Friday, January 23, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

SHALL BE INFRINGED: New Gun Grab Law Criminalizes Shooting Ranges, Private Security.

Democrat lawmakers on Capitol Hill are teeing up legislation that could result in a massive gun grab and criminalize everything from gun safety training groups to firearm ranges as well as private security teams serving at U.S. churches.

The Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act of 2024 – introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), and reviewed by The National Pulse – creates new federal criminal and civil penalties for armed citizen groups that “publicly patrol, drill, or engage in techniques capable of causing bodily injury or death.” Additionally, the legislation criminalizes groups that “assume the functions of a law enforcement officer, peace officer, or public official, whether or not acting under color of law.”

The House (H.R.6981) and Senate (S.3589) versions of the legislation were introduced recently. Both sit in the Judiciary Committees of their respective chambers. Congressional Democrats claim the legislation is meant to enhance the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) ability to prosecute organized, armed groups who engage in violence and intimidation. However, Rep. Raskin, the lead House sponsor, has also acknowledged the Democrat bill could be used against private militias “[p]atrolling neighborhoods.”

Both Raskin and Markey have leaned heavily on narratives surrounding the January 6 Capitol riots and the 2017 Charlottesville Unite the Right rally as the impetus for their legislation. While a handful of individuals had firearms on January 6, there has been little evidence of any organized militia groups that participated in the riot being armed while at the Capitol — despite the claims by Markey and Raskin. The Oath Keepers acknowledged that they stored a cache of weapons at a hotel several miles away in Northern Virginia. Those were never brought into the District of Columbia or near the Capitol Building.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Kash Patel Is Kicking Out FBI Agents Linked to Anti-Trump Lawfare.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel has reportedly removed senior figures at the bureau connected to lawfare investigations into President Donald J. Trump.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Senior FBI leaders in Atlanta, New Orleans, New York, and Miami, along with FBI Director Kash Patel and former special counsel Jack Smith.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Reported on Friday, with actions spanning multiple field offices, including Atlanta, New Orleans, New York, and Miami.

🎯IMPACT: The precise number of departures remains unclear, and some dismissed agents have already filed lawsuits.

IN FULL

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel has ordered the removal of a number of senior figures at the bureau who were either involved in or helped spearhead politically motivated actions against President Donald J. Trump. It is believed that senior field office leaders in Atlanta and New Orleans, as well as the acting assistant director overseeing the New York field office, were among those removed. Several of the agents have already filed lawsuits to attempt to prevent their removal.

Additionally, as many as six agents in Miami, Florida, were reportedly forced out due to their involvement in the FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago, which included authorization to use deadly force. Other agents removed were tied to the Biden-era Arctic Frost scandal, a corrupt investigation overseen by former FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy Thibault and, subsequently, by special counsel Jack Smith.

News of the firings follows Jack Smith testifying before the House Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill. He was pressed on several instances of overreach, including the subpoenaing of phone toll records pertaining to then House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who was bizarrely considered a flight risk.

On Thursday, Smith admitted that he expects to be indicted for his role in Arctic Frost, and was unable to explain why his investigative team considered McCarthy—who was the newly elected House Speaker—to be a possible risk for fleeing the country.

While Democrats have routinely called Smith the “Gold Standard” of federal prosecutors, Representative Tom Tiffany (R-WI) noted that the former special counsel’s most high-profile cases against American political figures have either been thrown out by the Supreme Court, ended in mistrials, or, in the case of President Trump, dismissed.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

‘We’re Watching Iran’ – Trump Warns U.S. ‘Armada’ Will Arrive in Gulf SOON.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A U.S. “armada” is heading toward the Persian Gulf, President Donald J. Trump, following threats that he will intervene against Iran’s Islamist regime if it massacres protesters.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and ruling mullahs, and Iranian protesters.

📍WHEN & WHERE: January 2026 in the Gulf region, with President Trump’s comments coming as he departed the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We’re watching Iran. I’d rather not see anything happen, but we’re watching them very closely.” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: The U.S. could be poised to strike the Iranian regime, potentially empowering dissidents to oust the mullahs.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has warned that an American “armada” is en route to the Persian Gulf, as thousands are believed dead amid violent protests against the Islamic Republic of Iran’s ruling mullahs. “We’re watching Iran,” he said while departing the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland this week, adding: “I’d rather not see anything happen but we’re watching them very closely.”

President Trump had previously indicated that he would strike the Iranian regime if protesters began to be slaughtered, but the prospect of intervention may have at least somewhat diminished, with Trump saying, “Iran does want to talk, and we’ll talk.”

Nevertheless, he stressed that a “massive fleet” is heading to Iran “just in case.” Earlier this year, a similar naval build-up off Venezuela culminated in a late-night raid that removed the country’s Marxist dictator, Nicolas Maduro, from power.

In his address at the World Economic Forum, Trump noted that the U.S. has previously targeted Iranian uranium enrichment facilities to prevent nuclear weapon development, and that strikes will be repeated if Iran continues its enrichment efforts.

Iranian military leaders have issued warnings to the U.S. and Israel, with General Mohammad Pakpour of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claiming the country is ready for conflict. President Trump recently warned that instructions have been left for Iran to be “wiped off the face of the earth” if he is assassinated.

Iranian authorities confirm there have been over 3,000 deaths from the protests, but civil rights groups argue the actual toll is much higher.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Radical Judge Empowers Leftist Nonprofits to VETO Deportations.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge issued one of the most reckless judgments of recent years late Thursday, essentially granting leftist nonprofits final approval authority over Trump administration deportation orders affecting their members.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young, the Trump administration, the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), the Middle East Studies Association (MESA), and foreign nationals slated for deportation.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued on January 22, 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This Court ruled that the Plaintiffs American Association of University Professors (‘AAUP’) and their associate chapters, and the Middle East Studies Association (‘MESA’) have shown by clear and convincing evidence that Secretaries [Kristi] Noem and  [Marco] Rubio have intentionally and in concert implemented Executive Orders in 14161 and 14188 a viewpoint-discriminatory way to chill protected speech that ‘violated the First Amendment.'” — Judge Young

🎯IMPACT: While Judge Young’s ruling is unlikely to stand on appeal, it marks one of the most radical ever rulings against federal immigration law and the executive branch’s ability to enforce it.

IN FULL

A federal judge issued one of the most reckless judgments of recent years late Thursday, essentially granting leftist nonprofits final approval authority over Trump administration deportation orders affecting their members. U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young, 85, ruled that the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and the Middle East Studies Association (MESA) have continually had their members’ First Amendment rights violated by federal officials by being targeted for deportation over their support of Hamas or similar terrorist groups. Further, as remediation, Judge Young barred the federal government from deporting AAUP and MESA members without the groups’ permission and final approval by a federal judge.

“This Court ruled that the Plaintiffs American Association of University Professors (‘AAUP’) and their associate chapters, and the Middle East Studies Association (‘MESA’) have shown by clear and convincing evidence that Secretaries [Kristi] Noem and [Marco] Rubio have intentionally and in concert implemented Executive Orders in 14161 and 14188 a viewpoint-discriminatory way to chill protected speech that ‘violated the First Amendment,'” the judge wrote.

Young goes on to say, “Any non-citizen member of the plaintiffs AAUP or MESA, who was a member on or after March 25, 2025, and continued as a member through September 30, 2025, shall have a right to institute a proceeding (‘Sanction Action’) in the United States District Court…”

While Judge Young’s ruling is unlikely to stand on appeal, it marks one of the most radical rulings ever against federal immigration law and the executive branch’s ability to enforce it. Not only does Young ignore the jurisdiction of the U.S. Immigration Court system—an error highlighted in a separate case that The National Pulse reported on last week—he makes the drastic move of essentially granting two private nonprofit groups, the AAUP and MESA, veto power over deportation proceedings unless a federal district court judge approves the deportation.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

New Greenland ‘Framework’ Will Cover Minerals: Trump.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump says the “framework” of a future agreement involving Greenland, agreed at the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland, this week, includes rights to rare earth minerals.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald Trump, Danish and Greenlandic officials, and NATO.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Comments made at and following the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland, this week.

💬KEY QUOTE: Notably, Trump has also said he “want[s] Greenland for security, [not] for anything else,” referencing the difficulty of extracting much of Greenland’s natural resources.

🎯IMPACT: Access to Greenlandic mineral deposits could reduce U.S. reliance on China for rare earth minerals, if logistical challenges can be overcome.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has reported progress toward a “framework” agreement on Greenland, centered on enhanced defense cooperation and opportunities to access the island’s rare-earth minerals. Greenland possesses substantial deposits of these vital resources, with Trump saying a deal with the U.S. “puts everybody in a really good position, especially as it pertains to security and to minerals” in the Arctic territory.

According to European assessments, Greenland contains 25 out of the 34 minerals designated as critical raw materials, such as graphite, niobium, and titanium. However, Trump has stressed that his primary motivation for acquiring Greenland is national security rather than resource acquisition, declaring, “I want Greenland for security—I don’t want it for anything else.”

Notably, Greenland lies between North America and much of Russia across the Arctic Ocean, and especially Russia’s nuclear missile silos in the Kola Peninsula. President Trump believes the U.S. needs freedom of action in Greenland to establish his Golden Dome missile defense shield.

The Trump administration has actively worked to decrease dependence on Chinese supplies of rare-earth minerals. Previous steps have included reestablishing a U.S. consulate in Nuuk in 2020 and providing support for mining initiatives in Greenland.

Image by Ville Miettinen.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

ICE Was Accused of Arresting a 5-Year-Old, Here’s What Really Happened:

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Vice President J.D. Vance defended immigration enforcement agents after reports surfaced about a five-year-old boy being taken into federal custody with his illegal alien father.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Vice President Vance, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), five-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos, and his father.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred Tuesday afternoon in Columbia Heights, with Vance addressing it publicly on Thursday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I do a little bit more follow-up research, and what I find is that the five-year-old was not arrested, that his dad was an illegal alien, and when they went to arrest his illegal alien father, the father ran… Are they supposed to let a five-year-old child freeze to death?” – J.D. Vance

🎯IMPACT: The incident has raised further questions about the media’s credibility when covering immigration enforcement actions.

IN FULL

Vice President J.D. Vance defended U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Thursday after a five-year-old boy, Liam Conejo Ramos, was taken into federal custody with his illegal alien father, saying that, contrary to reports, the child “was not arrested” and that agents were enforcing laws while ensuring safety. Vance, who said he was alarmed by the story at first as a parent of young children, explained: “I do a little bit more follow-up research, and what I find is that the five-year-old was not arrested, that his dad was an illegal alien, and when they went to arrest his illegal alien father, the father ran… Are they supposed to let a five-year-old child freeze to death?”

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in a post on X, defended the agents involved, saying Conejo Arias abandoned his child when approached and that officers took care of the boy for his own safety.

“Our officer[s] made multiple attempts to get the mother inside the house to take custody of her child. Officers even assured her that they would NOT take her into custody. She refused to accept custody of the child. The father told officers he wanted the child to remain with him,” DHS said, adding, “Parents are asked if they want to be removed with their children, or ICE will place the children with a safe person the parent designates. This is consistent with past administrations’ immigration enforcement.”

Local educators and the family’s lawyer had claimed officers removed the child from a running car after school and later took him and his father to a Texas detention facility.

The standoff over ICE comes amid widespread far-left agitation against federal immigration operations. Several hotels in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area reportedly canceled bookings for ICE personnel, alleging “heightened public safety concerns” after protests and threats tied to enforcement actions.

On Capitol Hill, Democratic lawmakers have been attempting to block or restrict funding for the Department of Homeland Security and ICE, with senior Democrats such as Minnesota Governor Tim Walz inflamming the public by comparing immigration enforcement agents to Adolf Hitler’s Gestapo.

WATCH HERE:

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Jury Weighs Case Against Man Accused of Putting Bounty on Border Patrol Commander.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Chicago man is on trial for allegedly offering a bounty to kill Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino. Prosecutors argue it was a murder-for-hire plot, while the defense claims the defendant merely shared a social media post.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Gregory Bovino, defendant Juan Espinoza Martinez, and federal prosecutors.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The trial took place in Chicago, Illinois, with the jury beginning deliberations on Thursday.

💬KEY QUOTE:  Messages included statements that “offered $2,000 for information on [Bovino’s] whereabouts and $10,000 if you take him down.”

🎯IMPACT: The trial is a test for the Justice Department, which has struggled with similar prosecutions.

IN FULL

A federal jury in Chicago, Illinois, is weighing the case of Juan Espinoza Martinez, who is charged with offering a bounty for the killing of Gregory Bovino, a senior tactical commander with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Prosecutors allege that Espinoza Martinez sent a series of Snapchat messages in October that amounted to a solicitation for murder.

According to testimony, the messages included statements that “offered $2,000 for information on [Bovino’s] whereabouts and $10,000 if you take him down,” along with an image of the Border Patrol commander. The government argues the messages were intentional and aimed at inciting violence against a federal official.

Defense attorneys counter that the messages were not original threats but forwarded social media posts reflecting anger over immigration raids. Defense lawyer Jonathan Bedi told jurors that “repeating neighborhood gossip is not a crime,” arguing there was no proof his client intended real-world harm. Espinoza Martinez’s brother testified that the messages were expressions of outrage circulating online after enforcement operations in Chicago and were not meant as an actual call to violence.

Bovino has been a visible figure in immigration enforcement under the Trump administration. Federal officials have warned in recent years that criminal organizations and extremist activists have circulated bounties and threats against ICE and Border Patrol agents, including senior commanders. Bovino himself has been targeted during protests, and video has circulated showing an agitator attempting to confront and attack him during a tense standoff involving federal agents.

Image by Chad Davis.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin’s Vought Turns Gaze on Federal Funding for Dem States.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) ordered federal agencies to compile reports on funding provided to Democrat-controlled states in what appears to be a broader federal effort to investigate widespread social services fraud.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Trump White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OMB Director Russell Vought, federal agencies, and a number of Democrat-controlled states.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The memo was issued on January 20, with a deadline for agencies to submit data by January 28.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is a data-gathering exercise only. It does not involve withholding funds, and therefore does not violate any court order.” – OMB memo

🎯IMPACT: The states slated for the data collection include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington—along with Washington, D.C.

IN FULL

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)—under the direction of the agency’s director, Russell Vought—has instructed nearly all federal agencies to compile detailed reports on federal funding directed to Democratic-led states. According to documents that surfaced on Thursday, the directive excludes the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Notably, the January 20 memo emphasizes that this is a “data-gathering exercise only” and states that it “does not involve withholding funds, and therefore does not violate any court order.” While the memo does not outright state the intent of the data-gathering, it is likely tied to ongoing investigations into widespread allegations of social services fraud and the misuse of federal funds in Democrat-controlled states.

The states slated for the data collection include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington state, along with Washington, D.C. The reports are expected to detail federal funding to states and localities, universities, and nonprofit organizations operating within these jurisdictions. Importantly, the funds in question are appropriated by Congress, and the deadline for agencies to submit the requested data is January 28.

Allegations of the criminal misuse and fraudulent disbursement of taxpayer dollars have continued to mount after numerous social services fraud schemes were exposed in Minnesota, most of which have been linked to the state’s large Somali immigrant community. Similar accusations have arisen in Maine and California as well.

The National Pulse reported earlier this month that U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent deployed his department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) to begin a geographic targeting operation for the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, applying extra scrutiny to all businesses engaging in overseas money transfers. In addition to the FinCEN geographic targeting order, Sec. Bessent announced that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will soon launch a task force charged with investigating instances of COVID-19 pandemic relief fraud and violations of 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status by nonprofits tied to the numerous Somali community-linked social services fraud schemes.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Newsmax’s Chris Ruddy Slammed as ‘Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing’ for Opposing Nexstar-TEGNA Merger.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Sinclair Broadcast Group has urged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to approve the merger between Nexstar Media Group and TEGNA, criticizing opposition to the deal—especially those opposed to reforms to ownership caps.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Sinclair Broadcast Group, Nexstar Media Group, TEGNA, National Religious Broadcasters, Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy, and the FCC.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The FCC filing was recently submitted as part of ongoing discussions regarding the merger.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We respectfully submit that many of the Petitioners are wolves in sheep’s clothing,” Sinclair stated in its filing.

🎯IMPACT: Critics of the ownership cap have consistently argued that the restrictions limit a competitive media marketplace and only serve to empower a handful of networks that wish to maintain the status quo of broadcast in America.

IN FULL

Sinclair Broadcast Group has filed comments with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) supporting the proposed merger between Nexstar Media Group and TEGNA. The company criticized opponents of the deal, such as Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy, arguing that the FCC has the legal authority to remove ownership cap limitations that have hindered the merger’s completion.

“We respectfully submit that many of the Petitioners are wolves in sheep’s clothing,” Sinclair stated in its filing, continuing, “They lecture the Commission about competition and the importance of local journalism despite their complete lack of involvement in promoting, preserving, or expanding local news.”

Sinclair, which competes with both Nexstar and TEGNA in 15 markets, emphasized that it supports the merger because it recognizes the broader competitive landscape. “The issues at stake are larger than any single broadcaster or transaction. If the Commission wants to preserve local news, it must modernize its regulations and its conception of the relevant market before it is too late,” the company added.

The comments come in response to opposition from groups such as the National Religious Broadcasters (NRB) and Newsmax, whose CEO Chris Ruddy has called the merger “unprecedented and dangerous consolidation within the broadcast TV industry.”

However, the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) has also weighed in, stating that opponents of the merger rely on “mischaracterized data and legal arguments that ignore today’s competitive landscape.” NAB further criticized Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy’s comments as “transparently insincere.”

Other critics of the caps argue that the ownership restrictions actually cause the very inverse of what Ruddy contends. The National Pulse’s Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam recently noted, “Ruddy keeps telling President Trump that easing television ownership caps, as I discussed with Daniel Suhr on my War Room Boxing Day special, is a bad idea.”

“It is. But only if you want to maintain the status quo of broadcast in America,” Kassam continued, adding that said status quo is, “Dominance by a handful of networks in the face of what should be a reasonably competitive marketplace.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Teases ‘Fourth Term’ in Post-Davos Victory Lap.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump hinted at a “fourth term” after his appearance at the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald J. Trump, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, and European leaders.

📍WHEN & WHERE: January 22, 2026, on Trump’s Truth Social platform.

💬KEY QUOTE: “RECORD NUMBERS ALL OVER THE PLACE! SHOULD I TRY FOR A FOURTH TERM?” – Donald Trump

🎯IMPACT: Trump’s comments will spark discussions about potential constitutional amendments to continue his presidency.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump has teased the possibility of a “fourth term” following his appearance at the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit in Davos, Switzerland. During the summit, he underscored his determination to acquire Greenland from Denmark, and called out Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney for threatening “boots on the ice” in support of the territory. He also advised European leaders opposing the U.S. on Greenland, including Britain’s Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and France’s President Emmanuel Macron, to focus on their energy and mass migration crises rather than on U.S. foreign policy in the Western Hemisphere. Ultimately, NATO chief Mark Rutte announced that the “framework” of an agreement with the President on Greenland had been reached at the summit.

Writing on his Truth Social platform following Davos, Trump wrote, “RECORD NUMBERS ALL OVER THE PLACE! SHOULD I TRY FOR A FOURTH TERM?” This remark has generated significant attention and debate about his intentions.

As only the second American president in history to serve two non-consecutive terms, Trump often alluded to a third term. His mention of a fourth term likely references his belief that he was the rightful President during Joe Biden’s tenure, due to the 2020 election being rigged.

While Trump has dismissed the idea of running for vice presidency in 2028 as part of a novel attempt to bypass term limits, he has expressed enthusiasm for another term if it becomes permissible. MAGA stalwarts such as WarRoom host Stephen K. Bannon continue to advocate for Trump’s candidacy in 2028.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Convicted Felon Democrat Moves to Ban ICE Agents From Police Jobs in Her State.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A Democrat lawmaker introduced a bill to prohibit Washington state law enforcement from hiring people recruited as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents since January 2025.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: State Rep. Tarra Simmons, a felon and advocate for weaker criminal justice policies, introduced the bill.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The bill was introduced this week in Washington state and would take effect on October 1, 2026, if passed.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This shows the stunning hypocrisy of Democrats. Simmons is a convicted felon who has repeatedly pushed to force people to hire felons or offer them housing. Yet when it comes to law enforcement—hardworking Americans who don’t break the law—they should be shamed and discriminated against? It’s absolutely shameful.” – Radio host Jason Rantz.

🎯IMPACT: Critics argue the bill unfairly targets federal law enforcement, while Simmons defends it as a measure to maintain so-called community trust.

IN FULL

Washington state Rep. Tarra Simmons (D) introduced legislation this week that would prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from hiring people who previously served as sworn officers with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The proposal, known as the ICE Out Act of 2026 or House Bill 2641, would apply to anyone recruited by ICE after President Donald J. Trump’s return to office in January 2025, and would take effect on October 1, 2026, if enacted.

Simmons, a Democrat and convicted felon who was re-elected in 2024, is a prominent advocate for criminal justice reform—i.e., weaker sanctions for criminals—and has publicly discussed her own past incarceration for drug, firearm, and theft offenses. Announcing the bill, Simmons claimed, “In this Washington, we have worked incredibly hard to build trust between law enforcement and community,” adding, “The last thing we need is infiltration of ICE agents trained during the Trump Administration to send us backwards.”

The press release accompanying the bill accused ICE agents of engaging in “inhumane and violent tactics,” including detaining individuals without cause, breaking into vehicles, accessing state data systems to locate people, and targeting not only illegal immigrants but also visa holders, green-card holders, and U.S. citizens.

Critics have strongly objected to the proposal. Local radio host Jason Rantz said, “This shows the stunning hypocrisy of Democrats. Simmons is a convicted felon who has repeatedly pushed to force people to hire felons or offer them housing. Yet when it comes to law enforcement—hardworking Americans who don’t break the law—they should be shamed and discriminated against? It’s absolutely shameful.”

The legislation comes amid broader Democrat attacks on ICE and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). In recent months, Democrat leaders in Congress have moved to block or restrict funding for ICE as part of negotiations over DHS appropriations, while pushing legislation aimed at eroding the privacy of ICE personnel, drawing warnings from the administration that such measures could expose thousands of agents to doxxing, harassment, and worse.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.