Thursday, October 16, 2025

REPORT: Feds Gave Billions to International Advertiser Group Censoring Conservatives.

A new report reveals the Biden-Harris government has funneled billions of dollars to an international group that has demanded the censorship of conservative voices on social media. According to the evidence released by the Foundation for Freedom Online, the U.S. federal government has underwritten—using taxpayer dollars—the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), which has actively pushed for the censorship of right-leaning media since 2019.

GARM was created as an initiative of the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), which controls roughly 90 percent of advertiser spending worldwide. Four advertising agencies—IPG, Omnicom, WPP, and the Publicis Groupe—are responsible for GARM’s push for censorship. It is also through these agencies that GARM has been funneled U.S. taxpayer dollars.

IPG holds over $1.5 billion in government contracts with the Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Defense (DOD). Omnicom holds roughly $5 billion in contracts with the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Meanwhile, WPP has earned $455 million from work done with the U.S. Navy. Additionally, Publicis Groupe has a $394.2 million contract with HHS.

GARM’S CENSORSHIP CAMPAIGN.

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee produced a report on Thursday detailing how GARM harnessed its control over Internet advertising revenue to pressure social media platforms—like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook—to censor dissident speech and voices on the political right. In the case of X, GARM members claim they were able to severely impact advertiser money that the company’s earnings came in 80 percent below projections.

Another GARM target has been Spotify. The group pressured the podcast and music platform to drop its biggest subscriber draw, Joe Rogan, over various comments the entertainer has made, especially criticism of government policies regarding COVID-19. GARM targeted Spotify advertisers like Coca-Cola, warning the company that Rogan and his comments were “a major area of concern.”

In addition to targeting social media platforms, GARM has also targeted right-leaning media directly. The group has tried to drive advertisers away from news websites like Breitbart and The Daily Wire. This campaign appears to have been coordinated with the global censorship group NewsGuard.

show less
A new report reveals the Biden-Harris government has funneled billions of dollars to an international group that has demanded the censorship of conservative voices on social media. According to the evidence released by the Foundation for Freedom Online, the U.S. federal government has underwritten—using taxpayer dollars—the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), which has actively pushed for the censorship of right-leaning media since 2019. show more

Professor Wins $2.4M Settlement After Criticizing DEI.

A professor from Bakersfield College has reached a $2.4 million settlement following a legal dispute concerning his questioning of grant funds used for social justice initiatives at the institution. Matthew Garrett, who was a tenured history professor at the California community college, will receive a total of $2,245,480 broken out in monthly payments over the next 20 years and an immediate lump sum of $154,520 as back pay and medical benefits, according to the settlement agreement dated July 10.

As part of the settlement, Garrett has resigned from his position within the Kern Community College District, which includes Bakersfield College, among several other schools. Additionally, the district has agreed to withdraw and seal all accusations of “unprofessional conduct” against him.

Garrett declined to discuss the specifics of the settlement but commented on the events leading up to it. “After five years of administrative misconduct, a decisive courtroom display exonerated me of all allegations and exposed that Kern Community College District engaged in flagrant retaliation for my questioning of partisan policies and wasteful expenditures,” he stated in a recent interview. Facing a likely adverse ruling and potential multimillion-dollar damages, the district opted for a settlement, he explained.

The conflict dates back to at least 2019, when Garrett defended free speech on campus and criticized grant funds earmarked for social justice agendas. Accusations of fiscal impropriety led to administrative action against him. In 2021, Garrett and colleague Professor Erin Miller, who faced similar accusations, filed a federal lawsuit alleging violations of their civil and First Amendment rights and academic freedom by the college district.

Garrett noted that despite the resolution of his case, Miller continues to face retaliatory actions, including class cancellations. Garrett has decided to withdraw from the shared federal lawsuit to allow Miller to pursue her claims independently.

show less
A professor from Bakersfield College has reached a $2.4 million settlement following a legal dispute concerning his questioning of grant funds used for social justice initiatives at the institution. Matthew Garrett, who was a tenured history professor at the California community college, will receive a total of $2,245,480 broken out in monthly payments over the next 20 years and an immediate lump sum of $154,520 as back pay and medical benefits, according to the settlement agreement dated July 10. show more

Facebook Admits Wrongfully Censoring Iconic Trump Assassination Attempt Photo.

Facebook has admitted to wrongfully censoring an iconic photograph of former President Donald J. Trump moments after the July 13 attempt on his life. The image, captured by an Associated Press photographer, depicts Trump with a bloodied face and raised fist, with the American flag flying behind him. Facebook fact-checkers had been flagging the photo, claiming it was altered.

Facebook contends the censorship was supposed to target a manipulated version of the image, which falsely showed Secret Service agents smiling as they surrounded Trump. However, the original, authentic photograph was also censored.

Meta, Facebook’s parent company, acknowledged the supposed mistake following public backlash. Communications Director Dani Lever stated, “This was an error. This fact check was initially applied to a doctored photo showing the Secret Service agents smiling, and in some cases, our systems incorrectly applied that fact check to the real photo. This has been fixed and we apologize for the mistake.”

Facebook uses third-party fact-checkers and artificial intelligence (AI) software to monitor and control content on its platform. According to Meta, AI is used “to scale the work of fact-checkers by applying warning labels to duplicates of false claims and reducing their distribution.”

Meta and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has engaged in extensive election interference in the U.S., mostly through the funding of the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). Meanwhile, a report issued in April found that Facebook has directly interfered with and attempted to influence American elections 39 times since 2008.

In March, The National Pulse reported that an AI system deployed in Washington state erroneously flagged factually true stories as misinformation.

show less
Facebook has admitted to wrongfully censoring an iconic photograph of former President Donald J. Trump moments after the July 13 attempt on his life. The image, captured by an Associated Press photographer, depicts Trump with a bloodied face and raised fist, with the American flag flying behind him. Facebook fact-checkers had been flagging the photo, claiming it was altered. show more
germany

Government Bans Pro-Trump Magazine for Criticizing Multiculturalism.

Germany’s Interior Minister Nancy Faeser has unilaterally banned the right-wing, pro-Donald J. Trump Compact Magazin, accusing the publication of fostering “hatred” of migrants and ethnic diversity. “The ban shows that we are also taking action against the intellectual arsonists who stir up a climate of hatred and violence against refugees and migrants and want to overcome our democratic state,” Minister Faeser said.

“Our signal is very clear: We will not allow ethnic definitions of who belongs to Germany and who does not,” she added.

Several people associated with the magazine, including publisher Jürgen Elsässer, had their homes raided following the ban on July 16. Police also seized the magazine’s assets.

Compact is well-known for its links to the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which lawmakers in Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, are also trying to get banned. The magazine is also noted for being skeptical of Western involvement in the Ukraine war, blaming NATO expansion for the conflict.

Brandenburg state interior minister Michael Stübgen, a member of the so-called “center-right” Christian Democratic Union (CDU) formerly led by Angela Merkel, has said all of Compact‘s social media channels will be scrubbed from the Internet, with their content deleted and revenue confiscated.

Earlier this year, Minister Faeser, who previously wrote for far-left Antifa publications, announced the government would be banning anyone declared a far-right extremist from owning firearms. The government will also trace people who donate to allegedly far-right individuals and groups.

show less
Germany's Interior Minister Nancy Faeser has unilaterally banned the right-wing, pro-Donald J. Trump Compact Magazin, accusing the publication of fostering "hatred" of migrants and ethnic diversity. "The ban shows that we are also taking action against the intellectual arsonists who stir up a climate of hatred and violence against refugees and migrants and want to overcome our democratic state," Minister Faeser said. show more

Missouri AG Files SCOTUS Legal Challenge Against Trump NY Case.

Attorney General Andrew Bailey of Missouri has initiated legal action against the State of New York, alleging that its handling of former President Donald Trump’s so-called hush money trial infringed on the First Amendment rights of Missouri residents.

Bailey contends that the legal proceedings and the associated gag orders imposed on Trump restrain the former president from speaking freely during his 2024 reelection campaign, thereby affecting the rights of Missourians to hear him.

The lawsuit petitions the Supreme Court and requests a declaration that New York unlawfully interfered with the presidential election process. Additionally, it seeks to postpone Trump’s upcoming sentencing until after the conclusion of the November election. Finally, it demands the removal of any gag orders against Trump.

Trump’s sentencing in the case was already delayed until September following a motion by Trump’s attorneys that was not opposed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg earlier this week. The motion argues the recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity invalidates the New York conviction.

Bailey argues the requested measures are critical to ensuring that Missourians have unimpeded access to Trump’s viewpoints as they make their decisions in the forthcoming election. According to the lawsuit, the restrictions on Trump’s speech represent a significant overreach and censorship that deprives the public of critical information.

New York’s response to the lawsuit has not yet been publicly disclosed. Observers suggest the case could set a precedent regarding the extent to which legal actions can impact political campaigns and voters’ rights to access unfiltered communications from candidates.

The Supreme Court’s response to Bailey’s petition will be closely watched for its implications on future interactions between state law enforcement actions and federal electoral processes.

show less
Attorney General Andrew Bailey of Missouri has initiated legal action against the State of New York, alleging that its handling of former President Donald Trump's so-called hush money trial infringed on the First Amendment rights of Missouri residents. show more

The Supreme Court Shunned the First Amendment Today. Sad!

The United States Supreme Court has ruled in a six-to-three decision that the plaintiffs in Murthy v. Missouri lack standing to sue the Biden government over the latter’s pressuring Big Tech companies to censor American citizens for speech they determined to be “misinformation.” Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett declared that the District Court and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’s decisions issuing an injunction barring the Biden government from communicating with social media platforms is to be lifted.

Additionally, Barrett and the court‘s majority—comprised of Justices Roberts, Kavanaugh, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson—ruled that the case should be remanded back to the Fifth Circuit with the specific instructions that the plaintiffs lack standing under Article III of the Constitution. Meanwhile, a District Court and the Fifth Circuit had previously held that the lawsuit could proceed under Article III.

Murthy v. Missouri stems from a series of lawsuits by several U.S. states and a handful of social media users. The plaintiffs allege various agencies and officials in the Biden government violated Americans’ First Amendment free speech rights by pressuring social media platforms to remove content they deemed “to be false or misleading.”

The Supreme Court examined the Biden government’s communications with tech companies, specifically those involving the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election. Justice Barrett states, ” And while the record reflects that the Government defendants played a role in at least some of the platforms’ moderation choices, the evidence indicates that the platforms had independent incentives to moderate content and often exercised their own judgment.”

From this determination, the court held that the plaintiffs could not demonstrate “their ‘direct censorship injuries'” and could not satisfy the requirements for Article III standing.

show less
The United States Supreme Court has ruled in a six-to-three decision that the plaintiffs in Murthy v. Missouri lack standing to sue the Biden government over the latter's pressuring Big Tech companies to censor American citizens for speech they determined to be "misinformation." Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett declared that the District Court and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals's decisions issuing an injunction barring the Biden government from communicating with social media platforms is to be lifted. show more

Tommy Robinson Arrested in Canada.

Plainclothes officers in Alberta, Canada, have arrested independent journalist and anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson shortly after he finished delivering a speech against mass migration in Calgary. He delivered a defiant “F**k Justin Trudeau” as he was forced into a police car in handcuffs.

Robinson shot a covert video in the police car after his arrest, asking who had ordered it. Officers informed him that it had been authorized by “the minister’s delegate”—referring to a minister in Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s far-left government.

Robinson has now been released, but the Trudeau regime is ordering him to turn in his passport and remain in southern Alberta until a hearing is arranged. He says he has not been told why the state is pursuing him beyond “immigration violations.”

His release conditions prevent him not only from returning home but from delivering planned speeches in Edmonton and Toronto.

The British government is also pursuing Robinson. The Attorney General’s Office–run by a Conservative Member of Parliament (MP)–is moving a case against him for alleged contempt of court related to a defamation settlement. The far-left HOPE Not Hate organization funded by George Soros is the instigator in the case, having presented the Attorney General’s Office with a dossier of supposed evidence against Robinson.

This follows a failed attempt by London’s Metropolitan Police to prosecute Robinson for failing to comply with a dispersal order. The force had pepper-sprayed and forcibly ejected Robinson from a march against anti-Semitism, claiming his mere presence was causing “alarm and distress.” A judge ruled the order was not lawful.

show less
Plainclothes officers in Alberta, Canada, have arrested independent journalist and anti-grooming gangs activist Tommy Robinson shortly after he finished delivering a speech against mass migration in Calgary. He delivered a defiant "F**k Justin Trudeau" as he was forced into a police car in handcuffs. show more

FREE AT LAST: WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Flies Out of UK After U.S. Plea Deal.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange left the United Kingdom on Monday after securing bail from England’s High Court, following extended negotiations with U.S. authorities. U.S. Justice Department court documents show Assange will appear in federal court to plead guilty to an Espionage Act charge related to conspiring to obtain and release classified national defense information unlawfully.

Assange was responsible for the release of numerous classified documents concerning the Afghanistan and Iraq wars and Hillary Clinton’s infamous emails. Following his plea and sentencing, scheduled for Wednesday in the Mariana Islands, a U.S. commonwealth in the Western Pacific, Assange will return to his native Australia.

Prosecutors are accepting a five-year sentence inclusive of time spent in British custody, meaning Assange should walk free immediately after sentencing.

On Monday, a plane carrying Assange departed England, refueling in Thailand around noon local time (6 AM BST) on Tuesday. Assange had been held in England’s Belmarsh Prison, known for housing jihadists and dangerous killers, for 1,901 days. Prior to that, he spent seven years in the Ecuadorean Embassy until his expulsion following a change in Ecuador’s government.

The official WikiLeaks account and Assange’s family expressed deep gratitude to supporters. On X, Assange’s wife, Stella, celebrated his freedom and thanked those who supported their campaign. Assange’s mother, Christine, also expressed gratitude, revealing the profound personal toll the 14-year ordeal has taken.

show less
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange left the United Kingdom on Monday after securing bail from England's High Court, following extended negotiations with U.S. authorities. U.S. Justice Department court documents show Assange will appear in federal court to plead guilty to an Espionage Act charge related to conspiring to obtain and release classified national defense information unlawfully. show more

Congress Subpoenas State Dept For Censoring Americans.

The State Department has received a congressional subpoena regarding records on programs alleged by Republicans to foster “censorship-by-proxy and revenue interference of American small businesses.” Issued by the House Small Business Committee late last Thursday, the subpoena targets documents and communications from the State Department’s Global Engagement Center (GEC).

Beginning over a year ago, the House Small Business Committee’s inquiry into the GEC has focused on the State Department agency’s grant-making authority. Among these grants is a $100,000 disbursement to the London-based Global Disinformation Index (GDI). An affiliated nonprofit of GDI is registered in the United States, and it works to convince advertisers to avoid right-leaning media outlets.

The committee’s scrutiny of the GEC resulted in legislation last year preventing the Pentagon from funding groups like GDI. Subsequently, the Federalist and the Daily Wire, both right-leaning media, filed a lawsuit against the Biden government. Their complaint alleges the government supported one of the worst censorship initiatives in American history. Both Microsoft and Oracle cut ties with GDI earlier this year following backlash against the censorship group’s activities.

Led by Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX), the committee is requesting detailed financial documents from the GEC, including unredacted lists of grant recipients since 2019 and records of awards to entities like GDI and New York-based NewsGuard. However, the committee only received heavily redacted, nonpublic documents labeled as “sensitive but unclassified,” sparking accusations of obstruction from the Republicans.

A document from February 14, 2023, titled “GEC-GDI-BLACKLIST,” is believed to contain pivotal information for the committee. The subpoena specifies records pertaining to GEC funding awards since 2018 to nearly two dozen organizations, including GDI, NewsGuard, and Park Advisors. Additionally, Republicans requested information related to the Atlantic Council‘s lab and Albany Associates.

show less
The State Department has received a congressional subpoena regarding records on programs alleged by Republicans to foster "censorship-by-proxy and revenue interference of American small businesses." Issued by the House Small Business Committee late last Thursday, the subpoena targets documents and communications from the State Department's Global Engagement Center (GEC). show more

DEI Judge Demands Reporter Reveal Source for Trans Shooter Manifesto.

Michael Patrick Leahy, editor and owner of The Tennessee Star, is facing potential imprisonment if he does not reveal the source who leaked the manifesto of Audrey Hale, the Covenant School shooter. Davidson County Chancellor I’Ashea Myles – a local Nashville trial judge – scheduled Leahy for a “show cause hearing” on Monday, June 17, following his publication of the leaked documents.

Audrey Hale’s attack on March 27, 2023, resulted in the deaths of three children and three adults. The manifesto, described as being filled with anti-white and anti-Christian statements, was released despite efforts by federal and local officials to keep it confidential. Authorities cited the risk of it serving as a roadmap for future copycat incidents and the potential unintended consequences for vulnerable populations.

Leahy’s legal representation, First Amendment lawyer Daniel Horwitz, filed an emergency motion on Wednesday to stay the court order. Citing freedom of the press and state law violations, Horwitz argued that the “show cause order” violated Tennessee’s shield law and due process guarantees, among other constitutional concerns.

Horwitz pointed out that the order was vague and did not clearly specify the provisions Leahy may have violated, raising procedural issues regarding Leahy’s ability to mount an adequate defense. In his arguments, Horwitz emphasized protections under the First Amendment against prior restraint, asserting that any prohibition of publication would be unconstitutional.

Following Myles’ refusal to rescind her order, an additional mandate required a representative from Nashville’s government to appear in court. The judge rejected claims of First Amendment infringements and indicated further actions could involve appointing an attorney as amicus curiae to investigate and potentially prosecute any contempt citations related to the case.

Myles has an extremely active Instagram page showcasing her support for gay pride, Juneteenth, and far-left Supreme Court justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. She received a “Diversity Fellowship” between 2018 and 2021 and said upon her appointment to the court: “I am truly honored to have an opportunity, as a minority woman, to be the first to bring this diverse and inclusive perspective to our civil trial court bench in Nashville.”

show less
Michael Patrick Leahy, editor and owner of The Tennessee Star, is facing potential imprisonment if he does not reveal the source who leaked the manifesto of Audrey Hale, the Covenant School shooter. Davidson County Chancellor I'Ashea Myles – a local Nashville trial judge – scheduled Leahy for a "show cause hearing" on Monday, June 17, following his publication of the leaked documents. show more