Tuesday, July 28, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

MS-13 HOAX ALERT: Media, Democrats Spin Gang Member Deportation Into ‘Maryland Father of 3’ Sob Story.

PULSE POINTS: 

❓What Happened: Vice President J.D. Vance is slamming corporate media outlets—including The Atlantic and POLITICO—for misrepresenting the immigration case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an El Salvadoran national and MS-13 gang member deported from the U.S.

📍Where & When: The case dates back to a 2019 immigration ruling under the Trump administration. The media coverage and political backlash surfaced in March–April 2025.

🧑‍⚖️Who’s Involved:
Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Determined by a federal immigration judge to be a member of MS-13 and a danger to the community.
J.D. Vance: Vice President, refuting media claims and citing court documents.
Jon Favreau: Former Obama speechwriter, accused Trump team of sending an “innocent father” to a “torture dungeon.”
Kyle Cheney: POLITICO reporter claiming Garcia had not been convicted.

📄Key Facts:
– In 2019, a judge denied bond and ruled Garcia a flight risk and community danger.
– Immigration court found sufficient evidence he was a member of MS-13.
– Deportation order was issued—but not to El Salvador due to withholding protections.
– Media reports ignored or downplayed gang affiliation, painting Garcia as a sympathetic figure.

💬Key Quote:
“My comment is that according to the court document you apparently didn’t read he was a convicted MS-13 gang member with no legal right to be here.” – Vice President J.D. Vance

⚠️Fallout:
– Vance accused the media of running a “propaganda operation” to vilify Trump-era immigration enforcement. POLITICO’s Kyle Cheney and The Atlantic have been criticized for selectively citing legal documents and downplaying criminal affiliations.

THE FULL STORY:

The corporate media is being called out by Vice President J.D. Vance for failing to accurately report the facts of an immigration case where Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an El Salvadoran national and alleged member of the violent MS-13 criminal gang, was deported to his home country. While federal attorneys have acknowledged a U.S. immigration judge had issued an order preventing Abrego Garcia’s removal to El Salvador, the corporate media—especially The Atlantic and POLITICO—have attempted to brush the more troubling facts regarding the MS-13 gang member under the rug, instead portraying Abrego Garcia as an innocent father of three.

According to The Atlantic–the same magazine that recently peddled the Signal ‘war plans’ hoax–the Trump administration detained and deported “a Maryland father with protected legal status” to El Salvador—obfuscating Abrego Garcia’s court-determined affiliation with MS-13.

Meanwhile, former Obama White House speechwriter Jon Favreau attempted to make political hay of The Atlantic article with a post on X (formerly Twitter) directed at Vice President Vance, Elon Musk, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, stating: “You just admitted to accidentally sending an innocent father from Maryland to a torture dungeon in El Salvador. And you refuse to do anything about it.”

‘A CONVICTED MS-13 GANG MEMBER.’

The post by Favreau prompted Vice President Vance to respond and set the record straight regarding Abrego Garcia’s criminal history.

“My comment is that according to the court document you apparently didn’t read he was a convicted MS-13 gang member with no legal right to be here,” Vance wrote, adding: “My further comment is that it’s gross to get fired up about gang members getting deported while ignoring citizens they victimize.”

In an attempt to pile on, POLITICO legal reporter Kyle Cheney further added to the corporate media obfuscation with the journalist claiming that Abrego Garcia had not been “convicted” of being a gang member. Cheney, instead, states that the El Salvadoran national was merely “denied bond in 2019 over an informant’s claim he was in MS-13. ”

THE 2019 IMMIGRATION CASE.

However, Cheney appears to have only read the current legal filing by Robert L. Cerna, acting field office director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), where ICE acknowledged the protective order barring Abrego Garcia from being removed to El Salvador. A review of Abrego Garcia’s 2019 case before a federal immigration judge reveals—as noted by Vice President Vance—that the court found sufficient evidence to determine that the El Salvadoran national was, in fact, a member of MS-13. The court’s determination is the equivalent of a conviction.

Further, the immigration judge did order his removal from the United States but also issued a grant of withholding—preventing the illegal immigrant from being sent back to El Salvador specifically, as the court found doing so posed a credible threat to his life.

Also of note in the 2019 case—and where Cheney appears to have stopped reading—is the fact that Abrego Garcia was denied bond during the hearing process as the immigration judge found he posed a danger to the community and was a flight risk. Additionally, after Abrego Garcia appealed the bond ruling, the Board of Immigration Appeals upheld the court’s determination—agreeing that the El Salvadoran illegal immigrant posed a threat to the community.

‘MEDIA PROPAGANDA OPERATION.’

The Abrego Garcia is a fairly straightforward example of how the corporate media is desperate to frame the illegal immigration and deportation narrative as one where President Donald J. Trump is removing innocent fathers and mothers and sending them to an El Salvadoran gulag.

However, even in their most touted example of such an alleged instance, the actual facts tell a very different story. Abrego Garcia was determined by an immigration court to be a member of the violent MS-13 gang. Further, the court determined that Abrego Garcia was a danger to the community. That same court ordered Abrego Garcia’s removal from the United States, only barring him from being sent to El Salvador.

As Vice President Vance stated on X: “It is telling that the entire American media is going to run a propaganda operation today making you think an innocent “father of 3″ was apprehended by a gulag.”

READ:

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Grooming Gang Victims Urge UK PM Burnham to Reverse Plan to Release Predators Early.

Survivors of grooming gang abuse are calling on British Prime Minister Andy Burnham to take decisive action to prevent dangerous offenders from being released early under planned prison reforms.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Two survivors of grooming gang abuse, Sarah Wilson and Jade Belgrove, have urged British Prime Minister Andy Burnham to permanently exclude serious sexual and violent offenders from the Labour government’s planned early prisoner release scheme, warning that releasing such offenders will put the public at risk and discourage future victims from coming forward. The women sent a letter to Burnham calling for urgent action, arguing that survivors cannot safely live in communities where dangerous offenders may be released early.
📺 DETAIL: Wilson said the government’s decision to pause the planned policy only provides a limited time to secure exemptions for high-risk offenders. Representing the survivors, solicitor Amy Clowrey said the proposed policy has caused significant anxiety among victims and described the pause as another setback for survivors‘ rights, urging the government to ensure those convicted of serious sexual and violent crimes are not eligible for early release. Clowrey said many survivors feel they have once again been sidelined. Wilson said she would personally urge Burnham to revoke the policy for dangerous offenders if given the opportunity, while Belgrove appealed to the Prime Minister to “do the right thing” for survivors and future victims. Burnham previously confirmed the unpopular changes, planned for Septembe, have been paused while the government conducts an urgent review.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “We can’t risk having these people back into the community. We all know how much of a danger they are through our own experiences and to future victims.” – Jade Belgrove
🎯 IMPACT: The Burnham government’s response to this issue could set a precedent for how serious offenders are handled in the future, particularly in cases of sexual and violent crimes.

Image by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Survivors of grooming gang abuse are calling on British Prime Minister Andy Burnham to take decisive action to prevent dangerous offenders from being released early under planned prison reforms.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Millionaires in High-Tax Britain Drop to Lowest Levels Since 2008.

The number of British millionaires has plummeted to its lowest level since the 2008 financial crisis, raising concerns about the country’s economic environment for wealth creators.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The number of millionaires in the United Kingdom has fallen below 450,000, the lowest since the 2008 financial crash.
📰 DETAIL: According to the Adam Smith Institute (ASI), the number of millionaires in Britain fell to 442,000 in 2025. This constitutes a seven percent decrease from the previous year. In 2021, the number of millionaires in Britain peaked at 1.07 million. The Adam Smith Institute’s ‘millionaire tracker’ measures the number of people in Britain with a net worth of £1 million (~$1,329,580) or more in assets (cash, investments, property, pensions). “The decline in millionaires may be greeted as a success by some on the Left, but it should instead be viewed as a warning signal.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “There has [also] been a well-documented trend of high net-worth individuals either leaving Britain or no longer choosing to move here… Millionaires are leaving the country for a number of reasons, including the abolition of non-dom tax status, high levels of general taxation, and a hostile culture for wealth creators… Every millionaire that leaves means less capital for British businesses, fewer international connections, and weaker entrepreneurial spirit in the economy.” – Mitchell Palmer, economist at the Adam Smith Institute.
🎯 IMPACT: The decline in millionaires is likely to shrink the British tax base, leading to rising taxes for people on more modest incomes. However, given the leftward shift of the British government under the new Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, tax rises to squeeze remaining residents are more likely than tax cuts to make the country less unattractive to successful people. Earlier this month, it was reported that Prime Minister Burnham was planning a tax raid worth $51 billion. The decline in millionaires underscores the shared perception that Britain is increasingly hostile to wealth creation.

Image by Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The number of British millionaires has plummeted to its lowest level since the 2008 financial crisis, raising concerns about the country's economic environment for wealth creators.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

RFK Jr. Accuses Fauci of Concealing Personal COVID Vaccine Injury.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says Dr. Anthony Fauci privately dealt with a vaccine-related health issue while promoting the COVID-19 vaccine to the public.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has alleged that Dr. Anthony Fauci suffered a pulmonary infarction, a potential adverse event linked to the COVID-19 vaccine, five months after receiving the shot in January 2021. Kennedy said in a Monday interview that Fauci, who was Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Chief Medical Advisor to former President Joe Biden from 2021, kept this health issue secret while publicly promoting the vaccine and dismissing such risks.
📺 DETAIL: According to Kennedy, Fauci received treatment for the condition from top medical professionals but did not disclose the incident to the public. Kennedy has also accused Fauci of leading the U.S. to a disproportionately high COVID-19 mortality rate compared to countries with fewer lockdown-style restrictions and less stringent vaccine programs. “We had in our country, because of Dr. Fauci’s leadership… the highest mortality rate from COVID of any country in the world… We had a death rate in our country of 3,000 per million population. All the countries in Africa averaged about 350 deaths [per million]. So one-tenth of what we had in this country,” he stated.
💬 KEY QUOTE:He got vaccinated… in January of [2021]. And then, five months later, he had… a pulmonary infarction, which is one of the adverse events that NIH, CDC, and FDA said are expected from the vaccine.” – Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
🎯 IMPACT: Kennedy’s comments will raise further questions about the honesty, transparency, and accountability of public health officials during the pandemic.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says Dr. Anthony Fauci privately dealt with a vaccine-related health issue while promoting the COVID-19 vaccine to the public.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

UK Govt Lets Islamic Organization Linked to Iranian Regime Sponsor Visas.

The Islamic Center of England, a London-based charity with alleged connections to the Iranian regime, has come under increased scrutiny after being allowed to remain on the British government’s list of licensed sponsors for migrant workers.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The United Kingdom has allowed a charity with alleged links to the Iranian regime to remain on the government’s list of licensed visa sponsors.
📺 DETAIL: The Islamic Centre of England, a London-based charity, is allowed to import migrants by sponsoring visas for “Skilled Workers,” including religious ministers. This is despite the charity being under investigation by the Charity Commission, the United Kingdom’s independent regulator overseeing charitable activities and organizations, for alleged links to the Iranian regime, and regarded by critics as a threat to national security. The Centre has hosted events with merchandise featuring symbols associated with Iran and Hezbollah. The Centre also held a candlelit vigil for Qassim Soleimani, former commander of Iran’s terrorist Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), after he was killed in an airstrike conducted by the United States back in 2020. Seyed Hashem Moosavi, the Centre’s imam and director, has described protesters opposed to the Iranian regime as “soldiers of Satan.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “It is alarming that the Islamic Centre of England remains a registered visa sponsor while subject to an ongoing inquiry.” – Lord Walney, former government adviser on political violence
🎯 IMPACT: The charity’s ability to sponsor visas while under investigation raises questions about the British government’s oversight of such organizations. The story has sparked concerns that the government is not taking the threats posed by groups with potential ties to hostile foreign regimes seriously. Public pressure could lead to the Centre’s removal from the list of licensed sponsors. This is another example of how the government’s “Skilled Worker” visa, roughly equivalent to the H-1B visa in the United States, is vulnerable to exploitation, with the definition of “skilled” extending far beyond medicine, engineering, and tech, which are the fields most members of the public believe the visa is intended for. This week, it was revealed that Islamic bookshops in Britain selling pro-jihad material were also granted the ability to sponsor “Skilled Workers” from overseas.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

The Islamic Center of England, a London-based charity with alleged connections to the Iranian regime, has come under increased scrutiny after being allowed to remain on the British government's list of licensed sponsors for migrant workers.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Birth Rates Are Falling in American Cities, With California the Worst Affected.

A new report has revealed a significant decline in child populations across major cities in the United States, with cities in California experiencing some of the steepest losses.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The number of children living in major cities in the United States has fallen by six percent, with Californian cities experiencing the steepest declines.
📺 DETAIL: According to data published by The Wall Street Journal, the number of children living in major U.S. cities has dropped six percent over the past decade. Out of the 25 cities with the largest child population declines, six of them are in California. San Jose has lost 20 percent of its population under 18 and 34 percent of children under five years old. San Diego has lost 14 percent of its children, Fresno lost five percent, Sacramento lost four percent, and San Francisco has lost three percent. The study includes cities with a population of more than 500,000 residents. The U.S. birth rate has fallen nine percent over the past ten years. A rising cost of living in urban areas is driving people to leave major cities to start families, a trend accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, according to analysts. However, some cities have experienced an uptick. The child population in Fort Worth, Texas, and Jacksonville, Florida, has increased by 11 percent over the last decade, while the child population in Washington, D.C., and Seattle, Washington, has increased by 10 percent.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Families had more exit options and they took them,” said Connor O’Brien, Fellow at the Institute for Progress, a non-partisan think-tank based in Washington, D.C.
🎯 IMPACT: The decline in child populations could have long-term implications for urban development, schools, and local economies. This represents a continuing trend of declining fertility across the United States. In 2024, it was reported that the U.S. birth and fertility rates were declining significantly. According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the number of births in the U.S. decreased by two percent in 2023. The general fertility rate experienced a three percent drop over the same period. This reflects a broader trend across the West. Earlier this year, it was reported that England and Wales had recorded their lowest fertility rates on record in 2025.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new report has revealed a significant decline in child populations across major cities in the United States, with cities in California experiencing some of the steepest losses.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Americans Cut Back on Salad Amid Diarrhea Parasite Outbreak.

A recent survey reveals that the cyclospora outbreak is leading many Americans to cut back on produce consumption, with confidence in the FDA’s response remaining mixed.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A CBS News/YouGov poll found that most Americans are following news about the cyclospora outbreak at least somewhat closely, with nearly as many paying attention to the parasite as to the conflict with Iran. About four in 10 respondents said they are buying or eating less produce because of the outbreak. Women were slightly more likely than men to report cutting back on produce, and older adults were more likely than younger adults to do so.
📺 DETAIL: Those following news of the outbreak most closely were especially likely to have changed their eating habits. Public confidence in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration‘s ability to respond to the outbreak was divided, with more Americans expressing confidence than a lack of confidence, though relatively few said they had a great deal of trust in the agency. The survey also found a partisan divide, with Republicans more likely than Democrats to express confidence in the FDA‘s handling of the outbreak. The CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted July 22–24, 2026, among a nationally representative sample of 2,193 U.S. adults.
📈 DATA: The survey’s margin of error is ±2.7 points, and the sample was weighted to reflect U.S. Census data on gender, age, race, education, and 2024 presidential vote patterns.
🎯 IMPACT: The outbreak is influencing Americans’ dietary habits, potentially affecting the produce industry.

Image by Forest and Kim Starr.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A recent survey reveals that the cyclospora outbreak is leading many Americans to cut back on produce consumption, with confidence in the FDA's response remaining mixed.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Cracker Barrel CEO Out After Woke Rebrand Fiasco.

Cracker Barrel’s CEO Julie Masino has resigned following a disastrous rebrand attempt, with its new leader pledging to uphold the company’s traditional appeal.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Cracker Barrel announced Monday that CEO Julie Masino will step down after three years leading the restaurant chain, following a turbulent tenure marked by backlash over a woke rebrand. Masino faced widespread criticism after introducing a minimalist logo and removing the chain’s signature antique aesthetic, prompting a social media backlash that contributed to a 15 percent drop in the company’s stock price and led her to pause the renovation plan.
📺 DETAIL: President Donald J. Trump was among those who publicly criticized the logo change and urged the company to restore its traditional branding. After Cracker Barrel reinstated its iconic Uncle Hershel logo, Trump congratulated the company and encouraged it to focus on satisfying its customers. David Deno, the former CEO of Bloomin’ Brands, will succeed Masino on August 10, with the company saying he is well-positioned to build on Cracker Barrel’s legacy and strengthen its financial performance. Masino will remain in an advisory role through October 9, 2026, supposedly to help ensure a smooth leadership transition. Deno has said he intends to preserve the chain’s traditional values, highlighting its longstanding connection with customers.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Congratulations Cracker Barrel on changing your logo back to what it was. All of your fans very much appreciate it.” – President Donald J. Trump
🎯 IMPACT: The leadership change signals a potential return to Cracker Barrel’s traditional values, with incoming CEO David Deno having emphasized maintaining the company’s “warm country hospitality” and “timeless appeal.”

Image by Leo Reynolds.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Cracker Barrel's CEO Julie Masino has resigned following a disastrous rebrand attempt, with its new leader pledging to uphold the company's traditional appeal.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Fauci Diary Suggests He Misled Congress on COVID Fatalities.

Newly released journal entries from Dr. Anthony Fauci reveal discrepancies between his private assessments and public testimony on COVID-19’s fatality rate.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rand Paul (R-KY) has released previously private journal entries written by former White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci ahead of his expected testimony before a congressional oversight committee, with the records showing Fauci privately comparing the emerging coronavirus in February 2020 to a “bad influenza” and estimating a case fatality rate of about 0.2 to 0.3 percent.
📺 DETAIL:  In the February 8, 2020, entry, Fauci recounted a conversation with former CDC director Tom Frieden in which the two agreed that the virus appeared less deadly than early official figures suggested. About a month later, however, Fauci told Congress that available data indicated COVID-19 had an overall mortality rate of about three percent, which he said could fall to around one percent after accounting for asymptomatic and mild infections, making it roughly 10 times more lethal than seasonal influenza. During the March 11 hearing, Fauci stressed that COVID-19 should be treated as a serious public health threat and said the 2009 H1N1 pandemic had been less lethal than the seasonal flu. Representative Michael Cloud (R-TX) questioned Fauci about how Americans should assess the virus’s severity, prompting Fauci to reiterate that the higher estimated mortality rate justified aggressive prevention efforts. The released journals have prompted renewed scrutiny over whether Fauci’s private assessments differed from his public testimony during the early months of the pandemic. Additional diary entries also describe Fauci’s growing media profile, including comments in April and May 2020 about the volume of press coverage and his increasing national and international recognition.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This has a mortality of ten times that [of the flu], and that’s the reason why I want to emphasize we have to stay ahead of the game in preventing this.” – Dr. Anthony Fauci, March 2020 testimony to Congress

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

Newly released journal entries from Dr. Anthony Fauci reveal discrepancies between his private assessments and public testimony on COVID-19's fatality rate.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Another Poll Reveals Overwhelming Public Support for the SAVE America Act.

A new survey has revealed overwhelming bipartisan support for President Donald J. Trump’s SAVE America Act, which seeks to strengthen election security by implementing voter ID and proof of citizenship requirements.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A new poll has revealed that the vast majority of Americans support President Donald J. Trump’s SAVE America Act.
📺 DETAIL: According to a poll commissioned by Tea Party Patriots Action and conducted by McLaughlin & Associates, a large majority of American voters support the SAVE America Act, which mandates voter ID and proof of citizenship to participate in federal elections. Specifically, the SAVE Act is backed by 94 percent of Republicans, 73 percent of independents, and 68 percent of Democrats. The poll also found that 82 percent of respondents agree that only U.S. citizens should vote in federal elections and 66 percent disagree with the idea that voter ID laws are unfair. Only 29 percent regard them as unfair. Furthermore, 55.5 percent of voters said Congress should continue to work towards passing the SAVE Act before the midterm elections, compared with just 34.1 percent who said the SAVE Act should be dropped. The poll was conducted on July 22 and surveyed 1,000 general election voters across the U.S. “This landmark bill requires that all voters must show photo voter ID… How simple is that? ‘Could I have your photo, please?’ Photo voter ID. All voters must provide proof of citizenship,” President Trump said of the Act last week at the White House.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Our poll shows that an overwhelming majority of American votersincluding a strong majority of Democrats—support proof of U.S. citizenship in order to register to vote and showing voter ID when casting a ballot.” – Jenny Beth Martin, Tea Party Patriots Action
🎯 IMPACT: The survey underscores broad public backing for election integrity measures. These findings make congressional Democrat obstruction of the SAVE America Act in Congress even less tenable, considering that a clear majority of the party’s supporters back election integrity measures, including voter ID. This is likely to reinforce the President’s argument that congressional Democrats only oppose the Act because it would hurt their chances of getting elected via fraud.
📺 FLASHBACK: The poll reflects similar findings reported by various polling firms back in March. A Harvard CAPS/Harris poll revealed that 81 percent of Americans back voter ID, including 79 percent of independents and 70 percent of Democrats. Similarly, Pew Research Center found that 83 percent of Americans support voter ID, including a majority of Democrats and independents, as well as a majority of white voters, black voters, and Latino voters. According to Gallup, 84 percent support voter ID, including 98 percent of Republicans, 84 percent of independents, and 67 percent of Democrats. The poll also revealed that 83 percent of Americans support proof of citizenship to vote. Furthermore, Rasmussen revealed that 75 percent support voter ID, with support for such measures increasing over the past ten years.

Image by Joe Mabel.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A new survey has revealed overwhelming bipartisan support for President Donald J. Trump's SAVE America Act, which seeks to strengthen election security by implementing voter ID and proof of citizenship requirements.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Iran Accuses Ukraine of Striking Ship, Vows to Retaliate.

A Ukrainian strike on an Iranian vessel in the Caspian Sea has prompted Tehran to threaten retaliation, raising concerns that the Iran war and the Ukraine war could merge.

PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Concerns are growing that the wars in Ukraine and Iran could merge after Ukraine struck an Iranian vessel in the Caspian Sea. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said it was transporting Russian military cargo.
📺 DETAIL: Iran condemned the attack, claiming the ship was a commercial vessel, saying one sailor was killed and another injured. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned the strike “cannot go unanswered” while accusing Kiev of violating international law and acting on Israel’s behalf. Tehran also summoned Ukraine’s chargé d’affaires and urged European countries to hold Ukraine accountable. Zelensky separately alleged that Russia has been providing Iran with satellite intelligence on Gulf states and U.S. military bases, claiming the information has been used to support Iranian strikes. Kiev has also long accused Tehran of supplying Russia with Shahed drones, despite Iranian denials.
🎯 IMPACT: The strike has fueled speculation of a growing overlap between the Ukraine war and tensions in the Middle East, with analysts warning of a potential merging of conflicts. Iran’s response could include targeting Ukrainian-linked vessels or formally recognizing Crimea and Donbas as Russian territories.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Zelensky has attacked an Iranian commercial vessel, killing a sailor. A blatant UN Charter violation done at Israel’s behest to drag Europe into its war.” – Abbas Araghchi, Iranian Foreign Minister
📺 FLASHBACK: Iran has previously denied involvement in Russia’s war in Ukraine, despite strong evidence that it has been supplying drones to Moscow. Meanwhile, Kiev has been expanding its long-range strike capabilities, targeting Russian infrastructure and now potentially Russia-linked Iranian assets, signaling a shift in its military strategy.
📈 DATA: The Caspian Sea, where the strike occurred, is over 600 miles from the front lines of the Russia-Ukraine war, underlining Kiev’s growing drone capabilities, which have already caused significant damage to Russian oil infrastructure.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less

A Ukrainian strike on an Iranian vessel in the Caspian Sea has prompted Tehran to threaten retaliation, raising concerns that the Iran war and the Ukraine war could merge.

show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.