GET THE APP
Friday, September 11, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

1 hour ago
News

LISTEN: Kassam Remembers Charlie Kirk on First Anniversary of His Assassination.

Raheem Kassam, Editor-in-Chief of The National Pulse, shared his memories of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, one year on from his assassination in Utah.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The National Pulse Editor-in-Chief Raheem Kassam spoke to Times Radio about the first anniversary of Charlie Kirk’s assassination during an open-air debate in Utah, remembering him as a “political superstar” whose presence is sorely missed.
📰 DETAIL: Kirk founded Turning Point USA (TPUSA) at the age of 18, quickly becoming a leading voice in conservative circles. Kassam discussed Kirk’s debate skills, the numerous conspiracy theories surrounding his killing, ranging from allegations of foreign involvement to internal betrayal, and especially his willingness to engage with young people beyond the conservative movement, in hopes of both winning converts and showing that his positions could withstand scrutiny.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “He didn’t believe in safe spaces at all… He actively went on to university campuses and engaged hostile audiences constantly. Unfortunately, that was also his end. His security team, the people around him, would always encourage him to have a glass screen in front of him. They received hundreds and hundreds of death threats every time they went onto a major university campus or embarked upon a major tour. But he refused. He said if I’m not accessible to people, then there’s no point in doing this at all.” – Raheem Kassam
🎯 IMPACT: Kirk’s intensified public scrutiny of left-wing political violence in the U.S. and the safety of public figures, especially those with conservative views.
👀 FLASHBACK: Kirk’s rise to prominence began with the founding of Turning Point USA, which became a huge force in conservative activism, particularly among young Americans. His close ties with President Donald J. Trump further cemented his legacy in the MAGA movement.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

4 minutes ago
Health
News
UK

Lawmakers Vote Down Euthanasia Bill.

British Members of Parliament (MPs) have voted against the introduction of “assisted dying” (euthanasia), citing safeguarding concerns and the state of palliative care.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: British MPs have voted against a landmark bill that would have introduced so-called “assisted dying,” a woke rebrand of assisted suicide, or euthanasia.
📺 DETAIL: On Friday, British MPs voted against the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, with 270 MPs voting for the bill while 286 MPs voted against. The bill would have allowed those aged 18 and older in England and Wales with an estimated six months or less to live to request assistance to end their own lives. Support and opposition cut across conventional party lines, as it was a free vote of conscience, in which MPs are not bound by the party political whipping system. Euthanasia has proven highly controversial due to concerns about safeguarding. Specifically, opponents of the bill have argued that the bill’s safeguarding requirements would not reliably detect coercion and abuse. Opponents of the proposal have also questioned the decision to introduce assisted dying while Britain’s palliative care system remains underfunded.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Well done Parliament and congrats to all campaigners who have worked so hard for so long in defence of the most vulnerable. Now let’s fix palliative care.” — Danny Kruger, Reform UK MP for East Wiltshire, on X (formerly Twitter).
🎯 IMPACT: The results prevent the legalization of euthanasia. This represents a major blow to the campaigners who supported the bill. The decision to vote against assisted dying bucks a trend seen across multiple Western countries, with several opting to implement the controversial practice in recent years.
📺 FLASHBACK: Back in 2024, British MPs voted in favor of assisted dying by 330 votes to 275 at the Bill’s Second Reading. The Bill subsequently passed through several further stages in the House of Commons, but it ran out of parliamentary time while being reviewed by the House of Lords, the upper chamber of the Houses of Parliament. As a result, the Bill had to be reintroduced from the start of the process. When it was first introduced, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage voted against it. “I voted against the assisted dying bill, not out of a lack of compassion but because I fear that the law will widen in scope. If that happens, the right to die may become the obligation to die,” posted Farage on X at the time.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

British Members of Parliament (MPs) have voted against the introduction of "assisted dying" (euthanasia), citing safeguarding concerns and the state of palliative care.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
Immigration
NatSec
News

ICE Has Deported Over 2,000 Known or Suspected Terrorists Since Trump’s Return to Office.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has arrested over 2,100 terrorists and suspected terrorists under the second Trump administration, with a similar number deported over the course of the year.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has deported over 2,000 terrorists and suspected terrorists since President Donald J. Trump returned to office, according to new data.
📺 DETAIL: According to data released by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), between January 20, 2025, and September 9, 2026, ICE arrested more than 2,150 foreign nationals suspected of terrorism. The data also revealed that 2,015 were deported during that period. This follows data showing that the agency made a record 50,925 arrests last month. This constituted the highest monthly total in ICE’s history, and followed two consecutive months of ICE making a record-breaking number of arrests. “The hard-working men and women of DHS continue to break records as they defend the homeland and protect the American people,” said Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin at the time. “Our job every single day is to make sure we are looking at the entire picture of the threats facing the Homeland, and we have GREAT men and women, 270,000 people that do it every day,” he said. The recent batch of arrests is likely to send a strong message to potential terrorists seeking to enter the U.S, especially as the report comes on the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks.
🎯 IMPACT: The new figures reflect the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to arrest and deport illegal immigrants, especially those convicted of severe crimes. These actions underscore the role of immigration enforcement in preventing terrorism in the U.S. This represents the domestic front in the federal government’s crackdown on terrorism. In recent weeks, the Trump administration has also made moves to crack down harder on narco-terrorist operations importing drugs into the country from Latin America. For example, on Wednesday, the U.S military sank six large vessels used for refueling smaller drug-smuggling boats off the coast of Ecuador. “These interdictions cut off critical nodes in the narcotics logistics network,” read a statement from U.S. Southern Command.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has arrested over 2,100 terrorists and suspected terrorists under the second Trump administration, with a similar number deported over the course of the year.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
Immigration
News

Socialist Spain is Granting EU Citizenship to Hundreds of Thousands of Africans as ‘Historic Reparation.’

Spain’s move to grant citizenship to Sahrawis born under its colonial rule has sparked debate over reparations, migration policy, and the consequences of the socialist-led country’s actions for the wider European Union.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Socialist-led Spain is advancing legislation granting Spanish citizenship to potentially hundreds of thousands of Sahrawis whose families were connected to the territory of Western Sahara when it was under Spanish administration. The proposal would cover Sahrawis born during Spanish rule and potentially their direct descendants, with Spanish media reporting that as many as 200,000 people in Western Sahara, Algeria’s refugee camps, and the diaspora could qualify. Significantly, Spanish citizenship is also European Union (EU) citizenship, meaning the Sahrawis could easily migrate onward to the bloc’s other 26 members.
📺 DETAIL: Spain withdrew from Western Sahara in 1976, after which Morocco took control of roughly 80 percent of the disputed territory, while the Polisario Front has continued to campaign for an independent Sahrawi state. Supporters describe the measure as a long-overdue historical “reparation” for people who were born under Spanish colonial rule. If approved, successful applicants would gain the right to live, work, and study in Spain and to move freely throughout the borderless Schengen Area, which encompasses much of Europe. The proposal could be particularly significant for Sahrawis living in Algeria’s Tindouf refugee camps, where many have faced statelessness for decades. The move comes as Spain faces heightened tensions over migration, including a mass influx into the Spanish city of Ceuta and a mass amnesty for illegal immigrants. 
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This isn’t a normal administrative concession… but rather a historical reparation.” – Brahim Hameyada, director of the Unamuno Academy in Dakhla
🎯 IMPACT: The proposed citizenship law could have major implications for Spanish and European migration and foreign policy, potentially giving vast numbers of Sahrawis access to the entire EU. It could also strain relations with Morocco and add another politically sensitive issue to an already contentious debate over migration, border security, and Spain’s relationship with North Africa.

Image © European Union, 1998 – 2026.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Spain's move to grant citizenship to Sahrawis born under its colonial rule has sparked debate over reparations, migration policy, and the consequences of the socialist-led country's actions for the wider European Union.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

4 hours ago
News
Politics

WATCH: RFK Jr Accuses the Democrats of ‘Obliterating’ the Bill of Rights.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a scathing critique of the Democratic Party at the 2026 Texas Republican convention, accusing it of abandoning constitutional principles and embracing censorship.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sharply criticized his former party during a speech at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, Texas, accusing the Democrats of abandoning the principles that once defined the party of his father and uncle. Kennedy said the Democrats had “obliterated the Bill of Rights,” particularly the First Amendment, during the COVID-19 pandemic under the former Biden regime.
📺 DETAIL: Kennedy accused the Democrats of suppressing speech they deemed misinformation, closing churches, shutting down businesses, requiring Americans to disclose medical information, and pressuring people to receive COVID-19 vaccines. He also criticized what he described as a focus on protecting the interests of pharmaceutical corporations, and said his own social media accounts were censored during the pandemic. He contrasted the current Democratic Party with the one associated with his father, Robert F. Kennedy Sr., and uncle, former President John F. Kennedy, saying they had supported free speech, competitive markets, and meritocracy, and opposed both crony capitalism and socialism. He recalled launching his 2024 presidential campaign as an effort to bring Democrats back to their traditional values, but said he ultimately concluded that the party had lost faith in voters and American democracy.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “The Democratic Party became a party of elites, labeling working Americans as deplorable.” – Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
🎯 IMPACT: Kennedy’s speech underscores how his break with the Democratic Party has become part of the Republican effort to define the 2026 midterms around the Democrats’ lurch to the left, with Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) figures such as Zohran Mamdani and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez now among its most prominent elected officials. 

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a scathing critique of the Democratic Party at the 2026 Texas Republican convention, accusing it of abandoning constitutional principles and embracing censorship.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

5 hours ago
Corruption
Immigration
News

Top Court Reprimands Judge for Aiding Immigrant’s Escape from ICE.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has formally reprimanded Judge Shelley Joseph over her involvement in a case where an illegal immigrant evaded ICE custody, citing her actions as creating an appearance of impropriety.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued a public reprimand to Judge Shelley Joseph for her role in allowing illegal immigrant Jose Medina-Perez to evade Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody by exiting through a back door of the courthouse in 2018. The court cited her decision to instruct a clerk to turn off the courtroom’s audio recording system as creating an appearance of impropriety and violating judicial duties.
📺 DETAIL: Medina-Perez, a Dominican national, was in court for a fugitive-from-justice charge and two drug-related charges. Judge Joseph released him on personal recognizance after determining insufficient evidence tied him to the Pennsylvania warrant. During a sidebar conversation, she proposed detaining him overnight but ultimately allowed him to leave. His attorney had devised a plan to evade ICE custody. Joseph and a court officer were later federally indicted for obstruction of justice in 2019, though those charges were dropped in 2022 after she referred herself to the Commission on Judicial Conduct, which found her actions prejudicial to the administration of justice.
🎯 IMPACT: Judge Joseph, who was suspended from the bench for three years following her federal indictment, remains a judge but has been reassigned to administrative duties. The case has reignited debates over judicial accountability, particularly with respect to state courts’ interactions with federal immigration enforcement.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Judge Joseph is thankful for everyone who stood by her and looks forward to rejoining her colleagues.” – Elizabeth Mulvey, Joseph’s attorney
📺 FLASHBACK: The 2018 incident drew national attention, as it occurred amid heightened tensions over immigration enforcement under the first Trump administration.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has formally reprimanded Judge Shelley Joseph over her involvement in a case where an illegal immigrant evaded ICE custody, citing her actions as creating an appearance of impropriety.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

18 hours ago
Immigration
Lawfare
SCOTUS

ICE Detention Policy Heading to SCOTUS After Being Compared to Japanese Internment by Biden Judge.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down ICE’s detention policy, setting the stage for a Supreme Court review.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policy on detaining migrants without bond, comparing it to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. The decision marks the ninth consecutive loss for ICE in federal appeals courts regarding this policy.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Mass detention of marginalized individuals without due process harkens back to some of the darkest moments in our country’s history,” complained Joe Biden appointee Judge Nicole Berner, joined by Barack Obama appointee Judge Barbara Keenan in a 2-1 opinion.
🎯 IMPACT: The ruling sets the stage for the Supreme Court to address the legality of ICE’s detention policy, which has been a point of contention for multiple federal courts. The decision could have significant implications for immigration enforcement in the U.S.
📰 DETAIL: The policy in question was a shift by ICE in July 2025, which expanded mandatory detention to migrants residing in the U.S. for years, stopping them from being left among the public at large while their claims work their way through the courts. This change led to numerous lawfare suits, with over 460 largely but not exclusively liberal federal judges opposing the policy. In comparison, a little over 50 have backed the policy.
👀 FLASHBACK: The 1996 immigration reform law which ICE’s policy is based on was initially interpreted to require detention of recent border crossers, not long-term residents. The Trump administration’s reinterpretation has been widely contested in the courts by pro-migrant activists.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down ICE's detention policy, setting the stage for a Supreme Court review.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

18 hours ago
Bonkers Britain
News

UK Govt Feared ‘Extreme Right’ Would ‘Push Pro-Free Speech Narratives’ After Charlie Kirk Assassination.

A leaked memo reveals a British government’s counter-extremism unit monitored Charlie Kirk supporters after his assassination and downplayed left-wing reactions to his assassination.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Newly disclosed documents show that a British government counter-extremism unit closely monitored online reactions to Charlie Kirk’s assassination on September 10, 2025, and assessed its potential impact on political discourse. A September 11, 2025 memo produced by the Home Office’s Research, Information, and Communications Unit (RICU), classified as “Official Sensitive,” examined social media activity from groups it labeled “Extreme Right-Wing,” “Left-Wing and Single Issue,” and Islamists.
📰 DETAIL: RICU identified about 2,000 posts from the so-called “Extreme Right-Wing” discussing Kirk’s assassination in the memo, uncovered by independent reporter Steven Edginton, including 557 posts across 6,385 channels monitored in Britain. Officials said right-wing activists were likely to portray the assassination as an attack on conservatives and warned that figures including Tommy Robinson could use it to “push pro-free speech narratives.” RICU also monitored Turning Point UK, the British offshoot of Kirk’s Turning Point USA organization. The memo initially characterized left-wing reactions as “moderate”, but later acknowledged that responses had “broadly been celebratory,” including memes mocking Kirk’s death and posts highlighting his support for gun rights. Sarah Rogers, a U.S. State Department official who previously represented Kirk on First Amendment matters, along with Alliance Defending Freedom counsel Lorcán Price and Free Speech Union director Lord  Toby Young, questioned why British counter-extremism officials were monitoring lawful political responses to Kirk’s assassination.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “There is nothing ‘extreme’ about ‘pushing pro free speech narratives.’” – Sarah Rogers, Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy
🎯 IMPACT: Free speech advocates criticized RICU for labeling right-wing activity as “Extreme Right-Wing” while using the less severe “Left-Wing and Single Issue” designation for left-wing activity, arguing that the distinction reflects a double standard and deep-seated government bias. “This memo clearly shows that RICU was monitoring lawful speech from British citizens raising reasonable concerns—such as that Left-wing accounts celebrated Mr Kirk’s murder online,” observed Alliance Defending Freedom legal counsel Lorcán Price.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A leaked memo reveals a British government's counter-extremism unit monitored Charlie Kirk supporters after his assassination and downplayed left-wing reactions to his assassination.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

19 hours ago
Health
News

Trump Announces $500 Refunds for Americans ‘Ripped Off’ by Obamacare.

President Donald J. Trump has unveiled a plan to issue $500 refunds to nearly one million Americans overcharged under Obamacare, with checks expected just ahead of the midterm elections.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump has announced that nearly one million Americans in 30 states will receive $500 refunds due to overcharges under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
📺 DETAIL: U.S. citizens in the states of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Delaware, New Hampshire, Texas, Wisconsin, South Carolina, Michigan, Ohio, Mississippi, and Missouri are expected to be the primary recipients. President Trump described the policy as reimbursement for being “wrongly ripped off” by the ACA, also known as Obamacare. The policy is part of the Trump administration’s proposed “Great Health Care Plan,” which aims to reduce premiums by providing direct payments to citizens. The money for refunds will be drawn from a $500 million fund of excess fees collected from ACA enrollees. The refunds will be issued shortly before the midterm elections. This follows the end of ACA’s enhanced premium subsidies, which expired at the end of last year.
🎯 IMPACT: The refunds are expected to provide financial relief to Americans facing rising healthcare costs. This suggests that the Trump administration is increasingly focused on affordability, an issue which Americans regularly rank as a top political priority. The refunds may serve as an incentive to vote Republican in the midterm elections, which are scheduled for November. The policy is likely to be well-received by Americans most impacted by the expiration of ACA premium subsidies.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Our administration has discovered that under Sleepy Joe Biden, American households buying health insurance through the Obamacare exchange, which is a disaster, and the Healthcare.gov [website], were massively overcharged, to put it mildly… Our administration is doing the right thing in giving the money back to the people who were wrongly ripped off,” said President Trump in a video posted to X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday.
📺 FLASHBACK: According to federal data published earlier this year, Obamacare enrollment dropped by 2.9 million in February. The drop in enrollment has been attributed to the Trump administration’s crackdown on insurance fraud, which forms part of a wider crackdown on waste, fraud, and abuse across government.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

President Donald J. Trump has unveiled a plan to issue $500 refunds to nearly one million Americans overcharged under Obamacare, with checks expected just ahead of the midterm elections.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

20 hours ago
News
Politics
UK

Trump-Hating Politician Planning Bid to Follow Sadiq Khan as London Mayor.

Anti-Trump former Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy is allegedly planning to run for London Mayor if current Mayor Sadiq Khan stands down.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Anti-Trump Labour Member of Parliament (MP) David Lammy is reportedly floating a run for London Mayor.
📺 DETAIL: On Thursday, it was reported that David Lammy, the former Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary under former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, is considering a run for London Mayor. This follows reports earlier this month that Lammy could seek the Labour Party nomination if the incumbent, Sadiq Khan, stands down before the next mayoral election. Lammy allegedly hosted a SME4Labour (Small and Medium Enterprises for Labour) fundraising dinner on Wednesday night as a testing ground for a future mayoral bid. However, when pressed on the purpose of the event, Lammy claimed that the funds would go towards defending his Tottenham seat at the next general election. The former Deputy Prime Minister did not officially rule out running. “I am not sure he can even count on support from his local party in Tottenham for his future ambitions in London,” said a Labour Party source. Lammy is known for his extreme opposition to President Donald J. Trump. Lammy has characterized the U.S. President as a “neo-Nazi sympathizing sociopath” and a “racist KKK and Nazi sympathizer.” He has also referred to the MAGA movement as a “cult of white supremacists.”
🎯 IMPACT: If Lammy decides to run, this will be his second run for London Mayor, having first sought to become the Labour candidate for the 2016 mayoral election. Lammy ultimately lost the nomination to Khan and placed fourth. In the event that Khan does stand down and Lammy manages to get the Labour nomination, there is a good chance that he will be elected as the next Mayor of London in 2028. This could further drive a wedge between the British capital and the U.S. President, who has repeatedly criticized Khan’s leadership.
📺 FLASHBACK: Prime Minister Andy Burnham endorsed Khan for a historic fourth term as London Mayor earlier this month. This is despite the fact that the vast majority of Londoners want him to resign. Specifically, according to a recent poll by YouGov, 56 percent of Londoners believe that Khan should step down as Mayor, including 31 percent of Londoners who voted for him in 2024. “He’s a disaster. He’s got a totally different ideology to what he’s supposed to have,” said President Trump regarding the Mayor last year.

Image via House of Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Anti-Trump former Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy is allegedly planning to run for London Mayor if current Mayor Sadiq Khan stands down.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

22 hours ago
News
Politics
World

European Union Mulls Punishing German Region for Electing Populists.

The European Union is contemplating withholding funds from Saxony-Anhalt following Alternative for Germany’s win in its regional elections, alleging potential breaches of EU principles.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The European Union (EU) is considering freezing funds allocated to Saxony-Anhalt after the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party’s election victory in the region.
📰 DETAIL: On Sunday, the AfD won its first state-wide victory ever in Saxony-Anhalt, as support for Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s notionally center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) plummeted. The AfD won almost 44 percent of the vote but fell three seats short of a majority in the Landtag, equivalent to a U.S. state legislature. Saxony-Anhalt is set to receive €2.95 billion (~$3.4 billion) from the EU’s 2021-27 budget. However, Daniel Freund, a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) from the Greens, a left-wing European party, has pushed to withhold the funds from the region. Freund argued that funds should be withheld from the region if an AfD-controlled state government legislates in a way contrary to so-called EU values. The EU has previously withheld funds from Hungary and Poland under similar circumstances.
🎯 IMPACT: Freezing EU funds could significantly affect Saxony-Anhalt’s regional development, impacting public infrastructure and services. The AfD has dismissed the EU’s potential actions as undemocratic, characterizing the idea as punishing the voters of Saxony-Anhalt. If the EU opts to freeze funds to the region or attempts to override state government decisions through financial pressure, this could increase hostility towards the EU and bolster support for the AfD. It is also possible that the EU goes ahead with defunding the region in order to slight President Donald J. Trump, who congratulated the AfD on their win earlier this week. “Wow! The Populist Party in Germany just had a really big night… THEY ARE ON THE RISE, and not going to take it anymore! MGGA!!!” wrote President Donald J. Trump on Truth Social
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We laugh at our partisan opponents, who are now also seeking to disadvantage us undemocratically at EU level.” – Bernd Baumann, AfD parliamentary managing director.

Image CC-BY-4.0: © European Union 2023– Source: EP.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The European Union is contemplating withholding funds from Saxony-Anhalt following Alternative for Germany's win in its regional elections, alleging potential breaches of EU principles.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad