The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has completed a six-week audit of Boeing’s manufacturing of the 737 Max following an incident in which a door panel was torn from a 737 Max 9 on an Alaska Airlines flight early this year. The audit found numerous instances of noncompliance at Boeing and its key supplier, Spirit AeroSystems.
The FAA spotlighted “multiple instances” where Boeing and Spirit AeroSystems failed to meet quality control requirements. However, the agency has not disclosed the specifics of these supposed lapses.
The FAA failed Boeing on 33 of 89 product audits, recording 97 instances of noncompliance. Spirit AeroSystems, responsible for constructing the 737 Max’s fuselage, underwent 13 product audits, failing seven.
On one occasion, auditors saw Spirit AeroSystems mechanics testing a door seal with a hotel card key, which they noted was “not identified/documented/called-out in the production order.”
The FAA may have contributed to an apparent decline in standards in the aviation industry itself, however, pushing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) hiring policies, which even encompass people with “psychiatric disability” and “severe intellectual disability.”
In addition to the Alaska Airlines door incident, Boeing jets have experienced multiple issues in just the last week, including an aircraft driving off a runway, an aircraft losing a tire, and an aircraft injuring 50 passengers after hurling them into its ceiling during a “technical event.”
show less
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has completed a six-week audit of Boeing’s manufacturing of the 737 Max following an incident in which a door panel was torn from a 737 Max 9 on an Alaska Airlines flight early this year. The audit found numerous instances of noncompliance at Boeing and its key supplier, Spirit AeroSystems.
show more
Top U.S. government epidemiologist Dr. Matthew Memoli warned Dr. Anthony Fauci about the potential negative consequences of mandating COVID-19 vaccinations, an unearthed email from 2021 has revealed.
“Coercing or forcing people to take a vaccine can have negative consequences from a biological, sociological, psychological, economical, and ethical standpoint and is not worth the cost even if the vaccine is 100% safe,” Memoli, director of the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases clinical studies unit at the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), wrote to Fauci and others.
Upon urging mass vaccinations, Fauci claimed a significant increase in vaccinated communities would lead to a safer environment. Memoli, who has spent years researching influenza vaccinations, expressed reservations.
“At best what we are doing with mandated mass vaccination does nothing and the variants emerge evading immunity anyway as they would have without the vaccine,” Memoli wrote. “At worst it drives evolution of the virus in a way that is different from nature and possibly detrimental, prolonging the pandemic or causing more morbidity and mortality than it should.”
Memoli also raised concerns regarding the bioethical aspects of the mandates, referring to issues such as the vaccines’ diminished protection over time, potential severe health risks, and the undifferentiated spread rate between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. During a debate at an NIH event, Memoli acknowledged the necessity of vaccine mandates but questioned their justification in the case of COVID-19 vaccines, given their transitory effectiveness.
A number of recent studies have proved that the COVID-19 vaccines caused several serious medical side effects, some of which are lethal.
show less
Top U.S. government epidemiologist Dr. Matthew Memoli warned Dr. Anthony Fauci about the potential negative consequences of mandating COVID-19 vaccinations, an unearthed email from 2021 has revealed.
show more
Lara Trump, newly elected Co-Chair of the Republican National Committee (RNC), is advocating for “legal ballot harvesting” as a necessary competitive strategy against Democrats in the upcoming 2024 election.
“We’ve been playing checkers, and the Democrats have been playing chess,” she stated in a recent interview, citing gaps in GOP strategy that Democrats have effectively used to their advantage, such as early voting and mail-in voting. Lara Trump, former President Donald Trump’s daughter-in-law, emphasized the importance of the GOP taking control of the voting narrative to avoid last-minute election-day catch-up. The strategic use of “legal ballot harvesting” was earmarked as essential to future RNC plans.
Additional calls for well-trained poll watchers and lawyers stationed at various locations to physically count incoming and outgoing ballots were also part of her proposed strategy. She underscored her intent to restore voter trust in the electoral process and ensure donor contributions are effectively utilized toward GOP victory.
The shift in focus for the RNC follows the recent election of Michael Whatley and Trump as national co-chairs of the Republican party, positions filled through the guidance of former President Donald Trump. Trump and Whatley — the former North Carolina GOP chairman — replaced outgoing RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel. In addition to Lara Trump and Whatley, the RNC’s executive direction will be led by Chris LaCivita, a chief advisor for the Trump campaign.
show less
Lara Trump, newly elected Co-Chair of the Republican National Committee (RNC), is advocating for “legal ballot harvesting” as a necessary competitive strategy against Democrats in the upcoming 2024 election.
show more
President Joe Biden delivered a long and rambling response when pressed by Department of Justice special counsel Robert Hur regarding document retention during the final days of the Obama government. The 81-year-old Biden, ignoring Hur’s question, went on a nearly 10-minute rant discussing country clubs, interview practices of almost 60 years ago, and how a man he knew lost his genitals in a fire.
Hur asked Biden: “So now let’s talk about the Naval Observatory. So you’ve been living there for eight years. So at the end of your vice presidency, what kinds of papers or documents or files were at the Naval Observatory as you were preparing to leave and move out?”
The President began to respond substantively but quickly spiraled into a bizarre and unhinged tangent comparable to the iconic Simpsons scene where Homer Simpson’s father indulges himself in a winding story that ends up nowhere.
Read it for yourself:
PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well, if you’re talking about anything that was a substantive matter, classified or otherwise — you know, the fight in the Judiciary Committee over whether or not — I was the guy who wrote the Violence Against Women Act. It was — really meant a lot to me. And so they might find stuff on the Violence Against Women Act in one section of a drawer or in the shelves of the library or of the Naval Observatory.
Or issues, you know, relating to — I know it’s gonna sound strange to you guys, but agriculture is a $4 billion industry, agriculture is a $4 billion industry in Delaware and the Delmarva peninsula, and so — or, you know, I’d have a lot of political things that — I, I don’t know where they were, but I know I had material that — where I, you know — like, there’s a whole, whole bunch of stuff around about how -~ what made me run for President in the first place, and about how things were — you know, I mean, for example, I, I was a — I got a job with a — I didn’t take law school very seriously, but I won the International Tort Competition. I was in — matter of fact, the first time in tort class, we had a really difficult professor. I mean, very well-known, Professor at Syracuse, and he called on me to — you know how they do in law school, discuss a case, you know, in your first torts class. And I had never read the case, and I stood up and I spoke for 10 minutes. The whole class stood up, started clapping.
The transcript notes there was laughter among those in the interview at this point.
PRESIDENT BIDEN: And he said, Mr. Biden, you’ll be a hell of a trial lawyer. He said, not a single thing you — had to do with that.
Again, the transcript denotes laughter.
PRESIDENT BIDEN: And — but at any rate, so — but in law school, I got in law school, and I got, believe it or not, a job offer from some prestigious law firms. I was not sure where I wanted to go, out west and where — I wanted to move to Idaho, I thought, and so I was going to go out and interview with Boise Cascade. That’s all I’d really — and — but I took a job with the best-known trial firm in Delaware in mostly civil defense issues. And, and so — and I remember a guy named [REDACTED] (phonetic), a brilliant guy that went to Amherst and Harvard and said — when he was interviewing me said, in those days, you had to — today you would be killed. You had to put your photograph in the upper right-hand corner when you’re applying for a job. And he looked at me and said, I assume you’re expecting to be hired on your looks.
Once again, the transcript denotes laughter.
PRESIDENT BIDEN: And I said — and I thought the job was over, and I said, I said, well, it would improve the look of your firm.
Those present respond with laughter again, according to the transcript.
PRESIDENT BIDEN: I mean, I was just — So anyway, to make a long story short, they ended up offering me a job. And in Delaware, it has -~- used to have the lowest pass rate in the country because we’re not big on encouraging lawyers to come and play in Delaware. It’s a very tight bar. And, and so what happened was you take the bar, you graduate, and you have to clerk for somebody for six months. (Indiscernible 0:11:51.6). And they don’t give the bar exam until the middle of September. You don’t get your results to your — for the bar exam until January. And, and so — I — but I got hired in the meantime by this firm appropriately named Prickett, Ward, Burt Sanders. And, and to make a long story not quite so long, I was sitting second chair with the, with the, with the guy who ran the firm, Prickett, Mr. Prickett, and there was a young man who we were representing, [REDACTED] (phonetic) getting — and (indiscernible 0:12:34.3) construction company, you know, I had to turn those — we have more oil refineries than any place other than in Houston in Delaware and Pennsylvania, (indiscernible 0:12:43.6) up in that area.
And this poor kid is down a hundred-foot vessel, chimney, scraping the hydrogen bubbles off of the inside. They were made to shut the plant down once every — whatever, about eight months or six months or a year, whatever it is. And he was wearing the wrong pants, wrong jeans, and he -~- a spark caught fire and got caught in the containment vessel and he lost part of his penis and one of his testicles and he was 23 years old.
And I sat through the -~ his presentation with the, with the senior, and we had in Delaware, which is – the Dupont family had no influence of course – contributory negligence. If you were slightly contributory negligence, you were out.
And so the senior partner turned to me and said, write a memo for tomorrow, we’re going to make a motion to dismiss after presenting this case. So I did. I wrote this memo. And son of a bitch, it prevailed. And I looked over at that kid and his wife home with two little kids, and I thought son of a bitch, I’m in the wrong business, I’m not made for this.
It is at this point that Biden transitions to discussing the admission practices of private country clubs in Delaware, before explaining his decision to become a public defender.
PRESIDENT BIDEN: And I — there was a famous club called the Wilmington Club — no blacks, Catholics are allowed — have been allowed to be members. The DuPont family name. And we went to a place called the Wilmington Club, and he thought he was doing — he said, take the lunch at Wilmington. I said — the only time I ever lied that I can remember looking somebody in the eye, and I mean sincerely, I said, oh, my dad’s coming in today, I was going to see -~ okay. He didn’t give a damn where I went. I walked across and walked through to the second — the basement on a public building and walked in with a guy named Frank and I said I want a job as a public defender. He said, don’t you work for Prickett. He said, he said, are you okay, like what the hell’s the matter with you. I quit and became a public defender.
The process of that was that’s what got me — I had been involved in the civil rights movement. That got me deeply involved in trying to reform the Democratic Party, which was a southern Democratic Party. We were a slave state by law. We were one of the border states so we couldn’t figure — anyway, but the Democratic Party was a conservative party in Delaware. The DuPont family ran the Republican Party, but they were like Rockefeller Republicans at the time. And so I got involved with a group of people trying to reform the Democratic Party.
At this point Biden informed Hur his story was meant to illustrate the amount of materials he has kept over the years.
PRESIDENT BIDEN: And the whole point of telling you all this is I had a lot of material that I kept notes on and, and when that — where as I was taking on the Democratic Party. And they came to me and asked me to — this group, this new Democratic coalition — I had, in the meantime, it’s two years down the road, I was 26 years old, 27. And I went to work part time for a criminal defense firm mainly, a real estate — there were five people. And so I was no longer a public defender because I couldn’t be a public defender and work for that firm.
President Biden’s moment of clarity does not last however, and he again plunges into a lengthy rant — several times to “make a long story short.”
PRESIDENT BIDEN: And one thing led to another and I joined this group to try to reform the party. And they came to me about and I was making the case we’ve just got to get more candidates to run, to — we’re not, we’re not represented. And the southern part of the state of Delaware will talk at you like this, for real, you go down — you think I’m joking, I’m not joking. “Damn, boy, I don’t agree with a damn thing you say,” but he said, “I know where you stand, know where you stand.” That’s how they talk. And it was solidly democrat, southern democrat. We were the only state in the nation occupied by the military for 10 months with drawn bayonets at every corner when Dr. King was assassinated, and that’s really what got me going. Long story, and I’ll end, because it relates to maybe some of the other things you may ask about, is that I had a lot of material that I did recent. When you’re the youngest guy in the room, you get to turn the lights on and off. And so I, I amassed a lot of material making the case why the party had to change and, and they — and it ended up that about 10 months in, the group from the area where I lived came to me and said they wanted me to run for the state senate. I said, no, no, no, I can’t do that. I just — I’m thinking of starting my own law firm and it’s going to — no, I can’t do that. And because they meet in Dover and dah, dah, dah.
And then next thing that happened was I came back about three weeks later. They said we want — to the office I was in at the time. I had now started my own office. And I didn’t realize no one my age ever started his own law firm. I hired two lawyers. I had no freaking money. But I hired them and paid them more than I was going to make, and I started this firm. And there — I remember standing looking out over the public and they said how about running for the county council. I said, no, no, I can’t go down. He said, they meet right across the street there only twice a week at night. You can do this. So to make a long story short, I ended up doing it. But I wanted to be sure that I was going to lose because — so I ran ina district that no one’s ever won, a Democrat had never won.
And I won it.
And next thing you know, I’m in a tough position.
My generic point was there was a lot of material that I had amassed that I wanted to save. I probably still have it somewhere. And so that stuff would travel wherever the hell
I was —
Hur, at this point, finally interrupts Biden. The special counsel steered the conversation back to the relevant question of document retention.
“Do you recall having these types of things with you at the Naval Observatory and this was part of the stuff you were trying to move out?” Hur asked the President.
“No. I had most of it at my house in that office,” Biden finally answered.
show less
President Joe Biden delivered a long and rambling response when pressed by Department of Justice special counsel Robert Hur regarding document retention during the final days of the Obama government. The 81-year-old Biden, ignoring Hur’s question, went on a nearly 10-minute rant discussing country clubs, interview practices of almost 60 years ago, and how a man he knew lost his genitals in a fire.
show more
Transcripts of special counsel Robert Hur’s interviews with Joe Biden regarding the mishandling of classified documents reveal that the aging Biden couldn’t remember the name for a fax machine.
Biden’s troublingly poor memory was evident after Hur asked him about bringing classified documents to his Wilmington, Delaware, lake house.
After telling Hur that he “occasionally” brought classified information to the house because he “did business there,” Biden offered a description of the library at the property from where he worked: “I have a library, and the library has a — two filing cabinets in it, and it has built into the walls — when I built that home, built into the walls, a space for a copy machine, for a — what do you call it, when they send these –”
“Fax machine,” Ed Siskel, Biden’s counsel, chimed in. “Fax machine,” Biden repeated.
Biden’s inability to recall the name of a piece of equipment he would have spent three decades using regularly — modern fax machines were invented in the mid-1970s and became obsolete in the late 1990s — is sure to add to concerns about the 81-year-old’s mental faculties.
Hur’s initial report on his investigation of Biden’s mishandling of classified documents described the President as an “elderly man with poor memory.” In addition to raising more questions about Biden’s mental state, the full transcripts of Hur’s interviews, released Tuesday, also prove that Biden lied about forgetting when his son Beau died.
show less
Transcripts of special counsel Robert Hur’s interviews with Joe Biden regarding the mishandling of classified documents reveal that the aging Biden couldn’t remember the name for a fax machine.
show more
President Joe Biden brought up his son Beau Biden’s death just seven minutes into his interview with Department of Justice (DOJ) Special Counsel Robert Hur, according to the transcript of the five-hour meeting. After the special counsel’s report was released in February, the President lashed out at Hur — leading the American people to believe it was the special counsel who first broached the subject of Beau’s death.
The DOJ special counsel had been probing Biden on his activities at the end of his then-Vice Presidency and his decision to locate the Biden Cancer Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania. Biden was also asked about his decision to write a book in the last days of the Obama government, with the President explaining he wanted to “write a book about my son because he was a remarkable man” so that his family would “understand who he was and have some documentation of it.”
This directly contradicts Biden’s assertion at his February address on Hur’s report in which he insisted it was the special counsel who first broached the subject of his son’s death. “How in the hell dare he raise that,” Biden growled at the time, adding: “Frankly when I was asked the question, I thought to myself, it wasn’t any of their damn business.”
The President had claimed it was Hur who had directly asked the date of his son’s death. However, the interview transcript shows that Biden himself broached that subject as well. Hur noted in his report that Biden had become confused and could not remember the actual date or year in which Beau Biden had died of cancer.
show less
President Joe Biden brought up his son Beau Biden’s death just seven minutes into his interview with Department of Justice (DOJ) Special Counsel Robert Hur, according to the transcript of the five-hour meeting. After the special counsel’s report was released in February, the President lashed out at Hur — leading the American people to believe it was the special counsel who first broached the subject of Beau’s death.
show more
The transcript of Joe Biden’s October 2023interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur reveals he boasted about the “real advantage” he gained after taking a job at the University of Pennsylvania’s Penn Biden Center, which has been funded by a vast number of Chinese donors.
“[T]he real advantage I had in the Penn job was they gave me money to hire staff,” Biden told Hur, emphasizing that this Penn money even funded a salary for the “first-rate” Antony Blinken, who is now his Secretary of State.
Biden added that his focus at the Penn Biden Center was “mainly to on foreign policy [sic].” This admission is likely to raise alarm bells in some quarters, as donations to the University of Pennsylvania from China increased over threefold after it began publicizing the Penn Biden Center in February 2017.
Of $61 million donated to the university by Chinese individuals and entities from 2017 to 2020, around $22 million was sourced anonymously, raising further concerns about potential influence peddling.
The House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Accountability has stressed that “[n]ot only were these donations made while President Biden explored a potential run for president and launched his campaign, but also as his family and associates pursued lucrative financial projects with partners in China.”
“The American people deserve to know whether the Chinese Communist Party, through Chinese companies, influenced potential Biden Administration policies with large, anonymous donations to UPenn and the Penn Biden Center,” the Committee wrote in 2023.
Jack Montgomery contributed to this report.
show less
The transcript of Joe Biden’s October 2023 interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur reveals he boasted about the “real advantage” he gained after taking a job at the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Biden Center, which has been funded by a vast number of Chinese donors.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
A court in Pakistan, has sentenced a 22-year-old student to death and a 17-year-old to life in prison for allegedly insulting Mohammed, the Islamic prophet, in WhatsApp messages.
Aslam Gujar, a lawyer who represented 22-year-old Junaid Munir, says the judge in Punjab province city imposed the death penalty on his client for blasphemy last week. Seventeen-year-old Abdul Hanan was convicted and sentenced to life in a separate case at the same court.
Munir’s father, Munir Hussain, insists his “son is innocent and he was implicated in a false case.” He is attempting to organize an appeal from hiding, “as some people in our village believe that I should also be killed as I am the father of a boy who allegedly insulted Islam’s prophet.”
“We are Muslims. We love our prophet. No Muslim can even imagine to insult our beloved prophet, and my son is innocent,” he pleaded.
Muslims in Pakistan, notionally a Western ally, often take the law into their own hands when blasphemy is suspected, with the Islamic Republic’s small Christian minority often being targeted.
A Christian couple accused of blasphemy was burned alive in an industrial kiln by a mob in 2014, and hundreds of Muslims descended on a Christian settlement and torched or otherwise wrecked dozens of houses, churches, and a cemetery after two of its members were accused of blasphemy in 2023.
show less
A court in Pakistan, has sentenced a 22-year-old student to death and a 17-year-old to life in prison for allegedly insulting Mohammed, the Islamic prophet, in WhatsApp messages.
show more
US corporations are taking advantage of a federal loophole that allows illegal immigrants to acquire jobs when they claim refugee status. The loophole is being used by the non-governmental organization Tent Partnership for Refugees, which is aligned with more than 400 multinational corporations committed to hiring refugees. These corporations range from RedRoof Inn, Royal Farms, and Shopify to Delta Airlines, DoorDash, Etsy, and Bloomberg.
Tent Partnership for Refugees has tremendous influence within the Biden government. In December of 2022, Secretary of State Antony Blinken signed a memorandum with the non-governmental organization aimed at broadening economic opportunities for refugees within the private sector. The move, critics argue, further intertwined the interests of US corporations and progressive open-border advocates.
The State Department policy decision is primarily used to facilitate sourcing cheap immigrant labor for large corporations. Recently, Tyson Foods, Inc. announced it is planning to hire tens of thousands of migrants via Tent Partnership, augmenting its existing 42,000 migrant workforce out of a total of 120,000 in the US.
Garrett Dolan, who spearheads Tyson’s initiative to dismantle employment obstacles such as immigration status, revealed that many new recruits are projected to be refugees and immigrants. “We’re recognizing there’s not a lot of people that are going to be working labor-manufacturing jobs that are American,” Dolan said in a statement announcing the hiring move.
The National Pulse has previously reported that most US job gains under President Joe Biden have been fueled by immigrant labor. At the same time, native-born employment numbers continue to lag behind pre-pandemic levels.
show less
US corporations are taking advantage of a federal loophole that allows illegal immigrants to acquire jobs when they claim refugee status. The loophole is being used by the non-governmental organization Tent Partnership for Refugees, which is aligned with more than 400 multinational corporations committed to hiring refugees. These corporations range from RedRoof Inn, Royal Farms, and Shopify to Delta Airlines, DoorDash, Etsy, and Bloomberg.
show more
Roberta A. Kaplan, the legal counsel for E. Jean Carroll in her defamation case against former President Donald Trump, has hinted at the possibility of another lawsuit.
“The statute of limitations for defamation in most jurisdictions is between one and three years,” Kaplan said in a statement Monday morning. “As we said after the last jury verdict, we continue to monitor every statement that Donald Trump makes about our client.”
Trump, in a CNBC interview on Monday, referred to Carroll’s accusation as “false” and expressed optimism for a victorious appeal. The former president also claimed he was unfamiliar with Carroll until the issuance of a lawsuit. He described his initial reaction to the lawsuit as one of disbelief.
Last week, Trump posted a bond exceeding $90 million in order to appeal the case. Carroll’s accusations, published in a 2019 article, claimed that Trump sexually assaulted her. However, she was unable to provide comprehensive details about the incident and repeatedly changed parts of her story.
In February, another lawyer for Carroll said she was looking to sue Trump for a third time.
show less
Roberta A. Kaplan, the legal counsel for E. Jean Carroll in her defamation case against former President Donald Trump, has hinted at the possibility of another lawsuit.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.