Tuesday, November 4, 2025

White House Confirms No Plans for Trump-Putin Meeting in Near Future.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump will not meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the immediate future, despite earlier indications of a potential meeting in Budapest, Hungary.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on October 21, with prior discussions involving meetings in Budapest, Hungary, and Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Secretary Rubio and Foreign Minister Lavrov had a productive call. Therefore, an additional in-person meeting between the Secretary and Foreign Minister is not necessary, and there are no plans for President Trump to meet with President Putin in the immediate future,” a senior White House official said.

🎯IMPACT: Trump had previously indicated on social media that the Budapest meeting would be the next step in his diplomatic efforts.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump will not meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the foreseeable future, a senior White House official confirmed Tuesday. The decision comes despite earlier suggestions from Trump that a summit in Budapest, Hungary, could help move toward ending the war in Ukraine.

The announcement follows a phone call earlier this week between U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. The White House described the conversation as “productive,” and officials said it removed the need for any immediate in-person follow-up. “Therefore, an additional in-person meeting between the Secretary and Foreign Minister is not necessary, and there are no plans for President Trump to meet with President Putin in the immediate future,” the official stated.

Trump had previously indicated on social media that the Budapest meeting would be the next step in his diplomatic efforts. “President Putin and I will then meet in an agreed-upon location, Budapest, Hungary, to see if we can bring this ‘inglorious’ war, between Russia and Ukraine, to an end,” he wrote on October 16.

Last week, Trump hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House. Zelensky requested long-range Tomahawk missiles and other advanced military systems, which he believes are critical to striking Russia’s infrastructure. Trump has not made any public commitments to provide those weapons.

While the summit is now on hold, Trump emphasized his continued focus on peace efforts during a meeting with Republican lawmakers on Tuesday. “We’re working on number nine,” he said, referring to his broader push to resolve global conflicts. The administration has also proposed a trilateral summit including Trump, Putin, and Zelensky, and has pledged not to send U.S. troops to Ukraine under any peace agreement. In addition, the administration has authorized sharing intelligence with Ukraine on Russian energy infrastructure, a move aimed at helping Ukraine target Russia’s economic lifelines.

Meanwhile, a large fire broke out Monday night at Hungary’s Danube Refinery in Százhalombatta, just south of Budapest. The facility, which processes primarily Russian crude oil, is one of the few in the EU still heavily reliant on Russian energy imports. Firefighters contained the blaze, and no injuries were reported, but investigators are examining whether the incident was accidental or deliberate.

The timing of the fire, amid sensitive geopolitical negotiations and multiple recent disruptions at regional refineries, has raised concerns of potential sabotage, similar to what occurred at the Nord Stream 2 pipeline in 2022. Last month, a Ukrainian national was arrested in Poland following an arrest warrant issued by Germany.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

‘No Kings’ Flyers Threaten Violent Uprising Unless SCOTUS and ICE Are Abolished.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A flyer distributed at the No Kings protest in Ann Arbor, Michigan, called for dismantling U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Supreme Court, and other institutions. It warned of “disorder without parallel” if demands were not met.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Protesters at the No Kings event, the Inter-Cooperative Council (ICC), and community activists.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Ann Arbor, Michigan, during the No Kings protest; training sessions are advertised to take place at the ICC Education Center.

💬KEY QUOTE: “In no uncertain terms, the following conditions must be met, or hostilities will continue, and they will escalate,” the activists warned.

🎯IMPACT: The flyers’ extreme demands and threats of escalation raise concerns about the potential for unrest and the implications for public safety.

IN FULL

Flyers distributed during a No Kings protest in Ann Arbor, Michigan, called for escalating unrest if extreme demands to abolish the Supreme Court and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are not met. The document began with a threatening declaration: “Everything comes to a head. We draw up the terms. We arrange the time and the date. Your people. And our people. We have demands. In no uncertain terms, the following conditions must be met, or hostilities will continue, and they will escalate.” It concluded with a stark warning that if the demands are ignored, “disorder will be without parallel in modern times.”

The flyers called on millions to “rise up, block the streets, take over research centers, and raise the banner of FREE HEALTHCARE and MEDICAL AUTONOMY for everyone on U.S. soil,” presumably including illegal aliens. It also promoted resistance against federal law enforcement agencies, including ICE, Border Patrol, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and local police. Participants were urged to “destroy their infrastructure, discredit their operations, and overwhelm their personnel.”

Also targeting the nation’s judiciary, the flyer demanded that “angry mobs storm the Supreme Court, ABOLISHING IT outright,” and advocated for the replacement of centralized government authority with hyper-local leadership by “community elders, wayward youngsters, and those who earn trust in their communities continuously because of their care and humility, not appointed authority.”

In addition, the document also promoted a local organizing session, advertising a “Neighborhood anti-ICE Training” at the ICC Education Center in Ann Arbor. The center, operated by the Inter-Cooperative Council, is described as a student-led nonprofit promoting “safe spaces and inclusive communities.”

The protest’s messaging, especially the tone and scope of its demands, reflects increasingly militant rhetoric among leftist groups. Recent reports have highlighted a rising willingness among left-wing activists to embrace violence as a political tactic.

According to data and law enforcement assessments, federal agencies have begun tracking Antifa-related groups more closely, including under domestic terrorism protocols. In one case, Antifa-affiliated individuals were charged as terrorists following a sniper attack on an ICE facility.

On Monday, The National Pulse reported that a long-running Antifa website shut down, citing fears of increased federal scrutiny under the Trump administration.

Photo by Tim Sheerman-Chase.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Vance Pledges No U.S. Troops to be Deployed in Gaza During Israel Visit.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Vice President J.D. Vance reaffirmed that no American troops would be deployed to Gaza as Hamas tests the ceasefire agreement with Israel.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Vice President J.D. Vance, President Donald J. Trump, Israeli leaders, and Hamas.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Tuesday, October 21, in southern Israel.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There are not going to be American boots on the ground in Gaza. The President of the United States has made that very clear.” – J.D. Vance

🎯IMPACT: The United States continues to act as a mediator in the region while avoiding direct military involvement in Gaza.

IN FULL

Vice President J.D. Vance on Tuesday reiterated that the United States will not deploy troops to Gaza, even as skirmishes test the limits of the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas.

Speaking during a visit to southern Israel, Vance emphasized the U.S. commitment to diplomacy rather than military involvement. “I think it’s important for Americans to know a couple of things. Number one: there are not going to be American boots on the ground in Gaza,” he said during a press conference, adding: “The President of the United States has made that very clear. All of our military leadership has made that very clear.”

Vance also highlighted the United States’ ongoing role as the lead mediator in the region, working with key players such as Egypt, Turkey, the Gulf Arab states, and Israel. “The only real mediators are the United States of America. That’s the role that we’re going to play [that] I think the American people should be proud of,” he said.

The visit comes amid reports of limited clashes in Gaza following the ceasefire brokered by President Donald J. Trump earlier this month. According to the agreement, Israeli forces began withdrawing from key areas in Gaza, including Gaza City and Khan Younis, as part of the first phase of the deal. Despite weekend flare-ups, both Trump and Israeli officials confirmed that the ceasefire remains in place.

President Trump addressed the situation last week with a warning to Hamas, stating that continued violence would result in harsh retaliation. “We will have no choice but to go in and kill them,” Trump said. He later clarified that U.S. forces would not take part in any ground operations. “It’s not going to be us. We won’t have to. There are people very close, very nearby that will go in. They’ll do the trick very easily, but under our auspices,” he said.

Inside Gaza, Hamas is reportedly facing internal pressure and unrest, including accusations of executing suspected collaborators with Israel. Vance warned the group that failure to uphold the terms of the deal would have consequences. “We know that Hamas has to comply with the deal, and if Hamas doesn’t comply with the deal, very bad things are going to happen,” he said.

Vance also noted growing frustration among Arab nations toward Hamas, as the U.S. works with regional partners to recover the bodies of deceased hostages and begin reconstruction efforts in Gaza.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

White House Says ‘Zero Truth’ to Report That Trump Plans to Grant Diddy Clemency.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The White House has denied a TMZ report claiming President Donald J. Trump may release Sean “Diddy” Combs from prison later this week.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, Sean “Diddy” Combs, and TMZ.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The report surfaced Monday, and the White House responded Tuesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “There is zero truth to the TMZ report, which we would’ve gladly explained had they reached out before running their fake news.” – White House statement.

🎯IMPACT: The White House reiterated that the President is the sole authority on pardons and commutations, dismissing the TMZ report as false.

IN FULL

The White House is denying reports that President Donald J. Trump is considering commuting rapper and music producer Sean “Diddy” Combs’s prison sentence, calling the initial story published by the entertainment tabloid website, TMZ, a fabrication. “There is zero truth to the TMZ report, which we would’ve gladly explained had they reached out before running their fake news,” a White House official said in a statement issued on Tuesday.

“The President, not anonymous sources, is the final decider on pardons and commutations,” they added.

On Monday, TMZ—an entertainment industry tabloid owned by the Fox Corporation—published a story claiming to cite an anonymous high-ranking White House official who suggested Trump might commute Diddy’s sentence as early as this week. The story sparked a corporate press frenzy intended to fuel a public backlash against President Trump over the possible grant of clemency for Combs, who is currently serving a four-year and two-month prison sentence for two counts of transporting women for prostitution.

Notably, Combs has not yet filed a formal request for clemency with the Department of Justice (DOJ), though his attorneys have indicated they are considering it as a possible option.

When asked about pardons on October 6, President Trump said, “I have a lot of people who have asked me for pardons,” and mentioned, “I call him Puff Daddy has asked me.” Diddy has been a vocal critic of Trump, stating during the 2020 election, “White men like Trump need to be banished… We are in a war of love versus hate. The number one priority is to get Trump out of office.”

Photo by Nikeush.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Trump Admin Set to Break Deportation Record in First Year: ‘Just the Beginning.’

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Over 515,000 illegal aliens have been deported since President Donald J. Trump returned to the White House in January, with the administration on track to break deportation records.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Department of Homeland Security Secretary (DHS) Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Border Czar Tom Homan, and U.S. Immigration Enforcement (ICE) officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Since January 20, across the United States.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is just the beginning,” said DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, adding, “Our agency was vilified and barred from doing its job for the last four years.”

🎯IMPACT: The administration has seen a significant reduction in illegal migration, with a 99.99 percent drop in crossings through Panama’s Darien Gap.

IN FULL

Since returning to the White House on January 20, 2025, President Donald J. Trump’s administration has ramped up immigration enforcement, resulting in over 515,000 deportations, according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the administration is on track to reach 600,000 deportations by the end of the year, which would set a new record.

McLaughlin also revealed that more than two million illegal immigrants have left the United States since Trump took office, including 1.6 million who self-deported. Approximately 485,000 people have been arrested for immigration violations. “This is just the beginning,” McLaughlin said, crediting President Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for restoring the agency’s ability to enforce immigration laws after what she described as years of restrictions. “Our agency was vilified and barred from doing its job for the last four years,” she added.

The administration’s efforts have extended beyond arrests and deportations. McLaughlin pointed to a significant decrease in illegal crossings along key migration routes, including a reported 99.99 percent drop in migration through the Darien Gap in Panama, a critical path for migrants headed to the United States. She said this is largely due to new policies and strong messaging that discourage would-be migrants from attempting to cross into the U.S. illegally.

Recent figures also show a sharp decline in the foreign-born population in the U.S., which has dropped by 2.2 million since January. This shift is attributed to a combination of increased deportations, tougher border enforcement, and a drop in illegal border crossings.

To support the expanded operations, the Trump administration opened a new deportation center at Angola Prison in Louisiana, a facility known for its high-security measures. This move is aimed at speeding up processing and removals of illegals, especially those with criminal convictions.

Over the weekend, DHS officials reported the arrest of several illegal immigrants with criminal records, including aliens convicted of child rape, kidnapping, assault, and drug trafficking. Arrests took place in multiple states, including Massachusetts, Alabama, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Wisconsin.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

UK Govt Faces Renewed Rape Gangs Backlash as Victims Resign from Official Investigation.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Members of the victims’ panel are resigning from the British government’s official inquiry into the Muslim grooming gangs scandal, citing conflicts of interest among proposed inquiry leaders.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Victims Fiona Goddard, Ellie-Ann Reynolds, and a third survivor using the pseudonym Elizabeth, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, and other government officials.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Resignations occurred on October 20 and October 21, the inquiry is to take place in the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is a disturbing conflict of interest, and I fear the lack of trust in services from years of failings and corruption will have a negative impact in survivor engagement with this inquiry,” Fiona Goddard said of former police and social work leaders being considered to lead the inquiry, despite their institutions being heavily implicated in the grooming gangs cover-up.

🎯IMPACT: Accusations of government sabotage of the inquiry are threatening its credibility and undermining the public trust.

IN FULL

Britain’s official inquiry into Muslim grooming gangs abuse and the authorities failure to properly investigate it is under growing pressure after three survivors resigned from its victims’ panel, raising concerns about conflicts of interest, transparency, and a potential watering down of the investigation’s focus.

Fiona Goddard, a survivor of grooming gang abuse, stepped down on Monday after discovering that a former police officer and a social worker, representing institutions heavily involved in covering up the abuse, were being considered to lead the inquiry. “This is a disturbing conflict of interest, and I fear the lack of trust in services from years of failings and corruption will have a negative impact in survivor engagement with this inquiry,” she wrote in her resignation letter. Goddard argued that the inquiry should meet or exceed the standards of a criminal trial, where such conflicts would be disqualifying.

Ellie-Ann Reynolds, another survivor, also resigned, accusing the government of limiting the voices of victims. “You isolated us by discouraging contact with each other and with our support networks. You dictated what we could say publicly, edited our words, and made it clear that speaking openly would jeopardise our place on the panel,” she said.

A third survivor resigned on Tuesday, writing in a statement posted to X, “What is happening now feels like a cover-up of a cover-up. It has created a toxic environment for survivors, filled with pressures that we should not have to deal with.”

The inquiry, originally designed to focus on the grooming and abuse of predominantly white working-class girls by mostly Pakistani Muslim men, has been criticised for broadening its scope to include other forms of child sexual exploitation. Goddard warned that this shift risks weakening the inquiry’s impact. “Expanding the scope of this inquiry risks it being watered down and once again, failing to get to the truth,” she stated.

The British police watchdog admitted in September that senior officers in South Yorkshire failed to act on evidence of grooming gang activity, allowing abuse to continue unchecked. Earlier this year, an official review found that investigators often deliberately ignored or failed to record the ethnicity of offenders, making it harder to detect or prove demographic patterns of abuse.

More recently, London Mayor Sadiq Khan has faced accusations of covering up data related to Muslim grooming gangs, with critics alleging political concerns over so-called community relations influenced the lack of transparency. This was the case in other grooming gang hotspots, with police afraid they would be accused of racism if they went after Pakistani Muslims targeting white girls, or that public knowledge of the crimes would encourage racism.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Democrat Congresswoman Seeks Dismissal of Charges for Assaulting ICE Agents.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) is seeking to have assault charges against her dismissed in court.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Rep. LaMonica McIver, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The alleged assault occurred in May 2025, outside the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey, with a trial set for November 2025.

🎯IMPACT: McIver faces up to 17 years in prison if convicted, with a trial scheduled for next month.

IN FULL

Representative LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) is expected to file a motion in federal court today asking that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecution against her be dismissed. The New Jersey Democrat was charged with assault in June for forcibly impeding federal officers during the attempted arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D).

In May, McIver and Baraka clashed with federal agents while demanding to enter the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)’s Delaney Hall detention facility in Newark. Baraka was arrested for trespassing after he entered a secured area of the facility and refused to leave when asked by federal agents.

McIver is accused of three counts of assaulting or impeding federal agents for her actions during the May incident, with her trial set to begin next month. If convicted, she could face up to 17 years in prison.

The new motion will likely echo prior filings by McIver’s attorneys, contending that the case should be thrown out on grounds of selective and vindictive prosecution by the Trump administration. Notably, her attorneys have already filed a separate motion to dismiss on the grounds of  “legislative immunity.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Colombia’s Marxist Leader Says He Wants to ‘Get Rid Of’ Trump.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro suggested “getting rid of” President Donald J. Trump in an interview on Monday evening.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Colombian President Gustavo Petro and President Donald J. Trump.

📍WHEN & WHERE: October 20, 2025, during an interview with Univision.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If not—get rid of Trump,” Petro said, snapping his fingers.

🎯IMPACT: The remarks mark a significant escalation in the Marxist leader’s feud with Trump over his use of military airstrikes to stop cartel drug smuggling operations in the Caribbean.

IN FULL

Colombian President Gustavo Petro is escalating his feud with U.S. President Donald. J. Trump, suggesting in an interview on Monday night with the Spanish-language network Univision that “getting rid of” Trump may be necessary. “Humanity has a first offramp, it is to choose to change Trump in various ways,” Petro said, adding: “The easiest way may be through Trump himself. If not—get rid of Trump,” snapping his fingers for emphasis.

While the Marxist Colombian leader acknowledged his country has struggled to rein in violent drug cartels and end government corruption, Petro insisted only Colombians can determine their country’s future, stating: “Trump said: ‘Colombia is out of control.’ Of course, it is out of his control. In a democracy, a government is under the control of the people, not Trump. He is not a king in Colombia; we do not accept kings here, period.”

“In the 21st century, some believe they can become kings and viceroys, but in republics, it is not possible,” Petro continued, before threatening: “Here, the heads of kings are cut off if they come with a king’s attitude.”


The National Pulse reported on Monday that Trump doubled down on his criticism of Colombia, calling Petro a “lunatic” and the “worst president they’ve ever had.” The America First leader has vowed to halt all payments to the Latin American country over its cocaine production and renewed support of neighboring Venezuela’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro.

Since September, the U.S. military has been conducting airstrikes targeting Venezuelan drug boats in the Caribbean as part of a larger effort to eliminate criminal drug cartels across Latin America. In early October, President Trump formally notified Congress that the United States is now engaged in an official “armed conflict” with the South and Central American cartels.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Thousands of Potential Noncitizens Found on Texas Voter Rolls.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Texas Secretary of State’s office identified 2,724 people on voter rolls who may not be U.S. citizens, following a cross-check with the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson and county election officials, utilizing data from the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) SAVE program.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Texas, with a press release issued on Monday, covering all 254 counties in the state.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We appreciate the partnership with the federal government to verify the citizenship of those on our voter rolls and maintain accurate voter lists.” – Jane Nelson

🎯IMPACT: County election officials will notify flagged voters, with a 30-day period to verify citizenship before potential removal from voter rolls.

IN FULL

The office of Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson has pinpointed 2,724 possible noncitizens listed on the state’s voter registration database, following a cross-check with the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system. This initiative, supported by the Trump administration’s broadened access to federal records, represents a key advancement in ensuring accurate voter rolls.

Secretary of State Jane Nelson remarked: “We appreciate the partnership with the federal government to verify the citizenship of those on our voter rolls and maintain accurate voter lists.” The process involved scrutinizing 18 million voter records against SAVE’s citizenship information, highlighting cases for additional checks. These potential cases are distributed throughout Texas counties, with the highest concentrations in Harris (362), Dallas (277), Bexar (201), and El Paso (165).

Local county election authorities are now alerting those flagged and offering a 30-day period to confirm their citizenship. Voters who fail to submit evidence could see their registrations suspended temporarily, with the option for restoration once eligibility is validated. Federal election laws bar noncitizens from casting votes.

A Department of Homeland Security representative commented, “Illegal aliens have exploited outdated systems to defraud Americans and taint our elections. This revamped SAVE system will ensure government officials can swiftly verify legal status, halting entitlements and voter fraud.”

The examination encompassed all 254 Texas counties, assigning election officials the duty of in-depth probes to guarantee that only qualified voters stay listed. Secretary Nelson stressed, “Everyone’s right to vote is sacred and must be protected. The SAVE database has proven to be a critically important data set and one of many that we will continue to use in Texas to ensure that only qualified voters cast a ballot in our elections.”

Image by Lorie Shaull.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Socialized UK Health Service Determined Southport Killer Was Not Dangerous Days Before Stabbing Spree.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An official inquiry into the stabbing spree targeting young girls in Southport, England, by Axel Rudakubana has found that he was assessed as posing no risk to others in a mental health evaluation by Britain’s socialized National Health Service (NHS) just six days before his attack.

WHO WAS INVOLVED: Axel Rudakubana, Alder Hey Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) case manager Kathryn Morris, clinical lead Dr. Vicky Killen, psychiatrists Dr. Lakshmi Ramasubramanian and Dr. Anthony Molyneux, counsel Nicholas Moss KC, and Rudakubana’s victims.

WHEN & WHERE: Risk assessment and discharge on July 23, 2024, at Alder Hey CAMHS; attack on July 29, 2024, in Southport; inquiry testimony on October 20, 2025, at Liverpool Town Hall.

KEY QUOTE: “There would appear to be repeated occurrences of the family appearing to, shall we say, stage manage the presentation of information provided to professionals.” – Dr Anthony Molyneux.

IMPACT: Revelations expose critical lapses in mental health oversight and information sharing, fueling calls for systemic reforms in child services to prevent future tragedies amid Rudakubana’s history of violence and manipulation.

IN FULL

A public inquiry has revealed serious failings by Britain’s socialized National Health Service (NHS) just days before Axel Rudakubana, carried out a deadly knife attack that killed three young girls and injured several others in Southport, England. The then-17-year-old was discharged by Alder Hey Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) on July 23, 2024, following a risk assessment that incorrectly concluded he posed no threat to others. This decision was made despite records noting incidents of aggression, including verbal threats toward his father—an African asylum seeker—and smashing a phone during a call.

Only six days later, on July 29, Rudakubana stormed a Taylor Swift-themed dance workshop and fatally stabbed three girls: seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe, six-year-old Bebe King, and nine-year-old Alice da Silva Aguiar. He also attempted to kill ten other children and wounded two adults. The attack shocked the nation and led to widespread anti-mass migration demonstrations and riots, which prompted a draconian crackdown by the British authorities.

At Monday’s hearing at Liverpool Town Hall, Nicholas Moss KC confronted CAMHS clinical lead Dr Vicky Killen, who admitted the determination that Rudakubana was not dangerous was unacceptable. “There was risk on the record and it should have been recorded,” she said, conceding the assessment fell “very far” short of expected standards.

Other medical professionals also raised concerns about Rudakubana’s history. Psychiatrist Dr Lakshmi Ramasubramanian recounted a troubling phone consultation in 2021, where she said Rudakubana described symptoms “as if he had rehearsed it from a book” to obtain medication. She described his behaviour as “demanding, argumentative,” and said he tried to “manipulate” the situation. She eventually stopped treatment after his migrant father acted in an “intimidating” and “disrespectful” manner, something she said had never happened in her career.

Dr Anthony Molyneux, who began treating Rudakubana in July 2022, assessed him as a “minimal” risk. He knew of a school knife incident but was unaware of more serious events, including a 2019 assault on a pupil with a hockey stick and online searches for terrorism-related content. Molyneux said full record reviews were “impossible” saying, “There would appear to be repeated occurrences of the family appearing to, shall we say, stage manage the presentation of information provided to professionals.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more