Just one-third of millennials, those born between 1981 and 1996, and Gen Z, born between 1997 and 2012, know that Britain celebrates Remembrance Day to commemorate the end of the First World War, according to a recent Ipsos survey.
Of the 1,000 Britons aged between 16 and 75 surveyed, less than half – 47 percent – were able to answer correctly. Around 30 percent believe Remembrance Day commemorates the end of the Second World War, with others answering the Iraq War, the Napoleonic wars, and the Second English Civil War.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
Millennials and Gen Z scored the lowest at 33 percent. Whereas 53 percent of Generation X, born between 1965 and 1980, and 62 percent of baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, answered correctly.
Worst still, a staggering 35 percent of Gen Z believe it is not important to remember those who died in the First World War, with 24 percent of Millennials concurring.
“Remembrance Day is clearly important to the vast majority of Britons with three in four saying they will mark it in some way. However, its significance is most keenly felt amongst older generations,” stated Ipsos’ director of Research Keiran Pedley.
Renowned historian Lord Roberts called the results of the survey a “damning indictment of history teaching in our schools,” adding, “How immensely disappointing for all that sacrificed their lives that our young people can’t be bothered to learn the first thing about Remembrance Day.”
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has announced the creation of a task force dedicated to addressing “anti-Christian discrimination” within the agency, urging employees to report incidents through a designated tip line.
👥 Who’s Involved: The initiative involves VA Secretary Doug Collins, appointed by President Donald J. Trump, and VA employees. The broader effort reflects the administration’s stance against anti-Christian sentiment under former President Joe Biden.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The announcement was made via a memo on April 22, and it applies across the Department of Veterans Affairs’ system.
💬 Key Quote: Doug Collins encouraged employees to report “any instance of anti-Christian discrimination,” stating such reports should contain “sufficient identifiers such as names, dates, and locations.”
⚠️ Impact: The move is part of a larger effort by the current administration to address bias, paralleling similar task forces in other federal agencies such as the State Department.
IN FULL:
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has initiated a task force to combat “anti-Christian discrimination,” encouraging personnel to report suspected bias through a newly established tip line. Announced through a memo on Tuesday, VA Secretary Doug Collins, appointed by President Donald J. Trump, directed employees to report any instances of discrimination.
This scheme aligns with the administration’s overarching campaign to highlight the anti-Christian sentiment that flourished under former President Joe Biden. Earlier in February, President Trump signed an executive order noting that the previous administration exhibited a significant pattern of targeting individuals due to their Christian beliefs.
The VA’s announcement follows similar initiatives by other government bodies. The State Department, for instance, recently implemented a task force addressing “anti-Christian bias,” with employees being encouraged to report such conduct.
The oversight includes examining how cases of discrimination might manifest within the workforce, such as penalizing Christian practices or denying religious exemptions to vaccine mandates. Previously, the Biden government mandated COVID-19 vaccinations for federal employees and contractors, although the requirement was eventually rescinded following extensive legal challenges.
Attorney General Pam Bondi has been vocal about alleged anti-Christian bias within federal frameworks. Bondi recently convened with various Cabinet officials to deliberate on claims of religious discrimination.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: President Donald J. Trump has blamed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for sabotaging ongoing peace talks with Russia.
👥 Who’s Involved: President Donald J. Trump, President Volodymyr Zelensky, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: President Trump reacted to remarks made by Zelensky on April 23.
💬 Key Quote: “It’s inflammatory statements like Zelenskyy’s that makes it so difficult to settle this War. He has nothing to boast about!” Trump stated.
⚠️ Impact: Zelensky’s remarks make it even more uncertain that a deal will be reached to end the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, as he refuses to recognize Russian control over Crimea.
IN FULL:
President Donald J. Trump is blaming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for sabotaging the ongoing peace talks to halt the conflict between Ukraine and Russia. On Truth Social, President Trump slammed Zelensky, who stated that he would not recognize Russian control of Crimea.
“It’s inflammatory statements like Zelenskyy’s that makes it so difficult to settle this War. He has nothing to boast about! The situation for Ukraine is dire — He can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country,” President Trump wrote.
The President further blames Zelensky for prolonging the killing in Ukraine, saying that the U.S. is close to securing a ceasefire deal that could freeze the conflict on the current lines of contact. Russian President Vladimir Putin has reportedly offered a ceasefire along the current lines of the conflict while a potential deal is being negotiated. Part of Trump’s deal would see the U.S. recognize Russia’s control over Crimea and reject future NATO membership for Ukraine.
Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, long before Zelensky’s election and the current phase of the full-scale conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The region is majority Russian, having only been transferred to Ukraine for administrative purposes by the former Soviet Union in 1954.
White House envoy Steve Witkoff, whom Zelensky insulted just last week, is expected to meet with President Putin in Russia later this week on April 25.
Zelensky, the British, and the French have resisted Trump’s calls for peace in the conflict. French President Emmanuel Macron has consistently floated the idea of sending French troops to Ukraine.
Denmark has already announced it will send troops, ostensibly as observers, which provoked a harsh response from the Russians, who said the NATO troops will be considered legitimate targets.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: Chris Cuomo revealed that his on-air friendship with Don Lemon was orchestrated, and the two are no longer on good terms.
👥 Who’s Involved: Chris Cuomo, Don Lemon, former CNN executive Jeff Zucker.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Statements made on Patrick Bet-David’s podcast in April 2025.
💬 Key Quote: “I am a loyalty guy… that’s the end of the analysis for me… You’re ride or die, or you’re not.” — Chris Cuomo.
⚠️ Impact: The disclosure adds to the turmoil at CNN following the departures of both Zucker and Lemon, and highlights Cuomo’s ongoing legal battle with the network.
IN FULL:
Chris Cuomo, now hosting on NewsNation, has disclosed that his previous camaraderie with Don Lemon at CNN was a ruse, arranged under the directive of former executive Jeff Zucker. This revelation was made during a conversation on Patrick Bet-David’s podcast, unveiling that the banter between the duo was an effort to bolster Lemon’s segment start.
Cuomo was terminated from CNN in 2021 over his involvement in defending his brother, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, during a sexual harassment investigation. He later noted the dissolution of his personal and professional rapport with Lemon. Cuomo expressed disappointment that Lemon did not support him following his departure from CNN, leading to a strained relationship that Cuomo asserted was never genuine to begin with.
The nightly exchange between Cuomo and Lemon, which extended to a collaborative podcast and tour, was suggested by Zucker to control the initial segments of Lemon’s show. Zucker was noted by Cuomo to have strong ties with Lemon, aiding his prominence at the network. “Zucker’s best friend is Don Lemon’s best friend—who’s his agent—so, they had a real bond,” Cuomo said.
Speaking to potential future projects with Lemon, Cuomo dismissed the possibility. “Why would I do it?” Cuomo said. “You think he’s going to apologize to me? I am a loyalty guy… that’s the end of the analysis for me… You’re ride or die, or you’re not.”
In a legal context, Cuomo is litigating against CNN for over $100 million, alleging defamation by his colleagues post-firing. The lawsuit accuses CNN of contractual violations by enabling public criticisms that maligned his reputation.
Following these upheavals, both Zucker and Lemon have exited CNN. Zucker stepped down due to an undisclosed relationship with a network executive, while Lemon faced dismissal over alleged inappropriate behavior.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: A new Economist/YouGov poll reveals stark divisions among Americans on whether Kilmar Abrego Garcia, recently deported to El Salvador, should be allowed back into the U.S., with 90 percent of Kamala Harris voters supporting his return—despite uncertainty about his MS-13 ties.
👥 Who’s Involved: Kilmar Abrego Garcia, alleged MS-13 member; U.S. citizens surveyed by The Economist/YouGov; 2024 voters for Harris and Donald J. Trump.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The poll was conducted April 19–22, 2025, surveying 1,625 U.S. adults, following Abrego’s deportation.
⚠️ Impact: The poll underscores deep partisan divides on immigration policy, but widespread uncertainty about Abrego’s alleged MS-13 ties—meaning public opinion could shift if they are clearly proven.
IN FULL:
A recent Economist/YouGov poll conducted April 19–22, 2025, has exposed a sharp partisan divide over the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an alleged MS-13 member recently sent back to El Salvador by the Trump administration. The survey of 1,625 U.S. adult citizens asked whether Abrego should be allowed to return to the U.S., revealing that 90 percent of Kamala Harris voters in 2024 support his return. However, a separate question on whether or not respondents believe he is a member of the notorious MS-13 gang, as the Trump administration says, reveals that a plurality of 43 percent are unsure. If they can be convinced, public sentiment may shift in favor of his deportation.
While 50 percent of Americans overall support Abrego’s return—after pollsters primed them with a description of him as having been removed “despite a court order prohibiting his deportation”—an overwhelming 90 percent of Harris voters want him back. In contrast, 59 percent of Trump voters reject his return.
Along party lines, 87 percent of Democrats favor Abrego’s return, while 54 percent of Republicans oppose it. Ideology mirrors this split, with 87 percent of liberals backing his return, compared to 61 percent of conservatives who are against it.
A second question in the poll reveals widespread uncertainty about Abrego’s alleged MS-13 membership, with 43 percent of respondents overall admitting they’re “not sure” if he’s part of the gang. This doubt is consistent across demographics: 39 percent of white people, 61 percent of black people, and 45 percent of Hispanics are unsure. Politically, 33 percent of Harris voters and 34 percent of Trump voters also express uncertainty.
Overall, only 27 percent affirmatively believe Abrego is an MS-13 member at present, while 30 percent think he is not.
Recent reports indicate Abrego was arrested in 2022 on suspicion of human trafficking, with eight passengers who all have his home address crammed into his SUV. The vehicle belonged to his “boss,” Jose Ramon Hernandez Reyes, a fellow Salvadoran illegal convicted of trafficking offenses in 2020.
Coupled with recent revelations that his wife filed for a protective order against him for alleged domestic violence, this undermines the media image of him as a blameless Maryland father with a clean criminal record. Further revelations about his alleged MS-13 and criminal ties may turn public opinion against him.
And just 27% are convinced he’s MS-13, as the Trump administration keeps saying.
❓What Happened: Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran deported from the U.S. to El Salvador in March, has been linked to a convicted human trafficker in court documents.
👥 Who’s Involved: Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Border Czar Tom Homan, MS-13, and Abrego Garcia’s family.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: El Salvador, Abrego Garcia deported in March 2025.
💬 Key Quote: Abrego Garcia is “an MS-13 gang member, public safety threat, [and] terrorist.” — Border Czar Tom Homan.
⚠️ Impact: As his alleged ties to foreign criminals become more readily apparent, Abrego Garcia may become more difficult for Democrats to champion.
IN FULL:
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran detained in El Salvador’s CECOT super-prison after being deported under the Alien Enemies Act, has been linked to a convicted human trafficker, embarrassing Maryland’s Senator Chris Van Hollen and other Democrats lobbying for his return to the U.S.
Abrego Garcia’s case has garnered significant media attention. On one side, Democrats and their media allies portray him as a wrongfully deported Maryland family man; on the other, the Trump administration has characterized him as a dangerous illegal immigrant linked to the MS-13 gang. Court documents and reports seen by The Daily Mail have now bolstered the latter narrative, connecting Abrego Garcia to a convicted human trafficker, Jose Ramon Hernandez Reyes.
During a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee, a police officer raised suspicions of human trafficking, finding Abrego Garcia had eight people with no luggage crowded into his vehicle, who all gave Abrego Garcia’s home address as their own. The incident involved prolonged questioning, with Abrego Garcia attempting to throw the officer “off track” and “pretend[ing] to speak less English than he was capable of.”
Abrego Garcia turned out to be driving the SUV, which belonged to his “boss,” Jose Ramon Hernandez Reyes, on an expired license. Hernandez Reyes, a fellow Salvadoran illegal, had been convicted of human trafficking in 2020.
Abrego Garcia and his passengers were all arrested, but the Joe Biden-era Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reportedly instructed the Tennessee Highway Patrol to let him go.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: Dick Durbin, a Democratic senator from Illinois, announced he will not pursue reelection.
👥 Who’s Involved: Durbin, an 80-year-old veteran legislator serving as the Senate’s Democratic whip, and members of his party.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Durbin conveyed his decision on Wednesday, as reported by WBEZ and The New York Times.
💬 Key Quote: “It’s time,” Durbin told WBEZ, referring to his observations about aging colleagues.
⚠️ Impact: Durbin’s departure marks the end of a lengthy political career, potentially influencing Senate leadership dynamics and opening a seat in Illinois.
IN FULL:
Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, a longstanding Democratic figure and the party’s second-ranking member in the Senate, has announced he will not contest the upcoming election. Having served over four decades as a federal legislator, beginning in the U.S. House of Representatives and continuing in the Senate, Durbin cited age as a significant factor in his decision to retire.
The senator, 80, has been a prominent voice within the Democratic party, holding the position of Senate whip under Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. On Wednesday, Durbin shared insights into his choice during an interview with WBEZ, stating, “It’s time.” He emphasized his reflections on the aging process within political circles, noting, “You observe your colleagues and watch what happens. For some of them, there’s this miraculous aging process where they never seem to get too old.”
Durbin’s exit will likely spark discussions on who might vie for his influential role within the party’s Senate leadership and influence the political landscape in Illinois.
As one of the senior figures in the U.S. Senate, Durbin’s decision underscores broader conversations about leadership transitions in a body where long tenures are not uncommon. His departure from active politics opens up potential opportunities for new leaders to emerge and brings attention to the upcoming electoral contest for his Senate seat.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: Former First Lady Michelle Obama discussed her choice to skip President Donald J. Trump’s inauguration and the ensuing rumors.
👥 Who’s Involved: Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and several past U.S. presidents, including Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: The discussion was held during an episode of the podcastIMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson, released recently.
💬 Key Quote: “My decision to skip the inauguration, what people don’t realize, or my decision to make choices at the beginning of this year that suited me were met with such ridicule and criticism,” Michelle Obama complained.
⚠️ Impact: Mrs. Obama’s absence led to public speculation about her personal life and sparked rumors of marital issues with Barack Obama.
IN FULL:
Former First Lady Michelle Obama has spoken publicly about her voluntary absence from President Donald J. Trump’s inauguration in January, explaining her reasons during a recent episode of the low-ratedIMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson. The decision sparked rumors about her personal life with former President Barack Obama, who once wrote that he “make[s] love to men daily… in the imagination.”
During a discussion with actress Taraji P. Henson, Mrs. Obama elaborated on her reasoning, emphasizing it as a personal choice. “My decision to skip the inauguration, what people don’t realize, or my decision to make choices at the beginning of this year that suited me, were met with such ridicule and criticism,” she stated. “People couldn’t believe that I was saying ‘no’ for any other reason, that they had to assume that my marriage was falling apart, you know.”
Speculation of possible marital discord was widespread after Mrs. Obama no-showed at the inauguration, particularly after former President Obama also appeared at former President Jimmy Carter’s funeral alone.
“I’m here really trying to own my life and intentionally practice making the choice that was right for me,” Mrs. Obama insisted, adding that it “took everything in my power to not do the thing that was right, or that was perceived as right, but do the thing that was right for me. That was a hard thing for me to do.”
On April 3, former President Obama admitted he was “in a deep deficit with my wife” during his time in office. Speaking at Hamilton College, he revealed he has “been trying to dig myself out of that hole” since then by doing “fun things.”
In 2022, Mrs. Obama admitted “there were 10 years where I couldn’t stand my husband”—roughly a third of their marriage.
❓What Happened: Intel reportedly plans to reduce its workforce by more than 20 percent.
👥 Who’s Involved: Intel, CEO Lip-Bu Tan, and rival company Nvidia.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Announcement expected this week, unspecified global regions affected.
⚠️ Impact: The tech company faces challenges in artificial intelligence (AI) computing and supply chain disruptions.
IN FULL:
Intel Corp. is preparing to announce a significant workforce reduction, potentially cutting over 20 percent of its employees to address declining sales and bolster its focus on engineering, according to reports. This decision comes as the U.S. semiconductor giant works to regain its competitive edge, having lagged behind companies like Nvidia in artificial intelligence (AI) computing.
Sources indicate that the new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, who recently assumed leadership, aims to streamline operations and enhance the company’s engineering focus. However, Intel has not verified reports of the planned layoffs. The specifics regarding which regions might be affected also remain unclear.
While the corporate media appears to be readying itself to blame President Donald J. Trump’s tariff policy for Intel’s struggles, an exemption for computer parts and related products is already in place, and Nvidia is responding to the new situation over the longer term by reshoring production to the U.S.
Notably, Intel already reduced its workforce by approximately 15,000 under former President Joe Biden last year, ending with 108,900 employees, compared to 124,800 in the previous period.
Once recognized as the premier computer chipmaker worldwide, Intel has been overtaken by firms more adept at capitalizing on AI advancements and the corresponding demand for specialized chips. The company’s approach to AI, now widely seen as a transformative technology, has been considered sluggish.
❓What Happened: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent criticized the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for diverting resources to social issues over economic stability, warning against mission drift.
👥 Who’s Involved: Scott Bessent, IMF, World Bank, Chinese Communist Party.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Washington, D.C., Institute of International Finance forum, Wednesday.
💬 Key Quote: “The IMF has been whistling past the graveyard,” Bessent said, referring to the organization’s focus on social issues at the expense of its core economic responsibilities.
⚠️ Impact: The IMF and World Bank face pressures to realign their missions. Economic forecasts have been affected by U.S. tariff policies, with U.S. growth expectations reduced.
IN FULL:
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent admonished the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Wednesday for prioritizing woke politics at the expense of economic stability. Speaking at the Institute of International Finance in Washington, he highlighted the IMF’s “mission creep,” warning that the agency “devotes disproportionate time and resources to work on climate change, gender, and social issues… crowding out its work on critical macroeconomic issues.”
“The IMF has been whistling past the graveyard,” the Trump official remarked.
Additionally, Bessent directed criticisms toward the World Bank, a United Nations (UN) specialized agency, advising it to control its spending and warning that its officials “should no longer expect blank checks for vapid, buzzword-centric marketing accompanied by half-hearted commitments to reform” for U.S. support.
The backdrop to Bessent’s comments is the IMF’s recent downgrade in U.S. economic growth projections, influenced by hostility to President Donald J. Trump’s tariff policy. The IMF reduced its forecast for U.S. growth in 2025 to 1.8 percent, down from an earlier estimate of 2.7 percent. Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, the IMF’s chief economist, explicitly attributed the forecast change to the tariffs.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓What Happened: President Donald J. Trump expressed concerns over the feasibility of conducting trials for millions of migrants who entered the U.S. illegally.
👥 Who’s Involved: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States; Joe Biden, former President; U.S. federal courts; migrants; suspected gang members.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍 Where & When: Remarks made in the Oval Office; reported on April 22.
💬 Key Quote: “We’re getting them out. I hope we get cooperation from the courts, because we have thousands of people that are ready to go out, and you can’t have a trial for all of these people,” Trump stated to reporters.
⚠️ Impact: Trump’s plans for mass deportation face challenges from federal courts, potentially affecting immigration enforcement and policy execution.
IN FULL:
President Donald J. Trump spoke about the challenges related to holding legal proceedings for potentially millions of migrants who have entered the United States illegally on Tuesday. He emphasized the improbability of providing court trials for every individual due to the sheer volume of cases. Trump stressed the need for expedited deportations to ensure national safety, suggesting that obstructive legal processes could lead to a perilous situation for the country.
“We’re getting them out. I hope we get cooperation from the courts, because we have thousands of people that are ready to go out, and you can’t have a trial for all of these people,” he said, pointing out that the current legal system isn’t designed to accommodate trials at such a large scale.
“A judge can’t say, ‘You know, you have to have a trial.’ The trial is going to take two years,” Trump warned. “No, we’re going to have a very dangerous country if we’re not allowed to do what we’re entitled to do. And I won an election based on the fact that we get them out.”
In a post on his Truth Social platform, he highlighted the double standards involved in allowing Biden to let in millions of migrants with no meaningful legal process, while requiring him to go through the courts every time he has to remove one.
“How can Biden let Millions of Criminals into our Country, totally unchecked and unvetted, with no Legal authority to do so, yet I, in order to make up for this assault to our Nation, am expected to go through a lengthy Legal process, separately, for each and every Criminal Alien,” he demanded. “As usual, TWO DIFFERENT STANDARDS, only leading to the Complete and Total Destruction of the U.S.A.”
Court challenges against the Trump administration, particularly concerning immigration policy, have been a recurring feature of its opening months. Judges like the Barack Obama-appointed U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg have hindered efforts to utilize the Alien Enemies Act to remove migrants swiftly, making it harder to deport illegals linked to organized crime groups like MS-13.
President Trump promised a policy of mass deportations of illegal immigrants, particularly criminal aliens, on the 2024 campaign trail. Past polling suggests that a majority of Americans support the policy.
Jack Montgomery contributed to this report.
show less
PULSE POINTS:
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
