Former President Donald Trump is taking digital broadcaster ABC News and its anchor, George Stephanopoulos, to court on defamation charges following an interview with Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC). During this interview, Stephanopoulos repeatedly said Trump was “found liable for rape” in the case of E. Jean Carroll, despite the official ruling characterizing the events as ‘sexual abuse.’
Trump’s lawsuit asserts that Stephanopoulos and ABC knowingly disseminated false information during the show, “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” mischaracterizing court verdicts and thereby damaging Trump’s public standing. The lawsuit focuses on the differentiation between legal definitions of ‘rape’ and ‘sexual abuse,’ challenging Stephanopoulos’s frequent usage of ‘rape’ to describe Trump’s alleged actions.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
The discussion between Stephanopoulos and Mace became heated when the allegations against Trump were raised. Stephanopoulos repeatedly questioned Mace about her support for Trump, given her experience as a survivor of sexual assault. Stephanopoulos’s persistent characterization of the verdict as a ‘rape’ conviction, despite Mace’s reminders of its actual categorization as ‘sexual abuse,’ will now be scrutinized in court.
The lawsuit is part of an ongoing legal battle surrounding Trump’s interaction with Carroll, with the case being poised for appeal within the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. As it stands, Trump’s team vehemently refutes the charges of defamation, rendering this development the latest chapter in the controversy enveloping Trump’s alleged misconduct.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump criticized Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) in a Truth Social post, accusing her of having known about widespread social services fraud schemes linked to Minnesota’s Somali community and claiming she should face legal consequences or be sent back to Somalia.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Rep. Omar, and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D).
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Trump’s remarks were posted on Truth Social on Sunday night, January 18, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “She should be in jail, or even a worse punishment, sent back to Somalia, considered one of the absolutely worst countries in the World,” Trump wrote.
🎯IMPACT: The remarks have sparked renewed controversy over Omar’s Somali background and her criticism of the U.S., especially amid the ongoing fraud investigations in Minnesota.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump, in a Truth Social post on Sunday night, accused Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) of being complicit in what he called “19 Billion Dollars in Minnesota Somalia Fraud.” Trump wrote, “Fake ‘Congresswoman’ Illhan Omar, a constant complainer who hates the USA, knows everything there is to know. She should be in jail, or even a worse punishment, sent back to Somalia, considered one of the absolutely worst countries in the World.”
Omar, who has served in the U.S. House of Representatives since 2019, was born in Somalia and became a U.S. citizen in 2000. Notably, her father served in the Somali military under the country’s former dictator, Siad Barre, whose government fell in 1991 after decades of rights abuses, corruption, and the infamous Isaaq genocide. Rep. Omar is also accused of having committed visa fraud by engaging in a sham marriage with her brother.
Trump also blasted Minnesota’s opposition to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offers in the state, writing, “ICE is removing some of the most violent criminals in the World from our Country, and bring them back home, where they belong. Why is Minnesota fighting this? Do they really want murderers and drug dealers to be ensconced in their community?”
The President further accused Omar and Governor Tim Walz (D-MN) of using protests against ICE to distract from what he alleged was massive fraud in the state. “The crooked Governor and ‘Congresswoman’ Omar, who married her brother, don’t mind because it keeps the focus of attention off the 18 Billion Dollar, Plus, FRAUD, that has taken place in the State! Don’t worry, we’re on it!” he added.
The controversy follows Omar’s recent tirade against the U.S., where she referred to the country negatively as the “U.S. Goddamn States.” This comment drew sharp backlash from Republican lawmakers, including Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), who questioned, “What should be the consequence of saying that?” Billionaire space and technology mogul Elon Musk responded, “Whatever the penalty is for treason.”
.@IlhanMN refers to our great country as the “U.S. G*ddamn States.”
There is no circumstance in which she should refer to our country in this way. It is beyond disrespectful — it is appalling, disgusting, and SICK. SHAME ON HER! pic.twitter.com/NYrTG8NFxm
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Students living alongside asylum seekers at Stek Oost in the Netherlands reported years of sexual assaults, violence, and harassment, according to an investigation.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Students, migrants, local authorities, and Stadgenoot, the housing association managing Stek Oost.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Stek Oost in Amsterdam, the Netherlands; attacks reported from its opening in 2018 to present.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We were completely overwhelmed. We no longer wanted to be responsible for the safety of the complex.” – Mariëlle Foppen, Stadgenoot representative.
🎯IMPACT: Stek Oost is set to close by 2028, with reports of ongoing safety issues continuing to affect students and staff.
IN FULL
An investigation has found that Dutch students living at the Stek Oost housing complex in Amsterdam endured years of sexual assault, intimidation, and violence while sharing accommodation with migrants under a government-backed integration initiative. Stek Oost opened in 2018 with 125 students and 125 asylum seekers living side by side. The project promoted a “buddy” system intended to help migrants integrate into Dutch society.
Former residents told the investigative television program Zembla that instead of fostering safety and cooperation, the arrangement exposed students to repeated harassment, stalking, and violent and sexual crime.
One former resident, identified as Amanda, said she was raped in 2019 by a Syrian migrant after he invited her to his room to watch a movie. She reported the incident to police, but the case was dropped due to insufficient evidence. The same man was arrested in 2022 and later convicted of raping two residents of the complex. He received a short three-year prison sentence in 2024. Students also reported other violent incidents, including a case in which a man said he was threatened with an eight-inch kitchen knife by a migrant.
Residents said they repeatedly raised concerns with authorities but felt their complaints were not taken seriously. Police confirmed receiving seven reports of sexual assault connected to Stek Oost, though they claim they have no record of a reported gang rape mentioned by students interviewed for a documentary about the site.
Stadgenoot, the housing association managing the complex, sought to close Stek Oost as early as 2023, citing ongoing safety risks. Local authorities initially opposed shutting it down, but the project is now scheduled to end in 2028 when its contract expires. Stadgenoot representative Mariëlle Foppen described the strain on staff, saying, “We were completely overwhelmed. We no longer wanted to be responsible for the safety of the complex.”
The revelations have renewed debate over migrant integration failures, coming amid wider scrutiny of migrant-linked sexual violence across Europe. Recent criminal cases and official statistics in several European countries have highlighted the disproportionate involvement of recently arrived migrants in serious sexual offences. However, in some instances, populist politicians have faced penalties for publicly citing government crime data related to migrant rape statistics.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Airlines may see cost savings on fuel if weight loss drugs contribute to lighter passengers, according to a Jefferies Research Services analysis.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Jefferies Research Services, major U.S. airlines including American, Delta, Southwest, and United, and weight loss drug manufacturers.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The analysis comes as weight loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy gain popularity in the United States.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Airlines have a long history of searching for unique methods to reduce the weight of the aircraft, in turn reducing fuel consumption and limiting an airline’s largest cost bucket,” analysts said in the report.
🎯IMPACT: A 10 percent slimmer society could lead to $580 million in annual fuel savings for the top four U.S. carriers.
IN FULL
Airlines could benefit financially if weight loss medications lead to lighter passengers, as fuel costs are directly tied to the weight of an aircraft. Jefferies Research Services—a global research, macro strategy, and equity insights firm that advises major investors—recently analyzed the potential savings and found that slimmer passengers could reduce fuel consumption and boost airline earnings.
The analysis notes that a 10 percent reduction in average passenger weight could lower total airline passenger weight by two percent, resulting in a 1.5 percent reduction in fuel costs and a four percent increase in earnings per share. For the top four U.S. airlines—American, Delta, Southwest, and United—this could mean $580 million in annual fuel savings.
Using a Boeing 737 Max 8 as an example, Jefferies calculated that a 10 percent slimmer passenger base would decrease the aircraft’s takeoff weight from 181,200 pounds to 177,996 pounds. This weight reduction translates into significant savings, as airlines spend billions annually on jet fuel, and profits are often dependent on the companies meeting very slim margins.
“Airlines have a long history of searching for unique methods to reduce the weight of the aircraft, in turn reducing fuel consumption and limiting an airline’s largest cost bucket,” the report noted. While airlines can control many aspects of weight reduction, passenger weight has always been beyond their control.
The analysis comes as weight loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy gain popularity and become more widely accessible. “With the drug now available in pill form and obesity rates falling, broader usage could have further implications for waistlines,” the analysis notes regarding the widespread availability of GLP-1 drugs. The National Pulse reported in November of last year that President Donald J. Trump cut a deal to bring down prices for select weight loss medications. “This is a triumph for American patients that will save lives and improve the health of millions and millions of Americans,” he said during an Oval Office announcement.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump reiterated the need for “total” U.S. control over Greenland in a message to the Prime Minister of Norway.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, and various NATO figures.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The text exchange occurred recently, with follow-up meetings planned between NATO and Danish officials.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.” – President Trump
🎯IMPACT: Trump’s statements have intensified debate over U.S. foreign policy under Trump and the NATO alliance.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump has reiterated his strong desire for the United States to gain “complete and total control” of Greenland, arguing that global security depends on it in a message to the Prime Minister of Norway, Jonas Gahr Støre. “Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway?” he demanded, adding: “There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also.”
“I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States,” he continued, concluding: “The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”
Earlier in the message, the U.S. leader had warned, “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.” Prime Minister Støre subsequently complained that an independent committee awards Nobel Prizes, not the Norwegian government.
Støre confirmed receiving the message on Sunday, describing it as a reply to an earlier joint outreach from him and Finnish President Alexander Stubb after they had urged de-escalation amid the Greenland dispute. This followed Trump having threatened to impose a 10 percent tariff on goods from eight NATO allies—including Denmark, Norway, and others—starting February 1, with potential increases to 25 percent by June, unless progress is made toward U.S. acquisition of Greenland.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Andrew Rosindell, a long-time Tory, defected to the Reform Party.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Andrew Rosindell MP, Nigel Farage, and the Reform Party.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The defection was announced on Sunday, shortly after Robert Jenrick’s defection earlier in the week.
💬KEY QUOTE: Rosindell expressed his objections to Tory policy and leadership in a tweet.
🎯IMPACT: Rosindell’s move makes him the 7th MP to join Reform, with Farage setting a May deadline for further defections.
IN FULL
Following Robert Jenrick MP’s defection from the UK Conservative Party to the Reform Party earlier this week, Andrew Rosindell has also switched allegiances.
Rosindell, who has been a member of the Conservative Party since he was 14, cited his discontent with the party’s policies and leadership as reasons for his departure. He made his views known in a tweet on Sunday.
This makes Rosindell the 7th MP to join the Reform Party, which is led by Nigel Farage. Farage has issued a deadline in May for any further defections, including those from MPs and local councillors.
This evening, with sorrow, I have decided to resign from my position as an Opposition Shadow Minister and as a member of the Conservative & Unionist Party.
Since joining the Conservative Party at the age of 14, I have been a loyal and committed supporter of the principles… pic.twitter.com/hbOSPRezCw
— Andrew Rosindell MP 🇬🇧🏴 (@AndrewRosindell) January 18, 2026
The move signals another shift in the UK political landscape, as the Reform Party continues to expand its influence and challenge the political establishment.
Rosindell’s decision to join Reform underscores ongoing dissatisfaction within the Conservative Party, potentially leading to more changes in the coming months.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Data from the British Transport Police (BTP) revealed that foreign nationals accounted for 79 percent of all arrests for theft on British trains in 2025, and 40 percent of all railway arrests overall.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: British Transport Police, the Centre for Migration Control (CMC) think tank, and foreign nationals involved in various offenses.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Data pertains to arrests across England, Wales, and Scotland in 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “They have made our trains unsafe. It is the responsibility of any sane government to end immigration and begin a programme of mass deportations to protect the British people,” said Robert Bates, research director at CMC.
🎯IMPACT: The data has prompted calls for stricter immigration policies, with recommendations for immediate deportations of foreign nationals convicted of crimes.
IN FULL
Foreign nationals accounted for a large share of arrests on Britain’s rail network in 2025, according to figures released by the British Transport Police (BTP) following a Freedom of Information request from the Centre for Migration Control (CMC). The data shows that foreign nationals were responsible for 79 percent of all theft arrests on British trains and 40 percent of arrests overall across the railway system.
The CMC said the figures also point to disproportionate involvement by foreign nationals in other serious crimes on the rail network. According to the group’s analysis, foreign nationals made up 40 percent of arrests for drug-related offenses, 37 percent of arrests for sexual offenses, and 36 percent of arrests for violent crime. Overall, they accounted for 37.7 percent of all railway arrests. “We have imported a huge problem,” the CMC said in a post on X.
CMC research director Robert Bates blamed government immigration policy for the trend. “They have made our trains unsafe. It is the responsibility of any sane government to end immigration and begin a programme of mass deportations to protect the British people,” he said. The CMC has also called for the introduction of a visa “red list” barring entry from certain countries whose nations have high rates of criminality, similar to policies implemented by President Donald J. Trump, and for legal changes to ensure foreign nationals convicted of crimes are deported immediately.
The railway data aligns with broader crime statistics that have fueled debate over immigration and public safety. Recent analyses of conviction records indicate that migrants were significantly overrepresented in sexual offense convictions compared with Britons, with foreign nationals estimated to be around 70 percent more likely to be convicted of sex crimes during the early 2020s.
Concerns have also been raised about enforcement, with reports suggesting that staffing shortages and administrative pressures have led to some foreign criminals being wrongly released rather than removed from the country.
Similar patterns have been reported elsewhere in Western Europe. In France, foreigners were responsible for 64 percent of violent crimes on Paris public transport in 2024, with North Africans disproportionately represented. In Germany, foreigners accounted for 59 percent of sexual crimes committed on trains and at train stations in 2024.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Trump announced tariffs on countries obstructing the U.S. purchase of Greenland.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Donald J. Trump and countries including Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Tariffs to begin on February 1st, 2026, with an increase on June 1st, 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We have subsidized Denmark, and all of the Countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them Tariffs.” – Donald J. Trump
🎯IMPACT: Tariffs aimed at compelling a deal for the U.S. purchase of Greenland, citing national security concerns.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump has announced new tariffs on several European countries, including Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland. These tariffs are in response to these nations’ obstruction of the United States’ efforts to purchase Greenland.
The tariffs will start at 10% on February 1st, 2026, and will increase to 25% on June 1st, 2026. Trump argues that these tariffs are necessary to protect global peace and security, as the strategic importance of Greenland is paramount.
“We have subsidized Denmark, and all of the Countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them Tariffs, or any other forms of remuneration,” Trump stated, emphasizing the need for Denmark to “give back” as world peace is at stake.
The former president also highlighted concerns over other nations, such as China and Russia, expressing interest in Greenland, asserting that only the United States can effectively safeguard this “sacred piece of Land.”
Trump’s statement also mentioned the significant investment in security programs related to “The Golden Dome,” and how acquiring Greenland is crucial for maximizing the potential of these systems. The U.S. remains open to negotiation with Denmark and the other involved nations.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Abortion numbers reached a record high in 2023, with an estimated 299,614 abortions taking place across Britain.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Department of Health and Social Care, Right To Life UK, and British abortionists.
📍WHEN & WHERE: 2023, United Kingdom.
💬KEY QUOTE: “It is a national tragedy and a national scandal that so many lives were lost to abortion in England and Wales in 2023.” – Catherine Robinson
🎯IMPACT: The figures have prompted calls for a national conversation about abortion laws, and renewed pressure for the British government to release the figures for more recent years, which they have been delaying.
IN FULL
Britain recorded its highest number of abortions in 2023, with an estimated 299,614 procedures carried out across the country, according to official figures. Data released by the Department of Health and Social Care show that 278,740 abortions took place in England and Wales, an increase of 10.56 percent compared with the previous year. Scotland reported 18,242 abortions, while Northern Ireland recorded an estimated 2,632, bringing the total to a new national high.
The increase came during the third consecutive year in which at-home abortion services have been widely available in England and Wales. These services, introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, allow women to receive abortion pills following a remote consultation, rather than attending a clinic in person. Supporters argue the model improves access to care, while critics say it reduces medical oversight and safeguards, and allows people to acquire abortifacients without the consent of the expectant mother.
Right To Life UK has responded to the figures by calling for a nationwide discussion on abortion law and policy. The group has emphasized the need for stronger protections for unborn children alongside expanded practical and financial support for women facing unplanned pregnancies. Polling cited by the organization suggests that a majority of women support changes to current abortion regulations, including the reinstatement of mandatory in-person consultations.
Catherine Robinson, a spokeswoman for Right To Life UK, said, “It is a national tragedy and a national scandal that so many lives were lost to abortion in England and Wales in 2023.” Pro-life organizations stress that figures for more recent years are unavailable because the British government is delaying their release, suspecting they show abortions have increased even more since 2023.
The British debate is unfolding amid wider international controversy over abortion. In Canada, undercover footage released has reignited criticism from pro-life groups by showing how easily late-term abortions can be accessed. The United States appears to be the only Anglo-Sphere country countering the growing abortion trend. President Donald J. Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill, introduced last year, has led to the closure of several abortion-providing clinics by restricting public funding.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Chinese President Xi Jinping have agreed to a majortrade deal, which could flood the Canadian market with Chinese electric vehicles, while reducing tariffs on Canadian goods exported to China.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Prime Minister Mark Carney, President Xi Jinping, Ontario Premier Doug Ford, and Canadian farmers.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The preliminary deal was announced on January 16, following talks between Carney and Xi in Beijing.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Make no mistake: China now has a foothold in the Canadian market and will use it to their full advantage at the expense of Canadian workers.” – Doug Ford.
🎯IMPACT: The agreement is a major reset of Canadian-Chinese relations and could further complicate a potential Canadian trade deal with the United States.
IN FULL
Canada is moving to deepen economic ties with Communist China after fumbling trade negotiations with the United States late last year, marking a notable shift in Ottawa’s foreign and trade policy. During a visit to Beijing this week, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a preliminary trade agreement with China that lowers barriers on both sides.
Under the deal, Canada will allow China to flood the Canadian market with up to 49,000 Chinese-made electric vehicles each year at a tariff of 6.1 per cent, a huge reduction from the 100 per cent duty previously imposed. In exchange, China will reduce tariffs on Canadian agricultural exports, including canola seed oil, which will fall to about 15 per cent by March, down from levels exceeding 80 per cent. Duties on canola meal, lobster, crab, and peas will also be lifted for the remainder of the year.
Carney claimed the agreement is a pragmatic step to support Canadian farmers and consumers while diversifying the country’s trade relationships. He said the deal would help restore access to a key export market for agriculture and could make lower-cost electric vehicles more available to Canadians.
However, the agreement comes as Canada’s economic relationship with the United States has grown increasingly unstable. Last year, Carney and Trump held talks at the White House that appeared to bring the two countries closer to a new trade deal, with both sides publicly expressing optimism. However, those discussions later broke down. In October, Trump abruptly halted trade negotiations with Canada, citing anger over a provincial anti-tariff advertising campaign in Ontario produced and paid for by Premier Doug Ford that targeted U.S. trade measures using edited, misleading footage of former President Ronald Reagan. Trump accused Canada of acting in bad faith.
Ford also commented on the new China deal, saying, “Make no mistake: China now has a foothold in the Canadian market and will use it to their full advantage at the expense of Canadian workers.” Some industry leaders and provincial officials have also raised concerns that opening the door to Chinese electric vehicles could further complicate relations with Washington.
The collapse of negotiations with Washington has heightened concerns in Ottawa about Canada’s heavy reliance on the U.S. market, which absorbs roughly three-quarters of Canadian exports. Against that backdrop, the agreement with China represents the most significant reset in relations between Ottawa and Beijing in years. Trade ties had deteriorated following earlier disputes and retaliatory tariffs, particularly in agriculture. Canadian canola exports to China were among the hardest hit, costing farmers billions of dollars in lost sales.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson (D) was fined $250 for failing to disclose over $10,000 in contributions from her parents during her campaign.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, her parents, and the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The fine was issued following her November election victory in Seattle.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Seattle is one of the most expensive cities in the country… I think that a lot of people of my generation… found it very relatable that during this stressful campaign my parents chipped in to help pay for the cost of their granddaughter’s daycare.” – Katie Wilson
🎯IMPACT: The case highlighted potential loopholes in campaign finance laws and resulted in a small fine.
IN FULL
Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson (D) was fined $250 by the City of Seattle’s Ethics and Elections Commission after failing to disclose more than $10,000 in financial support from her parents during her mayoral campaign. The commission ruled that the money constituted campaign contributions, even though Wilson said the funds were used to pay for daycare expenses, and required corrective action to bring the campaign into compliance with city election laws.
According to the commission, the penalty was kept low because the issue had not previously arisen in a Seattle municipal campaign. Commission representative Jessica Pisane said, “It’s the first time it has arisen in a City election campaign.”
Following her victory in November, Wilson defended the assistance she received from her parents, saying, “Seattle is one of the most expensive cities in the country, our childcare is off-the-charts expensive and, honestly, I think that a lot of people of my generation, and younger and older, found it very relatable that during this stressful campaign my parents chipped in to help pay for the cost of their granddaughter’s daycare.”
Before entering city politics, Wilson founded the Transit Riders Union. Financial disclosures filed during her campaign showed that she earned between $60,000 and $99,000 annually prior to running for mayor. She also reported additional income from writing as a columnist for left-leaning publications.
Since taking office, Wilson has drawn criticism over several progressive policy positions. She has faced backlash related to public safety after reports that Seattle police officers were being directed to divert many drug abusers away from arrest and toward social service programs, a move critics argue amounts to de facto non-enforcement of drug laws. Wilson’s administration has denied that officers have been told not to make arrests, but the issue has fueled tension with police unions and public safety advocates.
Wilson has also come under national scrutiny following comments about independent journalists reporting on childcare providers in Seattle. After she characterized certain citizen journalists as engaging in harassment, a senior U.S. Justice Department official publicly warned that citizen journalism and asking questions are protected speech under the Constitution.
During her campaign, Wilson supported proposals such as defunding the police and exploring government-run grocery stores, drawing comparisons to other socialist politicians like New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
_Seattle_Transit_Riders_Union%27s_Rally_to_Ride_Katie_Wilson.jpg){kind=link}
