Monday, November 2, 2026

Trump State Dept Endorses Deal That Trump Just Labeled ‘Act of Great Stupidity.’

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The U.S. State Department has endorsed the British government’s moves to surrender the British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Islands) to Mauritius, an ally of China, despite President Donald J. Trump previously calling it an “act of great stupidity” and the fact that it hosts a major British-American base.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs and representatives from the U.S. interagency, along with Mauritius.

📍WHEN & WHERE: February 2026, U.S.-Mauritius talks set to take place in Port Louis, Mauritius.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The United States supports the decision of the United Kingdom to proceed with its agreement with Mauritius concerning the Chagos archipelago.”  – U.S. State Department

🎯IMPACT: Britain will pay Mauritius large sums of money in order to continue leasing Diego Garcia, the Chagos island that hosts the British-American base, which it currently owns outright for free. However, Mauritius may undermine the base by leasing a neighboring island to China or altering the terms of the deal once its sovereignty is established.

IN FULL

The U.S. State Department has endorsed the British government’s moves to surrender the British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Islands) to Mauritius, an ally of China, despite President Donald J. Trump previously calling it an “act of great stupidity.” One of the islands, Diego Garcia, hosts a strategic British-American military base, and even though the British government intends to pay Mauritius huge sums to continue leasing it, it could be undermined if Mauritius leases a neighboring island to China or otherwise alters the deal once sovereignty is established.

“The United States supports the decision of the United Kingdom to proceed with its agreement with Mauritius concerning the Chagos archipelago,” the State Department said in a statement, announcing that “From February 23–25, the United States and Mauritius will hold discussions in Port Louis led by the Department of State’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, with participation from across the U.S. interagency.”

Last month, President Donald J. Trump said that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer “giving away extremely important land is an act of GREAT STUPIDITY,” as well as an “act of total weakness” that would embolden Russia and China. Longtime Trump ally and Reform Party leader Nigel Farage had lobbied the America First leader extensively on Chagos.

The circumstances surrounding the Chagos transfer are bizarre, with Britain effectively paying a country allied to an adversary nation to take its sovereign territory. Notably, Prime Minister Starmer’s negotiator on Chagos, Attorney General Richard Hermer, hates the British Empire and supports reparations, and worked alongside Philippe Sands, a British lawyer assisting Mauritius in its claims, for ten years. Sands is also a personal friend of Starmer.

Mauritius is more than 1,000 miles from Chagos, and has no Mauritian population, with the Chagossians—removed from the islands decades ago to make way for the Diego Garcia base—being near-universally opposed to the islands’ transfer to Mauritius.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Britain’s Far-Left Govt Tried to CANCEL Elections. Nigel Farage Just Stopped Them.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Government reversed its decision to postpone elections across 30 councils this May following a legal challenge.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Local Government Secretary Steve Reed, Reform UK led by Nigel Farage, and Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on Monday, with elections now scheduled for May 2026 across 30 councils in England.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We took this Labour government to court and won. Only Reform UK fights for democracy.” – Nigel Farage.

🎯IMPACT: The Government’s U-turn ensures elections will proceed as planned, with political parties reacting strongly to the reversal.

IN FULL

Britain’s far-left Labour Party government has dropped its controversial plan to delay elections for 30 local councils—municipal governments—this May, largely because a legal challenge by the anti-establishment party Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, threatened to block the postponement in court. Initially, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s government claimed that the reorganizations of local government in parts of England justified holding some elections a year later than scheduled, but Reform, which was projected to make significant gains against Labour, went to court, arguing this would deny millions of voters their democratic rights.

Starmer’s justice advisers admitted the postponement plan could be unlawful, prompting the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to say the elections will now go ahead as planned in May 2026 after all. Farage declared victory following the reversal, writing on X:  “We took this Labour government to court and won. In collusion with the Tories, Keir Starmer tried to stop 4.6 million people voting on May 7th. Only Reform UK fights for democracy.”

In late 2025, Labour’s government also postponed several new mayoral elections, pushing them back by two years. That move drew heavy criticism from Reform, which said those contests were in areas where its support was rising sharply and likely to translate into wins.

Reform’s momentum in local contests has been strong, with the populist party taking council seats from both Labour and the formerly governing Conservatives, and even a seat in Parliament following a by-election (special election). In some local areas where elections were cancelled or delayed, polling suggested Reform was significantly ahead of the establishment parties, including as much as a double-digit lead over Labour in parts of Essex, near London.

Against this backdrop, critics of Starmer’s election postponements have argued he was simply attempting to shield Labour from bad results. Reform believes it would likely have won several of the mayoral contests that have been delayed, based on electoral calculations.

Image via European Union / EP.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Group Behind UK PM Starmer’s Rise Paid U.S. Lobbyists to Smear Journalists as Russian Stooges.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Labour Together, led by British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, is facing investigation for hiring U.S. lobbyists to do opposition research on journalists behind a critical Sunday Times article.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Labour Together, U.S. lobbying firm APCO, journalists Gabriel Pogrund and Harry Yorke, and leading Labour Party figures including Morgan McSweeney and Keir Starmer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The investigation occurred in late 2023 and early 2024, following a Sunday Times report on undeclared donations by Labour Together.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The freedom of the press and the ability of journalists to work free from harassment and intimidation is a vital foundation of our free society.” – Nick Timothy, Member of Parliament (MP)

🎯IMPACT: The revelations have sparked calls for investigations into APCO and Labour Together, and raise questions about Labour Together’s role in Starmer’s leadership campaign.

IN FULL

Labour Together, which played a key role in helping Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer win the leadership of Britain’s governing Labour Party, brought in the U.S. lobbying firm APCO Worldwide to look into the personal, political, and religious backgrounds of reporters who wrote a critical article about them in The Sunday Times. That article revealed that £730,000 (~$1m) in donations made between 2017 and 2020 had not been properly declared—an issue later found by the Electoral Commission to be in violation of Britain’s campaign finance rules.

APCO’s findings, compiled under the codename “Operation Cannon,” reportedly contained unfounded and highly personal allegations about Sunday Times journalists Gabriel Pogrund and Harry Yorke. The document attempted to undermine their reporting by suggesting that the information on the unlawful donations had been obtained through Russian hacking of the Electoral Commission, and asserting without evidence that the “likeliest culprit is the Russian state, or proxies of the Russian state.”

According to reports, the document was circulated informally among Labour figures, including cabinet ministers and special advisers, and was used to fuel a whispering campaign targeting the journalists. Member of Parliament (MP) Nick Timothy called the report an “appalling” act of “harassment and intimidation” against the press. Notably, similar unfounded claims of Russian collusion have been circulated against Brexit leader Nigel Farage, U.S. President Donald J. Trump, and other anti-establishment figures across the West for many years.

Josh Simons, now serving as a Cabinet Office minister, acknowledged that he had commissioned APCO’s work. He said he asked for that material to be removed before passing the report to the National Cyber Security Centre, which ultimately decided not to pursue a full investigation.

The disclosures have led to calls for an investigation into Labour Together and ACPO’s conduct. Starmer has claimed he has no knowledge of ACPO’s activities and that he would support an investigation. Notably, Starmer’s former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney was the leader of Labour Together. His resignation was forced over his role in the elevation of Jeffrey Epstein-linked Lord Peter Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to the U.S., which has caused huge embarrassment for Starmer’s government over recent weeks.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Epstein-Linked Former British Ambassador Summoned by Congress.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Former British ambassador to the U.S. Lord Peter Mandelson has been asked to testify before the U.S. Congress regarding the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Peter Mandelson and the House Oversight Committee.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The letter was sent on February 13, 2026, with a response deadline by February 27.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Numerous pieces of evidence have come to light demonstrating your close ties to Jeffrey Epstein over the span of multiple years.” – Lawmakers’ letter to Mandelson

🎯IMPACT: The investigation seeks to uncover Epstein’s co-conspirators and the extent of his operations, with Mandelson’s involvement under scrutiny.

IN FULL

Former British ambassador to the U.S. Lord Peter Mandelson has received a summons to appear before the U.S. Congress amid the continuing probe into deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operations. House lawmakers issued the request after the most recent Epstein-related documents were made public, suggesting that Mandelson—Epstein’s “best pal”—had been leaking confidential information to the sex trafficker when he was a British government minister under former Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

The House Oversight Committee stressed the need to identify Epstein’s accomplices and grasp the complete extent of his illegal activities. In the correspondence to Mandelson, it pointed out the Briton’s “extensive social and business ties” to Epstein, indicating that he possesses vital details for the inquiry.

Mandelson has a deadline of February 27 to reply to the summons, although as a non-U.S. citizen he is not required by law to give testimony. Separately, London’s Metropolitan Police recently conducted searches at Mandelson’s residences in Camden, North London, and Wiltshire, amid suspicions that his alleged sharing of sensitive details with Epstein during his tenure as Business Secretary was criminal.

Mandelson, appointed to the ambassadorship by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer despite his known friendship with Epstein and forced to resign when U.S. disclosures about the pedophile revealed more details of their relationship, has repeatedly rejected any accusations of misconduct. However, he has announced he will resign from the House of Lords and from Starmer’s Labour Party amid the scandal.

Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, warned against Mandelson prior to his appointment as ambassador, noting his Epstein links and his past comments describing President Donald J. Trump as “little short of a white nationalist and a racist.” He said the appointment was an insult to Americans and recommended that President Trump reject his diplomatic credentials.

Image by Ted Eytan.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Muslim Mayor Guilty of Trying to Help Son Cover Up Child Rape.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Labour Party mayor obstructed a police raid to help her son hide a phone linked to the rape of a 15-year-old girl.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Naheed Ejaz, former Mayor of Bracknell, and her son, Diwan Khan.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on September 12, 2024, at their home in Bracknell, Berkshire, with Ejaz convicted of perverting the course of justice in February 2026.

💬KEY QUOTE: “A conspiracy of silence not to give the police the phone.” – Prosecutor Ed Wylde.

🎯IMPACT: Both Ejaz and Khan were found guilty of perverting the course of justice, with Khan also convicted of rape.

IN FULL

A Muslim former British Labour Party mayor has been found guilty of perverting the course of justice after helping her son conceal evidence related to his rape of a 15-year-old girl. Naheed Ejaz, 61, who served as mayor from 2023 to 2024, delayed police entry to her home for over 90 seconds on September 12, 2024, allowing her son, Diwan Khan, 41, to hide his mobile phone. The device reportedly contained video footage of the assault.

Khan was convicted at Winchester Crown Court of raping the teenager, which took place in June 2024. Prosecutors said he gave her vodka laced with the illicit drug, MDMA, causing her to black out. She awoke unclothed in the back of his car with no memory of the incident. Khan filmed the attack and later threatened to show the video to her mother and to “slit her throat” if she reported him.

During the police visit, Ejaz and Khan spoke in Urdu to avoid detection, and did not use the word “phone” as it is the same in both languages. Prosecutor Ed Wylde labelled the incident “A conspiracy of silence not to give the police the phone.”

Ejaz claimed the delay was only to wake her son so he could speak to officers. The court rejected this, ruling her actions were intentional obstruction.

Khan, who acted as his mother’s Mayor’s Consort during her term, admitted perverting the course of justice by hiding the phone but denied rape. He was convicted on the rape charge as well. Both Ejaz and Khan await sentencing following the trial.

The case comes amid broader concerns about child rape and child sexual exploitation in Britain involving Muslim asylum seekers and grooming gangs. Recent reviews have exposed police failures in handling grooming gang cases, including a National Crime Agency operation that led to reopening over 1,000 historic investigations due to overlooked evidence and improper closures.

Reports have noted disproportionate involvement of perpetrators from Pakistani backgrounds in some organized exploitation networks, alongside institutional reluctance to act over fears of racism accusations. In 2025, the police watchdog admitted senior officers failed to protect victims in Rotherham, while a government advisory panel for grooming gang inquiries was disbanded in early 2026, prompting criticism from survivors.

Image by Carlosgg1961.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

WATCH: Farage Says Man Utd Owner Ratcliffe is Right About Britain Being ‘Colonized by Immigrants.’

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Reform Party leader Nigel Farage has backed comments by Manchester United owner and industrial tycoon Sir Jim Ratcliffe about immigration and its impact on Britain.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage and Jim Ratcliffe.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Farage made his comments in a video statement published online on Thursday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “[L]ook at parts of London, for example, where the road names and underground signs aren’t just in English—they’re in a foreign language as well. One million people living in this country don’t speak any English at all. Four million people living in this country barely speak passable English. And that’s the point he was making: that big areas of our towns and cities have been changed into something completely different to what they were, and that it’s all making us poorer.” – Nigel Farage

🎯IMPACT: Ratcliffe’s comments and Farage’s endorsement of them showcase the growing importance of mass migration and its consequences in Britain’s political discourse.

IN FULL

Reform Party leader Nigel Farage has endorsed British billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s recent remarks on mass migration, insisting the INEOS founder and Manchester United co-owner is correct in highlighting the pressures on the country’s resources and identity. Sir Jim stated in a recent interview that Britain “has been colonized by immigrants,” arguing that the nation cannot sustain “an economy with nine million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in.”

In a video statement released on Thursday morning, Farage backed the Tycoon, saying, “What he said [is] that our population has gone up from 58 million to 70 million and that with nine million people of working age on benefits, we don’t need mass migration. He said much of the country had been colonized by immigrants.”

Addressing backlash from Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and other liberals over the use of the word “colonized,” Farage said, “Now, that word was a controversial word, and he said, ‘OK, if you don’t like the word, we’ll tone it down.’ But just think about this: You ask yourself why public services have diminished. You ask yourself why rents have gone through the roof. The population explosion has done that.”

Farage pointed to the many visible changes in Britain’s urban areas, noting “parts of London, for example, where the road names, the Underground signs aren’t just in English, they’re in a foreign language as well. One million people living in this country don’t speak any English at all. Four million people living in this country barely speak passable English.”

He argued these shifts have fundamentally altered communities, “that big areas of our towns and cities have been changed into something completely different to what they were. And that it’s all making us poorer.”

Farage rejected the criticism of Sir Jim from the Prime Minister and corporate media outlets, declaring: “I don’t really care if Number 10 is in uproar or if much of mainstream media find his comments too difficult. I believe firmly that Jim Ratcliffe is right.”

YouGov tracking shows 69 percent of Britons believe immigration levels over the last ten years have been too high, with a mere four percent saying they have been too low and just 17 percent viewing them as about right, indicating broad public alignment with concerns raised by Ratcliffe and Farage.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

UK PM Faces Backlash for Appointing ANOTHER Pedo-Linked Lord.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Labour peer Lord Matthew Doyle was suspended from the party over his links to a convicted pedophile councillor, Sean Morton.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, Lord Matthew Doyle, Sean Morton, and female Labour Members of Parliament (MPs).

📍WHEN & WHERE: The controversy surfaced following Lord Doyle’s January appointment to the House of Lords, with the suspension occurring this week.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Matthew Doyle did not give a full account of his actions. On Monday I promised my party and my country there will be change. And yesterday I removed the whip from Matthew Doyle.” – Sir Keir Starmer.

🎯IMPACT: The incident, coming so soon after revelations concerning Jeffrey Epstein-linked Lord Peter Mandelson, who was made ambassador to the U.S. by Starmer, has increased criticism of the Prime Minister’s judgement, with female Labour MPs questioning his leadership and decision-making.

IN FULL

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is facing mounting criticism after it emerged that Lord Matthew Doyle, whom he appointed to the House of Lords in January, had campaigned for Sean Morton, a councillor later convicted of possessing indecent images of children. The revelation has triggered anger within Labour ranks and renewed questions over the Prime Minister’s judgment in senior appointments, following his prior promotion of Jeffrey Epstein’s self-described “best pal” Lord Peter Mandelson.

Doyle supported Morton during the 2017 local election campaign despite Morton having already been charged with offenses involving indecent images of children. Starmer claims “Matthew Doyle did not give a full account of his actions… I promised my party and my country there will be change, and yesterday I removed the whip from Matthew Doyle.”

The controversy has prompted sharp criticism from Labour MPs, particularly among women in the party. Kim Johnson, Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside, said, “The Doyle revelations only confirm he’s not fit to govern. He’s only been in the Lords a matter of weeks, yet it was already known that he was a friend of—and campaigned for—a convicted pedophile. Another example of very poor judgment.”

Another female Labour MP drew comparisons with the Mandelson controversy, saying, “They knew about Mandelson and Epstein when they hired him and they knew about Doyle and Morton when they put him in the Lords, so you have to question their judgement.”

The Mandelson affair has already caused significant turbulence for Starmer’s government. The fallout contributed to the resignation of Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, further intensifying pressure on the Prime Minister.

Image by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Afghan Convicted for Kidnap and Repeated Rape of 12-Year-Old.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: An Afghan asylum seeker was found guilty of abducting and raping a 12-year-old girl in a targeted attack in Nuneaton, England.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Afghan national Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was convicted of multiple offences. His co-defendant, Mohammad Kabir, was acquitted of all charges.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The attack occurred last summer in Nuneaton. The trial took place at Warwick Crown Court.

💬KEY QUOTE: “He will plainly receive a substantial custodial sentence which will automatically make him liable for deportation at its conclusion.” – Judge Kristina Montgomery KC

🎯IMPACT: The case sparked protests and calls for more transparency from public figures regarding the immigration status of offenders.

IN FULL

Ahmad Mulakhil, a 23-year-old Afghan asylum seeker, has been convicted of multiple serious offences following a targeted attack on a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, England, last summer. A jury at Warwick Crown Court found him guilty of rape, two counts of sexual assault, child abduction, and taking an indecent video of the child. He had also admitted to an additional rape charge before the trial began.

Mulakhil arrived in Britain around four months before the attack after submitting an immigration application that referred to unspecified “problems” in Afghanistan. Although the jury was not told how he entered the country, it later emerged that he had arrived illegally on a small boat.

His co-defendant, Mohammad Kabir, also an Afghan asylum seeker, was cleared of all charges, including intentional strangulation, attempted child abduction, and committing an offence with intent to commit a sexual offence. Kabir denied any wrongdoing, telling the court that he “never touched the victim and had no sexual intentions toward her.” He claimed to be 22, while court records listed his age as 24.

Remanding Mulakhil in custody ahead of sentencing, Judge Kristina Montgomery KC said, “He will plainly receive a substantial custodial sentence which will automatically make him liable for deportation at its conclusion.” This does not mean he definitely will be deported, however, with many foreign sex offenders in Britain able to use human rights laws to stay in the country.

The convictions drew sharp reactions from senior political figures. Reform Paarty leader Nigel Farage and Warwickshire County Council leader George Finch accused authorities of a “cover-up” over how details of the case were handled publicly. Farage renewed calls for police to routinely disclose the immigration status of criminal suspects, something that is not standard practice despite being permitted under current guidance “if deemed necessary for legitimate policing purposes.”

The case has added to wider debate following other recent reports involving Afghan nationals in the United Kingdom and the United States, including prosecutions for serious sexual offences, fatal stabbings, and alleged terror threats.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

Counter-Terror Cops Investigate School Stabbing.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A double stabbing at Kingsbury High School in north London is under investigation, with counter-terrorism officers involved.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Two boys, aged 12 and 13, were stabbed, and a 13-year-old boy was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred at Kingsbury High School on Bacon Lane, Brent, at around 12.40 PM.

💬KEY QUOTE: “At this very early stage, we’re keeping an open mind as to any motivation behind this attack.” – Det Ch Supt Luke Williams

🎯IMPACT: The school community is in shock, and the investigation is ongoing with a focus on the circumstances surrounding the attack.

IN FULL

Counter-terrorism officers are now leading the investigation into a double stabbing at Kingsbury High School in Brent, north-west London, where two boys aged 12 and 13 were seriously injured.

The attack occurred around 12:40 PM on Tuesday, February 10, when police were called to the school following reports that a 13-year-old boy had been stabbed. Officers discovered a second victim, a 12-year-old boy, who had also been stabbed. Both were rushed to the hospital, with one transported as a priority to a major trauma center. Their conditions are described as serious.

A 13-year-old suspect was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder shortly afterward. Police recovered what they believe to be the weapon used in the attack and have stated they are not currently searching for anyone else in connection with the incident.

Detective Chief Superintendent Luke Williams, who oversees policing in north-west London, said, “At this very early stage, we’re keeping an open mind as to any motivation behind this attack.”

“However, due to the surrounding circumstances, the investigation is now being led by officers from Counter-Terrorism Policing London,” he continued, adding: “This has not currently been declared a terrorist incident and the investigation team will now be working at pace to gather any evidence and to establish the full circumstances of what has happened as quickly as possible.”

Image by Kidfly182.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more

WATCH: Farage Moves to Election ‘War Footing’ as Epstein Scandal Threatens to Bring Down UK Govt.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage announced he is putting his Reform Party on a “general election war footing” at a rally in Birmingham, England, on Monday, as a Jeffrey Epstein-related scandal threatens to bring down Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage and the Reform Party, Keir Starmer and the Labour Party, Starmer’s former ambassador to the U.S., Lord Peter Mandelson, and Mandelson’s deceased “best pal” Jeffrey Epstein.

📍WHEN & WHERE: February 9, 2026, in Birmingham, England.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The Mandelson saga tells you all that you need to know. Its depths, the numbers of people that it involves, the sheer level of corruption is probably the biggest political scandal we’ve seen for a hundred years.” – Nigel Farage

🎯IMPACT: The Mandelson-Epstein scandal has put Prime Minister Starmer’s position in jeopardy, with calls for his resignation from senior Labour colleagues.

IN FULL

Reform Party leader Nigel Farage is putting his party on a general election “war footing” as a scandal involving the now-former British ambassador to the U.S., Lord Peter Mandelson, and deceased pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein threatens to bring down Starmer’s government.

Starmer appointed Mandelson, a former European Commissioner and Cabinet member under prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, as ambassador to the U.S., despite a history of prior scandals in high office and his known friendship with Epstein. Mandelson had to resign his ambassadorship following further revelations of his relationship with the sex trafficker, with the scandal deepening after even more recent revelations suggesting he shared confidential information with Epstein during Brown’s premiership.

Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, has already been ousted in the fallout from the Mandelson scandal, although Starmer himself is insisting he will not resign as of the time of publication.

Speaking at a rally in Birmingham, England, Farage noted that the leader of the Labour Party in Scotland, Anas Sarwar, has now called for Starmer to go, and that the Prime Minister has to meet Labour Members of Parliament (MPs) this evening, where they may demand his resignation.

“[T]he political life of the most unpopular and the most useless Prime Minister in living memory is drawing to a close,” Farage said at the rally, adding: “The Mandelson saga tells you all that you need to know. Its depths, the number of people that it involves, the sheer level of corruption is probably the biggest political scandal we’ve seen for a hundred years, and it’s not as if the PM wasn’t warned.”

“He won’t be there for long. He’ll be gone, and replaced by someone undoubtedly far worse,” Farage suggested, noting how the previously governing Conservatives took “14 long years” to destroy their reputation while Starmer’s Labour Party has managed it in a matter of 18 months.

Municipal elections across Britain, which Farage likened to the U.S. midterms at the rally, are due in May, even if a snap general election is not called.

This story is developing…

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more