Friday, July 31, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Mail-In Voting Calamity Hits UK 2 Days Before Election.

Issues with mail-in voting are already undermining Britain’s July 4 snap election. Royal Mail failures have resulted in many voters not receiving their ballots on time in over 90 constituencies (electoral districts).

Anas Sarwar, who leads the Labour Party in Scotland, complains, “One person disenfranchised is one person too many.” He notes “several cases… of people who have left to go on holiday and didn’t receive their postal votes on time.”

John Swinney, the First Minister of Scotland and leader of the left-separatist Scottish National Party (SNP), is complaining that the debacle could affect the election results.

Mail-in or postal voting in Britain was previously restricted to people with disabilities, soldiers serving overseas, and other select groups. However, the previous Labour government introduced postal voting for any voter on demand. Fraud has been plaguing British elections ever since.

In 2005, a major fraud scheme involving Muslim Labour candidates saw the courts overturn municipal elections in Birmingham, England’s second city. Ordinary citizens brought a case to court after the elections regulator and the police failed to intervene, exposing a scheme involving corrupt mailmen, child ballot thieves, a warehouse described as an “electoral fraud factory” where ballots were altered, and bags of ballots arriving late to counts.

Judge Richard Mawrey KC ruled the then-Labour government was presiding over “electoral fraud that would disgrace a banana republic.” He would later warn mail-in voting in the U.S. is subject to even greater abuse ahead of the 2020 election.

Conservative governments have made no meaningful changes to mail-in voting security. However, in-person voting now requires photo ID.

July 4 will be the first general election to require ID—and possibly the last. Labour, likely to win comfortably, are signaling they will abolish it.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Admin Advances New Hiring Rule to Eliminate DEI in Federal Government.

The Trump administration has taken steps to eliminate so-called race-conscious hiring practices in federal agencies, emphasizing merit-based employment standards.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has removed federal hiring guidelines that emphasized race-conscious hiring practices. 
📺 DETAIL: On Thursday, the Trump administration removed a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) measure from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The OPM is the agency responsible for setting the federal government’s hiring policies. Specifically, the President removed the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, a set of guidelines first formulated in 1978 to encourage race-conscious hiring decisions. The guidelines had focused on “disparate impact,” the idea that certain hiring practices can produce insufficient representation for different racial groups. Critics argue that the guidelines ultimately lead to the prioritization of race over merit in federal hiring and promotion decisions. The Trump administration’s new rule removing the guidelines will be finalized 60 days after its issuance. This follows an opinion from the Department of Justice concluding that the guidelines were unconstitutional.
💬 KEY QUOTE:Federal hiring should be based on merit, qualifications, and the ability to perform the job… This rule ensures OPM’s regulations reflect legal guidance while preserving the rigorous, job-related standards that help agencies recruit and hire the most qualified workforce in service to the American people,” said OPM Director Scott Kupor.
🎯 IMPACT: This move is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to dismantle DEI nationwide. Back in February, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the President’s executive order abolishing DEI in federal employment, contracting, and grant processes. Since then, it is clear that the administration feels sufficiently empowered to push forward with rolling back DEI measures. However, while advancements are being made at the federal level, there are efforts being made at the state level, specifically in Democrat-controlled states, to retain DEI measures, creating tension between federal and state government.
📺 FLASHBACK: In January 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order aimed at dismantling the “dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race- and sex-based preferences under the guise of so-called ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI) or ‘diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility’ (DEIA) that can violate the civil-rights laws of this Nation.

Image by Tony Webster.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump administration has taken steps to eliminate so-called race-conscious hiring practices in federal agencies, emphasizing merit-based employment standards.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

U.S. 30-Year Mortgage Rate Hits Yearly High of 6.66%.

The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate has risen to 6.66 percent, adding financial strain on prospective homebuyers.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:  The average rate on a 30-year fixed U.S. mortgage has climbed for the fourth consecutive week, reaching its highest level in a year and adding another challenge for prospective homebuyers facing elevated borrowing costs. Mortgage buyer Freddie Mac reported Thursday that the benchmark rate increased to 6.66 percent from 6.58 percent last week, compared with 6.72 percent a year ago.
📺 DETAIL: The average rate on a 15-year fixed mortgage, commonly used for refinancing, also rose to 6.04 percent from 5.96 percent the previous week, up from 5.85 percent one year ago. Higher mortgage rates can add hundreds of dollars to monthly payments, reducing buyers’ purchasing power. Mortgage rates are influenced by factors including Federal Reserve policy, inflation expectations, and movements in the bond market, particularly the 10-year Treasury yield. Rates have generally trended higher this year as the Iran war has pushed crude oil prices higher, increasing concerns about inflation and driving long-term bond yields upward. The 10-year Treasury yield stood at 4.66 percent Thursday, up from 3.97 percent in late February before the conflict began.
🎯 IMPACT: Higher mortgage rates are adding substantially increasing monthly costs for borrowers, driving down purchasing power and discouraging prospective homebuyers. This trend has contributed to sluggish home sales in the U.S. as affordability challenges continue.

Image by respres.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate has risen to 6.66 percent, adding financial strain on prospective homebuyers.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Florida AG Initiates Investigation Into Fauci’s COVID-19 Actions.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has announced an investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci, citing concerns over his conduct and transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:  Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (R) announced on Wednesday that his office is launching an investigation into former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci over his conduct during the COVID-19 pandemic. The announcement came after Fauci appeared before the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, where he invoked his Fifth Amendment right and declined to answer lawmakers’ questions regarding the federal government’s pandemic response.
📺 DETAIL: Uthmeier criticized Fauci’s testimony in a social media post, saying his “lack of candor to Congress is unbelievable” and adding that it was “past time we get the truth of what happened during COVID.” During the hearing, Fauci said he was invoking his constitutional right against self-incrimination on the advice of his attorneys. Fauci declined to answer questions more than 100 times during the hearing. The investigation follows earlier comments by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R), who said Florida could examine whether Fauci’s actions violated any state laws after former President Joe Biden issued him a preemptive federal pardon before leaving office. DeSantis has described Biden’s pardon of Fauci as one of his “greatest abuses of power” and previously said Florida’s attorney general would review whether the state has jurisdiction to pursue any potential legal action.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “My office is launching an investigation into Dr. Fauci. It’s past time we get the truth of what happened during COVID.” – Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier
🎯 IMPACT: The investigation could lead to Fauci facing legal consequences for his actions during the pandemic, as the blanket pardon he received from former President Joe Biden does not cover state crimes.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has announced an investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci, citing concerns over his conduct and transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Mexican Illegal Charged With Kidnapping and Sexual Assault of Minor Teen in Public Park.

A Mexican illegal immigrant has been charged with kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl in Idaho.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Jose Alberto Lozano-Flores, a 29-year-old Mexican national, was arrested in Boise, Idaho, on charges of felony first-degree kidnapping, felony lewd conduct with a child under 16, and misdemeanor resisting and obstructing after allegedly kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl. The incident occurred around 9 PM on July 22 at Freedom Park in Star, where authorities say Lozano-Flores approached the unknown victim, sexually assaulted her, and drove off with her in his vehicle.
📺 DETAIL: He was taken into custody the next afternoon near Quinn’s Pond, where the minor was also recovered and reunited with her family. Lozano-Flores was booked into Ada County Jail, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has lodged a detainer to prevent his release. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), he unlawfully entered the United States through New Mexico in 2023, agreed to a voluntary return to Mexico after encountering Border Patrol, but later re-entered illegally again at an unknown time and place. Significantly, Idaho cooperates with federal immigration authorities and is not a sanctuary state.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “ICE will work with our partners in Idaho to ensure that he is not released from jail and is never loose in American communities again.” – DHS Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis
🎯 IMPACT: Lozano-Flores’s arrest underscores the ongoing threat to public safety posed by the huge number of illegal immigrants at large in the United States. It also highlights the importance of cooperation between local and federal authorities, with the Mexican being unlikely to be released by state authorities instead of handed over to ICE under sanctuary-style laws.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A Mexican illegal immigrant has been charged with kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl in Idaho.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Activates Dormant ‘Alien Terrorist Removal Court’ to Deport ISIS Supporter.

The Trump administration has activated a long-dormant court to pursue the deportation of an Afghan woman accused of supporting Islamic State and radicalizing her family, marking the first-ever Alien Terrorist Removal Court case since it was created in 1996.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has activated the Alien Terrorist Removal Court for the first time.
📺 DETAIL: The court has been activated as part of an effort to deport Nazira Haji Zada, an Afghan woman accused of supporting ISIS. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has alleged that Haji Zada supported Islamic State (ISIS), pledged allegiance to it, and indoctrinated her son and son-in-law into ISIS ideology. Her son and son-in-law have since been convicted of plotting a terrorist attack on Election Day 2024. According to federal law, the government is allowed to deport non-citizens who have engaged in or supported terrorist activities. Haji Zada has been a lawful permanent resident in the U.S. since 2018, although she does not have citizenship. The court was created under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, but has never heard a case. Importantly, the court can consider classified evidence while shielding sensitive intelligence in working towards its decision. “The allegations in this case show the matriarch of an ISIS-sympathizing family aiding in a plot to launch a mass casualty attack on American voters on Election Day,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Congress created the Alien Terrorist Removal Court three decades ago to remove from the United States alien terrorists who never should have been here in the first place.” – Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
🎯 IMPACT: This is the first time that the court has been activated, having been dormant since its creation in 1996. The outcome of the case could determine whether the court becomes a regular device in deportation operations, particularly when dealing with foreign-born extremists who are permanent residents. The activation of the court means that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts must form a panel to assess Haji Zada’s case. Against the backdrop of author Salman Rushdie’s would-be assassin being found guilty of attempting to carry out a fatwa and supporting Hezbollah in federal court, this move represents a broader pivot towards tackling Islamic terrorism on U.S. soil.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump administration has activated a long-dormant court to pursue the deportation of an Afghan woman accused of supporting Islamic State and radicalizing her family, marking the first-ever Alien Terrorist Removal Court case since it was created in 1996.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

DATA: One-Third of Democrats Now Identify as Socialists.

A new poll has revealed that a significant portion of Democrat and Democrat-leaning voters identify as democratic socialists, underscoring the ideological divide within the party ahead of the midterms.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Approximately one-third of Democrats and Democrat-leaning adults identify as democratic socialists, according to a CNN poll conducted by SSRS.
📺 DETAIL: The poll revealed that 59 percent of democratic socialists within the Democrat Party are under the age of 45. The poll also revealed that 57 percent of self-identified democratic socialists are white. Self-described democratic socialist Democrat voters are also less likely to hold college degrees or earn over $100,000 annually. Significantly, democratic socialists tend to be more energized about voting in the upcoming midterms. Whereas 57 percent of non-socialist Democrats were “extremely motivated to vote,” 66 percent of democratic socialists said the same. Roughly one-third of Democrat and Democrat-leaning adults identify as democratic socialists. They are more likely to view the Democrat Party favorably than non-socialist Democrats, with 68 percent having a positive view of the party. Democratic socialists are almost twice as likely to support the party moving to the left than non-socialist Democrats, 36 percent of whom would be unhappy with an explicitly socialist candidate.
🎯 IMPACT: This data demonstrates the rise of democratic socialism within the Democrat Party. The increasing prominence of socialist candidates and policies, especially ahead of a tight midterm election, may create problems for the party, particularly in competitive areas. Pursuing radical and often unpopular policies runs the risk of alienating moderate or conservative Democrat-leaning voters. The shift towards democratic socialism within the party indicates that a large portion of Democrats believe that the party’s failure in the 2024 Presidential election was the result of being insufficiently radical and left-wing, despite substantial evidence to the contrary, especially when it comes to social issues such as gender transitions for children.
📺 FLASHBACK: Earlier this month, Representative Gwen Moore (D-WI) encouraged her fellow Democrats to embrace the term “socialist.” Zohran Mamdani, the Ugandan immigrant who now serves as Mayor of New York City, is currently the most successful Democrat candidate in recent years to identify explicitly as a socialist. The CNN poll represents the continuation of a trend that has been accelerating for over a year. Back in 2025, it was reported that roughly one quarter of the Democrat Party views democratic socialist Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) as the “face” of the party.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new poll has revealed that a significant portion of Democrat and Democrat-leaning voters identify as democratic socialists, underscoring the ideological divide within the party ahead of the midterms.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Pro-Life Christian Father Subjected to Armed Raid Under Biden Wins Major Settlement.

The Trump Justice Department has settled with a pro-life Christian whose home was raided by heavily armed FBI agents under Joe Biden.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has reached a seven-figure settlement with Tennessee pro-life advocate Paul Vaughn, whose home was raided by heavily armed Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents in 2022 as part of the Biden-Harris regime’s enforcement of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act against pro-lifers. Vaughn, a Christian father of 11, had been charged over his participation in a 2021 protest outside an abortion clinic that included prayer and hymn singing, and he was later sentenced to six months of house arrest before receiving a presidential pardon from President Donald J. Trump in January 2025.
📺 DETAIL:  The settlement, announced by the Thomas More Society, resolves Vaughn’s lawsuit against the Justice Department and includes an acknowledgment that the department abused its authority during the prosecution. Recently released Justice Department emails revealed internal discussions about conducting arrests rather than allowing defendants to surrender voluntarily, with one official suggesting the FBI preferred making arrests. Vaughn said the experience strengthened his Christian faith. His lawyer, Steve Crampton, argued the case reflected a politically motivated prosecution and praised the Trump administration for addressing actions taken under the Biden-Harris regime. Crampton said additional settlements involving other pro-life activists could follow, and renewed calls for Congress to repeal the FACE Act, describing it as unconstitutional and vulnerable to political misuse. The House Judiciary Committee previously approved legislation to repeal the law, although the measure has not advanced further in Congress.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I think there’s no question that this was a politicized prosecution… meant purely to punish and deter pro-lifers from ever going back out again.” – Steve Crampton, Thomas More Society lawyer
🎯 IMPACT: Legal experts believe more settlements with pro-lifers could follow Vaughn’s. Meanwhile, calls for Congress to repeal the FACE Act are growing.

Image by Steve Fernie.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Trump Justice Department has settled with a pro-life Christian whose home was raided by heavily armed FBI agents under Joe Biden.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK PM Burnham Refuses to Commit to 3% Defense Spending Target.

New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s reluctance to commit to a three percent of GDP defense spending target by 2030 has raised national security concerns.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has refused to commit to increasing defense spending to three percent of GDP by 2030.
📰 DETAIL: On Wednesday, Prime Minister Burnham failed to provide a commitment to increase defense spending to three percent of GDP (Gross Domestic Product) by 2030. Instead, Prime Minister Burnham pledged to increase Britain’s “core defense” budget to 3.5 percent of GDP by 2035—by which point he will be entering his late sixties and likely out of office. Core defense refers to fundamental military capabilities and readiness, such as conventional forces and hardware, nuclear weapons, and cybersecurity. “When it comes to defense obviously those commitments relate to the Parliament after this one in terms of our NATO commitments… I have been very clear that we will honor those commitments,” said the Prime Minister, before suggesting that reforms in other areas would ultimately allow for more spending on defense. “If we change those things then we will open up the way of meeting our commitments on defense,” he added. This follows growing criticism from defense experts that the former Mayor of Greater Manchester lacks a clear national defense strategy and has not given any indication that he will allocate a sufficient amount of funding towards protecting the United Kingdom.
🎯 IMPACT: The Prime Minister’s lack of commitment to the 2030 target has raised concerns about Britain’s military readiness, which is currently poor. Critics have characterized the Prime Minister’s non-committal answer as sending a message of weakness to Britain’s adversaries. This creates a particular problem for Prime Minister Burnham, as he appointed John Healey as his Chancellor, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. Healey is a vocal advocate of the 2030 defense target, and resigned as Secretary of Defence under Burnham’s predecessor, former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, just weeks ago, after Starmer failed to meet the spending target. Moreover, if Burnham fails to meet the three percent target and Healey does not resign or apply some kind of public pressure, Healey’s credibility will be damaged as well. This coincides with the start of the Pentagon’s review of the United States’ military footprint in Europe, which was triggered in response to European NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) countries repeatedly failing to meet their defense spending targets, inviting accusations of “freeriding” on U.S. protection.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The bottom line is Burnham hasn’t made the transition from being a mayor of a big city to the prime minister of a large country of 70 million people… the number one priority is the defense of the country.” – Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham's reluctance to commit to a three percent of GDP defense spending target by 2030 has raised national security concerns.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Salman Rushdie Attacker Found Guilty of Iran-Linked Islamic Terrorism.

Hadi Matar, the radical Islamic terrorist charged with stabbing Satanic Verses author Salman Rushdie multiple times, has been found guilty of attempting to carry out a fatwa and providing support to terrorists in federal court.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Hadi Matar, the man who attacked author Salman Rushdie in 2022, has been found guilty of attempting to carry out a fatwa and providing material support to Hezbollah.
📺 DETAIL: Back in August 2022, then-24-year-old Hadi Matar, a U.S.-born Muslim of Lebanese descent, stabbed Salman Rushdie multiple times while he was giving a public lecture in Chautauqua, western New York. The attack left Rushdie blind in one eye. On Wednesday, the now-28-year-old Matar was found guilty in federal court of attempting to carry out a fatwa (an Islamic legal ruling) issued by the Iranian government. He was found guilty of three charges: attempting to provide material support to Hezbollah (an Iran-backed terrorist group based in Lebanon), committing an act of terrorism that transcended national boundaries, and providing material support to terrorists. The fatwa was issued by the Islamic Republic’s then-Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, back in 1989. The fatwa called for Rushdie’s death due to his novel The Satanic Verses, which is regarded as blasphemous by Muslims. Matar reportedly spent a year studying the fatwa. Matar is already serving a 25-year sentence after being convicted in state court last year. Prosecutors argued that Matar was inspired to carry out the attack by the fatwa and Hezbollah’s ideology. His writings, which were presented as evidence, referenced “Jihad” and the “need to kill him [Rushdie] ASAP” as well as evidence of Matar praising Hezbollah’s leadership.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “He wanted to be forever revered as a Hezbollah martyr.” – Federal Prosecutor Timothy Lynch
🎯 IMPACT: Matar faces a maximum of life in prison. He will be sentenced on November 3. The case underscores the enduring influence of Islamic fatwas issued decades ago, as well as the role of Iran-backed terror groups like Hezbollah in enabling global terrorism. This story underscores the longstanding tension between freedom of speech and Islam in the West.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Hadi Matar, the radical Islamic terrorist charged with stabbing Satanic Verses author Salman Rushdie multiple times, has been found guilty of attempting to carry out a fatwa and providing support to terrorists in federal court.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Over 500,000 ‘Boriswave’ Migrants May Dodge Visa Restrictions Thanks to New PM.

The British government under new leader Andy Burnham is considering exempting foreign care workers from proposed changes to permanent residency.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham is considering an exemption for more than half a million recent migrants to stay in the country.
📺 DETAIL: On Wednesday, it was reported that Prime Minister Burnham was considering an exemption for foreign-born social care workers who arrived during the “Boriswave,” an influx of roughly 1.6 million foreign workers and their relatives under former Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson. During Johnson’s premiership, between 2022 and 2024, 612,226 migrants arrived on Health and Care Worker visas, sometimes to “work” for care homes that did not exist. The rumored exemption would apply to reforms being pursued by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, roughly equivalent to the U.S. Homeland Security Secretary. Mahmood’s reforms aim to extend the waiting period for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) from five to 15 years. ILR grants the equivalent of permanent residency in the United Kingdom and more access to welfare. Those with ILR have a right to live, work, and study in the country with no time limits. Significantly, ILR serves as the main pathway to obtaining British citizenship. The extension is aimed at low and medium-skilled workers, including care workers.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I want those carers to know: we appreciate you, we appreciate what you are doing to support people here,” said Prime Minister Burnham, referring to “many people from other countries” working in the care sector.
🎯 IMPACT: While supporters of the exemption have argued that it could address staffing shortages in the social care sector, critics have noted that it is likely to significantly suppress wages and jeopardize carer quality. Critics further note that the long-term costs of importing foreign care workers are high. It is estimated that every foreign care worker and their dependents cost the British taxpayer over £100,000 (~$134,311). The most common nationalities among these workers include Nigerians (29 percent), Indians (17 percent), and Zimbabweans (nine percent). Due to its far-reaching fiscal and social ramifications, Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party unveiled plans to reverse the Boriswave back in September last year.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The British government under new leader Andy Burnham is considering exempting foreign care workers from proposed changes to permanent residency.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.