the United States targets additional Iranian power plants, threatening another major disruption to global trade and energy supplies. Escalating hostilities have already pushed the national average price of gasoline back above $4 per gallon after a brief decline during the now-collapsed ceasefire, increasing pressure on American consumers. Public support for ending the conflict remains strong, with recent polling showing a majority of Americans favor bringing the Iran war to a close rather than continuing prolonged military operations
💬 KEY QUOTE:They are determined to get back in the fight. The vast majority of injuries experienced were minor concussions.” – Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell.
🎯 IMPACT: Three U.S. service members were killed last week in an Iranian attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan. Two have been named as 1st Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25, of Ewa Beach, Hawaii, and Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19, of Carrollton, Texas, with a third still to be identified as of the time of publication.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

U.S. officials report nearly 100 service members injured in Iranian airstrikes on Middle East bases, with most returning to duty.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK Deputy Prime Minister Who Branded Trump a ‘Neo-Nazi Sympathizing Sociopath’ Fired.

David Lammy, the stridently anti-Trump Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom under former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, has been sacked by new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Anti-Trump David Lammy has been sacked as Deputy Prime Minister by new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
📺 DETAIL: On Monday, newly-appointed Prime Minister Andy Burnham removed David Lammy as Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor, and Secretary of State for Justice amid a Cabinet reshuffle. Lammy was appointed Deputy Prime Minister under Sir Keir Starmer, the former Prime Minister. Lammy is one of the most vocally anti-Trump politicians in Britain. The former Deputy Prime Minister described President Donald J. Trump as a “racist KKK and Nazi sympathizer” and the MAGA movement as a “cult of white supremacists.” As Justice Secretary, Lammy was central in pushing to end jury trials for most crimes and releasing dangerous criminals early, including killers and rapists. Lammy also stoked controversy by replacing portraits of the late monarch of the United Kingdom, Queen Elizabeth II, with pan-African flags in the British Foreign Office while serving as Foreign Secretary, roughly equivalent to the U.S. State Department and Secretary of State, respectively.
💬 KEY QUOTE:  “I would have been proud to continue serving in Cabinet. But a new prime minister is entitled to build his own team, and I wish Andy Burnham and the new Cabinet every success,” posted Lammy on X (formerly Twitter).
🎯 IMPACT: Lammy is just one of many Starmer appointees to be removed from the Cabinet under Burnham. Lammy’s removal adds to a trend of Prime Minister Burnham removing ministers seen as being close to Starmer. Despite his verbal attacks on President Trump, it is unlikely that Lammy’s removal signals that the British government under Labour is becoming meaningfully less hostile to the President overall. 
📺 FLASHBACK: Also on Monday, Lord Richard Hermer was sacked as Attorney General in the same Cabinet reshuffle. Lord Hermer was a close ally of former Prime Minister Starmer and one of the central architects of the deal to surrender the Chagos Islands, a British Overseas Territory in the Indian Ocean, to Mauritius, a pro-China country in East Africa.

Image via House of Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

David Lammy, the stridently anti-Trump Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom under former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, has been sacked by new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

New UK PM Proposes Rent Freeze to Tackle Cost of Living Crisis.

New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has outlined potential measures to address cost-of-living pressures, including rent controls.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Newly-appointed British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has announced that his government is considering introducing rent controls.
📺 DETAIL: On Monday, Prime Minister Burnham confirmed that his government is considering a number of policies, including rent controls and caps on bus fares and energy bills. While the Prime Minister emphasized that no final decision had been made, the government is expected to announce a package of reforms on Tuesday. “We’re looking at measures that could make a difference this year. So we are looking at all of those things, but we’ll make more announcements tomorrow,” Burnham told reporters. The Prime Minister conceded that the policies would not solve the cost of living crisis, but maintained that they could help people struggling to pay bills. “It won’t solve everything. It won’t take all of the pressure off, but it just shows a direction of travel and that we’re serious about helping them out,” the new Prime Minister added.
💬 KEY QUOTE:We’re just finalising the details, so it’s premature to say it will be any one of those particular things. We just want to do some things that people will feel and feel quite quickly.” – Prime Minister Burnham
🎯 IMPACT: The proposed measures signify the British government’s shift to the left, especially on economic policy. Rent controls have been regularly criticized by economists for reducing housing supply by discouraging construction, misallocating housing, and reducing investment in owned properties, leading to a collapse in quality housing. The fact that Burnham’s policies are explicitly not being pitched as lasting solutions to the cost of living raises questions about the government’s long-term economic plan, especially since the new Prime Minister announced a “10-year plan for the country” upon taking office.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has outlined potential measures to address cost-of-living pressures, including rent controls.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Suspect Charged With Murder of Ann Widdecombe.

Joshua Kerry, a 28-year-old man from Rotherham, northern England, has been charged with the murder of Ann Widdecombe, immigration and justice spokeswoman for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party and a former Conservative lawmaker and government minister.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Joshua Kerry, the man suspected of killing Reform UK immigration and justice spokeswoman and former Conservative Member of Parliament  (MP) and government minister Ann Widdecombe, was charged with murder on Monday.
📺 DETAIL: The 28-year-old Kerry was arrested on July 11, 2026, after Miss Widdecombe, 78, was found dead at her home on July 9, 2026. Kerry was arrested in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, in northern England, over 200 miles from Widdecombe’s home in Devon, south-west England. Laurence Taylor, head of National Counter Terrorism Policing, previously described Widdecombe’s killing as a “targeted attack.” Kerry had been living alone in a council house (public housing) in Rotherham after the death of his father last year. According to family members, Kerry became reclusive after the death of his father. Significantly, Kerry kept newspaper clippings about Reform UK leader Nigel Farage at his home. Farage described Kerry as a far-leftist in The Sun newspaper. “I have it on good authority that the murder suspect was a hard-Left activist. He attended various marches and hated anyone with an opposing view. He had expressed his hatred of me on more than one occasion. He was an intolerant individual obsessed with Soviet communism. He may also have been known to the authorities,” wrote Farage on Saturday. Counter Terrorism Policing took over the investigation into Widdecombe’s killing just days after Kerry was arrested, after local police previously claimed they had no evidence to suggest a political terror motive. “Police enquiries into the defendant’s motives are ongoing, including a potential political or terrorist connection,” said Frank Ferguson, Chief Crown Prosecutor of the Crown Prosecution Service’s Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Division.
🎯 IMPACT: The investigation into Widdecombe’s death is ongoing, with Kerry currently being questioned by Counter Terrorism Police. Kerry will appear in court on July 21, 2026.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Joshua Kerry, a 28-year-old man from Rotherham, northern England, has been charged with the murder of Ann Widdecombe, immigration and justice spokeswoman for Nigel Farage's Reform UK party and a former Conservative lawmaker and government minister.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

English Village Organizing Vote to Declare Independence Over Massive Migrant Camp.

Residents of Piddington in Oxfordshire, England, are set to hold a referendum on seceding from the United Kingdom in response to government plans to transplant over 1,200 asylum seekers to a nearby camp.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The village of Piddington in Oxfordshire, England, plans to hold a referendum on declaring independence from the United Kingdom, protesting the Home Office’s decision to house over 1,200 asylum seekers at a nearby former army barracks.
📰 DETAIL: The Home Office, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, intends to convert the nearby Bicester Garrison into a camp for asylum seekers, part of a broader strategy to cease using hotels for this purpose. The village’s decision to hold a referendum, which coincides with the 250th anniversary of American independence, serves as an objection to the scheme, which will completely transform the demographics of the area virtually overnight.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It’s about representation. We have had no input into the proposal. We have been asking questions, and nothing has come back. The shock of the information triggered people… George Washington brought change about. I am going to make the change and then give away the power like he did.” – Tim McNally, Chairman of Piddington Parish Council
🎯 IMPACT: The referendum highlights local opposition to the Labour Party government’s asylum policy, with tens of thousands of migrants being moved out of hotels and into large-scale camps and houses across the country, mitigating the hotel issue but creating new ones. Piddington residents fear the impact of the mass migrant camp on public safety, public services, and property values.
👀 FLASHBACK: Similar concerns have been raised at other proposed asylum camps, such as those at the Royal Air Force (RAF) base near Linton-on-Ouse and RAF Barnham, reflecting widespread public opposition to having migrants transplanted into rural communities at scale.

Image by Chris Brown.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Residents of Piddington in Oxfordshire, England, are set to hold a referendum on seceding from the United Kingdom in response to government plans to transplant over 1,200 asylum seekers to a nearby camp.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK AG Behind Plot to Surrender Strategic Islands Fired by New PM.

Lord Richard Hermer is one of several high-ranking government officials ousted as part of newly installed British Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s Cabinet reshuffle.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Lord Richard Hermer, architect of the British government’s Chagos Islands surrender deal, has been sacked as Attorney General by the new Prime Minister, Andy Burnham.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It has been the privilege of my life to serve my country as attorney general over the last two years. I’ve been so lucky to be a part of [former Prime Minister Staremer’s] team, as he delivered for the public at home while rebuilding the UK’s reputation abroad, in particular on the rule of law.” – Lord Hermer on Bluesky, having left X (formerly Twitter) after accusing the platform of racism
📰 DETAIL: On Monday, Andy Burnham, leader of the governing Labour Party and Member of Parliament (MP) for Makerfield, officially became Prime Minister. Following his first speech as Prime Minister, Burnham set about reshuffling his Cabinet. Among others, Lord Hermer was removed from the Cabinet. He had served as Attorney General, the highest law officer in the United Kingdom, under former Prime Minister and personal friend Sir Keir Starmer, who announced his resignation in late June. Lord Hermer was a central figure in creating and pushing the Chagos Islands deal, which involves handing over the Chagos Islands, a British Overseas Territory in the Indian Ocean, to Mauritius, an ally of China with no real claim to the archipelago. The treaty ceding control of the Islands to Mauritius was signed by the British government last year, although the legislation required to finalize the deal was shelved following widespread backlash, including from President Donald J. Trump. Under the deal, Britain is expected to pay Mauritius over a 99-year period for a lease of Diego Garcia, one of the Islands, which it currently owns outright for free, and which hosts a strategic British-American military base.
🎯 IMPACT: Lord Hermer’s departure suggests a possible change of direction at the Ministry of Justice. Roughly six months ago, President Trump described the deal as “an act of great stupidity.” Last month, the President even offered to buy the Chagos Islands to prevent them from being ceded to Mauritius. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage was reportedly pivotal in influencing the President’s opposition to the deal. Its terms are widely considered bizarre, with Britain paying a foreign state to take away territory it is under no obligation to surrender.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Lord Richard Hermer is one of several high-ranking government officials ousted as part of newly installed British Prime Minister Andy Burnham's Cabinet reshuffle.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.