GET THE APP
Tuesday, January 13, 2026

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
News

Scott Adams Passes Away, Embraces Jesus Christ in Final Message.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Cartoonist and commentator Scott Adams has passed away aged 68.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Scott Adams, Shelly Adams, her sister, and Adams’s stepdaughter.

📍WHEN & WHERE: January 13, 2025, California.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’m not a believer, but I have to admit the risk-reward calculation for doing so looks so attractive to me, so here I go: I accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior and look forward to spending an eternity with him.” – Scott Adams

IN FULL

Scott Adams, the creator of the popular comic strip Dilbert turned political commentator, has passed away aged 68. His ex-wife, Shelly Adams, announced his passing alongside other close associates on his social media channels, where he hosted his “Coffee With Scott Adams” show.

Shelly read a final message from Adams, beginning, “If you are reading this, things did not go well for me. I have a few things to say before I go. My body failed before my brain. I am of sound mind as I write this on January 1, 2026. If you wonder about any of my choices for my estate, or anything else, please know I’m free of any coercion or inappropriate influence of any sort, I promise.”

The message continued, “Next, many of my Christian friends have asked me to find Jesus before I go. I’m not a believer, but I have to admit the risk-reward calculation for doing so looks so attractive to me, so here I go. I accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior and look forward to spending an eternity with him. The part about me not being a believer should be quickly resolved if I wake up in heaven. I won’t need any more convincing than that. I hope I’m still qualified for entry.”

The cartoonist had been battling prostate cancer, which spread to his bones last year, resulting in paralysis from the waist down, with Shelly Adams, her sister, and his stepdaughter helping to care for him.

Adams aligned himself with President Donald J. Trump ahead of the 2016 election, at considerable risk to his career in corporate media, and President Trump, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and other figures close to the administration personally intervened to get him the best possible care towards the end of his life.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

22 minutes ago
William Upton
Politics

New Congressional Minibus Contains Millions in Anti-Trump Deep State Funding.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The United States Congress has released its Financial Services and General Government and National Security and State “minibus”—with mirror drafts authored by the House and Senate Appropriations Committees.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The U.S. Congress, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the Helsinki Commission, and Belize.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The minibus legislation was released on Sunday, January 11, 2026, with funding provisions being exposed over subsequent days.

🎯IMPACT: The legislation includes significant funding for globalist deep state entities like the National Endowment for Democracy and the Helsinki Commission, along with several million dollars for infrastructure projects in Belize.

IN FULL

The United States Congress has released its Financial Services and General Government and National Security and State “minibus”—with mirror drafts authored by the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. Concerningly, the legislation includes significant funding for globalist deep state entities like the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the Helsinki Commission, along with several million dollars for infrastructure projects in Belize.

A congressional minibus is essentially smaller omnibus legislation that includes funding for several government departments and agencies, and is often prone to being filled with unpopular spending that would otherwise not pass as a standalone bill. In this case, the latest minibus contains $315 million for the NED, a quasi-autonomous non-governmental organization (NGO) with a long history of targeting conservative journalists and media outlets.

In February last year, anti-Trump neoconservatives were up in arms over the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) moving to freeze funds for NED. The National Pulse reported at the time that many conservative leaders in the United States and around the world contended that NED squanders funds on undermining right-leaning governments in allied nations, such as Hungary, while boosting leftist media and politicians.

The minibus bill also provides reauthorization for the Helsinki Commission—an independent government agency created in 1975 and tasked with monitoring compliance with the Helsinki Accords. However, the agency has morphed over the years into an entity that promotes color revolutions and unauthorized election interference operations in foreign nations. Additionally, the Helsinki Commission has become a key roost for a number of anti-Trump Russia hoax conspiracy theorists, including former John Brennan aide Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Sir William Browder KCMG, and the leftist Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project’s (OCCRP) Drew Sullivan.

Notably, Browder is a staunch proponent of seizing Russian assets outside of normal government procedures—which could trigger significant backlash—and has routinely accused figures like Donald Trump Jr. and Vice President J.D. Vance of parroting Kremlin talk points. Further, the Helsinki Commission maintains ties to Ukrainian propagandist Illia Ponomarenko and former U.S. Congressman Adam Kinzinger, who has become one of the top Russia conspiracy theorists on social media.

Aside from the direct funding and authorization of NGOs that aim to undermine President Donald J. Trump‘s agenda, the minibus also contains, inexplicably, $5.7 million in funds—ostensibly through the now-defunct USAID—for infrastructure projects in Belize. This funding was likely inserted as an earmark request by lawmakers after USAID itself was dissolved, with its key functions being absorbed by the U.S. Department of State.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

53 minutes ago
Lawfare
World

Le Pen Appeals Ban on Running for Presidency.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: French populist leader Marine Le Pen has begun a high-stakes appeal in Paris against a ruling banning her from running for public office for five years, due to a controversial conviction for embezzling European Union (EU) funds.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Marine Le Pen, her National Rally (RN) party, and Court of Appeal judges.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The appeal began in Paris and will last until February 12, with a ruling expected by the summer.

💬KEY QUOTE: Barring Le Pen from the presidential election would be “deeply worrying for democracy,” said Jordan Bardella, president of the National Rally party.

🎯IMPACT: The outcome of the appeal will determine whether Le Pen can run in the 2027 French presidential election.

IN FULL

Marine Le Pen has launched an appeal in Paris against a conviction that bars her from holding public office for five years, a ruling that could end her hopes of running in France’s 2027 presidential election. The case stems from a 2022 judgment in which Le Pen, leader of the populist National Rally (RN), was found guilty of embezzling approximately $3.2 million in European Union (EU) funds. The court ruled that parliamentary assistants paid by the European Parliament had, in fact, worked for her party rather than on EU legislative duties.

Le Pen, 57, received a four-year prison sentence, with two years suspended, a fine of about $110,000, and an immediate ban from standing for public office. It was a highly controversial ruling, with the line between parliamentary and party work being ill-defined, and even anti-Le Pen journalists conceded that the prosecution appeared selective.

The Paris Court of Appeal will re-examine the case in full, reviewing both factual findings and legal arguments. Hearings are scheduled to run until February 12, with a decision expected by the summer. The timing is crucial, as candidates must register for the 2027 presidential race by March of that year. If the ban is upheld, Le Pen would be unable to stand.

Le Pen has long denied wrongdoing and argues that the case represents politically motivated “lawfare” aimed at removing her from public life. She has been a central figure in French politics for well over a decade, reshaping the party founded by her late father into the National Rally and leading it to achieve record electoral performances. She has run for president three times and was widely seen as a leading contender for 2027 before the conviction.

RN president Jordan Bardella warned that preventing Le Pen from competing would be “deeply worrying for democracy.” Bardella has ruled out running for president himself, instead positioning himself as a future candidate for prime minister. However, recent opinion polls suggest he may outperform Le Pen in some hypothetical presidential matchups, highlighting his growing prominence within the party.

International figures have also weighed in. President Donald J. Trump criticized the prosecution against Le Pen last year, calling it politically driven and urging authorities to “FREE MARINE LE PEN!”

Image by Vox España.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

1 hour ago
William Upton
Politics

Clintons Defy Congressional Subpoena for Testimony on Epstein.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Former President Bill Clinton and his wife, Hillary Clinton, have both refused to comply with a congressional subpoena compelling their testimony before the House Oversight Committee’s inquiry into the activities of deceased pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, attorneys for the Clintons, the House Oversight Committee, Chairman James Comer (R-KY), Congressman Tim Burchett (R-TN), deceased pedophile and financier Jeffrey Epstein, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Supreme Court.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The Clintons were scheduled to testify on Tuesday and Wednesday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I hope there might be some charges over at [the Department of Justice].” — Rep. Tim Burchett

🎯IMPACT: The rejection of the congressional subpoena is likely to be the subject of a DOJ criminal referral and extensive litigation regarding the Supreme Court’s decisions in Watkins v. United States and Trump v. United States.

IN FULL

Former President Bill Clinton and his wife, Hillary Clinton, have both refused to comply with a congressional subpoena compelling their testimony before the House Oversight Committee’s inquiry into the activities of deceased pedophile and financier Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony was slated for Tuesday and Wednesday; however, an attorney representing the Clintons stated that neither would appear before the House panel and argued that the congressional subpoena is “legally unenforceable.”

The refusal to testify and rejection of the congressional subpoena could set up a contempt of Congress showdown between House Republicans and the Clintons, with a possible criminal referral to the Department of Justice (DOJ). “President and Secretary Clinton have already provided the limited information they possess about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to the Committee,” the Clinton attorneys’ letter to Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) reads. “They did so proactively and voluntarily, and despite the fact that the Subpoenas are invalid and legally unenforceable, untethered to a valid legislative purpose, unwarranted because they do not seek pertinent information, and an unprecedented infringement on the separation of powers.”

“Your continued insistence that the former President and Secretary of State can be compelled to appear before the Committee under these circumstances, however, brings us toward a protracted and unnecessary legal confrontation that distracts from the principal work of the Congress with respect to this matter, which, if conducted sincerely, could help ensure the victims of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell are afforded some measure of justice for the crimes perpetrated against them, however late,” the letter adds.

The Clintons’ attorney cites the Supreme Court‘s Watkins decision, which states, “These are functions of the executive and judicial departments of government. No inquiry is an end in itself; it must be related to, and in furtherance of, a legitimate task of the Congress.” The attorneys contend that the House inquiry is not related to legislative business and, therefore, the subpoenas are unenforceable.

However, not all members of the House Oversight Committee agree with the legal analysis provided by the attorneys for the Clintons. Congressman Tim Burchett (R-TN) stated, “I hope there might be some charges over at [DOJ].”

Further, the Supreme Court has been clear that former presidents do not enjoy blanket immunity for their actions, and the Watkins decision on its face appears intended to apply to Congressional subpoenas involving current and not former members of the executive and judicial branches, suggesting the argument of the attorneys for Bill and Hillary Clinton—neither of whom currently holds office—is a stretch at best.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

2 hours ago
Media

BBC Seeks Dismissal of Trump’s $5 Billion Defamation Claim.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has filed a motion to dismiss President Donald J. Trump’s lawsuit over how his January 6, 2021, speech was manipulated in a Panorama documentary.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump and the BBC, including its Panorama documentary team.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed in a Florida court last month, and the motion to dismiss was filed on Monday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “As we have made clear previously, we will be defending this case. We are not going to make further comment on ongoing legal proceedings.” – BBC spokesman

🎯IMPACT: The case has raised questions about media accountability and the legal jurisdiction of international broadcasters.

IN FULL

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has filed a motion to dismiss President Donald J. Trump’s multi-billion dollar lawsuit over the deceptive editing of his January 6, 2021, aired during a Panorama documentary ahead of the 2024 presidential election. The lawsuit, filed in a Florida court last month, accuses the BBC of defamation and violating trade practices law.

Court documents filed on Monday reveal that the BBC contends the Florida court lacks “personal jurisdiction” over the broadcaster, that the venue is “improper,” and that President Trump has “failed to state a claim.” The BBC previously apologized for the edit but rejected Trump’s demands for compensation, maintaining there is no basis for a defamation claim.

The broadcaster will also contend that the Panorama program was not aired in the United States and therefore did not defame Trump in the jurisdiction in which he seeks relief. It further argues that Trump has not demonstrated actual damage caused by the documentary, noting that he was re-elected and carried Florida with a commanding majority after the Panorama program aired. Trump claims the documentary was available on the Britbox service and accessible to American viewers, which the BBC disputes.

Additionally, the BBC asserts that Trump cannot plausibly allege “actual malice” in the documentary’s publication. The doctored clip, which is approximately 15 seconds long, was part of an hour-long television program that, according to the broadcaster, offered a balanced portrayal of his 2024 re-election campaign. An internal BBC memo leaked in November criticized the editing of the speech, and the scandal surrounding it has led to the resignations of senior BBC officials, including Director General Tim Davie and Head of News Deborah Turness.

In its motion, the BBC has also requested the court to “stay all other discovery” pending a decision on its motion to dismiss. A proposed trial date in 2027 has been indicated if the case proceeds. A BBC spokesman stated, “As we have made clear previously, we will be defending this case. We are not going to make further comment on ongoing legal proceedings.”

Image by Paul Harrop.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

3 hours ago
War
World

Americans Urged to ‘Leave Iran Now’ as Death Toll Among Protesters, Security Forces Hits 2,000.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: Iran has acknowledged a death toll of approximately 2,000 people following two weeks of nationwide unrest, reportedly including security personnel. The Trump administration is urging U.S. citizens in the country to “Leave Iran now.”

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Iranian protesters, regime forces, U.S. President Donald J. Trump, European Union (EU) leaders, and U.S. citizens in Iran.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Protests began in late December 2025 across Iran, with significant unrest reported in Tehran and over 100 cities nationwide.

💬KEY QUOTE: “We are now witnessing the final days and weeks of this regime,” predicted German Chancellor (Prime Minister) Friedrich Merz.

🎯IMPACT: The unrest has drawn international condemnation, sanctions proposals, and heightened tensions between Iran and Western nations, including the United States.

IN FULL

The Iranian regime has acknowledged for the first time that approximately 2,000 people have died in its crackdown on more than two weeks of nationwide protests, including security personnel. The collapse of the national currency, the rial, initially triggered the demonstrations. Notably, opposition sources and activists say the true death toll is significantly higher.

The U.S. Virtual Embassy in Tehran has instructed Americans in no uncertain terms to “Leave Iran now,” stressing that “U.S. citizens should expect continued internet outages, plan alternative means of communication, and, if safe to do so, consider departing Iran by land to Armenia or [Turkey].”

U.S. President Donald J. Trump, who has said that Iran’s Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, may be planning to flee the country, has imposed a 25 percent tariff on countries still trading with Iran. He is also said to be considering military strikes against the regime, having previously warned he would take action if it started killing demonstrators.

Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, claims the Islamic Republic is “prepared for any action” but is willing to engage in talks. Human rights organizations report thousands of detentions, with the group HRANA estimating more than 10,700 arrests. Footage from the demonstrations depicts intense confrontations on the streets, torched cars, and damaged structures.

German Chancellor (Prime Minister) Friedrich Merz has predicted that Iran’s leadership is facing its “final days.” The European Union (EU) is weighing additional sanctions against Iranian figures involved in the harsh suppression of the unrest. The bloc has previously imposed measures on over 230 people and organizations, including elements of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

4 hours ago
Crime
Immigration
News

Noem Just Told Somalis to Leave the U.S. by This Date.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration is ending Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somali nationals, with a deadline set for March 17 for them to leave the country.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Somali nationals.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced on January 13, with a deadline of March 17.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Temporary means temporary,” said Secretary Noem.

🎯IMPACT: The decision affects 2,471 Somali nationals with TPS and an additional 1,383 with pending applications.

IN FULL

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has announced the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somali nationals, setting a deadline of March 17 for them to exit the United States. This decision comes during heightened scrutiny of the Somali community following major fraud scandals in Minnesota.

The move aligns with President Donald J. Trump’s previous remarks expressing disapproval of Somali immigration, with Somalis being associated disproportionately with crime and welfare dependency across the West. Noem emphasized that “Country conditions in Somalia have improved to the point that it no longer meets the law’s requirement for Temporary Protected Status.”

“Further, allowing Somali nationals to remain temporarily in the United States is contrary to our national interests. We are putting Americans first,” she added. Attorney General Pam Bondi has previously confirmed 85 fraud-related charges against Somalis and 60 convictions in Minnesota alone, with further large-scale investigations ongoing into Somali-run daycares in the state.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) sources indicate that there are currently 2,471 Somali nationals residing in the United States under TPS, with another 1,383 applications pending review.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

5 hours ago
Bonkers Britain
Health

White House Criticizes UK Govt for Supporting Cousin Marriage.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The White House criticized Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer for not supporting a ban on first-cousin marriages.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy Sarah Rogers and Prime Minister Starmer.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Rogers criticized the British government on X over the weekend.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’ve received some questions about what we mean, in our National Security Strategy, when we invoke ‘civilizational’ concerns. So I’m tweeting a relevant news item,” Rogers posted, sharing footage from Britain’s House of Commons showing Starmer declining to support a ban on first-cousin marriage.

🎯IMPACT: The debate highlights national and international tensions over minority cultural practices and public health in the United Kingdom.

IN FULL

The Trump administration has criticized Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and his Labour Party government in Britain for declining to support legislation that would have banned marriage between first cousins, calling the issue a matter of “civilisational” importance.

Sarah Rogers, Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy at the U.S. State Department, described President Donald J. Trump’s free speech tsar, posted a video on X highlighting Starmer’s refusal last year to back a bill that sought to outlaw cousin marriage, which is extremely common among certain minority groups in the country, such as Pakistanis. Rogers framed Labour’s stance as a “civilizational” issue, of the type recently highlighted in a national security report.

Rogers also tied the issue to moves by the British government to ban X, supposedly because its Grok AI has been used to alter images of people to show them wearing bikinis—characterized as image-based sexual abuse. “Since we know the British Government wants to make sure women are safe both online and offline (thus contemplating a Russia-style X ban, to protect them from bikini images), here’s more from Wikipedia on cousin marriage – and its connection to honour killing,” she posted, alongside a screenshot from the left-leaning online encyclopedia highlighting the way women in first cousin marriages can be subject to violence by their families.

The debate over cousin marriage in Britain has intensified in recent months. It remains legal across the United Kingdom despite well-documented health risks: children born to closely related parents have a higher likelihood of inheriting recessive genetic conditions compared with the general population, and such unions are also associated with lower IQ and psychosis.

While there are some historic examples, such as the marriage of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, first-cousin marriage is extremely uncommon among the White British population, and is even rarer in Catholic Europe, due to the Church banning the practice in the Middle Ages. Instead, its growth in the modern era is due almost entirely to immigrants from Africa and Asia, as well as their descendants.

The controversy has also engulfed Britain’s socialized National Health Service (NHS). NHS England’s Genomics Education Programme published guidance last autumn that sparked intense backlash for suggesting first-cousin marriages can offer benefits such as “stronger extended family support systems and economic advantages” while downplaying the increased risks of congenital anomalies.

Public opinion surveys conducted in recent years show significant opposition among Britons to keeping cousin marriage legal, with broad majorities across the political spectrum saying the law should be changed. It is regulated at the state level in the U.S., with most states either prohibiting it or restricting it only to elderly or infertile couples. However, it is unrestricted in Alabama, Alaska California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., with North Carolina also permitting it except for “double first cousins” who share two sets of grandparents.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

6 hours ago
Immigration
UK

Boat Migrant Raped Teen Within Weeks of Arriving.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Kurdish migrant was sentenced to seven years in prison for raping a teenager in a park weeks after arriving in Britain.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Mehmet Ogur, a 27-year-old Kurdish asylum seeker, and his 18-year-old victim.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The crime occurred last year in a park in Tamworth, Staffordshire, and sentencing took place at Stafford Crown Court, England.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Your continued stay in the United Kingdom will be for others to determine, not for me,” said Judge John Edwards

🎯IMPACT: The case highlights concerns over the mismanagement of poorly vetted asylum seekers arriving in Britain on small boats, and the threat they pose to public safety.

IN FULL

A Kurdish migrant who arrived in Britain by boat has been jailed for seven years after being convicted of raping an 18-year-old in a park just weeks after entering the country. Mehmet Ogur was sentenced at Stafford Crown Court after a jury found him guilty of rape and attempted rape following a trial last summer. The court heard that Ogur had been living at a hotel in Tamworth, Staffordshire, at taxpayers’ expense when he carried out his crimes.

Prosecutors said Ogur met the victim after communicating with her on Snapchat. Following the attack, police recovered messages sent by Ogur that were described as a “full and complete” admission of what he had done. Ogur still denied the charges and claimed the meaning of his messages had been changed by Google Translate, but the jury rejected his explanation.

Passing sentence, Judge John Edwards said the offence had caused “immense harm” to the victim. Addressing Ogur, the judge added, “Your continued stay in the United Kingdom will be for others to determine, not for me.”

The case adds to wider scrutiny over criminal offences involving migrants entering Britain illegally by small boat and housed in taxpayer-funded accommodation. Recent reporting has highlighted numerous cases in which migrants living in hotels across the country have been charged with serious crimes, including rape and sexual assault.

Some other recent cases involving boat migrants that have drawn public attention include the conviction of an Afghan migrant who threatened to kill Reform Party leader Nigel Farage, and a migrant sex offender who was mistakenly released from prison after his offending had sparked riots.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

17 hours ago
Crime
Immigration

Suspected Tren de Aragua Gangster Charged With Ramming Feds.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Venezuelan illegal immigrant with alleged ties to the Tren de Aragua gang, Luis Nino Moncada, was charged with aggravated assault of a federal officer after allegedly ramming a U.S. Border Patrol vehicle in Portland, Oregon.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Luis Nino Moncada, Yorlenys Betzabeth Zambrano-Contreras, U.S. Border Patrol agents, and federal prosecutors.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The incident occurred on January 8 in Portland, Oregon, with charges filed on Monday.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Anyone who crosses the red line of assaulting law enforcement will be met with the full force of this Justice Department,” wrote Attorney General Pam Bondi on X (formerly Twitter).

🎯IMPACT: The charges highlight ongoing concerns about illegal immigration and gang activity, as well as the safety of federal law enforcement officers in light of increasingly violent attacks—especially with automobiles.

IN FULL

Luis Nino Moncada, a Venezuelan illegal immigrant suspected of being an associate of the Tren de Aragua gang, was charged by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on Monday with aggravated assault of a federal officer with a deadly weapon. According to an unsealed federal complaint, Moncada allegedly rammed a U.S. Border Patrol vehicle multiple times during a traffic stop in Portland, Oregon, on January 8, 2026.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi addressed the charges in a post on X (formerly Twitter), writing, “Anyone who crosses the red line of assaulting law enforcement will be met with the full force of this Justice Department.” Bondi added, “He should NEVER have been in our country to begin with, and we will ensure he NEVER walks free in America again.”

Federal prosecutors allege that Moncada and another suspected gang associate, Yorlenys Betzabeth Zambrano-Contreras, were in a vehicle when Border Patrol agents attempted to conduct a traffic stop targeting Zambrano-Contreras for arrest. Moncada, who entered the U.S. illegally in 2022 and has a criminal history, allegedly refused to comply and used the vehicle to ram a Border Patrol car repeatedly.

Moncada and Zambrano-Contreras were both struck by gunfire after an agent opened fire, fearing for the safety of the officers. Moncada later admitted to intentionally ramming the vehicle, according to authorities. The incident has drawn criticism from Oregon officials, including Governor Tina Kotek (D), who claimed the situation was “instigated by the reckless agenda of the Trump administration.”

The incident has—in part—contributed to anti-U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protests nationwide, with agitators condemning federal law enforcement actions in both Portland and Minneapolis, Minnesota, where an anti-ICE activist was fatally shot after attempting to ram an ICE agent with her SUV.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

18 hours ago
News

Biden Distributed $500k to Dead People in Walz’s Minnesota.

PULSE POINTS

❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the former Biden regime paid out more than $84 million in likely ineligible assistance to Minnesota, including payments to over 500 deceased tenants.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: HUD, led during this period by former Secretary Marcia Fudge, and the Biden regime.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Fiscal year 2024, with payments distributed across Minnesota and other states.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Biden’s HUD failed the people of Minnesota—paying dead people while vulnerable families were left behind,” said Secretary Scott Turner.

🎯IMPACT: Billions in taxpayer dollars flagged for potential fraud, with accusations of mismanagement under Democrat leadership.

IN FULL

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) improperly sent more than $84 million in rental assistance payments to Minnesota during former President Joe Biden’s final year in office, according to a recent audit. The findings raise new concerns about oversight failures as the state faces broader scrutiny over fraud in federally funded programs.

The audit revealed that $496,000 in HUD assistance was distributed to 509 tenants who had already passed away, while an additional $246,000 was paid to people whose Social Security numbers could not be verified, raising doubts about their eligibility. The payments were made through HUD’s Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) and Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) programs, which together distributed roughly $49 billion to more than four million households nationwide.

“Biden’s HUD failed the people of Minnesota—paying dead people while vulnerable families were left behind,” HUD Secretary Scott Turner said in response to the findings. Notably, Minnesota’s payments were part of a larger national problem. HUD is reviewing approximately $5.8 billion in rental assistance flagged as potentially improper across the country, including funds issued to about 30,000 deceased tenants and thousands of people whose citizenship status could not be confirmed.

Investigators found that 11 percent of the questionable funding went to more than 200,000 potentially ineligible recipients, with significant concentrations in New York, California, and Washington, D.C.

The audit comes as Minnesota, led by Democratic Governor Tim Walz, has faced mounting allegations of widespread fraud across multiple federal aid programs, often involving the Somali community. Federal prosecutors have brought numerous cases involving the misuse of pandemic-era relief and social services funds.

The Small Business Administration (SBA) recently halted loans to nearly 7,000 Minnesota borrowers after determining they were tied to suspected fraud involving Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loan funds. Federal investigators have estimated that Somali-linked fraud networks operating in Minnesota could ultimately account for losses exceeding $9 billion.

Walz recently announced he will not seek a third term as governor amid the ongoing controversy.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Pulse Ad
Pulse Ad