Thursday, February 26, 2026
Trudeau Xi

Public Inquiry Finds Chinese Election Interference Aided Justin Trudeau – Is The Same Tactic Happening Here?

Revelations in February that the Chinese communist government sought to interfere in the past two Canadian elections on behalf of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the ruling Liberal Party have sparked a public inquiry in Ottowa. Over the past three weeks, the inquiry commission has heard testimony from top Trudeau government aides, national security and intelligence officials, and the Prime Minister himself. Despite Trudeau’s insistence that the 2019 and 2021 Canadian elections were “free and fair,” testimony from intelligence officials suggests otherwise.

‘CHINA GOT THE OUTCOME IT WANTED.’

“It would just seem very improbable that the Chinese government itself would have a preference in the election,” Prime Minister Trudeau testified last week before the inquiry, which Quebec Court of Appeal Justice Marie-Josée Hogue heads. However, intelligence documents made public in the course of the inquiry detail a sophisticated and concerted effort by agents acting on behalf of China to push Chinese-Canadian voters to back Liberal Party candidates over their Conservative Party opponents. In response to the proceedings, The Washington Post concluded: “China got the outcome it wanted in 2021 — the reelection of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with a minority government.”

A Canadian intelligence investigation into Chinese activities during the 2021 election concluded that the communist regime used Chinese immigrants, members of their diplomatic service, political proxies, as well as Chinese-language news outlets to induce — or even coerce — Chinese-Canadian voters to back candidates they viewed as friendly or open to Beijing’s global agenda.

While this meant pushing Liberal Party candidates in 2019 and 2021, there is concerning evidence that the Conservatives may also be the subject to Beijing’s influence. Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre has sought to improve the party’s standing among Chinese-Canadians. In January, Poilievre appeared at a Toronto Chinese community event alongside several individuals with extensive ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

U.S. IMPLICATIONS.

The Chinese efforts to influence Canadian elections also hold stark implications for the United States. The ongoing immigration crisis at the U.S. southern border has seen a historic number of Chinese enter the country illegally. Many of these individuals are men of military age whom U.S officials know little about — raising concerns about their roles in potential Chinese intelligence operations in America.

show less
Revelations in February that the Chinese communist government sought to interfere in the past two Canadian elections on behalf of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the ruling Liberal Party have sparked a public inquiry in Ottowa. Over the past three weeks, the inquiry commission has heard testimony from top Trudeau government aides, national security and intelligence officials, and the Prime Minister himself. Despite Trudeau's insistence that the 2019 and 2021 Canadian elections were "free and fair," testimony from intelligence officials suggests otherwise. show more
Biden Election Democrats

Did You Know That YOU Are Subsidizing Democrat Electioneering?

Democrats are using a national network of non-profit, tax-exempt organizations to spearhead efforts to boost voter turnout among critical partisan demographics for the 2024 presidential election. Some non-profit groups even operate on federal grants, further entangling taxpayer dollars in partisan election operations. This effort is in tandem with the Biden government’s mandate that federal agencies enact plans to maximize voter registration and citizen participation in the election process.

In 2021, Biden signed Executive Order 14019 — which directs the various agencies and departments in his government to “consider ways to expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process.” The National Pulse previously reported on these efforts, including the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)’s concerning relationship with Demos — a left-wing non-profit dedicated to ‘racial justice.’

Under the guise of a ‘public service,’ President Joe Biden’s order effectively incorporates the federal government in aiding Democrat turnout efforts. While the order claims agencies are to only work with ” approved, non-partisan third-party organizations,” that has not happened in practice. According to Demos, they expect to be able to add 3 million new voters to the 2024 election rolls — paid for by U.S. taxpayer dollars.

In addition to the direct collusion with partisan non-profits, the Biden government has also expanded work categories as part of student work-study programs to include students who are paid to help register voters in a non-partisan manner. Protect the Public’s Trust initiated legal action against the Biden government in mid-March after the Department of Education failed to comply with a FOIA request asking for documents pertaining to the work-study decision.

show less

Democrats are using a national network of non-profit, tax-exempt organizations to spearhead efforts to boost voter turnout among critical partisan demographics for the 2024 presidential election. Some non-profit groups even operate on federal grants, further entangling taxpayer dollars in partisan election operations. This effort is in tandem with the Biden government's mandate that federal agencies enact plans to maximize voter registration and citizen participation in the election process.

show more
Trump Florida Poll

DATA: Trump Holds Double-Digit Lead Over Biden In Florida Despite Abortion Ballot Measure.

A new poll appears to dash the Biden re-election campaign’s hopes that abortion could play a significant role in expanding the number of states in play during the 2024 presidential election. According to a new Emerson College survey, former President Donald Trump has jumped out to a double-digit lead over the 81-year-old President Joe Biden in Florida, despite the hope an abortion ballot referendum could narrow the race in the state.

The poll, conducted after the Florida Supreme Court approved ballot language for November’s election asking voters whether to enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution, shows Trump winning 51 percent of registered voters to Biden‘s 38 percent. Meanwhile, 11 percent of voters say they remain undecided. Despite Trump’s impressive lead, the abortion ballot measure received a plurality of voter support.

Democrats have pushed a series of state-level ballot measures securing abortion rights as part of their 2024 election strategy. Party operatives have theorized that the move would energize progressive and female voters to turn out for Biden and other Democrat candidates en masse — possibly even putting some previously sold-Republican states in play. President Biden himself suggested the abortion issue could pave the way for him to win Florida.

However, the Emerson College poll has thrown cold water on these hopes despite Biden’s campaign manager, Julie Chavez Rodriguez, previously projecting optimism. “Make no mistake: Florida is not an easy state to win, but it is a winnable one for President Biden, especially given Trump’s weak, cash-strapped campaign, and serious vulnerabilities within his coalition,” Rodriguez wrote following the Florida Supreme Court’s approval of the abortion ballot measure.

The same survey shows incumbent Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) jumping out to a seven-point lead over his Democrat challenger, former Congresswoman Debbie Mucarsel-Powell.

show less
A new poll appears to dash the Biden re-election campaign's hopes that abortion could play a significant role in expanding the number of states in play during the 2024 presidential election. According to a new Emerson College survey, former President Donald Trump has jumped out to a double-digit lead over the 81-year-old President Joe Biden in Florida, despite the hope an abortion ballot referendum could narrow the race in the state. show more

More Latinos Than Ever Want a Border Wall, Mass Deportations.

The construction of a border wall between the United States and Mexico is now supported by nearly half of Latino voters, according to a new poll. Additionally, almost 40 percent of those same voters support deporting all illegal immigrants from the U.S.

According to the Axios-Ipsos survey, support for the border wall has jumped 12–points since December 2021, with 42 percent of Latino voters saying they now support the construction. The survey also — for the first time — asked Latino voters if they backed the president closing the U.S.-Mexico border if too many illegal immigrants were seen crossing into the country. Nearly two-thirds of respondents (64 percent) believed the president should have the authority to close the border.

Overall, immigration ranked as the third most important issue for Latino voters — behind crime and inflation. Over the past several months, polls have shown consistent weakness for President Joe Biden on all three issues — with voters overwhelmingly saying that former President Donald Trump is more capable of handling these problems.

Chris Jackson, senior vice president and pollster at Ipsos, said the survey “illustrates that some immigration hardline positions (are) incrementally more popular” among the Latino voter demographic. The data adds further credence to recent polls, which suggest Latino and Hispanic support for former President Donald Trump is growing because of his tougher stance on illegal immigration.

The National Pulse reported in late March that 74 percent of Hispanic voters backed using the term “Illegal” to describe Laken Riley’s murderer — Venezuelan national Jose Antonio Ibarra. A February Marist poll showed that nearly 60 percent of Hispanic voters disapprove of President Biden’s open border policies.

show less
The construction of a border wall between the United States and Mexico is now supported by nearly half of Latino voters, according to a new poll. Additionally, almost 40 percent of those same voters support deporting all illegal immigrants from the U.S. show more

Biden May Miss Deadline to Appear on November Ballot in SECOND State.

President Joe Biden may be barred from appearing on a second state’s presidential ballot in November due to conflicts between state election law and the timing of the Democratic National Convention. According to Alabama’s Secretary of State Wes Allen (R), state law requires a “certificate of nomination” for the nominated president and vice president at least 82 days before the election, currently scheduled for November 5. However, the Biden re-election campaign won’t be able to provide the certification until the party’s convention, which is set to begin after the deadline on August 19.

In a letter, the Alabama Secretary of State urged the state’s Democratic Party and the Democratic National Committee to adhere to the legal deadline. Allen made it clear that he will not be able to certify the Democratic Party’s nominees for the November 2024 election if the necessary paperwork is not submitted in time.

The Biden campaign faces a similar situation in Ohio. In a letter to the state’s Democratic Party Chairwoman Liz Walters, Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose (R) warned the scheduled national convention date is over a week past the August 7 deadline for certifying candidates for the ballot.

Despite the candidate certification timing issues in both states, the Biden campaign says they are confident the 81-year-old Democrat incumbent will appear on all 50 state ballots. In response to the convention timing problem, they are advocating for provisional ballot access certification before the conclusion of the presidential nominating convention. The campaign notes this has been allowed in Alabama, Illinois, Montana, and Washington. However, the Alabama Secretary of State asserts that state election law does not offer ‘provisional certifications’ for candidates.

show less
President Joe Biden may be barred from appearing on a second state's presidential ballot in November due to conflicts between state election law and the timing of the Democratic National Convention. According to Alabama's Secretary of State Wes Allen (R), state law requires a "certificate of nomination" for the nominated president and vice president at least 82 days before the election, currently scheduled for November 5. However, the Biden re-election campaign won't be able to provide the certification until the party's convention, which is set to begin after the deadline on August 19. show more

Could RFK Join The Biden-Trump Debates? Here’s What the Rules Say…

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. could be the first third-party candidate to qualify for a presidential debate since Ross Perot in 1992. However, the scion of the Kennedy clan needs to jump through a few hoops before he finds himself on a debate stage with President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.

Whether RFK, Jr. is allowed to debate alongside the Republican and Democrat Party nominees will largely depend on who organizes the presidential debate itself. Debates sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) have a series of criteria that third-party candidates must meet before they’re included on the debate stage.

COMMISSION DEBATE RULES.

New CPD rules adopted in 2019 require candidates to garner an average of 15 percent of the vote, averaged across five national presidential polls. Additionally, third-party candidates must have acquired ballot access in enough states to demonstrate their electoral viability. This means they, at least hypothetically, could win the 270 electoral votes required to secure the presidency.

RFK, Jr. does not currently meet either of the CPD’s stipulations. Recent national polling shows the Kennedy family member garnering between 8 and 11 percent of the vote, falling short of the 15 percent threshold. Additionally, the independent presidential candidate remains well shy of being mathematically able to win the presidency, having achieved ballot access in only a handful of states.

RFK JR. SHORT OF QUALIFYING, FOR NOW.

The Kennedy campaign site indicates that the candidate has secured a ballot line in only seven states — including Hawaii, Nevada, Idaho, Utah, Nebraska, North Carolina, and New Hampshire. This comes to a total of 37 electoral votes, well shy of the 270 needed to win the White House. However, analysis by The National Pulse indicates that RFK, Jr. may be closer to electoral viability than his campaign lets on, having exceeded ballot qualification criteria in at least ten states when accounting for write-in rules — meaning he could win a maximum of 90 electors at the moment.

ALTERNATIVE DEBATE?

The CPD rules may not matter at all since the Republican National Committee (RNC) appears to be still boycotting the group’s sponsorship of presidential debates. An alternative debate agreed to by the Republican and Democratic Parties could potentially include Kennedy — though whether Biden or Trump would greenlight his inclusion is unclear.

show less
Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. could be the first third-party candidate to qualify for a presidential debate since Ross Perot in 1992. However, the scion of the Kennedy clan needs to jump through a few hoops before he finds himself on a debate stage with President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump. show more
biden

WATCH: Biden Appears to Forget His Own Name.

President Joe Biden, 81, appeared to forget his own name during a speech on the economy delivered at Washington, D.C.’s Union Station on Tuesday. “My dad used to say ‘A job… Joey… I give you my word as a tray… ‘” the President began, confusingly stumbling over his words. Abandoning the anecdote, Biden said: “A job is about a lot more than a paycheck. It’s about your dignity. It’s about respect.”

In a video of the speech, Biden briefly hesitates while attempting to quote his father’s words, appearing unclear how his father referred to him in the anecdote before settling on “Joey.” Incidents of the octogenarian Democrat displaying confusion and memory lapses in both public and private interactions have become increasingly common — fueling voter concerns that he is suffering from cognitive decline and too old to serve another term in office.

During an impromptu address in February responding to DOJ special counsel Robert Hur’s 345-page report on his mishandling of classified documents, Biden insisted he was mentally fit despite the report detailing evidence to the contrary. While taking questions at the end of his speech, the President described General Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, the President of Egypt, as “the President of Mexico” and implied the U.S.’ southern neighbor actually bordered Gaza.

The transcripts of DOJ special counsel Robert Hur’s interviews with Biden reveal a damning picture of the President’s mental state. After their release in March, The National Pulse reported President Biden stated that he “did not know,” “could not recall,” or “did not remember” almost 150 times over five hours. Additionally, the transcripts confirmed that Biden struggled to remember when he served as Vice President and the date of his son Beau Biden’s death.

WATCH:

show less
President Joe Biden, 81, appeared to forget his own name during a speech on the economy delivered at Washington, D.C.'s Union Station on Tuesday. "My dad used to say 'A job... Joey... I give you my word as a tray... '" the President began, confusingly stumbling over his words. Abandoning the anecdote, Biden said: "A job is about a lot more than a paycheck. It's about your dignity. It's about respect." show more
trump

Even Anti-Trump Psychos Are Admitting The Genius of Trump’s Abortion Statement.

Figures in both the pro-Donald Trump and anti-Donald Trump camps agree his announcement on abortion was smart politics. On Monday, former President Donald Trump issued a video statement on abortion and access to fertility treatments. Trump said he supports the states being allowed to decide on abortion limits, saying many will have different rules, but “at the end of the day, this is all about the will of the people.” He also stressed that supporting in vitro fertilization (IVF) was an “important part” of supporting parents in their “quest for the ultimate joy in life.”

“It’s actually a savvy take,” said anti-Trump co-host of ABC’s The View, Alyssa Farah Griffin, in an interview with The Daily Beast. She continued: “He can claim the conservative mantle that he’s for states’ rights. And he avoids the political liability of calling for 15 weeks, which Republicans see as a betrayal on the life issue and Democrats will frame as a national abortion ban.”

“Now he’s repositioning to punt responsibility for the more extreme abortion decisions on Republican governors and off of himself,” Griffin added.

In addition to a begrudging acknowledgment from anti-Trumpers, the former President received backing from several key U.S. Senate allies. On Monday, Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) told the press that he thought former President Trump‘s stance was “generally the right approach.” Hawley added, “We don’t have a national referendum system.”

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), a one-time Trump-skeptic, echoed the former President’s abortion statement when he returned to Capitol Hill on Monday, stating, “it’s the voters who decide” not the government or a court “decreeing a rule for everyone and disenfranchising the voters.”

show less
Figures in both the pro-Donald Trump and anti-Donald Trump camps agree his announcement on abortion was smart politics. On Monday, former President Donald Trump issued a video statement on abortion and access to fertility treatments. Trump said he supports the states being allowed to decide on abortion limits, saying many will have different rules, but “at the end of the day, this is all about the will of the people.” He also stressed that supporting in vitro fertilization (IVF) was an “important part” of supporting parents in their “quest for the ultimate joy in life." show more

Editor’s Notes

Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.

RAHEEM J. KASSAM Editor-in-Chief
I personally think it is high time people wrote to the forever-losers at the Pro Life Inc groups in Washington, D
I personally think it is high time people wrote to the forever-losers at the Pro Life Inc groups in Washington, D show more
for exclusive members-only insights

Democrat Abigail Spanberger Complains About Having to Talk to Constituents for 30 Minutes.

Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA), a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) spook, has complained about having to talk to her constituents, according to a recent interview.

“Conversations become very lengthy… We ended up spending 30 minutes inside my constituent’s home,” Spanberger lamented, noting some issues she’s run into while campaigning alongside Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD).

Raskin, one of the chief Trump critics among Congressional Democrats and propagators of the Russia Collusion hoax, has hit the national campaign trail to help boost the electoral prospects of Democrats like Spanberger by energizing the anti-Donald Trump vote in their races. In Spanberger’s case, the Virginia Democrat is foregoing re-election in Congress and instead seeking her party’s nomination for Virginia governor in 2025.

Some have seen Spanberger’s move as a tacit admission that she would be unable to hold her vulnerable House seat in Virginia’s 7th Congressional District. While the district went to President Joe Biden by nearly seven points in 2020, Spanberger’s lack of responsiveness to her constituents and out-of-step liberal voting record on immigration has led to the partisan-lean narrowing. Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R-VA) won the district by five points in 2021.

Spanberger’s background as a CIA officer made her an appealing candidate in 2018 — especially as national Democrats hyped up conspiracies about then-President Donald Trump and Russian collusion in the 2016 election. However, voters across the spectrum have increasingly tuned out the Russia conspiracy theories as real-life concerns regarding unfettered illegal immigration mount. Spanberger has left herself increasingly vulnerable on this issue, most recently voting against the Laken Riley Act.

While Spanberger and Virginia Democrats appear to have recognized her elite and globalist politics made the former CIA spook unpopular among constituents in her Congressional District, it isn’t clear what they think changes regarding her appeal to Virginians at large.

show less
Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA), a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) spook, has complained about having to talk to her constituents, according to a recent interview. show more

No Labels Abandons Effort to Run a 3rd Party Candidate.

No Labels announced on Thursday that it is abandoning efforts to recruit a candidate to pursue a third-party run in the 2024 presidential election. The ‘centrist’ political group had been rumored to have tried recruiting several potential candidates to run on its ballot line, including Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), former Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ), former Gov. Nikki Haley (R-SC), former Gov. Larry Hogan (R-MD), and former Gov. Chris Sununu (R-NH).

“No Labels has always said we would only offer our ballot line to a ticket if we could identify candidates with a credible path to winning the White House,” the group’s CEO, Nancy Jacobson, said in a statement. She added: “No such candidates emerged, so the responsible course of action is for us to stand down.”

The group launched its effort to field a competitive third-party presidential candidate in 2022, raising a multi-million dollar campaign war chest in the subsequent years. In November 2023, No Labels’s chief strategist, Ryan Clancy, predicted: “Based on the conditions as they are, we expect to be putting up a ticket early next year.” As late as January of this year, the group claimed they were considering 13 candidates to put forward on a third-party unity ticket.

Early in the 2024 presidential election cycle, No Labels surprised the campaign world by gaining ballot access in over a dozen states, demonstrating that they had built an organized effort. Throughout its candidate search, the group maintained its intention to recruit a candidate who could contend with Democratic incumbent President Joe Biden and his Republican challenger, former President Donald Trump.

Former Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT), the founding chairman of No Labels, passed away on March 27, 2024.

show less
No Labels announced on Thursday that it is abandoning efforts to recruit a candidate to pursue a third-party run in the 2024 presidential election. The 'centrist' political group had been rumored to have tried recruiting several potential candidates to run on its ballot line, including Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), former Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ), former Gov. Nikki Haley (R-SC), former Gov. Larry Hogan (R-MD), and former Gov. Chris Sununu (R-NH). show more