Thursday, April 24, 2025

Former NIH Director Admits There Was No Evidence For COVID Six-Foot Social Distancing Rules.

Former director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Francis Collins is admitting the stringently enforced social-distancing measures endorsed by top health agencies were not underpinned by firm scientific evidence. The revelation came in closed-door testimony earlier this year before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

Collins was asked whether he recalled there being any scientific evidence backing up the six-feet social distancing requirements enforced by state governments across the county during the COVID-19 pandemic. “I do not,” the former NIH director replied.

Pressed further on the issue, Collins clarified that not only was he not shown any evidence of the need for social distancing at the time, but he hasn’t seen any scientific evidence to back up the practice since the pandemic. “Since then, it has been an awfully large topic. Have you seen any evidence since then supporting six feet?” Collins was asked by a committee staffer during the testimony. The former NIH director responded: “No.”

Social distancing measures played a consequential role in the closure of businesses and schools, leading to the loss of significant educational opportunities and critical small-business resources. Mask mandates and social distancing lead to a steep decline in learning levels among students, especially the very young. According to one report, masking likely resulted in a 350 percent surge in childhood speech-learning delays.

Echoing Collins’s admission, Dr. Anthony Fauci acknowledged in January this year that the social distance guidelines he advocated for were not based on science. According to Dr. Fauci, the six-feet social distancing recommendation “just sort of appeared.” Additionally, the former public health official confessed that the COVID lab leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory.

show less
Former director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Francis Collins is admitting the stringently enforced social-distancing measures endorsed by top health agencies were not underpinned by firm scientific evidence. The revelation came in closed-door testimony earlier this year before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. show more

NPR Editor Makes Stunning Admission Over Left-Wing Bias.

A senior editor at National Public Radio (NPR) says the outlet’s response to the election of then-President Donald Trump and the death of George Floyd — and subsequent riots — transformed the news organization for the worse. Uri Berliner, a senior business editor, admits NPR has always been liberal, but contends it used to foster an “open-minded, curious culture.” In contrast, its reaction to Trump and the post-Floyd panic regarding “systemic racism” caused its tone to become “knee-jerk, activist, [and] scolding.”

HOOKED ON SCHIFF.

Berliner claims NPR initially began its descent into extreme ideological bias after becoming one of the primary outlets pushing Rep. Adam Schiff‘s (D-CA) conspiracy theory that the 2016 Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to rig the U.S. presidential election. “By my count, NPR hosts interviewed Schiff 25 times about Trump and Russia. During many of those conversations, Schiff alluded to purported evidence of collusion,” Berliner writes, adding: “The Schiff talking points became the drumbeat of NPR news reports.”

Despite investing a lot of time in coverage of Rep. Schiff’s claims, the outlet gave little attention to the fact that multiple investigations exonerated Trump of the California Democrat’s charges. “But when the Mueller report found no credible evidence of collusion, NPR’s coverage was notably sparse. Russiagate quietly faded from our programming,” the business editor says.

THE LAPTOP FROM HELL.

In another instance of editorial malpractice, Berliner details how NPR failed to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story. At the time, the news organization stated, “We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories.” Further, NPR said stories covering the laptop were “pure distractions.” Berliner, however, admits that “Its contents revealed [Hunter Biden’s] connection to the corrupt world of multimillion-dollar influence peddling and its possible implications for his father.”

Berliner described an editorial meeting as follows: “I listened as one of NPR’s best and most fair-minded journalists said it was good we weren’t following the laptop story because it could help Trump.”

COVID-19 PROPAGANDISTS.

Taking on NPR’s coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, Berliner says its editorial staff quickly decided that the ‘natural origin’ theory was correct and that the ‘lab leak’ theory was either “racist or a right-wing conspiracy theory.” According to Berliner, the internal stance on COVID-19 was partly prompted by the outlet implicitly trusting the word of Anthony Fauci and former NIH head Francis Collins.

‘ENDING SYSTEMIC RACISM.’

The business editor says former CEO John Lansing enabled the internal cultural changes and editorial bias. Following the death of George Floyd, Berliner recounts how Lansing, rather than challenging staff to explore whether systemic racism was prevalent in America, tasked the news organization with “identifying and ending systemic racism.” Following Lansing’s “systemic racism” challenge, the organization was overtaken by racial affinity groups who pushed for tailored, niche coverage — increasingly alienated listeners and readers alike.

While Berliner insists that he believes NPR can be saved from itself, he does lament that “[w]ith declining ratings, sorry levels of trust, and an audience that has become less diverse over time, the trajectory for NPR is not promising.”

show less
A senior editor at National Public Radio (NPR) says the outlet's response to the election of then-President Donald Trump and the death of George Floyd — and subsequent riots — transformed the news organization for the worse. Uri Berliner, a senior business editor, admits NPR has always been liberal, but contends it used to foster an "open-minded, curious culture." In contrast, its reaction to Trump and the post-Floyd panic regarding "systemic racism" caused its tone to become "knee-jerk, activist, [and] scolding." show more

WATCH: Fauci’s COVID Boss, NIH Chief Francis Collins, Confesses Lockdown Damage Was ‘Another Mistake We Made’.

“If you’re a public health person, and you’re trying to make a decision, you have this very narrow view of what the right decision is, and that is something that will save a life,” former National Institutes of Health (NIH) chief Francis Collins recently told an audience. The Obama appointee, who left office in late 2022 after 13 years in his position, admitted further:

“Doesn’t matter what else happens. You attach infinite value to stopping the disease and saving a life. You attach zero value to whether this actually totally disrupts people’s lives, ruins the economy, and has many kids kept out of school in a way that they never might quite recover from. Collateral damage. This is a public health mindset. And I think a lot of us involved in trying to make those recommendations had that mindset – and that was really unfortunate. It’s another mistake we made.”

The admission is stunning given the warnings from anti-lockdown advocates during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the claims from NIH officials and others that they were simply “following the science,” and that those worried about knock-on effects were conspiracy theorists or deathmongers.

WATCH:

show less
"If you're a public health person, and you're trying to make a decision, you have this very narrow view of what the right decision is, and that is something that will save a life," former National Institutes of Health (NIH) chief Francis Collins recently told an audience. The Obama appointee, who left office in late 2022 after 13 years in his position, admitted further: show more