Friday, December 5, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Trial Day 14: Michael Cohen, The MeidasTouchers, And a 14-Year-Old!?

The 14th day of former President Donald J. Trump‘s Manhattan-based trial was exclusively dedicated to the defense’s cross-examination of the disbarred serial perjurer Michael Cohen. On Wednesday, Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney, Robert Costello, testified before Congress that his old client had repeatedly claimed to him that he had no evidence against Donald Trump. With most of his Tuesday testimony now in question, Trump’s lead counsel, Todd Blanche, zeroed in on more of Cohen’s lies and hammered the prosecution’s star witness over the shifting details of the disgraced lawyer’s testimony.

COHEN GETS MEIDAS TOUCHED.

The morning started with a muddled exchange about when Cohen found out about Bragg’s indictment against former President Trump. Judge Juan Merchan later sidelined much of the questioning and testimony surrounding this as attorneys on both sides struggled to clarify the timeline of events.

Next, however, Blanche entered into the evidence record a recording of the serial perjurer’s Mea Culpa podcast hosted by the far-left website MeidasTouch. Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger objected to the move but was overruled by Judge Merchan.

Cohen can be heard on the podcast recording congratulating Bragg on the Trump indictment. Additionally, Cohen states that he spent countless hours with Bragg. “You never met Alvin Bragg, right?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“Correct,” responded the disgraced lawyer. Again, Blanche, with tightly controlled questioning, elicits another instance where Cohen lied—in this case, to his audience regarding his interactions with the Manhattan District Attorney.

MOTIVATED BY REVENGE. 

The next stage of the Trump defense team’s cross-examination of Michael Cohen focused on the serial perjurer’s possible motivations for testifying against his former boss. Blanche hammered Cohen on the latter’s public statements, celebrating the chance Trump could be sent to prison.

“I truly f**king hope that this man ends up in prison,” Cohen could be heard on a podcast recording played for the jury. The disgraced attorney went on to say: “But revenge is a dish best served cold, and you better believe I want this man to go down and rot inside for what he did to my family.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he had ever said his work with prosecutors had helped get the former President indicted. “I took some credit, yes,” he replied. Trump‘s lead counsel repeated his question. “Yes, that’s what I believe,” responded Cohen.

COHEN CAN’T HELP HIMSELF.

“You continued to call President Trump various names on your podcasts and when you’re even doing CNN interviews, correct?” Blanche asked next, and Cohen admitted he did. Cohen was then presented with his April 21, 2024, TikTok post just before the trial began. In the video, Cohen states he has “mental excitement about the fact that this trial was starting.”

Blanche asked Cohen if he knew a paralegal was monitoring his social media. “That didn’t stop you, did it?” Blanche pressed Cohen. “No, sir,” he replied.

Trump’s defense team hit Cohen hard on both Tuesday and Thursday for his lack of self-control and inability to follow instructions. Blanche’s strategy appears to be to illustrate to jurors that Cohen is motivated only by his own self-perception and selfish desires. Beyond his simply profiting from the trial, Blanche is underscoring that Cohen often acts on his own with disregard for how his actions affect others.

LIES, LIES, AND MORE LIES.

Again taking aim at Cohen’s credibility, Blanche walked the disbarred attorney through multiple past instances where he was proven to have lied before courts, lawyers, and Congress. “Was that oath that you took every single time, so going back to all the depositions, the same oath that you took Monday morning in this courtroom?” Blanche asked, with Cohen responding: “Yes, sir.”

“And each time you met with a federal agent you were told that if you made a false statement that that was a felony, a federal crime, correct?” Blanche continued. Again, Cohen responded: “Yes, sir.”

Blanche next focused on Cohen’s lies before the House Intelligence Committee in 2017. “There were a couple of different lies?” he asked Cohen, the latter responding: “That’s correct.”

Cohen admitted to Blanche that he had lied under oath to the Congressional committee and lied again when he met with the special counsel in April 2018.

WHOSE FAULT IS IT?

Trump’s lead defense counsel pressed further, again trapping Cohen into admitting that he lied because of what he perceived he should do. “You said you were accepting responsibility for those lies, for lying to Congress. But in fact, you repeatedly said — and even said this morning, and even this week — that the reason why you lied was because of your loyalty to President Trump,” Blanche asked.

“I worked with a joint defense agreement, and we crafted the two-page document in order to stay on message — the message we all knew Mr. Trump wanted, including Mr. Trump’s attorney at the time,” Cohen replied. Blanche followed up, asking the disgraced attorney: “So are you saying you’re accepting responsibility or blaming the joint defense agreement?”

Cohen begrudgingly admitted on the stand, “I accepted responsibility, I read it, and I submitted it to the committee.”

UNTRUE VERSUS A LIE.

Blanche grilled Cohen about whether federal prosecutors threatened him or tried to induce him to plead guilty to a series of 2018 tax evasion charges. “Nobody induced you or threatened you to plead guilty, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen.

“As I stated previously, I was provided 48 hours within which to accept the plea, or the Southern District of New York was going to file an 80-page indictment that included my wife. And I elected to protect my family,” the disgraced lawyer responded. Blanche pressed Cohen again about his characterization of interactions with federal prosecutors.

Cohen responded the second time, “I never denied the underlying facts; I just did not believe that I should have been criminally charged for either of those six offenses.”

Blanche pushed back, asking Cohen if there was a difference between him saying something untrue and stating a lie. “I was using just different terminology,” Cohen replied.

“So it was a lie?” Blanche asked. Cohen responded: “Correct.”

WHAT ABOUT BOB?

Much of Blanche’s cross-examination of Cohen seems to be setting up Robert Costello as — possibly — the singular defense witness. Costello is Cohen’s former criminal defense attorney who has, in recent days, told both Congress and several media outlets that his former client is lying on the stand.

The questioning regarding Cohen’s interactions with federal prosecutors is especially pertinent as Costello testified before Congress directly on conversations he had with his client about the federal tax charges. On Wednesday, The National Pulse reported that Costello said: “I explained that if Cohen had truthful information that would implicate Donald Trump, I could get him out of his legal troubles by the end of the week.” He added: “I emphasized that any information Cohen could give would have to be truthful, otherwise it was useless.”

“Each time Cohen said to me: ‘I swear to God, Bob, I don’t have anything on Donald Trump,’” Costello recalled. He continued: “Cohen must have said this at least ten times because I kept coming back to it from different approaches.”

LYING TO A FEDERAL JUDGE.

Trump’s lead defense counsel next addressed Cohen and the fact that the disbarred lawyer had lied to a federal judge. “You testified under oath at a different trial that you did not commit the crimes that you pled guilty to before Judge Pauley, correct?” Blanche asked Cohen, referring to the latter’s perjury before the late U.S. District Court Judge William H. Pauley III.

“Correct,” answered Cohen.

Blanche, citing Cohen’s own words, asked the serial perjurer if it was true that he lied to Judge Pauley because “the stakes affected you personally?” Cohen confirmed to Blanche this was true. Pushing further, Blanche pressed Cohen as to why—during his 2019 testimony before Congress—the disgraced lawyer didn’t tell lawmakers he had lied to the federal judge.

“By not telling Congress or the Senate that you had lied under oath, do you believe that you were omitting important information?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen, and Judge Merchan again overruled the prosecution‘s objection.

“I don’t believe I was asked the question,” Cohen said.

BLAME GAME. 

As the morning’s cross-examination began its final stretch, Blanche focused on Cohen‘s refusal to take responsibility for his actions. “You blame a lot of people over the years for the conduct that you were convicted of,” Blanche told Cohen. The disgraced lawyer responded: “I blame people, yes.”

Blanche proceeded to rattle off a list of people and institutions that Cohen has pointed the finger at for his crimes over the years. These included Cohen’s accountant, bank, federal prosecutors, federal judges, and Donald Trump. Cohen admitted he had blamed each one.

Observers in the courtroom described Cohen as appearing angry and annoyed as Blanche pressed him on every person he’s blamed and his prior convictions for tax evasion and perjury.

A JILTED LAWYER.

Blanche shifted gears again, focusing on the 2016 presidential transition and Cohen’s disappointment at being left behind in New York City. Blanche asked Cohen if it was true that he wanted to serve as the White House chief of staff. “I would have liked to have been considered for ego purpose,” Cohen responded.

After former President Trump tapped Reince Priebus to serve as his chief of staff, Cohen admitted to Blanche that he was disappointed. Blanche then presented Cohen with texts between the latter and his daughter. In the text, Cohen told his daughter that he was with Trump at that very moment and that “he wants me to go, just not sure the position,” insinuating that he’d be joining the President in Washington, D.C.

This line of question is important because, as others have testified, Cohen was not seriously considered for any role in the White House or approached about a role. Blanche likely intended this inquiry to reinforce Cohen’s penchant for lying, even to his own daughter. Additionally, the moment further proved that Cohen has an almost delusional opinion of himself and his actions.

“Did you express disappointment to Pastor Scott repeatedly that President Trump hadn’t brought you into the administration?” Trump’s lead counsel asked Cohen. The prosecution’s witness responded annoyedly: “Not into the administration — I knew the role I wanted… I may have expressed frustration.”

When Blanche pressed Cohen as to why he needed someone to put in a good word for a role in the White House when Cohen claimed he talked to Trump almost every day, the disgraced lawyer said, “It’s always good to have somebody else advocate.”

PRANKED BY A TEENAGER.

Just before the lunch break, Trump‘s defense team took aim at one of the prosecution and Cohen’s key claims. Blanche presented Cohen with a series of text and call logs that Cohen had claimed were him reaching out to Trump regarding the resolution of the Stormy Daniels hush money payment. Trump’s lead counsel contended that rather than reaching out to Trump, Cohen was actually calling Trump’s bodyguard, Keith Schiller, for help dealing with a series of harassing phone calls he was receiving from a 14-year-old prankster. The texts between Cohen and Schiller appear to indicate that the latter was indeed the case.

However, Cohen insisted to Blanche that the prankster wasn’t all that he discussed on the calls, stating: “I know that Keith was with Mr. Trump at the time and there was more potentially than this.” A skeptical Blanche, noting the short amount of time over which the texts and calls took place, asked Cohen if he really “had enough time to update Schiller about all the [harassment] problems you were having and also update President Trump about the status of the Stormy Daniels situation because you had to keep him informed?”

“I always ran everything by the boss immediately, and in this case, it would have been saying, ‘Everything has been taken care of — it’s been resolved,'” Cohen responded.

LAWYER OR PR GUY?

The post-lunch cross-examination continued with Blanche pressing Cohen on whether he frequently worked to drive positive stories for Donald Trump. Cohen testified that he would often work place positive stories and that Trump would “blow up” if he failed. At this point, former President Trump visibly shook his head “no” as Cohen spoke.

“It was my routine to always advise Mr. Trump because the story that I was going to put out is not the way he would want it. One, it would cause him to blow up at me, and two, it would probably be the end of my job,” Cohen told Blanche. Again, it appears Blanche’s strategy was to portray Cohen as someone who viewed their role as something more ‘connected‘ than it was.

A CAMPAIGN SURROGATE?

In the next series of questions, Cohen was pressed on whether he ever had a role in the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. Former Trump campaign aide Hope Hicks testified earlier in the trial that Cohen was not a part of the campaign but would often try and interfere with the campaign staff.

Cohen testified that while he wasn’t a campaign staff member, he was a “surrogate.” The serial perjurer, however, has not produced any documentation or evidence of this role being in any official capacity.

“Your testimony is the frustration toward you that didn’t come from President Trump; it came from the campaign staffers?” Blanche asked Cohen. He replied, “Correct.”

COHEN FALLS APART.

As the fourteenth day of trial testimony neared its end, Cohen inadvertently may have crushed District Attorney Alvin Bragg‘s case. Prosecutors have maintained that the hush money payments were campaign expenditures and not legal fees, as Trump’s only concern was about the Stormy Daniels story’s impact on the 2016 election.

However, when discussing the 2011 blog post marking the first public allegations regarding an affair with Stormy Daniels, Cohen admitted Trump was worried about the impact the story would have on his family. “Fair to say that the first time you heard about that and the story by Ms. Daniels, when you talked to President Trump about it, he said he was worried about what his family would think, correct?” Blanche asked.

“Yes, as well as, of course, for the brand,” Cohen admitted. Blanched continued to press Cohen, addressing his 2021 conversation with law enforcement: “The first thing that President Trump said to you was that his family wouldn’t like that very much?”

“That’s true,” Cohen replied.

After Blanche rehashed additional details of conversations Cohen allegedly had with Trump and other associates, the court adjourned at 4PM with Cohen’s cross-examination set to continue on Monday.

You can read The National Pulse’s Day Thirteen trial coverage here, and if you find our work worthwhile, consider joining as a supporter.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Ireland Joins Boycott of Eurovision Over Israel’s Participation.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Slovenia announced they will boycott the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest due to Israel’s participation.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Broadcasters from Ireland (RTE), Spain (RTVE), the Netherlands (Avrotros), and Slovenia (RTV), and Israeli President Isaac Herzog.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The boycott affects the Eurovision Song Contest in 2026, with decisions announced in late 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Participation remains unconscionable given the appalling loss of lives in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there which continues to put the lives of so many civilians at risk.” – Irish broadcaster RTE.

🎯IMPACT: The absence of these nations raises questions about the contest’s unity and the role of politics in cultural events.

IN FULL

Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Slovenia have announced they will boycott the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest in protest of the decision to allow Israel to compete. The broadcasters cited concerns over Gaza and allegations of unfair voting practices as reasons for their withdrawal.

Spain’s public broadcaster RTVE, which led calls for Israel’s exclusion, said its board had already decided in September to pull out if Israel participated. “This withdrawal also means that RTVE will not broadcast the Eurovision 2026 final… nor the preliminary semi-finals,” the broadcaster said. RTVE added that its request for a secret ballot on Israel’s participation had been denied, a move it said “increases RTVE’s distrust of the festival’s organisation.”

Ireland’s RTE expressed similar views, stating, “Participation remains unconscionable given the appalling loss of lives in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there which continues to put the lives of so many civilians at risk.”

Dutch broadcaster AVROTROS said participating under the current circumstances “is incompatible with the public values that are essential to us.”

Israel’s President Isaac Herzog has praised Eurovision’s decision to allow his country to compete, calling it “an appreciated gesture of solidarity, brotherhood, and cooperation, symbolising a victory over those who seek to silence Israel and spread hatred.” He added, “Israel deserves to be represented on every stage in the world, and I am fully and actively committed to that.”

The boycott comes amid a tense political backdrop between Europe and Israel. In May 2024, Ireland and Spain, along with Norway, officially recognized Palestine as an independent state, reflecting support for a two-state solution. Israeli officials have previously stated that European countries recognizing Palestine must accept Palestinian migrants, framing it as a reciprocal expectation.

Tensions have also escalated in the European Union (EU), which in September 2025 proposed sanctions against Israel over human rights concerns in Gaza and the West Bank. The measures included suspending certain trade concessions and targeting extremist government ministers and settler activities.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

The DOJ Is Investigating This College for Spending Taxpayer Money on Illegal Immigrants, Punishing Whistleblowers.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division has launched an investigation into the College of DuPage (COD) for allegedly using taxpayer funds to support illegal immigrants and punishing students who speak out against it.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, the DOJ, the College of DuPage, and students allegedly affected by the college’s policies.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The investigation was launched on December 2, 2025, and pertains to actions at the College of DuPage, Illinois, following reports received by the DOJ in recent months.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Reports allege that COD illegally provides public tax support for illegal aliens and unconstitutionally punishes students who speak out about this illicit practice.” – Harmeet Dhillon

🎯IMPACT: The DOJ has warned that federal funding could be pulled from public institutions found to be unlawfully aiding illegal immigrants.

IN FULL

The Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division has opened an investigation into the College of DuPage in Illinois, following reports that the institution is using taxpayer funds to support illegal immigrants and penalizing students who oppose these actions. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon outlined the allegations in a formal notice to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem and Education Secretary Linda McMahon.

According to Dhillon, the college has allegedly provided resources and support to illegal immigrants, including an “Undocumented Student Liaison” dedicated to assisting them. The college’s website also reportedly offers a Frequently Asked Questions section that appears to guide readers on evading immigration enforcement.

The College of DuPage, the largest public community college in Illinois, has been accused of violating the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), which restricts illegal immigrants from accessing most taxpayer-funded benefits. Additionally, the college is alleged to have provided alternate Social Security numbers to illegal immigrants to access taxpayer benefits.

The letter further claims that the college is in violation of 8 USC 1373 by allegedly providing staff and students with information on how to obstruct immigration enforcement actions. Earlier this year, the DOJ announced that federal funding would be withdrawn from public institutions found to be unlawfully aiding illegal immigrants.

“Reports allege that COD illegally provides public tax support for illegal aliens and unconstitutionally punishes students who speak out about this illicit practice,” Dhillon wrote, formally referring the allegations to the Departments of Homeland Security and Education for investigation.

Image by Steve Fernie.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Rwanda and Congo Sign Historic ‘Washington Accords’ at Trump Peace Institute.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo signed a peace agreement aimed at resolving conflicts in eastern Congo.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, President Félix Tshisekedi of Congo, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Thursday at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I do believe this day is the beginning of a new path, a demanding path, yes. Indeed, quite difficult. But this is a path where peace will not just be a wish, an aspiration, but a turning point.” – President Tshisekedi

🎯IMPACT: The agreement aims to ease conflict in eastern Congo, improve humanitarian conditions, and expand U.S. access to critical minerals.

IN FULL

The leaders of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo formally signed the “Washington Accords” peace agreement at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace on Thursday, a venue newly renamed in honor of the American president. Under the terms of the landmark deal, the two African nations agree to observe a permanent ceasefire and disarm the militia proxies operating in the contested territories along their border.

President Trump hosted Rwandan President Paul Kagame and Congolese President Félix Tshisekedi as they signed the accords, which formalize terms the two leaders agreed to in Qatar this past June. As part of the deal, the United States has committed to purchasing rare earth minerals from both nations.

“Today, the United States is also signing our own bilateral agreements with the Congo and Rwanda that will unlock new opportunities for the United States to access critical minerals and provide economic benefits for everybody,” President Trump said, receiving praise from both African leaders. Kagame noted, “We have seen countless magicians and efforts, but none has succeeded in resolving the underlying issues. President Trump introduced a new and effective dynamism that created the space for breakthroughs.”

“I do believe this day is the beginning of a new path, a demanding path. Yes, indeed, quite difficult. But this is a path where peace will not just be a wish, an aspiration, but a turning point,” Tshisekedi added.

The conflict between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda has roots in the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocide and accusations of cross-border militia support. Congo alleges Rwanda backs the M23 rebel group, while Rwanda claims Congo harbors militias hostile to its government. The violence has displaced millions and drawn international concern, with some observers accusing Rwanda of a land grab to secure additional rare earth mineral deposits located in the contested territory.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Zelensky’s Jet Escapes Collision with Four Drones Near Ireland: Report.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Irish authorities are investigating four drones that appeared to follow or attempt to intercept Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s plane as it arrived in Dublin.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Irish authorities, and unidentified drone operators.

📍WHEN & WHERE: December 1, during Zelensky’s state visit to Ireland.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Ukraine deeply appreciates the support and assistance of the Irish people and government… We discussed steps toward ending the war with a guaranteed peace for Ukraine and all of Europe.” – Volodymyr Zelensky.

🎯IMPACT: The drones breached a no-fly zone and raised concerns over security, though Zelensky’s visit proceeded safely.

IN FULL

Irish authorities are investigating an incident in which four drones appeared to shadow or intercept the plane of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as it landed in Dublin during his first official state visit to Ireland. According to reports, the drones breached a no-fly zone that had been established for his flight path, raising serious concerns about their origin and purpose.

Witnesses say the drones, which reportedly had their lights on, hovered for up to two hours above an Irish warship deployed for protection. Observers estimated the drones had taken off northeast of Dublin and reached the point where Zelensky’s plane would have touched down, had it arrived on schedule. The ship lacked the capability to disable them, and Irish warplanes did not intervene. Authorities are examining whether the drones could have been launched from an undetected vessel at sea.

The Óglaigh na hÉireann (Irish Defense Forces) stated that, for “operational security reasons,” it could not discuss the specifics of any alleged incident.

In a post on X following the visit, Zelensky thanked the Irish people and government: “Ukraine deeply appreciates the support and assistance of the Irish people and government… We discussed steps toward ending the war with a guaranteed peace for Ukraine and all of Europe.” He also praised Ireland’s role in supporting Ukraine’s path toward European Union (EU) membership.

The drone incident in Dublin comes amid heightened scrutiny of unmanned aerial operations targeting high-profile figures. Earlier this year, a military commander in Russia claimed that drones targeted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s helicopter during a visit to the Kursk region. The commander said the aircraft was in the “epicenter” of the attack and that Russian air defense forces neutralized the drone before it could reach the flight path. No damage or injuries were reported.

Meanwhile, Kiev and its international partners appear to be inching closer to a diplomatic resolution. According to recent reporting, Ukraine has accepted the core terms of a U.S.-backed peace framework, developed in Geneva, Switzerland, signalling a potential turning point in the nearly four-year war with Russia.

Image via the Houses of the Oireachtas.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Appeals Court Upholds Trump’s National Guard Deployment in D.C.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A U.S. appeals court paused a lower court’s order to end the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., allowing President Donald J. Trump to continue the deployment.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, and National Guard troops from multiple states.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The appeals court decision was issued on December 4, regarding National Guard deployments in Washington, D.C., which began in August.

🎯IMPACT: The decision allows Trump to maintain and increase troop deployments in Washington and potentially other cities, despite legal challenges from Democrats.

IN FULL

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit lifted a lower court injunction that would have required President Donald J. Trump to end the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. by December 11. With the lower court order removed, the deployment of Guardsmen as part of a crime crackdown in the nation’s capital will continue until at least February 2026.

Issuing an abbreviated ruling, the three-judge appellate panel noted that their decision “should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits” and is intended to give the court time to consider the case. In its appeal of the November 20 injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb—a Joe Biden appointee—the Trump administration cited the Thanksgiving Eve terrorist attack against two National Guard members in Washington, D.C. that left one dead and the other in critical condition. Following the attack, President Trump ordered an additional 500 troops to be deployed to the city.

The lawsuit was filed by District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D), who accused Trump of unlawfully taking control of the city’s law enforcement and violating laws prohibiting federal troops from performing domestic police work. Judge Jia Cobb had previously ruled the deployment likely unlawful and temporarily blocked it, but allowed time for an appeal.

Democrat lawmakers have attempted to push back against similar troop deployments in cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, and Portland, calling them politically motivated shows of force. Legal challenges persist, with the U.S. Supreme Court expected to weigh in on the broader issue of National Guard deployments in cities such as Chicago.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Tim Walz Complains That Calling Him Retarded Will Lead to Violence.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) is worried that people calling him “retarded” could lead to violence.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tim Walz, President Donald J. Trump, and people calling Tim Walz retarded.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Walz expressed his concerns at a press conference on December 4.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’d never seen this before. People driving by my house and using the r-word [retard] in front of people.” – Tim Walz.

🎯IMPACT: Walz’s comments come despite much of the political violence in 2025 and 2024 being carried out by far-left extremists, such as the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassinations of President Trump.

IN FULL

Minnesota Governor and failed 2024 vice presidential candidate Tim Walz (D) has complained that people are driving by his home and calling him a retard, claiming that such language could lead to violence, just days after President Donald J. Trump referred to him as “retarded.” During a press conference on December 4, Walz claimed, “This creates danger,” adding, “I’d never seen this before. People driving by my house and using the r-word [retard] in front of people. This is shameful.”

Walz further complained that he has yet to see any elected Republicans agree with him that such behavior is “shameful,” saying, “I’m worried. We know how these things go. They start with taunts, and they turn to violence.”

The comments come just days after President Trump referred to Walz as “seriously retarded” on Truth Social last week, following reports of Somali migrant crime, including accusations of over a billion dollars in fraud. “Somalian gangs are roving the streets looking for ‘prey’ as our wonderful people stay locked in their apartments and houses hoping against hope that they will be left alone,” President Trump said.

“The seriously retarded Governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, does nothing, either through fear, incompetence, or both,” he noted.

The corporate media attempted to make President Trump walk back the comments aboard Air Force One on November 30, but the President doubled down, saying, “Yeah, I think there’s something wrong with him, absolutely, sure.”

He then referred to the Somali fraud case, where some money defrauded from U.S. taxpayers may have ended up funding the Islamist al-Qaeda franchise al-Shabaab. “Anybody that would do what [Walz] did, anybody that would allow those people into a state and pay billions of dollars [to] Somalia… It’s not even a country, because it doesn’t function like a country. It’s got a name, but it doesn’t function like a country. Yeah, there’s something wrong with Walz.”

Notably, hundreds of government workers in Walz’s own administration have accused him of covering up fraud by Somalis and retaliating against whistleblowers.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Town Votes Against Expansion of Islamic Academy.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A zoning board in Hoover, Alabama, unanimously rejected a proposal to relocate a Muslim K-12 school after a heated meeting.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Hoover Planning and Zoning Commission, local residents, and representatives of the Islamic Academy of Alabama.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The meeting took place this week in Hoover, Alabama.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s not about religion. It’s about traffic.” – Jeff Wilson, the Hoover resident who initiated the petition opposing the relocation.

🎯IMPACT: The proposal now moves to the Hoover City Council for a final decision.

IN FULL

Residents of a city in Alabama packed a local zoning board meeting this week in opposition to a proposal to relocate an Islamic school to their town from a nearby municipality. The Hoover Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 against rezoning property currently used for office space to accommodate the Islamic Academy of Alabama, currently located about 12 miles away in the city of Homewood.

Concerns about traffic congestion, adherence to long-term city development plans, and the precedent such a zoning change might set were cited as reasons for the decision. However, pressure from around 200 citizens attending the meeting likely had a significant impact on the zoning board’s decision.

A petition opposing the plan gathered over 1,700 signatures. “It’s not about religion,” said Jeff Wilson, a resident who initiated the petition, “It’s about traffic.” Meadowbrook resident Nancy Cooper also pointed out that six schools already serving more than 5,600 students feed traffic into Highway 119, often turning it into “a parking lot.”

However, some attendees expressed concerns beyond infrastructure. Signs warning of an Islamic “100-year plan” and comparisons to Muslim-dominated Dearborn, Michigan, were seen. One speaker said Muslims had implemented a “long-term cultural takeover” in Britain, drawing applause from some attendees. Commission Chairman Mike Wood interrupted, stating, “We are here to look at whether this school was appropriately placed. We’re not here for that. I’m sorry. We’re not going to listen to that.”

While Monday’s vote is advisory, the final decision now rests with the Hoover City Council, which will review the proposal in the coming weeks.

Image by Don Sniegowski.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Announces Major Changes to Immigrant Work Permits.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced a reduction in the validity period of work permits for certain immigrants, cutting it from five years to 18 months.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Joe Edlow, and immigrants filing for work permits.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The policy announcement follows the deadly terrorist attack on National Guard troops in Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s clear that USCIS must enforce more frequent vetting of aliens. All aliens must remember that working in the United States is a privilege, not a right.” – Joe Edlow

🎯IMPACT: The new policy aims to enhance vetting opportunities and ensure stricter oversight of immigrant work permits.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump announced on Thursday that his administration will move to shorten the validity period for work permits issued to certain immigrants present in the United States. The move follows the deadly terrorist attack against National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., last month.

Under the new policy, immigrants who apply for asylum or other humanitarian designations will only be able to obtain a work permit valid for 18 months. Previously, the permits were valid for five years.

The Trump administration contends the shortened period of validity will allow officials to conduct more frequent revetting of immigrants. “It’s clear that USCIS must enforce more frequent vetting of aliens,” U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Joe Edlow said, adding: “All aliens must remember that working in the United States is a privilege, not a right.”

Notably, the work permit changes come as President Trump ramps up sweeping changes to the U.S. immigration system. The National Pulse reported on Wednesday that the Trump administration is preparing to expand its travel bans to include as many as 32 additional countries. According to a State Department cable, the proposed expansion under current consideration could add dozens more nations to the list of “countries of concern.”

Officials argue the additional restrictions are needed because some countries “lack a competent or cooperative government authority to produce reliable identity documents,” or have histories of visa overstays, producing national security threats, or inadequate cooperation in repatriating citizens ordered removed from the U.S.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Pro-Sharia ‘EPIC City’ Rebrands as ‘The Meadow’ After State and Local Backlash.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A planned “1,000-home Muslim city” in Texas is sparking concerns about Sharia law amid an attempted rebrand by its planners.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The East Plano Islamic Community (EPIC), its cleric Yasir Qadhi, Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R), and counter-extremism analyst Sam Westrop.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The proposed site is located northeast of Dallas, Texas, with construction planned for 2026 or 2027.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Qadhi and his mosque, EPIC, have radicalised generations of Muslims not just in the Dallas area, but across the U.S.” – Sam Westrop

🎯IMPACT: The development, located approximately 40 miles northeast of Dallas, would include 1,000 residential properties, a mosque, Islamic schools, medical clinics, retail outlets, parks, and an elderly care home. While no permits have been filed and construction has not yet begun, organizers have reported strong initial interest in the properties.

IN FULL

A Texas Islamic organization is rebranding a planned “1,000-home Muslim city” after facing significant local opposition and criticism from state lawmakers. The East Plano Islamic Community (EPIC) initially named the project “EPIC City,” but has rebranded it as “The Meadow,” though the housing development remains under state scrutiny.

“One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion,” Governor Greg Abbott (R) said when he signed legislation banning discriminatory residential developments that require homeowners to adhere to Sharia law. He continued: “Another issue at stake is what is called the right to contract. The fact is that religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas.”

After the bill signing, the organizers behind EPIC City moved to rename the project, though its ties to Islamic extremists remain a concern for state officials and nearby residents. Concerns have only increased after recordings from 2001 surfaced of Yasir Qadhi, a cleric linked to the project, expressing extremist views in the early 2000s. In one recording, Qadhi stated, “This is a part of our religion, to stone the adulterer and to kill, by the way, the homosexual. This is also our religion.” He added that such punishments should not be carried out in America but indicated that they would be implemented under an Islamic state. Other recordings revealed Qadhi dismissing the Holocaust as “false propaganda.” Yasir Qadhi has since acknowledged his past statements, calling them a “one-time mistake” made when he was “young and naïve.”

The development, located approximately 40 miles northeast of Dallas, would include 1,000 residential properties, a mosque, Islamic schools, medical clinics, retail outlets, parks, and an elderly care home. While no permits have been filed and construction has not yet begun, organizers have reported strong initial interest in the properties.

Counter-extremism analyst Sam Westrop with the Middle East Forum warns that the project could serve to “radicalise future generations of Muslims” and argues EPIC is seeking to “advance Sharia and other theocratic threats away from the checks and balances of Texas law and order.” EPIC, however, has described itself as a “multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multilingual, non-sectarian, diverse, and open community” that welcomes non-Muslims.

The National Pulse reported in October that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) revealed that entities linked to the EPIC land development project breached federal and state securities laws. The Attorney General requested that the Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) review the findings and refer the case back to his office for further legal action.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Senate Democrats Reveal Plan to Keep Obamacare on Life Support.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Senate Democrats unveiled a plan to extend expiring Obamacare subsidies for three years without reforms, but Senate Republicans are unlikely to support it.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), and other Senate Republicans and Democrats.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The proposal was announced on Thursday, with a vote expected next Thursday, December 11, in the U.S. Senate.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If Republicans block our bill, there’s no going back. We won’t get another chance to halt these premium spikes before they kick in at the start of the New Year.” – Chuck Schumer

🎯IMPACT: The debate over the subsidies could affect healthcare premiums and whether reforms like income caps or abortion funding restrictions are included.

IN FULL

Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), revealed on Thursday their legislative proposal to extend Obamacare subsidies for three years without any changes or reforms. Schumer announced the legislation on the Senate floor, stating, “This is the bill, a clean, three-year extension of [Obamacare] tax credits that Democrats will bring to the floor of the Senate for a vote next Thursday. And every single Democrat will support it.”

Republicans, however, are already balking over the lack of reforms in the proposal. They have advocated for measures such as income caps and restrictions to prevent taxpayer dollars from funding abortions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) indicated a willingness to consider proposals, but a bipartisan compromise has yet to emerge.

Senators Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Mike Crapo (R-ID) have been working on a Republican alternative, which centers on redirecting subsidy funds into Healthcare Savings Accounts (HSAs) rather than paying insurance companies directly. Despite discussions during a closed-door meeting this week, no unified Republican strategy has been finalized.

Schumer warned that failure to pass the Democrats’ plan could lead to significant premium increases for Americans starting in January. He stated, “If Republicans block our bill, there’s no going back. We won’t get another chance to halt these premium spikes before they kick in at the start of the New Year.”

The Senate is expected to vote on the proposal by December 11, as Congress races to address a range of legislative priorities before the year ends.

Image by Adrian Hon.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.