An Obama-era appointee judge for Washington DC has this evening issued a restraining order and demanding that violent Tren de Aragua members subject to President Trump’s deportation plan be returned to the United States.
The order marks a small victory for those defending deportees, including the leftist American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
OK – now rare Saturday hearing in J.G.G. v. TRUMP in which DDC Chief Judge Boasberg has already issued a temporary restraining order against deporting Tren de Aragua members to Venezuela under the Alien Enemies Act. Inner City Press will live tweet, thread below https://t.co/TxdskoXaiH
“These folks would be deported, they face persecution or worse in Venezuela. I haven’t heard any harm from the US beyond the infringement on the President’s power. I aim to prevent the removal of all non citizens detained subject to the AEA,” said Boasberg on Saturday night during the hearing.
The news comes shortly after the President made it clear he was going to use the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to rid America of violent gang members who are in the country illegally.
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump dismissed rumors that he is considering replacing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Secretary Noem, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, and White House Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Wednesday, during a roundtable with business leaders.
💬KEY QUOTE: “I read a story recently that I’m unhappy with Kristi—I’m so happy with her… She’s fantastic, actually,” said President Trump.
🎯IMPACT: The White House firmly denied the report, calling it “total Fake News” and praising Noem’s performance.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump threw cold water on corporate media speculation that he is looking to replace Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, calling her performance “fantastic” during a roundtable with business leaders late on Wednesday. “I read a story recently that I’m unhappy with Kristi—I’m so happy with her… We have a border that’s the best border in the history of our country. Why would I be unhappy? She’s fantastic, actually,” Trump told reporters.
The pushback comes following a report from MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), which claimed that Noem was on “very thin ice” and that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller was leading an effort to replace her. The report alleged dissatisfaction with Noem’s pace in building new detention centers and handling of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and disaster relief funds. However, the Trump White House dismissed the claims as “total Fake News.”
White House Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson said of the report, “Everything about this is total Fake News. Secretary Noem is doing a great job implementing the President’s agenda and making America safe again. MS Now continues to beclown themselves by inventing narratives that simply are not true.”
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin also criticized the report, saying, “I can’t speak for the President, but I’ve seen more credible reporting on Bigfoot.”
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Jobless claims in the U.S. increased by 44,000 to 236,000 for the week ending December 6, surpassing analyst predictions of 213,000. However, continuing claims have reached their lowest level since mid-April.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. Labor Department reported the data, which reflects national trends in employment and layoffs.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The data covers the week ending December 6.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Applications for unemployment aid are viewed as a proxy for layoffs and are close to a real-time indicator of the health of the job market.” – Labor Department report
🎯IMPACT: The rise in claims contrasts with a drop in continuing claims, which fell by 99,000 to 1.84 million, suggesting a mixed picture for the labor market.
IN FULL
U.S. jobless claims jumped by 44,000 to 236,000 in the week ending December 6, according to the Labor Department—well above economists’ forecasts of 213,000 and a sharp increase from the prior week’s 192,000. However, the number of people receiving ongoing unemployment benefits dropped 99,000 to 1.84 million for the week ending November 29—the lowest level since mid-April.
The four-week moving average of new claims, which accounts for short-term volatility, edged up 2,000 to 216,750. Unemployment claims are widely regarded as a timely indicator of layoffs and overall labor market conditions. The latest figures paint a mixed picture: some industries appear to be cutting jobs, while others are retaining workers or rehiring them.
The data underscore the ongoing fluctuations in the U.S. job market, highlighting the need for policymakers to monitor employment indicators in the weeks ahead closely. On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates for a third time, tacitly acknowledging the Trump administration’s longstanding position that excessive borrowing costs for businesses and consumers have held down hiring.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: An LGBTQ+ flag that flew at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in England was taken down during the team’s Champions League match against rival soccer club Slavia Prague. The flag’s removal came at the request of the Czech team.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tottenham, Slavia Prague, and soccer fans.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Earlier this week in England.
💬KEY QUOTE: “As a Tottenham supporter was nice to see our stadium without the rainbow flags.” — Tottenham fan on Instagram
🎯IMPACT: While only temporary, the move was largely celebrated by fans.
IN FULL
An LGBTQ+ flag that flew at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium was taken down during the team’s Champions League match against rival soccer club Slavia Prague. The flag’s removal on “security” grounds came at the request of the Czech team, which was concerned that supporters could “damage the flag and cause disorder.”
On social media, fans of Tottenham celebrated the temporary reprieve, with one user writing, “As a Tottenham supporter was nice to see our stadium without the rainbow flags.” Another declared, “Game has never been more back.”
However, some liberal supporters complained, with one user on Instagram writing, “Bowing to a bunch of foreign guests who leave again after the game? [F]or the weak honestly. You stand for something you stand for something, whatever it is.”
Overall, the response to Tottenham’s removal of the LGBTQ+ flag appears positive. Most fans have expressed a desire to merely enjoy the game without politics being injected into it. “Good, keep political statements out of football,” one Instagram user wrote, while another said, “Why these are even allowed in football is beyond me, it’s a political cult flag.”
Notably, the escape from gender and sexual politics for these fans will be brief, with the flags likely to return after the Slavia Prague match.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) accused Representative Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) of joining a violent mob during a bust of a transnational criminal ring and lying about being pepper-sprayed.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Representative Adelita Grijalva, ICE agents, and over 100 leftist agitators.
📍WHEN & WHERE: December 2025, in Tucson, Arizona, and surrounding areas.
💬KEY QUOTE: “These enforcement actions have unequivocally disrupted this criminal organization’s ability to exploit our lawful labor and system of commerce.” – Acting Special Agent in Charge Ray Rede
🎯IMPACT: The operation led to the arrest of 46 individuals and highlighted tensions between activists and law enforcement.
IN FULL
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has accused Representative Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) of taking part in a violent protest against federal agents during a large-scale enforcement action in Tucson, Arizona, that targeted a transnational criminal group and led to 46 arrests, among them a convicted sex offender.
The operation, carried out by the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Arizona unit with support from multiple federal, state, and local agencies, was intended to break up a network engaged in human smuggling, labor trafficking, and related offenses. More than 100 demonstrators reportedly interfered with the raid, assaulting officers and vandalizing property.
According to ICE, Rep. Grijalva joined the demonstrators and wrongly claimed that law enforcement had pepper-sprayed her. In recorded footage, she referred to the targeted restaurant as a community favorite and condemned ICE as a “lawless agency.”
Tensions rose further when protesters chained a gate shut in an attempt to confine agents inside the restaurant’s perimeter, prompting the deployment of an HSI Special Response Team. The operation nonetheless succeeded in disrupting the criminal network.
Acting Special Agent in Charge Ray Rede said, “These enforcement actions have unequivocally disrupted this criminal organization’s ability to exploit our lawful labor and system of commerce,” and affirmed that similar operations will continue.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Lance Corporal George Hooley, a British paratrooper, died in Ukraine while assisting Ukrainian forces.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Lance Corporal George Hooley of the Parachute Regiment and Ukrainian forces.
📍WHEN & WHERE: December 2025, in Ukraine, away from the front lines.
💬KEY QUOTE: “He served our country with honour and distinction around the world in the cause of freedom and democracy, including as part of the small number of British personnel in Ukraine.” – Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer
🎯IMPACT: The death of the elite paratrooper underlines the fact that Britain, a NATO power, has military personnel on the ground in Ukraine, actively aiding Ukrainian forces against Russia.
IN FULL
A British soldier who died while deployed in Ukraine has been formally identified as Lance Corporal George Hooley, 28, of the Parachute Regiment. The British Ministry of Defence (MoD) said he was killed in a “tragic accident” on Tuesday morning while watching Ukrainian troops test a new defensive system.
During Prime Minister’s Question Time in the House of Commons, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer paid tribute to him, saying: “Lance Corporal Hooley was injured in a tragic accident away from the front lines while observing Ukrainian forces testing a new defensive capability. His life was full of courage and determination. He served our country with honour and distinction around the world in the cause of freedom and democracy, including as part of the small number of British personnel in Ukraine.”
The MoD later issued its own statement confirming his identity and offering condolences: “It is with sadness that we must confirm that the member of the UK Armed Forces who died in Ukraine on Tuesday 9th December is Lance Corporal George Hooley of the Parachute Regiment. He was 28 years old. Our thoughts are with Lance Corporal Hooley’s family and friends at this incredibly difficult time.”
The Parachute Regiment, based mainly at Merville Barracks in Colchester, is one of the British Army’s elite airborne units. The government has previously acknowledged that a “small number” of British personnel are present in Ukraine, supposedly in roles supporting diplomatic security and assisting Ukrainian forces in certain training missions. The Kremlin has long claimed that British troops are actively assisting Ukrainian offensive operations.
Thousands of volunteers from the United States, Europe, and elsewhere have joined Ukrainian formations, such as the International Legion, in a more informal capacity. Several reports have highlighted allegations by foreign volunteers that non-Ukrainian fighters were discouraged or prevented from leaving Ukraine after signing on, and that casualty rates among foreign recruits have been high.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating deaths potentially linked to COVID-19 vaccines.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The FDA, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) spokesman Andrew Nixon, and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Investigation ongoing in the United States.
💬KEY QUOTE: “FDA is doing a thorough investigation, across multiple age groups, of deaths potentially related to COVID vaccines.” – Andrew Nixon
🎯IMPACT: The investigation raises further concerns about vaccine safety and transparency in FDA processes.
IN FULL
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) says the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating reports of deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccinations. HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon said the agency “is doing a thorough investigation, across multiple age groups, of deaths potentially related to COVID vaccines.”
The inquiry initially centered on possible fatalities among children, a review launched in September by Commissioner Marty Makary. That effort expanded after a leaked memo from a senior FDA official claimed the vaccines had been associated with “at least 10 infant deaths,” although the document reportedly did not include evidence to substantiate the allegation. The investigation has since broadened to examine reports involving other age groups as well.
Most COVID vaccine side effects are relatively mild and temporary, such as fatigue, fever, or arm soreness. However, serious reactions—including myocarditis, pericarditis, or severe allergic responses—have also been observed.
In 2025, the FDA required manufacturers of the mRNA vaccines used in the United States to update their product labeling with refined risk estimates for myocarditis and pericarditis. The updated data indicated that these conditions occur in only a small number of vaccinated individuals, with higher rates among adolescent and young adult males. According to the agency, these safety updates do not alter their overall assessment that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks for most people.
At this stage, the FDA has not confirmed any causal connection between COVID-19 vaccines and the deaths under review. Officials say they will assess all available evidence before drawing conclusions and will release findings once the investigation is complete.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: European Union (EU) officials are upset that the U.S. National Security Strategy views the EU as in decline and opposed to U.S. interests.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: European Union (EU) Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau, and the broader Trump administration.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The National Security Strategy was released last week; Kubilius commented on it on December 10.
💬KEY QUOTE: The agenda of the EU is “utterly adverse to the U.S.” – Christopher Landau
🎯IMPACT: The U.S. strategy could lead to fewer U.S. troops in Europe and a shift in relations with the EU.
IN FULL
In a blog post on December 10, Andrius Kubilius, the European Union (EU) Commissioner for Defense and Space, complained that the new 2025 United States National Security Strategy (NSS) is a “direct challenge to European unity.” The NSS, signed by President Donald J. Trump, portrays Europe as a continent in decline, warning that it faces “civilisational erasure” if migration, demographic change, and excessive regulation and censorship continue. It argues that Europe’s economic slump and internal policies weaken the continent’s reliability as an ally and predicts that parts of Europe could be “unrecognizable” within two decades.
The strategy implicitly supports nationalist and populist political movements in some EU countries. According to media reports, an unpublished version of the document singled out nations such as Austria, Hungary, Italy, and Poland as potential partners for America to draw away from the EU.
In response, Kubilius said the strategy clearly signals U.S. intent to “fight against European unity.” He warned that the document frames EU institutions, migration policies, and Europe’s evolving identity as threats to U.S. strategic interests.
U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau has reportedly said the EU’s agenda is “utterly adverse to the U.S.” and does not align with the Trump administration on China. The NSS also includes a Global Posture Review, which will determine U.S. troop deployments worldwide, including in Europe, under the reshaped strategic priorities.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal appeals court has allowed the Pentagon’s restrictions on military service by transgenders to remain in effect while litigation continues.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: War Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Department of War, plaintiffs challenging the policy, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued Tuesday by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, as litigation continues in the Talbott v. United Statescase.
💬KEY QUOTE: “American Greatness. Military Lethality. Common Sense. And THE LAW.” – Pete Hegseth.
🎯IMPACT: The ruling allows the Pentagon to enforce the transgender ban immediately, affecting thousands of service members and setting the stage for further legal battles.
IN FULL
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has granted the Pentagon’s request for its restrictions on transgender military service to remain in effect while a lawsuit continues. Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao authored the majority opinion, concluding that the Department of War is likely to succeed on the merits and that the lower court failed to provide appropriate deference to military judgment. War Secretary Pete Hegseth praised the ruling on X, writing, “American Greatness. Military Lethality. Common Sense. And THE LAW.”
He called the decision a “major legal victory” and argued that maintaining strict medical and readiness standards is essential for the armed forces. Hegseth has frequently criticized policies he views as driven by ideology, saying, “No more pronouns. No more climate change obsession. No more dudes in dresses – we’re done with that s**t.”
The decision ensures that the Pentagon will continue enforcing its restrictions while the case, Talbott v. United States, moves forward. The policy aligns with Executive Order 14183, issued in January 2025, which directs the military to bar individuals who identify with a gender different from their biological sex from serving. Following that order, the Pentagon suspended new enlistments for people diagnosed with gender dysphoria and limited access to mutilating “gender-affirming” medical care within the ranks.
Pentagon data from late 2024 indicated that roughly 4,240 active-duty, reserve, and National Guard personnel had been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. About 1,000 have already begun voluntary separation, and officials plan to review medical files to identify others for involuntary discharge once the voluntary window closes. The department has cited studies, including the AMSARA analysis and a 2022 review, reporting higher nondeployability rates and elevated risks of depression, PTSD, and suicidal ideation among transgender service members compared with normal troops.
District Court Judge Ana Reyes previously blocked the restrictions, stating they appeared motivated by disapproval of transgender identity rather than operational necessity. Judge Cornelia Pillard, dissenting in the appeals court decision, similarly claimed that the policy was not supported by evidence and could abruptly end longstanding military careers.
The plaintiffs in Talbott v. United States are evaluating their next steps as the case proceeds in the D.C. Circuit, with the possibility of ultimately going to the Supreme Court.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A crude oil tanker, used for transporting sanctioned oil from Venezuela and Iran, was seized.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the United States Coast Guard, the U.S. military, and the Department of War.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: December 10, 2025, off the coast of Venezuela.
💬KEY QUOTE: “This seizure, completed off the coast of Venezuela, was conducted safely and securely.” – Pam Bondi
🎯IMPACT: The seizure disrupts an illicit oil shipping network supporting foreign terrorist organizations.
IN FULL
On December 10, 2025, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi released video of a sanctioned, officially stateless crude oil tanker involved in transporting sanctioned oil from Venezuela and Iran being seized by U.S. forces. The operation was executed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and the United States Coast Guard, with support from the U.S. Navy and the Department of War.
The tanker, which was en route to Cuba, had “For multiple years… been sanctioned by the United States due to its involvement in an illicit oil shipping network supporting foreign terrorist organizations,” Bondi stated. “This seizure, completed off the coast of Venezuela, was conducted safely and securely—and our investigation alongside the Department of Homeland Security to prevent the transport of sanctioned oil continues.”
The action marks a significant step in disrupting networks that facilitate the flow of resources to entities deemed as threats to U.S. and international security.
WATCH:
Today, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Homeland Security Investigations, and the United States Coast Guard, with support from the Department of War, executed a seizure warrant for a crude oil tanker used to transport sanctioned oil from Venezuela and Iran. For multiple… pic.twitter.com/dNr0oAGl5x
❓WHAT HAPPENED:China launched three Long March rockets into space within 19 hours, setting a new record for launch cadence.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) and China’s space agency.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The launches occurred on Tuesday, with the rockets lifting off from China.
💬KEY QUOTE: “The launch mission was a complete success,” the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation stated.
🎯IMPACT: The record-breaking launches highlight China’s ambition to become a space superpower, with plans to expand its orbital infrastructure.
IN FULL
China has broken a record for launch cadence by successfully launching three Long March rockets into space within 19 hours on Tuesday. This achievement surpassed the previous record held by SpaceX, which launched three Falcon rockets in 20 hours and 3 minutes in March 2024.
The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) confirmed the success of the mission, stating, “The launch mission was a complete success.” The launches bring China’s total orbital launches this year to 83, a significant step in the country’s bid to expand its space capabilities.
One of the launches delivered Internet satellites into low-Earth orbit to join the Guowang constellation, which now has over 100 operational satellites. The other two launches involved classified satellites intended for military use. State-owned China SatNet plans to grow the Guowang constellation to 13,000 satellites, comparable to SpaceX’s Starlink network, which currently operates nearly 9,000 satellites.
China’s space ambitions extend beyond satellite launches. The country has established its own space station, Tiangong, following its exclusion from the International Space Station (ISS) due to U.S. national security concerns. Tiangong hosted its first crew in 2021 and continues to operate, with three astronauts currently on board. Last month, an uncrewed spacecraft was launched to the station as part of a rescue mission following damage to a prior craft that left one group of astronauts stranded on the station.
SpaceX retains the record for the most orbital launches in a single year, having already surpassed its 2022 record of 134 launches. The company aims to reach 178 launches by the end of 2025.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
