Thursday, September 18, 2025

Musk ATTACKS Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Elon Musk publicly criticized President Donald J. Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” in an interview with the corporate media.

👤Who’s Involved: Elon Musk, President Trump, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and the U.S. House of Representatives.

🧾Key Quote: “I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don’t know if it can be both,” Musk told CBS.

⚠️Fallout: Musk’s remarks come amid significant downward revisions to DOGE’s initial projected savings, raising questions about his competence to publicly critique the “big, beautiful bill.”

📌Significance: Musk’s comments risk fracturing support for a major Trump legislative win, as the administration moves forward with its pledges to cut taxes while increasing spending on defense and border security.

IN FULL:

Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) frontman Elon Musk is undermining one of President Donald J. Trump’s hallmark second-term initiatives this week, casting public doubt on the “One Big Beautiful Bill” that recently passed in the House of Representatives. Speaking to CBS, Musk remarked: “I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don’t know if it can be both.”

The legislation—championed by President Trump and widely supported by the America First movement—includes broad fiscal reforms, tax relief, and administrative restructuring designed to streamline federal governance. However, Musk’s public critique suggests the package may inflate the budget deficit and undermine his largely unsuccessful efficiency cuts.

“I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,” Musk complained.

While the bill does fulfill Trump’s key campaign promises to cut taxes on tips, overtime, and social security, it also increases spending on border security and defense to fund major initiatives backed by Trump and congressional Republicans.

Notably, the “big, beautiful bill” is a reconciliation bill. Senior Trump administration official Stephen Miller has explained that “DOGE cuts are to discretionary spending,” and Senate budget rules stipulate that “you cannot cut discretionary spending (only mandatory) in a reconciliation bill.”

DOGE was initially projected to save the federal government up to $2 trillion through automation, auditing, and streamlining. However, those estimates have been revised significantly downward, with current projected savings closer to $150 billion.

Musk’s remarks feature in a preview of a CBS interview that will air in full on June 1.

WATCH:

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

BREAKING: Hamas Chief Is Dead, Says Netanyahu.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has announced the elimination of Hamas Gaza chief Mohammad Sinwar, the younger brother of the group’s deceased leader Yahya Sinwar.

Speaking at the Knesset, Netanyahu declared, “We have eliminated Mohammed Deif, Yahya Sinwar, and Mohammed Sinwar,” marking another blow to the terrorist organization responsible for the October 7, 2023, massacre.

The announcement underscores Israel’s relentless campaign to dismantle Hamas, a mission aligned with President Donald J. Trump’s unwavering support for America’s key ally in the Middle East.

Mohammad Sinwar’s killing comes seven months after the death of his brother Yahya, known as the architect of the October 7 attack, who was taken out on October 17, 2024, in Rafah, Gaza.

This story is developing…

show less
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has announced the elimination of Hamas Gaza chief Mohammad Sinwar, the younger brother of the group’s deceased leader Yahya Sinwar. show more

The Catastrophic Impact of Illegal Migrant Healthcare Revealed.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The state Medi-Cal program in California went insolvent earlier this year, requiring $3.44 billion in loans, with Republicans pointing to healthcare coverage for illegal immigrants as a major contributing factor.

👥 Who’s Involved: Governor Gavin Newsom (D), the California Legislative Latino Caucus, California taxpayers, and illegal aliens.

📍 Where & When: California; budget discussions ongoing.

💬 Key Quote: “The cost of providing free healthcare to illegal immigrants is $11.4 billion, so if we just didn’t do that, that would eliminate our budget deficit,” said State Senator Brian Jones (R).

⚠️ Impact: California faces a $12 billion budget deficit, with debates over healthcare costs for illegal immigrants, potential tax hikes, and federal funding changes adding pressure.

IN FULL:

California’s Medi-Cal, the state-run Medicaid program that provides healthcare for low-income residents and illegal immigrants, has gone insolvent, requiring $3.44 billion in loans earlier this year to continue operations. The program has become a focal point of the state’s ongoing budget crisis, with a $12 billion deficit looming, and some Democrats in the state legislature are pushing tax hikes instead of needed reforms to Medi-Cal.

Republican lawmakers, including State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, have been vocal in attributing much of the financial strain to the state budget on the inclusion of illegal immigrants in Medi-Cal coverage. “The cost of providing free healthcare to illegal immigrants is $11.4 billion, so if we just didn’t do that, that would eliminate our budget deficit,” Jones stated. However, he acknowledged other potential areas for budget savings.

The National Pulse previously reported that Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration has proposed adjustments to Medi-Cal, including pausing enrollment for illegal immigrants aged 19 and older in “full-scope coverage” and introducing a $100 monthly premium for illegals currently enrolled in the healthcare program. However, the Democrat governor’s solution is already receiving pushback from within the California Democratic Party.

Members of the California Legislative Latino Caucus are balking at Newsom’s proposed pause and premium hike. Instead, they are pushing for tax increases to bridge the funding gap and eliminate the $12 billion deficit. Newsom, who is eyeing a potential 2028 presidential bid, has thus far been non-committal on a potential tax increase to cover the budget.

Despite Republicans and Democrats like Newsom both pointing the finger at illegal immigrant enrollment as a primary driver of the budget deficit and Medi-Cal insolvency, the problem may be far more systemic.

“A lot of doctors in California that used to provide Medicare and Medicaid have closed up shop, moved to other states. A lot of other doctors that are still here have stopped taking those kinds of patients, even if they’re here legally or illegally, because the reimbursement rates are so low, the doctors actually lose money when they take a Medicare or Medicaid patient,” said State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones.

Potential federal changes to Medicaid funding could also complicate matters for California. Currently, Congress is considering reducing the federal match rate for non-emergency care from 90 percent to 80 percent. Newsom warns that such changes could cost the state billions.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Farage Introduces Natalist Policies.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Reform Party leader Nigel Farage outlined policy proposals, including scrapping a two-child benefit cap, increasing tax breaks for married couples, and raising the income tax threshold, to support family formation.

👥 Who’s Involved: Nigel Farage, the Reform Party, British parents and prospective parents.

📍 Where & When: Central London, during a speech by Farage.

💬 Key Quote: “These proposals are expensive but we genuinely believe we can pay for it,” said Farage.

⚠️ Impact: Farage’s proposals show he is embracing natalist policies, adopting a Hungarian-style position on supporting citizens who want to form families as an alternative to mass migration in the face of a declining fertility rate.

IN FULL:

Reform Party leader Nigel Farage has unveiled a series of policy proposals aimed at supporting families and lower-paid workers, including scrapping a two-child cap on Child Benefit payments and introducing more generous tax breaks for married couples. Speaking in central London, Farage stated his party’s intention to make it easier for people to have children, while also raising the threshold for paying income tax from £12,570 (~$17,000) to £20,000 (~$27,000).

Farage emphasized that lifting the two-child cap, which currently prevents most families from claiming benefits for third or additional children born after April 2017, is not about promoting a “benefits culture” but instead providing relief for working families. Farage estimated the policy would cost £3.5 billion (~$4.7 billion), which is less than the current annual spend on migrant hotels—which he opposes.

Additionally, the populist leader proposed exempting one partner in a marriage from paying tax on the first £25,000 of their income, alongside raising the personal allowance—roughly equivalent to America’s standard deduction—for everyone earning from £12,570 (~$17,000) to £20,000 (~$27,000). Farage argued that these measures would strengthen families, stating, “Making marriage a little bit more important” would give children “the best chance of success.”

Increasingly, with the Western fertility rate well below replacement, populist parties like Reform are embracing a measure of state support for family formation, as an alternative to the mass migration pushed by left-wing and globalist parties.

Farage argues his policies could be funded by scrapping net-zero climate initiatives, halting hotel accommodations for asylum seekers, cutting public sector diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, and reducing taxpayer-funded quangos.

Farage also addressed other topics, including the winter fuel payment cuts, which he vowed to reverse, and abortion limits, calling it “utterly ludicrous” for terminations to be allowed at 24 weeks when hospitals work to save babies born at 22 weeks.

The speech follows recent electoral gains for Reform, including a parliamentary by-election victory, two mayoral wins, and 677 new municipal councillors. Farage described the party as “the party of the working people,” contrasting with the formerly governing but now “irrelevant” Conservative Party.

Image by Owain.davies.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump Suspends Importation of Foreign Students.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: The Trump administration has instructed U.S. missions abroad to halt new appointments for student and exchange visitor visa applicants as it reviews and plans to expand social media vetting.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Donald J. Trump’s administration, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, and foreign students.

📍 Where & When: U.S. missions worldwide, as of a cable sent Tuesday, May 27, 2025.

💬 Key Quote: “We will continue to use every tool we can to assess who it is that’s coming here, whether they are students or otherwise,” said State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce.

⚠️ Impact: The move impacts international students and exchange visitors. Last week, a federal judge temporarily blocked a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) directive revoking Harvard University’s certification to enroll foreign students.

IN FULL:

The Trump administration has directed U.S. missions overseas to cease scheduling new appointments for foreign student and exchange visitor visa applicants while it reviews and prepares to implement expanded social media vetting processes, according to an internal State Department cable. According to the cable, attributed to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the State Department plans to update procedures for screening foreign students under F, M, and J visa categories. It advises consular sections to suspend new appointments, though existing ones may proceed under current guidelines.

“The Department is conducting a review of existing operations and processes for screening and vetting of student and exchange visitor visa applicants and plans to issue guidance on expanded social media vetting for all such applicants,” the cable states.

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, while declining to comment on the cable, emphasized the administration’s commitment to rigorous vetting. “We will continue to use every tool we can to assess who it is that’s coming here, whether they are students or otherwise,” Bruce said during a press briefing. The expanded vetting process is expected to require adjustments to resources and operations at consular sections globally. Additionally, the cable underscores prioritizing services for U.S. citizens, immigrant visas, and fraud prevention amid these changes.

The National Pulse reported last week that the Trump administration had moved to revoke Harvard University‘s ability to import foreign students under the student visa program. The decision cites “pro-terrorist conduct” at campus protests and the university’s failure to comply with federal reporting requirements. However, the directive was subsequently temporarily blocked by a federal judge appointed by former President Barack Obama.

Notably, Harvard’s foreign student population comprises 27 percent of its total enrollment.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Tesla Really Is Struggling.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: Tesla’s vehicle registrations in Europe dropped by 49 percent in April 2025 compared to the same month in 2024, despite a rise in overall electric vehicle sales.

👥 Who’s Involved: Tesla, Elon Musk, European Automobile Manufacturers Association, and European consumers.

📍 Where & When: European Union (EU), European Free Trade Association (EFTA), United Kingdom; April 2025.

⚠️ Impact: Tesla’s declining sales highlight challenges from rising competition and Musk’s brand reputation issues.

IN FULL:

Tesla, led by Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) frontman Elon Musk, experienced a significant 49 percent decline in European vehicle registrations in April 2025 compared to the same period last year, according to data from the European Automobile Manufacturers Association. The company registered just 7,261 vehicles in the European Union (EU), European Free Trade Association (EFTA), and the United Kingdom, a sharp drop from April 2024 figures.

The decrease comes despite a 26.4 percent increase in overall battery-electric vehicle sales across Europe during the first four months of 2025, with 558,262 units sold, capturing 15.3 percent of the market share. Tesla’s refreshed Model Y, launched recently and expected to boost sales, has so far failed to deliver the anticipated results.

Musk’s optimism regarding Tesla’s future sales prospects was expressed during a recent earnings call, where he assured investors that numbers would rebound following factory adjustments for the updated Model Y. However, the brand’s struggles appear to be compounded by increasing competition from European and Chinese manufacturers and Musk’s political involvement.

Musk’s support for Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) party ahead of the German federal elections and his role in DOGE is believed to have alienated European liberals in the market for electric cars, contributing to Tesla’s challenges.

The reputational damage extends to Tesla and Musk’s other ventures as well. A recent survey ranking corporate reputations placed Tesla at 95th and SpaceX at 86th, a dramatic fall from their top 10 positions just four years ago.

While Musk has indicated plans to reduce his political involvement and refocus on Tesla, his professional attention remains divided among several priorities, including artificial intelligence, robotics, and self-driving technology.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

Trump Tariffs Revenues Soar AGAIN, Creating More Wealth for America.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: U.S. government tariff receipts for May have already surpassed $22.3 billion.

👥 Who’s Involved: President Donald J. Trump, U.S. Treasury Department.

📍 Where & When: United States, May 2023.

💬 Key Quote: “We’re going to make a lot of money [from tariffs] and that money’s going to be used to reduce taxes,” Trump said on April 23.

⚠️ Impact: Tariff revenues have surged, now representing around four percent of federal revenue overall.

IN FULL:

Tariff revenues collected by the U.S. government in May have already exceeded $22.3 billion, according to data from the Treasury Department. A significant deposit of over $16.5 billion was recorded on May 22 alone.

This spike in receipts, categorized under “Customs and Certain Excise Taxes,” has been driven by President Donald J. Trump’s trade policies, aimed at encouraging the reshoring of American manufacturing from foreign countries.

The total for May has already surpassed the $17.4 billion collected in April and the $9.6 billion in March. Since January 1, more than $92 billion has flowed into government coffers.

The surge follows the implementation of a 10 percent tariff on nearly all imports starting April 5, marking the first full month these duties were in effect. Additional tariffs on products such as steel and aluminum are in place for most countries, and some countries also face tariffs particular to them, with China paying a 20 percent tariff for its role in the U.S. fentanyl crisis, for instance.

May did see tariff reductions on many imports from China and the United Kingdom. However, despite these concessions, President Trump hinted at the possibility of further tariffs, warning on social media, “I am empowered to ‘SET A DEAL’ for Trade into the United States if we are unable to make a deal.”

The America First leader has also indicated plans for new tariffs targeting specific sectors that make important products abroad, such as semiconductors and pharmaceuticals and potentially companies like Apple and Samsung. These tariffs are part of broader efforts to reshape U.S. manufacturing and generate revenue.

Historically, tariff revenues have accounted for approximately two percent of federal revenue, with the recent surge roughly doubling that figure to around four percent.

“We’re going to make a lot of money [from tariffs] and that money’s going to be used to reduce taxes,” Trump stated on April 23.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more
Trump Border Mass Deportations

Illegal Migrant Processing Centers Are Shuttering… Because There Aren’t Any New Illegal Migrants.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: U.S. Border Patrol is shuttering an illegal immigrant processing facility in the San Diego Sector, as the number of unlawful border crossings has plummeted by over 96 percent under President Donald J. Trump.

👥 Who’s Involved: U.S. Border Patrol; the former Biden government, and the Trump Administration.

📍 Where & When: San Diego Sector; May 27, 2025.

⚠️ Impact: President Trump’s push to mass deport criminal illegal immigrants and shut down illegal border crossings has caused a dramatic decline in unlawful entries into the United States. The San Diego Sector has seen a 96 percent drop in illegal crossings, while encounters are down by an estimated 95 percent.

IN FULL:

A temporary illegal immigrant processing facility in the San Diego Sector, constructed during the Biden government, has been dismantled following a sharp decline in illegal border crossings, U.S. Border Patrol announced. The facility’s removal comes as the sector reports an over 96 percent drop in illegal entries, reflecting intensified border enforcement measures.

The San Diego Sector, a historically active area for illegal crossings, saw a dramatic decrease in activity, prompting authorities to decommission the soft-sided structure. The Biden government initially established the facility to manage high volumes of foreign nationals entering the U.S. illegally under the Democrats.

This development coincides with nationwide efforts under President Donald J. Trump to apprehend and remove criminal illegal immigrants. Over the past weekend alone, authorities say they’ve made multiple arrests of individuals with serious criminal records as part of that effort.

The National Pulse has previously reported on Trump White House border czar Tom Homan stating that the total number of illegal immigrant “gotaways” has dropped by 99.99 percent since the American First leader took office. Meanwhile, total border encounters across sectors are down by an estimated 95 percent.

Dismantling the San Diego processing facility marks an important step in the continued transition away from the former Biden government’s open borders policies. Under Trump, border resources that had previously been used to encourage mass immigration, such as the CBP One app, have been retooled to discourage illegal crossings and encourage illegal immigrants in the United States to self-deport.

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

King Charles Engages in Cringeworthy ‘Land Acknowledgement’ While Opening Canadian Parliament.

PULSE POINTS:

What Happened: King Charles III delivered his first in-person Speech from the Throne in Canada, opening with a so-called “land acknowledgment” and endorsing the liberal agenda of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s minority government.

👤 Who’s Involved: King Charles III, the Algonquin Anishinaabe people, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, and U.S. President Donald J. Trump.

🧾Key Quote: “We are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people,” the King said.

⚠️Fallout: The King’s remarks were seen as affirming progressive land ownership narratives and indirectly criticizing President Donald J. Trump’s America First.

📌 Significance: Charles’s speech reflects a sharp pivot from traditional neutrality to overt political signaling—endorsing globalism, challenging U.S. influence, and parroting leftist rhetoric on land and immigration in his official role as Canada’s monarch.

IN FULL:

King Charles III has delivered his first Speech from the Throne as King of Canada in Ottawa, the first offered by a Sovereign in person, rather than by the Governor-General who represents him in countries beyond the United Kingdom, since the late Queen Elizabeth II in 1977. However, he began it with a so-called “land acknowledgement,” implying that Indians—as Canadian natives are officially termed—are the true owners of the land Ottawa stands on. The Democrats announced their 2024 platform with a similar acknowledgment in the U.S.

“I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people,” the King said from the throne in the Senate Chamber of the Parliament of Canada, continuing: “This land acknowledgement is a recognition of shared history as a nation.”

“While continuing to deepen my own understanding, it is my great hope that in each of your communities, and collectively as a country, a path is found toward truth and reconciliation, in both word and deed,” he added.

The King’s speech, written by the Liberal minority government of Prime Minister Mark Carney, also appeared to take several digs at U.S. President Donald J. Trump, who has talked about Canada becoming his country’s 51st state. “As the anthem reminds us: The True North is indeed strong and free!” the King said, in what is widely interpreted as a reference to the “51st state” discourse.

He also said the “system of open global trade that, while not perfect, has helped to deliver prosperity for Canadians for decades, is changing,” adding, “Canada’s relationships with partners are also changing,” in what was obviously a reference to President Trump’s tariff policies.

The speech also endorsed mass migration, stating that ” a confident Canada, which has welcomed new Canadians, including from some of the most tragic global conflict zones, can seize this opportunity by recognising that all Canadians can give themselves far more than any foreign power on any continent can ever take away.”

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more

America’s Internet Infrastructure Is Riddled with Chinese Spy Tech. Here’s How…

PULSE POINTS:

What happened: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Nathan Simington warned that Chinese telecom giant Huawei embedded potentially dangerous hardware in rural U.S. Internet infrastructure near military sites, exploiting a funding delay in Congress’s mandated removal plan.

👤Who’s Involved: Nathan Simington, the FCC, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Huawei, Congress, and rural American telecom providers.

🧾Key Quote: “Huawei had a great business… because the first hit is free,” Simington said.

⚠️Fallout: The $4.98 billion “rip and replace” effort remains incomplete, leaving U.S. national security vulnerable to Chinese surveillance via telecom and even solar infrastructure.

📌Significance: Simington’s revelations expose the extent to which CCP-linked companies penetrated America’s digital backbone and how regulatory inaction and cost-cutting left critical systems exposed to foreign adversaries.

IN FULL:

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Nathan Simington warns that Huawei’s infiltration of rural American Internet networks has turned them into potential “pain points” for national security. In an interview, Simington outlined how the Chinese telecom giant embedded its low-cost equipment in rural broadband infrastructure, particularly in regions surrounding sensitive U.S. military installations.

Though Congress passed a 2019 mandate requiring the removal of Huawei hardware from U.S. networks, lawmakers failed to fund the effort for years. The required $4.98 billion wasn’t approved until December—leaving a dangerous gap in which Chinese components remained active in vital communication systems across the country.

“You probably saw last week that we found undisclosed communications equipment in some Chinese-made solar panels,” Simington said. “The solar panels have the ability to phone home just like E.T.… At a certain point, you have to ask yourself, what isn’t phoning home?”

The FCC’s “rip and replace” initiative was originally projected to cost $1.9 billion. Simington now places the estimate at $5.6 billion, a staggering overrun he sees as the inevitable cost of relying on “cheap” solutions offered by the Chinese Communist Party’s tech arms. “There’s nothing as expensive as a cheap product,” he said.

Huawei’s predatory pricing strategy—offering razor-thin financing terms like zero percent interest for up to 60 years—effectively locked in small rural telecom companies operating on the margins. “Huawei had a great business… because the first hit is free,” Simington explained. “Huawei doesn’t need to make profits in order to compete in the capital markets for investor capital the way that a normal company in the United States or elsewhere in the free world would.”

Perhaps most alarming was Simington’s allegation that Huawei specifically targeted rural providers near U.S. military installations, raising red flags about foreign surveillance. “If an American company had pulled the same stunt in China,” he said, “the executives would have found themselves in shallow graves.”

While Simington made clear he’s not advocating for similar measures, he emphasized the situation is “really intolerable.”

WATCH:

show less

PULSE POINTS:

show more