One of the oft-discussed Vice Presidential nominee picks for President Donald Trump is failing to register in The National Pulse’s straw poll of readers. Senator Marcio Rubio, mooted by the media as a top Trump pick, is currently polling at 0.8 percent amongst the MAGA faithful. The poll shows Senator J.D. Vance in with a whopping lead of 31 percent, with his closest competitor, Vivek Ramaswamy, on 15 percent.
Hot on Vivek’s heels is former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson, with 13.6 percent, followed by Florida Congressman Byron Donalds on 10.2 percent.
The list, below, is not a comprehensive list of everyone who has been floated for the position, and even excludes some National Pulse favorites in an attempt to reflect the currently 12 candidates being considered by President Trump and his operation.
Donald’s Dozen, as The National Pulse has named them, also reveals a skepticism over Senator Tom Cotton (0.6 percent) and Senator Katie Britt (0.1 percent).
Voting closes on Monday, May 6th.
If you have trouble seeing the poll, please use the website, rather than the Pulse+ app.
show less
One of the oft-discussed Vice Presidential nominee picks for President Donald Trump is failing to register in The National Pulse's straw poll of readers. Senator Marcio Rubio, mooted by the media as a top Trump pick, is currently polling at 0.8 percent amongst the MAGA faithful. The poll shows Senator J.D. Vance in with a whopping lead of 31 percent, with his closest competitor, Vivek Ramaswamy, on 15 percent.
show more
Editor’s Notes
Behind-the-scenes political intrigue exclusively for Pulse+ subscribers.
The left-wing media is now arguing that animals should be considered legal persons and that the “violence” of so-called “ecocide” should be a punishable offense in international law and civil and criminal codes. Writing in the far-left magazine The New Republic, Lydia Millet argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United offers the legal precedent to enact such laws.
“Both domestically and internationally, species and ecosystems need to be endowed with legal standing to give local and native stewards the tools to save them from the depredations of industry in the short term and sustain them over the long,” writes Millet. “Accountability for the violence of what some call ‘ecocide’ should be embedded in international law and civil and criminal codes.”
“Luckily, bestowing legal standing on extra-human parties isn’t a fanciful idea,” she writes. “The U.S. Supreme Court did exactly that in the 2010 case known as Citizens United, when it declared that corporations were legal persons—a decision that hobbled American democracy but also set a neat precedent for extending legal personhood to nonhuman entities. And corporations are clearly more abstract and disembodied than animals.”
A GLOBAL MOVEMENT?
Millet also points to the fact that other nations have begun classifying nature and animals as legal persons.
“In New Zealand, a river and a rainforest have been awarded personhood; the people of Ecuador, in 2008, voted to modify their Constitution to recognize the right of nature to exist and flourish; in the United States, the Yurok tribe gave personhood to the Klamath River under tribal law in 2019; and in 2010 Pittsburgh became the first major city to recognize the rights of nature. Those rights have also been enacted into law or invoked by courts in Bolivia, Panama, and India.”
What Millet fails to address is the inevitable implications of declaring animals and natural geographic features legal persons that could have catastrophic effects on human society. Were such blanket measures enacted, hunting, fishing, and farming as we know it might all become illegal. Indeed, current efforts by the Biden regime to “protect” the environment using already available means are predicted to impact energy costs dramatically and will have dire consequences for Americans’ standard of living.
Observers may also note the inherent irony of The New Republic, which appears to publish at least one article per day in favor of the “right” to abortion, arguing that animals are entitled to legal personhood protections while actual baby persons are not.
show less
The left-wing media is now arguing that animals should be considered legal persons and that the "violence" of so-called "ecocide" should be a punishable offense in international law and civil and criminal codes. Writing in the far-left magazine The New Republic, Lydia Millet argues that the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United offers the legal precedent to enact such laws.
show more
Donald J. Trump‘s presidential campaign and the Republican National Committee (RNC) are suing the Nevada Secretary of State to prevent counting mail-in ballots received after election day. Nevada election law allows ballots received up to four days after an election to be counted.
“Nevada’s ballot receipt deadline clearly violates federal law and undermines election integrity in the state,” RNC co-chairman Michael Whatley said in a statement. He added: “[T]he RNC and our partners are suing to secure an honest election, support Nevada voters, and oppose unlawful schemes.”
“Congress has established a uniform, national day to elect members of Congress and to appoint presidential electors,” attorneys for the RNC and Trump campaign contend in their lawsuit filed with the U.S. District Court of Nevada. “Nevada effectively extends Nevada’s federal election past the Election Day established by Congress,” the lawsuit argues.
“Nevada runs some of the most secure, transparent, and accessible elections in the country,” Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar (D) said, defending the state’s mail-in voting policy. “The key for that accessibility is allowing working Nevadans to vote using the method that works best for them, including voting by mail,” Aguilar continued before adding: “Our office will not comment on ongoing litigation, but I hope the RNC is putting as much time and energy into educating voters on how to participate in elections as they put into suing the state of Nevada.”
The Nevada mail-in ballot law challenge is one of 83 election integritylawsuits the RNC has filed in 25 states ahead of November’s presidential election. Fewer than 34,000 votes separated former President Trump from JoeBiden in Nevada’s 2020 presidential election.
show less
Donald J. Trump's presidential campaign and the Republican National Committee (RNC) are suing the Nevada Secretary of State to prevent counting mail-in ballots received after election day. Nevada election law allows ballots received up to four days after an election to be counted.
show more
Following a lawsuit from conservative legal nonprofit America First Legal (AFL), the Biden government has agreed to disband the Homeland Intelligence Experts Group. The group, formed by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, consisted of individuals from the private sector designated to give insights on the government’s intelligence and national security endeavors.
Critics contended that the board was more partisan than neutral, expressing concerns over the involvement of figures such as James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence, and John Brennan, former CIA Director. Both had previously signed a letter questioning the truth behind the Hunter Biden laptop story.
“As a result of our lawsuit in federal court, DHS is surrendering in total to our demands: they are closing down their new partisan intelligence board featuring Clapper and Brennan — which would have been used to promote censored, unethical spying, and gross civil rights invasions of political enemies — and they are surrendering their documents, handing them over to our possession. We won. We beat Biden and DHS,” said AFL President Stephen Miller.
America First Legal, which also represented former acting Director of National Intelligence Ric Grennell in the lawsuit, found that among the political donations made by those appointed to the group, a mere one percent went to Republicans, while 98 percent favored Democrats. Filed in November, the lawsuit accused the group of violating the Federal Advisory Committee Act, citing an alleged bias, a lack of public transparency, and undue influence by the Biden regime.
Although DHS denied any violation, it has agreed to dissolve the group. As per the agreement, the Homeland Intelligence Experts Group will be wound down within 30 days, with no future meetings scheduled and no reconstitution of the group inconsistent with federal law.
show less
Following a lawsuit from conservative legal nonprofit America First Legal (AFL), the Biden government has agreed to disband the Homeland Intelligence Experts Group. The group, formed by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, consisted of individuals from the private sector designated to give insights on the government’s intelligence and national security endeavors.
show more
Noncitizens are voting in U.S. elections despite the Bidengovernment and corporatemedia claims to the contrary — and are three times more likely to vote for the Democrats. Noncitizens are often able to register and cast ballots due to negligence by election workers or registration drives sponsored by government agencies. A series of criminal cases involving ballots cast by immigrants in North Carolina has revealed some concerning data regarding the frequency of noncitizen voting and which political party they often support.
Federal prosecutors have brought charges against 37 noncitizens who voted in North Carolina’s 2016 election. By a three-to-one ratio, these individuals supported Democrats over Republican candidates. The noncitizens cast 99 ballots in multiple elections dating back as far as 1996. Most of the noncitizen voters only participated in federal elections, with only a handful of ballots cast in local races.
According to one of the federal attorneys who handled most of the North Carolina prosecutions, election officials appeared to register noncitizens they believed would likely support Democrat candidates. In one instance, a noncitizen’s voter registration was accepted only after it became clear he intended to vote for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
One of the noncitizens charged, Eloy Alberto Zayas-Berrier, has been in the United States since 1980. Zayas arrived as part of the Mariel boatlift, which saw over 100,000 Cuban nationals land on American shores. In 2016, Zayas showed up at an early voting location and presented his government-issued work permit to an election worker who allowed him to register as a Democrat and cast a ballot.
A recent incident in South Carolina saw a noncitizen receive multiple voter registration forms after filing for public assistance with the state’s Medicaid office.
show less
Noncitizens are voting in U.S. elections despite the Bidengovernment and corporatemedia claims to the contrary — and are three times more likely to vote for the Democrats. Noncitizens are often able to register and cast ballots due to negligence by election workers or registration drives sponsored by government agencies. A series of criminal cases involving ballots cast by immigrants in North Carolina has revealed some concerning data regarding the frequency of noncitizen voting and which political party they often support.
show more
Hope Hicks, a former aide to and campaign press secretary for former President Donald J. Trump, took the stand on day seven of Trump’s Manhattan-based ‘hush money’ trial. Former Biden Department of Justice attorney MatthewColangelo — who has a long history of engaging in partisan lawfare against conservatives — handled questioning for the prosecution.
Throughout the day, the prosecution probed Hicks on her relationship with various individuals in Trump‘s orbit, including business associates and campaign staff. Later, District Attorney Alvin Bragg‘s team moved on to the Trump campaign’s response to the Access Hollywood tape before then addressing the alleged Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal affairs.
The prosecution spent most of the morning establishing Hicks’s relationship with the former President, his family, and other members of his inner circle. Colangelo’s questioning focused heavily on the former press secretary’s role in the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. The prosecutor was especially interested in Hicks’s knowledge of and interactions with Michael Cohen, David Pecker, Rhona Graff, and ex-Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg.
Hicks told Colangelo that former President Trump was “very involved” in the day-to-day of his 2016 presidential campaign. Colangelo next pressed her on Michael Cohen and Allen Weisselberg’s roles in the campaign and the Trump Organization. Regarding Cohen, Hicks said she wasn’t sure. “I know he was involved in a couple of the licenses deals for some of the hotel projects and maybe some of the entertainment pieces as well, like Miss Universe pageant,” the former Trump aide responded.
Colangelo next asked Hicks about Allen Weisselberg and what campaign role he played. According to Hicks, the former Trump Organization CFO mainly just assisted with the personal financial disclosure that Trump had to file ahead of the election. When asked about Trump’s relationship with Weisselberg, Hicks acknowledged, “He was a trusted person there.”
Hicks went on to testify that David Pecker and Donald Trump were indeed friends. She noted that she joined the former President for his phone calls with the tabloid newsman. When asked if she was present for the 2015 meeting between Trump and Pecker at Trump Tower, she said, “I don’t have a recollection of that.” Pecker testified last week that Hicks had been in and out of that meeting.
THE ACCESS HOLLYWOOD TAPE.
Just before the lunch break, Colangelo moved on to Hicks’s role regarding the 2016 Trump campaign’s response to the Access Hollywood tape. The infamous video, in which the former President engages in “locker room talk,” appears to be part of the prosecution’s strategy to paint Trump as someone who participates in crude and lascivious behavior.
Hicks recalled the tape being very upsetting to Trump. “He said that didn’t sound like something he would say,” she testified, adding that the former President wanted to see the actual video. She continued, stating the campaign viewed the tape as “damaging” and a “crisis.”
Colangelo pressed Hicks further on Trump’s response after viewing the tape. She responded that the former President “didn’t want to offend anybody.” However, Hicks added, “I think he felt like it was pretty standard stuff for two guys chatting with each other.”
After the tape had become public, Hicks said there were rumors of another video “that would be problematic for the campaign.” Hicks told Colangelo that she asked Michael Cohen to look into the matter. “There was no such tape, regardless, but he chased that down for me,” she said.
THE STORMY DANIELS STORY.
Following lunch, Colangelo moved on to the Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal affair accusations. At this stage, the prosecution hoped to elicit testimony suggesting Trump was concerned about how accusations would impact his campaign just days before the 2016 election. However, that is not what happened.
Hicks said the November 4, 2016, Wall Street Journal story was the first time she became aware of Karen McDougal. She acknowledged that she had heard Story Daniels’s name once before, stating that several security guards on Trump’s plane mentioned her name in 2015 while discussing attendees at a celebrity gold tournament.
After the story broke, Hicks said she reached out to Michael Cohen. “Michael sort of feigned like he didn’t know what I was talking about,” she said.
Addressing the campaign response to the Daniels and McDougal stories, Hicks said former President Trump “wanted to know the context, and he wanted to make sure that there was a denial of any kind of relationship.” She added that Trump wanted to make it “absolutely, unequivocally” clear that he never had a relationship with Daniels.
‘TRUMP MORE CONCERNED ABOUT MELANIA.’
In the most damning moment of the day for District Attorney Bragg‘s prosecution, Hicks unequivocally stated that Trump was solely concerned about how the Stormy Daniels story would impact his family — especially his wife, Melania. “He was concerned about the story. He was concerned about how it would be viewed by his wife, and he wanted me to make sure that the newspapers weren’t delivered to his residence that morning,” Hicks said.
Hicks’s statement directly undermines the prosecution’s assertion that the financial payments to Daniels and McDougal were meant to prevent negative press that would impact his campaign. However, she acknowledged that the story concerned those within the presidential campaign’s inner circle. “Everything we talked about in the context of this time period and this time frame was about whether or not there was an impact on the campaign,” Hicks told Colangelo.
Next, Trump‘s defense attorney, Emil Bove, began his cross-examination. He asked Hicks about the former President’s relationship with his wife. “President Trump really values Mrs. Trump’s opinion, and she doesn’t weigh in all the time, but when she does, it’s really meaningful to him and, you know, he really really respects what she has to say,” she responded. At this point, Hicks became very emotional and began to cry on the stand. Following a break, Bove briefly continued his cross-examination before the court adjourned for the day.
You can read The National Pulse’s Day Six trial coverage here, and if you find our work worthwhile, consider joining up as a supporter.
show less
Hope Hicks, a former aide to and campaign press secretary for former President Donald J. Trump, took the stand on day seven of Trump's Manhattan-based 'hush money' trial. Former Biden Department of Justice attorney MatthewColangelo — who has a long history of engaging in partisan lawfare against conservatives — handled questioning for the prosecution.
show more
French President Emmanuel Macron has declared Russia “must never be able to win in Ukraine,” and that he will consider deploying forces to the Eastern European country if Russian troops make a significant breakthrough.
“I’m not ruling anything out, because we are facing someone who is not ruling anything out,” Macron said, referring to Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
“We have undoubtedly been too hesitant by defining the limits of our action to someone who no longer has any and who is the aggressor,” he argued, suggesting that “if the Russians were to break through the front lines, if there were a Ukrainian request,” he would consider sending troops into the country.
“We mustn’t rule anything out, because our objective is that Russia must never be able to win in Ukraine,” he added.
ESCALATION.
France is a NATO member, and Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has warned such an action by Macron would mean not “the probability” but “the inevitability” of conflict between the Western alliance and the Russian Federation.
French intervention in Ukraine might not immediately draw all NATO, as a conflict initiated by a NATO member does not necessarily trigger its mutual defense clause. Still, both Russia and France are nuclear powers, and direct conflict between the two states would be fraught with the risk of rapid escalation.
Macron reportedly told fellow politicians in France there are “no more limits” on the possible extent of French involvement in the Ukraine war in March. In February, he refused to rule out boots on the ground in Ukraine. Prime Minister Robert Fico of Slovakia, another NATO member, revealed “a number of NATO and [European Union] member states are considering that they will send their troops to Ukraine on a bilateral basis” the same month.
A Russian breakthrough in Ukraine appears increasingly likely. Russian forces are making significant gains along the eastern front, and enjoy a considerable artillery advantage on the battlefield.
show less
French President Emmanuel Macron has declared Russia "must never be able to win in Ukraine," and that he will consider deploying forces to the Eastern European country if Russian troops make a significant breakthrough.
show more
Donald Trump described migrant crime as a dangerous “new category of crime” in February. The National Pulse has been tracking major incidents involving illegal aliens charged or convicted of serious crimes ever since. A review of the last week shows that such criminality continues to endanger the American public and eat into public resources and that Biden may be trying to make it harder for the public to hold him accountable.
MOTHER AND CHILD.
Bodycam footage of the arrest of Angel Gabriel Cuz-Choc, a Guatemalan illegal alien who has confessed to the murder of a 36-year-old woman and her four-year-old daughter, has been released.
Cuz-Choc, who told investigators he paid a “coyote” smuggler to get him into the country, committed the double murder in the victims’ mobile home in Dover, Florida.
“The nature and circumstances of these offenses are excessively violent and brutal… he stabbed an innocent and defenseless four-year-old child while she was in the bathtub,” read documents related to Cuz-Choc’s case.
“Not only did he commit an unimaginable crime which cruelly claimed the lives of two innocent victims, he then made the cowardly and ultimately futile attempt to evade capture,” commented Sheriff Chad Chronister. The illegal was tracked and detained by K9 dogs while fleeing through woodland.
ANOTHER MOTHER AND CHILD.
Bylly Xilox Aquino, another Guatemalan illegal alien, was arrested for an attack on a mother and child, equally shocking but less deadly.
The 23-year-old is charged with raping and sodomizing an unnamed victim in Fairview, New Jersey, in the presence of a child and has been charged with sexual assault and two counts of child endangerment. The rape victim required medical treatment after the attack.
Aquino is subject to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainer request and is scheduled to appear in court on May 8.
KILLER IN CONNECTICUT.
Yet another Guatemalan illegal alien, an unnamed 35-year-old, was detained in Connecticut. He had previously been convicted of manslaughter but was let loose by state officials after serving only part of his sentence.
The killer entered the U.S. illegally in 2007 and was convicted and imprisoned for first-degree manslaughter in 2013. An immigration judge ordered his deportation in 2014. State officials released him instead of turning him over directly to ICE — a common theme in many of the cases recorded in The National Pulse’s migrant crime round-ups.
WANTED MAN.
ICE announced the detention of a Mexican wanted for homicide in his homeland on Wednesday. Juvenal Arroyo Hernandez, 48, had already been deported from the U.S. twice but slipped through its porous border for a third time.
He first crossed the border illegally in 1998, returning to Mexico voluntarily the same year after Border Patrol caught him. He next crossed the border in 2011 and was again detained by Border Patrol and removed after a few months.
It is not known when he crossed the border for the third time. Becoming a so-called “gotaway,” he was discovered by the authorities in Austin, Texas, in April and subsequently found to be wanted for homicide in Mexico.
PEDOPHILE WITH U.S. CITIZENSHIP.
Felix Aguilar-Matias, a now-former Mexican citizen, has been indicted for naturalization and passport fraud four years after his conviction for sexual battery and touching of a child for lustful purposes in Mississippi.
A U.S. passport-holder, Aguilar-Matias is accused of lying on his naturalization documents when asked whether he had “ever committed, assisted in committing, or attempted to commit, a crime or offense for which you were not arrested.”
The pedophile faces automatic loss of citizenship if he is convicted of naturalization fraud, but deporting him may prove difficult if he has renounced his Mexican citizenship.
He was netted as part of Operation False Haven, an expensive ICE operation examining fraudulently obtained naturalization and other benefits, which has gathered in migrants “convicted of serial rape, child sexual abuse, incest, sodomy, child sexual abuse material, kidnapping, sex trafficking, murder and narcotics trafficking.”
A COVER-UP UNDER BIDEN?
Many of the illegal aliens, including those in The National Pulse’s migrant crime round-ups, are identified only by their age and nationality because the authorities do not release their names.
This appears to be a matter of choice rather than legal necessity and has not gone unnoticed by the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI). The IRLI is suing ICE, noting that the agency named criminal aliens in 97 percent of its press releases during the Donald Trump administration.
“Recently, ICE began omitting the names of immigration violators it has arrested from agency press releases,” IRLI observed, noting that “[in the] 67 percent of cases where the alien was referred to by name, he/she had typically been named… by state or local law enforcement, or the media.”
ICE has not responded to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests asking it to hand over any internal policies and guidance on publicizing or not publicizing migrants’ names, and IRLI hopes to force them to do so through court action.
The current policy of seldom naming migrants causes transparency issues, as it makes it difficult or impossible for the press and public to examine the background of their cases.
"We have a new category of crime. It's called migrant crime, and it's going to be worse than any other form of crime," @realDonaldTrump told Laura Ingraham. pic.twitter.com/FrdQLSFKPB
Read The National Pulse’s previous migrant crime round-up here.
show less
Donald Trump described migrant crime as a dangerous “new category of crime” in February. The National Pulse has been tracking major incidents involving illegal aliens charged or convicted of serious crimes ever since. A review of the last week shows that such criminality continues to endanger the American public and eat into public resources and that Biden may be trying to make it harder for the public to hold him accountable.
show more
The Department of Justice announced a criminal indictment against Representative Henry Cuellar (D-TX) and his wife, Imelda, on Friday. The charges are related to foreigncorruption. In January 2022, federal agents raided Cuellar’s home and campaign office in Texas as part of an investigation into a group of U.S. businessmen with ties to Azerbaijan. At the time, the Texas Democrat pledged to cooperate with the federal investigation.
Cueller and his wife are accused of accepting $600,000 in bribes as part of an Azerbaijani foreign influence operation. The indictment alleges the Texas Democrat agreed to “influence legislative activity” and lobby the Biden government on behalf of Azerbaijan in exchange for the bribes. This marks the second Congressional Democrat to be indicted on accusations of foreign corruption in the last year.
In September 2023, a federal grand jury indicted Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) on charges of corruption and acting as an unregistered foreign agent for Egypt and Qatar. According to the indictment, Menendez and his wife Nadine received payments in cash, gold bars, and a luxury vehicle for their efforts on behalf of the two foreign governments. Despite the indictment, Menendez continues to serve in the U.S. Senate and maintains access to classified intelligence briefings.
Rep. Cuellar has occasionally broken ranks with his fellow Democrats in Congress and has, at times, criticized Biden‘s open border policies. First elected to the House in 2004, Cuellar is a long-standing member of the centrist Blue Dog Democrats. In March, he launched a new caucus for Congressional Democrats focusing on border security.
The Texas Democrat is also the only remaining pro-life Democrat in Congress.
JUST IN: Prosecutors have charged Rep. Cuellar and his wife with accepting $600,000 in foreign bribes and money laundering.
The Department of Justice announced a criminal indictment against Representative Henry Cuellar (D-TX) and his wife, Imelda, on Friday. The charges are related to foreign corruption. In January 2022, federal agents raided Cuellar's home and campaign office in Texas as part of an investigation into a group of U.S. businessmen with ties to Azerbaijan. At the time, the Texas Democrat pledged to cooperate with the federal investigation.
show more
Joe Biden has flown almost 100,000 migrants to Miami under a controversial parole program because he hopes to strengthen his party’s support in electoral strongholds such as Miami-Dade, according to the city mayor. The Democrat won the county with only 53.31 percent of the vote in 2020, down from Hillary Clinton’s 63.22 percent in 2016.
Mayor Francis Suarez said Biden’s flights are a “pandering attempt” to win support “no different from giving free college education to students to try to buy the young vote.” He said Trump, in contrast, won support by taking on “the socialist and communist governments that are destroying the countries that a lot of these people are fleeing.”
It was known that the Joe Biden regime was flying hundreds of thousands of migrants directly to the U.S. in early March, but he refused to reveal where. In recent days, the House Homeland Security Committee has been able to discover that Florida accounts for four of the flights’ top ten destinations, with Miami topping the chart with 91,821 arrivals over an eight-month period.
“This is quite possibly the biggest failure of the Biden administration, beginning with the fact that I don’t think they ever anticipated that immigration and the border and their lack of control of the border would be such a big issue in the presidential race,” said Suarez, who is of Cuban heritage.
“There have been over seven million illegal entries into the United States since he took office, which is more than the population of 37 states,” he added. In fact, the illegal alien influx under Biden is already 9.4 million, not including “gotaways.” Illegal immigration under Biden will likely equal total legal immigration to the U.S. from 1892 to 1954 by the end of his term.
Linked to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF), Suarez made the comments despite having refused to vote for Trump in 2020 and opposing him in the Republican primary race.
His views on Biden using immigration as an electoral weapon are increasingly common among the public. Fifty-four percent of likely voters believe the Democrat is “encouraging” illegal immigration to “create a permanent majority” for the Democrats. Among Hispanic voters, the share of voters who think this is even higher, at 68 percent.
show less
Joe Biden has flown almost 100,000 migrants to Miami under a controversial parole program because he hopes to strengthen his party's support in electoral strongholds such as Miami-Dade, according to the city mayor. The Democrat won the county with only 53.31 percent of the vote in 2020, down from Hillary Clinton's 63.22 percent in 2016.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
