Thursday, June 25, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Jordan Peterson Paper Links ‘Christ is King’ to Extremism with Shoddy Scholarship.

Canadian psychologist and political commentator Dr. Jordan Peterson has co-authored a brief report that claims the Christian phrase “Christ is King” has been hijacked by online extremists. However, the report is full of basic errors.

Thy Name in Vain: How Online Extremists Hijacked ‘Christ is King’ is a 21-page paper authored by Peterson and around a dozen others, and claims that the phrase is being “weaponized” on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter). It alleges that the phrase is being used by “Nazis” and others to promote “hate speech.”

While the report correctly notes Pope Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King in 1925, it incorrectly claims the phrase was only used in liturgy and hymns. In fact, Christians have extensively used the phrase “Viva Cristo Rey” or “Long Live Christ the King.” For instance, it was a rallying cry in Mexico in the 1920s when the secularist government was brutally oppressing Catholics.

The phrase finds its ultimate roots in the Crucifixion itself, with Christ’s executioners having nailed a board reading ‘INRI’—short for Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum, meaning ‘Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews’—to the Cross. Christ is also named “King of kings and Lord of lords” in St. Paul’s epistles and the Book of Revelation.

BASIC ERRORS.

The report highlights comments from social media personalities such as Andrew Tate, despite the fact he is a Muslim. Additionally, the document gets basic facts wrong regarding Catholic Church ecclesiology. For instance, it claims Bishop Joseph Strickland, who has also stated “Christ is King” on social media, is “a former Catholic bishop.” However, while Strickland was removed from the diocese of Tyler, Texas, in 2023, he remains a Roman Catholic bishop in good standing with the Church. The removal was purely an administrative measure and not a laicization or excommunication.

Rev. Johnnie Moore, another author of the report, has been ratioed on X by users after posting a video promoting the report. Nearly all of the comments affirm that “Christ is King” or are deeply critical of Moore.

Political commentator Jack Posobiec, also a target of the report, noted that Moore appears to have connections with various Islamic states, such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), asking, “What is going on here?”

Jack Montgomery and Will Upton contributed to this report.

Image by Lawrence OP.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Half of Illegal Migrants Are Impossible to Deport Due to Asylum and Human Rights Claims.

Leaked documents from the British government reveal significant challenges in deporting illegal migrants due to outstanding human rights and asylum claims, prompting new legislative reforms.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The United Kingdom cannot deport half of the approximately 400,000 illegal migrants known to be in the country due to asylum and human rights claims, according to leaked government documents.
📰 DETAIL: In August 2024, Immigration Enforcement in Britain identified 412,191 migrants with “no status in the UK.” This figure includes foreign workers overstaying their visas, foreign students, and failed asylum seekers. Of these individuals, 201,926 were deemed “not removable” due to pending legal challenges related to asylum and human rights claims. In response to the findings, which were first reported on Thursday, the British Home Office, roughly equivalent to the Department of Homeland Security in the United States, plans to introduce new legislation to streamline the review process. Specifically, the Immigration and Asylum Bill intends to double the budget for Immigration Enforcement and increase the number of officers by 60 percent by 2029. The bill also seeks to limit the use of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights; that is, the right to private and family life, home and correspondence, which has historically been used to prevent the deportation of foreign-born criminals who have established some relationships in Britain. The bill also includes provisions that aim to end abuse of the Modern Slavery Act, specifically, aspects of the law that migrants use to evade deportation by claiming they have been trafficked, as well as introduce a “temporary refugee” status. The proposed bill is scheduled to be voted on next week.
🎯 IMPACT: The recently released figures show how the current human rights and asylum system prevents and delays the deportation of illegal migrants with no legal standing to be in the United Kingdom. It also reveals how the system is exploited to prevent the deportation of individuals who are widely regarded as threats to local communities. The leaked documents are likely to compound pre-existing concerns and public anger towards existing immigration and refugee policies. The proposed bill is controversial with Labour Members of Parliament (MPs), many of whom are happy with mass migration, raising concerns that the Labour MPs could revolt.
👀 FLASHBACK: Earlier this week, it was reported that Labour MP for Makerfield, Andy Burnham, the likely next Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, could scrap key provisions of the bill to appease anti-deportation Labour MPs as he seeks their support. 

Image via Home Office.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Leaked documents from the British government reveal significant challenges in deporting illegal migrants due to outstanding human rights and asylum claims, prompting new legislative reforms.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Supreme Court Paves the Way for Deportation of Hundreds of Thousands of Haitians and Syrians.

The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to proceed with ending deportation protections for over 356,000 immigrants from Syria and Haiti.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump administration’s decision to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for more than 356,000 immigrants from Syria and Haiti on Thursday. The court determined that the TPS statute bars judicial review of claims challenging the termination of these protections under federal law.
📺 DETAIL: The TPS designations for Syria and Haiti were initially granted due to crises, including Syria’s civil war and Haiti’s 2010 earthquake. The Trump administration argues that neither country currently meets the criteria for “temporary” protection, with the Syrian civil war having concluded and the Haitian earthquake having occurred 16 years ago. Supreme Court’s decision reverses lower court rulings that had postponed the termination of the migrants’ TPS designations. The court’s conservative majority dismissed claims that the decision was unconstitutional or motivated by racial bias. Beyond Syrians and Haitians, the ruling could affect over one million immigrants from 17 countries with TPS designations.
🎯 IMPACT: This decision clears the way for the Trump administration to terminate work authorizations for hundreds of thousands of migrants and begin deportation proceedings against them. The ruling also limits the ability of immigrant advocacy groups to challenge TPS terminations in court, setting a significant precedent for future cases involving immigration policy.

Image by Joe Ravi.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to proceed with ending deportation protections for over 356,000 immigrants from Syria and Haiti.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Farage Warns DEI Agenda Has Put Britain on ‘Road to Disaster.’

Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage has called for an end to Britain’s “two-tier” system and a return to equal treatment, warning that the current system fosters social division, violent unrest, and unchecked extremism.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, has warned that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) has created a disastrous “two-tier” system in the United Kingdom.
📺 DETAIL: On Wednesday in London, speaking at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC) conference, an event dedicated to promoting traditional Western values, Farage warned that the present “two-tier” system in Britain risks deepening division in the country, potentially leading to violent unrest. Farage argued that returning to a meritocratic system of equal treatment was the only way to foster unity and stability. “Whether you’re a police officer on the street, whether you’re a university admissions secretary, everybody must be treated the same. We have to get back to some sense that we’re a meritocracy because if we don’t, the level of division… that sense of division grows deeper. We’re headed for very, very troubled times,” warned Farage. The Reform UK leader made reference to the murder and wrongful arrest of Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old white student stabbed by Vickrum Digwa, a 23-year-old Sikh, with an eight-inch religious dagger. Nowak was falsely accused of racial abuse by Digwa and his family. When police arrived at the scene, officers arrested the dying Nowak and refused to believe his repeated claims that he had been stabbed. Farage cited the case as an example of how the British system prioritizes false accusations of racism over real accusations of murder. “If the officer doesn’t take that accusation seriously, they will be suspended immediately,” Farage noted. The Reform UK leader also referenced the political system’s two-tier approach to Islamism. “I’m afraid the whole establishment has run away from radical Islam. We don’t even try. For example, the Muslim Brotherhood thrives in this country. It’s the main spreader of hate and extremism in Britain today. Yet, it has offices all over the country… Sensible Arab Muslim states proscribe those organizations and treat extremist terrorists for exactly what they are, and our gutless, cowardly political class have done their best to turn a blind eye to all of it,” said Farage.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We’re not policing each group with colorblindness. We’re not treating everybody the same. This is a road to disaster.” – Nigel Farage
🎯 IMPACT: Farage’s comments reflect his warnings in reaction to the unrest in Belfast, Northern Ireland, after a Sudanese refugee attempted to behead a local man earlier this month. They also build on Reform UK’s campaign against the anti-white racism embedded in Britain’s “two-tier” system. Earlier this month, Farage explained: “The reason the police behave that way is they are now trained [to do so] by police chiefs… [In] the Hampshire and Isle of Wight race report, they’re actually told you must police different ethnic communities in different ways. Meaning, literally, that white people do not get the same privileges under the law as Asian or black people.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage has called for an end to Britain's "two-tier" system and a return to equal treatment, warning that the current system fosters social division, violent unrest, and unchecked extremism.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Supreme Court Rules Asylum Seekers CAN Be Turned Away at the Border.

The Supreme Court has ruled that asylum seekers can be turned away at the U.S. border, marking a major shift in U.S. asylum policy.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of reinstating policy from the first Trump administration, allowing asylum seekers to be turned back at the U.S.-Mexico border without being granted the opportunity to enter and claim asylum. The decision concludes a lawfare battle spanning the first Trump administration, the Biden-Harris era, and the second Trump administration.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued by the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, following years of legal challenges dating back to 2017.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “In ordinary speech, no one would say that a person ‘arrives in’ a place … before the person enters that place.” – Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority.
🎯 IMPACT: The decision empowers the federal government to deny asylum seekers entry at the border, so that they cannot enter the U.S. and remain there while their asylum claim is processed, with an often equally lengthy deportation process to follow if the claim is found to be bogus.
📺 DETAIL: The case originated in 2017 during the Trump administration when the “turnback” policy was implemented to block migrants from reaching U.S. soil to claim asylum. While the Biden government rescinded the policy in 2021, allowing migrants to enter the U.S. in unprecedented numbers, President Donald J. Trump pushed to remove the legal roadblocks to its reinstatement after regaining office in 2025. Federal law allows migrants to claim asylum in the U.S. once they arrive in the country, and the Supreme Court case hinged on whether or not a migrant attempting to claim asylum at the border counted as an arrival for legal purposes. Vivek Suri, assisting the President’s Solicitor General, successfully argued that “You can’t arrive in the United States while you’re still standing in Mexico. That should be the end of this case.”

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Supreme Court has ruled that asylum seekers can be turned away at the U.S. border, marking a major shift in U.S. asylum policy.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK Officials Order Removal of Home Air Conditioning Amidst 104F Heat for Net Zero Compliance.

Local councils in Britain are enforcing strict “net zero” climate policies that limit air conditioning installations, even as the country experiences record-breaking heat.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Britons have been ordered to remove air conditioning units from their homes amid a Net Zero crackdown, even as temperatures hit 104F this week. Planning officials in London councils such as Camden and Islington are enforcing a “cooling hierarchy” that treats AC as a last resort after passive measures like opening windows or using fans, with some residents told to permanently dismantle units already installed.
📺 DETAIL: In one London case, Camden inspectors demanded removal despite the homeowner’s security concerns and existing solar panels, citing insufficient justification and the absence of ceiling fans. These local policies, influenced by the London Plan under Mayor Sadiq Khan, go beyond national rules by discouraging energy-intensive cooling to limit emissions. The Opposition politicians have condemned the approach as leaving Britain in the “dark ages,” blocking modern conveniences common elsewhere. Only about three percent of British homes have air conditioning, compared to 90 percent in the United States. The Climate Change Committee has acknowledged the growing need for cooling in care homes, schools, and hospitals. Councils claim that enforcement action against AC is rare and aimed at ensuring so-called climate-friendly alternatives are considered first.
🎯 IMPACT: Opponents argue that anti-AC policies leave Britain lagging behind other nations in modern conveniences, raising concerns about public health and comfort during heatwaves.

Image by Dinkun Chen.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Local councils in Britain are enforcing strict "net zero" climate policies that limit air conditioning installations, even as the country experiences record-breaking heat.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Takes Aim at Oil Firms for Price Gouging.

President Donald J. Trump has accused major oil companies of price gouging as gas prices remain high despite the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, sparking a Department of Justice investigation.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has called for gas prices to return to $2.25 and accused major oil companies of price gouging.
📺 DETAIL: The price of gas has not been $2.25 since January 2, 2021. At present, the national average gas price is currently $3.92 per gallon, down from $4.51 a month ago but still significantly above the $2.98 average recorded before the Iran war, which began in late February. The President’s demand to lower the price of gas came on Wednesday amid questioning from reporters in the Oval Office. The President argued that the price of gas should come down following a peace agreement with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a vital chokepoint in the global oil trade. Approximately 20 percent of oil exports pass through the strait. Trump accused major oil companies, such as ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP, of price gouging to prevent a collapse in prices following the deal. He announced that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is conducting an investigation into price gouging by oil companies. “We are doing a big investigation on it, you know. They’re not reducing the prices commensurate with what’s happening. Look, we are sending out—think of it, 19 million barrels came out yesterday… Don’t gouge our people,” he said on Wednesday.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The oil prices have been coming down so much, and we are not seeing anything at the pump by comparison to what it should be. We should be, in my opinion, at $2.25 right now at the pump. And we’re higher than that.” – President Trump
🎯 IMPACT: The DOJ investigation and public pressure could push oil companies to adjust prices more rapidly. While some experts have warned that structural factors, such as seasonal demand and supply chain costs, mean that it is unlikely that the $2.25 will be achieved in the immediate future, given the well-established relationship between the price of gas and the ease of passage through the Strait of Hormuz, it makes sense to expect a faster drop in prices than has currently been experienced. As the war between the U.S. and Iran has lasted for several months, it is possible that oil companies have used the conflict as an excuse to mark up their prices.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Donald J. Trump has accused major oil companies of price gouging as gas prices remain high despite the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, sparking a Department of Justice investigation.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Has Little Faith in ‘Extremely Liberal’ Andy Burnham, Starmer’s Expected Replacement as UK PM.

President Donald J. Trump has weighed in on Andy Burnham, Sir Keir Starmer’s likely replacement as British prime minister, suggesting he has little faith that Burnham can turn the United Kingdom around.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has offered his first public comments on Andy Burnham, who is expected to replace Sir Keir Starmer as leader of Britain’s governing Labour Party and, by extension, Prime Minister in the coming weeks.
📺 DETAIL: Andy Burnham, currently the only declared candidate to replace Sir Keir Starmer as Labour leader following the outgoing Prime Minister’s recent resignation announcement, has a history of anti-Trump rhetoric. In 2017, Burnham stated he would refuse to meet Trump during a state visit, alleging the U.S. leader was spreading “hateful extremist material” online. Burnham also criticized Trump following the 2021 Capitol protests and has described U.S. politics as “polarized” and “poisonous” during the parliamentary by-election (special election) that returned him to the House of Commons last month. It is unclear how much of Burnham’s past comments Trump is aware of, but he told reporters he had heard the Labour leadership hopeful was “extremely liberal.” 
🎯 IMPACT: Trump said that, based on what he knows about Burnham, he “probably won’t open up the North Sea” for further oil and gas exploration. Trump previously argued that Starmer could have turned his premiership around by getting immigration under control and opening up the North Sea, creating jobs and boosting energy security. Burnham’s past comments and reluctance to engage with Trump could further complicate British-American relations over the coming years.
📺 FLASHBACK: Burnham was a minister in the Tony Blair and Gordon Brown governments, and previously challenged for the Labour leadership in 2010 and 2015, without success. He left Parliament to become Mayor of Greater Manchester after this, but made a comeback to the House of Commons after a by-election last week in order to supplant Starmer, who lost the support of Labour lawmakers after heavy losses to Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party in May’s local elections.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Donald J. Trump has weighed in on Andy Burnham, Sir Keir Starmer's likely replacement as British prime minister, suggesting he has little faith that Burnham can turn the United Kingdom around.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Rupert Lowe: ‘I Have No Problem With a Multicultural Society.’

Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe has endorsed multiculturalism, causing division within his party.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Rupert Lowe, leader of the Elon Musk-backed Restore Britain party, has said he has “no problem” with multiculturalism, shocking supporters who believed he was significantly further to the right on immigration issues.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I mean, [King Charles III is] certainly, uh, very keen to, uh, propagate a multicultural society, which again I have no problem with if people integrate, uh, and they accept the prevailing laws and culture of the people they come and live amongst.” – Rupert Lowe
🎯 IMPACT: Lowe made the comments to Iranian-American podcaster Patrick Bet-David in an episode of the latter’s show published earlier this week. They have caused a rift within Lowe’s party, which relies in large part on ethnonationalists for its limited support. There was already tension within the party following comments Lowe made during an interview with Bret Weinstein on Sunday, with the 69-year-old saying, “I detest far-right, sort of, you know, ethnonationalist or neo-Nazism.”
📰 DETAIL: The Restore Britain party, backed by Elon Musk, was formed after Lowe split from Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party amid accusations of workplace bullying by two female staffers. Musk and Lowe have sought to position Reform as being to the right of Reform on immigration since then. However, Farage is more robust on multiculturalism than Lowe, stating in 2015, “We have to admit to ourselves that mass migration and multiculturalism have been a failure.” The Reform leader has been consistent on this over many years, making similar comments in 2011, 2017, and 2022, for instance.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe has endorsed multiculturalism, causing division within his party.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Denmark Moves to Ban Muslim Call to Prayer to Stop ‘Islamization.’

Denmark’s immigration minister has proposed a ban on the Islamic call to prayer in public areas, citing concerns over cultural integration and noise in public spaces.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Danish government has announced plans to ban the Islamic call to prayer in public spaces.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The call to prayer should not be heard over Danish rooftops… it has has no place in Denmark, and you shouldn’t be in any doubt whether you’ve ended up in a suburb of Islamabad when you walk around Denmark,” said Morten Bødskov, Minister for Immigration in Denmark.
📰 DETAIL: The Adhan, or call to prayer, is traditionally broadcast from mosque minarets five times a day, often via loudspeaker. In Denmark, some areas like Copenhagen already have bylaws restricting this due to noise limits. However, concerns remain that parts of the country are being heavily Islamized. On Wednesday, Denmark’s immigration minister, Morten Bødskov, announced a proposal as part of a broader effort by the Danish government, led by Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen of the governing center-left Social Democrats, to manage migration and cultural integration. The government will investigate the legality of such a ban, which has been attempted twice before by the Social Democrats; first in 2020, then in 2025, under European human rights law.
🎯 IMPACT: This represents another crackdown by the Danish government on ethnoreligious enclaves and resistance to integration. The left-leaning government has already implemented “ghetto laws” to prevent foreign nationals from clustering together in neighborhoods, potentially leading to the emergence of culturally distinct, socially parallel enclaves. In terms of asylum policy, it has implemented laws requiring asylum seekers to cover the costs of their time in the country.
👀 FLASHBACK: Denmark is not the only Scandinavian country cracking down on foreign culture and practices. In May, Sweden’s parliament unanimously voted to ban first cousin marriage and marriage between other close relatives in an attempt to tackle the honor-based culture and violence associated with Islamic immigration. Not long after, Sweden ended permanent residency visas for migrants, having already sought to filter migrants based on their willingness to integrate.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Denmark's immigration minister has proposed a ban on the Islamic call to prayer in public areas, citing concerns over cultural integration and noise in public spaces.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DOJ, FBI, and NYPD Raid Police Officials in Corruption Probe.

Federal and local authorities are investigating bribery allegations involving current and former NYPD leadership, signaling a significant crackdown on corruption in the Democrat-run city.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the New York City Police Department (NYPD), and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York executed search warrants across New York City as part of a bribery investigation involving current and former NYPD officials. Former NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey and Assistant Chief James McCarthy are at the center of the probe, which includes allegations of misconduct and corruption.
📍 WHEN & WHERE: The searches were conducted on Wednesday, across multiple locations in New York City, including Maddrey’s residence.
📺 DETAIL: The investigation into Maddrey and McCarthy is part of a broader effort by to address corruption within the NYPD. In a separate but related federal case, former chief of staff to ex–New York City Mayor Eric Adams, Frank Carone, was arrested along with three others on bribery, fraud, and money laundering charges. Prosecutors allege the group exploited the city’s migrant housing crisis by steering an emergency shelter contract to a Queens hotel in exchange for about $120,000 in bribes. The hotel reportedly secured a multimillion-dollar contract after internal objections were overridden, and investigators say the defendants later attempted to conceal the scheme once a federal probe began. All defendants face significant prison time if convicted, while Carone’s attorney has denied the allegations and called the case unfounded.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I promised New Yorkers that under my leadership the NYPD would conduct itself with integrity and that there would be a thorough investigation of any claim that members of service failed to meet that standard.” – NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch
🎯 IMPACT: The investigation underscores the federal government’s commitment to tackling corruption in state and local law enforcement. Action against the NYPD could potentially reshape the leadership structure of the nation’s largest police force. Assistant Chief James McCarthy has already been reassigned.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Federal and local authorities are investigating bribery allegations involving current and former NYPD leadership, signaling a significant crackdown on corruption in the Democrat-run city.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.