Monday, November 3, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Hunter Biden Blames Democrat Losses on Lack of Loyalty to His Father.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Hunter Biden claimed that the Democratic Party’s 2024 election loss stemmed from abandoning his father, Joe Biden, as the party’s leader, arguing the party “literally melted down.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Biden Sr.’s physician Kevin O’Connor, and Biden White House aides.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Comments made on the At Our Table podcast, set to air Thursday, July 17, 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We lost the last election because we did not remain loyal to the leader of the party.” – Hunter Biden

🎯IMPACT: Hunter Biden’s remarks point to internal party struggles, with further scrutiny on Joe Biden’s health and leadership during the campaign.

IN FULL

Hunter Biden, the son of former President Joe Biden, says the Democratic Party’s 2024 election loss was due to its decision to abandon his father as its leader, claiming the party “literally melted down.” Speaking on the At Our Table podcast hosted by former Democratic National Committee chairman Jaime Harrison, Hunter Biden defended his father’s controversial legacy and lashed out at those behind the machinations that saw former President Biden drop out of the presidential race on July 21, 2024.

“We lost the election because we did not remain loyal to the leader of the party,” Biden said, according to excerpts of the conversation released prior to the podcast’s airing on Thursday. “That’s my position. We had the advantage of incumbency. We had the advantage of an incredibly successful administration, and the Democratic Party literally melted down.”

The comments from Hunter Biden come as former White House staff are facing a Congressional inquiry into allegations that they covered up former President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline and used an autopen device to sign presidential directives without the octogenarian Democrat’s knowledge. Most recently, Biden’s White House doctor, Kevin O’Connor, pleaded the Fifth, refusing to answer questions from the House Oversight Committee.

Following a disastrous June 2024 presidential debate performance, Joe Biden was pressured by Democratic leaders and some of his senior staff to exit the race, as polling showed a catastrophic defeat for the party up and down the November ballot. Addressing the alleged cover-up of his father’s cognitive decline, Hunter Biden argued “the idea of a conspiracy” is a ploy peddled by journalists trying to sell books and that hiding a President’s declining health would be impossible in Washington, D.C.

Hunter Biden then denied allegations that he acted as a key advisor to his father, telling Harrison that he “stayed as far away” as he could during the campaign. Notably, Hunter Biden faced federal gun and tax fraud charges at the time.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Whistleblower Reveals BBC Doctored Trump Speech to Look Like He Incited Riot.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A whistleblower revealed that the BBC altered footage of a speech by President Donald J. Trump to make it appear he was inciting a riot at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The BBC, Donald Trump, and Michael Prescott, a former BBC standards committee adviser.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The BBC Panorama programme Trump: A Second Chance? including the doctored speech aired in October 2024, with the report on the scandal emerging in November 2025.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It was completely misleading to edit the clip in the way Panorama aired it.” – Michael Prescott

🎯IMPACT: The revelation could affect the BBC’s relationship with the White House.

IN FULL

An internal whistleblowing memo has revealed that the BBC edited footage of a speech by President Donald J. Trump, making it appear as though he was encouraging a riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. This information, contained in a 19-page whistleblowing memo, reveals that the BBC Panorama programme Trump: A Second Chance? misled viewers by splicing together different parts of Trump’s speech to create a false narrative.

“The spliced together version of Trump’s comments aired by Panorama made it seem that [President] said: ‘We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you and we fight. We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not gonna have a country anymore,'” reads the whistleblowing memo on the scandal, which was sent to BBC managers.

“In reality, the first part of Trump’s speech: ‘We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you,’ came 15 minutes into the speech. The second half of the sentence that was aired by Panorama, ‘and we fight. We fight like hell…’ came 54 minutes later,” it notes, adding: “Fifteen minutes into the speech, Trump actually said: ‘We are gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you. I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.'”

The memo brands Panorama‘s spliced clip “completely misleading,” stressing that the “fact that [President Trump] did not explicitly exhort supporters to go down and fight at Capitol Hill was one of the reasons there were no federal charges for incitement to riot.”

Notably, the Panorma programme also cuts in footage of men marching on the Capitol following Trump’s speech, when in fact they marched on the Capitol before the President began speaking.

Michael Prescott, a former member of the BBC’s standards committee, authored the memo. He criticized the BBC for ignoring serious complaints about the programme’s bias and for failing to address the issue. Notably, Prescott sent his findings to the BBC’s board and chairman, India-born Samir Shah, urging them to address the problem, but he received no response.

Prescott also raised issues about the programme’s clear anti-Trump bias, with ten critics interviewed for it against just one supporter, and no similar programme examining Trump’s rival, then-Vice President Kamala Harris, being produced. As a compulsory television license fee funds it, the BBC is required to be balanced and impartial in its coverage—although there is little enforcement of this requirement, and it is widely regarded as having an institutional left-wing bias.

Image by Matt Cornock.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

CAIR SuperPAC Is Mamdani Campaign’s Biggest Backer, Linda Sarsour Claims.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has emerged as one of the dark money funders of Zohran Mamdani, the Democrats’ socialist candidate for New York City mayor.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Zohran Mamdani, CAIR, Linda Sarour, and the American-Muslim community.

📍WHEN & WHERE:. Contributions made over the course of the 2025 New York City mayoral race.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The story is not just that it’s random that Zohran ascended to this place, it is our Muslim-American communities… and I will also say that it’s Muslim money, the PACs that have supported Zohran or a particular PAC that has supported Zohran, is probably over 80 percent of Mulsim-American donors in this country.” — Linda Sarsour

🎯IMPACT: The financial support from CAIR and the broader Muslim community is not without strings attached, according to Sarsour

IN FULL

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has emerged as one of the dark money funders of Zohran Mamdani, the Democrats’ socialist candidate for New York City mayor. Campaign finance records show the group—with alleged ties to Islamic extremists—both directly and indirectly funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars to Mamdani’s mayoral campaign over the last year. In addition, Islamist activist Linda Sarsour claims CAIR has been instrumental in pushing the broader American Mulsim community to contribute to Mamdani, making its impact far larger than data suggests.

“Right now, I’m a little more quiet, because I’m on the quiet side of this race,” Sarsour told attendees at CAIR’s National Leadership and Policy Conference in September. “But I’m going to tell you that once November 4 comes around, I will tell the story. The story is not just that it’s random that Zohran ascended to this place, it is our Muslim-American communities… and I will also say that it’s Muslim money, the PACs that have supported Zohran or a particular PAC that has supported Zohran, is probably over 80 percent of Mulsim-American donors in this country.”

“And I want to make the point that the Unity and Justice Fund PAC, which is the CAIR SuperPAC, was the largest institutional donor to the pro-Zorhan PAC  in New York,” Sarsour claimed.


The financial support from CAIR and the broader Muslim community is not without strings attached, something Sarsour made clear in an Instagram live stream this past Saturday. “I just want you all to know I’m not going to work for the Zohran administration. I’m not going to work in City Hall, because, guess what? There gotta be people like me willing to stay outside,” she said.

Sarsour also warned Mamdani: “Our friends on the inside need people on the outside to hold them accountable. To say, ‘We see you. We’re paying attention.’”

Image by Festival of Faiths.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Fetterman Admits Democrats Are to Blame for Government Shutdown.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) admitted that Democrats are responsible for the government shutdown.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: John Fetterman, CNN’s Jake Tapper, the Trump White House, and Democrats.

📍WHEN & WHERE: November 2025, on CNN.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I feel like the Democrats really need to own the shutdown.” – John Fetterman

🎯IMPACT: The admission highlights internal conflict among Democrats over the strategy of shutting down the federal government to make tax subsidies permanent.

IN FULL

Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) admitted during a recent interview that his party bears responsibility for the ongoing federal government shutdown. Fetterman said, “I feel like the Democrats really need to own the shutdown. I mean, we’re shutting it down. I know why. They claim because they want to address the tax credits. And I fully support that.”

The current budget impasse stems from Democrats’ push to make permanent certain COVID-era tax subsidies tied to the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare. Republicans, meanwhile, have called for the passage of a short-term continuing resolution (CR) to reopen and fund the government before addressing the dispute over the subsidies.

Fetterman, who has generally supported measures to keep the government funded, emphasized his consistent record on such votes. “I voted for all of their CRs, our CRs, every single time,” he said, warning of the consequences of a prolonged shutdown. He highlighted the risks for millions of Americans dependent on federal nutrition assistance (SNAP), noting, “We can’t be putting 42 million people who rely on food stamps in danger because of political gridlock.”

Although Fetterman said he supports extending the Obamacare healthcare subsidies, he was sharply critical of his party’s tactics, arguing that using a shutdown as leverage is hypocritical. “It was wrong when the Republicans did it. It’s wrong now that we seem to be driving it,” he said.

The Pennsylvania senator’s remarks add to his growing reputation as one of the most outspoken and unconventional voices in the Democratic Party. Over the past year, Fetterman has taken several positions that have surprised members of both parties. In October, he said he would consider backing a Republican-led effort to abolish the Senate filibuster, calling the procedural tool “a weapon for gridlock.” Fetterman has also collaborated with Republican senators on legislation aimed at curbing Chinese influence in U.S. agriculture, particularly concerning the purchase of American farmland by companies linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Despite his occasional alignment with GOP priorities, Fetterman has repeatedly dismissed rumors that he might switch parties. In January, he called such speculation “amateur hour” and insisted, “It’s not gonna happen. Even if I wanted to do that, that is a rocket sled to Palookaville. I would make a pretty bad Republican.”

Image by Tom Wolf.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Quarter of Foreign Predators in UK Prisons Hail from Just Five Nations.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: British Ministry of Justice (MOJ) data reveals a quarter of jailed foreign sex offenders in England and Wales come from just five countries.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Foreign nationals from Romania, Pakistan, Poland, Ireland, and India.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Data pertains to prisoners in England and Wales as of June.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is yet more evidence that migrants from some nationalities are more likely to commit certain crimes.” – Shadow Secretary of State for Justice Robert Jenrick

🎯IMPACT: The data highlights concerns over foreign nationals’ involvement in serious crimes, prompting calls for transparency and action.

IN FULL

Recent figures from the British Ministry of Justice (MOJ) show that a large proportion of foreign nationals imprisoned for sexual offences in England and Wales come from just five countries. The first analysis of prisoners’ crimes by nationality reveals that offenders from Romania, Pakistan, Poland, Ireland, and India make up 457 of the 1,731 foreign sex offenders behind bars as of June. Together, they represent around one in four of all jailed foreign sex offenders.

On a per capita basis, Bangladeshi migrants are by far the most likely to be imprisoned for sex crimes, with over 42 percent of those in British prisons convicted of sexual offenses. Kenyans are behind them at 37 percent, followed by Sudanese, Ethiopians, and Eritreans.

The total number of foreign nationals imprisoned for sex crimes has risen by 9.9 percent in the past year, compared with a 3.8 percent increase in British offenders convicted of similar offences. The data, released following a Freedom of Information request, comes amid growing public concern about serious crimes, including sexual crimes, committed by migrants, and the handling of foreign national offenders by the authorities. For instance, Ethiopian asylum seeker Hadush Kebatu, deported after being convicted of a series of sexual assaults in Essex, England, drew national attention when it was revealed that the Home Office paid him several hundred pounds to comply with his deportation order. Kebatu, whose crimes sparked anti-mass migration protests and riots, had previously been released from prison in error and let loose among the public again, leading to a national manhunt.

Other recent cases have also further fuelled public anger. In London, an Egyptian-born asylum seeker who entered the UK illegally was convicted of raping a woman in Hyde Park; he was later found to have a previous conviction in Egypt for plotting terrorist attacks. In Manchester, a Syrian who carried out a terrorist attack against a synagogue turned out to be on bail for an alleged rape when he struck.

Robert Jenrick, the Shadow Justice Secretary, remarked that the public deserves full transparency about the nationality of offenders and the Labour Party government’s management of their cases. “This is yet more evidence that migrants from some nationalities are more likely to commit certain crimes,” he said, calling for the Ministry of Justice to publish all related data.

Image by JV.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Judge Orders Trump to Make SNAP Payments with Money the Govt Doesn’t Have.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) food benefits may end up being at least partially distributed on Monday, following a controversial order by U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of Rhode Island.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell, Jr., the Trump administration, SNAP beneficiaries.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The ruling was issued Friday, with further clarification over the weekend, and a noon Monday deadline for the government to respond.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I do not want Americans to go hungry. [I] ask the Court to clarify how we can legally fund SNAP as soon as possible. . . . If we are given the appropriate legal direction by the Court, it will BE MY HONOR to provide the funding.” — President Donald J. Trump

🎯IMPACT: The ruling has drawn extensive criticism from the legal community as well as confusion from the Trump White House, as it requires the administration to tap a small emergency reserve of around $5.25 billion to cover $8.5 billion in November SNAP benefits.

IN FULL

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) food benefits may end up being at least partially distributed on Monday, following a controversial order by U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of Rhode Island. Appointed to the bench by former President Barack Obama, McConnell’s ruling has drawn extensive criticism from the legal community, as well as confusion from the Trump White House, as it requires the administration to tap a small emergency reserve of around $5.25 billion to cover $8.5 billion in November SNAP benefits.

“I do not want Americans to go hungry. [I] ask the Court to clarify how we can legally fund SNAP as soon as possible. . . . If we are given the appropriate legal direction by the Court, it will BE MY HONOR to provide the funding,” President Donald J. Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social late Friday. This prompted McConnell to issue guidance over the weekend, essentially telling the administration to find the extra funds—though he acknowledged this must be done in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act. Impossibly, the judge ordered that benefits must begin processing by the end of Monday, and partial payment should be completed by Wednesday.

However, Judge McConnell’s order may not withstand further legal scrutiny from the appellate court or potentially the U.S. Supreme Court. Foremost, the ruling—which strangely takes the form of a “temporary restraining order” despite compelling an action rather than barring it—is universal in application, likely running afoul of a Supreme Court ruling earlier this year that limited such nationwide orders to only class-action lawsuits. In a footnote, the judge offers a weak defense of the order’s nationwide application, simply claiming that “a limited order would not provide complete relief.”

In addition, it appears Judge McConnell only considered the congressional appropriation aspect of the SNAP program and benefit payments during the Senate Democrat-caused government shutdown. The judge failed to consider the issue of the SNAP program itself, which is not currently in existence—in a technical sense—since its congressional authorization lapsed in 2023 and has been temporarily reauthorized through subsequent continuing resolutions (CRs). When Senate Democrats blocked the CR to temporarily fund the government on October 1, they also blocked the underlying SNAP reauthorization.

“Is there money in a contingency fund? Sure, probably. At minimum there’s $3b available through 09/2026. Maybe there’s another $3b available through 09/2027 but none of that necessarily matters,” former Senate Judiciary Committee counsel Mike Fragoso noted in a post on X (formerly Twitter). “You see, the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 was most recently reauthorized in the 2018 Farm Bill. That authorization ran out in 2023 and subsequent CRs have *carried that authorization* for their length. This means that SNAP’s authorization expired with the CR on October 1st. The program is no longer in effect, and with it this entitlement.”

Image by Katrin Bolovtsova.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Nearly One Million People Victimized by Migrants from Top Refugee Countries.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: An analysis of police crime statistics in Germany shows nearly one million victims of crimes committed by foreign suspects from key refugee-origin countries.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The populist, anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany (AfD) parliamentary group initiated the analysis of Police Crime Statistics (PKS) data.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The data covers the period from 2015 to 2024 in Germany.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The number of victims is increasing – in parallel with the number of refugees.” – Focus Magazine

🎯IMPACT: The report highlights the significant rise in crime victims in Germany directly linked to the migrant crisis of 2015-16 and subsequent chain migration.

IN FULL

From 2015 to 2024, roughly 426,000 Germans fell victim to offenses carried out by suspects originating from ten key refugee-sending nations. In that timeframe, about 512,000 non-Germans were also victimized by migrants from this same group. This examination of Police Crime Statistics (PKS) comes from a parliamentary query submitted by the populist, anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany (AfD) parliamentary group.

The AfD selected ten nations for scrutiny, namely Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Morocco, Algeria, Iran, Nigeria, Somalia, Pakistan, and Georgia, as they have contributed significant refugee populations to Germany. Through PKS data, nationals of these countries have been tallied against victims of crime.

Victim numbers have surged markedly since 2015, aligning with the influx of people from these ten countries into Germany. The fewest cases were reported in 2020 and 2021, mirroring the broader decline in crime rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Syrians boast the most victims, with 35,668, followed by Afghanistan, with 72,190. All have over 10,000.

In terms of particular crimes, the data indicates that, for instance, Algerian nationals are accused of robbery 12,685 percent more frequently than Germans, with similarly elevated rates for Georgians (3,846 percent higher), Libyans (3,641 percent higher), and Tunisians (3,132 percent higher).

Image by Markus Spiske.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

TPUSA Denies Israeli Claim That Erika Kirk Is Accepting Award in Jerusalem on His Behalf.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Turning Point USA (TPUSA) refuted claims by the Israeli government that Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, is set to accept an award on his behalf in Jerusalem.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Erika Kirk, TPUSA, and Israel’s Government Press Office.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The Christian Media Summit in Jerusalem, this week.

💬KEY QUOTE: “This is the first we’re hearing of this!” – TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet

🎯IMPACT: TPUSA has confirmed Erika Kirk’s non-attendance and requested a correction from the Israeli press.

IN FULL

Turning Point USA (TPUSA), founded by assassinated conservative youth organizer Charlie Kirk, has disputed claims made by the Israeli government that Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow, is set to accept an award on his behalf at the Christian Media Summit in Jerusalem this week.

The summit, organized by Israel’s Government Press Office (GPO) along with the Israeli Foreign Ministry and the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, is hosting over 100 Christian figures and includes an award ceremony recognizing participants for their “exceptional contribution” to Israeli public diplomacy worldwide, as reported by The Times of Israel.

Andrew Kolvet, a spokesman for TPUSA and executive producer of The Charlie Kirk Show, expressed surprise at the claims in a post on X (formerly Twitter), stating, “This is the first we’re hearing of this!” He further mentioned that they have reached out to the Israeli press for a correction.

Kolvet also confirmed in another post that “Erika [Kirk] will not be attending” the event.

Charlie Kirk, a longtime supporter of Israel, was experiencing some friction with the Jewish State and its supporters before his assassination. Leaked texts revealed his frustration with Jewish donors, whom he accused of “leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause” due to alleged bullying over his management of TPUSA.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Stabbing Spree on London-Bound Train Leaves Multiple Injured.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Multiple people were stabbed on a train to London, prompting a significant police and emergency response.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Armed police, emergency responders, and passengers on the train. Two suspects have been arrested.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on Saturday evening on the 1825 LNER service from Doncaster to London, near Huntingdon station.

💬KEY QUOTE: “The appalling incident on a train near Huntingdon is deeply concerning.” – Prime Minister Keir Starmer

🎯IMPACT: Train services have been disrupted, with all lines blocked around Huntingdon station. Authorities are investigating the incident.

IN FULL

Two people have been arrested following a stabbing incident on a train heading to Huntingdon. Armed police were deployed to Huntingdon station in Cambridgeshire on Saturday evening after reports of multiple passengers being attacked. Cambridgeshire Police confirmed that officers responded at 7:39 PM after receiving reports of the stabbings.

One eyewitness told media that at least one of the suspects was a black man wearing a black mask. Around 12 people are believed to have needed medical attention. The story is developing.

The train involved was the 1825 London North Eastern Railway (LNER) service from Doncaster to London. More than 30 officers attended the scene, and several individuals were taken to the hospital. The A1307 road near Huntingdon has also been closed. An East of England Ambulance Service spokesperson stated that numerous ambulances, tactical commanders, and critical care teams were dispatched to the site.

Witnesses described chaotic scenes, with one claiming to have seen a man with a large knife and “blood everywhere.” Some passengers reportedly hid in lavatories to escape, while others were trampled during the panic. Another witness told The Mirror newspaper they saw a person “hanging out the train door bleeding.”

Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the event as “deeply concerning,” expressing his thoughts for those affected and thanking the emergency services for their swift response.

Train services in the area have been severely disrupted, with LNER confirming that all lines around Huntingdon station are blocked and disruption expected to last until the end of the day.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Public Now Trusts Nigel Farage More Than PM Starmer to Lead Britain.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A new poll shows Reform Party leader Nigel Farage surpassing Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer in public preference for British prime minister.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Nigel Farage, Prime Minister Starmer, Ipsos polling firm, and British voters.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The Ipsos survey was conducted this week in the United Kingdom.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I am humbled by these figures and promise not to let people down.” – Nigel Farage

🎯IMPACT: Farage’s Reform Party is gaining ground, with the governing Labour Party losing support to the far-left Greens, Reform, and the globalist Liberal Democrats.

IN FULL

Reform Party leader Nigel Farage has Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer as the public’s preferred choice for Prime Minister of the United Kingdom for the first time, according to a new Ipsos survey. The poll found that 33 percent of respondents believe Farage would make the best national leader, compared with 30 percent for Prime Minister Starmer, a sharp reversal from July, when the Labour leader held an eight-point advantage.

The results come amid a slump in support for the leftist Labour Party and a growing shift towards outsider parties such as Farage’s populist-right Reform Party and the far-left Greens. Ipsos also reported that the public now favours Reform’s policies on immigration, taxation, public services, and the economy over those of Labour or other major parties.

Reacting to the figures, Farage said: “I am humbled by these figures and promise not to let people down.” Keiran Pedley, Director of Politics at Ipsos UK, said, “Our data also shows a growing public confidence in Reform’s proposed plans for the economy and immigration, which Britons consistently rank at the top of the issues that they see as most important to them.”

The findings mark a significant setback for Labour, which a separate YouGov poll puts at just 17 percent support, its lowest level in years. That places Labour ten points behind Reform and only a single point ahead of the Greens, who, under socialist leader Zach Polanski, are drawing increasing numbers of disillusioned Labour voters.

Farage’s rise follows a series of developments that have propelled Reform, formerly the Brexit Party, to a serious electoral contender. A September poll projected that Reform could win as many as 311 seats in the House of Commons, placing it within reach of an outright majority. The party has also attracted numerous defections from the formerly governing Conservatives, including 20 local politicians who switched allegiance during the Tory conference earlier this month.

Reports have emerged that the Starmer government is now considering delaying local elections for a second time amid fears of sweeping Reform gains, a move Farage denounced as “completely outrageous.”

Image by Owain.davies.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

FDA Announces Recall of Blood Pressure Drug Due to Cancer Risk.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Over 580,000 bottles of prazosin hydrochloride, a blood pressure medication, were recalled due to potential contamination with a cancer-causing chemical.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Amerisource Health Services, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

📍WHEN & WHERE: Nationwide recall issued earlier this month by New Jersey-based Teva Pharmaceuticals and Amerisource Health Services.

🎯IMPACT: The recall affects patients using prazosin for blood pressure and PTSD-related sleep disturbances, raising concerns over drug safety.

IN FULL

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced the recall of over 580,000 bottles of prazosin hydrochloride, a blood pressure medication, due to concerns over the presence of a potentially cancer-causing chemical. The medication, which is also prescribed for sleep disturbances related to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), was voluntarily recalled by New Jersey-based Teva Pharmaceuticals USA and drug distributor Amerisource Health Services.

The affected capsules, available in 1 mg, 2 mg, and 5 mg doses, were classified by the FDA as a Class II risk. According to the agency, some lots of the medication may contain nitrosamine impurities, which can form during manufacturing or storage and are considered potentially carcinogenic.

The FDA’s recall orders, posted on its website, highlight the potential risks associated with the medication. Teva Pharmaceuticals has not yet responded to requests for comment regarding the recall.

Patients who rely on prazosin hydrochloride for managing blood pressure or PTSD-related conditions are now left questioning the safety of their medication. The recall underscores broader concerns about the pharmaceutical supply chain and the need for stringent oversight in drug manufacturing and storage processes.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.