GET THE APP
Thursday, April 2, 2026

Category: 1A
August 8, 2024
Jack Montgomery
1A
Immigration
UK

‘Think Before You Post’ – British State Brands ‘Hateful’ Posts ‘Online Violence,’ Threatens Prosecutions.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for England and Wales is issuing Orwellian threats to prosecute people for social media posts and even reposts inciting “hatred” amid ongoing anti-mass migration protests, branding them “online violence.”

“Think before you post,” the state prosecutor threatens on social media, warning: “Content that incites violence or hatred isn’t just harmful—it can be illegal.”

“The CPS takes online violence seriously and will prosecute when the legal test is met,” it continues. “Remind those close to you to share responsibly or face the consequences.”

A video accompanying the threat stresses that not only can you be “prosecuted for posting material online which incites violence or hatred,” but “You can also be prosecuted for sharing this material.”

‘SCOURING SOCIAL MEDIA.’

Director of Public Prosecutions of England and Wales (DPP) Stephen Parkinson—whose role was previously filled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer—says that “dedicated police officers… are scouring social media,” warning: “Their job is to look for this material and then follow up with identification, arrests, and so forth.”

Britons enjoy no First Amendment-style free speech protections, and prosecutions over, for example, offensive jokes shared in private messages are commonplace.

Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights confers a notional “freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.” However, this is caveated with a warning that the “exercise of these freedoms… may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.”

show less
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for England and Wales is issuing Orwellian threats to prosecute people for social media posts and even reposts inciting "hatred" amid ongoing anti-mass migration protests, branding them "online violence." show more
August 7, 2024
Christopher Tomlinson
1A
Health
TECH

Revealed: Biden-Harris DHS Pressured Big Tech to Censor Canadian Freedom Convoy.

A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request has shown that the Joe Biden–Kamala Harris regime’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) moved to censor accounts supporting Canadian truckers’ Freedom Convoy.

Emails from February of 2022 between DHS staff reveal that the Disinformation Governance Board was monitoring the Canadian Freedom Convoy protests and was coordinating with social media companies to censor accounts under the guise of stopping “misinformation.”

Convoy protestors shut down several key border points between the U.S. and Canada, including the Ambassador Bridge, which links Detroit, Michigan, with Windsor, Ontario, and sees the highest amount of trade between the two countries.

The Freedom Convoy protests were largely in response to mandates for vaccines for cross-border truckers but became a general protest against vaccine passports and other COVID-19 restrictions.

Millions of dollars were raised for the convoy, leading to hundreds of Canadians being “debanked” when woke Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act and froze their bank accounts.

The protests coincided with several Canadian provinces dropping various restrictions, including vaccine passports, which had previously banned the unvaccinated from different venues.

Several prominent members of the Freedom Convoy were later charged by the government, including those who took part in protests along the Alberta border at the town of Coutts.

In the Coutts case, prosecutors alleged that the convoy activists plotted to murder police, but all were found not guilty of any such plot.

Image via Wikimedia Commons. 

show less
A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request has shown that the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris regime's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) moved to censor accounts supporting Canadian truckers' Freedom Convoy. show more
August 7, 2024
Jack Montgomery
1A
TECH
UK

Chief Prosecutor Warns ‘Dedicated Police Officers’ Are ‘Scouring Social Media’ to Arrest People for Retweets.

Stephen Parkinson, the Director of Public Prosecutions of England and Wales (DPP) under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer—himself a former DPP—warns police officers tasked solely with hunting down people being racially offensive amid the anti-mass migration protests gripping the country, even if all they do is repost others’ content.

“The offense of incitement to racial hatred involves publishing or distributing material which is insulting or abusive, which is intended to or likely to stir up racial hatred,” Parkinson said.

He warned, “If you retweet that, you’re republishing it, and potentially, you’re committing that offense.”

“And we do have dedicated police officers who are scouring social media. Their job is to look for this material and then follow up with identification, arrests, and so forth. So, it’s really, really serious. People might think they’re not doing anything harmful—they are, and the consequences will be visited upon them,” he threatened.

Parkinson has also warned that social media users outside the United Kingdom will also be hunted, particularly if the British state believes their posts are “advancing [an] ideology.”

“We have liaison prosecutors around the globe, who’ve got local links with the local judiciary… We would certainly consider extradition if we are satisfied that an offense has been committed,” he said.

Britain has been rocked by days of sometimes riotous protests following the deadly mass stabbing of several young girls by a migration-background teenager. The authorities have tackled the protestors aggressively—while appeasing violent Muslim counter-demonstrators.

show less
Stephen Parkinson, the Director of Public Prosecutions of England and Wales (DPP) under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer—himself a former DPP—warns police officers tasked solely with hunting down people being racially offensive amid the anti-mass migration protests gripping the country, even if all they do is repost others' content. show more
August 2, 2024
William Upton
1A
Politics
TECH

REPORT: Feds Gave Billions to International Advertiser Group Censoring Conservatives.

A new report reveals the Biden-Harris government has funneled billions of dollars to an international group that has demanded the censorship of conservative voices on social media. According to the evidence released by the Foundation for Freedom Online, the U.S. federal government has underwritten—using taxpayer dollars—the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), which has actively pushed for the censorship of right-leaning media since 2019.

GARM was created as an initiative of the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), which controls roughly 90 percent of advertiser spending worldwide. Four advertising agencies—IPG, Omnicom, WPP, and the Publicis Groupe—are responsible for GARM’s push for censorship. It is also through these agencies that GARM has been funneled U.S. taxpayer dollars.

IPG holds over $1.5 billion in government contracts with the Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Defense (DOD). Omnicom holds roughly $5 billion in contracts with the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Meanwhile, WPP has earned $455 million from work done with the U.S. Navy. Additionally, Publicis Groupe has a $394.2 million contract with HHS.

GARM’S CENSORSHIP CAMPAIGN.

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee produced a report on Thursday detailing how GARM harnessed its control over Internet advertising revenue to pressure social media platforms—like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook—to censor dissident speech and voices on the political right. In the case of X, GARM members claim they were able to severely impact advertiser money that the company’s earnings came in 80 percent below projections.

Another GARM target has been Spotify. The group pressured the podcast and music platform to drop its biggest subscriber draw, Joe Rogan, over various comments the entertainer has made, especially criticism of government policies regarding COVID-19. GARM targeted Spotify advertisers like Coca-Cola, warning the company that Rogan and his comments were “a major area of concern.”

In addition to targeting social media platforms, GARM has also targeted right-leaning media directly. The group has tried to drive advertisers away from news websites like Breitbart and The Daily Wire. This campaign appears to have been coordinated with the global censorship group NewsGuard.

show less
A new report reveals the Biden-Harris government has funneled billions of dollars to an international group that has demanded the censorship of conservative voices on social media. According to the evidence released by the Foundation for Freedom Online, the U.S. federal government has underwritten—using taxpayer dollars—the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), which has actively pushed for the censorship of right-leaning media since 2019. show more
July 30, 2024
1A
News

Professor Wins $2.4M Settlement After Criticizing DEI.

A professor from Bakersfield College has reached a $2.4 million settlement following a legal dispute concerning his questioning of grant funds used for social justice initiatives at the institution. Matthew Garrett, who was a tenured history professor at the California community college, will receive a total of $2,245,480 broken out in monthly payments over the next 20 years and an immediate lump sum of $154,520 as back pay and medical benefits, according to the settlement agreement dated July 10.

As part of the settlement, Garrett has resigned from his position within the Kern Community College District, which includes Bakersfield College, among several other schools. Additionally, the district has agreed to withdraw and seal all accusations of “unprofessional conduct” against him.

Garrett declined to discuss the specifics of the settlement but commented on the events leading up to it. “After five years of administrative misconduct, a decisive courtroom display exonerated me of all allegations and exposed that Kern Community College District engaged in flagrant retaliation for my questioning of partisan policies and wasteful expenditures,” he stated in a recent interview. Facing a likely adverse ruling and potential multimillion-dollar damages, the district opted for a settlement, he explained.

The conflict dates back to at least 2019, when Garrett defended free speech on campus and criticized grant funds earmarked for social justice agendas. Accusations of fiscal impropriety led to administrative action against him. In 2021, Garrett and colleague Professor Erin Miller, who faced similar accusations, filed a federal lawsuit alleging violations of their civil and First Amendment rights and academic freedom by the college district.

Garrett noted that despite the resolution of his case, Miller continues to face retaliatory actions, including class cancellations. Garrett has decided to withdraw from the shared federal lawsuit to allow Miller to pursue her claims independently.

show less
A professor from Bakersfield College has reached a $2.4 million settlement following a legal dispute concerning his questioning of grant funds used for social justice initiatives at the institution. Matthew Garrett, who was a tenured history professor at the California community college, will receive a total of $2,245,480 broken out in monthly payments over the next 20 years and an immediate lump sum of $154,520 as back pay and medical benefits, according to the settlement agreement dated July 10. show more
July 30, 2024
1A
TECH

Facebook Admits Wrongfully Censoring Iconic Trump Assassination Attempt Photo.

Facebook has admitted to wrongfully censoring an iconic photograph of former President Donald J. Trump moments after the July 13 attempt on his life. The image, captured by an Associated Press photographer, depicts Trump with a bloodied face and raised fist, with the American flag flying behind him. Facebook fact-checkers had been flagging the photo, claiming it was altered.

Facebook contends the censorship was supposed to target a manipulated version of the image, which falsely showed Secret Service agents smiling as they surrounded Trump. However, the original, authentic photograph was also censored.

Meta, Facebook’s parent company, acknowledged the supposed mistake following public backlash. Communications Director Dani Lever stated, “This was an error. This fact check was initially applied to a doctored photo showing the Secret Service agents smiling, and in some cases, our systems incorrectly applied that fact check to the real photo. This has been fixed and we apologize for the mistake.”

Facebook uses third-party fact-checkers and artificial intelligence (AI) software to monitor and control content on its platform. According to Meta, AI is used “to scale the work of fact-checkers by applying warning labels to duplicates of false claims and reducing their distribution.”

Meta and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has engaged in extensive election interference in the U.S., mostly through the funding of the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). Meanwhile, a report issued in April found that Facebook has directly interfered with and attempted to influence American elections 39 times since 2008.

In March, The National Pulse reported that an AI system deployed in Washington state erroneously flagged factually true stories as misinformation.

show less
Facebook has admitted to wrongfully censoring an iconic photograph of former President Donald J. Trump moments after the July 13 attempt on his life. The image, captured by an Associated Press photographer, depicts Trump with a bloodied face and raised fist, with the American flag flying behind him. Facebook fact-checkers had been flagging the photo, claiming it was altered. show more
germany
July 17, 2024
Christopher Tomlinson
1A
Media
World

Government Bans Pro-Trump Magazine for Criticizing Multiculturalism.

Germany’s Interior Minister Nancy Faeser has unilaterally banned the right-wing, pro-Donald J. Trump Compact Magazin, accusing the publication of fostering “hatred” of migrants and ethnic diversity. “The ban shows that we are also taking action against the intellectual arsonists who stir up a climate of hatred and violence against refugees and migrants and want to overcome our democratic state,” Minister Faeser said.

“Our signal is very clear: We will not allow ethnic definitions of who belongs to Germany and who does not,” she added.

Several people associated with the magazine, including publisher Jürgen Elsässer, had their homes raided following the ban on July 16. Police also seized the magazine’s assets.

Compact is well-known for its links to the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which lawmakers in Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, are also trying to get banned. The magazine is also noted for being skeptical of Western involvement in the Ukraine war, blaming NATO expansion for the conflict.

Brandenburg state interior minister Michael Stübgen, a member of the so-called “center-right” Christian Democratic Union (CDU) formerly led by Angela Merkel, has said all of Compact‘s social media channels will be scrubbed from the Internet, with their content deleted and revenue confiscated.

Earlier this year, Minister Faeser, who previously wrote for far-left Antifa publications, announced the government would be banning anyone declared a far-right extremist from owning firearms. The government will also trace people who donate to allegedly far-right individuals and groups.

show less
Germany's Interior Minister Nancy Faeser has unilaterally banned the right-wing, pro-Donald J. Trump Compact Magazin, accusing the publication of fostering "hatred" of migrants and ethnic diversity. "The ban shows that we are also taking action against the intellectual arsonists who stir up a climate of hatred and violence against refugees and migrants and want to overcome our democratic state," Minister Faeser said. show more
July 4, 2024
Christopher Tomlinson
1A
Election 2024
SCOTUS

Missouri AG Files SCOTUS Legal Challenge Against Trump NY Case.

Attorney General Andrew Bailey of Missouri has initiated legal action against the State of New York, alleging that its handling of former President Donald Trump’s so-called hush money trial infringed on the First Amendment rights of Missouri residents.

Bailey contends that the legal proceedings and the associated gag orders imposed on Trump restrain the former president from speaking freely during his 2024 reelection campaign, thereby affecting the rights of Missourians to hear him.

The lawsuit petitions the Supreme Court and requests a declaration that New York unlawfully interfered with the presidential election process. Additionally, it seeks to postpone Trump’s upcoming sentencing until after the conclusion of the November election. Finally, it demands the removal of any gag orders against Trump.

Trump’s sentencing in the case was already delayed until September following a motion by Trump’s attorneys that was not opposed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg earlier this week. The motion argues the recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity invalidates the New York conviction.

Bailey argues the requested measures are critical to ensuring that Missourians have unimpeded access to Trump’s viewpoints as they make their decisions in the forthcoming election. According to the lawsuit, the restrictions on Trump’s speech represent a significant overreach and censorship that deprives the public of critical information.

New York’s response to the lawsuit has not yet been publicly disclosed. Observers suggest the case could set a precedent regarding the extent to which legal actions can impact political campaigns and voters’ rights to access unfiltered communications from candidates.

The Supreme Court’s response to Bailey’s petition will be closely watched for its implications on future interactions between state law enforcement actions and federal electoral processes.

show less
Attorney General Andrew Bailey of Missouri has initiated legal action against the State of New York, alleging that its handling of former President Donald Trump's so-called hush money trial infringed on the First Amendment rights of Missouri residents. show more
June 26, 2024
William Upton
1A

The Supreme Court Shunned the First Amendment Today. Sad!

The United States Supreme Court has ruled in a six-to-three decision that the plaintiffs in Murthy v. Missouri lack standing to sue the Biden government over the latter’s pressuring Big Tech companies to censor American citizens for speech they determined to be “misinformation.” Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett declared that the District Court and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’s decisions issuing an injunction barring the Biden government from communicating with social media platforms is to be lifted.

Additionally, Barrett and the court‘s majority—comprised of Justices Roberts, Kavanaugh, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson—ruled that the case should be remanded back to the Fifth Circuit with the specific instructions that the plaintiffs lack standing under Article III of the Constitution. Meanwhile, a District Court and the Fifth Circuit had previously held that the lawsuit could proceed under Article III.

Murthy v. Missouri stems from a series of lawsuits by several U.S. states and a handful of social media users. The plaintiffs allege various agencies and officials in the Biden government violated Americans’ First Amendment free speech rights by pressuring social media platforms to remove content they deemed “to be false or misleading.”

The Supreme Court examined the Biden government’s communications with tech companies, specifically those involving the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election. Justice Barrett states, ” And while the record reflects that the Government defendants played a role in at least some of the platforms’ moderation choices, the evidence indicates that the platforms had independent incentives to moderate content and often exercised their own judgment.”

From this determination, the court held that the plaintiffs could not demonstrate “their ‘direct censorship injuries'” and could not satisfy the requirements for Article III standing.

show less
The United States Supreme Court has ruled in a six-to-three decision that the plaintiffs in Murthy v. Missouri lack standing to sue the Biden government over the latter's pressuring Big Tech companies to censor American citizens for speech they determined to be "misinformation." Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett declared that the District Court and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals's decisions issuing an injunction barring the Biden government from communicating with social media platforms is to be lifted. show more
June 25, 2024
Jack Montgomery
1A
UK
World

Tommy Robinson Arrested in Canada.

Plainclothes officers in Alberta, Canada, have arrested independent journalist and anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson shortly after he finished delivering a speech against mass migration in Calgary. He delivered a defiant “F**k Justin Trudeau” as he was forced into a police car in handcuffs.

Robinson shot a covert video in the police car after his arrest, asking who had ordered it. Officers informed him that it had been authorized by “the minister’s delegate”—referring to a minister in Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s far-left government.

Robinson has now been released, but the Trudeau regime is ordering him to turn in his passport and remain in southern Alberta until a hearing is arranged. He says he has not been told why the state is pursuing him beyond “immigration violations.”

His release conditions prevent him not only from returning home but from delivering planned speeches in Edmonton and Toronto.

The British government is also pursuing Robinson. The Attorney General’s Office–run by a Conservative Member of Parliament (MP)–is moving a case against him for alleged contempt of court related to a defamation settlement. The far-left HOPE Not Hate organization funded by George Soros is the instigator in the case, having presented the Attorney General’s Office with a dossier of supposed evidence against Robinson.

This follows a failed attempt by London’s Metropolitan Police to prosecute Robinson for failing to comply with a dispersal order. The force had pepper-sprayed and forcibly ejected Robinson from a march against anti-Semitism, claiming his mere presence was causing “alarm and distress.” A judge ruled the order was not lawful.

show less
Plainclothes officers in Alberta, Canada, have arrested independent journalist and anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson shortly after he finished delivering a speech against mass migration in Calgary. He delivered a defiant "F**k Justin Trudeau" as he was forced into a police car in handcuffs. show more