Issues with mail-invoting are already undermining Britain’s July 4 snap election. Royal Mail failures have resulted in many voters not receiving their ballots on time in over 90 constituencies (electoral districts).
Anas Sarwar, who leads the Labour Party in Scotland, complains, “One person disenfranchised is one person too many.” He notes “several cases… of people who have left to go on holiday and didn’t receive their postal votes on time.”
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
John Swinney, the First Minister of Scotland and leader of the left-separatist Scottish National Party (SNP), is complaining that the debacle could affect the election results.
Mail-in or postal voting in Britain was previously restricted to people with disabilities, soldiers serving overseas, and other select groups. However, the previous Labour government introduced postal voting for any voter on demand. Fraud has been plaguing British elections ever since.
In 2005, a major fraud scheme involving Muslim Labour candidates saw the courts overturn municipal elections in Birmingham, England’s second city. Ordinary citizens brought a case to court after the elections regulator and the police failed to intervene, exposing a scheme involving corrupt mailmen, child ballot thieves, a warehouse described as an “electoral fraud factory” where ballots were altered, and bags of ballots arriving late to counts.
Judge Richard Mawrey KC ruled the then-Labour government was presiding over “electoral fraud that would disgrace a banana republic.” He would later warn mail-in voting in the U.S. is subject to even greater abuse ahead of the 2020 election.
Conservative governments have made no meaningful changes to mail-in voting security. However, in-person voting now requires photo ID.
July 4 will be the first general election to require ID—and possibly the last. Labour, likely to win comfortably, are signaling they will abolish it.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced that the U.S. tradedeficit has decreased by 78 percent due to tariffs.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, the United States Supreme Court, and the House of Representatives.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump posted the announcement on Truth Social on Wednesday, February 18, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The United States trade deficit has been reduced by 78 percent because of the tariffs being charged to other companies and countries. It will go into positive territory during this year, for the first time in many decades. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” — Donald Trump
🎯IMPACT: Trump’s announcement on the significant drop in the trade deficit comes amid an anti-tariff revolt in Congress and a pending Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of his imposition of tariffs.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump revealed late Wednesday that his tariff policies have reduced the United States trade deficit by 78 percent, and that the deficit is expected to turn into a positive balance at some point this year. Should the trade deficit turn positive, it would be the first time the United States has posted a trade surplus in decades.
“The United States trade deficit has been reduced by 78 percent because of the tariffs being charged to other companies and countries. It will go into positive territory during this year, for the first time in many decades. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.
Trump’s tariff policies have been thrust back into the news in recent days, with the House of Representatives voting late last week—in a revolt against the lower chamber’s Republican leadership—to undo certain tariffs on Canada. Notably, six Republican lawmakers joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.
Even more important is a looming United States Supreme Court decision that could lift a large swath of tariffs imposed by the President. The high court could rule as early as Friday on whether Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on dozens of countries is unlawful. The National Pulse previously reported that an adverse ruling for the Trump administration could result in the federal government owing businesses upwards of $168 billion.
Data released last December showed the trade deficit fell sharply just months prior, declining 10.9 percent to $52.8 billion. Data from October 2025 shows the U.S. trade deficit fell to $29.4 billion, marking a 39 percent decline and the lowest level since 2009.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The British government will delay legislation on transferring the Chagos Islands, which host a strategic British-American military base, to China-allied Mauritius after criticism from President Donald J. Trump.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and the Iranian regime.
📍WHEN & WHERE: February 2026, concerning the British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Islands), Mauritius, and Iran.
💬KEY QUOTE: “DO NOT GIVE AWAY DIEGO GARCIA!” – Donald Trump
🎯IMPACT: The British government is reconsidering the transfer, which would have seen Britain cede sovereignty over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius while paying large sums of money to continue leasing Diego Garcia, which hosts the military base.
IN FULL
The British government has delayed legislation to transfer sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Islands) to China-allied Mauritius after President Donald J. Trump blasted the agreement. Chagos includes Diego Garcia, which hosts a strategic British-American military base, and while the British government has committed to continue leasing the island from Mauritius, Trump believes the loss of full British sovereignty will undermine the base.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s far-left government will now take a “pause for thought” on the bill implementing the transfer. However, Starmer is also reportedly refusing to guarantee that Britain will authorize the use of Diego Garcia for possible U.S. strikes on Iran.
Trump called the bizarre deal, which would see Britain surrender the islands and pay for the privilege of doing so in exchange for nothing, an “act of GREAT STUPIDITY” and “weakness,” urging Starmer to abandon it.
“We will always be ready, willing, and able to fight for the U.K., but they have to remain strong in the face of Wokeism, and other problems put before them. DO NOT GIVE AWAY DIEGO GARCIA!” he wrote on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday, directly contradicting a U.S. State Department press release claiming the U.S. supported the deal on Tuesday.
The British government’s motivations for paying to give away sovereign territory in the Indian Ocean are unclear. Starmer and his officials have cited an International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling in favor of Mauritius. However, the ruling was non-binding, and the court has no power to issue a binding ruling, still less enforce one. Notably, Starmer, his negotiator Attorney General Richard Hermer, and Mauritius negotiator Philippe Sands are all former colleagues or personal friends, with an “anti-imperial” ideological bent. Hermer, in particular, has denounced the British Empire, of which Chagos is a remnant, as “racist” and supported paying reparations to foreign governments.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) is formally requesting assistance from President Donald J. Trump in addressing the ongoing environmental crisis in the Potomac River caused by a collapsed sewer pipe running between Maryland and Virginia.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Mayor Muriel Bowser, President Donald J. Trump, and D.C. Water—the public utility overseeing the Potomac Interceptor pipe.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Bowser’s request was made on February 18, 2026.
🎯IMPACT: The Potomac Interceptor pipe, which ruptured on January 19, released an estimated 250 million gallons of raw, untreated wastewater into the river, with D.C. Water estimating repairs could take 10 months.
IN FULL
Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) is formally requesting assistance from President Donald J. Trump in addressing the ongoing environmental crisis in the Potomac River caused by a collapsed sewer pipe running between Maryland and Virginia. The Potomac Interceptor pipe, which ruptured on January 19 near Cabin John, Maryland, about seven miles north of Georgetown, released an estimated 250 million gallons of raw, untreated waste water into the river—which flows through the heart of the nation’s capital—before the flow was diverted into the historic Chesapeake and Ohio Canal (C&O Canal).
On Wednesday evening, Mayor Bowser sent a letter requesting aid to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the latter still being able to disperse emergency and provide regional assistance—under the orders of President Trump—despite being impacted by the ongoing partial government shutdown initiated by Senate Democrats. In the letter, the D.C. Mayor requests that President Trump formally declare a federal emergency so that FEMA can assist with repairs to the sewer pipe and help monitor—along with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)—the Potomac River’s water quality. Concerningly, spot tests just downstream of the spill have shown E. coli levels near the site to be significantly higher than the EPA limits for swimming. Officials have also detected bacteria linked to staph infections and MRSA.
The National Pulse reported earlier this week that President Trump directed FEMA to prepare a response to the crisis and help coordinate communication between federal and state agencies—including officials in Maryland, Virginia, and D.C However, without a formal request by state and local officials, the scope of FEMA‘s involvement remained limited.
“There is a massive Ecological Disaster unfolding in the Potomac River as a result of the Gross Mismanagement of Local Democrat Leaders, particularly, Governor Wes Moore, of Maryland. A sewer line breach in Maryland has caused millions of gallons of raw sewage to be dumped directly into the Potomac River, a result of incompetent Local and State Management of Essential Waste Management Systems,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social, criticizing the local response late Monday afternoon.
D.C. Water, the public utility that manages the Potomac Interceptor pipe, has stated it could take up to 10 months to repair the rupture. City officials have pointed to a number of large underwater boulders that fell into the breach as the main obstacle preventing expedited patching of the sewer line.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has clarified that most talk shows, such as The View and Jimmy Kimmel Live!, no longer qualify for regulatory exemptions allowing them to feature political candidates without meeting equal time requirements.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: FCC Chair Brendan Carr, various network talk shows, and political candidates, including Texas state Representative James Talarico (D).
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced during an FCC meeting on Wednesday, February 19, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Congress passed the equal time provision for a very specific reason. They did not want the media leads in Hollywood and in New York to put their thumbs on the scale and pick their winners and losers in primaries and general elections. That’s the point.” – Brendan Carr
🎯IMPACT: Television networks can apply for exemptions from the Equal Time Rule, but according to Chairman Carr, “The ones we have seen have yet to establish that they qualify for the bona fide news exception.”
IN FULL
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) held an open meeting on Wednesday, where the agency determined that daytime and late-night talk shows will no longer qualify for the news exemption from the Equal Time Rule (Section 315 of the Communications Act of 1934) granted to most news programming. Previously, talk shows like The View and Jimmy Kimmel Live! could host political candidates for public office without having to give equal time to the other candidates in the race.
“The general rule is equal time applies,” FCC Chairman Brendan Carr explained regarding the provision. He added, “There’s narrow exceptions you have to fit in.” Notably, this isn’t the first time the Equal Time Rule has impacted late-night television. During the 2024 presidential election, NBC granted the Trump campaign a 90-second ad spot amid allegations that Kamala Harris’s surprise appearance on Saturday Night Live (SNL) violated the Equal Time Rule. Harris’s appearance on SNL was for one minute and 30 seconds, allowing other presidential campaigns to receive equal airtime—about 90 seconds—per FCC regulations.
“Congress passed the equal time provision for a very specific reason,” Carr said, adding, “They did not want the media leads in Hollywood and in New York to put their thumbs on the scale and pick their winners and losers in primaries and general elections. That’s the point.”
The status change for daytime and late-night talk shows comes amid a stunt pulled by Texas state Representative James Talarico (D), who is running for the U.S. Senate. Talarico was slated to appear on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert; however, attorneys with CBS appear to have raised concerns about potential Equal Time violations, leading to the interview being posted only to social media and not aired on television. Colbert and Talarico both attempted to claim the segment as quashed by the FCC, which has consequently boosted the Texas Democrat’s campaign fundraising.
Despite what Colbert and Talarico claim, the Equal Time Rule has impacted non-traditional “news” programming in the past. In 2003, CBS canceled a segment on The Late Late Show featuring images of California recall election candidates to avoid having to show all 135 candidates. Even still, television networks can apply for exemptions from the Equal Time Rule, but according to Chairman Carr, “The ones we have seen have yet to establish that they qualify for the bona fide news exception.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, was arrested by British police in connection with revelations in the Jeffrey Epstein files released by the U.S. government.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Thames Valley Police, and the late Jeffrey Epstein.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Arrest occurred on Thursday, his 66th birthday, in the United Kingdom.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Following a thorough assessment, we have now opened an investigation into this allegation of misconduct in public office.” – Assistant Chief Constable Oliver Wright
🎯IMPACT: Mountbatten-Windsor could face life imprisonment if convicted.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, previously Prince Andrew, was arrested by Thames Valley Police on Thursday—his 66th birthday. The arrest relates to his ties to deceased pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The ex-prince, whose royal titles were stripped by King Charles III last year, is suspected of misconduct in public office. Officers have carried out searches at properties in Berkshire and Norfolk.
The case centres on claims that Mountbatten-Windsor passed confidential trade documents to Epstein. An email from the Epstein files, released by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), indicates he forwarded official trade reports on Hong Kong, Singapore, and Vietnam to Epstein.
Virginia Giuffre, an Epstein accuser who died last year, had previously accused Mountbatten-Windsor of sexually abusing her when she was 17. Her family welcomed the arrest, saying, “Today, our broken hearts have been lifted at the news that no one is above the law, not even royalty.”
King Charles III has called for a fair investigation, stressing, “Let me state clearly: the law must take its course.”
The release of the Epstein files has also put pressure on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Britain’s governing Labour Party, with Labour grandee Lord Peter Mandelson, whom Starmer appointed as ambassador to the U.S., also accused of passing confidential information to Epstein.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: An illegal immigrant from Ecuador, charged with sexual abuse of a child, was captured by federal authorities after being released due to Connecticut’s sanctuary policies.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Christian Espinosa-Sarango, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
📍WHEN & WHERE: Arrested on February 13 in North Haven, Connecticut, following charges filed on December 19, 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “These are the types of monsters Connecticut sanctuary politicians are releasing from their jails and onto the streets to perpetuate more crimes against children.” – Outgoing DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin
🎯IMPACT: The case highlights the dangers of sanctuary policies and the necessity of federal-local law enforcement cooperation.
IN FULL
Officers with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested Christian Espinosa-Sarango, an Ecuadorian national unlawfully present in the United States, on February 13 in North Haven, according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Espinosa-Sarango faces charges filed December 19, 2025, including sexual assault, illegal sexual contact with a child, and enticing minors with a computer.
Court records state he communicated online with an undercover law enforcement officer posing as the aunt of a 13-year-old girl. After being told the girl’s age, he allegedly requested explicit photographs, proposed sexual encounters, and arranged to meet her at a hotel, where authorities arrested him.
Officials said Espinosa-Sarango attempted to flee in his vehicle during the arrest, forcing officers to break a car window to take him into custody.
ICE lodged a detainer request with local law enforcement on December 23, but it was not honored under Connecticut’s sanctuary policies, resulting in his release. DHS criticized the state’s Trust Act, which limits cooperation between local agencies and federal immigration authorities.
Outgoing DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin condemned the policies, stating, “These are the types of monsters Connecticut sanctuary politicians are releasing from their jails and onto the streets to perpetuate more crimes against children.” She added, “We need local law enforcement to cooperate with us to get these heinous criminals out of our neighborhoods. Sanctuary policies make Americans less safe.”
McLaughlin praised ICE agents for apprehending Espinosa-Sarango, saying, “Thankfully, because of our brave ICE agents, Christian Espinosa-Sarango, a pedophile, will never walk American streets again. Sanctuary politicians must stop releasing pedophiles, murderers, rapists, and kidnappers into our neighborhoods.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is proposing a legal change to restrict free transportation for illegal immigrants.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Department of Transportation and the Trump administration, with input from Marc Molinaro.
📍WHEN & WHERE: February 18, 2026, in the United States.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Systems that receive Federal funds are not using them to circumvent or break Federal immigrationlaw.” – Proposal Text
🎯IMPACT: Potentially restricts local governments from using federal transit funds for migrant transportation.
IN FULL
The United States Department of Transportation (DOT) is drafting legislation that would prevent states and local governments from using federal transit funds to provide free transportation to illegal immigrants. The reform would prohibit the use of federal dollars for services that assist migrants in evading federal immigration enforcement. Sources familiar with the discussions say the language could be written broadly enough to cover a range of free transportation programs offered in some Democrat-led cities.
The measure is expected to be included in a broader surface transportation reauthorization package being assembled by DOT and the White House. Other provisions reportedly under consideration include banning speed cameras in Washington, D.C., and limiting federal funding for fare-free bus programs.
If enacted, the legislation would give Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy authority to withhold federal funding from transit agencies found to be using federal funds to transport illegal immigrants in ways that help them avoid federal authorities. Labor unions are reportedly watching the proposal closely.
The effort reflects a broader strategy by the Trump administration to use federal funding as leverage. DOT recently warned New York officials that transportation funds could be revoked after determining that more than half of the state’s commercial drivers were in the country illegally. The administration has also moved to cut funding to the Smithsonian Institution over disputes involving diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Republican Steve Hilton has taken the lead in the California governor’s race, according to a new poll.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Steve Hilton, Governor Gavin Newsom (D), Representative Eric Swalwell (D), Sheriff Chad Bianco (R), former Rep. Katie Porter (D), and billionaire Tom Steyer.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The poll was conducted from February 13–14 in California, ahead of the June 2 primaryelection.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The Republican electorate in California is split between Steve Hilton (38%) and Chad Bianco (37%), while Hilton also picks up a plurality of independent voter support at 22%,” said Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling.
🎯IMPACT: If Hilton wins, he would be the first Republican governor of California in two decades.
IN FULL
Republican Steve Hilton has emerged as the early front-runner in the race for governor of California, according to a new survey from Emerson College Polling. The former adviser to former British Prime Minister David Cameron leads the crowded field with 17 percent support, up five points since December, while 21 percent of voters remain undecided.
Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell and Republican Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco are tied for second at 14 percent each. Controversial former Rep. Katie Porter follows with 10 percent, while billionaire Tom Steyer trails closely behind. Among Republican voters, Hilton holds a narrow edge over Bianco, and he captures 22 percent support from independents.
“The Republican electorate in California is split between Steve Hilton (38 percent) and Chad Bianco (37 percent), while Hilton also picks up a plurality of independent voter support at 22 percent,” said Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling.
The poll, conducted February 13–14 among 1,000 likely voters, has a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. California’s last Republican governor was Arnold Schwarzenegger, reelected in 2006. The state’s top-two primary system advances the two highest vote-getters, regardless of party, from the June 2 primary to the November 5 general election.
Hilton has raised nearly $6 million, second only to Steyer, who is largely self-funding. His campaign centers on housing affordability and economic concerns. According to the survey, 53 percent of voters say they have considered leaving California due to the high cost of living. Hilton has opposed proposals such as a billionaire tax and a mileage-based tax, and he has criticized Governor Gavin Newsom (D) and Mayor Karen Bass (D) over their response to the Palisades Fire in Los Angeles.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) proposed a 9.5 percent property tax hike in his $127-billion preliminary budget to close a projected $5.4-billion budget gap.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zohran Mamdani, Governor Kathy Hochul (D), the New York Apartment Association (NYAA), and the City Council.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The budget proposal was unveiled this week in New York City, with implementation aimed for the next fiscal year starting July 1.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Now he is proposing an across the board tax hike that will drive thousands of rent-stabilized buildings into further bankruptcy.” – Kenny Burgos, CEO of the New York Apartment Association.
🎯IMPACT: Landlords warn the proposal could bankrupt rent-stabilized properties and harm affordable housing.
IN FULL
Landlords across New York City are sharply criticizing Zohran Mamdani’s proposed 9.5 percent property tax increase, part of his $127 billion preliminary budget aimed at closing a projected $5.4 billion deficit over the next two fiscal years. Opponents warn the plan could further strain rent-stabilized housing and small property owners.
Kenny Burgos, CEO of the New York Apartment Association, said the proposal contradicts Mamdani’s campaign promises. “Mayor Mamdani promised that he would fight for property tax reform to help overtaxed apartment buildings when he was on the campaign trail,” Burgos said in a statement. “Now he is proposing an across the board tax hike that will drive thousands of rent-stabilized buildings into further bankruptcy,” he added.
The budget, which takes effect in July, outlines two options to address the shortfall. Mamdani has expressed support for raising income taxes on those earning more than $1 million annually and increasing corporate taxes. However, because such changes would require state approval, and Governor Kathy Hochul (D) has voiced opposition to new taxes on high earners, the mayor is considering raising property taxes instead, a move the city can enact on its own.
If approved, the property tax rate would rise from 12.28 percent to 13.45 percent, generating an estimated $3.7 billion per year. The Citizens Budget Commission estimates the increase would cost the average owner of a one-, two-, or three-family home about $700 annually.
Ann Korchak, board president of the Small Property Owners of New York, condemned the plan. “The mayor has declared war on thousands of immigrant property owners, most of them multigenerational families, who have their entire life’s savings invested in their small buildings,” she said.
Hochul questioned whether the tax hike is necessary, stating, “I don’t know that that’s necessary, but let’s find out what is really necessary to close that gap.”
Mamdani’s housing agenda has drawn controversy beyond the budget fight. In recent weeks, critics have pointed to reporting highlighting his administration’s rental policy hearings that have allegedly restricted New York City public housing tenants from criticizing city officials.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: NYU Langone Health announced it will permanently discontinue its transgender “treatment” program for minors.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: NYU Langone Health, the Trump administration, and childrenwho faced being transitioned at the hospital.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The decision was announced in Manhattan, New York, following regulatory pressures.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Given the recent departure of our medical director, coupled with the current regulatory environment, we made the difficult decision to discontinue our Transgender Youth Health Program.” – NYU Langone spokesman
🎯IMPACT: The hospital will redirect minors to other local facilities.
IN FULL
NYU Langone Health will permanently shut down its transgender “treatment” program for minors, citing regulatory pressure and leadership changes after the Trump administration threatened to withdraw federal funding from hospitals transitioning children.
“Given the recent departure of our medical director, coupled with the current regulatory environment, we made the difficult decision to discontinue our Transgender Youth Health Program,” a spokesman for NYU Langone said in a statement. The hospital said it would support affected patients during the transition and emphasized that its pediatric mental health services will remain in place.
The medical center has updated its website, replacing the name “Transgender Youth Health Program” with “Gender & Sexuality Service.” While counseling services will continue, minors seeking hormone treatments will be referred to other providers.
The decision follows policy actions by President Donald J. Trump aimed at restricting gender-affirming care for minors. In January 2025, Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to withhold funding from institutions that provide the “chemical and surgical mutilation” of children. The policy seeks to block federal support for puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and certain surgeries for individuals under 19. The administration has also moved to roll back prior federal guidance expanding gender identity protections in healthcare and to restrict transition-related coverage under federal employee health plans.
NYU Langone is not alone. Baystate Health, the largest healthcare system in western Massachusetts, announced it would stop prescribing hormone therapies to minors, pointing to the evolving regulatory landscape and the need to safeguard Medicaid and Medicare funding, which covers a large share of its patients. “This decision offers patients the specialized expertise and continuity of care they need and deserve,” a spokesman said.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.