Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook has blocked The National Pulse from sharing a report on what even Joe Biden admits will be a “chaotic” influx of migrants this week in the United States, as Trump-era immigration controls expire.
While the border crisis may have seemed bad already, Title 42 expulsions authorized by then-President Donald Trump’s invocation of the Public Health Services Act in 2020 have seen off an astonishing three million migrants.
The Biden government, which has been trying to terminate the Title 42 regime since 2022, allowed them to naturally expire on Thursday, May 11th, with the President admitting this will result in a “chaotic” influx and border governors such as Greg Abbott warning a “catastrophic disaster” is looming.
The National Pulse covered the story, seeking to share it with our 425,000 followers on Facebook. But the social media platform blocked our reporting, alleging it violates “Community Standards on hate speech”:
The Facebook page for the Pulse was already being interfered with – much like the Facebook page for editor-in-chief Raheem Kassam. But this latest move could have further restricted its reach right as a new migrant crisis looks set to break on the southern border, when American citizens will be seeking news on its development.
Indeed, the site warned that further violations of its “Community Standards” could result in The National Pulse page being disabled altogether, severing a link between conservative journalists and hundreds of thousands of willing readers.
No explanation was provided as to why the likes of even CNN were permitted to speak of “about 155,000 migrants… waiting in shelters and on the streets of northern Mexican states bordering the U.S.” as they wait for Title 42 to expire, citing federal government sources, but the Pulse was not.
Mark Zuckerberg told Congress in 2018 that he could “understand” why people fear Facebook engages in “bias and political censorship” because “Facebook and the tech industry are located in Silicon Valley, which is an extremely left-leaning place.”
The National Pulse was also the first to report on Zuckerberg’s massive election interference in the 2020 presidential election: a critical node in the left’s election toolbox which some claim flipped the White House for Joe Biden.
show less
Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook has blocked The National Pulse from sharing a report on what even Joe Biden admits will be a "chaotic" influx of migrants this week in the United States, as Trump-era immigration controls expire. show more
Elon Musk has reportedly settled on Linda Yaccarino – an advertising executive who has peddled far-left, “woke” ideology, and appears to be entangled with the World Economic Forum – to replace him as CEO of Twitter, or ‘X Corp’ as the company is now known.
Who is Linda Yaccarino?
As Chairman of Comcast NBCUniversal, Yaccarino, 60, interviewed Musk in April about his vision for the social media platform.
Yaccarino’s biography states she is an executive chairman of Klaus Schwab’s notorious World Economic Forum (WEF), which brings together globalist political, corporate, and non-governmental organization elites every year at the Davos resort in Switzerland to push its Great Reset agenda.
She also lists herself as chairman of the WEF’s Taskforce on Future of Work, sits on its Media, Entertainment and Culture Industry Governors Steering Committee, and is “highly engaged with the Value in Media initiative,” which is aimed at reshaping online discourse.
“Common standards would be followed so certain types of content would not exist and would certainly not be monetized through advertising,” one Value in Media report states of the WEF’s agenda for digital speech.
In her role as a former chairman and current executive board member of the Ad Council, Yaccarino also partnered with the Biden government and its agencies “to create a COVID-19 vaccination campaign, featuring Pope Francis and reaching over 200 million Americans” from 2021 to 2022.
She served on President Trump’s Council on Sports Fitness and Nutrition from 2018 to 2021 as well.
The WEF-linked activist appears to be committed to the far-left’s vision of diversity, inclusion, and equality, praising initiatives to make news teams “50 per cent women and 50 per cent people of color.”
As a board member of another WEF-linked organization called The Female Quotient, Yaccarino has pushed initiatives to “foster gender and economic equality” and “racial justice” in partnership with the likes of Google, Instagram, and Twitter’s pre-Musk iteration. She is also a believer in the so-called “gender gap”.
All in all, Yaccarino’s resume is unlikely to inspire much confidence in conservative and right-leaning voices – a theme clearly identified by Musk and his allies just a few hours after he announced a new CEO and Yaccarino’s name was floated:
The commitment to open source transparency and accepting a wide range of viewpoints remains unchanged
At the time of publication, Musk had neither confirmed nor denied Yaccarino is replacing him, but he appears to be alive to people’s concerns that she would usher in a full-scale return to business as usual, claiming his “commitment to open source transparency and accepting a wide range of viewpoints remains unchanged”.
This is at odds with Yaccarino’s comments to Musk during their aforementioned interview, however, when she told him advertisers need to know they can “influence what you’re building” and urged him to stop tweeting after 3 a.m. because advertisers “would like to see that”.
She disagreed with the South African entrepreneur when he argued that advertiser influence of the sort she described would be “very wrong” and a “diminishment of free speech”.
“It’s more of an open feedback loop for [advertisers] to help develop Twitter into a place where they will be excited about investing more money. Product development, ad safety, content moderation — that’s what the influence is,” she suggested.
Musk’s awkward potential appointment revives the words of caution expressed by National Pulse editor Raheem Kassam in April 2022, when he warned: “There is no telling what Musk – a man who has attended a number of Chinese Communist-backed artificial intelligence conferences in recent years – will do next… We must remain on our guard, and we must not abandon the alternative platforms that have been built in recent years. We’re likely to regret it if we do.”
show less
Elon Musk has reportedly settled on Linda Yaccarino – an advertising executive who has peddled far-left, "woke" ideology, and appears to be entangled with the World Economic Forum – to replace him as CEO of Twitter, or 'X Corp' as the company is now known. show more
Illegal Chinese migrants are being guided through Latin America and into the United States by the Chinese Communist Party-linked app TikTok, reports suggest.
Douyin, the markedly less degenerate version of TikTok that parent firm ByteDance serves to mainland China, is awash with migrant influencers and hashtags offering detailed instructions on how to illegally enter the United States via a route known as the ‘Big Beautiful’, according to Reuters.
Reuters reports “hundreds of Chinese migrants crossing into the United States” via just one stretch of the Mexican frontier in south-east Texas, and “interviewed more than two dozen in Mandarin.”
They found that “all” of them were inspired to make the journey by social media, and drew on it heavily to facilitate their travels — but ByteDance ignored requests for comment on the issue.
No Mo
Many of those interviewed by Reuters claimed they had headed for the United States because COVID lockdowns had destroyed their businesses — although it is all but impossible to prove motivations of illegal border crossers, as Europe found out to its cost at the height of its own migrant crisis in 2015-16.
One illegal said they “initially thought about getting a U.S. tourist visa and overstaying” but plumped for an old-fashioned illegal border crossing because the pandemic resulted in an increase in visa refusals.
Both visa holders and border crossers are eligible to claim asylum once they reach American soil, and are more likely than not to be successful, with U.S. Justice Department data indicating that almost 60 per cent of Chinese asylum claims are accepted.
The actual security regime at the border also appears to have become laxer per the migrants themselves, with one social media user going by ‘Lee Gaga’ tracked down by Reuters saying they were at large in New York City after a very brief detention.
“I was released only after three days and three nights. I got lucky because the border policy has been good lately,” they boasted.
Whether said border policy is also “good” from the perspective of American citizens is another matter.
All in all, Chinese migrants account for a relatively small fraction of the enormous illegal immigration waves into the United States, accounting for some 6,500 entrants in the six months from October 2022.
Nevertheless, Chinese migration looks to be a major growth industry for traffickers, with that 6,500 figure being fifteen times the comparable figure for the same period in 2021.
show less
Illegal Chinese migrants are being guided through Latin America and into the United States by the Chinese Communist Party-linked app TikTok, reports suggest. show more
France’s President Emmanuel Macron has defended artwork which appears to depict a child being orally raped by an adult after protestors threw paint on it.
The graphic painting titled fuck abstraction! depicts an entirely nude, muscular adult forcing what appears to be a naked, slightly built male child kneeling with his hands bound behind his back to fellate him.
Someone who objected to its pedophilic content splashed it with purple paint at the Palais de Tokyo modern art museum in Paris, prompting France’s increasingly unpopular globalist president to leap to its defense.
“Targeting a work of art is an attack on our values,” Macron complained.
“In France, art is always free and respect for artistic creation is guaranteed,” he added.
Hypocrisy.
Miriam Cahn, a Swiss artist in her seventies, has claimed that the work, supposedly a tribute of sorts to victims of alleged war crimes in Bucha, Ukraine, does not depict a man and a child. She claims the victim’s childlike size and physique is intended to represent “the corporeal power of the oppressor, and the fragility of the oppressed” — but many are unconvinced.
Indeed, the Association Juristes Pour l’Enfance (Lawyers for Childhood) appealed to the courts and the State Council to have the painting removed under child protections laws, but were unsuccessful.
Lawyers for the Palais de Tokyo hailed judges’ refusal to intervene, like Macron, as victory over “attempts at circumventing the right to freedom of expression by way of so-called child protection”.
Such references to “freedom of expression” will be risible to observers familiar with just how weak free speech protections are in France, with a woman in her fifties who referred to Macron as “filth” currently due to appear in court for the crime of “insulting the President of the Republic” in June.
Neither the United Kingdom nor the European Union have anything resembling America’s First Amendment to protect free speech.
Unlike the First Amendment, which tells the state what it cannot do with respect to abridging people’s civil liberties, Europe’s so-called freedom of speech protections derive from the European Convention on Human Rights, which tells citizens what they can do.
The British, infamously, can be charged for making “grossly offensive” remarks or jokes on Facebook, Twitter, or even in private WhatsApp groups, while laws like the one being used to prosecute a woman for insulting President Macron are fairly common across Continental Europe.
In Germany it can be a crime to insult any public official, with a lockdown and vaccine sceptic being fined €16,500 (~$18,175) for calling two politicians “mendacious, corrupt, power-hungry, characterless and dishonorable creatures” in an email.
These German speech restrictions even extend to foreign officials, with the authorities controversially pursuing a case against a man who wrote a rude poem about the Turkish president quite far, until public backlash forced a climbdown.
More recently, people have found themselves being arrested for having the “wrong” opinions on the war in Ukraine, with a German recently fined €4,000 (~$4,400) for having a Russian ‘Z’ symbol on his car and a Polish woman being put on trial for accusing the Ukrainian government of a “lack of integrity” and saying she “believe[d] in Russia’s victory and help for us Slavs” in a social media post.
show less
France's President Emmanuel Macron has defended artwork which appears to depict a child being orally raped by an adult after protestors threw paint on it. show more
The end of Title 42 migration controls on Thursday, the 11th of May will unleash the ‘Merkel Madness’ of the 2015-16 migrant crisis on the United States. Despite this self-evident disaster at the U.S. border, President Joe Biden appears unwilling to do anything that would curtail what many are openly describing as an “invasion” with drastic consequences.
Invoked by then-President Donald Trump under public health legislation dating back to the 1940s at the onset of the Chinese coronavirus pandemic, Title 42 expulsions have been the primary means by which asylum seekers – an astonishing three million of them – have been kept out of the U.S. while any genuine claims were assessed.
Biden, despite running on a platform of engineering a “surge” of asylum seekers at the border while seeking the Democratic nomination for 2020, initially maintained and even expanded the Title 42 regime. Yet, he moved to dismantle America’s border protections in 2022.
Republican-led states have fought successful rearguard legal actions against this effort to open the floodgates ever since, but now they are out of time, with the controls due to naturally expire on May 11th, and a proverbial dam poised to burst and completely overwhelm the southern border.
Officials in Arizona claim to have seen Border Patrol intelligence indicating that that there “are approximately 700,000 [migrants] in the shelters in Mexico waiting to come into the United States” once Title 42 is allowed to expire. El Paso alone faces some 12,000 to 35,000 migrants waiting across the Rio Grande to descend on the city, with Mayor Oscar Leeser lamenting: “There is no light at the end of the tunnel.”
Even the likes of CNN say federal government sources are telling them of “more than 150,000 migrants… waiting in shelters and streets in northern Mexican states”.
Some of these migrants are not waiting for the starting to gun to fire, with up to 150 being found crammed onto just one train that had crossed the border into Texas on May 5th.
The speed and scale of the impending influx is such that it will likely come to define the Biden administration and redefine the 2024 presidential race – in much the same way as the 2015-16 migrant crisis came to define the Angela Merkel administration in Germany, and transformed the political landscape of the European Union at large.
Joe Biden stood on a debate stage and said he would encourage a MASSIVE border surge. And here we are. pic.twitter.com/NXaPbn8dYh
Just as Biden pledged to “immediately surge to the border all those people who are seeking asylum” as he sought the 2020 nomination, Merkel, who won admirers on the right by declaring that multiculturalism had “utterly failed” in 2010, pledged “no limits” on the number of asylum seekers Germany would attempt to absorb in 2015.
With her country lying at the heart of the European Union, the result was that migrants from Syria but also the wider Middle East, Africa, and Asia stormed into the bloc by the hundreds of thousands, chiefly via small boats launched from Turkey for the islands of Greece, an EU border state.
From there, they crossed to the Greek mainland marched north in massed, military-style columns – providing fodder for a poster campaign that would help to secure the Brexit vote in the United Kingdom – with some of the radical Islamic terrorists who would go on to murder dozens in Paris, France hiding among them.
Not all of them reached Germany or other northerly welfare states, however, for as leftist politicians in American states far from the southern border, such as New York, often sour on open borders once the incomers begin arriving on their doorsteps, so did the Germans attempt to turn off the spigot after being overwhelmed by around a million “New Europeans”.
This left many EU member-states stuck with huge numbers of migrants they never asked for who had been en route to Germany when its policy changed, radically transforming demographics and destroying the tourism industry on many Greek islands and creating huge, ongoing tensions between Germany and its allies and conservative-led states like Poland and Hungary.
Both countries, along with near-neighbors such as Czechia and Slovakia, openly defied efforts by the European Union to clean up the mess Merkel created by enforcing the compulsory redistribution of migrants across the bloc, opening still-festering wounds in its body politic.
Even with Title 42 still in force, America’s simmering border crisis is already opening similar fissures between the Republic’s states, with conservative-led border states facilitating the transportation of large numbers of migrants to left-led states – and those left-led states are proving less enthusiastic than might be expected about these movements, given their pro-migration rhetoric.
Whether these fissures will widen into chasms once the “Bidenvasion” begins in earnest from May 11th remains to be seen.
show less
The end of Title 42 migration controls on Thursday, the 11th of May will unleash the 'Merkel Madness' of the 2015-16 migrant crisis on the United States. Despite this self-evident disaster at the U.S. border, President Joe Biden appears unwilling to do anything that would curtail what many are openly describing as an "invasion" with drastic consequences.
show more
More than two-thirds of Americans – 69 percent – believe that the evidence of foreign influence peddling by the Biden family is a serious scandal, according to a recent survey conducted by Rasmussen Reports.
The vast majority of Republicans and almost half of Democrats answered either “very serious” or “somewhat serious” to the question: “How serious of a scandal are the accusations of foreign influence peddling by Joe Biden and his family?”
Nearly three-quarters of Republicans – 73 percent – said it was a “very serious” scandal, with another 15 percent stating it was “somewhat serious.” A notable 49 percent of Democrats thought the accusations concurred. Some 26 percent believing it was “very serious” and 23 percent “somewhat serious.”
In fact, there were more Democrats who thought the accusations to be “serious” than those who answered either “not very serious” – 28 percent – or “not at all serious” – 18 percent.
Joe Biden’s Profiteering.
Furthermore, Rasmussen Reports told those surveyed that “[c]ongressional investigators say they have obtained documents ‘that would implicate Joe Biden in a pray-for-play scheme, in trying to set up a deal to receive funds to he and his family, in exchange for foreign policy decisions’ when Biden was vice president,” then asked: “How likely is it that Joe Biden personally profited from such a deal?”
Republican voters seem convinced that Joe Biden personally profited, with 65 percent answering “very likely” and another 20 percent answering “somewhat likely.”
Just under half of Democrats – 44 percent – believed that Joe Biden personally profited from such deals, with 20 percent answering “very likely” and 22 percent “somewhat likely.”
A combined total of 50 percent of Democrats disagreed with the question, only six percent more than those who thought it likely.
More Than Just Hunter.
Lastly, Rasmussen asked: “Do you agree with this statement: The Hunter Biden scandal “is not just about the president’s son. This is about the entire Biden family, including the President of the United States.”
Sixty-five percent of voters agreed with the statement. An overwhelming 75 percent of Republicans answered, “strongly agree” and another 12 percent “somewhat agree[ing].”
Democrats were again strongly divided over the scandal, as only five percent more disagreed with the statement, with a total of 44 percent answering either “strongly agree” or “somewhat agree.” A majority of democrats disagreed with the statement, however. Nearly one-third – 32 percent – answered “strongly disagree” and 17 percent “somewhat disagree.”
More than two-thirds of Americans – 69 percent – believe that the evidence of foreign influence peddling by the Biden family is a serious scandal, according to a recent survey conducted by Rasmussen Reports. show more
The O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) has released footage from a citizen journalist showing the Housing Director at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota promising “top of the list” treatment for a fake transgender student invented for the purposes of the media sting.
In footage release Wednesday evening, director Zoe Chang can be seen pledging multiple preferential accomodations for a transgender student, including but not limited to:
Sharing a room or floor with biologically female students;
Obtaining first place on a list for their own room, due to their supposed gender dysphoria, and;
Refusing to tell other students about the transgendered student in their midst.
The full clip can be viewed below, and contains details of Chang’s absurd promises at the Catholic university, as well as her explanation that the university is attempting to be quietly more deviant, without being “too public.”
WATCH:
1st OMG Citizen Journalist-Led Story:
A Citizen Journalist was rewarded $1000 for this recording obtained about a Catholic University allowing "trans girl" to room in the girl’s dorm without their knowledge. pic.twitter.com/eFmsTZnm1W
The news follows an incident in Wisconsin, where high school girls were allegedly exposed to the male genitalia of an 18-year-old student who identifies as “trans” as they showered at their school. Parents were not informed at the time of the incident.
show less
The O'Keefe Media Group (OMG) has released footage from a citizen journalist showing the Housing Director at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota promising "top of the list" treatment for a fake transgender student invented for the purposes of the media sting. show more
U.S. taxpayers will once again fund EcoHealth Alliance, a company that has collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for over a decade, for a project that began on April 26 called: ‘Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.’
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-collaborating nonprofit, EcoHealth, has been granted an annual $576,290 for the next four years by the taxpayer-funded and formerly Fauci-led National Institutes of Health (NIH).
The Wuhan lab itself will contribute to the new project with more than 300 whole and partial genome sequences of SARS-related bat coronaviruses from its collection. EcoHealth staff will analyze various genomes and enzyme receptors to determine how SARS-CoV-2 enters human cells. Yet, the former recombinant virus research that occurred before the pandemic will not be resumed, nor will the project continue to work with live viruses, they claim.
The news will be of little comfort to those who have questions over Fauci, EcoHealth, and Wuhan lab links, with The National Pulse exposing many of these details over the course of 2020/21.
The resumption of the grant comes after former-President Donald Trump halted Fauci’s NIH-backed research into bat coronaviruses in Wuhan in April 2020.
Before the suspension, the 2014 grant to EcoHealth funded “controversial experiments” that mixed different bat viruses related to “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” (SARS). NIH grant number R01AI110964 provided the Wuhan lab with roughly $600,000 over eight years, extracting viruses from animals and “manipulating” them to make them more transmissible to humans.
Rutgers University Microbiologist Dr. Richard Ebright, however, said “[i]t is an outrage that EcoHealth Alliance – an organization that potentially shares culpability for the origin of the Covid-19 Pandemic…continues to receive US-government grants and contracts.”
“Back to Work.”
The controversial and compromised director of EcoHealth Alliance, Peter Daszak – who openly admitted to “faking” figures for a $7 billion pandemic grant during a meeting with the Obama administration – announced that he and his colleagues are happy that they “have the ability to finally get back to work.”
“What we want to know is could [one of these viruses] actually infect a human and they have a way to do this just using computers, or just using simple lab work,” Daszak added.
Peter Daszak participated in a “longtime” and Fauci-funded research effort alongside the Wuhan lab into coronaviruses before the pandemic began. He has since insisted upon the “natural origin” theory rather than the “lab leak theory,” as well as U.S. federal investments of up to $1 trillion into “pandemic prevention.”
The recent funding comes despite Daszak’s EcoHealth receiving a $4.7 million grant from the Biden government in 2021. The grant was the largest that EcoHealth had ever received from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the third highest grant the group ever received.
Republican Deputy Whip Rep. Reschenthaler introduced legislation to ban all federal funding to EcoHealth by way of the “Defund EcoHealth Alliance Act” in January this year.
In a statement Reschenthaler explained: “It is unconscionable that EcoHealth Alliance repeatedly funneled American taxpayer dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab controlled by the Chinese Communist Party that conducts dangerous and potentially deadly research.”
show less
U.S. taxpayers will once again fund EcoHealth Alliance, a company that has collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for over a decade, for a project that began on April 26 called: 'Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.'show more
The U.S. Congress’s Oversight and Weaponization committees have respectively confirmed swathes of 2020 National Pulse reporting into family business practices of President Joe Biden, revealing what appears to be an influence peddling grift involving his son Hunter as well as eight other family members.
The reports also confirm that the U.S. national intelligence apparatus aided and abetted the Bidens in covering up their links to Chinese Communist-linked entities that were paying massive amounts in exchange for political favors, as well as attempting to delegitimize the release of Hunter Biden’s laptop and its contents.
Both reports can be read in full at the bottom of this page.
The Biden Family Grift.
The first memo, from Rep. James Comer, concludes:
Biden family members and business associates created a web of over 20 companies—most were limited liability companies formed during Joe Biden’s vice presidency;
Bank records show the Biden family, their business associates, and their companies received over $10 million from foreign nationals’ companies. The Committee has identified payments to Biden family members from foreign companies while Joe Biden served as Vice President and after he left public office.
the Biden family used business associates’ companies to receive millions of dollars from foreign companies.
complicated financial transactions appear to conceal the source of the funds and reduce the conspicuousness of the total amounts made into the Biden bank accounts.
Chinese nationals and companies with significant ties to Chinese intelligence and the Chinese Communist Party hid the source of the funds by layering domestic limited liability companies.
The memo also confirms that after he assumed the vice presidency in 2009, Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and his business associates formed at least 15 companies, which processed transfers ranging from approximately $5,000 to at least $3 million. It also confirms the $80,000 diamond gift to Hunter Biden from Chinese Communist Ye Jianming in 2017, as well as providing examples of how the Biden foreign money was moved around:
Weaponization.
A second report out from Congress’s Weaponization committee examines how a letter signed by 51 intelligences operatives aided the Biden campaign in its cover-up of the Hunter Biden laptop that led to the revelations above, and more.
The report confirms a number of bombshell revelations including a major admission from former acting CIA director Michael Morell, who admitted in testimony to drafting the statement from 51 former intelligence officials with a view to “help[ing] Vice President Biden in the debate.”
Morell and his colleague Marc Polymeropoulos even went so far as to exchange text messages boasting about their efforts duping the American public into believe the hard drive was “Russian disinformation” and suggested there may be jobs, or money involved as a reward.
That admission came against the backdrop of America’s Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) itself “fast tracking” the letter, and even reportedly approaching former intelligence officials with a view to having them sign onto the letter too, which they did. In effect, the CIA aided a foreign-linked presidential campaign (that of the Bidens) against the sitting Commander-in-Chief, President Trump.
The CIA fast tracked the letter, and approved it, despite its overt political nature and falsehoods. They boasted about how it might land them jobs or money. pic.twitter.com/NAR1g0WBZs
Asked about his role in the letter, Morell confirmed to Congress: “[T]here were two intentions here, right? One was to make clear to the American people that the Russians were interfering in the election, and the other was to help Vice President Biden in the debate.”
Asked why he and his fellow signatories to the now-infamous letter wanted to help Joe Biden, Morrel responded: “Because I wanted him to win the election.”
The outright admission over the politicization of the U.S. national security apparatus is certain to rankle its chief figures in Washington, D.C., causing further concern over the legitimacy of the 2020 election itself, and questions over 2024.
Colluding Against the Commander-in-Chief.
Close examination of the report reveals that the committees also believe that “the CIA may have have promoted the statement”, with an employee alleged to have solicited signatures for it, representing one of the most heinous acts of political interference by the government in any election, ever.
🚨🚨🚨 The United States Central Intelligence Agency colluded behind the back of its own Commander in Chief to aid an opposing (and China-backed) candidate, using lies, and officialdom.
The report reveals there was an earlier, even more partisan version of the letter that some signatories were uncomfortable with, denying Biden was involved in corruption in Ukraine and claiming that his suspect actions there were, if anything, in aid of fighting corruption.
The CIA fast tracked the letter, and approved it, despite its overt political nature and falsehoods. They boasted about how it might land them jobs or money. pic.twitter.com/NAR1g0WBZs
Like the Bidens, the CIA is failing to fully cooperate with the investigation, with the report noting that requests for documentation that were expected to be met by April 4th having gone unanswered.
The CIA refuses to comply with the congressional investigation into this. Seems legit 🤨 pic.twitter.com/HKOVz7O6JO
The U.S. Congress's Oversight and Weaponization committees have respectively confirmed swathes of 2020 National Pulse reporting into family business practices of President Joe Biden, revealing what appears to be an influence peddling grift involving his son Hunter as well as eight other family members. show more
The United States faces an influx of at least 150,000 immigrants when Trump-era Title 42 border controls expire on May 11th, with Joe Biden openly admitting that it’s “going to be chaotic”.
As bad as the situation on America’s southern border already is under the Biden-Harris administration, Title 42 expulsions authorized by Trump under the Public Health Services Act in 2020 have seen off some three million would-be border violators.
Law enforcement will be stripped of this valuable tool from Thursday, with President Biden – who would have taken away them away even faster if Republican-led states had not thwarted him in the courts – refusing to renew them.
Even he seems to admit the enormity of the crisis his actions are poised to unleash, telling the press: “It’s going to be chaotic for a while.”
Indeed, Axios reports “scene[s] of chaos and desperation” on both sides of the border already, with hundreds-strong migrant encampments strewn about the frontier and an estimated 150,000 people in Mexico ready to try and breach it.
Some officials have put the number of migrants waiting in Mexico’s streets and shelters for a chance to cross even higher, at around 700,000.
Further south, the President of Guatemala, Alejandro Giammattei, has said another 80,000 mostly Venezuelan migrants are trekking through his country, according to Texas Rep. Tony Gonzales, who also claims the White House has not been taking the Guatemalan leader’s calls on the crisis.
“It’s going to be chaotic for a while.”
—Biden says even more chaos is coming to the southern border once Title 42 ends this week pic.twitter.com/POFMNzmIkn
Greg Abbott, the Governor of Texas, accused President Biden of having effectively rolled out the red carpet for illegal immigrants, predicting a “catastrophic disaster”.
“I think that there is no question that this is going to be extremely challenging,” Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas confessed while observing the situation at the Rio Grande last Friday, warning that he could not “understate the severity of the challenge that we expect to encounter.”
Kyrsten Sinema, a Senator for Arizona who walked away from the Democrats to sit as in independent at the end of 2022, has complained that the Biden administration “had two years to prepare for this” and failed to do so, meaning “migrants will be in crisis as soon as next week.”
“It will be a humanitarian crisis because we are not prepared,” she added.
Per NBC, “the number of undocumented immigrant crossings at the southwest border for fiscal year 2022 topped 2.76 million, breaking the previous annual record by more than 1 million, according to Customs and Border Protection data.”
show less
The United States faces an influx of at least 150,000 immigrants when Trump-era Title 42 border controls expire on May 11th, with Joe Biden openly admitting that it's "going to be chaotic". show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
